SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 18
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Policy making for swarms
Alberto Cottica, Edgeryders – Big Picture Days, June 1st 2013
Hello, thank you all for showing up. I do research for a newly minted company called Edgeryders. The reason why the
company even exists and why its business model looks the way it does itself has a lot to do with what we are going to be
talking about today. But more on that later.
We are here to talk about swarm coops, or whatever you want to call these unorthodox constellations of people in action. At
the heart of this concept there is a fundamental paradox. Swarm coops derive their uncanny efficiency from radical
decentralization of decision making and action; yet, decentralization might and does cause such action to develop in directions
so different from what it had been intended to be as to be unrecognizable. I guess most of us will be turning around this
paradox in their head. The main tool I am using to debunk this paradox is network theory: I conceptualize swarms as people in
networks. In networks, nodes might be equal in the amount of top-down power over others, but they will typically be very
unequal in terms of connectivity, hence the ability to spread information (including narratives and calls to action) across the
network. Uneven connectivity adds some directionality to the swarm, in the sense that the most connected people get it to go
their way most of the times.
I am going to try and give you a perhaps slightly unusual perspective on swarm coops. I am a policy guy – public policy design
(and some deployment) is what paid my bills for the last ten years. Public policy is generally understood as a top-down
process: some leader somewhere makes a decision and that decision is enacted. Since the accepted modi operandi of public
policy are encoded into law, such top-down thinking is hardwired into organizational charts, remits and procedures. A decision
maker wanting to do things differently will not in generally be enough for things to happen differently. Think of this as an
especially hard area to do swarms in. That’s not a bad thing for today’s purposes, because it provides us with a clean
benchmark. If you can do it in the government, you can probably do it in most places.
All this is very tentative. I can’t claim I know how to do this stuff. I mean, I do it, and it kind of works, but I am not sure exactly
why, so I would be the first not to want to turn the revenue agency into a swarm just yet. In fact, the reason why I am here is
that I hope you guys can help me make some progress. I am also going to assume you guys have been thinking into it as hard
as I have, so I am giving you the full complexity of the argument. Stop me if I touch on something that does not make sense to
you, or that you don’t know about.
Iatrogenics: harm done by the healer
Just a word on why public sector agencies might want to think in swarms. As our societies get ever more complex,
they get ever more difficult to second guess. There is a real risk of what Nassim Taleb calls iatrogenics, harm done
by the healer.
0
50
100
150
200
2007-2013 – Billion €
102
196
World Bank lending commitments
Italy, strategic national framework pipeline
The world
4 regions
in Italy
One of my favorite examples of that is with public spending. In my country, Italy, we have a situation. The north of
the country is well-developed, with quite a strong manufacturing economy, whereas its south is lagging behind.
This is a high political priority, and for at least fifty years we have thrown money and brains at it.
0
1750
3500
5250
7000
2007-2013 – per capita €
6057
32.7
The world
4 regions
in Italy
World Bank lending commitments
Italy, strategic national framework pipeline
The world
The result is a huge pipeline concentrated on just four regions (the region is the most important spending
authority in Italy). They have a very hard time even just making it happen – let alone ensuring proper monitoring.
“Everyone was talking about
public sector tenders.”
– Tiago Dias Miranda in southern Italy, 2013
The result of this situation: smart, entrepreneurial young people in Italy’s Mezzogiorno are talking about public
sector tenders. They know all the acronyms of European programs. And why not? Though most of the money ends
up with networks of incumbents, even the crumbs can be quite a big payoff. But of course, in development terms,
this is just a distraction: as they write funding applications, they are not starting companies, or leaving the
country, or squatting buildings; they are not engaging in collective, trial-and-error discovery of the paths that
lead to the healing of the economy. And in fact, the economy does not heal. The government means mostly well,
but the amount of damage inflicted is terrifying. This is why I and others are exploring other ways. I am exploring
the way of smart crowds, or swarms. It is not a bad thing to explore: if you are low on the public policy food chain,
swarms give you an alternative power base.
Public policies as a buyer’s market
Photo: marsmet481
But doing policy in swarms has an immediate consequence: you need to recruit people, and those people do not
work for you, do not take (much) money from you and need to be convinced.
Photo: marsmet481
... and that’s a big reality check right there. I believe this has given some competitive edge to my own projects. I
just had to work harder to get ANYTHING off the ground.
Photo: marsmet481
Falkvinge’s Law: lead by getting skin in the game
So how to do it? Let’s start by what I am going to call Rick Falkvinge’s Law (in honor of the founder of the Swedish
Pirate Party): leadership in a network is exerted from the front. You start by saying: “I am doing X. Who’s in?” This
is more radical than it seems. Nassim Taleb has pointed out that modern society rewards non-risk takers
(corporates, politicians, bureaucrats), and that this is new (Alexander the Great led his own charges etc.).
