TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
Presentation Ii Betty Version3
1. Chia Ying Betty Hu Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu Date: November 17, 2009 Do Chinese students’ perceptions of test value affect test performance? Mediating role of motivational and metacognitive regulation in test preparation
2. Hong, E., & Pen, Y., (2008). Do Chinese students’ perceptions of test value affect test performance? Mediating role of motivational and metacognitive regulation in test preparation. Learning and Instruction 18, 499-512.
9. Hypotheses students who hold strong test value would perceive themselves as regulating motivation and using metacognitive strategies more than those who hold weak test value The relationship of test value to perceived motivational and metacognitive regulation would be weaker in older students than in younger students, as older students’ test value and perceived self-regulatory behaviors are more likely in the process of changing toward declination Students’ perceived test value had a significant direct effect on motivation and metacognitive regulation. H1 H2
10. Hypotheses Test value would have an effect on test performance through the mediation of self-regulation, but not directly when mediating variables are included in the model. Students who report regulating motivation during test preparation would score higher in tests than those who regulate less. Test value also had a significant indirect effect on test performance. Motivational regulation had a significant direct effect on test performance . H3 H4
11.
12. Hypotheses The relationship of perceived motivational regulation and test performance would be weaker in older students due to inconsistent use of strategies during test preparation as compared to younger students The relationship between perceived motivational and metacognitive regulation would be positive and strong The correlation between the motivation and metacognition disturbances was statistically significant Motivational regulation had a significant direct effect on test performance . Although the structural coefficients were both statistically significant in each grade level , they were not invariant . X H7 H8
13. Methodology Participant 7 grade ( 6 classes) 11 grade ( 6 Classes) 11 grade ( 4 Classes) 7 grade ( 2 Classes) C B D A
16. Self-Assessment Questionnaire- Test and test preparation Measuring Effort (Eff) Persistence (Per) Measuring Planning (Pl) Self-Checking (SC) Strategy Selection (SS) Test Value in the Future Life(Val-f) Measuring Test Value in Learning (Val-l)
21. Motivational regulation Metacognitive regulation .63** (.51)** ns (ns) . 47** (.42)** .38** (.18)* . 74** (.56)** Motivational regulation had a significant direct effect on test performance The correlation between the motivation and metacognition disturbances was statistically significant Students’ perceived test value had a significant direct effect on motivational regulation Students’ perceived test value had a significant direct effect on metacognitive regulation Perceived test value Test performance metacognitive regulation did not demonstrate a significant effect on test performance in both grades