![Objectives: ,[object Object],[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Ähnlich wie Vertical Scale Scores
Ähnlich wie Vertical Scale Scores (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Vertical Scale Scores
- 1. Texas Project Measure and Vertical Scale Scores
- 3. ACCOUNTABILITY IS LIKE… BECAUSE…
- 7. State Assessment Performance Standards (AEIS) 2009 and Beyond Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 Included Tests TAKS + TAKS-Acc TAKS + TAKS-Acc TAKS + TAKS-Acc (All Grades/ Subjects) TAKS + TAKS-Acc + TAKS-M + TAKS-Alt Standards AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex AA/Re/Ex Reading/ELA 70 /75/90 70/ 75 /90 70/ 80 /90 70/80/90 Writing 65/75/90 70 / 75 /90 70/ 80 /90 70/80/90 Social Studies 65/75/90 70 / 75 /90 70/ 80 /90 70/80/90 Mathematics 50 / 75/90 55 / 75 /90 60 / 80 /90 65/ 80/90 Science 45 /7 5/90 50 / 75 /90 55 / 80 /90 60 /80/90
- 9. Pressure is a word that is misused in our vocabulary. When you start thinking of pressure, it’s because you’ve started thinking of failure. Tommy Lasorda, Former L.A. Dodgers Manager
- 10. VSS vs. TPM
- 16. Projections From and To…
- 17. TPM Process
- 18. TPM Calculations – What’s Included?
- 22. VSS Student Identified Groups
- 26. The key is not the will to win…everybody has that. It is the will to prepare to win that is important. Bobby Knight, Texas Tech Men’s Basketball Coach
- 27. Having an above average teacher for five years running can completely close the average gap between low-income students and others. - John Kain and Eric Hanushek
- 30. ‘ Passing & Preparedness’
- 31. Regional College Ready Graduates November’s AEIS Reports will reflect the class of 2008. All Af Am Hisp White Asian Male Female Eco Dis LEP ELA 52% 40% 47% 63% 67% 47% 57% 42% 4% Math 56% 35% 45% 69% 73% 58% 48% 40% 22% Both 37% 23% 29% 53% 58% 38% 37% 24% 3%
- 34. 2100 – Met Standard 2400 – Commended Performance Approximate Range: 1200 – 3300 These are consistent for all grades and subjects where the horizontal scale score is used. Met Standard and Commended Performance - vary by subject and grade (See page 4 of the guide.) Approximate Range: 0 – 1000 New
- 38. Academic Achievement Standards Scale Score Results Are Used To Determine the Student’s Level of Achievement
- 40. Why Vertical Scale Scores?
- 41. If you don’t have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over? John Wooden, Former UCLA Men’s Basketball Coach
- 42. VSS Calculations
- 43. Reading and Mathematics Vertical Scale Scores
- 47. Graphing Scores
- 50. What about these Students? Susan 3 rd -2008 4 th -2009 5 th -2010 6 th -2011 Reading 680 725 750 770 Math 550 570 630 644 Maria 5 th -2008 6 th -2009 7 th -2010 8 th -2011 Reading 620 640 675 700 Math 610 637 665 700 Michael 4 th -2008 5 th -2009 6 th -2010 7 th -2011 Reading 780 800 834 850 Math 725 760 795 823 Frank 3 rd -2008 4 th -2009 5 th -2010 6 th -2011 Reading 400 480 600 650 Math 400 475 550 630
- 53. Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion. You must set yourself on fire. Fred Shero, Former Philadelphia Flyers Coach
- 54. “ When I die, I want to go peacefully and quietly in my sleep like my grandfather did… not screaming and shouting like the passengers in his car at the time.”
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Refer participants to the “Accountability Standards 2009-2011” document in their binder. Let’s look at the information contained in this document. This slide reflects the accountability standards for academic performance on the TAKs. The top portion of your document, the TAKS indicator, is the percentage of students who scored high enough to meet the standard to pass the test. Results of the TAKS (grades 3-11) are summed across grade levels for each subject. Results for each subject are evaluated separately to determine ratings. As the chart on your document and this slide shows, the academically acceptable standard varies by subject while the recognized and exemplary standards are the same for all subjects. Note where the standards for recognized and acceptable will increase this year. This is noted in red on the slide.
- Continue to refer participants to the “Accountability Standards 2009-2011” document in their binder. Another component of the state accountability system is the annual dropout rate. For accountability purposes, the annual dropout rate is used to evaluate campuses and districts with students in grades 7 and/or 8. This is a one year measure calculated by summing the numbers of dropouts across the two grades. As this slide shows the 2010 standard is 1.8% or less for all rating categories. Since the 2007 rating cycle, dropouts have been determined based on Texas’ new, more rigorous, dropout definition, which is aligned with the federal definition of a dropout. The definition is “A dropout is a student who was enrolled in 2007-2008 in a TX public school in grades 7 -12 but did not return to a TX public school the following fall within the ‘school start window’, was not expelled, did not graduate, receive a GED, continue high school outside the TX public school system, or begin college, or die." The current year’s accountability rating is based on the drop-outs from 1 year ago. For instance if a campus that serves grades 7-8 exceeds 2% drop-out rate from their 2007-08 school year data that school will be designated academically unacceptable in 2009. Another important note – this year the requirement is that students be enrolled by Sept 25 th (the last Friday in September which is the end of the “School Start Window.”)