SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 53
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
HOUSE BILL NO. 4820
AN ACT CREATING THE
 PROVINCE OF NUEVA
    CAMARINES

 A PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE
         November 15, 2011
INTRODUCTION

    HB NO. 4820 WAS
APPROVED IN THE HOUSE
  OF CONGRESS WITH A
 VOTE OF 229 AGAINST 1


                         2
FOUR (4) CAMARINES SUR
      CONGRESSMEN JOINTLY
     SPONSORED HB NO. 4820

1. Rep. Arnulfo P. Fuentebella (4th District)

2. Rep. Luis R. Villafuerte (3rd District)
3. Rep. Diosdado Arroyo (2nd District)

4. Rep. Rolando R. Andaya, Jr. (1st District)
OTHER CONGRESSMEN SPONSORS
MAJORITY OF THE LOCAL
 LEADERS OF CAMARINES SUR
      SUPPORT HB 4820
 24 MAYORS
 24 VICE MAYORS
 MAJORITY OF COUNCILORS
 MAJORITY OF BARANGAY CAPTAINS
 NGOS AND CIVIC ORGNIZATIONS
 BUSINESS SECTOR, AND
 MANY NON-POLITICAL ORGS./GROUPS
MAYORS OF CAMARINES SUR
                    SUPPORTING HB 4820
  4TH DISTRICT                                            3RD DISTRICT
1 GOA             HON. ANTERO S. LIM                 10   CALABANGA      HON. EVELYN S. YU
                                                     11   BOMBON         HON. MA. LUISA DC. ANGELES
2 CARAMOAN        HON. CONSTANTINO H. CORDIAL, JR.
                                                     12   CAMALIGAN      HON.EMMANUEL T. PRADO
3 PRESENTACION HON. JOEY DELEÑA
                                                     13   CANAMAN        HON. EMMANUEL S. REQUEJO
4 SAGÑAY          HON. EVELYN B. FUENTEBELLA
                                                          2ND DISTRICT
5 SIRUMA          HON. KAREN POLINGA
                                                   14     GAINZA         HON. WILLIAM ABILAY
6 TIGAON          HON. ARNULF BRIAN B. FUENTEBELLA 15     LIBMANAN       HON. MARILYN A. JIMENEZ
7 TINAMBAC        HON. RUEL T. VELARDE             16     SAN FERNANDO   HON. EUGENIO LAGASCA JR.
                                                   17     PAMPLONA       HON. GEMINO IMPERIAL
  5TH DISTRICT                                     18     MINALABAC      HON. LEOVEGILDO BASMAYOR JR.
8 IRIGA CITY      HON. MADELAINE Y. ALFELOR-GAZMEN 19     PASACAO        HON. ASUNCION ARCEO
9 BAAO            HON. MELQUIADES I. GAITE         20     MILAOR         HON. ROGELIO A. FLORES




                                                                                                 6
BICOL REGION
COMPARATIVE STATISTICAL DATA
      PROVINCE            LAND AREA     POPULATION
                            (Km2)          2007
 ALBAY                       2,565.80     1,187,185
 CAMARINES NORTE             2,320.10       513,785
* CAMARINES SUR              5,502.00     1,693,821
 CATANDUANES              1,492.20        232,757
  MASBATE                 4,151.80        768,939
  SORSOGON                2,119.00        709,673
*CamarinesSur is the largest province in the Bicol
Region in terms of Land Area (30.23%) and
Population (33.17%)
Sources: LMB, NSCB &NSO
                                                      7
PROFILE OF                    1
                                                  4
CAMARINES
                                    2     3
SUR
                                              5




PARTICULARS                                           CY 2010
NO. OF TOWNS                                                35
NO. OF CITIES (Iriga-component, Naga- chartered)                2
NO. OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS                                  5
NO. OF BARANGAYS                                          1,036
POPULATION                                            1,693,821
                                                                    8
LEGAL BASIS OF HB NO. 4820

