Transaction Management in Database Management System
Â
ACNP/NILDE Conferenze, Bari May 22th-23th 2012
1. ACNP/NILDE Conferenze, Bari May 22th-23th 2012
Using a dumb identifier
to do smart things
Peter Burnhill
Director, EDINA, University of
Edinburgh, UK
2. Overview for talk
0. Introduction
â EDINA, JISC national datacentre at University of Edinburgh
⢠Opportunity to share a digital library journey
â and say hello to old friends
⢠SUNCAT: union catalogue of serials in UK (& OpenURL Router)
⢠Keepers Registry: e-journal preservation (& ISSN-L)
â Digitised journals & print archiving
⢠Entitlement Registry & KnowledgeBase (KB+)
⢠Forward Look
3. research, learning & teaching in UK universities & colleges
Formed acting as two platforms for network-level services
NDCs in 1995/96, based upon
Edinburghof JISC Integrated Information Environment
as part
University Data Library (1983/4)
National Data Centres
Digital Content Tools &
& Metadata Infrastructure
JISC Collections JISC Sub-Committees
UK funding councils for HE & FE UK
Research
Councils
4.
5. Overview
1. Internet and emergence of the Web 1994 -
â Digital access to metadata about Serial Content
* Content was mostly PRINT ; becoming digital
⢠SUNCAT & OpenURL Router, 2003 -
â for Serial Content that is available as Print & Digital
⢠Keepers Registry: e-journal preservation, 2008 â
â focus on DIGITAL, Digitised (and maybe print)
⢠Entitlement Registry & KnowledgeBasePlus, 2011/12
â for Serial Content that is DIGITAL (and subscribed)
⢠Forward Look, with 2020 Vision!!
â General scheme for DIGITAL & PRINT(?) Content
6. Spotlight upon essential role for the ISSN
and upon useful changes made by ISSN Network:
â Invention and use of the ISSN-L linking field
â ISSNs for digitised journal content (d-journals)
â Growth in ISSNs assigned to e-serials
* circa 100,000 ISSNs for electronic âcontinuing resourcesâ
8. 1. Some Consequences of The Web/Internet
⢠Essentials of supply chain have changed
⢠Libraries do not take physical custody of
key content
* online remotely, not on-shelf locally
⢠Role of libraries as trusted keepers of
information and culture has been disrupted
â Need assurance of continuity of access
⢠Can re-state the role of libraries graphically âŚ
9. Our Central Task: To ensure
researchers, students and their teachers have
ease and continuing access
to online scholarly resources
âeaseâ access âcontinuingâ
to content & services
access to long-term
usability
Licence restricted back content preservation
open
Classic use case: libraries secure provision of journal content
P.Burnhill, Edinburgh 2009
10. EDINA
began in 1996 as a JISC National Datacentre at the
University of Edinburgh
â Art Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, Compendex, EconLit, INSPEC,
MLA, PAIS, etc
In 1994, we had launched SALSER, the first (one of)
national union catalogues on the Web:
â union catalogue of serials:60 libraries in Scotland
* 14 universities, National Library of Scotland, special libraries
* Emphasis on assisting the searcher and visits to other libraries
â early use of WWW and also use of Z39.50 for federated searching
In late 1990s, we gained knowledge of distributed
architecture and Z39.50 in the JOIN-UP Programme:
Table of Contents & British Library Document Supply,
with federated searching using Z39.50 and then the
use of OpenURL
11. EDINA
â Art Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, Compendex, EconLit, INSPEC,
⢠We had SALSER, a national union catalogue for Scotland on the Web
⢠We had knowledge of distributed architecture and Z39.50
⢠We were learning the importance of the ISSN
And then âŚ
⌠in 1995/6, CIB (Bologna) made contact to
propose an EU project: the CASA Project âŚ
12. CASA: âCo-operative Archive on Serials & Articlesâ
⢠EU 4th Framework: Telematics for Libraries Programme
⢠Prof. J. Di Cocco, CIB (Bologna, It); [A. Bollini, A. Citti, V. Verniti]
⢠Partners: CIB, ISSN-IC, ICCU (It), Ariadne (It), EDINA (UK) + many others (It)
â F.Pelle
⢠3-year, 2-phase project that began in 1997
â 2nd phase: January 1998 - December 2000
⢠By 2nd phase, focus of project was switching from centralised
âArchiveâ to distributed âActivityâ, hence new âdescriptive titleâ:
⢠CASA: âCo-operative Activity on Serials & Articlesâ
â˘
(although âtitle properâ remained unchanged)
[From a PPT presented to EU Commission in Luxembourg, November 2000]
