SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 36
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Defamation: Action and Defences
•What constitutes
defamation?
•When does
defamation occur?
•How can you
defend yourself?
Notes prepared by Paul Bethell & Martin Hirst
DEFAMATION
• The law that most affects journalists, writers and
publishers
• Competing rights – free speech against right to
defend reputation
• History of Defamation law in Australia – formerly
different state and territory laws
• New laws introduced by all states and territories in
2006 now unify the law right across Australia
Defamation – a definition
• For a defamation action to be successful,
three elements must be satisfied:
1. the information was communicated by the defendant to a third
person other than the plaintiff (publication);
2. the material identifies the plaintiff (identification); and
3. the information/material contains matter that is defamatory,
regardless of whether the material was intentionally published or
not (defamatory matter).
What is defamation?
At its simplest, defamation is to
spread bad reports about someone
which could do them harm.
DEFAMATION
• It can be a VERY LONG process.
• It can be VERY EXPENSIVE – for both sides.
• Many cases don’t get to court as a result.
• New laws made some attempt at reform
• Personal damages capped at @$300,000 – but
per publication?
• Aggravated damages also possible
• Costs can also be awarded and can be HUGE!
DEFAMATION
• At the heart of defamation is the
concept of a lowered “reputation”
• Lawyers work on “imputations” –
what are the main messages or
impressions that the average
consumer/reader/viewer/listener
would get?
• The intention of the
writer/broadcaster isn’t important
DEFAMATION
• “I'M THE VICTIM, WAILS BOOZING,
POT-SMOKING, VIOLENT,
RACIST, COWARDLY,
UNAPOLOGETIC, LYING, ODIOUS,
TRANSFER-LISTED LEE BOWYER
(NOW TRY TO SUE US YOU LITTLE
SCUMBAG!) “
Daily Mirror (UK), 19 Dec 2001
• What are the ‘imputations’ of this
story?
DEFAMATION
• An action for defamation doesn’t RESTORE your
reputation but merely allows you to seek damages
for pain and suffering or for economic loss.
• “Slander” and “libel” distinction now abolished - Use
the term “defamation” in all cases.
• It is mainly a CIVIL law matter – so PLAINTIFFS SUE
DEFENDANTS . Defendants are found either LIABLE
or NOT LIABLE for DAMAGES and also COSTS.
DEFAMATION
• CHECKLIST APPROACH:
• Best to take it step by step:
• Is there a defamation in theory?
• Is the plaintiff identified?
• Has there been ‘publication’?
• Are there any defences available?
DEFAMATION
• 1. IS THERE A DEFAMATION IN
THEORY?
• Concept of REPUTATION.
• Courts will look for “imputations” -
What others think about you
• NOT what you think about yourself
• PERSONAL REPUTATION
• PROFESSIONAL REPUTATION
DEFAMATION
• TEST FOR DEFAMATORY MATERIAL - Ask -
does the material -
• EXPOSE THE PERSON TO HATRED
CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE?
• LOWER THE PERSON ‘IN THE ESTIMATION
OF A RIGHT-THINKING MEMBER OF
SOCIETY’?
• CAUSE THE PERSON TO BE ‘SHUNNED OR
AVOIDED’?
DEFAMATION
• It doesn’t have to be words. Cartoons,
photographs, video, even the layout of stories
on a page can be a problem…..
• The test is: “HOW WOULD THE ORDINARY
PERSON INTERPRET IT? WHAT MEANING
WOULD THE ORDINARY PERSON GET FROM
THE MATERIAL?
• Negatives and denials are no defence.
• Mistaken identity no defence
DEFAMATION
• 2. IS THE PLAINTIFF IDENTIFIED?
• In order to have your reputation
lowered you need to be identified
• Beware INNUENDO
• Important to be precise about the person you are
writing about (“Detective Lee” case 1934).
• Beware using fictitious names – Artemus Jones case
1910. See Pearson 4e pp:196-198
DEFAMATION
• Groups of people can sue – IF they are thought
to be referred to – Mount Druitt Case 2000.
• “Corporations” with more than 10 employees +
“public bodies” like councils CANNOT sue.
• But charities and not-for-profit organisations
CAN still sue.
• The dead can’t sue (except in Tasmania).
The class we failed
• Implication students
had failed their HSC
exams
• Identified individuals as
members of this group
of failed students
• Students successfully
sued and won an
apology
On 8 January 1997, the Daily Telegraph
published the headline, "The class we
failed" concerning was the Year 12 class at
Mount Druitt High School in outer Western
Sydney in which no student scored a
Tertiary Entrance Rank (TER) above 50
(the maximum possible mark is 100).
Although the article made clear that the
newspaper believed that the state had
failed the students, many accused the
Telegraph of branding the students
themselves as failures and showing a full
year photo identifying students.
DEFAMATION
• 3. HAS THERE BEEN PUBLICATION?
• Must be communicated to a third party.
• The medium doesn’t matter
• Publication is where the material is RECEIVED
(Dow Jones v. Gutnick 2002).
• Anyone involved in publication can be sued
• Anonymity online isn’t guaranteed
• Actions can be brought up to 1 year from
publication.
DEFAMATION
• RECAP ON DEFAMATION ESSENTIALS:
• Has a reputation been lowered?
• Is the plaintiff identified?
• Has there been ‘publication’?
• If all these are satisfied,
then the court will discuss
whether there is a defence.
DEFAMATION DEFENCES
• The defences split into two categories:
• Those that are based on the material complained
of being true (Truth and Honest Opinion)
• Those that can succeed even if the material isn’t
true
(Absolute Privilege, Fair Report and Qualified
Privilege, Innocent Dissemination, Triviality, Offer
of Amends).
DEFAMATION
• TRUTH OR JUSTIFICATION DEFENCE
• Truth doesn’t lower a reputation, it corrects it.
• Material published must be “substantially
true”.
• However, truth needs to be proved – evidence
is needed
• Standard of proof - ‘on a balance of
HONEST OPINION
• Relates mainly to opinion, comment, reviews and
criticism.
• Opinion pages, editorials, sports, arts, film, music,
restaurant reviews and also to letters and possibly
weblogs and online comments.
A newspaper in Sydney has been successfully sued by a
restaurant group after one of their food critics wrote a scathing