 1. Article X, Section 10 of the 1987
    Philippine Constitution.
 2. Section 461 of R.A. 7160 - 1991
    Local Government Code
Article X, Section 10 of the
1987 Philippine Constitution
No      province      xxx     may     be
xxxDIVIDEDxxx       or    its  boundary
substantially altered, EXCEPT         in
accordance     with     the    CRITERIA
established      in       the    LOCAL
GOVERNMENT CODE and subject to
approval by a majority of the votes cast
in a PLEBISCITE in the political units
DIRECTLY AFFECTED.
SECTION 461 OF R.A. 7160
 1991 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE
1. Average income for the last two years of not less than
     P20M, based on 1991 CPI (present value = P65M);
-and either-
2. Population of not less than 250,000;
-or-
3. Land area of not less tha 2,000 sq. km.
                PROVIDED:
1. The division does not reduce the income population, or land
    area of the LGU to less than the minimum requirements of
    this Code; and
2. The income classification of the original LGU shall not fall
    below its current classification prior to such division.
LEGAL COMPLIANCE
   OF HB NO. 4820 TO
 SECTION 461 OF RA 7160
(1991 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE)
COMPLIANCE OF H.B.
 4820 TO
 SECTION 461
 OF R.A. 7160
BLGF CERTIFICATION – MARCH 10, 2011
NSO CERTIFICATION - MARCH 07, 2011
LMB CERTIFICATION - APRIL 07, 2011


     PARTICULARS                 REQUIREMENTS        COMPLIANCE         COMPLIANCE
                                                    CAMARINES SUR          NUEVA
                                                    (MOTHER PROVINCE)    CAMARINES
                                                      DISTS. 1,2&3      (NEW PROVINCE)
                                                                         DISTS 4 & 5
AVE. INCOME (1991 CPI)                   P20.0 M       P283.48 M          P223.4 M
AND EITHER
                                      (2010=P65M)
POPULATION OR                           250,000         892,203            801,618
LAND AREA (sq. km.)                      2,000          2,531.60          2,970.4013
BLGF COMPUTATION OF THE
   AVERAGE ANNUAL INCOME

TO COMPUTE FOR THE AVE. ANNUAL INCOME FOR
2009 & 2010, THE 2009 & 2010 INCOME SHOULD BE
         DEFLATED BASED ON 1991 CPI
      THE DEFLATORS WERE ARRIVED AS FOLLOWS:
         1991 CPI(2000 as base year) = 53.60
         2009 CPI(2000 as base year) = 160.00
         2010 CPI(2000 as base year) = 166.10

          2009 DEFLATOR = 160.00/53.60 = 2.985
          2010 DEFLATOR = 166.10/53.60 = 3.099


                                                 14
INCOME CLASSIFICATION
To compute income classification:
Get actual income last 4 years (2007-2010)
Get the average then compare with income brackets

   INCOME CLASSIFICATION BRACKET OF PROVINCES

      1ST CLASS – P450.0 M OR MORE
      2ND CLASS – P360.0 M TO P 450.0 M
      3RD CLASS – P270.0 M TO P360.0 M
      4TH CLASS – P180.0 M TO P270.0 M
      5TH CLASS – P90.0 M TO P180.0 M
      6TH CLASS – BELOW P90.0

                                                    15
MOTHER PROVINCE REMAINS
    AS A FIRST CLASS PROVINCE
SECTION 461 OF R.A. 7160 MANDATES THAT THE INCOME
CLASSIFICATION OF MOTHER PROVINCE IS NOT REDUCED

                YEAR                         INCOME
                 2007                      P 567,475,416.64
                 2008                      P 671,207,205.49
                 2009                      P 848,188,234.55
                                                               1ST CLASS
                 2010                      P 848,088,883.09    PER DOF DO
 TOTALS                                   P 2,934,959,739.09    NO. 23-08
                                                               DTD 7/29/09
 DIVIDED BY                                        4 YEARS
 AVE. INCOME                               P 733,739,934.94    P450M Average
BLGF Certification dated March 10, 2011                        Income for 4 yrs
                                                                            16
NUEVA CAMARINES
       AS A SEPARATE PROVINCE
         MAY ALSO BECOME A
        FIRST CLASS PROVINCE
        YEAR                        COMPUTED INCOME
         2007                              P 478,288,701.38
         2008                              P 548,315,572.68
         2009                              P 648,611,023.38
         2010                              P 689,675,196.63    1ST CLASS
                                                               PER DOF DO
 TOTALS                                   P 2,364,890,494.07    NO. 23-08
 DIVIDED BY                                        4 YEARS     DTD 7/29/09