Falkvinge’s Law restores the idea that risk-takers should be honored and rewarded.
Interface: the fishing rod model
Photo: Joel Obrecht
You are going to need an interface – in fact, probably several layers. Governments are Weberian bureaucracies for
very good accountability reasons. Swarms are very clearly not. So you need some smart relaying between the
inside of the government agency and the outside, with the swarm having some kind of legitimacy without being
subject to the hard constraints of public servants. It’s like a fishing rod, thick and rigid atthe handle, but thin and
flexible towards the end.
Timing: get friends to start the bandwagon
Photo: flod
Scholars of swarms, social networks etc. focus typically on the behavior of the formed swarm. But if you’ve ever
tried it, you know that the hardest part is to kickstart one. We need a much better developed embryology of
swarms. Me, the better method I know is still to leverage trust network of friends. This is how Vinay jumpstarted
Big Picture Days: he wrote an email to twenty people trying to get the first, say, six to commit. Then, he could tell
everyone “You don’t want to miss this cool event. Why, Alberto Cottica is coming!”. Even if you don’t know who
the hell Alberto Cottica is, such a call works with the deep wiring of human psychology. We have plenty of
experimental psychology results around that by now.
Randomness: shake things up (hence parties)
Photo: Medhin Paolos
You are making policy because someone perceives a situation that is not fixing itself. Rather than going in with a
heavy intervention (traditional economists will “maximize the welfare function” and push the economy towards the
maximum), which is iatrogenetic, you can simply shake things up a little bit to see if the system gets unstuck from
its present undesirable attractor and starts moving towards a better one. Complexity thinking has given us,
among other things, an attractive theory of innovation based on generative relationships: innovation stems from
people being similar enough that they can communicate well, but different enough to give each other mild
cognitive shocks, inducing new ways to look upon things. It is not hard to assess the generative potential of a
relationship, but it impossible to predict in advance which potentially generative relationships will actually lead to
breakthroughs.
So, I just like to throw parties. Curated parties increase the number of new connections in your network and
therefore, in probability, the number of new things being tried. This, in turn, increases the probability of your
situation unmooring from where it had been stuck. And no iatrogenics. Win!
Transparency: requests for comments
Photo: Elena Trombetta
I find a radically transparent behavior to be advantageous when running a swarm: it’s a buyers market, and you
need to win trust. Transparency also doubles up as a management tool: most people will just appreciate that you
are being honest about, for example, how much money you spend and on what, but occasionally somebody pays
close attention and ends up making useful suggestions. If you have to fight a narrative of public policy as corrupt
and self-referential (I do) transparency is an amazingly effective tool in reducing conflict and suspicion.
TIme bombs: zero entrenchment
Many swarms tend to lose their magic after a while – the mavericks of the early days get suitified, their project
becomes a job or what have you. I like to build time bombs in my projects: if a swarm is active enough, it will find
a way to survive it. In fact my company, Edgeryders, formed with the intention of providing a new core to a
community that assembled around a public sector project I used to direct. The project ended, but some of us felt
the community was too good to pass on, so we decided to build a small organization to provide it with the
scaffolding initially provided by the public sector project.
Efficiency: don’t touch the wicked problem
Photo: Alberto Cottica
When you are doing stuff with a swarm and it appears to be working, outside people will try to get it onto
problems they care about. I try to resist this. It implies a revision of the social contract, which tends to be
conflictual: also, it might destroy that feeling of effortless impact that core community members find intoxicating.
Generally, bad idea.
Trust: no strings attached (even give people cash)
Photo: Maxymedia
Control is costly and boring. Relinquishing it, and rather focusing on enabling people to take initiative makes you
save a lot of time and money, and is a huge motivator, as people feel empowered and trusted. If you can, you
should give people a little cash with no strings attached. There is a recent Ugandan study that provides evidence
that, even without swarms, even giving money to young rural poor results in increased hours worked and
increased income for the people in question.
Measure: do you have enough complexity?
Photo: Maxymedia
To do this stuff, you need a minimum of complexity. A nail does not evolve; you can’t jumpstart a swarm in your
family, and you probably can’t in a village either. In the natural world, complexity has mathematical signatures
that scientists can look for. Swarms that do most of the heavy lifting online leave behind them a trail of data that
you can search for self-organizing behavior. I am personally involved in an effort to find cheap, quick methods to
investigate the matter. If you care about this, we should definitely speak, there’s not many of us out there.
Dogfood: eat your own (and we do)
Photo: NikonColucci
Edgeryders eats its own dogfood. It is a pretty unique case of a company that grew out of a community that grew
out of a public sector project. The company exists to provide the scaffolding for the community to stay connected;
and to empower community members to jumpstart cool projects that benefit everyone, like the unMonastery.
So,what do you think?

