Part 2 Protection: The Five Pillars Of Disaster Resilience
•Als PPTX, PDF herunterladen•
2 gefällt mir•1,192 views
Disaster resilience is a failed policy without the adoption and implementation of five integrated policies (i.e., The Five Pillars of Disaster Resilience) With Today’s Books of Knowledge, Innovative Capacity Building to Protect Important Buildings and Basic, essential, and Critical, Infrastructure is possible. Presentation courtesy of Dr. Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (20)
Ähnlich wie Part 2 Protection: The Five Pillars Of Disaster Resilience
Ähnlich wie Part 2 Protection: The Five Pillars Of Disaster Resilience (20)
Mehr von Professor Eric K. Noji, M.D., MPH, DTMH(Lon), FRCP(UK)hon
Mehr von Professor Eric K. Noji, M.D., MPH, DTMH(Lon), FRCP(UK)hon (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Part 2 Protection: The Five Pillars Of Disaster Resilience
- 1. THE FIVE PILLARS OF DISASTER RESILIENCE Part 2: Protection
- 2. DISASTER RESILIENCE IS A FAILED POLICY WITHOUT THE ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FIVE INTEGRATED POLICIES (i.e., The Five Pillars of Disaster Resilience)
- 3. •MONITORING •HAZARD MAPS •INVENTORY •VULNERABILITY •LOCATIONR DATA BASES AND INFORMATION ACCEPTABLE RISK RISK UNACCEPTABLE RISK YOUR BOOKS OF KNOWLEDGE NATION 5 PILLARS OF DISASTER RESILIENCE HAZARDS: GROUND SHAKING GROUND FAILURE SURFACE FAULTING TECTONIC DEFORMATION TSUNAMI RUN UP AFTERSHOCKS •PREPAREDNESS •PROTECTION •EARLY WARNING •EM RESPONSE •RECOVERY
- 4. PROTECTION OF IMPORTANT BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE IS AN ESSENTIAL PILLAR OF DISASTER RESILIENCE
- 5. THE GOAL DISASTER RESILIENCE: DEMANDS ON COMMUNITY CAPABILITIES OF COMMUNITY
- 6. REALITY LACK OF DISASTER RESILIENCE INSUFFICIENT PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY BLDGS. & INFRASTRUCTURE UNANTICIPATED DEMANDS ON COMMUNITY
- 7. WHAT IS PROTECTION? (Protection is a mandated state of robustness, strength, and ductility for important buildings and essential - critical infrastructure to prevent loss of function when a natural hazard ocurs
- 8. THE STATE-OF-PROTECTION IN A COMMUNITY INCREASES AS A COMMUNITY’S CAPABILITY TO ANTICIPATE WHAT WILL HAPPEN INCREASES
- 9. WHAT IS PREPAREDNESS? (Preparedness is a state of readiness on individual, urban, sub-regional, and national scales that is sufficient to keep the disaster agents of a natural hazard from causing a disaster
- 10. THE STATE-OF-READINESS IN A COMMUNITY INCREASES AS A COMMUNITY’S CAPABILITY TO ANTICIPATE WHAT WILL HAPPEN INCREASES
- 11. ANY COMMUNITY CAN INCREASE ITS STATE-OFPROTECTION AGAINST THE POTENTIAL DISASTER AGENTS OF ANY NATURAL HAZARD
- 12. ALL “PROTECTION ACTIVITIES” RELY ON CAPABILITY TO ANTICIPATE • HAZARD AND RISK ZONATION (INUNDATION, GROUND SHAKING, AND HIGH-VELOCITY WIND FIELDS) • URBAN PLANNING (AVOIDANCE) • CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATING BUILDING CODES AND LIFELINE STANDARDS • SITE-SPECIFIC DESIGN
- 13. ALL “PROTECTION ACTIVITIES” RELY ON CAPABILITY TO ANTICIPATE • ACTIVE AND PASSIVE ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICES (e.g., BASE ISOLATION) • PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR BASIC, ESSENTIAL, AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE) …
- 14. WHAT NEEDS TO BE ANTICIPATED? • THE NATURAL HAZARD (S) THAT IS/ARE MOST LIKELY TO OCCUR? • WHERE AND WHEN WILL IT/THEY OCCUR? • HOW STRONG WILL THE POTENTIAL DISASTER AGENTS OF EACH HAZARD BE?
