1. Understanding motivational aspects of
collaboration between scientists and
citizen scientists – Biotrackers.net
Citizen Science & Biodiversity:
Meeting at the crossroads
October 21, 2011
2. Scientists and enthusiasts
"Scientists often have an aversion to what nonscientists
say about science” (Salk, 1986)
Collaboration is based on several factors:
• Shared vocabulary, practices, and meanings
• Mutual recognition of knowledge, competency, and
prestige
• Motivation to collaborate
3. Research questions
• What are the major motivational factors affecting
volunteers and scientists engagement in citizen
science projects?
• What are the major motivational barriers to such
collaboration?
7. The motivational cycle
No continued
recognition = Personal interest Scientists –
decline in need for data
Initial/ongoing
motivation egoism
Continued involvement
Ongoing
attribution, inclusion in
scientific Initial involvement
work/products, communit Interest, thirst for
y involvement, advocacy knowledge
Egoism, coll
ectivism, alt Active collaboration
ruism egoism Without
Training, attribution, scientists
recognition =
Scientists –
altruistic support
recognition loss of
for public motivation
education
8. Obstacles to collaboration
• Mutual apprehension
• Lack of trust (“quality control”)
• Not acknowledging motivational factors
9. What next?
• Interventions through design changes:
– Variations on feedback
– Designing for locality
– Matching people and tasks
– Breaking down projects to smaller “building blocks”
– Synergy of small scale projects
Mixed method study, survey of 142 people, who we reached through the EOL mailing list, personal invitations, social media – twitter, facebook18 interviews with people who completed the survey, but also personal contacts, some here at the open u.
Participation in social activities stems from personal and collective reasons
Self identified as scientists and volunteers. At the outset we saw no significant difference between scientists and citizen scientists as far as altruism, principlaism and egoism go, and a very significant difference as far as collectivism goes, meaning that citizen scientists actually saw a lot more benefit in their work to their communities, than scientists saw collaboration with CS as less benefitting their community. Egoism was also somewhat differnet between the two population. We explored these differences in qualitative interviews.
Here are some of the things that came up under the cycle, and Illl talk about them it detail.