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Systems Thinking workshop @ Lean UX NYC 2014
Systems Thinking workshop @ Lean UX NYC 2014Systems Thinking workshop @ Lean UX NYC 2014
Systems Thinking workshop @ Lean UX NYC 2014johanna kollmann
 
Making sense of messy problems - Systems thinking for interaction designers
Making sense of messy problems - Systems thinking for interaction designersMaking sense of messy problems - Systems thinking for interaction designers
Making sense of messy problems - Systems thinking for interaction designersjohanna kollmann
 
Tom Loosemore - Camp Digital 2016
Tom Loosemore - Camp Digital 2016Tom Loosemore - Camp Digital 2016
Tom Loosemore - Camp Digital 2016Nexer Digital
 
LinkedInVersionOfBernieBarackLetter
LinkedInVersionOfBernieBarackLetterLinkedInVersionOfBernieBarackLetter
LinkedInVersionOfBernieBarackLetterWilliam Reichertz
 
What's Next: Insights to shape future practices
What's Next: Insights to shape future practicesWhat's Next: Insights to shape future practices
What's Next: Insights to shape future practicesmonitorinstitute
 
Collaboration hacks - let's do great together
Collaboration hacks - let's do great togetherCollaboration hacks - let's do great together
Collaboration hacks - let's do great togetherjohanna kollmann
 
How and Why Clusters are Made
How and Why Clusters are MadeHow and Why Clusters are Made
How and Why Clusters are MadeEd Morrison
 
Rettig+du plessis ixda_pgh_participation+design_apr2017
Rettig+du plessis ixda_pgh_participation+design_apr2017Rettig+du plessis ixda_pgh_participation+design_apr2017
Rettig+du plessis ixda_pgh_participation+design_apr2017Marc Rettig
 

Was ist angesagt? (9)

Systems Thinking workshop @ Lean UX NYC 2014
Systems Thinking workshop @ Lean UX NYC 2014Systems Thinking workshop @ Lean UX NYC 2014
Systems Thinking workshop @ Lean UX NYC 2014
 
Making sense of messy problems - Systems thinking for interaction designers
Making sense of messy problems - Systems thinking for interaction designersMaking sense of messy problems - Systems thinking for interaction designers
Making sense of messy problems - Systems thinking for interaction designers
 
Tom Loosemore - Camp Digital 2016
Tom Loosemore - Camp Digital 2016Tom Loosemore - Camp Digital 2016
Tom Loosemore - Camp Digital 2016
 
Understanding systems
Understanding systemsUnderstanding systems
Understanding systems
 
LinkedInVersionOfBernieBarackLetter
LinkedInVersionOfBernieBarackLetterLinkedInVersionOfBernieBarackLetter
LinkedInVersionOfBernieBarackLetter
 
What's Next: Insights to shape future practices
What's Next: Insights to shape future practicesWhat's Next: Insights to shape future practices
What's Next: Insights to shape future practices
 
Collaboration hacks - let's do great together
Collaboration hacks - let's do great togetherCollaboration hacks - let's do great together
Collaboration hacks - let's do great together
 
How and Why Clusters are Made
How and Why Clusters are MadeHow and Why Clusters are Made
How and Why Clusters are Made
 
Rettig+du plessis ixda_pgh_participation+design_apr2017
Rettig+du plessis ixda_pgh_participation+design_apr2017Rettig+du plessis ixda_pgh_participation+design_apr2017
Rettig+du plessis ixda_pgh_participation+design_apr2017
 

Andere mochten auch

Qué paso el día que nací
Qué paso el día que nacíQué paso el día que nací
Qué paso el día que nacíAdriel Leandroo
 
Service design breakfast - Customer experience management on Demand, BIG Desi...
Service design breakfast - Customer experience management on Demand, BIG Desi...Service design breakfast - Customer experience management on Demand, BIG Desi...
Service design breakfast - Customer experience management on Demand, BIG Desi...Service Design Breakfast
 
Presentación "Herramientas para vender más y mejora" Alejandro Castillo
Presentación "Herramientas para vender más y mejora" Alejandro CastilloPresentación "Herramientas para vender más y mejora" Alejandro Castillo
Presentación "Herramientas para vender más y mejora" Alejandro CastilloEOI Escuela de Organización Industrial
 
Como inserir minha prescrição de medicamentos
Como inserir minha prescrição de medicamentosComo inserir minha prescrição de medicamentos
Como inserir minha prescrição de medicamentosGlicOnline
 
Amputats
AmputatsAmputats
Amputatsmcaso
 
How to land a graduate position in Novo Nordisk?
How to land a graduate position in Novo Nordisk?How to land a graduate position in Novo Nordisk?
How to land a graduate position in Novo Nordisk?Mediehuset Ingeniøren Live
 
Microservices Architecture: Labs
Microservices Architecture: LabsMicroservices Architecture: Labs
Microservices Architecture: Labsgjuljo
 
Map hike preview
Map hike previewMap hike preview
Map hike previewGord Hunter
 
одинцово
одинцовоодинцово
одинцовоaderwer
 
Prezi Target Audience
Prezi Target AudiencePrezi Target Audience
Prezi Target Audiencebenlomax1
 
M.fitrah hi hukum(128)
M.fitrah hi hukum(128)M.fitrah hi hukum(128)
M.fitrah hi hukum(128)Fitrahdede
 

Andere mochten auch (16)

Qué paso el día que nací
Qué paso el día que nacíQué paso el día que nací
Qué paso el día que nací
 
Service design breakfast - Customer experience management on Demand, BIG Desi...
Service design breakfast - Customer experience management on Demand, BIG Desi...Service design breakfast - Customer experience management on Demand, BIG Desi...
Service design breakfast - Customer experience management on Demand, BIG Desi...
 
Presentación "Herramientas para vender más y mejora" Alejandro Castillo
Presentación "Herramientas para vender más y mejora" Alejandro CastilloPresentación "Herramientas para vender más y mejora" Alejandro Castillo
Presentación "Herramientas para vender más y mejora" Alejandro Castillo
 
Como inserir minha prescrição de medicamentos
Como inserir minha prescrição de medicamentosComo inserir minha prescrição de medicamentos
Como inserir minha prescrição de medicamentos
 
Banking 2.0
Banking 2.0Banking 2.0
Banking 2.0
 
Amputats
AmputatsAmputats
Amputats
 
How to land a graduate position in Novo Nordisk?
How to land a graduate position in Novo Nordisk?How to land a graduate position in Novo Nordisk?
How to land a graduate position in Novo Nordisk?
 
