SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 25
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
1st Steering Committee Meeting
Minsk, October 1-3, 2013
Results Monitoring at Program and
Country Levels
Overview
1. Results Monitoring & Challenges in
Phase I
2. Lessons Learned & Results Framework
for FLEG II Program
3. Reporting on Program & Country Level
Results Monitoring - FLEG I
• FLEG I Program monitored progress for
seven results areas
– Tracked results in each country and regionally
– Based on qualitative assessments by the country
teams and anecdotal evidence

• No results framework with measurable
indicators was developed
Challenges
• How to monitor the impacts of FLEG Program
interventions?
– With hundreds of activities implemented, there is anecdotal
evidence that the impact of FLEG I has been large
– No baseline survey conducted
– Progress towards higher level outcomes is difficult to judge
quantitatively

E.g., development of forestrelated educational materials in
Azerbaijan
(“Young Foresters‟ School”)
Results and achievements
FLEG Final Report (June 2013)
Lessons Learned
Robust and comprehensive results monitoring
is key to measuring impacts and judging higher
level impacts quantitatively
Measuring Results for FLEG II
• New Feature for Phase II:
Detailed Results Framework developed
• Indicators track progress at regional, national, and subnational level

• Responsibility for monitoring and data collection: PCTs
and/or PMT
Types of Indicators
• Project Development Objective (PDO)
Indicators
– 3 Core Sector Indicators (World Bank-wide)
– 4 Custom Indicators (FLEG II Program specific)

• Intermediate Results Indicators
– 7 Custom Indicators
(FLEG II Program specific)
Project Development Objective Indicators

Core Sector Indicators (CSI)
1. Reforms in forest policy, legislation or other
regulations supported
2. Government institutions provided with capacity
building to improve management of forest
resources
3. Forest users trained (by gender and ethnicity)
Reforms in forest policy, legislation or other
regulations supported

• Linked with PDO 1 (regional level): make progress
implementing the 2005 St. Petersburg FLEG Ministerial Declaration
in the participating countries and support the participating
countries commit to a time-bound action plan to ensure its
implementation and follow-up activities.

– Measures whether a project has supported forest
sector reforms (Yes/No)
• General ongoing policy dialogue with stakeholders
should not be included

– Baseline: „No‟
– Frequency: annual
Core Sector Indicator 1
Government institutions provided with capacity building to
improve management of forest resources

• Linked with PDO 1 (regional level)
– Covers capacity-building aimed at strengthening
forest administration institutions to deliver services to
the forest sector
• Refers to the number of national or sub-national
institutions that have received capacity building
• Targeted institutions may be outside of the forestry
sector

– Baseline: „zero‟
– Frequency: annual
Core Sector Indicator 2
Forest users trained
• Linked with PDO 1 (regional level)
• Refers to the number of forest users and
community members that have received
capacity building through training
– 2 Sub-indicators by:
• gender (female)
• ethnic minority/indigenous people

– Baseline: „zero‟
– Frequency: annual
Core Sector Indicator 3
Custom Indicators (PDO level)
Results Framework
Project Development Objective Indicators
Cumulative Target values

Indicator Name

Credible process
toward the
implementation of the
St. Petersburg
declaration launched
Understanding and
implementation of
FLEG principles by
forest practitioners and
other stakeholders
improved

Core

Unit of
Measure

Percentage

Responsibility
Data Source/
Baseline
End Frequency Methodology for Data
YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4
Collection
Target

0.00

Percentage x% Based
of
on survey
practitioners results

100

annual

Program
reports

PCT/PMT

TBD

Twice,
baseline
and final
surveys

Repeated
perception
surveys of key
decision
makers

PMT
Custom Indicators (PDO level)
Results Framework
Project Development Objective Indicators
Cumulative Target values

Indicator Name

Uptake of best practice
models on sustainable
forest management

Increased awareness
of decision makers of
modern technology
and information to
improve forest law
enforcement and
governance

Core

Unit of
Measure

Yes/No

Responsibility
Data Source/
Baseline
End Frequency Methodology for Data
YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4
Collection
Target

No

Percentage x% Based
of Decision on survey
Makers
results

Yes

annual

Program
reports

PCT/PMT

TBD

Twice,
baseline
and final
surveys

Repeated
perception
surveys of key
decision
makers

PMT
Intermediate Results Indicators

Tracking progress along the way…

…towards achieving the Project
Development Objectives
Intermediate Results Indicators

Results Framework
Intermediate Results Indicators
Cumulative Target values
Indicator Name

Core

Unit of
Baseline
Measure
YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4

Responsibility
Data Source/
End Frequency Methodology for Data
Collection
Target

Monitoring plan for
implementation of St.
Petersburg declaration
No
designed and regularly
updated in participating
countries

Number

0.00

7.00

annual

Program
reports

PCTs

Regional studies under
the framework of the
St. Petersburg
declaration undertaken
and disseminated

Number

0.00

TBD

annual

Program
reports

PCTs, PMT

No
Intermediate Results Indicators
Results Framework
Intermediate Results Indicators
Cumulative Target values
Indicator Name

Unit of
Core
Baseline
Measure
YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4

Responsibility
Data Source/
End Frequency Methodology for Data
Collection
Target

EU Member States‟
forest sector knowledge
is made available to
participating countries
and knowledge exchange No
between participating
countries and EU
Member States is
ongoing

Number

0.00

TBD
(7)

annual

Program
reports

PCTs, PMT

Sustainable forest
management and
improved forest
governance best practice
No
models developed, tested
and used for
demonstration purposes
by the Program

Number

0.00

TBD

annual

Program
reports

PCTs
Intermediate Results Indicators
Results Framework
Intermediate Results Indicators

Indicator Name

Cumulative Target values
Responsibility
Unit of
Data Source/
Core
Baseline
End Frequency Methodology for Data
Measure
YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4
Collection
Target