review of his experience in their establishment.
The Australian courts have ordered John Fairfax Publications, the
owners of The Sydney Morning Herald, to pay the owners of the
Sydney restaurant, Coco Roco, on charges of defamation.
HONEST OPINION
• It must relate to a matter of public interest
• The opinion must be based on “proper
material” – either true facts or matters
protected by privilege.
• This “proper material” must be contained
in the publication, or must be widely
known.
• The opinion must be “honestly held” – that
is the action is not malicious
FAIR REPORT
• Protects “fair and accurate” reports of court and
parliament
• Also includes other meetings such as:
proceedings of “a sport or recreation association”,
a “trade association”, a “public meeting…. of
shareholders”
• or a “public meeting (with or without restriction
on the people attending) held anywhere in
Australia if the proceedings relate to a matter of
public interest”.
allows free communication in certain
relationships without the risk of an action for
defamation –
generally where the person communicating the
statement has a legal, moral or social duty to
make it and the recipient has a corresponding
interest in receiving it
QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE
Matters raised on the floor of the legislature (state & federal); OR
statements made in the course of judicial proceedings made by parties,
witness, legal representative, members of the jury, or by the judge attracts
ABSOLUTE PRIVILEGE
The defence of absolute privilege is attached to the occasion and not the
content
QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE
• Allows things to be published that may be
defamatory even if they can’t be proved
• Must involve important, urgent matters and
issues that should be brought to public
attention
• But the journalist must act “reasonably in the
circumstances” – high standards and motives
are required
QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE
• What does “reasonably in the
circumstances” mean?
• the extent to which the matter is
of public interest and whether it
needed to be published urgently
• the extent to which the matter
relates to the performance of
public functions or activities of
the plaintiff
• how serious the defamatory
imputation is
QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE
• the extent to which suspicion,
allegation and proven fact is
distinguished
• the integrity of the sources
• whether there was a
reasonable attempt to get the
plaintiff’s side of the story and
publish this response
• the steps taken to verify the
information.
POLITICAL QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE
• Lange v. Australian Broadcasting Corporation
1997 – Common law case
• Australian constitution contained an “implied
guarantee” that people in Australia should be free
to discuss matters of government and politics
• But publication must be “reasonable in the
circumstances”
• Common Law Qualified Privilege – relates to
personal disclosures
INNOCENT DISSEMINATION
• Gives protection to people who sell or distribute
defamatory material but who couldn’t be
expected to know that it was defamatory.
• But would rarely be available to journalists, writers
or publishers – except with live broadcasting “in
which the broadcaster has no effective control
over the person who makes the statements”
“newsagent’s defence”
INNOCENT DISSEMINATION
• It typically would affect newsagents or libraries
• Doesn’t affect Internet Service Providers
• But controversial for weblogs and discussion
forums
• ISPs are deemed to have “no effective control”
over websites
• But the websites ARE deemed to have “effective
control” over people who post on them
TRIVIALITY
• “It is a defence to the publication of
defamatory matter if the defendant proves that
the circumstances of publication were such
that the plaintiff was unlikely to sustain any
harm.”
• Possible defence for comedy and satire – no-
one is expected to take it seriously and so there
is no consequent damage to reputation
OFFER OF AMENDS DEFENCE
• Without accepting liability, a publisher can make
an “offer to make amends”
• Needs to be made in writing “as soon as
practicable” after the publisher became aware of
the alleged defamation,
• But must be within 28 days of a written
complaint being made about the material which
details the plaintiff’s concerns.
OFFER OF AMENDS
DEFENCE
• It MUST contain an offer to
publish a correction
• It MUST contain an offer to pay
any reasonable expenses incurred by
the plaintiff (the costs of legal advice)
• It MAY contain an offer of an apology
• It MAY contain an offer to pay
compensation for economic damages
OFFER OF AMENDS DEFENCE
• Can be a complete defence – even if refused by
the plaintiff - as long as it is:
• “reasonable in all the circumstances”, taking into
account things like:
• the prominence and speed of the correction or
apology
• the extent to which it reached the same
audience or readership as the initial defamation.
NON-DEFAMATION REMEDIES
• Battle in negotiations over the new defamation
laws about whether businesses could use
defamation
• The new Defamation Acts prevent “corporations”
of more than 10 employees from suing.
• It means businesses must look to other legal
remedies when their business reputation is
damaged.
TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974
• Applies to “corporations” in the course of “trade
and commerce”
• S.52(1) deceptive and misleading conduct
• S. 53 False or misleading representations
• Can be sued by anyone who feels they were
misled or deceived and by anyone who claims
they’ve lost money as a result of being misled or
deceived….
TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974
• BUT - Section 65A Defence:
• S.52 and 53 do not apply to “prescribed
information providers”
• Defined as “a person who carries on a business of
providing information”
• So news organisations – a bit like “innocent
disseminators” – they can’t vouch for the
information provided to them by interviewees and
other sources
Reading
• Pearson: Journalist’s guide 4e Ch.8-9
• Pearson: Blogging & tweeting Ch.2
• Leiboff: Creative Practive Ch.6