Microservices Architecture: Labs
Microservices Architecture: LabsMicroservices Architecture: Labs
Microservices Architecture: Labs
 
sistemas
sistemassistemas
sistemas
 
Map hike preview
Map hike previewMap hike preview
Map hike preview
 
575
575575
575
 
одинцово
одинцовоодинцово
одинцово
 
Prezi Target Audience
Prezi Target AudiencePrezi Target Audience
Prezi Target Audience
 
M.fitrah hi hukum(128)
M.fitrah hi hukum(128)M.fitrah hi hukum(128)
M.fitrah hi hukum(128)
 
Rådgivning i forandring
Rådgivning i forandringRådgivning i forandring
Rådgivning i forandring
 
Lowe's emy
Lowe's emyLowe's emy
Lowe's emy
 

Ähnlich wie Policy making for swarms

Networks, swarms and policy. The future of policy making in a complex systems...
Networks, swarms and policy. The future of policy making in a complex systems...Networks, swarms and policy. The future of policy making in a complex systems...
Networks, swarms and policy. The future of policy making in a complex systems...Alberto Cottica
 
Magazine 2 - Dinobusters! English magazine. November 2014.
Magazine 2 - Dinobusters! English magazine. November 2014.Magazine 2 - Dinobusters! English magazine. November 2014.
Magazine 2 - Dinobusters! English magazine. November 2014.Dinobusters
 
Thinking in networks – #RENAschool
Thinking in networks – #RENAschoolThinking in networks – #RENAschool
Thinking in networks – #RENAschoolAlberto Cottica
 
Engaging the Edge – Activating citizen experts for innovation that works
Engaging the Edge – Activating citizen experts for innovation that worksEngaging the Edge – Activating citizen experts for innovation that works
Engaging the Edge – Activating citizen experts for innovation that worksAlberto Cottica
 
Networks, swarms and policy: what collective intelligence means for policy ma...
Networks, swarms and policy: what collective intelligence means for policy ma...Networks, swarms and policy: what collective intelligence means for policy ma...
Networks, swarms and policy: what collective intelligence means for policy ma...Alberto Cottica
 
The power and necessity- of social innovation in our cities, Gigi Georges at...
The power  and necessity- of social innovation in our cities, Gigi Georges at...The power  and necessity- of social innovation in our cities, Gigi Georges at...
The power and necessity- of social innovation in our cities, Gigi Georges at...Social Innovation Exchange
 
Reframing Studio - Design for Inclusive Citizenship
Reframing Studio - Design for Inclusive CitizenshipReframing Studio - Design for Inclusive Citizenship
Reframing Studio - Design for Inclusive CitizenshipReframing Studio
 
Design and Emotion The Reframing workshop
Design and Emotion The Reframing workshop Design and Emotion The Reframing workshop
Design and Emotion The Reframing workshop Reframing Studio
 
Modern Art What Is The Thesis Statement In The Essay
Modern Art What Is The Thesis Statement In The EssayModern Art What Is The Thesis Statement In The Essay
Modern Art What Is The Thesis Statement In The EssayInell Campbell
 
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makersThinking in networks: what it means for policy makers
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makersAlberto Cottica
 
Globalization Essay Introduction
Globalization Essay IntroductionGlobalization Essay Introduction
Globalization Essay IntroductionJulie Songy
 
Valdis Krebs, Founder and Chief Scientist, orgnet.com 03-24-09 Interview
Valdis Krebs, Founder and Chief Scientist, orgnet.com 03-24-09 InterviewValdis Krebs, Founder and Chief Scientist, orgnet.com 03-24-09 Interview
Valdis Krebs, Founder and Chief Scientist, orgnet.com 03-24-09 InterviewBetsey Merkel
 
Movie Review Template
Movie Review TemplateMovie Review Template
Movie Review TemplateSusan Cox
 
Online conversation as foresight
Online conversation as foresightOnline conversation as foresight
Online conversation as foresightAlberto Cottica
 
Old Scroll Paper - ClipArt Best Paper Template, Baking, Clip Art
Old Scroll Paper - ClipArt Best Paper Template, Baking, Clip ArtOld Scroll Paper - ClipArt Best Paper Template, Baking, Clip Art
Old Scroll Paper - ClipArt Best Paper Template, Baking, Clip ArtWendy Boyd
 
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers – PDF 2014
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers – PDF 2014Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers – PDF 2014
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers – PDF 2014Alberto Cottica
 
Free Printable Writing Paper With Borders
Free Printable Writing Paper With BordersFree Printable Writing Paper With Borders
Free Printable Writing Paper With BordersMonica Rivera
 
Interview Essay Outline. Interview Essay Outline. 2
Interview Essay Outline. Interview Essay Outline. 2Interview Essay Outline. Interview Essay Outline. 2
Interview Essay Outline. Interview Essay Outline. 2Kelly Lipiec
 
The New Business Idea Of Cindy
The New Business Idea Of CindyThe New Business Idea Of Cindy
The New Business Idea Of CindyJill Ailts
 

Ähnlich wie Policy making for swarms (20)

Networks, swarms and policy. The future of policy making in a complex systems...
Networks, swarms and policy. The future of policy making in a complex systems...Networks, swarms and policy. The future of policy making in a complex systems...
Networks, swarms and policy. The future of policy making in a complex systems...
 