Modern technology trialed
and systems to improve
No
forest governance
developed by the Program

Awareness, ownership
and capacity of key
stakeholders enhanced

Media coverage of FLEG
issues has increased

TBD

annual

Program
reports

PCTs

x%
Percentag
Based
e of
No
on
stakeholde
survey
rs
results

TBD

Twice,
baseline
and final
surveys

Repeated
perception
surveys of key
decision
makers

PMT

No

7.00

annual

Repeated
media
monitoring

PCTs

Number

Number

0.00

0.00
Defining End Targets
• Action needed by PCTs, PMT to determine
end targets for remaining indicators based on
– proposed country and regional activities
– planned baseline survey

• Discussion at SC meeting

END TARGETS?
Reporting under FLEG II Program
• Three streams of reporting:
Program-level
Reporting

• Country-level (PCT to PMT)

• Organizational-level (WWF & ICUN to WB)
• Program-level (WB to EC)
• Internal Reporting by the World Bank
Reporting under FLEG II Program
Country-level

Organizational
Organizationallevel
level

Program-level

PCTs

IUCN &
WWF

WB

PMT

WB

EC

Internal WB Reporting
Country-level Reporting
• Narrative Progress Reports
Country-level

PCTs

PMT

– Quantitative (on the basis of the
Results Framework and indicators)
– “Results Stories”, quotes

• Frequency: semi-annual
– Reports for period July to December  due
January 31
– Reports for period January to June  due
July 31
– Final report needs to be prepared prior to
activity completion
Organizational-level Reporting
Organizational
level

• Organizational Reports
• Frequency: semi-annual
– Reports for period July to December 
due January 31
– Reports for period January to June  due
July 31

– Final narrative report due 6 month after end
date of activity implementation, but can be
prepared at the end of activity
implementation
In accordance with the
Grant Agreements
Program-level Reporting
• Narrative Progress Reports:
Program-level

• Summary and Context of Project
• Activities carried out during the reporting
period
• Difficulties encountered and measures
taken to overcome challenges
• Changes introduced in implementation,
including in the procurement plan

• Final Narrative Report
In accordance with the
Administration Agreement

• 6 months after end disbursement
date
Questions?

Thank you for your
attention!

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

ACT implementation strategy
ACT implementation strategyACT implementation strategy
ACT implementation strategyNAP Events
 
The NAP Agriculture Programme
The NAP Agriculture ProgrammeThe NAP Agriculture Programme
The NAP Agriculture ProgrammeFAO
 
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Five - Simultaneo...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Five - Simultaneo...Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Five - Simultaneo...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Five - Simultaneo...RBFHealth
 
Using Performance Data to Inform Budgeting at the Subnational Level: The Onta...
Using Performance Data to Inform Budgeting at the Subnational Level: The Onta...Using Performance Data to Inform Budgeting at the Subnational Level: The Onta...
Using Performance Data to Inform Budgeting at the Subnational Level: The Onta...OECD Governance
 
22.0a opm managing finance nap ws manila june 2017 part 1
22.0a opm managing finance nap ws manila june 2017 part 122.0a opm managing finance nap ws manila june 2017 part 1
22.0a opm managing finance nap ws manila june 2017 part 1NAP Events
 
Performance Budgeting in Austria by Monika Geppl and Stefan Kranabetter
Performance Budgeting in Austria by Monika Geppl and Stefan Kranabetter Performance Budgeting in Austria by Monika Geppl and Stefan Kranabetter
Performance Budgeting in Austria by Monika Geppl and Stefan Kranabetter OECD Governance
 
Spending reviews: recent PB reform Agenda in Korea -- Nowook Park, Korea
Spending reviews: recent PB reform Agenda in Korea -- Nowook Park, KoreaSpending reviews: recent PB reform Agenda in Korea -- Nowook Park, Korea
Spending reviews: recent PB reform Agenda in Korea -- Nowook Park, KoreaOECD Governance
 
Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...
Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...
Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...CIFOR-ICRAF
 
Better data for better policies for better indicators
Better data for better policies for better indicatorsBetter data for better policies for better indicators
Better data for better policies for better indicatorsOpenCoesione
 
Building an Evidence base: Introduction to Economics of Adaptation and Impact...
Building an Evidence base: Introduction to Economics of Adaptation and Impact...Building an Evidence base: Introduction to Economics of Adaptation and Impact...
Building an Evidence base: Introduction to Economics of Adaptation and Impact...FAO
 
Applying the tehnical guidelines
Applying the tehnical guidelinesApplying the tehnical guidelines
Applying the tehnical guidelinesNAP Events
 
Performance Budgeting: Lessons and Challenges from Korea by Jangro Lee
Performance Budgeting: Lessons and Challenges from Korea by Jangro LeePerformance Budgeting: Lessons and Challenges from Korea by Jangro Lee
Performance Budgeting: Lessons and Challenges from Korea by Jangro LeeOECD Governance
 
Implementing Spending Reviews: Dilemmas and Choices by Martin Kelleners
Implementing Spending Reviews: Dilemmas and Choices by Martin Kelleners Implementing Spending Reviews: Dilemmas and Choices by Martin Kelleners
Implementing Spending Reviews: Dilemmas and Choices by Martin Kelleners OECD Governance
 
Aligning the centre and line ministries - Mark Bussow, United States
Aligning the centre and line ministries - Mark Bussow, United StatesAligning the centre and line ministries - Mark Bussow, United States
Aligning the centre and line ministries - Mark Bussow, United StatesOECD Governance
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

NUP Process
NUP ProcessNUP Process
NUP Process
 
IFPRI - Results and Impact Management System (RIMS)
IFPRI - Results and Impact Management System (RIMS)IFPRI - Results and Impact Management System (RIMS)
IFPRI - Results and Impact Management System (RIMS)
 
ACT implementation strategy
ACT implementation strategyACT implementation strategy
ACT implementation strategy
 
The NAP Agriculture Programme
The NAP Agriculture ProgrammeThe NAP Agriculture Programme
The NAP Agriculture Programme
 
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Five - Simultaneo...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Five - Simultaneo...Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Five - Simultaneo...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Five - Simultaneo...
 
