💕SONAM KUMAR💕Premium Call Girls Jaipur ↘️9257276172 ↙️One Night Stand With Lo...
Harm reduction Thunder Bay Ontario
1. Dispelling the Myths: The White
Tape of Harm Reduction
Greg Riehl December 5th, 2012
Thunder Bay District Health Unit
2. • Define harm reduction
• Identify the goals of harm reduction
• Explore harm reduction among key populations
• Identify myths and misconceptions
• Values, choice, culture and harm reduction.
• Discuss your role with harm reduction
Objectives
3. • Practical non-judgemental services that seek to
minimize drug related harm to the individual in
society
• Originated in Amsterdam and UK in the 1980s by
drug users themselves in response to rising HIV
rates
• Needle exchange, Methadone maintenance
• Abstinence is one of many strategies and services
that can be provided.
Harm Reduction
4. International Harm Reduction Association (2002):
“Policies and programs which attempt primarily to
reduce the adverse health, social and economic
consequences of mood altering substances to
individual drug users, their families and communities,
without requiring decrease in drug use”.
Harm Reduction
(As cited in Ministry of Health, 2005)
5. A neutral, non judgmental, low
threshold approach, geared
towards individual attributes and
context as well as social factors of
behavior and potential risk for
harm
Keane, 2003; Hathaway, 2002; Erikson, 2001
Harm Reduction
6. The GOAL of harm reduction
is to help users make
informed decisions and
empower themselves to
reduce the potential harm
from drug use.
7. Principles of Harm Reduction
• Humanistic Values
• Focus on Harms
• Priority of Immediate Goals
• Pragmatism
• Balancing costs and benefits to individuals and
society
Ministry of Health, 2005
Beirness, Jesseman, Notarandrea & Perron,
2008
8. More About Harm Reduction
• Reduces sharing of needles
• Saves lives by reducing drug-related health risks.
• Improves quality of life
• Reduces the spread of HIV
• Reduces OD deaths
• Opportunity for education and referrals
Health Canada, 2001
15. National Anti-Drug Strategy
•Government of Canada Launches New Anti-drug
Campaign: New Ads Latest in Effort to Help Parents
Keep their Children Drug-free
•This was October 2007
Knowledge does not equal behaviour change
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/media/nr-cp/_2010/2010_196-eng.php
http://www.nationalantidrugstrategy.gc.ca/sp-dis/2007_10_04_1.html
16. • There is a disconnect with what is being said and
what is being practiced
• Compare federal, provincial, regional, local
practices.
• Who decides what we do? Unfortunately not our
clients.
Cultural Disconnect
17. “We have major concerns with some of the initiatives,
falling under the banner of Harm Reduction, that do
not include abstinence as a goal. Rather than reduce,
they only prolong the misery caused by addiction.
Whereas, properly funded, prevention and
abstinence-based treatment programs actually reduce
the number of people addicted and the related
harms.”
C.D.(Chuck) Doucette President
Drug Prevention Network of Canada
Drug Prevention Network of Canada
Prevention Education Treatment
18. Nature of Harm Reduction
• Harm reduction is not a black & white subject
• Harm reduction is not something you either know or
don’t know
• Harm reduction involves thinking and feeling, study
and practice, knowledge and intuition
19. Harm Reduction Does Not…
• Provide rules of ethical or moral behavior for
every circumstance
• Offer guidance about which values should take
priority or how they can be balanced in practice
20. When Do Values Collide?
• When one’s personal, professional or
institutional values conflict
• When an individual’s values conflict with
the values of another individual
21. MYTHS
• HR enables drug use and encourages drug use among non-
drug users
• HR drains resources from treatment services
• HR increases disorder and threatens public safety and
health
BC Community Guide, 2005
22. Saskatchewan Registered Nurses’ Association:
“Focus is on the assumption that harms
associated with certain behaviours can be
reduced without the elimination of the
behaviour”
Harm Reductionists accept abstinence as
a goal along a continuum…
SRNA Position Statement, 2008
23. Nurses have a responsibility to provide non-
judgmental care to individuals and families affected
by substance use, regardless of setting, social class,
income, age, gender or ethnicity, and they can
influence the development of organizational and
governmental harm reduction policies related to drug
use.
CNA CANAC
Joint Position Statement
24. 4 Pillars
Treatment
Prevention • Improve physical,
emotional, and
• Prevent or delay onset.
psychological health
Harm Reduction Enforcement
• Reduce harms for • Strengthen community
individuals, families, and safety by responding to
communities. crimes and community
disorder issues.