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Defamation Law in India
Defamation Law in IndiaDefamation Law in India
Defamation Law in India
 
Journalism Law
Journalism LawJournalism Law
Journalism Law
 
Journalism law
Journalism lawJournalism law
Journalism law
 
Media law
Media lawMedia law
Media law
 
Social media and defamation law (watermarked)
Social media and defamation law (watermarked) Social media and defamation law (watermarked)
Social media and defamation law (watermarked)
 
Defamation-Meaning & Nature
Defamation-Meaning & NatureDefamation-Meaning & Nature
Defamation-Meaning & Nature
 
Law of defamation
Law of defamationLaw of defamation
Law of defamation
 
Libel 101
Libel 101Libel 101
Libel 101
 
Defamation ppt
Defamation pptDefamation ppt
Defamation ppt
 
Defamation
DefamationDefamation
Defamation
 
Defences to defamation
Defences to defamationDefences to defamation
Defences to defamation
 
Law of defamation
Law of defamationLaw of defamation
Law of defamation
 
Censorship and Media (COMM514): Session #2
Censorship and Media (COMM514): Session #2Censorship and Media (COMM514): Session #2
Censorship and Media (COMM514): Session #2
 
Journalism Law for Copy Editors
Journalism Law for Copy EditorsJournalism Law for Copy Editors
Journalism Law for Copy Editors
 
Media Ethics: Privacy
Media Ethics: PrivacyMedia Ethics: Privacy
Media Ethics: Privacy
 
Defamation on the internet
Defamation on the internetDefamation on the internet
Defamation on the internet
 
Press Law
Press LawPress Law
Press Law
 
Law, Ethics, and Social Media: A Primer on Copyright Law, Fair Use, and Defam...
Law, Ethics, and Social Media: A Primer on Copyright Law, Fair Use, and Defam...Law, Ethics, and Social Media: A Primer on Copyright Law, Fair Use, and Defam...
Law, Ethics, and Social Media: A Primer on Copyright Law, Fair Use, and Defam...
 
The Law of Print Media
The Law of Print MediaThe Law of Print Media
The Law of Print Media
 
Social media law
Social media law Social media law
Social media law
 

Andere mochten auch

The law of defamation, asba fall 2014
The law of defamation, asba fall 2014The law of defamation, asba fall 2014
The law of defamation, asba fall 2014JEAlexander
 
Defamation
DefamationDefamation
Defamationchhlax
 
Presentation2 by yash vardhan
Presentation2 by yash vardhanPresentation2 by yash vardhan
Presentation2 by yash vardhanYash Vardhan
 
Invol powerpoint 2011 2
Invol powerpoint 2011 2Invol powerpoint 2011 2
Invol powerpoint 2011 2Miss Hart
 
Directing & Controling
Directing & ControlingDirecting & Controling
Directing & ControlingParth Pawar
 
Introduction to tort
Introduction to tortIntroduction to tort
Introduction to tortwaseemkhanpbn
 
Mass Media and Society Chapter 14: Ethics
Mass Media and Society Chapter 14: EthicsMass Media and Society Chapter 14: Ethics
Mass Media and Society Chapter 14: Ethicsczavisca
 
Unit 4 staffing-directing
Unit 4 staffing-directingUnit 4 staffing-directing
Unit 4 staffing-directingRadhika Gohel
 
Co-ordination and Controling
Co-ordination and ControlingCo-ordination and Controling
Co-ordination and ControlingPadum Chetry
 
Ll.b i lot u 1 origin, nature and scope of law of tort
Ll.b i lot u 1 origin, nature and scope of law of tortLl.b i lot u 1 origin, nature and scope of law of tort
Ll.b i lot u 1 origin, nature and scope of law of tortRai University
 