 AVE. INCOME                               P 591,222,623.52
                                                               P450M Average
BLGF Certification dated March 10, 2011
                                                               Income for 4 17
                                                                            yrs
COMPARATIVE DATA ON NEW &
   ORIGINAL (MOTHER) PROVINCE
        PARTICULARS                      MOTHER PROVINCE         NUEVA CAMARINES
                                            DISTS 1,2&3             DISTS. 4 & 5
NO. TOWNS                                   19 + NAGA CITY        16 + IRIGA CITY
POPULATION                                         892,203                  801,618
LAND AREA (sq. km.)                             2,531.60                2,970.40
AVE. INCOME (1991 CPI)                          P283.5 M                P223.4 M
INCOME CLASSIFICATION                    P733.7 M-1ST CLASS      P591.2 M-1ST CLASS
                                                                  COMPUTED RESULTING INCOME
(AVERAGE FOUR YEARS INCOME)                                            CLASSIFICATION


2010 REGULAR INCOME                           P 848.1 M              P 689.7 M
BLGF CERTIFICATION – MARCH 10, 2011
NSO CERTIFICATION - MARCH 07, 2011
                                               1
LMB CERTIFICATION - APRIL 07, 2011
                                                             3          4
                                                     2
                                           MOTHER                             NUEVA
                                         PROVINCE                   5         CAMARINES
                                      Dists. 1,2, & 3                         Dists. 4 & 5
                                                                                              18
RATIONALE FOR PROPOSING TO
  CREATE A NEW PROVINCE
              1

                       3       4
                  2
          MOTHER                   NUEVA
        PROVINCE           5       CAMARINES
     Dists. 1,2, & 3               Dists. 4 & 5




 1. GOOD GOVERNANCE
 2. POVERTY INCIDENCE
                                                  19
INDICATORS IN DETERMINING
     GOOD GOVERNANCE

• ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE INDEX

• POLITICAL GOVERNANCE INDEX

• ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE INDEX
    A. EDUCATION INDEX
    B. HEALTH INDEX
    C. POWER AND ICT INDEX

                                    20
PER NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION
 BOARD (NSCB) ANALYSIS, THE FOLLOWING
  ARE INDICATORS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE

• ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE INDEX
 • Total Financial Resources Generated Per
   Capita
 • Per Capita Tax and Non-Tax
 • Per Capita Total Deposits
 • Per Capita Expenditure on Social Services
 • Unemployment Rate
 • Underemployment Rate
 • Inflation Rate
 • Poverty Gap
 • Poverty Incidence
INDICATORS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE
           (C0NTINUED)

• POLITICAL GOVERNANCE INDEX
     •Crime Solution Efficiency Rate
     •Voter’s Turnout Rate

• ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE INDEX
 A. EDUCATION INDEX
 •    Elementary Teacher to Pupil Ratio
 •    High School Teacher to student Ratio
 •    No. of Public Elem. Sch. per 1000 School Age
      population
 •    No. of Public High Sch. per 1000 School Age pop’n
INDICATORS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE
               (C0NTINUED)


A. EDUCATION INDEX (continued)
 •    Enrolment in Gov’t. Elem Sch per 1000 Sch. Age Pop’n
 •    Enrolment in Gov’t. HS Sch per 1000 Sch. Age Pop’n
 •    Elementary Pupil-Classroom Ratio
 •    High School Pupil-Classroom Ratio
B. HEALTH INDEX
 –   Total Health Personnel per 1000 Population
 –   % Birth less than 2500 grams
 –   % Of Household with access to safe water
 –   Barangay Health Station per 100,000 Population
C. POWER AND ICT INDEX
     – Power Index/Electrification
     – ICT Index (Telephone Density per 1000 Population)
IN DETERMINING
      POVERTY LEVEL
1. AN ANNUAL FAMILY
  INCOME OF PhP16,000 and
  below is classified as “poor”




