2. Dryland Systems of the World
Drylands
•Physical water scarcity
•Rapid natural resource degradation
and desertification
•Groundwater depletion
•Drought
•Climate change will make them drier
Premise
Successful dryland production systems
evolve through an integrated approach
that includes the right mix of:
• Innovative partnerships
•Diverse technologies, and
•Appropriate policies.
3. Oveview: Partnership in Dryland Systems
• Part of conceptual framework
and one of four Strategic
Research Themes
• Partners set research
priorities and identified
“Action Sites”
• A simple example of how
partnership in a systems
approach can achieve impact
even under very marginal
dryland conditions
• Partnership in governance
4. Conceptual Framework
• Framework Development
Workshop January 2012
• Designed with participants
from CG centers (ICRISAT,
ILRI, Bioversity, IWMI, CIP,
ICRAF)) and FARA/SSA-CP
• SRT1: Approaches and
models for strengthening
innovation systems,
building stakeholder
innovation capacity, and
linking knowledge to
policy action
5. Partner Involvement in Inception Phase
Site selection and characterization
• Consultative selection of
Action Sites—ministries,
NARES, etc.
• Groundwork in 5 regions
to characterize Target
Areas (SRT2, risk
management, and SRT3,
sustainable
intensification)--NARES
• Regional Inception
Workshops to prioritize
research—multiple
stakeholders
6. Characterization of Target Areas
Criteria Limits for SRT 2 Limits for SRT 3
Length of growing period <90 days 90-180 days
Distribution of poverty
Hunger and malnutrition (food security,
no of people, % of people)
Aridity Index 0.03 to 0.35 0.35-0.65
Environmental risk (Rainfall variability, CV>15% CV<15%
access to irrigation,
Land degradation(soil salinity, soil High Low-medium
erosion)
Market access Travel time >2 Travel time <2
hrs hrs
Population density
7. Criteria for selection of Action Sites
Characteristics of potential Action Sites in Target Areas
Target Area Potential Potential Potential
Action Site 1 Satellite Site 1 Satellite Site 2
Country
Geographical
location
Accessibility
Potential for
hypothesis testing
Representativeness
Potential for out-
scaling (impact)
Potential to attract
funds
Potential to interact
with CRPs
8. West Africa & Dry Savannas
SRT2: the KKM (Kano-Katsina-Maradi) action transect
SRT3: the WBS (Wa-Bobo-Sikasso) action transect
Regional:
INSAH/CILSS
Burkina Faso:
INERA
Ghana: ARI,
CSIR
Mali: IER
Niger: INRAN
Nigeria: ARC
10. Central Asia and Caucasus
SRT2: Aral Sea Basin and Rasht Valley
SRT3: Fergana Valley
Central Asia and Caucasus:
Kazakhstan: South-
Western Scientific
Production Center of
Agriculture
Tajikistan: TAAS
Turkmenistan: National
Farmers’ Association, NAS
Uzbekistan: Kashkadarya
Research Institute
11. North Africa and West Asia
• SRT2: Jordan/Syria;
• SRT2: Satellite: Béni Khedache-Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia
• SRT3: Mekness region of Morocco; Egypt Nile delta
• SRT3 Satellites: Karkheh River Basin, Iran
Egypt: ARC
Jordan: NCARE
Morocco: INRA
Syria: GCSAR,
Agha Khan
Foundation
Tunisia: IRA
12. East & Southern Africa
SRT2: Northeastern Kenya and Southeastern Ethiopia
SRT3: Chinyanja Triangle (central and southern Malawi, eastern
province of Zambia, and the Tete Province of Mozambique
East and Southern Africa:
Ethiopia: EIAR
Kenya: KARI
South Africa: CSIR, Univ. of
Ft Hare, WRC
Sudan: ARC
Zambia: University of
Zambia
13. Partner Involvement in Inception Phase
Research Prioritization
• 16 Common Hypotheses • 20 Common Outputs
15. Partnerships in Systems Research
Biological control of the pearl millet head miner
• Became serious pest during 1970s in
marginal dryland systems of Sahel
• Sahel has some of the world’s poorest
countries with weak institutions and
resource-poor farmers
• Over 25 years, multiple funding partners
(CILSS, FAO, USAID, McKnight Foundation
and BM Gates Foundation)
• Over 25 years, multiple research partners
(CIRAD, Texas A&M, ICRISAT, IITA, ISRA,
IER, INERA) on pest ecology via several
uncoordinated short-term projects
• Group of prominent national scientists
funded by McKnight Foundation
developed and deployed a systems-based
IPM program
• Trained farmers to raise and release
parasitic wasp to kill the head miner.
16. Better Model for Systems Research and
Development
• Emphasis on partnership (McKnight
Foundation)
• National research partners take the
lead and gain recognition, leading to
uptake and institutional
strengthening
• Farmers, technicians, students,
animateurs, etc. have integrated
roles, facilitating adoption
• CG centers, “Advanced Research
Institutes,” etc. play a supporting
partner role
• Prominent role for women as
scientists, farmers, and beneficiaries
17. Outputs, Impact, and Outcome
Output: On-farm methodology for mass rearing
and release of parasitoid wasp
Impact (after 3 years): Release in 385 villages,
with an effective coverage approaching more
than 200,000 ha. Estimates suggest yield
increases of ~40% in the areas of intervention,
and that ~72% of larvae akilled.