Magazine 2 - Dinobusters! English magazine. November 2014.
Magazine 2 - Dinobusters! English magazine. November 2014.Magazine 2 - Dinobusters! English magazine. November 2014.
Magazine 2 - Dinobusters! English magazine. November 2014.
 
Thinking in networks – #RENAschool
Thinking in networks – #RENAschoolThinking in networks – #RENAschool
Thinking in networks – #RENAschool
 
Engaging the Edge – Activating citizen experts for innovation that works
Engaging the Edge – Activating citizen experts for innovation that worksEngaging the Edge – Activating citizen experts for innovation that works
Engaging the Edge – Activating citizen experts for innovation that works
 
Networks, swarms and policy: what collective intelligence means for policy ma...
Networks, swarms and policy: what collective intelligence means for policy ma...Networks, swarms and policy: what collective intelligence means for policy ma...
Networks, swarms and policy: what collective intelligence means for policy ma...
 
The power and necessity- of social innovation in our cities, Gigi Georges at...
The power  and necessity- of social innovation in our cities, Gigi Georges at...The power  and necessity- of social innovation in our cities, Gigi Georges at...
The power and necessity- of social innovation in our cities, Gigi Georges at...
 
Reframing Studio - Design for Inclusive Citizenship
Reframing Studio - Design for Inclusive CitizenshipReframing Studio - Design for Inclusive Citizenship
Reframing Studio - Design for Inclusive Citizenship
 
Design and Emotion The Reframing workshop
Design and Emotion The Reframing workshop Design and Emotion The Reframing workshop
Design and Emotion The Reframing workshop
 
Modern Art What Is The Thesis Statement In The Essay
Modern Art What Is The Thesis Statement In The EssayModern Art What Is The Thesis Statement In The Essay
Modern Art What Is The Thesis Statement In The Essay
 
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makersThinking in networks: what it means for policy makers
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers
 
Globalization Essay Introduction
Globalization Essay IntroductionGlobalization Essay Introduction
Globalization Essay Introduction
 
Digital trends and us
Digital trends and usDigital trends and us
Digital trends and us
 
Valdis Krebs, Founder and Chief Scientist, orgnet.com 03-24-09 Interview
Valdis Krebs, Founder and Chief Scientist, orgnet.com 03-24-09 InterviewValdis Krebs, Founder and Chief Scientist, orgnet.com 03-24-09 Interview
Valdis Krebs, Founder and Chief Scientist, orgnet.com 03-24-09 Interview
 
Movie Review Template
Movie Review TemplateMovie Review Template
Movie Review Template
 
Online conversation as foresight
Online conversation as foresightOnline conversation as foresight
Online conversation as foresight
 
Old Scroll Paper - ClipArt Best Paper Template, Baking, Clip Art
Old Scroll Paper - ClipArt Best Paper Template, Baking, Clip ArtOld Scroll Paper - ClipArt Best Paper Template, Baking, Clip Art
Old Scroll Paper - ClipArt Best Paper Template, Baking, Clip Art
 
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers – PDF 2014
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers – PDF 2014Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers – PDF 2014
Thinking in networks: what it means for policy makers – PDF 2014
 
Free Printable Writing Paper With Borders
Free Printable Writing Paper With BordersFree Printable Writing Paper With Borders
Free Printable Writing Paper With Borders
 
Interview Essay Outline. Interview Essay Outline. 2
Interview Essay Outline. Interview Essay Outline. 2Interview Essay Outline. Interview Essay Outline. 2
Interview Essay Outline. Interview Essay Outline. 2
 
The New Business Idea Of Cindy
The New Business Idea Of CindyThe New Business Idea Of Cindy
The New Business Idea Of Cindy
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinIpsos France
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfSABC News
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (9)

Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
 

Policy making for swarms

  • 1. Policy making for swarms Alberto Cottica, Edgeryders – Big Picture Days, June 1st 2013 Hello, thank you all for showing up. I do research for a newly minted company called Edgeryders. The reason why the company even exists and why its business model looks the way it does itself has a lot to do with what we are going to be talking about today. But more on that later. We are here to talk about swarm coops, or whatever you want to call these unorthodox constellations of people in action. At the heart of this concept there is a fundamental paradox. Swarm coops derive their uncanny efficiency from radical decentralization of decision making and action; yet, decentralization might and does cause such action to develop in directions so different from what it had been intended to be as to be unrecognizable. I guess most of us will be turning around this paradox in their head. The main tool I am using to debunk this paradox is network theory: I conceptualize swarms as people in networks. In networks, nodes might be equal in the amount of top-down power over others, but they will typically be very unequal in terms of connectivity, hence the ability to spread information (including narratives and calls to action) across the network. Uneven connectivity adds some directionality to the swarm, in the sense that the most connected people get it to go their way most of the times. I am going to try and give you a perhaps slightly unusual perspective on swarm coops. I am a policy guy – public policy design (and some deployment) is what paid my bills for the last ten years. Public policy is generally understood as a top-down process: some leader somewhere makes a decision and that decision is enacted. Since the accepted modi operandi of public policy are encoded into law, such top-down thinking is hardwired into organizational charts, remits and procedures. A decision maker wanting to do things differently will not in generally be enough for things to happen differently. Think of this as an especially hard area to do swarms in. That’s not a bad thing for today’s purposes, because it provides us with a clean benchmark. If you can do it in the government, you can probably do it in most places. All this is very tentative. I can’t claim I know how to do this stuff. I mean, I do it, and it kind of works, but I am not sure exactly why, so I would be the first not to want to turn the revenue agency into a swarm just yet. In fact, the reason why I am here is that I hope you guys can help me make some progress. I am also going to assume you guys have been thinking into it as hard as I have, so I am giving you the full complexity of the argument. Stop me if I touch on something that does not make sense to you, or that you don’t know about.
  • 2. Iatrogenics: harm done by the healer Just a word on why public sector agencies might want to think in swarms. As our societies get ever more complex, they get ever more difficult to second guess. There is a real risk of what Nassim Taleb calls iatrogenics, harm done by the healer.
  • 3. 0 50 100 150 200 2007-2013 – Billion € 102 196 World Bank lending commitments Italy, strategic national framework pipeline The world 4 regions in Italy One of my favorite examples of that is with public spending. In my country, Italy, we have a situation. The north of the country is well-developed, with quite a strong manufacturing economy, whereas its south is lagging behind. This is a high political priority, and for at least fifty years we have thrown money and brains at it.
  • 4. 0 1750 3500 5250 7000 2007-2013 – per capita € 6057 32.7 The world 4 regions in Italy World Bank lending commitments Italy, strategic national framework pipeline The world The result is a huge pipeline concentrated on just four regions (the region is the most important spending authority in Italy). They have a very hard time even just making it happen – let alone ensuring proper monitoring.
  • 5. “Everyone was talking about public sector tenders.” – Tiago Dias Miranda in southern Italy, 2013 The result of this situation: smart, entrepreneurial young people in Italy’s Mezzogiorno are talking about public sector tenders. They know all the acronyms of European programs. And why not? Though most of the money ends up with networks of incumbents, even the crumbs can be quite a big payoff. But of course, in development terms, this is just a distraction: as they write funding applications, they are not starting companies, or leaving the country, or squatting buildings; they are not engaging in collective, trial-and-error discovery of the paths that lead to the healing of the economy. And in fact, the economy does not heal. The government means mostly well, but the amount of damage inflicted is terrifying. This is why I and others are exploring other ways. I am exploring the way of smart crowds, or swarms. It is not a bad thing to explore: if you are low on the public policy food chain, swarms give you an alternative power base.
  • 6. Public policies as a buyer’s market Photo: marsmet481 But doing policy in swarms has an immediate consequence: you need to recruit people, and those people do not work for you, do not take (much) money from you and need to be convinced.
  • 7. Photo: marsmet481 ... and that’s a big reality check right there. I believe this has given some competitive edge to my own projects. I just had to work harder to get ANYTHING off the ground.
  • 8. Photo: marsmet481 Falkvinge’s Law: lead by getting skin in the game So how to do it? Let’s start by what I am going to call Rick Falkvinge’s Law (in honor of the founder of the Swedish Pirate Party): leadership in a network is exerted from the front. You start by saying: “I am doing X. Who’s in?” This is more radical than it seems. Nassim Taleb has pointed out that modern society rewards non-risk takers (corporates, politicians, bureaucrats), and that this is new (Alexander the Great led his own charges etc.). Falkvinge’s Law restores the idea that risk-takers should be honored and rewarded.