RIMS+ surveys: A tool for project design and evaluation
RIMS+ surveys: A tool for project design and evaluationRIMS+ surveys: A tool for project design and evaluation
RIMS+ surveys: A tool for project design and evaluation
 
Using Performance Data to Inform Budgeting at the Subnational Level: The Onta...
Using Performance Data to Inform Budgeting at the Subnational Level: The Onta...Using Performance Data to Inform Budgeting at the Subnational Level: The Onta...
Using Performance Data to Inform Budgeting at the Subnational Level: The Onta...
 
22.0a opm managing finance nap ws manila june 2017 part 1
22.0a opm managing finance nap ws manila june 2017 part 122.0a opm managing finance nap ws manila june 2017 part 1
22.0a opm managing finance nap ws manila june 2017 part 1
 
Participatory Monitoring A P S I D C
Participatory  Monitoring    A P S I D CParticipatory  Monitoring    A P S I D C
Participatory Monitoring A P S I D C
 
Performance Budgeting in Austria by Monika Geppl and Stefan Kranabetter
Performance Budgeting in Austria by Monika Geppl and Stefan Kranabetter Performance Budgeting in Austria by Monika Geppl and Stefan Kranabetter
Performance Budgeting in Austria by Monika Geppl and Stefan Kranabetter
 
Spending reviews: recent PB reform Agenda in Korea -- Nowook Park, Korea
Spending reviews: recent PB reform Agenda in Korea -- Nowook Park, KoreaSpending reviews: recent PB reform Agenda in Korea -- Nowook Park, Korea
Spending reviews: recent PB reform Agenda in Korea -- Nowook Park, Korea
 
Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...
Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...
Monitoring and Evaluation system for PFES: Key findings and policy recommenda...
 
Better data for better policies for better indicators
Better data for better policies for better indicatorsBetter data for better policies for better indicators
Better data for better policies for better indicators
 
Uganda - NAP Climate Change Adaptation Experiences
Uganda  - NAP Climate Change Adaptation ExperiencesUganda  - NAP Climate Change Adaptation Experiences
Uganda - NAP Climate Change Adaptation Experiences
 
Building an Evidence base: Introduction to Economics of Adaptation and Impact...
Building an Evidence base: Introduction to Economics of Adaptation and Impact...Building an Evidence base: Introduction to Economics of Adaptation and Impact...
Building an Evidence base: Introduction to Economics of Adaptation and Impact...
 
Introducing the National Adaptation Plans technical guidelines from the UNFCC...
Introducing the National Adaptation Plans technical guidelines from the UNFCC...Introducing the National Adaptation Plans technical guidelines from the UNFCC...
Introducing the National Adaptation Plans technical guidelines from the UNFCC...
 
Applying the tehnical guidelines
Applying the tehnical guidelinesApplying the tehnical guidelines
Applying the tehnical guidelines
 
Performance Budgeting: Lessons and Challenges from Korea by Jangro Lee
Performance Budgeting: Lessons and Challenges from Korea by Jangro LeePerformance Budgeting: Lessons and Challenges from Korea by Jangro Lee
Performance Budgeting: Lessons and Challenges from Korea by Jangro Lee
 
Implementing Spending Reviews: Dilemmas and Choices by Martin Kelleners
Implementing Spending Reviews: Dilemmas and Choices by Martin Kelleners Implementing Spending Reviews: Dilemmas and Choices by Martin Kelleners
Implementing Spending Reviews: Dilemmas and Choices by Martin Kelleners
 
Aligning the centre and line ministries - Mark Bussow, United States
Aligning the centre and line ministries - Mark Bussow, United StatesAligning the centre and line ministries - Mark Bussow, United States
Aligning the centre and line ministries - Mark Bussow, United States
 

Ähnlich wie Nina rinnerberger results monitoring and reporting

A mitchell results & lessons learned-sep29
A mitchell   results & lessons learned-sep29A mitchell   results & lessons learned-sep29
A mitchell results & lessons learned-sep29ENPI FLEG
 
Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira d...
Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira d...Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira d...
Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira d...NAP Global Network
 
Monitoring and Evaluation at the National Level | Anne Hammill, IISD
Monitoring and Evaluation at the National Level | Anne Hammill, IISDMonitoring and Evaluation at the National Level | Anne Hammill, IISD
Monitoring and Evaluation at the National Level | Anne Hammill, IISDNAP Global Network
 
Final regional workplan-with notes-oct1
Final regional workplan-with notes-oct1Final regional workplan-with notes-oct1
Final regional workplan-with notes-oct1ENPI FLEG
 
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
8-phe_monitoringggggggggggggggggggggggggAhmadMasoomJamshidi
 
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...
 PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ... PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...NAP Events
 
IWEco Webinar: Monitoring & Evaluation of Communication Campaigns – Dr. Pete...
IWEco Webinar:  Monitoring & Evaluation of Communication Campaigns – Dr. Pete...IWEco Webinar:  Monitoring & Evaluation of Communication Campaigns – Dr. Pete...
IWEco Webinar: Monitoring & Evaluation of Communication Campaigns – Dr. Pete...iweco-project
 
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBFMonitoring Framework for the KMGBF
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBFNikolayMehandzhiyski
 
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF.PDF
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF.PDFMonitoring Framework for the KMGBF.PDF
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF.PDFpensoftservices
 
Application package of National Control Board AIESEC MoC 14-15
Application package of National Control Board AIESEC MoC 14-15 Application package of National Control Board AIESEC MoC 14-15
Application package of National Control Board AIESEC MoC 14-15 Anastasiia Isakii
 
E-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversight
E-PASS Inception Project Management and OversightE-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversight
E-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversightepass2015
 
Monitoring the process using the PEG M&E Tool
Monitoring the process using the PEG M&E ToolMonitoring the process using the PEG M&E Tool
Monitoring the process using the PEG M&E ToolNAP Events
 
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation Systems
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation SystemsDeveloping National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation Systems
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation SystemsNAP Global Network
 
Communicating Results: What are results?
Communicating Results: What are results?Communicating Results: What are results?
Communicating Results: What are results?EEANorwayGrants
 

Ähnlich wie Nina rinnerberger results monitoring and reporting (20)

A mitchell results & lessons learned-sep29
A mitchell   results & lessons learned-sep29A mitchell   results & lessons learned-sep29
A mitchell results & lessons learned-sep29
 
Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira d...
Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira d...Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira d...
Monitoring and Evaluation of NAP: Brazil’s experience | Nelcilandia Pereira d...
 