                                  24
PRESENT OUTLOOK OF CAMARINES SUR
 CAMARINES SUR IS AMONG THE BIGGEST
  PROVINCES IN THE COUNTRY. IT’S LAND AREA
  IS 5,502 SQUARE KM WHICH IS ALMOST AS BIG
  AS THE PROVINCES OF ILOCOS NORTE AND
  ILOCOS SUR COMBINED (6,100 SQUARE KM)
 RANKS SECOND TO THE LOWEST IN GOOD
  GOVERNANCE (78TH OUT OF 79 PROVINCES)
  MAGUINDANAO BEING THE 79TH.
 2ND TO THE HIGHEST POVERTY INCIDENCE IN
  BICOL REGION AND THIRD OVER ALL IN THE
  MAGNITUDE OF POOR FAMILIES IN THE
  PHILIPPINES
                                              25
MAGNITUDE OF THE AREA
OF THE PROVINCE

• Camarines Sur has 1,036
  Barangays
• There is only 365 DAYS in a year
• It will take more than 3 years to
  visit all barangays


                                      26
SMALL AND BIG PROVINCES COMPARED
                                                                           NSCB, 2011
                                                                                   GGI
       Provinces                                                        POVERTY
                        SMALLER                   Area     Pop’n,                  (79 -
      which have                                                        CLUSTER/
                      PROVINCES         FROM      (km2)     2007       INCIDENCE worst)
       decided to     IlocosNorte   Ilocos         3,504    547,284     5/12.4%     24
     divide in the    Ilocos Sur    Ilocos         2,596    632,255     4/ 17.0%    12
past have done        QUIRINO       N.Viscaya      2,323    397,837    4/ 12.3%     14
  much better in      SIQUIJOR      Negros Or.       337     87,695     2/ 38.0%     2
  terms of good       AURORA        Quezon         3,147    187,802     3/ 24.2%    17
    governance,       BILIRAN       Leyte            536    150,031     2/ 34.9%    15
          poverty     GUIMARAS      Iloilo           604    151,238     4/ 20.5%    38
 alleviation, and     KALINGA       Kalinga A.     3,231    103,633     3/ 25.9%     3
    in governing      CAMIGUIN      Misamis Or.      237     81,293     2/ 44.6%     1
their economic,       BIG PROV.
                      MASBATE       Sorsogon      4,151     768,939    1/54.2%     76
     political and
                                    Ambos
  administrative
                      CAM SUR       Cam           5,502    1,693,821   1/ 47.0%    78
           affairs.   QUEZON                      9,069    1,646,510   3/ 32.5%    74
                      LEYTE                       6,515    1,722,036   3/ 34.3%    77
                      The state of poverty in divided provinces was much
                                                                       27
                      better than in Cam Sur.
Negative consequences
                       of “BIGNESS”
     - Public Finance Institute of the Philippines, Headed byAIM President and former
                           Sec. of Finance Hon. Roberto De Ocampo

 Difficulty of establishing accountability.
 Too many people involved
 Residents are at a loss on who is doing what
  and how redress can be sought when public
  service is badly delivered.
 The absence of accountability induces under-
  performance,      abuse     of  powers, and
  inefficiencies, and corruption.
28
BIGGER LGUsDON’T NECESSARILY
        MEAN BETTER
The Province of Rizal which was broken into smaller
local government units and was not merely fragmented
into 2 or 3 separate and independent LGUs, but 15
LGUs, namely:
  1.   Las Pińas       6. Malabon      11. Makati
  2.   Parańaque       7. Navotas      12. Pasay
  3.   Muntinglupa     8. Pasig        13. Mandaluyong
  4.   Taguig          9. Marikina     14. Quezon City
  5.   Pateros         10.Caloocan     15. San Juan
The Province of Rizal did not lose its financial viability
and its socio-economic growth stunted.
                                                        29
LOGODEF STUDY
• The primordial concern of the Local Government Code in
  establishing the minimum standards for creating a new
  province is to establish a local government system that is
  capable of local governance and local development. Said
  minimum standards should not be ignored because that
  would be anathema to the long-term foundation of robust
  central-local government relations for development.

• The provisions of the Local Government Code establishing
  criteria or requisites for creation of a new province “CANNOT
  BE INTERPRETED TO MEAN THAT BIGGER LOCAL
  GOVERNMENTS ARE BETTER AND MORE VIABLE
  MECHANISM FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE”.