5517492 Legal Environment Of Business
5517492 Legal Environment Of Business5517492 Legal Environment Of Business
5517492 Legal Environment Of Businessmayank2012
 
law of defamation in india
law of defamation in indialaw of defamation in india
law of defamation in indiaYogesh Apte
 
Directing & controling
Directing & controlingDirecting & controling
Directing & controlingManoj Reddy
 
Legal System: Type of law, Torts and Liabilities
Legal System: Type of law, Torts and Liabilities Legal System: Type of law, Torts and Liabilities
Legal System: Type of law, Torts and Liabilities Ajeshkumar Tk
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Defamation ppt
Defamation pptDefamation ppt
Defamation ppt
 
The law of defamation, asba fall 2014
The law of defamation, asba fall 2014The law of defamation, asba fall 2014
The law of defamation, asba fall 2014
 
Defamation
DefamationDefamation
Defamation
 
Presentation2 by yash vardhan
Presentation2 by yash vardhanPresentation2 by yash vardhan
Presentation2 by yash vardhan
 
Invol powerpoint 2011 2
Invol powerpoint 2011 2Invol powerpoint 2011 2
Invol powerpoint 2011 2
 
Directing & Controling
Directing & ControlingDirecting & Controling
Directing & Controling
 
Introduction to tort
Introduction to tortIntroduction to tort
Introduction to tort
 
Coordination
CoordinationCoordination
Coordination
 
Mass Media and Society Chapter 14: Ethics
Mass Media and Society Chapter 14: EthicsMass Media and Society Chapter 14: Ethics
Mass Media and Society Chapter 14: Ethics
 
Unit 4 staffing-directing
Unit 4 staffing-directingUnit 4 staffing-directing
Unit 4 staffing-directing
 
Co-ordination and Controling
Co-ordination and ControlingCo-ordination and Controling
Co-ordination and Controling
 
Ll.b i lot u 1 origin, nature and scope of law of tort
Ll.b i lot u 1 origin, nature and scope of law of tortLl.b i lot u 1 origin, nature and scope of law of tort
Ll.b i lot u 1 origin, nature and scope of law of tort
 
5517492 Legal Environment Of Business
5517492 Legal Environment Of Business5517492 Legal Environment Of Business
5517492 Legal Environment Of Business
 
law of defamation in india
law of defamation in indialaw of defamation in india
law of defamation in india
 
Theory x & y- Marketing
Theory x & y- MarketingTheory x & y- Marketing
Theory x & y- Marketing
 
Directing
DirectingDirecting
Directing
 
Directing
DirectingDirecting
Directing
 
Unit 6 directing
Unit 6 directingUnit 6 directing
Unit 6 directing
 
Directing & controling
Directing & controlingDirecting & controling
Directing & controling
 
Legal System: Type of law, Torts and Liabilities
Legal System: Type of law, Torts and Liabilities Legal System: Type of law, Torts and Liabilities
Legal System: Type of law, Torts and Liabilities
 

Ähnlich wie ALJ724 defamation lecture 2013

An introduction to defamation
An introduction to defamationAn introduction to defamation
An introduction to defamationCaroline Sutton
 
A Closer Look at Privacy
A Closer Look at PrivacyA Closer Look at Privacy
A Closer Look at PrivacyDan Kennedy
 
Public Relations Legal Considerations
Public Relations Legal ConsiderationsPublic Relations Legal Considerations
Public Relations Legal ConsiderationsBrett Atwood
 
A Closer Look at Privacy
A Closer Look at PrivacyA Closer Look at Privacy
A Closer Look at PrivacyDan Kennedy
 
Libel and the Media
Libel and the MediaLibel and the Media
Libel and the MediaDan Kennedy
 
setting up the evidence.pptx
setting up the evidence.pptxsetting up the evidence.pptx
setting up the evidence.pptxgndlsnhscomplab
 
12 rules of journalism
12 rules of journalism12 rules of journalism
12 rules of journalismnadziiee
 
12 rules of journalism
12 rules of journalism12 rules of journalism
12 rules of journalismnadziiee
 
Libel and the media
Libel and the mediaLibel and the media
Libel and the mediaDan Kennedy
 
Assignment 2 ethics 16th jan 2013
Assignment 2 ethics 16th jan 2013Assignment 2 ethics 16th jan 2013
Assignment 2 ethics 16th jan 2013btecmedia12
 
Pppresslawprimer
PppresslawprimerPppresslawprimer
PppresslawprimerBrad Lewis
 
Defamation Law in India
Defamation Law in India Defamation Law in India
Defamation Law in India Law Laboratory
 
COM 101 Chapter 16
COM 101 Chapter 16COM 101 Chapter 16
COM 101 Chapter 16Val Bello
 
Tipping the scales - Sian Harrison
Tipping the scales - Sian HarrisonTipping the scales - Sian Harrison
Tipping the scales - Sian HarrisonJournalismHSAD
 
Media law & ethics
Media law & ethicsMedia law & ethics
Media law & ethicsLady Lee
 

Ähnlich wie ALJ724 defamation lecture 2013 (20)