Monitoring and Evaluation at the National Level | Anne Hammill, IISD
Monitoring and Evaluation at the National Level | Anne Hammill, IISDMonitoring and Evaluation at the National Level | Anne Hammill, IISD
Monitoring and Evaluation at the National Level | Anne Hammill, IISD
 
Final regional workplan-with notes-oct1
Final regional workplan-with notes-oct1Final regional workplan-with notes-oct1
Final regional workplan-with notes-oct1
 
8 phe monitoring
8 phe monitoring8 phe monitoring
8 phe monitoring
 
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
 
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...
 PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ... PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...
PEG M&E tool: a tool for monitoring and reviewing Progress, Effectiveness & ...
 
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Compendium of good practices by Tanja Tajnik
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Compendium of good practices by Tanja TajnikFourth IDMP CEE workshop: Compendium of good practices by Tanja Tajnik
Fourth IDMP CEE workshop: Compendium of good practices by Tanja Tajnik
 
4 compendium of good practices tajnik
4 compendium of good practices tajnik4 compendium of good practices tajnik
4 compendium of good practices tajnik
 
IWEco Webinar: Monitoring & Evaluation of Communication Campaigns – Dr. Pete...
IWEco Webinar:  Monitoring & Evaluation of Communication Campaigns – Dr. Pete...IWEco Webinar:  Monitoring & Evaluation of Communication Campaigns – Dr. Pete...
IWEco Webinar: Monitoring & Evaluation of Communication Campaigns – Dr. Pete...
 
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBFMonitoring Framework for the KMGBF
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF
 
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF.PDF
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF.PDFMonitoring Framework for the KMGBF.PDF
Monitoring Framework for the KMGBF.PDF
 
D2 pl-02-e-who gpw13 impact measurement
D2 pl-02-e-who gpw13 impact measurementD2 pl-02-e-who gpw13 impact measurement
D2 pl-02-e-who gpw13 impact measurement
 
1.3 contents and processes
1.3 contents and processes1.3 contents and processes
1.3 contents and processes
 
Application package of National Control Board AIESEC MoC 14-15
Application package of National Control Board AIESEC MoC 14-15 Application package of National Control Board AIESEC MoC 14-15
Application package of National Control Board AIESEC MoC 14-15
 
E-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversight
E-PASS Inception Project Management and OversightE-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversight
E-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversight
 
Monitoring the process using the PEG M&E Tool
Monitoring the process using the PEG M&E ToolMonitoring the process using the PEG M&E Tool
Monitoring the process using the PEG M&E Tool
 
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation Systems
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation SystemsDeveloping National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation Systems
Developing National Adaptation Monitoring and Evaluation Systems
 
Communicating Results: What are results?
Communicating Results: What are results?Communicating Results: What are results?
Communicating Results: What are results?
 
Webinar | Approaches to Progress Reporting on National Adaptation Plan (NAP) ...
Webinar | Approaches to Progress Reporting on National Adaptation Plan (NAP) ...Webinar | Approaches to Progress Reporting on National Adaptation Plan (NAP) ...
Webinar | Approaches to Progress Reporting on National Adaptation Plan (NAP) ...
 

Mehr von ENPI FLEG

4th Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda
4th Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda4th Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda
4th Steering Committee Meeting. AgendaENPI FLEG
 
Country presentation, Armenia
Country presentation, ArmeniaCountry presentation, Armenia
Country presentation, ArmeniaENPI FLEG
 
Country presentation, Azerbaijan
Country presentation, AzerbaijanCountry presentation, Azerbaijan
Country presentation, AzerbaijanENPI FLEG
 
Country presentation, Belarus
Country presentation, BelarusCountry presentation, Belarus
Country presentation, BelarusENPI FLEG
 
Country presentation, Georgia
Country presentation, GeorgiaCountry presentation, Georgia
Country presentation, GeorgiaENPI FLEG
 
Country presentation, Moldova
Country presentation, MoldovaCountry presentation, Moldova
Country presentation, MoldovaENPI FLEG
 
Country presentation, Russia
Country presentation, RussiaCountry presentation, Russia
Country presentation, RussiaENPI FLEG
 
Progress and activities since previous SC meeting (October 2015) and performa...
Progress and activities since previous SC meeting (October 2015) and performa...Progress and activities since previous SC meeting (October 2015) and performa...
Progress and activities since previous SC meeting (October 2015) and performa...ENPI FLEG
 
Study on Country Implementation of the St. Petersburg Declaration
Study on Country Implementation of the St. Petersburg DeclarationStudy on Country Implementation of the St. Petersburg Declaration
Study on Country Implementation of the St. Petersburg DeclarationENPI FLEG
 
Country presentation, Ukraine
Country presentation, UkraineCountry presentation, Ukraine
Country presentation, UkraineENPI FLEG
 
Удосконалення системи контролю за рухом деревини в Україні та пропозиції змін...
Удосконалення системи контролю за рухом деревини в Україні та пропозиції змін...Удосконалення системи контролю за рухом деревини в Україні та пропозиції змін...
Удосконалення системи контролю за рухом деревини в Україні та пропозиції змін...ENPI FLEG
 
