The document discusses identifying good journalism and discusses principles of journalism such as accuracy, balance, and fairness. It asks questions about whether something is good journalism by examining if the information is verified, helps citizens, and involves citizens. It also asks if news needs to be amusing and relevant at the same time. It discusses how the business of television is changing broadcast news.

3. Broadcast Journalism, Part II How do you know when it’s good?

5. That applies to all journalism, not just broadcast.

6. Remember: just because it is on TV or in print doesn’t make it good .

7. Remember: just because it is on TV or in print doesn’t make it good .

8. Any dumbass can be on television.

9. Any dumbass can be on television.

12. So how do you know if it is good or not?

13. Accuracy, balance and fairness.

14. Accuracy, balance and fairness. But those things are all subjective , aren’t they?

17. Birds? Is it good journalism?

19. So, was it good journalism?

21. Did the reporter interpret the story for you?

23. Why did you laugh?

24. You need to be good consumers of the news. Because that is what local news has devolved to: It makes you laugh .

26. How would you classify this? Is online television the same as broadcast television? http://www.philly.com/philly/travel/shoreguide/

27. Was that entertainment or news? It was produced by an award winning producer at philly.com.

28. Is it any different from other media?

29. Is it any different from other media?

30. Is it any different from other media?

31. Is it any different from other media?

32. Is it any different from other media?

33. The business of television is changing broadcast news. People are desperate for eyes.

34. What’s next? Anything is possible. http://twoguysonbeer.com/