  • 9. Interface: the fishing rod model Photo: Joel Obrecht You are going to need an interface – in fact, probably several layers. Governments are Weberian bureaucracies for very good accountability reasons. Swarms are very clearly not. So you need some smart relaying between the inside of the government agency and the outside, with the swarm having some kind of legitimacy without being subject to the hard constraints of public servants. It’s like a fishing rod, thick and rigid atthe handle, but thin and flexible towards the end.
  • 10. Timing: get friends to start the bandwagon Photo: flod Scholars of swarms, social networks etc. focus typically on the behavior of the formed swarm. But if you’ve ever tried it, you know that the hardest part is to kickstart one. We need a much better developed embryology of swarms. Me, the better method I know is still to leverage trust network of friends. This is how Vinay jumpstarted Big Picture Days: he wrote an email to twenty people trying to get the first, say, six to commit. Then, he could tell everyone “You don’t want to miss this cool event. Why, Alberto Cottica is coming!”. Even if you don’t know who the hell Alberto Cottica is, such a call works with the deep wiring of human psychology. We have plenty of experimental psychology results around that by now.
  • 11. Randomness: shake things up (hence parties) Photo: Medhin Paolos You are making policy because someone perceives a situation that is not fixing itself. Rather than going in with a heavy intervention (traditional economists will “maximize the welfare function” and push the economy towards the maximum), which is iatrogenetic, you can simply shake things up a little bit to see if the system gets unstuck from its present undesirable attractor and starts moving towards a better one. Complexity thinking has given us, among other things, an attractive theory of innovation based on generative relationships: innovation stems from people being similar enough that they can communicate well, but different enough to give each other mild cognitive shocks, inducing new ways to look upon things. It is not hard to assess the generative potential of a relationship, but it impossible to predict in advance which potentially generative relationships will actually lead to breakthroughs. So, I just like to throw parties. Curated parties increase the number of new connections in your network and therefore, in probability, the number of new things being tried. This, in turn, increases the probability of your situation unmooring from where it had been stuck. And no iatrogenics. Win!
  • 12. Transparency: requests for comments Photo: Elena Trombetta I find a radically transparent behavior to be advantageous when running a swarm: it’s a buyers market, and you need to win trust. Transparency also doubles up as a management tool: most people will just appreciate that you are being honest about, for example, how much money you spend and on what, but occasionally somebody pays close attention and ends up making useful suggestions. If you have to fight a narrative of public policy as corrupt and self-referential (I do) transparency is an amazingly effective tool in reducing conflict and suspicion.
  • 13. TIme bombs: zero entrenchment Many swarms tend to lose their magic after a while – the mavericks of the early days get suitified, their project becomes a job or what have you. I like to build time bombs in my projects: if a swarm is active enough, it will find a way to survive it. In fact my company, Edgeryders, formed with the intention of providing a new core to a community that assembled around a public sector project I used to direct. The project ended, but some of us felt the community was too good to pass on, so we decided to build a small organization to provide it with the scaffolding initially provided by the public sector project.
  • 14. Efficiency: don’t touch the wicked problem Photo: Alberto Cottica When you are doing stuff with a swarm and it appears to be working, outside people will try to get it onto problems they care about. I try to resist this. It implies a revision of the social contract, which tends to be conflictual: also, it might destroy that feeling of effortless impact that core community members find intoxicating. Generally, bad idea.
  • 15. Trust: no strings attached (even give people cash) Photo: Maxymedia Control is costly and boring. Relinquishing it, and rather focusing on enabling people to take initiative makes you save a lot of time and money, and is a huge motivator, as people feel empowered and trusted. If you can, you should give people a little cash with no strings attached. There is a recent Ugandan study that provides evidence that, even without swarms, even giving money to young rural poor results in increased hours worked and increased income for the people in question.
  • 16. Measure: do you have enough complexity? Photo: Maxymedia To do this stuff, you need a minimum of complexity. A nail does not evolve; you can’t jumpstart a swarm in your family, and you probably can’t in a village either. In the natural world, complexity has mathematical signatures that scientists can look for. Swarms that do most of the heavy lifting online leave behind them a trail of data that you can search for self-organizing behavior. I am personally involved in an effort to find cheap, quick methods to investigate the matter. If you care about this, we should definitely speak, there’s not many of us out there.
  • 17. Dogfood: eat your own (and we do) Photo: NikonColucci Edgeryders eats its own dogfood. It is a pretty unique case of a company that grew out of a community that grew out of a public sector project. The company exists to provide the scaffolding for the community to stay connected; and to empower community members to jumpstart cool projects that benefit everyone, like the unMonastery.
  • 18. So,what do you think?

