Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (13)
Similar to Co2cut
Similar to Co2cut (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Co2cut
- 2. CO2cut.com is an online tool: Its purpose is to reduce global carbon emissions AT NO COST to the user. CO2cut connects multi-billion dollar e- c ommerce and carbon markets. Wh o we are ?
- 3. What we do? $100 $ 6 0-70 … $30- 4 0
- 5. Market (World) $86 billion carbon market size (2008) (The World Bank estimate 2009) 875 million people shop online (2007) (Nielsen Consumer Report, February 2008)
- 6. Market (U.S.) 114 million Americans (38%) think that ‘ global warming will pose a serious threat to the m and their way of life during their lifetime’ (2009) (Gallup.com 5-8/09) $251 billion e-commerce market size (2007) (retail $127 b n , services $124 b n ) (U.S. Census Bureau, May 28, 2009)
- 7. U.S. market potential 2 million CO2cut users that is projected 2 % of the ~100 million Americans concerned about global warming and using Internet $116 million CO2cut revenue annual revenue from the CO2cut users ’ (retail and services ) referral fees
- 8. CO2cut advantages Position First, globally Team Diversified skills, backgrounds Brand Recognizable, #1 index at Google Software B eta works with Amazon Design Simple, user- friendly
- 10. www.co2cut.com
Editor's Notes
- Change the bottom to a footer with slide numbers for every slide
- Who we are without a question mark or we put Who are we? Should you add carbon ‘dioxide’? Members- plural. May want to put ‘combatting deforestation, renewable energy, and agricultural development (which I dont really like)
- This slide looks great! Is it clear enough what the ~3-4% signifies?
- Natasa put the red, i changed the abbreviation
- Natasa put the red, i changed the abbreviation
- Ca. Not cca to match, ‘a’ serious threat, if ‘during their lifetime’ part of the research figures, good to italicize
- You put 5% here and 6% in red in slide 3. potentian in 3-5 years! But 114m today in sl 5 down to 100m 3-5 years from now??? Maybe you should not say 3-5 years on the slide and take out ‘probably using Internet’. Revenue sentence
- You put 5% here and 6% in red in slide 3. potentian in 3-5 years! But 114m today in sl 5 down to 100m 3-5 years from now??? Maybe you should not say 3-5 years on the slide and take out ‘probably using Internet’. Revenue sentence
- I could change this if you want: Staff: Office / Personel / Travel: Marketing / Research % Development: Total: etc.....