Eyebeam participated in ElectroSmog, a new festival that revolves around the concept of Sustainable Immobility. The festival, which takes place simultaneously at many locations around the world, introduces and explores the concept of sustainable immobility in both theory and practice, with discussions, workshops, and performances taking place at each of the festival partners' home bases.
ElectroSmog SkillShare: Tools and Models for Online Collaboration
1. Collaborative Futures
A free collaborative book about the future of free collaboration @ Transmediale 2010
NYC Book Launch / Upgrade NY @Eyebeam / March 4th 2010
5. The authors
✤ Adam Hyde - Floss Manuals, artist
✤ Mike Linksvayer - VP Creative Commons
✤ Marta Peirano - Copyfight, journalist
✤ Alan Toner - Steal This Film, researcher
✤ Michael Mandiberg - Eyebeam, artist
✤ Mushon Zer-Aviv - Eyebeam, designer
✤ Aleksander Erkalovic (programmer) - Floss Manuals
12. Sample 1:
Open Relationships
✤ Like romantic relationships, open collaborations are based on mutual
trust
✤ In an open relationship a different social pact governs the
relationship.
13. Sample 1:
Open Relationships
✤ Like romantic relationships, open collaborations are based on mutual
trust
✤ In an open relationship a different social pact governs the
relationship.
✤ Make sure you cover the basics: coordination, transparency,
attribution, autonomy, generosity, respect and freedom of movement.
16. Sample 3:
Sharing is the First Step
✤ UGC, Social Media - confusion between sharing & collaboration
17. Sample 3:
Sharing is the First Step
✤ UGC, Social Media - confusion between sharing & collaboration
✤ "This is who I am. This is what I did."
18. Sample 3:
Sharing is the First Step
✤ UGC, Social Media - confusion between sharing & collaboration
✤ "This is who I am. This is what I did."
✤ identity + social objects = direct attribution, one to many
19. Sample 3:
Sharing is the First Step
✤ UGC, Social Media - confusion between sharing & collaboration
✤ "This is who I am. This is what I did."
✤ identity + social objects = direct attribution, one to many
✤ social objects + identities = indirect attribution, many to many
22. Sample 3:
Sharing is the First Step
✤ Adding a layer of coordination:
✤ "use the #iranelections hashtag on your tweets"
23. Sample 3:
Sharing is the First Step
✤ Adding a layer of coordination:
✤ "use the #iranelections hashtag on your tweets"
✤ social objects + coordination = new (collaborative) social object
24. Sample 3:
Sharing is the First Step
✤ Adding a layer of coordination:
✤ "use the #iranelections hashtag on your tweets"
✤ social objects + coordination = new (collaborative) social object
✤ “Edits” (Wikis) or “commits” (open source) loose their individual
meaning outside the collaborative context
29. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Coordinating Mechanisms create Contexts:
✤ coordination & governance mechanisms - both technical & social.
✤ Technical Coordination and Mediation:
✤ Wikis and version control systems: contrib+user+time
30. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Coordinating Mechanisms create Contexts:
✤ coordination & governance mechanisms - both technical & social.
✤ Technical Coordination and Mediation:
✤ Wikis and version control systems: contrib+user+time
✤ “diff”
31. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Coordinating Mechanisms create Contexts:
✤ coordination & governance mechanisms - both technical & social.
✤ Technical Coordination and Mediation:
✤ Wikis and version control systems: contrib+user+time
✤ “diff”
✤ Lower the friction but does not eliminate it
34. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Social Contracts and Mediation:
✤ First Wikipedia edit determines the tone of the article - leadership
35. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Social Contracts and Mediation:
✤ First Wikipedia edit determines the tone of the article - leadership
✤ Social contract - collaborative goal:
to make the article more accurate and factual
36. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Social Contracts and Mediation:
✤ First Wikipedia edit determines the tone of the article - leadership
✤ Social contract - collaborative goal:
to make the article more accurate and factual
✤ “If you're going against what the majority of people perceive to be
reality, you're the one who's crazy”
http://tiny.booki.cc/?wikiality
40. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Wikiality:
✤ “African Elephant” was protected (locked)
✤ Wikipedia banned stephencolbert - an unverified celebrity name
41. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Wikiality:
✤ “African Elephant” was protected (locked)
✤ Wikipedia banned stephencolbert - an unverified celebrity name
✤ Vandalism?