Outcome: National researchers, adequately
supported and empowered, deliver real and
effective solutions that are:
•Scientifically sound
•Meet the needs of the smallholder farmers, and
•Contribute significantly to improved food
security, community resilience, and reduced
poverty.
18. Outscaling
1. Spillover effects
a) Neighboring villages informally seek to learn from
animateurs
b) Widespread recognition from farmer organizations and
local, regional, and national governments (upscaling
effects)
2. Good prospects for regional expansion to wherever pearl
millet head miner is a production constraint (e.g. from
Senegal to Sudan).
3. Because capacity was built at many community levels , the
technology can spread based on community involvement
without the need for large external financial support.
Site Selection When using the criteria laid down across the CRP, namely aridity, length of the growing period, rainfall variability, access to irrigation, land degradation and market access, it became apparent that Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh in India all have large SRT2 and SRT3 areas, while Rajasthan in India and Pakistan and Afghanistan are mainly SRT2. Based on a higher poverty index, pockets of Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh are still important for SRT2, and much of Maharashtra and Karnataka for SRT3. Parts of Pakistan in the region of Chakwal have pockets of high poverty for both SRT2 and SRT3.
Aral Sea and Rasht and Kyzyl-Suu valleys for SRT 2 areas in the CA&C region. The Fergana Valley readily characterizes the SRT 3 areas in the Central Asia & Caucasus region. Climate Precipitation Precipitation varies between the flat alluvial plain areas of the Fergana Valley which receive 150 to 250mm of precipitation per year and the mountains and foothills which receive between 300 and 600mm per year. There are two rainy seasons per year in the spring and autumn. Number of days with precipitations (of 0.1 mm or more): Winter 19-23 Spring 17-19 Summer 5-8 Autumn 10-12 The coefficient of variation (CV) of annual precipitation in the region (n = 50) is 24-35%. Temperature Average annual temperatures range from 7-11°C in the foothills of the eastern part of the valley) and up to 14-15°C in the plains. Average maximum temperatures in July are from 34-35 ° C in the plains and up to 25-30°C in the foothills. The absolute maximum is 43.9°C. Average minimum temperatures in January are from -3° C - 2° C in the flat part and -9° C to -4°C in the foothills. The absolute minimum is – 28.7°C in the plains. Soils In the system of latitude soil-climatic zones, the flat part of the Fergana Valley is a desert area with gray-brown, sandy desert and takyr soils. According to the scheme of the provincial division, the Fergana Valley is included in the Central Asian soil and climatic province, which is characterized by continental climate (dry) and specific subtropical soils differ from soils of the more northern regions of Eurasia. In the irrigated lands in the Valley there are mainly medium loamy soils (43.8%), clay and loamy soils (21.0%), loamy (24.8%), sandy loamy and sandy soils (10.3%), stony gravel and crushed stone on the surface of the soil (0.1%). Land use and cover The main crops in the Fergana Valley are cotton, wheat, vegetables, melons, orchards and vineyards, perennial plants, and other crops. The leading crop is cotton. The area under cotton covers 35-40% of the total area in the Andijan region. Land degradation In Fergana valley salt affected soil is observed as 11.4% of total irrigated area. Great damage to the national economy of the republic is caused by mudslides. Protection of land from wind and water erosions is one of the most pressing issues for further development of agricultural production, protection and improvement of land use. Water resources The main sources of water in the Fergana Valley are: • The River Karadarya - mixed filling • The Naryn river - mixed filling • The Maylisay and Tentaksay - snow filling • The Syrdarya River According to the annual report of Narin-Kara-Dayra and Sokh-Syrdara River Basin Authority 95 to 96% of water, on low water years, is used for irrigation. In the Fergana Valley, the quality of irrigation water meets water quality requirements for irrigation. Salinity of water in the rivers and small streams is low. In the flood period in April and May), the silt content in rivers and small streams increases to a noticeable level especially in the foothill areas. Downstream silt content increases due to wastewater and channel deformations. At the south part of the Andijan region (Booz, Ulugnar, Balykchy), collected drainage water is used for irrigation as its salinity is low and it meets the requirements for irrigation. Farming systems In the mountains of Fergana Valley, the following crops are grown: natural feeds, almonds, walnuts and wild rose. In the foothills wheat, barley, alfalfa, sainfoin, horticultures, large fruits and potato are grown. On the plains wheat, cotton, tobacco, maize, potato, onion, carrot, beans, vegetables, melons, fruit and berry crops, alfalfa and greenhouse crops are grown. Livestock is an important part of the Fergana Valley’s agriculture, contributing to the insuring of the population with food and industries by the raw materials. Depending on the natural-climatic conditions of the region, livestock can be divided into intensive (industrial), extensive (grazing), and domestic. Dairy cattle breeding, poultry farming is concentrated in the suburban area of irrigation. Pasture livestock is concentrated in the area with the lowest natural resource potential on private lands. Depending on the natural-climatic conditions of the region it can be divided into intensive (industrial), extensive (grazing), and domestic livestock. Dairy cattle breeding and poultry farming is concentrated in the suburban irrigated area. Institutional Support and Policies The Institute "Uzdaverloyiha" together with the research and project organizations of the republic developed a "scheme of erosion control measures in the Republic of Uzbekistan", which defines the series of measures on erosion control, and their scale and sequence of operations.
The two benchmark areas include south Jordan, Syria, south Turkey, and west and north Iraq for SRT2, and the high rainfall areas (>500 mm) of the northern parts of the Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia for SRT3.
Strongest academic role for Mme Dabire, who also has national and international status