The communal pasture system in Usangu Plains, Tanzania is threatened by several factors. Intense grazing pressure has led to bush encroachment degrading the pastures. Livestock diseases have increased due to overgrazing. Immigrant farmers have converted pasture lands to rice fields, further reducing available grazing areas. The remaining rangeland is now open access and overgrazed by multiple ethnic pastoralist groups, disrupting traditional practices. The government has proposed establishing managed communal lands and encouraging pastoralist organizations, but privatization risks negatively impacting poorer community members' access to resources.
Falcon's Invoice Discounting: Your Path to Prosperity
Threats to the communal pasture system in usangu roll 29 31
1. THREATS TO THE COMMUNAL PASTURE
SYSTEM IN USANGU PLAINS, TANZANIA
2. GROUP MEMBERS
NAMES ROLL NO.
AKSHAYA ANANT 28
GAUTAM KUMAR 29
VIVEK KUMAR 31
3. CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
PROBLEMS
GOVT. PROPOSAL
FRAMEWORK OF USANGU TANZANIA
RESULTS
RULES AND REGULATION
CONCLUSION
5. INTRODUCTION
Tanzania’s vast grasslands, numerous water courses and dry season
swamps made the planes favourable for livestock herding.
Tanzania and elsewhere negative perceptions pervade pastoral policy
and management, especially in regard to livestock mobility and the
migration of pastoralists to new territories outside.
Pastoralists suffer from the effects of settlement, encroachment on
their traditional pastures
Lack of understanding of pastoralism by policy makers
Twin encroachment by state and private interests
6. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
To understand the situation of common property resource in Usangu
Tanzania
To understand the degrading pastural land in Usangu Tanzania
To protect land resources from degradation for sustainable
development.
7. PROBLEMS
Intense grazing pressure on the remaining grasslands is causing
severe bush encroachment, rendering them less productive for
grazing.
Livestock diseases has become rampant in the region and mortality
rates are high.
This made migration easier and hard to exclude outsiders.
National identity of Tanzanians, as opposed to individual ethnic
identities, was emphasized.
8. GOVT. PROPOSAL
Establishing “range development areas”, where each area would
have a corresponding range development commission for controlling
settlement and natural resource use. Range development areas would
be managed as communal property, and corporate groups of herders
would be allowed to form ranching organization there
It will encourage pastoral communities to form savings and credit
institutions such as savings and credit societies, trust funds and rural
banks. In addition, financial institutions will be encouraged to work
with pastoral communities to develop an appropriate credit system.
while the Government encourages livestock owners in overgrazed
areas to move to lower stocked areas
9. Framework
Availability of
Promote efficient Govt. & Sangu
Grazing Ground
utilization of Chief
rangelands &
Empower
pastoralist
institutions Tradition
Grazing and
agriculture
Sangu People
Denial of non-
sangu people
Degraded
Pasture
land
10. Results
Extensive areas of pasture were used for small scale irrigated rice
production by immigrants.
Currently 25 different ethnic farmer groups reside there claiming the
lands they have developed for agriculture
Remaining rangeland became open access
Remaining rangeland is shared by 6 ethnic group of livestock
herders
They follow their own cultural practices disrupting practices of
another group
Presently there is no regional resource management framework
11. Rules and laws
Certificates of village land will be issued to protect common
property regimes.
The Government will recognise and respect the rights of pastoral
communities to their traditional grazing lands and will promote
communal initiatives for better management and integrated
exploitation of rangeland resources.
Security of tenure for pastoralists in pastoral land areas will be
guaranteed by appropriate measures including gazetting to protect
grazing lands from encroachment.
12. CONCLUSION
Demarcation and titling of land and elimination of mobility is the
most popular approach being proposed by the government in almost
all policies and strategies.
privatisation of land which is likely to have very negative
consequences for the poorer members of the community because
they will be denied access to the resources which are currently
accessible to all.
Need of common property rights and Mutual understanding among
the sangu people