13. The information chain
need to âverifyâ the object: ISSN as âidentifierâ
to provide the linchpin
not all serial lists have ISSN present ď
Verify
identification of article/serial
Discover Locate Request Access
article of article/serial access/delivery article of
interest service of article/serial interest
Based on the MODELS verbs (UKOLN, UK)
[From a PPT presented to EU Commission in Luxembourg, November 2000]
14. UK decides to create union catalogue of serials
⢠www.SUNCAT.ac.uk , 2005 -
â v. many titles, mostly print; CONSER + ISSN + DOAJ
* British Library, Oxford, Cambridge etc; 85 libraries
â ISSN used to enhance OPAC records & assist matching, but
missing/unassigned ISSNs
Now funded as a JISC Core Service
15. a Locate facility for researchers & students on the Web
www.SUNCAT.ac.uk
16. and for researchers
& students âon the go âŚâ
⢠Service enhancement:
mobile App/geo-locate
SUNCAT - âwho holds what where?â
17. SUNCAT â extra functions
1. Source of catalogue records for Contributing
Libraries, including ISSN records
2. Support for researchers to access to text, via:
â Tables of Content (ToC)
â the UK OpenURL Router
* a register of OpenURL Routers used by Institutions
â the UK Access Management Federation (Shibboleth)
⢠Support for decision-making by libraries who want to
remove little-used journals from their shelves
â UKResearchReserve (UKRR)
* de-shelving; print archiving
âif it is worth archiving it should have an identifierâ
18. 3. E-journal Preservation: Who looks after what?
⢠Switch of focus:
âDigital/online/electronic only
âDigital preservation
19. Our Central Task: To ensure
researchers, students and their teachers have
ease and continuing access
to online scholarly resources
âeaseâ access âcontinuingâ
to content & services
access to long-term
usability
Licence restricted back content preservation
open
Classic use case: libraries secure provision of journal content
P.Burnhill, Edinburgh 2009
20. E-journal Preservation: Who looks after what?
⢠EDINA had gained some experience through
â CLOCKSS (EDINA represents U. of Edinburgh) and
â UK LOCKSS Alliance (Digital Curation Centre & EDINA)
⢠In 2007, JISC had commissioned scoping study for a
e-journal preservation registry which suggested
basing this on SUNCAT
⢠EDINA & ISSN-IC combined as partners in
the JISC-funded PEPRS Project in 2008.
⢠The design of the E-journal Preservation Registry
had the ISSN the centre from the start âŚ
21. Abstract Data Model: Figure 1 in reference paper in Serials, March 2009
SERVICES: user requirements
m2m/API E-J Preservation Registry Service
Piloting an
E-journals E-Journal METADATA
Preservation Preservation on preservation action
(b)
Registry Registry
Service (a)
METADATA Digital Preservation Agencies
e.g. CLOCKSS, Portico; BL, KB;
on extant e-journals UK LOCKSS Alliance etc.
Data dependency
ISSN
Register
22. E-journal Preservation: Who looks after what?
⢠The outcome of the PEPRS project is
the Keepers Registry, http://thekeepers.org
â Launched as a full Beta service in October 2011, at the
ISSN Directorsâ Meeting in Sarajevo
⢠Aiming to be a global facility, operating at web-
scale, with international governance âŚ
23. http://thekeepers.org
The Keepers Registry allows you to search on
title or ISSN
* and with the ISSN-L as the key matching
field, ISSNs for print can be tolerated *
Also acts as showcase
for archiving
organisations
3 CLOCKSS Nodes in Europe:
Humboldt University, Germany
UniversitĂ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy
University of Edinburgh, Scotland UK
24. ISSN & ISSN-L has been essential
Progress To Date: [ISSN-L as the basic unit] 17,000 unique titles
now âpreservedâ by the 7 archiving organisations registered as
Keepers; âprogressâ for a further 10,000.
Some overlap, titles being preserved by more than one
agency: good ď
But
1. The coverage of volume/issues held is incomplete ď
2. Still many more titles to be preserved:
⢠The 17,000 âpreservedâ includes both the âborn-digitalâ e-
25. http://thekeepers.org
Can also search on
publisher
** as bonus for EDINA & ISSN-IC,
the Keepers report the current
publisher in their metadata **
+ 3 others waiting:
This helps the searcher but, as noted later,
from Canada, UK and USA
this could help build a Publisher
Information Database linked to the ISSN.