Региональный бюллетень (Осень 2015)
Региональный бюллетень (Осень 2015)Региональный бюллетень (Осень 2015)
Региональный бюллетень (Осень 2015)ENPI FLEG
 
Проект моделі реформування і розвитку мисливського господарства України
Проект моделі реформування і розвитку мисливського господарства УкраїниПроект моделі реформування і розвитку мисливського господарства України
Проект моделі реформування і розвитку мисливського господарства УкраїниENPI FLEG
 
Regional newsletter (Autumn 2015)
Regional newsletter (Autumn 2015)Regional newsletter (Autumn 2015)
Regional newsletter (Autumn 2015)ENPI FLEG
 
Аналіз законодавчої бази і практики ведення мисливського господарства деяких ...
Аналіз законодавчої бази і практики ведення мисливського господарства деяких ...Аналіз законодавчої бази і практики ведення мисливського господарства деяких ...
Аналіз законодавчої бази і практики ведення мисливського господарства деяких ...ENPI FLEG
 
International experience in development of timber tracking systems
International experience in development of timber tracking systemsInternational experience in development of timber tracking systems
International experience in development of timber tracking systemsENPI FLEG
 
Analysis of legislation and practice of hunting in some EU countries
Analysis of legislation and practice of hunting in some EU countriesAnalysis of legislation and practice of hunting in some EU countries
Analysis of legislation and practice of hunting in some EU countriesENPI FLEG
 
Draft model of reformation and development of hunting sector in Ukraine
Draft model of reformation and development of hunting sector in UkraineDraft model of reformation and development of hunting sector in Ukraine
Draft model of reformation and development of hunting sector in UkraineENPI FLEG
 
Закордонний досвід налагодження систем контролю руху і стеження деревини
Закордонний досвід налагодження систем контролю руху і стеження деревиниЗакордонний досвід налагодження систем контролю руху і стеження деревини
Закордонний досвід налагодження систем контролю руху і стеження деревиниENPI FLEG
 
Пропозиції ключових законодавчих актів щодо охорони біорізноманіття в лісах а...
Пропозиції ключових законодавчих актів щодо охорони біорізноманіття в лісах а...Пропозиції ключових законодавчих актів щодо охорони біорізноманіття в лісах а...
Пропозиції ключових законодавчих актів щодо охорони біорізноманіття в лісах а...ENPI FLEG
 

Mehr von ENPI FLEG (20)

4th Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda
4th Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda4th Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda
4th Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda
 
Country presentation, Armenia
Country presentation, ArmeniaCountry presentation, Armenia
Country presentation, Armenia
 
Country presentation, Azerbaijan
Country presentation, AzerbaijanCountry presentation, Azerbaijan
Country presentation, Azerbaijan
 
Country presentation, Belarus
Country presentation, BelarusCountry presentation, Belarus
Country presentation, Belarus
 
Country presentation, Georgia
Country presentation, GeorgiaCountry presentation, Georgia
Country presentation, Georgia
 
Country presentation, Moldova
Country presentation, MoldovaCountry presentation, Moldova
Country presentation, Moldova
 
Country presentation, Russia
Country presentation, RussiaCountry presentation, Russia
Country presentation, Russia
 
Progress and activities since previous SC meeting (October 2015) and performa...
Progress and activities since previous SC meeting (October 2015) and performa...Progress and activities since previous SC meeting (October 2015) and performa...
Progress and activities since previous SC meeting (October 2015) and performa...
 
Study on Country Implementation of the St. Petersburg Declaration
Study on Country Implementation of the St. Petersburg DeclarationStudy on Country Implementation of the St. Petersburg Declaration
Study on Country Implementation of the St. Petersburg Declaration
 
Country presentation, Ukraine
Country presentation, UkraineCountry presentation, Ukraine
Country presentation, Ukraine
 
Удосконалення системи контролю за рухом деревини в Україні та пропозиції змін...
Удосконалення системи контролю за рухом деревини в Україні та пропозиції змін...Удосконалення системи контролю за рухом деревини в Україні та пропозиції змін...
Удосконалення системи контролю за рухом деревини в Україні та пропозиції змін...
 
Региональный бюллетень (Осень 2015)
Региональный бюллетень (Осень 2015)Региональный бюллетень (Осень 2015)
Региональный бюллетень (Осень 2015)
 
Проект моделі реформування і розвитку мисливського господарства України
Проект моделі реформування і розвитку мисливського господарства УкраїниПроект моделі реформування і розвитку мисливського господарства України
Проект моделі реформування і розвитку мисливського господарства України
 
Regional newsletter (Autumn 2015)
Regional newsletter (Autumn 2015)Regional newsletter (Autumn 2015)
Regional newsletter (Autumn 2015)
 
Аналіз законодавчої бази і практики ведення мисливського господарства деяких ...
Аналіз законодавчої бази і практики ведення мисливського господарства деяких ...Аналіз законодавчої бази і практики ведення мисливського господарства деяких ...
Аналіз законодавчої бази і практики ведення мисливського господарства деяких ...
 
