Transaction Management in Database Management System
Digital Learning Through Online Research Guides
1. Innovations in Online Learning 2012, San Antonio, Texas
Jody Bailey, Reference and Instruction Librarian
Rafia Mirza, Reference and Instruction Librarian
Gretchen Trkay, Information Literacy Librarian
University of Texas at Arlington
Digital Learning: Teaching Information
Literacy through Online Research Guides
2. Overview
History of research guides.
Literature review.
UT Arlington usability studies.
Problem: Students need research help,
especially distance-ed students.
Solution: Add information literacy (instructional)
content to online research guides so that they
will be more useful.
2
3. Synonyms
Bibliographies (annotated,
subject, biographical, topical, etc.)
Reading lists
Readers’ aids
Pathfinders
Information portals
Webliographies
Resource lists
Study guides
Subject guides
Topic guides
Research guides
3
4. Detail from Annotated Syllabus for the Systematic Study
of Librarianship, page 4.
Note that this 1904 study guide comprised only 27 pages.
4
5. Transition to Digital Form
Example of a research guide on Literature
Started in 1990s from 1997.
Basic transfer: print
digital
Little/no thought
given to hypertext
environment
Guides remain
fairly linear with
long lists of links http://web.archive.org/web/19971024115756/http://www.lib.lsu.edu/hum/lit.html
(Vileno, 2007)
5
6. Assessment of Online Research Guides: Literature Review
Themes
Most students do not use
research guides.
Paucity of user-centered
data.
“One size does not fit
all.”
“Students do not relate
well to subject guides”
and find them “difficult
to use.”
(Adebonojo, 2010; Ouellette, 2011, pp. 442, 436; Reeb & Gibbons,
2004, pp. 123-124; Staley, 2007, pp. 119, 126; Vileno, 2007, p. 436;
Vileno, 2010, p. 1).
6
7. Assessment of Online Research Guides: Literature Review
Students want . . .
A “simple and clean layout”
“Search feature”
“Succinct annotations to resources”
“Limited page scrolling”
“Embedded instruction”
“Librarian contact info”
Clear navigation
Faculty recommendations of guides and librarian
recommendations of resources
Content customized to their needs
(Hintz et al., 2010, pp. 40, 45-46; Ouellette, 2011, p. 443-444, 448; Stitz, Laster, Bove, & Wise, 2011, p. 191; Vileno, 2010, p. 19).
7
8. Assessment of Online Research Guides: Literature Review
Students don’t want . . .
Jargon and unclear,
confusing labels
Cluttered, crowded sites
Web 2.0 functionality:
user-generated “rating
systems, discussion
forums, student
recommendations, and
. . . personalization
features”
(Hintz et al., 2010, pp. 45-46; Ouellette, 2011, p. 444; Reeb &
Gibbons, 2004, p. 127; Stitz et al., 2011, p. 191; Vileno, 2010, p.
19)
8
9. UT Arlington’s Research Guide Platform: LibGuides
Produced by
Springshare
Content
management
system
Widely used by
academic libraries
Easy to learn
Superb tech support
9
10. LibGuides: Functionality
WYSIWYG and point-and-click editing.
No experience with HTML needed.
Content types: links to resources (e.g., books, databases, podcasts),
embedded video and images, RSS feeds, polls, various search boxes.
APIs and widgets.
10
11. UT Arlington Usability Study: Methodology
Our interpretation of University of
Washington’s recommendations
for LibGuide design
Our baseline design
11
14. UT Arlington Usability Study: Methodology
Tasks: Each User Completed One Task
Task 1
You are writing a paper on high-stakes testing in education. Where can you find a resource to give
you a brief overview of this topic?
Task 2
You are writing a 10-page research paper for English about depictions of women in Shakespeare's
Hamlet. You must find reliable, scholarly sources that will help you better understand this topic. You
are uncertain what makes a source reliable and/or scholarly. Use the LibGuide to find out the
characteristics of reliable and scholarly sources.
Task 3
You need to write about an issue related to a home based nursing. Locate one peer-reviewed article.
Task 4
Using the Subject Guide for electrical engineering, find a paper on the topic of wireless sensors in
biological research.
Task 5
Locate this article: Burke, E. (2009). Islam at the center: Technological complexes and the roots of
modernity. Journal of World History, 20(2), 165-186.
14
16. UT Arlington Usability Study: Methodology
http://www.flickr.com/photos/samdogs/3253791356/
16
17. Round 1 Findings: Contextualized Content
Students want guides contextualized to their
assignments
“Where is the tab for my
assignment?”
“Why are there so many
tabs?”
17
18. Round 1 Findings: Jargon
Students found some of our language to
be confusing.
“What are reference resources?”
“What is interlibrary loan?”
18
19. Round 1 Findings: Landing Page Confusion
Students found the
home page insufficient
and the amount of
content overwhelming
Students partially
scanned text instead of
reading and searched
using only the keywords
provided in an
assignment prompt.