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Hello, thank you all for showing up. I do research for a newly minted company called Edgeryders. The reason why the company even exists and why its business model looks the way it does itself has a lot to do with what we are going to be talking about today. But more on that later. We are here to talk about swarm coops, or whatever you want to call these unorthodox constellations of people in action. At the heart of this concept there is a fundamental paradox. Swarm coops derive their uncanny efficiency from radical decentralization of decision making and action; yet, decentralization might and does cause such action to develop in directions so different from what it had been intended to be as to be unrecognizable. I guess most of us will be turning around this paradox in their head. The main tool I am using to debunk this paradox is network theory: I conceptualize swarms as people in networks. In networks, nodes might be equal in the amount of top-down power over others, but they will typically be very unequal in terms of connectivity, hence the ability to spread information (including narratives and calls to action) across the network. Uneven connectivity adds some directionality to the swarm, in the sense that the most connected people get it to go their way most of the times. I am going to try and give you a perhaps slightly unusual perspective on swarm coops. I am a policy guy – public policy design (and some deployment) is what paid my bills for the last ten years. Public policy is generally understood as a top-down process: some leader somewhere makes a decision and that decision is enacted. Since the accepted modi operandi of public policy are encoded into law, such top-down thinking is hardwired into organizational charts, remits and procedures. A decision maker wanting to do things differently will not in generally be enough for things to happen differently. Think of this as an especially hard area to do swarms in. That’s not a bad thing for today’s purposes, because it provides us with a clean benchmark. If you can do it in the government, you can probably do it in most places. All this is very tentative. I can’t claim I know how to do this stuff. I mean, I do it, and it kind of works, but I am not sure exactly why, so I would be the first not to want to turn the revenue agency into a swarm just yet. In fact, the reason why I am here is that I hope you guys can help me make some progress. I am also going to assume you guys have been thinking into it as hard as I have, so I am giving you the full complexity of the argument. Stop me if I touch on something that does not make sense to you, or that you don’t know about.
  2. Just a word on why public sector agencies might want to think in swarms. As our societies get ever more complex, they get ever more difficult to second guess. There is a real risk of what Nassim Taleb calls iatrogenics, harm done by the healer.
  3. One of my favorite examples of that is with public spending. In my country, Italy, we have a situation. The north of the country is well-developed, with quite a strong manufacturing economy, whereas its south is lagging behind. This is a high political priority, and for at least fifty years we have thrown money and brains at it.
  4. The result is a huge pipeline concentrated on just four regions (the region is the most important spending authority in Italy). They have a very hard time even just making it happen – let alone ensuring proper monitoring.
  5. The result of this situation: smart, entrepreneurial young people in Italy’s Mezzogiorno are talking about public sector tenders. They know all the acronyms of European programs. And why not? Though most of the money ends up with networks of incumbents, even the crumbs can be quite a big payoff. But of course, in development terms, this is just a distraction: as they write funding applications, they are not starting companies, or leaving the country, or squatting buildings; they are not engaging in collective, trial-and-error discovery of the paths that lead to the healing of the economy. And in fact, the economy does not heal. The government means mostly well, but the amount of damage inflicted is terrifying. This is why I and others are exploring other ways. I am exploring the way of smart crowds, or swarms. It is not a bad thing to explore: if you are low on the public policy food chain, swarms give you an alternative power base.
  6. But doing policy in swarms has an immediate consequence: you need to recruit people, and those people do not work for you, do not take (much) money from you and need to be convinced.
  7. ... and that’s a big reality check right there. I believe this has given some competitive edge to my own projects. I just had to work harder to get ANYTHING off the ground.
  8. So how to do it? Let’s start by what I am going to call Rick Falkvinge’s law: leadership in a network is exerted from the front. You start by saying: “I am doing X. Who’s in?” This is more radical than it seems. Nassim Taleb has pointed out that modern society rewards non-risk takers (corporates, politicians, bureaucrats), and that this is new (Alexander the Great led his own charges etc.). Falkvinge’s Law restores the idea that risk-takers should be honored and rewarded.
  9. You are going to need an interface – in fact, probably several layers. Governments are Weberian bureaucracies for very good accountability reasons. Swarms are very clearly not. So you need some smart relaying between the inside of the government agency and the outside, with the swarm having some kind of legitimacy without being subject to the hard constraints of public servants. It’s like a fishing rod, thick and rigid atthe handle, but thin and flexible towards the end.
  10. Scholars of swarms, social networks etc. focus typically on the behavior of the formed swarm. But if you’ve ever tried it, you know that the hardest part is to kickstart one. We need a much better developed embryology of swarms. Me, the better method I know is still to leverage trust network of friends. This is how Vinay jumpstarted Big Picture Days: he wrote an email to twenty people trying to get the first, say, six to commit. Then, he could tell everyone “You don’t want to miss this cool event. Why, Alberto Cottica is coming!”. Even if you don’t know who the hell Alberto Cottica is, such a call works with the deep wiring of human psychology. We have plenty of experimental psychology results around that by now.
  11. You are making policy because someone perceives a situation that is not fixing itself. Rather than going in with a heavy intervention (traditional economists will “maximize the welfare function” and push the economy towards the maximum), which is iatrogenetic, you can simply shake things up a little bit to see if the system gets unstuck from its present undesirable attractor and starts moving towards a better one. Complexity thinking has given us, among other things, an attractive theory of innovation based on generative relationships: innovation stems from people being similar enough that they can communicate well, but different enough to give each other mild cognitive shocks, inducing new ways to look upon things. It is not hard to assess the generative potential of a relationship, but it impossible to predict in advance which potentially generative relationships will actually lead to breakthroughs. So, I just like to throw parties. Curated parties increase the number of new connections in your network and therefore, in probability, the number of new things being tried. This, in turn, increases the probability of your situation unmooring from where it had been stuck. And no iatrogenics. Win!
  12. I find a radically transparent behavior to be advantageous when running a swarm: it’s a buyers market, and you need to win trust. Transparency also doubles up as a management tool: most people will just appreciate that you are being honest about, for example, how much money you spend and on what, but occasionally somebody pays close attention and ends up making useful suggestions. If you have to fight a narrative of public policy as corrupt and self-referential (I do) transparency is an amazingly effective tool in reducing conflict and suspicion.
  13. Many swarms tend to lose their magic after a while – the mavericks of the early days get suitified, their project becomes a job or what have you. I like to build time bombs in my projects: if a swarm is active enough, it will find a way to survive it. In fact my company, Edgeryders, formed with the intention of providing a new core to a community that assembled around a public sector project I used to direct. The project ended, but some of us felt the community was too good to pass on, so we decided to build a small organization to provide it with the scaffolding initially provided by the public sector project.
  14. When you are doing stuff with a swarm and it appears to be working, outside people will try to get it onto problems they care about. I try to resist this. It implies a revision of the social contract, which tends to be conflictual: also, it might destroy that feeling of effortless impact that core community members find intoxicating. Generally, bad idea.
  15. Control is costly and boring. Relinquishing it, and rather focusing on enabling people to take initiative makes you save a lot of time and money, and is a huge motivator, as people feel empowered and trusted. If you can, you should give people a little cash with no strings attached. There is a recent Ugandan study that provides evidence that, even without swarms, even giving money to young rural poor results in increased hours worked and increased income for the people in question.
  16. To do this stuff, you need a minimum of complexity. A nail does not evolve; you can’t jumpstart a swarm in your family, and you probably can’t in a village either. In the natural world, complexity has mathematical signatures that scientists can look for. Swarms that do most of the heavy lifting online leave behind them a trail of data that you can search for self-organizing behavior. I am personally involved in an effort to find cheap, quick methods to investigate the matter. If you care about this, we should definitely speak, there’s not many of us out there.