Medical Conferences, Pharma Conferences, Engineering Conferences, Science Conferences, Manufacturing Conferences, Social Science Conferences, Business Conferences, Scientific Conferences Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai, Turkey 2014 2015 2016
Global Research & Development Services (GRDS) is a leading academic event organizer, publishing Open Access Journals and conducting several professionally organized international conferences all over the globe annually. GRDS aims to disseminate knowledge and innovation with the help of its International Conferences and open access publications. GRDS International conferences are world-class events which provide a meaningful platform for researchers, students, academicians, institutions, entrepreneurs, industries and practitioners to create, share and disseminate knowledge and innovation and to develop long-lasting network and collaboration.
GRDS is a blend of Open Access Publications and world-wide International Conferences and Academic events. The prime mission of GRDS is to make continuous efforts in transforming the lives of people around the world through education, application of research and innovative ideas.
Global Research & Development Services (GRDS) is also active in the field of Research Funding, Research Consultancy, Training and Workshops along with International Conferences and Open Access Publications.
International Conferences 2014 – 2015
Malaysia Conferences, Thailand Conferences, Singapore Conferences, Hong Kong Conferences, Dubai Conferences, Turkey Conferences, Conference Listing, Conference Alerts
RAK Call Girls Service # 971559085003 # Call Girl Service In RAK
Grds international conference on social science (2)
1. Adolescents’ SNSs Usage and
Face-to-face Interaction with
Siblings
Nurul Atielia Binti Mohd Shafian
Universiti Sains Malaysia
2. Introduction
• Social networking sites SNSs are online services that allow users to;
• Create profiles
• Form a network of friends
• Interact via public and private means
• Posting user-generated content
• Adolescents are among the most prolific users of SNSs
• 93% of adolescents, ages 12 to 17 years old go online in 2010
• 55% have their own SNS profile
• They sped a considerable portion of their daily life on SNSs
3. Problem Statement
• Adolescents spend most of their time surfing internet when they are not in school.
The major problem is adolescents merely spending almost of their time surfing
internet without specific purpose.They keep on chatting in social network sites,
playing video games and etc. Most of them spend their times to surf on the
internet rather than do revision and homework. Sometimes, they neglect the
presence of their parents and other family members. As so many adolescents
spend too much time on the Internet especially on SNSs, it is crucial to be aware of
its impact on their relationship with family members.
4. • According to Family SystemsTheory, there is a relation between family members
and dependence on one another . Besides, family is a very complex system where
every portion of this system are connected, dependent and related with each
other, in which if any changes occur in one of it, the whole system will be affected .
Because of family interdependence, if something were to happen in the family –
whether it is good or bad, such as marriage, death, losing a job or winning a
competition, it will affect all the other family members.
• With regard to this theory, whatever decision or behavior made by adolescents
will affect the way his/her family members interact with each other. For instance, if
he/she were to decide to spend more time online as he/she will get more fun and
be closer to friends online, and at the same time will neglect his/her family
members, eventually the whole family interaction will deteriorate.
5. Participants
• This study targeted to recruited 400 participants comprising students aged
13 and 16 years old.These two groups of ages were chosen to compare the
difference of early and late adolescence SNSs usage.The participants came
from urban Kuala Lumpur and two rural Selangor districts.These areas were
chosen because they had among the highest internet usage and broadband
penetration in Malaysia.
6. Measures
• Family Interaction
Frequencies of face-to-face interaction with siblings were assessed using a adapted
version of RevisedTaxonomy of Interpersonal Speech Events (Goldsmith & Baxter,
1996).
• SNSs Usage
Eleven multiple choice questions on SNSs usage were asked such as frequency and
amount of SNSs usage and type of SNS joined.These questions were adapted from
Social Networking Use Questionnaire (Swang, 2011).
7. Results
Variables n %
Has at least one SNSs account
Yes
No
365
20
94.8
5.2
Frequency of login on SNSs on school days
1-2 times 197 51.2
3-4 times 95 24.7
5-6 times 29 7.5
More than 7 times 50 13.0
Frequency of login on SNSs on non-school days
1-2 times 77 20.0
3-4 times 116 30.1
5-6 times 62 16.1
More than 7 times 117 30.4
TABLE Ι. DESCRIPTIVE OF SNSS USAGE
8. Variables n %
Time spent on SNSs on school days
Less than 1 hour 136 35.3
1-2 hours 136 35.3
3-4 hours 61 15.8
5-6 hours 15 3.9
More than 6 hours 23 6.0
Time spent on SNSs on non-school days
Less than 1 hour 67 17.4
1-2 hours 137 35.6
3-4 hours 87 22.6
5-6 hours 40 10.4
More than 6 hours 41 10.6
9. - Age moderates the relationship between time spent on SNSs on school days and face-to-face interaction with
siblings and
- - Age moderates the relationship between time spent on SNSs on non-school days and face-to-face interaction with
siblings.
TABLE ΙI.TIME SPENT ON SNSS AND AGE AS PREDICTORS OF FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION WITH SIBLINGS
Block Variables R2 β p
1 TSSD .010 .099 .071
Age -.006 .915
2 TSSD X age .028 .496 .012
1 TSND .009 .097 .075
Age .004 .942
2 TSND X age .040 .624 .001
10. Fig. 1. Graphical depiction of age moderating the TSSD to face-to-face interaction with
siblings relationship. Notes: Low, med and high levels on the X-axis were automatically
generated by ModGraph.
11. Fig. 2. Graphical depiction of age moderating the TSND to face-to-face interaction with
siblings relationship. Notes: Low, med and high levels on the X-axis were automatically
generated by ModGraph
12. Block Variables R2 β p
1 FLSD .005 .066 .223
Age .011 .840
2 FLSD X age .010 .259 .165
1 FLND .008 .088 .105
Age .001 .985
2 FLND X age .032 .591 .004
-Age moderates the relationship between frequency of login on SNSs on school days and face-to-face interaction with siblings
-Age moderates the relationship between frequency of login on SNSs on non-school days and face-to-face interaction with
siblings.
TABLE V. FREQUENCY OF LOGIN ON SNSS AND AGE AS PREDICTORS OF FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION WITH
SIBLINGS
13. Fig. 3. Graphical depiction of age moderating the FLND to face-to-face
interaction with siblings relationship. Notes: Low, med and high levels on the X-
axis were automatically generated by ModGraph.
14. Discussion
• Age moderates the relationships between times spent on SNSs on non-school day, time spent
on SNSs on non-school day and frequency of login on SNSs on non-school day with face-to-face
interaction with siblings.This finding indicated that younger adolescents’ face-to-face
interaction with siblings decreased the more time they spent and the more frequent they logged
in on SNSs.Young adolescents is still less mature, more independent and ego centric.They
might argue and fight for limited resource such as computer with other siblings.
• Family SystemsTheory refers that one event that happen in a family will affect the whole
persons in the family. In typical family relationships, interaction among subsystems (parent-child
and siblings relationships) have been shown to impact the quality of relationships.This is also
applied on how one behaves, the whole family will be affected and react with his/her action.
According to the findings, adolescents’ face-to-face interaction with siblings decreased the more
time and the more frequent they spent on SNSs moderated by age.
15. Conclusion
• Adolescents logged in on SNSs frequently and spent a significant amount of
time on them every day.The findings showed that associations existed
between adolescents’ SNSs usage with their face-to-face interaction with
siblings. Thus, parents may take some proactive and creative measures to
avoid excessive usage of SNSs among their child that may lead to decline in
face-to-face interaction among them in order to promote a good interaction
within family.