An introduction to defamation
An introduction to defamationAn introduction to defamation
An introduction to defamation
 
A Closer Look at Privacy
A Closer Look at PrivacyA Closer Look at Privacy
A Closer Look at Privacy
 
Defamation
DefamationDefamation
Defamation
 
Public Relations Legal Considerations
Public Relations Legal ConsiderationsPublic Relations Legal Considerations
Public Relations Legal Considerations
 
A Closer Look at Privacy
A Closer Look at PrivacyA Closer Look at Privacy
A Closer Look at Privacy
 
Libel and the Media
Libel and the MediaLibel and the Media
Libel and the Media
 
setting up the evidence.pptx
setting up the evidence.pptxsetting up the evidence.pptx
setting up the evidence.pptx
 
12 rules of journalism
12 rules of journalism12 rules of journalism
12 rules of journalism
 
12 rules of journalism
12 rules of journalism12 rules of journalism
12 rules of journalism
 
Libel and the media
Libel and the mediaLibel and the media
Libel and the media
 
Assignment 2 ethics 16th jan 2013
Assignment 2 ethics 16th jan 2013Assignment 2 ethics 16th jan 2013
Assignment 2 ethics 16th jan 2013
 
Pppresslawprimer
PppresslawprimerPppresslawprimer
Pppresslawprimer
 
Defamation Law in India
Defamation Law in India Defamation Law in India
Defamation Law in India
 
COM 101 Chapter 16
COM 101 Chapter 16COM 101 Chapter 16
COM 101 Chapter 16
 
Media law
Media lawMedia law
Media law
 
Blogging Law
Blogging LawBlogging Law
Blogging Law
 
Week 2
Week 2Week 2
Week 2
 
Tipping the scales - Sian Harrison
Tipping the scales - Sian HarrisonTipping the scales - Sian Harrison
Tipping the scales - Sian Harrison
 
Journalism rights & laws
Journalism rights & lawsJournalism rights & laws
Journalism rights & laws
 
Media law & ethics
Media law & ethicsMedia law & ethics
Media law & ethics
 

Mehr von Martin Hirst

Politics and art 1900 1940 presentation
Politics and art 1900 1940 presentationPolitics and art 1900 1940 presentation
Politics and art 1900 1940 presentationMartin Hirst
 
Photojournalism 1 2013
Photojournalism 1 2013Photojournalism 1 2013
Photojournalism 1 2013Martin Hirst
 
Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expression
Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expressionFreedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expression
Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expressionMartin Hirst
 
The ethico legal paradox and Harry Hotpants in Las Vegas
The ethico legal paradox and Harry Hotpants in Las VegasThe ethico legal paradox and Harry Hotpants in Las Vegas
The ethico legal paradox and Harry Hotpants in Las VegasMartin Hirst
 
Ethics in Social Media: Digital Dilemmas?
Ethics in Social Media: Digital Dilemmas?Ethics in Social Media: Digital Dilemmas?
Ethics in Social Media: Digital Dilemmas?Martin Hirst
 
2013 reassessment - News 2.0
2013 reassessment - News 2.0 2013 reassessment - News 2.0
2013 reassessment - News 2.0 Martin Hirst
 
Writing a blog 2013
Writing a blog 2013Writing a blog 2013
Writing a blog 2013Martin Hirst
 
Media law for today
Media law for todayMedia law for today
Media law for todayMartin Hirst
 
News 2.0 What's changed in 18 months?
News 2.0 What's changed in 18 months?News 2.0 What's changed in 18 months?
News 2.0 What's changed in 18 months?Martin Hirst
 
Journalism jobs and skills mismatch
Journalism jobs and skills mismatchJournalism jobs and skills mismatch
Journalism jobs and skills mismatchMartin Hirst
 
Focus on the news feature
Focus on the news featureFocus on the news feature
Focus on the news featureMartin Hirst
 
Feature stories across the genres
Feature stories across the genresFeature stories across the genres
Feature stories across the genresMartin Hirst
 
Feature writing 2010
Feature writing 2010 Feature writing 2010
Feature writing 2010 Martin Hirst
 
Multimedia journalism may 2011
Multimedia journalism may 2011Multimedia journalism may 2011
Multimedia journalism may 2011Martin Hirst
 
Social media applications and arguments1
Social media applications and arguments1Social media applications and arguments1
Social media applications and arguments1Martin Hirst
 
Columns and blogs 2010
Columns and blogs 2010Columns and blogs 2010
Columns and blogs 2010Martin Hirst
 
Beyond inverted pyramid clean slides
Beyond inverted pyramid   clean slidesBeyond inverted pyramid   clean slides
Beyond inverted pyramid clean slidesMartin Hirst
 
International journalism job survey Charts jea 2010 2
International journalism job survey Charts jea 2010 2International journalism job survey Charts jea 2010 2
International journalism job survey Charts jea 2010 2Martin Hirst
 
Survey of journalism job market in Sept-Oct 2010
Survey of journalism job market in Sept-Oct 2010Survey of journalism job market in Sept-Oct 2010
Survey of journalism job market in Sept-Oct 2010Martin Hirst
 