25. Harm Reduction Strategies
Related to Drug Use
• Needle exchange
• Supervised injection sites
• Methadone
• Street outreach programs
• Safe crack pipe programs
Beirness, Jesseman, Notarandrea, & Perron, 2008
26. • Methadone Reduces
• Illicit opiate use
• Overdose deaths
• Frequency of injecting
• Needle sharing
• HIV/HCV/HBV transmission
• Criminal activity, recidivism
T Kerr, R Jürgens. Methadone Maintenance Therapy in Prisons: Reviewing the Evidence. Montreal: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network,
2004.
Substitution Therapy
27. • Assess patients fully and ask about their use, how they support their
use, &if they are withdrawing
• It isn’t your life, so avoid judgment
• Manage withdrawal properly –withdrawal is a MEDICAL
EMERGENCY
• Set realistic boundaries
• Understand the impact of trauma, pain and anxiety
• Ask patients to tell you if they use
• Don’t punish patients for using
• Keep the door open
• Be clear about what patients can expect from you & what you expect
from them
“They may have made some bad choices but your job is to
look after their needs” Remember Maslow????
Substance Use and Care
28. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Where is your client
at right now?
Social Determinants of Health
Maslow's hierarchy of needs and subpersonality work, Kenneth Sørensen
http://two.not2.org/psychosynthesis/articles/maslow.htm
29. • Aboriginal injection drug users are the fastest
growing group of new HIV cases in Canada.
• An estimated 6,380 Aboriginal people were living
with HIV (including AIDS) in Canada at the end of
2011 (8.9% of all prevalent HIV infections) which
represents an increase of 17.3% from the 2008
estimate of 5,440.
• The estimated prevalence rate among Aboriginal
people in Canada in 2011 was 544.0 per 100,000
population.
Epi in First Nations
30. Risk Factors for HIV in First Nations
• Injection Drug Use
• Unsafe sex
• Many sexual partners
• Sexual and physical abuse
• Incarceration
• Alcohol Abuse
• Lack of knowledge
• Low self esteem
• Residential school syndrome
• Loss of culture and spirituality
All Nations Hope, 2002
Joining the Circle, CAAN
31. •Culturally appropriate services
•There is a lack of harm reduction services to First Nations
(rural and on-reserve)
Wardman & Quartz, 2006 & Dell & Lyons, 2007)
“Programs and services for First Nations, Métis and Inuit people must
‘first and foremost, show respect and honour for all Aboriginal beliefs,
practices and customs’ and reflect the ‘pride and dignity that
Aboriginal heritage demands”
Culture and Harm Reduction
32. • Not all harm reduction measures are applicable to all people,
groups, or communities.
• Many Aboriginal communities adhere to models of abstinence
and prohibition and do not allow for moderate substance use.
• Stigma and discrimination
• Absence of services
Dell & Lyons, 2007
33. Community and Public Health
• What is your role in providing care,
treatment, and support for those who use
illicit drugs and are at risk for contracting .
• Nurses have a duty to provide safe,
competent, ethical care.
• Protect dignity and choice
• Enact social justice
CNA, 2007
34. Population Health Approach
• Consider underlying conditions that put people at risk of using,
abusing, and misusing drugs (ie. marginalization, poor support
networks, lack of access to health services, poor coping skills).
• Consider determinants of health:
Income and social status
Social support networks
Education
Employment
Coping skills
Culture
Physical environments
Health services Health Canada, 2001
35. What Can
YOU Do?
• HIV and HCV are PREVENTABLE
• Consider harm reduction within framework of
providing medical care
• goal is to minimize harm with a patient-first
approach
• maximize intervention options
• Knowledge ≠ behaviour
36. Summary
• As health care practitioners, we must provide culturally
competent care to our clients and citizens of our
communities.
• Western culture tends to blame the victim.
• Harm reduction can improve the quality of people’s lives.
• Some people are faced with several risk factors that put them
at risk for harm.
• We need to implement cultural elements when working with
our clients and with our partners.
37. “Ultimately we know deeply that the other side of
every fear is a freedom.”
Marilyn Ferguson
39. References
• All Nations Hope AIDS Network. (2002). Harm reduction in Saskatchewan: A resource guide. Regina, SK:
Author.
• Beirness, D.J., Jesseman, R., Notarandrea, R., & Perron, M. (2008). Harm reduction: What’s in a name? Ottawa,
ON: Canadian Centre of Substance Abuse.
• British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. (2003). The needs of someone living with HIV. Vancouver: Author.
• Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network. (2007). Walk with me pathways to health: Harm reduction service delivery
model. Ottawa: Author.
• Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network. Joining the Circle: An Aboriginal harm reduction model. Retrieved July 10 th,
2008 from http://www.healingourspirit.org/pdfs/publications/joincircle.pdf
• Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange. (2007). Study looks at underlying causes of HIV, hepatitis C
and substance use in Aboriginal youth. Retrieved July 8, 2008 from
http://www.catie.ca/catienews.nsf/news/F78C7BC9B71F09388525733100608E31?OpenDocument
• Canadian Nurses’ Association. (2007). Promoting equity through harm reduction in nursing practice. Ottawa:
Author
• Dell, C. A., & Lyons, T. (2007). Harm reduction policies and programs for persons of Aboriginal descent.
Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
• Health Canada. (2001). Reducing the harm associated with injection drug use in Canada. Ottawa: Author.
• Health Canada. (2001). Harm reduction and injection drug use: An international comparative study of contextual
factors influencing the development and implementation of relevant policies and programs. Ottawa: Author.
• International Harm Reduction Association. (2002).
• Ministry of Health. (2005). Harm reduction: A British Columbia community guide. British Columbia: Author.
• McLeod, A. (2004). As the wheel turns: The HIV/AIDS medicine wheel. The Positive Side, 6(4), 14-16.
• Saskatchewan Registered Nurses’ Association. (2008). SRNA position statement: Promoting equity through harm
reduction in nursing practice. Regina: Author.
• Wardman, D. & Quantz, D. (2006). Harm reduction services for British Columbia’s First Nation population: A
qualitative inquiry into opportunities and barriers for injection drug users. Harm Reduction Journal, 3(30), 1-
6.
Hinweis der Redaktion
*For seminar* Think about this: type II diabetes is a chronic medical condition that threatens those who are obese and have a sedentary lifestyle. Few people object to providing them with medication. Medication does not cure the condition, but the primary goal of treatment is to reduce the likelihood of secondary diseases (CV disease, retinopathy, neuropathy, etc). Losing weight and exercise is recommended but not everyone is successful in doing so. Compare that to your view of distributing condoms to prevent unwanted pregnancy and the spread of HIV. What’s the difference? What about seatbelts, bike helmets? Again, the goal is to reduce injury or harm.
There are several ways to define HR. It’s main goal is to reduce or minimize adverse health and social consequences associated with (in this case) drug use. Important to know that it doesn’t mean the discontinuation of drug use.
Translation: treating people as they are, providing education and options to reduce the harm associated with behavior (without changing behavior itself) I believe in the platinum rule. The golden rule states that we should treat other people how we want to be treated. The platinum rule treats other people how they want to be treated. And this is important when working with diverse population groups.
Our culture doesn’t look at the larger picture when it comes to substance abuse. We tend to focus on the individual and their problem instead of looking further. (victim blaming) Drug users are seen as “bad” and “it is their fault they are in that situation” In all drug users, we need to understand WHY, especially in FN peoples because of their past (abuse, residential schools, etc).
Humanistic Values – no moral judgements are made about the drug user. Acknowledgement of the respect of the dignity and the rights of the individual (CCSA, 2008). Focus on Harms – reduce the harms resulting from drug use rather than focusing on the extent of the drug use. The objective is to reduce the harmful consequences of drug use to the individual and others. Priority of Immediate goals – the most pressing, achievable and realistic goals are focused on first and are the first steps to a risk-free drug use. Starts with “where the person is”. Pragmatism – the improve the drug related harms short term rather than attempting to get the user to abstain completely. SRNA (in their 2008 pos’n statement) also includes autonomy, flexibility and maximization of intervention options, responsibility, education, dignity and advocacy.
- Insite reported 500 overdoses with no fatalities. On the street, these people would have most likely died.
Y do I believe in Harm Reduction is not the question. The real/riehl question is why don't I believe in abstinence. Treatment. Detox. List a bunch. B/c of the plat Rule. We r all different. Some of us R similar.