                                                                  30
Camarines Sur is poorly governed --
   compared to its regional peers and
          the entire country
• Compared to the 79 provinces
  in the Philippines, Camarines
  Sur is ranked 78 in good
  governance in 2008, down by
  two ranks compared to 2006
 (NSCB, 2011)
• “Compared to its regional
  peers,Cam Sur is the worst-
  run province in the entire
  Bicol region.”(Prof. Ben Diokno,
 UP School of Economics, former
 DBM Secretary)




                                     31
Poverty incidence and the number of
poor people increase in CamarinesSur at
 rates higher than the national average
 In 2009, poverty
                                    Poverty       Magnitude of Poor             Change
     incidence in                  Incidence          People
    Cam Sur was                    2006   2009     2006         2009        %       No.
47.0, higher than
      the national   Philippines   26.4   26.5   22,173,190   23,142,481   4.4     969,291

  average of 26.5    Region V      45.2   45.1    2,335,684    2,422,267   3.7      86,583
     and regional    Albay         42.8   43.6     512,762      512,079    -0.1       -683
 average of 45.1.
                     Cam Norte     41.5   42.3     215,911      232,685    7.8      16,774
        Except for
     Masbate, its    Cam Sur       44.9   47.0     760,730      794,832    4.5      34,102

 other provincial    Catanduanes   44.3   28.5      99,457       66,801    -32.8   -32,656
      peers in the   Masbate       52     54.2     425,966      441,688    3.7      15,722
Bicol region had     Sorsogon      44.9   41.3     320,858      374,183    16.6     53,325
       addressed
   poverty much      From 2006 to 2009, the number of poor people
           better.   in Cam Sur increased by 2% or by 34,102.
                                                                                         32
Cebu, Negros Occidental and Camarines Sur continue to
have the biggest share in the total number of poor families




                                                     33
Economic Arguments
by: Prof. Benjamin Diokno, UP School of Economics, former DBM Secretary



The body of evidence is that Camarines Sur is not
governed well and it has not addressed the welfare
of its constituents. The dissatisfaction with the
present state of affairs explains the clamor for an
alternative province (Nueva Camarines). This bill
will give those who are against the present state
of affairs the right to ‘vote with their feet’ [a
phrase coined by Charles M. Tiebout in his seminal
article “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,”
Journal of Political Economy 64(October 1956), pp.
416-4240]                                           34
35
36
37
38
HOW DID CAMSUR PROVINCIAL
GOV’T SPEND TAXPAYERS MONEY
          IN 2010?
             PARTICULARS                      TOTALS
 Casuals                                 P    33,571,232.93
 Consultancy                                  22,304,821.10
 General Services                            120,385,877.69
 Other Professional Services                  10,460,241.46
 Gas, Oil & Lubricants                        35,625,319.03
 Donations                                    90,815,330.71
 Confidential Expense                         40,000,000.00
 Food Supplies                                97,775,981.28
 Security                                     22,304,821.10
 Other Supplies                               30,068,549.91
 Advertising                                   4,390,957.64
 Drugs and Medicine Expense                      133,547.13
 Medical, Dental & Laboratory Supplies            97,664.15
                                                              39
DISCRETIONARY FUNDS OF THE
        GOVERNOR
                        GOVERNOR’S          OTHER
     PARTICULARS          OFFICE          PROVINCIAL          TOTALS
                                           OFFICES
Casuals                 P 6,000,000.00                 P   P 33,476,000.00
                                           27,476,000.00
Consultancy               5,000,000.00                       21,570,000.00
                                           16,570,000.00
General Services         10,676,201.30     41,190,308.00     51,866,509.30
Other Prof. Services      2,000,000.00      6,619,500.00      8,619,500.00
Other MOOE                6,049,500.00    174,003,913.96    180,053,413.96
Donations                 6,967,032.32     65,897,515.52     72,864,547.84
Confidential Expense     30,000,000.00      2,368,932.00     32,368,932.00
Intelligence Expenses    25,685,697.00      2,000,000.00     27,685,697.00
TOTAL DICRETIONARY      P92,378,430.62   P336,126,169.48   P428,504,600.10
FUNDS OF THE GOV
                                                                         40
BREAKDOWN OF SPECIAL PURPOSE APPROPRIATION
       (PROVINCIAL ENGINEER’S OFFICE)
                      Particulars                       Amount           %
R&M-Office Buildings, School Buildings, Hospitals &      205,000.00    0.10%
Health Centers, Other Structures, Office Equipment,
Motor Vehicles, Highways and Bridges
R&M-Other Public Infrastructure                        18,000,000.00   8.43%
Construction-School Buildings                          10,000,000.00   4.68%
Construction-Other Infrastructure                     130,900,000.00   61.31%
Construction-Other Public Infra                        30,000,000.00   14.05%
Gasoline, Oil and Lubricants                           10,000,000.00   4.68%
Land Improvements                                       1,000,000.00   0.47%
Procurement-Motor Vehicle,IT Equipment & Software,      3,100,000.00   1.45%
Technical & Scientific Machinery &Eqpt, & Other PPE
Others                                                 10,302,515.57   4.83%
Total Special Purpose Appropriation (PEO)             213,507,515.57