- 15. WHAT NEEDS TO BE ANTICIPATED (Continued)? • WHAT KINDS OF BUILDINGS ARE AT RISK? • WHAT KINDS OF BASIC, ESSENTIAL, AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ARE AT RISK? • WHAT ARE THEIR PHYSICAL VULNERABILITIES
- 16. WHAT NEEDS TO BE ANTICIPATED (Continued)? • WHAT ARE THE LIKELY SOCIAL VULNERABILITIES • WHAT IS THE LIKELY DAMAGE DISTRIBUTION? • WHAT ARE THE LIKELY CASUALTIES, SOCIOECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
- 17. BUILDINGS NEEDING PROTECTION? • • • • • • • HIGH-RISES SCHOOLS HOSPITALS MILITARY INSTALLATIONS THE CAPITOL THE LEGISLATURE TH PRESIDENTIAL PALACE
- 18. INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDING PROTECTION • UTILITY SYSTEMS (GAS, POWER, WATER) • SEWAGE SYSTEMS • PIPELINES • TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES, TRANSIT, AIRPORTS, …)
- 19. INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDING PROTECTEION • • • • • COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LEVEES AND DAMS POWER PLANTS NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS HAZ MAT STORAGE TANKS
- 20. POTENTIAL DISASTER AGENTS TO PROTECT AGAINST • • • • • • INUNDATION STRONG WIND FIELD STRONG GROUND SHAKING LIQUEFACTION LANDSLIDES FIRE
- 21. EXAMPLE 1: A NEED FOR PROTECTION • CHINA EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 22. EXAMPLE 2: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • EGYPT ASWAN HIGH DAM: PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 23. EXAMPLE 3: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • ALGERIA (ALGIERS, A CAPITAL CITY): PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 24. EXAMPLE 3: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • ALGERIA (BOUMEDES) AFTER EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 25. EXAMPLE 4: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • ITALY (IRPINIA) AFTER EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 26. EXAMPLE 5: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • OKLAHOMA, USA HOSPITAL AFTER TORNADO: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 27. EXAMPLE 6: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • JAPAN ELEVATED EXPRESSWAY AFTER EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 28. EXAMPLE 7: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • CALIFORNIA OAKLAND BAY BRIDGE AFTER EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 29. EXAMPLE 8: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • SAN FRANCISCO CITY HALL (BASE ISOLATION): PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 30. EXAMPLE 9: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • ARIZONA, USA AQUEDUCT: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 31. EXAMPLE 10: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • SAN FRANCISCO INT’L AIRPORT (BASE ISOLATION): PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 32. EXAMPLE 11: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • CHILE HIGHWAY SYSTEM: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 33. EXAMPLE 12: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • NEW ORLEANS AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 34. EXAMPLE 13: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • CHILE INUNDATION: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 35. EXAMPLE 14: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • CHINA (YA’AN CITY) AFTER EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 36. EXAMPLE 15: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • GULF OF MEXICO OIL RIG: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 37. EXAMPLE 16: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • PAKISTAN COLLAPSED BUILDINGS AFTER EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 38. EXAMPLE 17: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • HAITI PRESIDENTIAL PALACE AFTER EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 39. EXAMPLE 18: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • JAPAN FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 40. EXAMPLE 19: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • MEXICO (MEXICO CITY AND “POPO): PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 41. EXAMPLE 20: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION”E • PERU BRIDGE AFTER LANDSLIDE): PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 42. EXAMPLE 21: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • USA INTERSTATE HWY 44 INUNDATED: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 43. EXAMPLE 22: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • JAPAN ELEVATED EXPRESSWAY AFTER EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 44. EXAMPLE 23: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • CHINA BEIJING (CAPITAL CITY) AFTER FLOOD: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 45. EXAMPLE 24: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION”E • PERU BRIDGE AFTER LANDSLIDE): PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 46. EXAMPLE 25: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • USA INTERSTATE HWY 44 INUNDATED: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 47. EXAMPLE 26: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • CHINA THREE GORGES DAM: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 48. EXAMPLE 27: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • ALASKA USA SCHOOL: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 49. EXAMPLE 28: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • TENNESSEE (USA) ELEVATED RAILROAD BRIDGE DURING A FLOOD: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 50. EXAMPLE 29: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • SRI LANKA AFTER TSUNAMI WAVE RUN UP: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 51. EXAMPLE 30: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • RUSSUA WILDFIRE NEAR THE KREMLIN: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 52. EXAMPLE 31: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • AUSTRALIA (QUEENSLAND) A FLOOD: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 53. EXAMPLE 32: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • AMERICAN SAMOA TSUNAMI WAVE RUN UP: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 54. EXAMPLE 33: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • TRINIDADTOBAGO FLOOD: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 55. EXAMPLE 34: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • JAPAN TSUNAMI WAVE RUN UP: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 56. EXAMPLE 35: A NEED FOR “PROTECTION” • RUSSIA EARTHQUAKE: PROPER PRIOR PROTECTION PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE
- 57. CONCLUSION With Today’s Books of Knowledge, Innovative Capacity Building to Protect Important Buildings and Basic, essential, and Critical, Infrastructure is possible.