Blogs bother me wjec 2010
Blogs bother me wjec 2010Blogs bother me wjec 2010
Blogs bother me wjec 2010Martin Hirst
 

Mehr von Martin Hirst (20)

Politics and art 1900 1940 presentation
Politics and art 1900 1940 presentationPolitics and art 1900 1940 presentation
Politics and art 1900 1940 presentation
 
Photojournalism 1 2013
Photojournalism 1 2013Photojournalism 1 2013
Photojournalism 1 2013
 
Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expression
Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expressionFreedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expression
Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expression
 
The ethico legal paradox and Harry Hotpants in Las Vegas
The ethico legal paradox and Harry Hotpants in Las VegasThe ethico legal paradox and Harry Hotpants in Las Vegas
The ethico legal paradox and Harry Hotpants in Las Vegas
 
Ethics in Social Media: Digital Dilemmas?
Ethics in Social Media: Digital Dilemmas?Ethics in Social Media: Digital Dilemmas?
Ethics in Social Media: Digital Dilemmas?
 
2013 reassessment - News 2.0
2013 reassessment - News 2.0 2013 reassessment - News 2.0
2013 reassessment - News 2.0
 
Writing a blog 2013
Writing a blog 2013Writing a blog 2013
Writing a blog 2013
 
Media law for today
Media law for todayMedia law for today
Media law for today
 
News 2.0 What's changed in 18 months?
News 2.0 What's changed in 18 months?News 2.0 What's changed in 18 months?
News 2.0 What's changed in 18 months?
 
Journalism jobs and skills mismatch
Journalism jobs and skills mismatchJournalism jobs and skills mismatch
Journalism jobs and skills mismatch
 
Focus on the news feature
Focus on the news featureFocus on the news feature
Focus on the news feature
 
Feature stories across the genres
Feature stories across the genresFeature stories across the genres
Feature stories across the genres
 
Feature writing 2010
Feature writing 2010 Feature writing 2010
Feature writing 2010
 
Multimedia journalism may 2011
Multimedia journalism may 2011Multimedia journalism may 2011
Multimedia journalism may 2011
 
Social media applications and arguments1
Social media applications and arguments1Social media applications and arguments1
Social media applications and arguments1
 
Columns and blogs 2010
Columns and blogs 2010Columns and blogs 2010
Columns and blogs 2010
 
Beyond inverted pyramid clean slides
Beyond inverted pyramid   clean slidesBeyond inverted pyramid   clean slides
Beyond inverted pyramid clean slides
 
International journalism job survey Charts jea 2010 2
International journalism job survey Charts jea 2010 2International journalism job survey Charts jea 2010 2
International journalism job survey Charts jea 2010 2
 
Survey of journalism job market in Sept-Oct 2010
Survey of journalism job market in Sept-Oct 2010Survey of journalism job market in Sept-Oct 2010
Survey of journalism job market in Sept-Oct 2010
 
Blogs bother me wjec 2010
Blogs bother me wjec 2010Blogs bother me wjec 2010
Blogs bother me wjec 2010
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationMJDuyan
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxraviapr7
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxDr. Santhosh Kumar. N
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?TechSoup
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesCeline George
 
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICEQuality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICESayali Powar
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.raviapr7
 
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRADUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRATanmoy Mishra
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptxCapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptxCapitolTechU
 
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptxCAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptxSaurabhParmar42
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxDr. Asif Anas
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsThe Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsEugene Lysak
 
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesHuman-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesMohammad Hassany
 
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxKatherine Villaluna
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
 
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICEQuality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
 
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
 
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quizFinals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
 
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRADUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
DUST OF SNOW_BY ROBERT FROST_EDITED BY_ TANMOY MISHRA
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
 
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
How to Add a New Field in Existing Kanban View in Odoo 17
 
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptxCapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
 
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdfPersonal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
 
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptxCAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
CAULIFLOWER BREEDING 1 Parmar pptx
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
 
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsThe Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
 
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming ClassesHuman-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
Human-AI Co-Creation of Worked Examples for Programming Classes
 