OUT OF 213 M SPECIAL PURPOSE APPROPRIATION, 188 M OR
88% WAS USED ON OTHER PURPOSES WHICH PRACTICALLY
AMOUNTS TO AN ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUND
NEGLECT OF BASIC
       INFRASTRUCTURE
THE CY 2011 SPECIAL PURPOSE APPROPRIATION
OF P213.5 MILLION UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE
PROVINCIAL ENGINEER ALLOTED A MEASLY P205
THOUSAND FOR REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE OF:

    OFFICE BUILDING          P 1,000.00
    SCHOOL BUILDINGS         P 1,000.00
    HOSPITALS & HEALTH CTR   P 1,000.00
    OTHER STRUCTURES         P 1,000.00
    OFFICE EQUIPMENT         P     500.00
    MOTOR VEHICLES           P     500.00
    HIGHWAYS & BRIDGES       P 200,000.00
NEGLECT OF AGRICULTURE
THE CY 2011 BUDGET OF P41.4 MILLION OF THE
OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL AGRICULTURIST
ALLOTED A MEASLY P1.24 MILLION FOR THE
FOLLOWING:
    AGRICULTURAL MACHINERIES        P    30,000.00
    AGRI, FISHERY & FORESTRY EQPT   P    50,000.00
    OTHER MACHINERIES & EQPT        P    10,000.00
    OTHER PROPERTY, PLANT & EQPT    P    50,000.00
    ANIMAL/ZOOLOGICAL SUPPLIES      P 1,000,000.00
    AGRICULTURE & MARINE SUPPLIES   P 100,000.00
NEGLECT OF
                 HEALTH SERVICES
                                               Budget Allocation Per Person for CY 2011
                                       Total
                                      Budget MDL Food Drugs      MDL Cooking
                           Population /Pax Eqpt Supplies &Meds Supplies Gas
Camarines Sur               1,435,322    2.45 0.06  0.56   0.90    0.88  0.07
HOSPITALS
Provincial Health Office      62,024    5.16    0.32        -    1.61     3.22        -
LibmananDistrict              92,839    4.10    0.05     1.35    1.45     1.08     0.17
PartidoDistrict               35,768   12.76    0.14     4.75    4.19     3.40     0.28
Ragay District                47,743   10.03    0.21     3.35    3.14     3.14     0.19
SipocotDistrict               57,861    5.76    0.09     1.73    2.07     1.73     0.14
CaramoanMunicipal             39,642    8.00    0.13     2.52    2.65     2.52     0.18
OcampoDistrict                36,316    8.31    0.06     1.10    3.30     3.44     0.41
San Ramon Community           97,983    0.97    0.02     0.05    0.51     0.36     0.03
SirumaCommunity               17,035   11.45    0.29     0.88    4.70     4.70     0.88
Garchitorena Medicare         24,825   10.84    0.20     2.42    4.03     4.03     0.16
TinambacMunicipal             59,125    3.97    0.17     0.34    1.69     1.69     0.08
BuhiCommunity                 70,765    1.98    0.07     0.07    1.13     0.64     0.07
PresentacionMunicipal         20,266       -       -        -       -        -        -
CONCLUSION
1. THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS HAVE
   BEEN COMPLIED WITH;