International experience in development of timber tracking systems
International experience in development of timber tracking systemsInternational experience in development of timber tracking systems
International experience in development of timber tracking systems
 
Analysis of legislation and practice of hunting in some EU countries
Analysis of legislation and practice of hunting in some EU countriesAnalysis of legislation and practice of hunting in some EU countries
Analysis of legislation and practice of hunting in some EU countries
 
Draft model of reformation and development of hunting sector in Ukraine
Draft model of reformation and development of hunting sector in UkraineDraft model of reformation and development of hunting sector in Ukraine
Draft model of reformation and development of hunting sector in Ukraine
 
Закордонний досвід налагодження систем контролю руху і стеження деревини
Закордонний досвід налагодження систем контролю руху і стеження деревиниЗакордонний досвід налагодження систем контролю руху і стеження деревини
Закордонний досвід налагодження систем контролю руху і стеження деревини
 
Пропозиції ключових законодавчих актів щодо охорони біорізноманіття в лісах а...
Пропозиції ключових законодавчих актів щодо охорони біорізноманіття в лісах а...Пропозиції ключових законодавчих актів щодо охорони біорізноманіття в лісах а...
Пропозиції ключових законодавчих актів щодо охорони біорізноманіття в лісах а...
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Things you didn't know you can use in your Salesforce
Things you didn't know you can use in your SalesforceThings you didn't know you can use in your Salesforce
Things you didn't know you can use in your SalesforceMartin Humpolec
 
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...Aggregage
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8DianaGray10
 
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...DianaGray10
 
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsComputer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsSeth Reyes
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxGDSC PJATK
 
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a WebsiteCOMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Websitedgelyza
 
Do we need a new standard for visualizing the invisible?
Do we need a new standard for visualizing the invisible?Do we need a new standard for visualizing the invisible?
Do we need a new standard for visualizing the invisible?SANGHEE SHIN
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding TeamAdam Moalla
 
GenAI and AI GCC State of AI_Object Automation Inc
GenAI and AI GCC State of AI_Object Automation IncGenAI and AI GCC State of AI_Object Automation Inc
GenAI and AI GCC State of AI_Object Automation IncObject Automation
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPathCommunity
 
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesLinked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesDavid Newbury
 
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesAI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesMd Hossain Ali
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAshyamraj55
 
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationUsing IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationIES VE
 
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLRuncy Oommen
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1DianaGray10
 
RAG Patterns and Vector Search in Generative AI
RAG Patterns and Vector Search in Generative AIRAG Patterns and Vector Search in Generative AI
RAG Patterns and Vector Search in Generative AIUdaiappa Ramachandran
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopBachir Benyammi
 
Cloud Revolution: Exploring the New Wave of Serverless Spatial Data
Cloud Revolution: Exploring the New Wave of Serverless Spatial DataCloud Revolution: Exploring the New Wave of Serverless Spatial Data
Cloud Revolution: Exploring the New Wave of Serverless Spatial DataSafe Software
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Things you didn't know you can use in your Salesforce
Things you didn't know you can use in your SalesforceThings you didn't know you can use in your Salesforce
Things you didn't know you can use in your Salesforce
 
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
 
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
 
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsComputer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
 
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a WebsiteCOMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
 
Do we need a new standard for visualizing the invisible?
Do we need a new standard for visualizing the invisible?Do we need a new standard for visualizing the invisible?
Do we need a new standard for visualizing the invisible?
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
 
GenAI and AI GCC State of AI_Object Automation Inc
GenAI and AI GCC State of AI_Object Automation IncGenAI and AI GCC State of AI_Object Automation Inc
GenAI and AI GCC State of AI_Object Automation Inc
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
 
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesLinked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
 
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesAI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
 
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationUsing IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
 
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
 
RAG Patterns and Vector Search in Generative AI
RAG Patterns and Vector Search in Generative AIRAG Patterns and Vector Search in Generative AI
RAG Patterns and Vector Search in Generative AI
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
 
Cloud Revolution: Exploring the New Wave of Serverless Spatial Data
Cloud Revolution: Exploring the New Wave of Serverless Spatial DataCloud Revolution: Exploring the New Wave of Serverless Spatial Data
Cloud Revolution: Exploring the New Wave of Serverless Spatial Data
 

