Russian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Before-After Crash Analysis:Evaluation of Red Light Cameras in Opelika
1. Before-After Crash Analysis:
Evaluation of Red Light
Cameras in Opelika
Fatemeh Baratian Ghorghi
PhD Student at:
Auburn University, Department of Civil Engineering
November 14, 2014
2. INTRODUCTION
• Background (what was RLR?)
• RLC in Opelika
• Literature Review
• Objectives
• Data Collection
• Data Analysis
• Conclusion
3. What Was RLR?
• RLR crash, the most common/most severe type of crash
• More than 165,000 injuries in 2008
• RLC supplement Law enforcement efforts
• National Survey
• Opponents: a tool to gather revenue
• No study evaluates the effectiveness of RLCs in AL
• Safety benefits
4. RLC in Opelika
• April 1, 2013
• The overall safety effect is not clear.
5. Past findings of safety effects
• Reduced right-angle crashes (injury and fatal) 19% - 32%
• Increased rear-end crashes (PDO) up to 40%
6. DATA COLLECTION
• CARE
• Crashes due to RLR violation
• Rear-end crashes (RLC)
• Not clearly defined in crash reports : 2 filters
8. DATA COLLECTION
• Before: April 2010 –April 2013
• After: April 2013 –April 2014
• What about newly updated data?
• April 2014- July 2014
9. DATA COLLECTION
• To calculate the average annual crash rate: If you use the available crash
data from April 2013 to July 2013, you are overestimating the crash
numbers.
10. DATA COLLECTION
• Factors:
• Severity
• Manner of crash
• Number of injured
• Number of killed
• Road names
• Node numbers
• Lat/Long
Crash Location
14. DATA ANALYSIS
• RLR Crashes
• Before: April 2010 –April2013 (Averages are used)
• Before Crash
Intersection
(BEFORE)
April 2010 –
April2013
Severity
Number
Injured
Number
Killed
Number
crashPDO
Possible
Injury
Non-
Incapacitatin
g Injury
Incapacitating
Injury
Pepperell
Parkway&
Gateway Drive
1.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.3 0.0 2.7
Interstate Dr &
Gateway Drive
1.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 2.0
Fredrick Rd &
Gateway Drive
0.7 0.3 0.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.7
Fox Run Pkwy& W
Point Ave
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 4.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 5.0 0.0 6.3
15. DATA ANALYSIS
• RLR Crashes
• After: April 2013- April 2014
• Before Crash
Intersection
(AFTER)
April 2013 – April
2014
Severity
Number
Injured
Number
Killed
Number
crashPDO
Possible
Injury
Non-
Incapacitatin
g Injury
Incapacitating
Injury
Pepperell
Parkway&
Gateway Drive
1 0 0 1 1 0 2
Interstate Dr &
Gateway Drive
2 3 1 0 6 0 6
Fredrick Rd &
Gateway Drive
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fox Run Pkwy& W
Point Ave
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 3 3 1 1 7 0 8
16. Percentage of Change
• RLR Crashes
• Before Crash
Intersection
Severity
Number
Injured
Number
Killed
Number
crashPDO
Possible
Injury
Non-
Incapacitatin
g Injury
Incapacitating
Injury
Pepperell
Parkway&
Gateway Drive
-40 -100 -100 200 -57.1429 - -25
Interstate Dr &
Gateway Drive
20 Increase by 3
Increase by
1
-100 1700 - 200
Fredrick Rd &
Gateway Drive
-100 -100 -100 - -100 - -100
Fox Run Pkwy& W
Point Ave
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total -25.0 350.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 - 26.3
17. DATA ANALYSIS
• RE Crashes
• Before: April 2010 –April2013
• Before Crash
Intersection
(BEFORE)
April 2010 –
April2013
Severity
Number
Injured
Number
Killed
Number
crashPDO
Possible
Injury
Non-
Incapacitatin
g Injury
Incapacitating
Injury
Pepperell
Parkway&
Gateway Drive
5.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 2.0 0.0 6.7
Interstate Dr &
Gateway Drive
4.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 4.3
Fredrick Rd &
Gateway Drive
8.3 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 9.3
Fox Run Pkwy& W
Point Ave
3.7 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 5.0
Total 21.0 3.0 1.0 0.3 5.0 0.0 25.3
18. DATA ANALYSIS
• RE Crashes
• After: April 2013- April 2014
• Before Crash
Intersection
(AFTER)
April 2013 – April
2014
Severity
Number
Injured
Number
Killed
Number
crashPDO
Possible
Injury
Non-
Incapacitatin
g Injury
Incapacitating
Injury
Pepperell
Parkway&
Gateway Drive
27 5 1 1 1 0 34
Interstate Dr &
Gateway Drive
34 10 5 1 24 0 50
Fredrick Rd &
Gateway Drive
29 7 0 1 12 0 37
Fox Run Pkwy& W
Point Ave
16 0 0 0 0 0 16
Total 106 22 6 3 37 0 137
19. Percentage of Change
• RE Crashes
• Before Crash
Intersection
Severity
Number
Injured
Number
Killed
Number
crashPDO
Possible
Injury
Non-
Incapacitatin
g Injury
Incapacitating
Injury
Pepperell
Parkway&
Gateway Drive
440 650 50 200 -50 - 410
Interstate Dr &
Gateway Drive
750 2900 Increase by 5 Increase by 1 7100 - 1054
Fredrick Rd &
Gateway Drive
248 950 -100 Increase by 1 1100 - 296
Fox Run Pkwy& W
Point Ave
336 -100 - - -100 - 220
Total 405 633 500
Increase by
2.7
640 - 441
No studies were found to evaluate the safety effectiveness of RLCs in Alabama
National survey of drivers in communities with and without camera showed that the majority of drivers support this program.
opponents claim this system is a tool to gather revenue for government. Considering the controversial nature of RLCs, sufficient researches are needed to prove there is a safety concern in deploying photo enforcement. Safety benefits needs to be realized for selected sites and then sites should be selected for treatment by government officials.
Beginning April 1, 2013, RLCs were turned on at four different intersections in Opelika, AL.
The overall safety effect of the installed RLCs at those intersections is not clear.
The costs from the increase in REs were offset by benefits from decrease in RAs
crashes in the intersection physical area where violator is running the light plus rear-end crashes that are the consequence of camera installation occurring in the approach queue. Since these types of crashes are not clearly defined in crash reports, a combination of related variables was used to make an estimate
These three are not always recorded
Combined
Found where crash occured
These three are not always recorded
Combined
Found where crash occured
All has the same node #
Deal with this problem?
These three are not always recorded
Combined
Found where crash occured