19
20. Round 1 Findings: Search Box Confusion
Students equate ALL search boxes with Google-like search.
20
21. Basic Principles of Web Design
Define a target audience.
Articulate the site’s purpose.
Use targeted navigation.
Choose readable font size and colors.
Include white space.
Avoid walls of text.
21
22. Students’ Information Seeking Behavior
Carol Kuhlthau’s
Information Search
Process
Project Information
Literacy’s (PIL) Model of
the Undergraduate
Research Process
22
28. Testing the Redesign
9 Participants.
Infrequent users of subject guides.
Each completed 5 tasks.
Answered 8 open-ended survey questions.
One committee member facilitated in person
while another member remotely observed and
coded.
28
29. Task 1 — Gather Background Information
Average task score – 0.40 points Average task score – 2.33 points
Average time on task – 6.54 minutes Average time on task – 4.26 minutes
29
30. Comparative Results: Task 1 Errors
Statistically significant decrease in errors made
using the redesigned guide
Inappropriate use of search box
Inappropriate use of resource
Deviation from expected path
Total errors
30
31. Task 2 — What is a Scholarly Source?
Average task score – 1.20 points Average task score – 0.22 points
Average time on task – 11.51 minutes Average time on task – 2.86 minutes
31
32. Comparative Results: Task 2 Errors
Statistically significant decrease in errors made
using the redesigned guide
Inappropriate use of resource
Language confusion
Deviation from expected path
Total errors
32
33. Task 3 — Find a Peer-Reviewed Article
Average task score – 1.60 points Average task score – 1.63 points
Average time on task – 5.54 minutes Average time on task – 4 minutes
33
34. Task 4 — Find a Primary Source
Average task score – 1.78 points
Average time on task – 3.22 minutes
No round-1 comparison
34
35. Task 5 — Find an Article from a Citation
Average task score – 2.0 points Average task score – 2.5 points
Average time on task – 6.33 minutes Average time on task – 2.34 minutes
35
36. Comparative Results: Task 5 Errors
Statistically significant decrease in errors made
using the redesigned guide
Inappropriate use of search box
Inappropriate use of resource
Deviation from expected path
Total errors
36
37. Next Steps
Refining instructional content.
Creating content that can be used throughout
all the guides.
Adapting content to individual subject guides.
37
38. References
Adebonojo, L. G. (2010). LibGuides: Customizing subject guides for individual courses. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 17,
398-412. doi: 10.1080/10691316.2010.525426
Brown, J. D. (1904). Annotated Syllabus for the Systematic Study of Librarianship. London, United Kingdom: Library Supply Co.
Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=aspvMHvmOSoC&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false
Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2009, December 1). Lessons learned: How college students seek information in the digital age.
Project Information Literacy. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_finalv_YR1_12_2009v2.pdf
Herzog, A., Huddleston, B., & Trkay, G. (2012, February 23). Digital learning: Teaching information literacy through LibGuides.
Poster session presented at Educause West/Southwest Regional Conference, Portland, OR.
Hintz, K., et al. (2010). Letting students take the lead: A user-centred approach to evaluating subject guides. Evidence Based
Library And Information Practice, 5(4), 39-52. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2012, January). Information search process. Retrieved from
http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~kuhlthau/information_search_process.htm
Literature. (1997). LSU Libraries webliography. Retrieved from
http://web.archive.org/web/19971024115756/http://www.lib.lsu.edu/hum/lit.html
Ouellelte, D. (2011). Subject guides in academic libraries: A user-centred study of uses and perceptions. Canadian Journal Of
Information & Library Sciences, 35, 436-451. Retrieved from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/journal/journal.htm
Pathfinder (Library Science). (2012). Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathfinder_(Library_Science)
Reeb, B., & Gibbons, S. (2004). Students, librarians, and subject guides: Improving a poor rate of return. Portal: Libraries & The
Academy, 4(1), 123-130. Retrieved from http://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/
Reitz, J. M. (2012). Pathfinder. ODLIS: Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science. Retrieved from http://www.abc-
clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_p.aspx#pathfinder
Reitz, J. M. (2012). Research guide. ODLIS: Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science. Retrieved from http://www.abc-
clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_R.aspx?#researchguide
Staley, S. M. (2007). Academic subject guides: A case study of use at San Jose State University. College & Research Libraries, 68,
119-139. Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/68/2/119.full.pdf+html
Stitz, T., Laster, S., Bove, F. J., & Wise, C. (2011). A path to providing user-centered subject guides. Internet Reference Services
Quarterly, 16(4), 183-198. doi: 10.1080/10875301.2011.621819
Vileno, L. (2007). From paper to electronic, the evolution of pathfinders: A review of the literature. Reference Services Review, 35,
434-451. doi: 10.1108/00907320710774300
Vileno, L. (2010). Testing the usability of two online research guides. Partnership: The Canadian Journal Of Library And Information
Practice And Research, 5(2), 1-21. Retrieved from http://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/
38
39. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this
license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a
letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View,
California, 94041, USA.
39