42. Sample 4:
Coordination & Contexts
✤ Wikiality:
✤ “African Elephant” was protected (locked)
✤ Wikipedia banned stephencolbert - an unverified celebrity name
✤ Vandalism?
✤ Or just a collaboration under a different social contract?
45. Sample 5:
On Intentional collaboration
✤ www.thru-you.com
✤ Is intention essential to collaboration?
46. Sample 5:
On Intentional collaboration
✤ www.thru-you.com
✤ Is intention essential to collaboration?
✤ What about Google Pagerank algorithm?
47. Sample 5:
On Intentional collaboration
✤ www.thru-you.com
✤ Is intention essential to collaboration?
✤ What about Google Pagerank algorithm?
✤ Intention of action vs. intention of context
48. Sample 5:
On Intentional collaboration
✤ www.thru-you.com
✤ Is intention essential to collaboration?
✤ What about Google Pagerank algorithm?
✤ Intention of action vs. intention of context
✤ Shared goals
51. Sample 6:
Collaborationism
✤ Collaboration with “the enemy”
✤ Galit Eilat at Dictionary of War / Novi Sad (01:40-02:14)
52. Sample 6:
Collaborationism
✤ Collaboration with “the enemy”
✤ Galit Eilat at Dictionary of War / Novi Sad (01:40-02:14)
✤ Context and conflict
53. Sample 6:
Collaborationism
✤ Collaboration with “the enemy”
✤ Galit Eilat at Dictionary of War / Novi Sad (01:40-02:14)
✤ Context and conflict
✤ The nonhuman quality of networks (The Exploit - Galloway/Thacker)
54. Sample 6:
Collaborationism
✤ Collaboration with “the enemy”
✤ Galit Eilat at Dictionary of War / Novi Sad (01:40-02:14)
✤ Context and conflict
✤ The nonhuman quality of networks (The Exploit - Galloway/Thacker)
✤ Tension between individual identities and group identities
55. Sample 6:
Collaborationism
✤ Collaboration with “the enemy”
✤ Galit Eilat at Dictionary of War / Novi Sad (01:40-02:14)
✤ Context and conflict
✤ The nonhuman quality of networks (The Exploit - Galloway/Thacker)
✤ Tension between individual identities and group identities
✤ ‘Better a complex identity than an identity complex’ (The Digital
Given - Ippolito/Lovink/Rossiter)
57. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ ...jump back to the world of flesh meetings, slow readings and the
realities of unpokeability by committing ritual suicide. Online:
58. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ ...jump back to the world of flesh meetings, slow readings and the
realities of unpokeability by committing ritual suicide. Online:
✤ "As the Seppuku restores samurai's honor as a warrior, in the same way,
Seppukoo.com deals with the liberation of the digital body...”
Seppukoo.com
59. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ ...jump back to the world of flesh meetings, slow readings and the
realities of unpokeability by committing ritual suicide. Online:
✤ "As the Seppuku restores samurai's honor as a warrior, in the same way,
Seppukoo.com deals with the liberation of the digital body...”
Seppukoo.com
✤ "This machine lets you delete all your energy sucking social-networking
profiles, kill your fake virtual friends, and completely do away with your Web
Web 2.0 Suicide Machine
62. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ Ceased and Deceased
✤ “...asking other users to share their login data, entering other people's accounts, collecting
other user's information, spamming and using Facebook's Intellectual Property without
permission.”
63. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ Ceased and Deceased
✤ “...asking other users to share their login data, entering other people's accounts, collecting
other user's information, spamming and using Facebook's Intellectual Property without
permission.”
✤ Who is the offender? The sites or the users?
64. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ Ceased and Deceased
✤ “...asking other users to share their login data, entering other people's accounts, collecting
other user's information, spamming and using Facebook's Intellectual Property without
permission.”
✤ Who is the offender? The sites or the users?
✤ “The right to life is an inalienable right inherent in us by virtue of our existence...” Can
the same be said about our owned life?
65. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ Ceased and Deceased
✤ “...asking other users to share their login data, entering other people's accounts, collecting
other user's information, spamming and using Facebook's Intellectual Property without
permission.”
✤ Who is the offender? The sites or the users?
✤ “The right to life is an inalienable right inherent in us by virtue of our existence...” Can
the same be said about our owned life?
✤ “A life owned by a dot.com company is not worth living...”
66. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ Ceased and Deceased
✤ “...asking other users to share their login data, entering other people's accounts, collecting
other user's information, spamming and using Facebook's Intellectual Property without
permission.”
✤ Who is the offender? The sites or the users?
✤ “The right to life is an inalienable right inherent in us by virtue of our existence...” Can
the same be said about our owned life?
✤ “A life owned by a dot.com company is not worth living...”
✤ “The ritual itself is essential, as it stands as a gesture of independence from the platform,
the community and the commercial interests...”
67. Sample 6:
Death Is Not The End
✤ Ceased and Deceased
✤ “...asking other users to share their login data, entering other people's accounts, collecting
other user's information, spamming and using Facebook's Intellectual Property without
permission.”
✤ Who is the offender? The sites or the users?
✤ “The right to life is an inalienable right inherent in us by virtue of our existence...” Can
the same be said about our owned life?
✤ “A life owned by a dot.com company is not worth living...”
✤ “The ritual itself is essential, as it stands as a gesture of independence from the platform,
the community and the commercial interests...”
✤ Assisted suicide & the right to leave.
71. Knock Knock
✤ The anonymous contributor
✤ “Where do I sign up?”
72. Knock Knock
✤ The anonymous contributor
✤ “Where do I sign up?”
✤ We were not in stealth mode, we were online!
73. Knock Knock
✤ The anonymous contributor
✤ “Where do I sign up?”
✤ We were not in stealth mode, we were online!
✤ No social or technical mechanism for managing external contribution
76. Are we interested?
✤ How do we introduce personal accounts?
✤ Do we ignore and say “we”?
77. Are we interested?
✤ How do we introduce personal accounts?
✤ Do we ignore and say “we”?
✤ Do we quote ourselves?
78. Are we interested?
✤ How do we introduce personal accounts?
✤ Do we ignore and say “we”?
✤ Do we quote ourselves?
✤ Can we quote what’s never been written or even said?
79. Are we interested?
✤ How do we introduce personal accounts?
✤ Do we ignore and say “we”?
✤ Do we quote ourselves?
✤ Can we quote what’s never been written or even said?
✤ Oops... complex identity/identity complex?
80. Things We Did Not Cover
Crowdsourcing & Mechanical Turk / Internal collaboration in for-
profit businesses / Piracy / Relative maintenance efforts of
collaborative and free / culture projects / Interns / FLOSS zealotry
and License fascism and Free Culture as an atheistic faith / Free
Culture posturing, and not walking / the talk / Open Source and
design / Scaling collaborations / Failure (it was not an option) / The
cost of failure / Tolerance of errors / The pain of confronting
ideologies / How to collaborate with people you don't agree with /
So much more...
81. Get The Book
✤ Read it online (html, epub, pdf):
http://en.flossmanuals.net/CollaborativeFutures/
✤ Print it yourself (POD - Print On Demand)
✤ Fix the typos:
http://booki.cc/collaborativefutures/edit/
✤ Buy the “dead tree version” NOW!
✤ Questions?