1. District Performance Report
April 20, 2009
Dr . Pat rick Harrigan
Assistant Superintendent for Research,
Assessment and Special Services
Administrative Interns:
Kathy Levy
Valerie Geiler

2. District Profile 2007-2008
 Enrollment K-12: 10,142
 Free-Reduced Lunch: 8%
 Limited English Proficient: 2%
 Special Education: 13.5%
 Racial/Ethnic Origin
 American Indian/Alaskan Native: <1%
 Black or African American: 13%
 Hispanic or Latino: 5%
 Asian/Pacific Islander: 11%
 White: 71%
 Multiracial: <1%
 Annual Attendance Rate: 95%

3. District Accountability
 English-Language Arts: Good Standing
 Mathematics: Good Standing
 Science: Good Standing Highest
Status
 Graduation Rate: Good Standing Granted
 All Half Hollow Hills Schools achieved a
rating of Good Standing for accountability
purposes on Federal and State Measures.

4. State Assessments
 English Language Arts Grades 3-8 (4,841 Students Tested)
 Mathematics Grades 3-8 (4,853 Students Tested)
 Science grades 4 & 8 (1,247 Students Tested)
 English HS 2004 Cohort (836 Students Tested)
 Mathematics HS 2004 Cohort (836 Students Tested)

5. Total State Assessments…
12,613
Sunil John,
Lori VanStry,
MIS
State Assessments were prepared for
administered, taken, graded, and
reported to the Regional Information
Center for Accountability purposes.

6. English / Language-Arts
Accountability

7. Performance Index
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Al
lS
tu
de
nt
s
188
131
Di
sa
ble
d
146
AMO
Am
128
er
ica
n
Ind
i an
Bl
ac
k
177
Size
Group
129
Hi
As sp
an
ian ic
173
or
P
125
ac
ific
Is
la
nd
er
192
128
Lim W
ite h it
d e
190
En
ELA Grades 3-8 Performance Index
131
gli
sh
Ec Pr
on of
om ici
en
ica t
158
ll y
123
Di
sa
dv
an
tag
ed
165
128

8. ELA Grades 3-5 Performance Levels
School Performance AMO
P
e 194 190 196 197 195
r 200 181 182
f I
o n 150
r d 127 127 127 127 127 127 127
m e 100
a x
n
c
50
e
ll
o
lt
m
ll
k
rk
Hi
eg
Hi
bi
o
ua
Pa
an
er
ts
al
ut
nq
um
nd
gn
O
st
tn
Su
re
Va
Si
es
Pa
Fo
Ch
NYS Effective AMO (Effective Annual Measurable Objective).

9. Historical Comparison Grade-3
District Summary ELA Grade 3
80%
Percent of Total Population
Increased
60%
Level-4
40%
20%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Levels
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

10. ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-3
100% 93% 86% 95% 94%
90% 84%
80%
70%
60% 55% 53%
Percentage Level 3 and
50%
Above
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Small Group
Asian/Pacific White Lim English Eco
Student Groups Islander Disadvantaged
Grade 3

11. Historical Comparison Grade-4
80%
60%
Percent of Total Population
40%
20%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Levels
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

12. ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-4
100% 90% 88% 93%
90% 79% 81%
80% 69%
70% 55% 60%
60%
Percentage Level 3 and
50%
40%
Above
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Small Group
Asian/Pacific White Lim English Eco
Islander Disadvantaged
Student Groups
Grade 4

13. Historical Comparison Grade-5
80%
Percent of Total Population
60%
40%
20%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Levels
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

14. ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-5
100% 92% 86% 96% 93%
90% 75%
80% 74%
70%
60% 55% 50%
Percentage Level 3 and
50%
Above
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Small GroupAsian/Pacific White Lim English Eco
Student Groups Islander Disadvantaged
Grade 5

15. ELA Grades 6-8 Performance Levels
School Performance AMO
P 200 186 186
e
r
f I
150
o n
r d 130 130
m e
a x 100
n
c
e 50
Candlewood West Hollow
NYS Effective AMO (Effective Annual Measurable Objective).