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
 

ALJ724 defamation lecture 2013

  • 1. Defamation: Action and Defences •What constitutes defamation? •When does defamation occur? •How can you defend yourself? Notes prepared by Paul Bethell & Martin Hirst
  • 2. DEFAMATION • The law that most affects journalists, writers and publishers • Competing rights – free speech against right to defend reputation • History of Defamation law in Australia – formerly different state and territory laws • New laws introduced by all states and territories in 2006 now unify the law right across Australia
  • 3. Defamation – a definition • For a defamation action to be successful, three elements must be satisfied: 1. the information was communicated by the defendant to a third person other than the plaintiff (publication); 2. the material identifies the plaintiff (identification); and 3. the information/material contains matter that is defamatory, regardless of whether the material was intentionally published or not (defamatory matter). What is defamation? At its simplest, defamation is to spread bad reports about someone which could do them harm.
  • 4. DEFAMATION • It can be a VERY LONG process. • It can be VERY EXPENSIVE – for both sides. • Many cases don’t get to court as a result. • New laws made some attempt at reform • Personal damages capped at @$300,000 – but per publication? • Aggravated damages also possible • Costs can also be awarded and can be HUGE!
  • 5. DEFAMATION • At the heart of defamation is the concept of a lowered “reputation” • Lawyers work on “imputations” – what are the main messages or impressions that the average consumer/reader/viewer/listener would get? • The intention of the writer/broadcaster isn’t important
  • 6. DEFAMATION • “I'M THE VICTIM, WAILS BOOZING, POT-SMOKING, VIOLENT, RACIST, COWARDLY, UNAPOLOGETIC, LYING, ODIOUS, TRANSFER-LISTED LEE BOWYER (NOW TRY TO SUE US YOU LITTLE SCUMBAG!) “ Daily Mirror (UK), 19 Dec 2001 • What are the ‘imputations’ of this story?
  • 7. DEFAMATION • An action for defamation doesn’t RESTORE your reputation but merely allows you to seek damages for pain and suffering or for economic loss. • “Slander” and “libel” distinction now abolished - Use the term “defamation” in all cases. • It is mainly a CIVIL law matter – so PLAINTIFFS SUE DEFENDANTS . Defendants are found either LIABLE or NOT LIABLE for DAMAGES and also COSTS.
  • 8. DEFAMATION • CHECKLIST APPROACH: • Best to take it step by step: • Is there a defamation in theory? • Is the plaintiff identified? • Has there been ‘publication’? • Are there any defences available?
  • 9. DEFAMATION • 1. IS THERE A DEFAMATION IN THEORY? • Concept of REPUTATION. • Courts will look for “imputations” - What others think about you • NOT what you think about yourself • PERSONAL REPUTATION • PROFESSIONAL REPUTATION
  • 10. DEFAMATION • TEST FOR DEFAMATORY MATERIAL - Ask - does the material - • EXPOSE THE PERSON TO HATRED CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE? • LOWER THE PERSON ‘IN THE ESTIMATION OF A RIGHT-THINKING MEMBER OF SOCIETY’? • CAUSE THE PERSON TO BE ‘SHUNNED OR AVOIDED’?
  • 11. DEFAMATION • It doesn’t have to be words. Cartoons, photographs, video, even the layout of stories on a page can be a problem….. • The test is: “HOW WOULD THE ORDINARY PERSON INTERPRET IT? WHAT MEANING WOULD THE ORDINARY PERSON GET FROM THE MATERIAL? • Negatives and denials are no defence. • Mistaken identity no defence
  • 12. DEFAMATION • 2. IS THE PLAINTIFF IDENTIFIED? • In order to have your reputation lowered you need to be identified • Beware INNUENDO • Important to be precise about the person you are writing about (“Detective Lee” case 1934). • Beware using fictitious names – Artemus Jones case 1910. See Pearson 4e pp:196-198
  • 13. DEFAMATION • Groups of people can sue – IF they are thought to be referred to – Mount Druitt Case 2000. • “Corporations” with more than 10 employees + “public bodies” like councils CANNOT sue. • But charities and not-for-profit organisations CAN still sue. • The dead can’t sue (except in Tasmania).
  • 14. The class we failed • Implication students had failed their HSC exams • Identified individuals as members of this group of failed students • Students successfully sued and won an apology On 8 January 1997, the Daily Telegraph published the headline, "The class we failed" concerning was the Year 12 class at Mount Druitt High School in outer Western Sydney in which no student scored a Tertiary Entrance Rank (TER) above 50 (the maximum possible mark is 100). Although the article made clear that the newspaper believed that the state had failed the students, many accused the Telegraph of branding the students themselves as failures and showing a full year photo identifying students.
  • 15. DEFAMATION • 3. HAS THERE BEEN PUBLICATION? • Must be communicated to a third party. • The medium doesn’t matter • Publication is where the material is RECEIVED (Dow Jones v. Gutnick 2002). • Anyone involved in publication can be sued • Anonymity online isn’t guaranteed • Actions can be brought up to 1 year from publication.
  • 16. DEFAMATION • RECAP ON DEFAMATION ESSENTIALS: • Has a reputation been lowered? • Is the plaintiff identified? • Has there been ‘publication’? • If all these are satisfied, then the court will discuss whether there is a defence.
  • 17. DEFAMATION DEFENCES • The defences split into two categories: • Those that are based on the material complained of being true (Truth and Honest Opinion) • Those that can succeed even if the material isn’t true (Absolute Privilege, Fair Report and Qualified Privilege, Innocent Dissemination, Triviality, Offer of Amends).
  • 18. DEFAMATION • TRUTH OR JUSTIFICATION DEFENCE • Truth doesn’t lower a reputation, it corrects it. • Material published must be “substantially true”. • However, truth needs to be proved – evidence is needed • Standard of proof - ‘on a balance of
  • 19. HONEST OPINION • Relates mainly to opinion, comment, reviews and criticism. • Opinion pages, editorials, sports, arts, film, music, restaurant reviews and also to letters and possibly weblogs and online comments. A newspaper in Sydney has been successfully sued by a restaurant group after one of their food critics wrote a scathing review of his experience in their establishment. The Australian courts have ordered John Fairfax Publications, the owners of The Sydney Morning Herald, to pay the owners of the Sydney restaurant, Coco Roco, on charges of defamation.