Nina rinnerberger results monitoring and reporting

  • 1. 1st Steering Committee Meeting Minsk, October 1-3, 2013 Results Monitoring at Program and Country Levels
  • 2. Overview 1. Results Monitoring & Challenges in Phase I 2. Lessons Learned & Results Framework for FLEG II Program 3. Reporting on Program & Country Level
  • 3. Results Monitoring - FLEG I • FLEG I Program monitored progress for seven results areas – Tracked results in each country and regionally – Based on qualitative assessments by the country teams and anecdotal evidence • No results framework with measurable indicators was developed
  • 4. Challenges • How to monitor the impacts of FLEG Program interventions? – With hundreds of activities implemented, there is anecdotal evidence that the impact of FLEG I has been large – No baseline survey conducted – Progress towards higher level outcomes is difficult to judge quantitatively E.g., development of forestrelated educational materials in Azerbaijan (“Young Foresters‟ School”)
  • 5. Results and achievements FLEG Final Report (June 2013)
  • 6. Lessons Learned Robust and comprehensive results monitoring is key to measuring impacts and judging higher level impacts quantitatively
  • 7. Measuring Results for FLEG II • New Feature for Phase II: Detailed Results Framework developed • Indicators track progress at regional, national, and subnational level • Responsibility for monitoring and data collection: PCTs and/or PMT
  • 8. Types of Indicators • Project Development Objective (PDO) Indicators – 3 Core Sector Indicators (World Bank-wide) – 4 Custom Indicators (FLEG II Program specific) • Intermediate Results Indicators – 7 Custom Indicators (FLEG II Program specific)
  • 9. Project Development Objective Indicators Core Sector Indicators (CSI) 1. Reforms in forest policy, legislation or other regulations supported 2. Government institutions provided with capacity building to improve management of forest resources 3. Forest users trained (by gender and ethnicity)
  • 10. Reforms in forest policy, legislation or other regulations supported • Linked with PDO 1 (regional level): make progress implementing the 2005 St. Petersburg FLEG Ministerial Declaration in the participating countries and support the participating countries commit to a time-bound action plan to ensure its implementation and follow-up activities. – Measures whether a project has supported forest sector reforms (Yes/No) • General ongoing policy dialogue with stakeholders should not be included – Baseline: „No‟ – Frequency: annual Core Sector Indicator 1
  • 11. Government institutions provided with capacity building to improve management of forest resources • Linked with PDO 1 (regional level) – Covers capacity-building aimed at strengthening forest administration institutions to deliver services to the forest sector • Refers to the number of national or sub-national institutions that have received capacity building • Targeted institutions may be outside of the forestry sector – Baseline: „zero‟ – Frequency: annual Core Sector Indicator 2
  • 12. Forest users trained • Linked with PDO 1 (regional level) • Refers to the number of forest users and community members that have received capacity building through training – 2 Sub-indicators by: • gender (female) • ethnic minority/indigenous people – Baseline: „zero‟ – Frequency: annual Core Sector Indicator 3
  • 13. Custom Indicators (PDO level) Results Framework Project Development Objective Indicators Cumulative Target values Indicator Name Credible process toward the implementation of the St. Petersburg declaration launched Understanding and implementation of FLEG principles by forest practitioners and other stakeholders improved Core Unit of Measure Percentage Responsibility Data Source/ Baseline End Frequency Methodology for Data YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 Collection Target 0.00 Percentage x% Based of on survey practitioners results 100 annual Program reports PCT/PMT TBD Twice, baseline and final surveys Repeated perception surveys of key decision makers PMT
  • 14. Custom Indicators (PDO level) Results Framework Project Development Objective Indicators Cumulative Target values Indicator Name Uptake of best practice models on sustainable forest management Increased awareness of decision makers of modern technology and information to improve forest law enforcement and governance Core Unit of Measure Yes/No Responsibility Data Source/ Baseline End Frequency Methodology for Data YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 Collection Target No Percentage x% Based of Decision on survey Makers results Yes annual Program reports PCT/PMT TBD Twice, baseline and final surveys Repeated perception surveys of key decision makers PMT
  • 15. Intermediate Results Indicators Tracking progress along the way… …towards achieving the Project Development Objectives
  • 16. Intermediate Results Indicators Results Framework Intermediate Results Indicators Cumulative Target values Indicator Name Core Unit of Baseline Measure YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 Responsibility Data Source/ End Frequency Methodology for Data Collection Target Monitoring plan for implementation of St. Petersburg declaration No designed and regularly updated in participating countries Number 0.00 7.00 annual Program reports PCTs Regional studies under the framework of the St. Petersburg declaration undertaken and disseminated Number 0.00 TBD annual Program reports PCTs, PMT No
  • 17. Intermediate Results Indicators Results Framework Intermediate Results Indicators Cumulative Target values Indicator Name Unit of Core Baseline Measure YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 Responsibility Data Source/ End Frequency Methodology for Data Collection Target EU Member States‟ forest sector knowledge is made available to participating countries and knowledge exchange No between participating countries and EU Member States is ongoing Number 0.00 TBD (7) annual Program reports PCTs, PMT Sustainable forest management and improved forest governance best practice No models developed, tested and used for demonstration purposes by the Program Number 0.00 TBD annual Program reports PCTs
  • 18. Intermediate Results Indicators Results Framework Intermediate Results Indicators Indicator Name Cumulative Target values Responsibility Unit of Data Source/ Core Baseline End Frequency Methodology for Data Measure YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 Collection Target Modern technology trialed and systems to improve No forest governance developed by the Program Awareness, ownership and capacity of key stakeholders enhanced Media coverage of FLEG issues has increased TBD annual Program reports PCTs x% Percentag Based e of No on stakeholde survey rs results TBD Twice, baseline and final surveys Repeated perception surveys of key decision makers PMT No 7.00 annual Repeated media monitoring PCTs Number Number 0.00 0.00
  • 19. Defining End Targets • Action needed by PCTs, PMT to determine end targets for remaining indicators based on – proposed country and regional activities – planned baseline survey • Discussion at SC meeting END TARGETS?
  • 20. Reporting under FLEG II Program • Three streams of reporting: Program-level Reporting • Country-level (PCT to PMT) • Organizational-level (WWF & ICUN to WB) • Program-level (WB to EC) • Internal Reporting by the World Bank
  • 21. Reporting under FLEG II Program Country-level Organizational Organizationallevel level Program-level PCTs IUCN & WWF WB PMT WB EC Internal WB Reporting
  • 22. Country-level Reporting • Narrative Progress Reports Country-level PCTs PMT – Quantitative (on the basis of the Results Framework and indicators) – “Results Stories”, quotes • Frequency: semi-annual – Reports for period July to December  due January 31 – Reports for period January to June  due July 31 – Final report needs to be prepared prior to activity completion
  • 23. Organizational-level Reporting Organizational level • Organizational Reports • Frequency: semi-annual – Reports for period July to December  due January 31 – Reports for period January to June  due July 31 – Final narrative report due 6 month after end date of activity implementation, but can be prepared at the end of activity implementation In accordance with the Grant Agreements
  • 24. Program-level Reporting • Narrative Progress Reports: Program-level • Summary and Context of Project • Activities carried out during the reporting period • Difficulties encountered and measures taken to overcome challenges • Changes introduced in implementation, including in the procurement plan • Final Narrative Report In accordance with the Administration Agreement • 6 months after end disbursement date
  • 25. Questions? Thank you for your attention!