26. Busy building international supportâŚ
2008: JISC Journals WG, London; ISSN National Directors Meeting
2009: NASIG Annual Conference, Ashville NC, USA;
Lib. of Academy of Science, Beijing; ISSN Directors, Beijing;
PARSE.Insight, Germany; Knowledge Exchange, Edinburgh
2010: E-journals are Forever Workshop, JISC/DPC, London;
IFLA 2010, Gothenburg; RLUK Conference, Edinburgh;
Columbia Univ., NYC
2011: UKSG; ISSN Governing Body; ARL, Montreal; ALA;
JISC Archiving Implementation Group (JARVIG) âŚ
2012: Digital Preservation Coalition; ACNP/NILDE; poster at LIBER
(June); UNESCO Conference in Vancouver (September)
P.Burnhill, F.Pelle, P.Godefroy, F.Guy, M.Macgregor, A.Rusbridge &
C.Rees
Piloting an e-journals preservation registry service.
Serials 22(1) March 2009. [UK Serials Group]
27. 4. E-Licensing: Who has entitlement to what?
⢠In days of print, what was paid for was
put on the shelf, so the back-copy was
there for perpetual access and use.
Reminder
Ensuring Continuity of Access means 2
things:
1. Preservation
2. Access to Back-Copy: the digital shelf
28. Our Central Task: To ensure
researchers, students and their teachers have
ease and continuing access
to online scholarly resources
âeaseâ access âcontinuingâ
to content & services
long-term
usability
Licence restricted
access to preservation
back content
open
P.Burnhill, Edinburgh 2009
29. Reminder: Consequences of Web/Internet
⢠Essentials of supply chain have changed
* licensed to access, not sale for delivery of goods (content)
* But is sale of good = access service + sale of entitlement??
⢠Libraries do not take physical custody of key
content
* online remotely, not on-shelf locally
⢠Role of libraries as trusted keepers of
information and culture has been disrupted
â Need assurance of continuity of access
* of all content for future generations
* of the back copies, especially if post-cancellation of the licence
30. E-Licensing: Who has entitlement to what?
⢠In 2010, EDINA & JISC Collections began
to investigate how best to support libraries
(and their patrons) through access to e-
journal content post-cancellation.
⢠We have been looking to see how we
can learn from the design for the
Keepers Registry
32. E-Licensing: Who has entitlement to what?
⢠About the same time, 2010/11, the UK Standing
Committee of University & Research Libraries
(SCURL) was investigating the cost-benefits of an
infrastructure for âshared servicesâ.
⢠This is all coming together for a shared service
for Electronic Resource Management (ERM)
in what is called KnowledgeBasePLus (KB+)
All work-in-progress, but some (more) diagrams
that may suggest what is going on âŚ
⌠and the importance and potential role of ISSN
33. Library Provides OPAC & User Has Online Access
Serial
DOI
ISSN
Article
delivers
OPAC
bibliographi
c record Platform
uses
(âTwo Systemsâ Dempsey)
Library belongs to
Reader
Institution
34. Issuing has Authorsâ
Body
Serial Vol. # Date
Final Copy
is DOI
ISSN issued
Is/authorises as Issue Article
Org/ID
Publisher(s) Table of
Contents
âas RDF Triplesâ
Basic bibliographic elements
Library belongs to
Patron
Org/ID Institution UKAMF
35. has
Serial
DOI
ISSN
Is/authorises Article
Publisher(s)
delivers
Licence/
Holdings
Package knows about Platform
Subscription Taken may differ in Licence Subscription Agent
(Terms & Conditions) and Content: Taken Date
(a) needed for digital library Terms
(b) and by librarian â buys uses
âwhat serials are in Package?â
Library belongs to
Patron
Institution UKAMF
36. eJournal Publications Database eISSN / ISSN-L
has
Serial
which Serials in which Packages?
Is/authorises
-> Need very good metadata
Org/ID
that relates Serials (ISSN)
with current Publishers
Publisher(s)
Licence/
Is/authorises
Holdings
Package Licence to buy/access Serials
Subscription Is often offered in Packages,
Agent Subscription
Offered and negotiated by Consortia
Consortium
NESLi Negotiator
Deal
Libraryâs
own
Deal
Library
PB/EDINA 2012 Institution
37. 5. Forward Look, with 2020 Vision!!