  • 20. HONEST OPINION • It must relate to a matter of public interest • The opinion must be based on “proper material” – either true facts or matters protected by privilege. • This “proper material” must be contained in the publication, or must be widely known. • The opinion must be “honestly held” – that is the action is not malicious
  • 21. FAIR REPORT • Protects “fair and accurate” reports of court and parliament • Also includes other meetings such as: proceedings of “a sport or recreation association”, a “trade association”, a “public meeting…. of shareholders” • or a “public meeting (with or without restriction on the people attending) held anywhere in Australia if the proceedings relate to a matter of public interest”.
  • 22. allows free communication in certain relationships without the risk of an action for defamation – generally where the person communicating the statement has a legal, moral or social duty to make it and the recipient has a corresponding interest in receiving it QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE Matters raised on the floor of the legislature (state & federal); OR statements made in the course of judicial proceedings made by parties, witness, legal representative, members of the jury, or by the judge attracts ABSOLUTE PRIVILEGE The defence of absolute privilege is attached to the occasion and not the content
  • 23. QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE • Allows things to be published that may be defamatory even if they can’t be proved • Must involve important, urgent matters and issues that should be brought to public attention • But the journalist must act “reasonably in the circumstances” – high standards and motives are required
  • 24. QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE • What does “reasonably in the circumstances” mean? • the extent to which the matter is of public interest and whether it needed to be published urgently • the extent to which the matter relates to the performance of public functions or activities of the plaintiff • how serious the defamatory imputation is
  • 25. QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE • the extent to which suspicion, allegation and proven fact is distinguished • the integrity of the sources • whether there was a reasonable attempt to get the plaintiff’s side of the story and publish this response • the steps taken to verify the information.
  • 26. POLITICAL QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE • Lange v. Australian Broadcasting Corporation 1997 – Common law case • Australian constitution contained an “implied guarantee” that people in Australia should be free to discuss matters of government and politics • But publication must be “reasonable in the circumstances” • Common Law Qualified Privilege – relates to personal disclosures
  • 27. INNOCENT DISSEMINATION • Gives protection to people who sell or distribute defamatory material but who couldn’t be expected to know that it was defamatory. • But would rarely be available to journalists, writers or publishers – except with live broadcasting “in which the broadcaster has no effective control over the person who makes the statements” “newsagent’s defence”
  • 28. INNOCENT DISSEMINATION • It typically would affect newsagents or libraries • Doesn’t affect Internet Service Providers • But controversial for weblogs and discussion forums • ISPs are deemed to have “no effective control” over websites • But the websites ARE deemed to have “effective control” over people who post on them
  • 29. TRIVIALITY • “It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the circumstances of publication were such that the plaintiff was unlikely to sustain any harm.” • Possible defence for comedy and satire – no- one is expected to take it seriously and so there is no consequent damage to reputation
  • 30. OFFER OF AMENDS DEFENCE • Without accepting liability, a publisher can make an “offer to make amends” • Needs to be made in writing “as soon as practicable” after the publisher became aware of the alleged defamation, • But must be within 28 days of a written complaint being made about the material which details the plaintiff’s concerns.
  • 31. OFFER OF AMENDS DEFENCE • It MUST contain an offer to publish a correction • It MUST contain an offer to pay any reasonable expenses incurred by the plaintiff (the costs of legal advice) • It MAY contain an offer of an apology • It MAY contain an offer to pay compensation for economic damages
  • 32. OFFER OF AMENDS DEFENCE • Can be a complete defence – even if refused by the plaintiff - as long as it is: • “reasonable in all the circumstances”, taking into account things like: • the prominence and speed of the correction or apology • the extent to which it reached the same audience or readership as the initial defamation.
  • 33. NON-DEFAMATION REMEDIES • Battle in negotiations over the new defamation laws about whether businesses could use defamation • The new Defamation Acts prevent “corporations” of more than 10 employees from suing. • It means businesses must look to other legal remedies when their business reputation is damaged.
  • 34. TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974 • Applies to “corporations” in the course of “trade and commerce” • S.52(1) deceptive and misleading conduct • S. 53 False or misleading representations • Can be sued by anyone who feels they were misled or deceived and by anyone who claims they’ve lost money as a result of being misled or deceived….
  • 35. TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974 • BUT - Section 65A Defence: • S.52 and 53 do not apply to “prescribed information providers” • Defined as “a person who carries on a business of providing information” • So news organisations – a bit like “innocent disseminators” – they can’t vouch for the information provided to them by interviewees and other sources
  • 36. Reading • Pearson: Journalist’s guide 4e Ch.8-9 • Pearson: Blogging & tweeting Ch.2 • Leiboff: Creative Practive Ch.6