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Results monitoring under the first FLEG Program focused on seven results areas, including: 1 – increased awareness and commitment of key stakeholders on FLEG2 – effective national and regional FLEG action processes in place3 – increased national ownership and capacity4 – improved regional and sub-regional collaboration and knowledge sharing5 – effective engagement of key trading partners6 – continuation of the formal official Europe-North Asia FLEG process7 – sustainable forest management practices implementedResults areas were monitored in country and regional programs based on qualitative assessments by the country teams and percentage completion of activities, as well as their success and outcome. Narrative reports were prepared to report on progress to the PMT. However, there was no actual results framework with measurable indicators.
  2. While there were hundreds of activities with real impact, and while the impact of the Program has been large, this is based on anecdotal evidence. Overall, progress towards higher level outcomes is difficult to judge quantitatively. Example from Azerbaijan: The Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources, as the main partner, was intensively involved during the development of forest-related educational materials (e.g. teacher support pack “Young Foresters’ School”) and other Program activities including trainings/seminars and studies. FLEG issues are a complex we of different causes and effects: e.g. addressing the issue of illegal logging simply by increasing enforcement or penalties (without addressing the root causes and underlying culture), it is likely that the impact on governance will in fact be worse than doing nothing. Because the drivers for illegal logging (such as poverty, lack of legal or alternative supply) will still be there creating the demand and so, increasing enforcement may simply create opportunities for corruption and collusion. Because of this complexity, it is difficult to select appropriate indicators.
  3. Lessons LearnedNevertheless many achievements, which are summarized in the Final Report of the Program.
  4. What is different in FLEG II? We now have a detailed Results Framework with indicators to track progress at the different levels – regional, national, and sub-national. Some of the indicators are directly linked to the PDO.
  5. What is different in FLEG II? We now have a detailed Results Framework with indicators to track progress at the different levels – regional, national, and sub-national. Some of the indicators are directly linked to the PDO.
  6. There are two sets of indictors: one on the PDO level and then Intermediate results indicatorsFirst set of indicators, i.e. PDO-level indicators include: core indicators developed Bank-wide and custom indicators
  7. There are two sets of indictors: one on the PDO level and then Intermediate results indicatorsFirst set of indicators, i.e. PDO-level indicators include: core indicators developed Bank-wide and custom indicators.Results framework at the bottom will be used for reporting. Baseline for CSI 1 is No, Target values are tracked each year, annually. End target is yes.
  8. CSI #1 – linked with PDO one Some Bank projects aim at supporting reforms of forest policies, forest products trade policies as well as legal and institutional frameworks in client countries. In some federal states, the Bank support to reforms may be delivered at lower, sub-sovereign level12. This indicator measures whether a project has supported forest sector reforms. This includes support to revised policies or legal and institutional reforms that have been adopted by the client. It also includes well-defined, time-bound phased action plans that have been launched with the objective of achieving such forest sector reforms. The processes have to be formalized through documented official endorsement. Adoption of reforms can be indicated by approving new legislation or by issuing implementing regulations or decrees. They also have to inclusive and consultative.13
  9. CSI #2:This indicator covers capacity-building projects aiming at strengthening forest administration institutions and other institutions to deliver services to the forest sector. The targeted institutions may also be outside the forest sector (sensu stricto) and they may cover other public institutions or service delivery and law enforcement organizations in the rural landscape. This could include support to the implementation of trade policies during Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) implementation. The baseline value for this indicator is expected to be zero. Guidance on “Government institutions provided with capacity building support to improve management of forest resources”: This refers to the number of national or sub-national institutions (e.g. forest or environmental departments at national, state or province-level) that have received capacity building as a result of the project. This includes support to training of officials, support to operations, information management or investments in physical infrastructure or other facilities. If sub-sovereign units14 are counted separately, it is essential that they have “independence” of each other. As a comparison, if forest policy implementation is piloted in two districts, but they are effectively field organizations for one agency or department, this counts as one institution supported.
  10. CSI #3: Important indicator because one of the ways to improve forest governance and forest management is through capacity building and this indicator also will be reported at the corporate WB-level. Results from FLEG II will feed into/contribute to Bank-wide monitoring of impacts of projects. Often World Bank projects do not directly invest in the management of specific land or forest areas. Instead, these capacity-building projects aim at strengthening communities to improve forest management and their livelihood. The expected baseline value for this indicator is zero. Data must be disaggregated by ethnicity10 and gender. Guidance on “Forest users trained (number)”: This refers to the number of forest users and community members that have received capacity building through training as a result of the project. The concept may need to be adjusted according to local practice or national legislation. Training needs to be targeted to specific audience. General media or public awareness campaigns are not included. When estimating the number of people trained, it is essential to avoid double counting if same individuals have participated in a series of training events.
  11. Custom indicators (4 in total) were developed to correspond to the three specific PDOs.
  12. Custom indicators (4 in total) were developed to correspond to the three specific PDOs.
  13. There are two sets of indictors: one on the PDO level and then Intermediate results indicatorsFirst set of indicators, i.e. PDO-level indicators include: core indicators developed Bank-wide and custom indicators.Results framework at the bottom will be used for reporting. Baseline for CSI 1 is No, Target values are tracked each year, annually. End target is yes.
  14. Second set of indicators are intermediate results indicators: these include only customized indicators specific to the FLEG II Program (7 in total).
  15. Second set of indicators are intermediate results indicators: these include only customized indicators specific to the FLEG II Program (7 in total).
  16. Second set of indicators are intermediate results indicators: these include only customized indicators specific to the FLEG II Program (7 in total).Each country as part of their public awareness strategy will need to monitor media coverage of forestry and FLEG issues. A simple count of the number of media articles etc. can demonstrate how FLEG and Forestry coverage is rising.
  17. Missing indicators: 2 PDO level and 5 intermediate results indicators
  18. Content of Narrative Progress Reports same as that required for reporting to EC:Summary and Context of ProjectActivities carried out during the reporting periodBoth quantitative and narrative End date for activity implementation: IUCN and WWF: December 31, 2016 – final report due June 30, 2017 (PCTs)WB: February 28, 2017 – final report due August 31, 2017 (WB PCT) End disbursement date: June 30, 2017.
  19. Content of Narrative Progress Reports same as that required for reporting to EC:Summary and Context of ProjectActivities carried out during the reporting periodBoth quantitative and narrative End date for activity implementation: IUCN and WWF: December 31, 2016 – final report due June 30, 2017 (PCTs)WB: February 28, 2017 – final report due August 31, 2017 (WB PCT) End disbursement date: June 30, 2017.
  20. Narrative reports to accompany each funding request.Reports are to provide for comparison of the objectives of the Trust Fund, the results expected and obtained and the budget details for the ProjectFinal Narrative Report (due December 31, 2017)