16. Historical Comparison Grade-6
80%
60%
Percentage of Total Population
40%
20%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Levels
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

17. ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-6
100% 91%
86% 88%
90%
78%
80%
70%
56%
60% 52%
Percentage of Level 3 and Above
50% 41%
40%
30%
17%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Econ.
Islander Disadvantaged
Subgroups
Grade 6

18. Historical Comparison Grade-7
District Summary ELA 7
80%
Percentage of Total Population
Increased
60% Proficiency
40%
20%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Levels
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

19. ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-7
100% 91% 92% 93%
90% 85% 82%
79%
80%
70% 62%
60%
50% 43%
Percentage of Level 3 and
Above
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif ic White Limited English Econ.
Islander Disadvantaged
Subgroups
Grade 7

20. Historical Comparison Grade-8
80%
Pe rc e n t o f To t a l Po p u la t io n
60%
40%
20%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Le ve ls
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

21. ELA Subgroup Performance Grade-8
100% 91%
90% 81% 84%
80% 69%
70%
57% 54%
60%
50%
40%
Percentage of Level 3 and
23%
Above
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacif ic White Limited English Econ.
Islander Disadvantaged
Subgroups
Grade 8

22. ELA by Gender / Grade Level
100% 95% 93% 91% 94%
92% 92%
88% 89% 88%
83% 84%
Percentage Level 3 and Above
78%
80%
Female
60%
Male
40%
20%
0%

23. Secondary English Performance Index
Secondary English Performance Index
191 195 194
200
183
175 178
Performance Index
180
161 156 160
150 155 150 154 152
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
All Students American Hispanic White Economically
Good News Indian Disadvantaged
from SED

24. NY STATE REGENTS ENGLISH
97 96 95
100
90
80
67
70 60
59
60
Passing
50
Distinction
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06
85% or
Better

25. Mathematics
Accountability

26. Math 3-8 Performance Index
Math Performance Index - 2008
194 198 196
200 185 183 187
177
164
150
Performance Index
100 97 98 97 100 97
94 92
100
50
0
All Students Disabled American Indian Black Hispanic Asian or Pacific White Limited English Economically
Islander Proficient Disadvantaged

27. Math Performance Grades 3-5
School Performance AMO
P
e 199 197 200 199 199 192
200 189
r
f I
o n 150
r d
m e 100 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
a x
n
50
c
e
o
ll
lt
m
ll
k
rk
Hi
eg
Hi
bi
o
ua
Pa
an
er
ts
al
ut
nq
um
nd
gn
O
st
tn
Su
re
Va
Si
es
Pa
Fo
Ch

28. Historical Comparison Grade-3
G rade 3 Math
D IS TR IC T 05-06 D IS TR IC T 06-07 D IS TR IC T 07-08
60%
P erc entag e of T otal P opulation
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
L E VE L 1 L E VE L 2 L E VE L 3 L E VE L 4
L e ve l

29. Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-3
99% 100% 100% 99% 98%
100% 96% 94%
90%
87%
80%
70%
Percentage of Levels 3 and Above
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Economically
Islander Disadvantaged
Student Groups
Grade 3

30. Historical Comparison Grade-4
Grade 4 Math
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08
80%
Percentage of Total Population
60%
40%
20%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Level

31. Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-4
100% 96% 97% 97%
90% 86% 87%
81%
80% 73%
Percentage of Levels 3 and Above
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited Economically
Islander English Disadvantaged
Student Groups
Grade 4

32. Historical Comparison Grade-5
Grade 5 Math
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08
Level-4!
60%
Percentage of Total Population
40%
20%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Level

33. Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-5
97% 100% 98%
100% 93%
90% 86%
80% 77% 75%
70%
Percentage of Levels 3 and Above
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English Economically
Islander Disadvantaged
Student Groups
Grade 5

34. Math Performance Grades 6-8
School Performance AMO
193 192
P 200
e
r
f I
150
o n
r d
m e
a x 100 99 99
n
c
e 50
Candlewood West Hollow

35. Historical Comparison Grade-6
6th G rade Math
D IS T R IC T 05-06 D IS T R IC T 06-07 D IS T R IC T 07-08
60%
P erc entag e of T otal P opulation
40%
20%
0%
L E VE L 1 L E VE L 2 L E VE L 3 L E VE L 4

36. Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-6
100% 91% 98% 93%
90% 84%
80% 68%
70% 57%
60% 53%
50%
and Above
Percentage of Levels 3
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English
Islander Proficient
Student Groups
Grade 6

37. Historical Comparison Grade-7
Grade 7 Math Level-4!
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08
70%
60%
Percent of Total Population
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Levels

38. Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-7
100% 95% 89% 89% 100% 96%
90%
80% 71% 75%
70%
60%
50%
40%
and Above
30%
Percentage of Levels 3
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English
Islander Proficient
Student Groups
Grade 7

39. Historical Comparison Grade-8
Grade 8 Math
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08
60%
50%
Percentage of Total Population
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
Levels

40. Math Sub-Group Performance Grade-8
100% 92% 88% 97% 95%
90%
80%
75%
70% 60%
60%
50%
40%
Percentage of Levels 3 and
Above
30%
20%
10%
0%
All Students Disabilities Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific White Limited English
Islander Proficient
Student Groups
Grade 8