â General scheme for DIGITAL & PRINT(?) Content
â Semantic Web, RDF Triples, URIs and all that jazz
â Print will be on shelves for a long while yet, and the
visit to a library elsewhere may be as (or more)
important as (than) a visit to your own library
â Hope to be sitting on a beach in Puglia in 2020
38. In the UK I recall the JOIN-UP Programme in which 4 Projects tried to
become an integrated set of National Services but failed ď
Discover
Portals: Desk Local Subject Other
top Inst. RDN
Projects that
ZETOC GetRef GetCopy DOCUSEND
wanted to be
Services:
Rights: Subscriber Non-Subscriber
Medium: Print Electronic Print Electronic
Geography: Local Remote Local Remote
Union Aggregator/ Document Delivery
Sources: OPAC
List Publisher Service
39. CASA WP4: Serial Services Directory
Of fer Locat ion ( URI)
Another interesting
Part y Service It em Terms and Condit ions
graphic. CASA WP4
made reference to
XML/RDF + Z39.50
Serial Volume Issue Art icle
But did not go beyond
Loan Subscript ion Full-Text Delivery
the prototype ď
...
d
Publisher Supplier Union Cat alogLibrary
...
Bollini, Burnhill & Di Cocco, 1998
40. To return to the essential role for the ISSN
& useful changes being made by ISSN Network
1. Invention and use of the ISSN-L linking field
* Makes a âfamilyâ of ISSN (print & for electronic) for easier linking
â ISSNs for digitised journal content (d-journals)
* (in my opinion) Makes the electronic/digital the general case
â as print becomes the special case â âfixityâ of content
* and do not need (or want) a different ISSN for iPads etc
â ISSNs for e-serials will keep on growing
* as digitised versions of (unassigned) print journals emerge (libraries)
â Wish to have ISSN integrate within Semantic Web
â Need to recognise other identifiers (eg DOI, those created in
union catalogues, and a muddle of URIs)
* They will not go away
* Need for âcross-walkâ between different identifiers for same Serial,
as âsame asâ in RDF Triples
41. Grazie Mille ď
Time for Q&A ???
Information about all projects and services, including
âThe Community Report: What EDINA Doesâ
http://edina.ac.uk
A splendid Helpdesk: edina@ed.ac.uk
Peter Burnhill: p.burnhill@ed.ac.uk
42. eJournal Publications Database eISSN / ISSN-L
Org/ID
Issuing owns Authorsâ
Body
Serial Vol. # Date
Final Copy
Imprint
is DOI
issued
Is/authorises Date as Issue Article
Org/ID
has
lists
Publisher(s) Table of
Contents can deliver
Licence/
Is/authorises Holdings
Date
Subscription Package Package knows about Platform
Agent Subscription Subscription
Agent
Offered Taken Date
Org/ID Org/ID
negotiates
Terms
uses
Consortium buys
NESLi
Deal Is/authorises
Libraryâs
own
Deal
Library belongs to
Patron
PB/EDINA 2012 Institution UKAMF
43. eJournal Publications Database eISSN / ISSN-L Date
RepNet
Issuing has has Authorsâ
Body
Serial Volume
Final Copy
DOI
Keepers
Is/authorises Date Issue Article
Transfer
Publisher(s) Imprint
Table of
Suncat Contents delivers
Licence/
Is/authorises
Holdings
KB+ JouTOCs
Subscription Package Package knows about Platform
Agent Subscription Subscription
Agent
Offered Taken PeCAN
JISC Coll. JUSP
Date
Consortium buys uses
NESLi Negotiator
Deal
Libraryâs
own belongs to
Deal Library Patron
PB/EDINA 2012 UKAMF
Hinweis der Redaktion
JISC is the Joint Systems Committee of the UK funding bodies for higher and further education. EDINA and Mimas are designated as National Data Centres, at the Universities of Edinburgh and Manchester, respectively. Like JISC itself and JANET / UKERNA, EDINA and Mimas are HEFCE-related Bodies, governed by Funding Agreements between HEFCE and those two Universities. JISC has a number of sub-committees which help inform policy and also watch over programmes of funding and the operation of services, such as those provided by the two National Data Centres. It has also set up a company, JISC Collections as a legal body to broker licences. UK = England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland EDINA & Mimas are based at Universities of Edinburgh and Manchester
The priority task for librarians and academic support, locally and âat the network-levelâ, is to ensure that researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources. Presented here is a framework and analysis that might assist understanding of that task. Particular attention is given to article-length work published in e-journals, available in digital format, online under some form of licence - either by subscription or to be observed by the user (as is the case with Creative Commons licensing). Ease of access is regarded here as to do with usability and with licence conditions and management of authorisation. Continuity of access is regarded here as including both long-term preservation and continuing access to back copy, regardless of current subscription status. There is also reminder that we all seek ease of access to back content as well as current content, for what is online in digital format as well as what has long been on-shelf as bound paper: ease and continuity of access to content on the digital shelf. The challenge is to reason what are the cost-effective points of service for that content, and identify the required infrastructure, typically as authoritative network-level registries - above the level of the institution, potentially of international as well as national character. This is about access; not considered here are the additional, although related tasks of âsearch & discoveryâ and âsharingâ, meaning the formal issue (or publication) of such material. Accordingly, only passing reference is made to rhe open access agend: journals registered in the DOAJ, or articles (most often the authorsâ final copy) deposited in Institutional Repositories (IRs), and to the network-level role played by the Depot for that purpose.