Concurrent Remanded HEP C 22 times higher and HIV 11times higher than general population Safer tattooing pilot program – 29,000 for HIV inmate and 26 000 hep c inmate treatment per year. Cost of pilot program 100 000 per year/per site project would have saved money if it prevented as few as four infections a year. Youth Ethical implications if under legal age, pragmatic for those over legal age. 3 areas that distinguish harm reduction policy as applied to you: Autonomy and ability to make informed choices (developmental processes) Specific harms and risks associated with youth (ie. laws re: access to alcohol) Unique opportunities for drug policies and programs targeting Youth (school based programming) These populations are underserved
Safe injection site? What about safe consumption sites, with regulations, and limits, and drugs that are monitored, measured, and dispensed by professionals.? http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/pub/aids/reports/ontario_needle_exchange_programs_best_practices_report.pdf
As Prime Minister Harper has said, our government is very concerned about the damage and pain drugs cause families and we take this issue very seriously. And that is why our new National Anti-Drug Strategy will place particular emphasis on educating Canadians, especially young people and their parents, about the negative effects – health and otherwise – of illicit drugs. My favorite Tony Clement quote “the party’s over” One size does not fit all Modelled after the failed War on Drugs. Nixon 1971
http://dpnoc.ca/about/a-letter-from-our-president/ “ Similarly, we do not agree with those involved in the Harm Reduction Movement wanting to legalize many of the currently illicit drugs. “ this is a myth or misconception
I have substituted HR for ethics……. Ethics is not a black & white subject Ethics is not something you either know or don’t know Ethics involves thinking and feeling, study and practice, knowledge and intuition
Substitute HR for The Code it of ethics is not a panacea Impossible to provide rules for every circumstance Does not tell you which value takes precedence over the other Provides guidance only- RNs must use critical thinking & problem solving skills to examine the values and how to weigh them in each situation E.g. Values and statements regarding ;promotion of health vs. patient Making informed smoke. Code can be overridden by other, stronger ethical or legal obligations: confidentiality vs. obligation to report child abuse cannot legally assist patient in committing suicide
We each have our own personal values, values about nursing, our institution has its values as well. At times these can collide. This is part of our culture as health care professionals A value is a belief or attitude about a goal, an object, a principle or a behavior. Our personal values affect our beliefs about health and illness and our sense of the “right” thing to do Values are reflected in the choices we make, in our actions and behaviors. But what about the choices of our clients In the process of making an ethical decision, our values can conflict. We may not be aware of it until we encounter conflict or something unexpected - Example: Individual-value life, value of freedom choice and control over one’s life pt with HIV and who becomes pregnant an informed choice to continue using injection drugs…the nursing values of choice and health and well-being come into direct conflict. situations in which one individual nurse’s values conflict with another individual’s personal or profession’s values or the institutions values.
It does not enable drug use. It can help prevent HIV and HCV for those that do not want to quit or can’t quit. It can be a gateway to addiction treatment. There is no evidence showing that that introduction of HR (ie. Needle exchange) increases drug use. This is only an assumption and isn’t looking at why people start to use drugs which is the main consideration that must be made. HR strategies are relatively inexpensive and cost effective (ie. By preventing the transmission of infection diseases or detecting the disease earlier before they have progressed into advanced states) Evidence has shown that HR doesn’t compromise the public’s safety in fact it does the opposite b/c it has been shown that more needles are recovered than are distributed therefore decreasing the public’s risk of contacting HIV or HCV
HR is not a moralistic concept that takes a stand on drug use. It’s a pragmatic solution in that some levels of drug use in society is expected and attempting to ameliorate drug related harms is more feasible in the short term rather than trying to eliminate the drug use all together. (in this case, we’ll focus on the spread of HIV in the Aboriginal population) It makes no assumptions about drug use and those that use drugs.
http://www2.cna-aiic.ca/CNA/documents/pdf/publications/JPS_Harm_Reduction_2012_e.pdf Why are position statements important
Used in Vancouver and Toronto
The primary objectives of these strategies is the reduction of adverse consequences associated with IDU. Needle exchange: provision of clean needles and syringes for IDU. Purpose is to prevent the spread of blood borne diseases and reduce the risk of infection. Injection sites: provide IDUs with a clean and safe environment where sterile equipment is provided and health care and social professionals are available to provide counselling and deal with health issues. Overdose intervention is available. (In Site) Individuals bring in their own drugs. The average amount of daily visits per day was 607. The average visits per person was 11. Methadone: substituting methadone for illegal drugs helps users establish a level of stability free from the use of injectable drugs. Street outreach: drug users often have limited access to health services and street outreach programs allow them to have access to clean syringes, testing, etc. Safe crack pipe programs: helps reduce the transmission of blood borne pathogens. Also gives users a chance to interact with health care professionals to provide education on reducing the risks. Other HR strategies that people don’t consider: seatbelts, bike helmets, low fat food
Historically, methadone maintenance programs underwent a political struggle. Methadone was available in Canada in the 1960’s but was only used for three to six percent of the injection drug using population. In the mid 1990’s government regulations changed increasing treatment availability which resulted in up to 24 percent of the injection drug using population receiving treatment in 1998 (Fisher, Rehm, & Blitz-Miller, 2000). Fisher et al., (2000) stated that. “…there were clear, instructive lessons… yet Canada’s policy-makers failed for the longest time to implement appropriate and sufficient measures to prevent and minimize injection drug use related harms” (p. 1712).