41. Math by Gender / Grade Level
99% 99%
100% 96% 95% 96% 97% 97%
94% 95%
93%
90% 90%
80%
Percentage Level 3 and Above
60%
Female
Male
40%
20%
0%
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Grade Level

42. Secondary Math Performance Index
Secondary Math Performance Index
192 194 195
200
183 180 178
180
155 155 149 154
160 150 148 146
144
Performance Index
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
All Students American Hispanic White Economically
Indian Disadvantaged

43. NY STATE REGENTS MATHEMATICS A
Passing Distinction
100 94 95 94
90
78
80
70
57
60 52
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

44. NY STATE REGENTS MATHEMATICS B
Passing Distinction
100 95 92 89
90
80
70
60 52
46 47
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

45. NY STATE REGENTS Integrated Algebra
First
Year
96
100
90
80
70 46
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Passing Distinction

46. Science
Accountability

47. Science Elementary and Intermediate Performance Index
200 196 188 192 198 198 184
178
150
Performance Index
100 100 100 100 100 100 100
100
50
0
All Students Disabled American Indian Black Hispanic Asian or Pacific White Limited English Economically
Islander Proficient Disadvantaged

48. Science Grade-4
School Performance AMO
P
e 200 197 200 200 200
190 191
r 200
f I
o n 150
r d
m e 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
a x
n
c
50
e
go
ll
m
lt
k
ll
rk
Hi
bi
o
Hi
se
ua
Pa
an
er
al
Ot
ut
nq
um
nd
gn
st
tn
Su
re
Va
Si
es
Pa
Fo
Ch

49. Science Grade-8
School Performance AMO
195 196
P 200
e
r
f I
150
o n
r d
m e
a x 100 100 100
n
c
e 50
Candlewood West Hollow

50. NY STATE REGENTS
LIVING ENVIRONMENT
Passing Distinction
98 97 96
100
90
80 69
70
60 50 49
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

51. NY STATE REGENTS
EARTH SCIENCE
Passing Distinction
100 93 90 92
90
80
70
58 55
60 49
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

52. NY STATE REGENTS
CHEMISTRY
Passing Distinction
100 91 91
87
90
80
70
60
50 45
40 32
27
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

53. NY STATE REGENTS
PHYSICS
Passing Distinction
97 98
100
90 83
80
70 59
56
60
50 45
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

54. Social Studies Results

55. NYS 5TH GRADE SOCIAL STUDIES
66% 66%
60% 55%
42%
PERCENTAGE
40% 32%
32%
20%
1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1%
0%
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
DISTRICT 05-06 DISTRICT 06-07 DISTRICT 07-08

56. NY STATE REGENTS GLOBAL
HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY
Passing Distinction
100 95
90 90
90
80
70 62
58
60 54
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

57. NY STATE REGENTS U.S. HISTORY
AND GOVERNMENT
Passing Distinction
98 97 95
100
90 81
76
80 71
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

58. Foreign Language Results

59. SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY
Passing
100 98 100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
French Italian Spanish

60. NY STATE REGENTS FRENCH
Passing Distinction
100 100 100
100 92
88 86
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

61. NY STATE REGENTS ITALIAN
Passing Distinction
100 100 100
100 88 86
90 80
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

62. NY STATE REGENTS SPANISH
Passing Distinction
99 99 99
100
90
74 76 74
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

63. Spanish Regents
Students with Disabilities
Passing Distinction
100
100 95 92
90
80
70
60 54
50 44
40 33
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

64. Graduation Rate
Accountability

65. Performance Index
A
0
20
40
60
80
100
ll
St
u de
nt
s
92
55
D
is
ab
le
d
70
A
m 55
er
ic
an
In
di
an
B
la
ck
86
55
H
is
A pa
ni
si
c
83
an
or
55
Pa
ci
fi c
Is
la
nd
er
96
55
Li W
m hi
ite te
94
graduates are not
d
E
ng
considered graduates
55
lis
h
IEP Diplomas and 5-year
Pr
Ec of
on ic
ie
om nt
ic
al
ly
D
is
ad
va
Graduation Rate by Percentage
nt
ag
ed
85
55

66. High School Completers Change in
formula
Regents Diploma Regents with Advanced Designation
94 97
100 93
90
80
66 66 67
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007-08 2006-07 2005-06

67. Post-Secondary Plans
94%
2 or 4 year
College
4-year College 2-year College Other Post-secondary
Military Employment Adult Services
Other Known Plans

68. The End!