10 10 Phase 1 completed in 1997 Phase 2 agreed for 1998 & 1999 EDINA will host a CASA workshop in the UK during 1998 to focus on ISSN based identifiers
12 12 13 Verify identifier, e.g. ISSN, SICI is the linchpin of the MODELS chain ISSN key to unique identification of serials provides an economic way to enhance existing records CASA will provide verify function through ISSN-based identifier
The priority task for librarians and academic support, locally and âat the network-levelâ, is to ensure that researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources. Presented here is a framework and analysis that might assist understanding of that task. Particular attention is given to article-length work published in e-journals, available in digital format, online under some form of licence - either by subscription or to be observed by the user (as is the case with Creative Commons licensing). Ease of access is regarded here as to do with usability and with licence conditions and management of authorisation. Continuity of access is regarded here as including both long-term preservation and continuing access to back copy, regardless of current subscription status. There is also reminder that we all seek ease of access to back content as well as current content, for what is online in digital format as well as what has long been on-shelf as bound paper: ease and continuity of access to content on the digital shelf. The challenge is to reason what are the cost-effective points of service for that content, and identify the required infrastructure, typically as authoritative network-level registries - above the level of the institution, potentially of international as well as national character. This is about access; not considered here are the additional, although related tasks of âsearch & discoveryâ and âsharingâ, meaning the formal issue (or publication) of such material. Accordingly, only passing reference is made to rhe open access agend: journals registered in the DOAJ, or articles (most often the authorsâ final copy) deposited in Institutional Repositories (IRs), and to the network-level role played by the Depot for that purpose.
The key aspects of this diagram are the data dependencies â seeking simplicity by linking out across the network to the most authoritative source. In this case, as shown in (a) itâs the ISSN Register for authoritative information on known e-journals â and after six years work the number of ISSNs assigned to e-serials has increased from about 13,000 to over 100,000 *probably* accounting for well over 95% of the 30 to 40 thousand e-journals that the academic and scientific world is interested in. And as shown in (b) what we want to have is authoritative statement made by the archiving organisations on their archival actions. Another feature of this approach is that the responsibility for being up-to-date is re-defined. Of course, there is some simplicity here. To name just two complexities. The fields for describing archival action â and the terms of access â are not standard and we have some way to go on that. Second, some of hose agencies â and there will be more being added all the time â want to report archival action on digitised journals, for which use of the the ISSN Register currently has major limitations. More on all that to be said later, along with the general comment that this schematic deals only with âtitlesâ not with the extent of a given title that is archived â it side-steps the matter of the holdings statement. But in Phase two, and with the release of the Public Beta we have begun to tackle âholdingsâ.
The priority task for librarians and academic support, locally and âat the network-levelâ, is to ensure that researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources. Presented here is a framework and analysis that might assist understanding of that task. Particular attention is given to article-length work published in e-journals, available in digital format, online under some form of licence - either by subscription or to be observed by the user (as is the case with Creative Commons licensing). Ease of access is regarded here as to do with usability and with licence conditions and management of authorisation. Continuity of access is regarded here as including both long-term preservation and continuing access to back copy, regardless of current subscription status. There is also reminder that we all seek ease of access to back content as well as current content, for what is online in digital format as well as what has long been on-shelf as bound paper: ease and continuity of access to content on the digital shelf. The challenge is to reason what are the cost-effective points of service for that content, and identify the required infrastructure, typically as authoritative network-level registries - above the level of the institution, potentially of international as well as national character. This is about access; not considered here are the additional, although related tasks of âsearch & discoveryâ and âsharingâ, meaning the formal issue (or publication) of such material. Accordingly, only passing reference is made to rhe open access agend: journals registered in the DOAJ, or articles (most often the authorsâ final copy) deposited in Institutional Repositories (IRs), and to the network-level role played by the Depot for that purpose.