Focus on IDU because this is the method that causes the most HIV cases in Aboriginal pop’n however there are other methods. In total pop’n of Canadians, the method is MSM. (2007) Of all AIDS cases in FN 45% is attributed to IDU. Need to take a HOLISTIC approach and consider the social determinants of health. Illicit drug use among FN is double the rate of the general Canadian pop’n. https://mymail.siast.sk.ca/owa/attachment.ashx?attach=1&id=RgAAAACgBUjceA6RSIRe%2bXueIDitBwAs61ZeCi5PQrAmj7cmGBezADcScG0qAAAs61ZeCi5PQrAmj7cmGBezAEu946WTAAAJ&attid0=EACnk8wYziYtSp0OF5N6FADw&attcnt=1
In no particular order. All these result in physical, emotional, mental and spiritual pain. Aboriginals have social disadvantages and these put them more at risk to use illicit drugs. Poverty, low education, unstable family structure, physical abuse and poor social support network. (64% say they were raised in violent homes) They also suffer from culture barriers to health care services (language, lack of culturally appropriate services). Overall infection rate of HIV/AIDS is 2.8 times higher in FN than non-FN. (2007 stat) Alcohol abuse was a factor in 70% of homes. 126 Aboriginal IDUs themselves, say they may have ended up on the streets and turned to IDU b/c of the legacy of abuse they have gone through (Joining the Circle) Joining the Circle (from Abor. IDUs) : Alcohol 70% Violence 64% Suicide 50% Incest 44% Sexual abuse or assault in men 50% + Low education level 17% (<gr.9)
The most important element of developing and providing harm reduction services to FN people is incorporating traditional Aboriginal practices. Culturally appropriate services include: Aboriginal culture itself (medicine wheel), language, history and increased awareness of FN people among service providers. Harm reduction services need to be culturally appropriate in order for them to be accessed. IN a study, FN people identified they would like to see additional services provided (education along with needle exchange) in conjunction with HR services. Elders and community leader’s support is crucial. These people are respected by the community and hold the power to help. Similarities include: importance of links between the community and the individual. CAAN’s model (presented later) Healing journey is more in depth than in Western practices. Healing process includes: information, prevention activities, crisis interventions, counselling and follow-up. Difference includes the incorporation of community practices, customs, beliefs, ceremonies and use of Elders and Traditional medicine people. Using these culturally appropriate services is a key element in increasing pride and self-esteem.
Mood altering substances are incompatible for some Aboriginal peoples’ traditions, customs and cultural ways. (seen as out of balance) HR does not focus on abstinence, rather is looks at decreasing the risks, not specifically discontinuation. This has been seen as a barrier to offering Aboriginal people harm reduction services. For some Aboriginal communities, there is a stigma attached that HR in that it is seen as an indication of failure. This reason also makes FN peoples hesitant to access health care. There is a fear of discrimination and judgement among everyone, but this fear is even higher among Aboriginals. There is an absence of funded HR services in Aboriginal communities (specifically reserves and rural) which forces people to travel long distances and make other arrangements.
B/c of the settings nurses work in. They are in a unique pos’n to prevent many of the harms associated with drug use. Using HR strategies in nursing practice creates future opportunities to promote the health and well being of those experiencing substance use. Underlying principles of HR reflect the CNA’s code of ethics (2002)
Must look at the issue through a population health approach gov’ts at all levels can facilitate and create conditions within the social and physical environment that support and enhance health (Health Canada, 2001). The lack of these determinants of health may precede or exacerbate drug misuse. Strategy should include measures that address the underlying factors associated with drug misuse and measures to address the more immediate risk factors. Drug misuse: using drugs improperly Abuse: excessive use
Principles of Harm Reduction pragmatism human rights focus on harms maximize intervention options priority of immediate goals drug user involvement Why consider harm reduction programming? Many social, economic, mental health and personal reasons why people engage in higher risk behaviour Not all people are able to make the immediate changes necessary to eliminate risk
We now know the definition of harm reduction and its goals. There are several HR strategies that can be implemented to decrease adverse consequences of IDU. The risk factors are different from people in the Western culture