2. THE PROCESS OF
   CONSULTATION WAS FULLY
   OBSERVED;

                             45
CONCLUSION
3. THE OLD CAMARINES SUR HAS BEEN
   TRYING UNSUCCESSFULLY TO
   COPE WITH THE PROBLEMS AND
   NEEDS OF A LARGE AREA (5,502 SQ.
   KM), AND A BIG NUMBER OF
   POPULATION (1,693,821), TOWNS (35),
   CITY (1) AND BARANGAYS (1,036)
   (EXCLUDING NAGA CITY);

                                     46
CONCLUSION

4. THE TWO EMERGING PROVINCES
   WILL DEVELOP AN AREA ROUGHLY
   50% OF THE OLD PROVINCE AND
   SEE TO THE NEEDS OF ALSO
   ROUGHLY 50% OF ITS
   POPULATION;


                              47
CONCLUSION
5. THE FUNDS TO BE MADE
   AVAILABLE TO BOTH EMERGING
   PROVINCES WILL BE MORE THAN
   THAT OF THE OLD (WHOLE)
   PROVINCE IN TERMS OF PER
   CAPITA AND PER SQUARE KM.


                                 48
CONCLUSION
6. IT IS NOT TRUE THAT DIVIDING A
    PROVINCE WEAKENS BOTH NEW
    PROVINCES AS CAN BE SEEN IN
    THE FIGURES BELOW:
                  REGULAR INCOME     INCOME CLASS

MOTHER PROVINCE                      FIRST CLASS
– CAMARINES SUR
                    P848.1 M
(DIST 1,2&3)
NUEVA CAMARINES                      MAY BECOME
(DIST 4&5)
                    P689.7 M
                    BLGF:RESULTING   FIRST CLASS
                   COMPUTED INCOME
                                                    49
CONCLUSION

7. DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS WILL
   BE FOCUSED ON SMALLER AREA
   AND FEWER LOCAL
   GOVERNMENT UNITS; SERVICES
   WILL BE DELIVERED TO FEWER
   POPULATION.


                                50
CONCLUSION
8. THE CREATION OF THE PROVINCE OF
   NUEVA CAMARINES WILL ACCELERATE
   THE POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND
   ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL
   GREATLY BENEFIT NOT ONLY THE
   PEOPLE IN THE PROPOSED PROVINCE,
   BUT ALSO THOSE IN THE MOTHER
   PROVINCE OF CAMARINES SUR, NOT
   TO MENTION THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.


                                  51
IN SUMMARY
 THE CREATION OF NUEVA CAMARINES
    SHALL BRING ABOUT BETTER
GOVERNANCE AND IMPROVED ECONOMIC
  PROSPECTS WHICH COULD LEAD TO
  REDUCTION IN POVERTY INCIDENCE.
              ERGO
ACCELERATED ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE TWO
 CAMARINES PROVINCES (CAMARINES
     SUR AND NUEVA CAMARINES)
                                52
THANK YOU


            53

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfSABC News
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinIpsos France
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (9)

Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
 

Nc for senate dec2

  • 1. HOUSE BILL NO. 4820 AN ACT CREATING THE PROVINCE OF NUEVA CAMARINES A PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE November 15, 2011
  • 2. INTRODUCTION HB NO. 4820 WAS APPROVED IN THE HOUSE OF CONGRESS WITH A VOTE OF 229 AGAINST 1 2
  • 3. FOUR (4) CAMARINES SUR CONGRESSMEN JOINTLY SPONSORED HB NO. 4820 1. Rep. Arnulfo P. Fuentebella (4th District) 2. Rep. Luis R. Villafuerte (3rd District) 3. Rep. Diosdado Arroyo (2nd District) 4. Rep. Rolando R. Andaya, Jr. (1st District)
  • 5. MAJORITY OF THE LOCAL LEADERS OF CAMARINES SUR SUPPORT HB 4820  24 MAYORS  24 VICE MAYORS  MAJORITY OF COUNCILORS  MAJORITY OF BARANGAY CAPTAINS  NGOS AND CIVIC ORGNIZATIONS  BUSINESS SECTOR, AND  MANY NON-POLITICAL ORGS./GROUPS
  • 6. MAYORS OF CAMARINES SUR SUPPORTING HB 4820 4TH DISTRICT 3RD DISTRICT 1 GOA HON. ANTERO S. LIM 10 CALABANGA HON. EVELYN S. YU 11 BOMBON HON. MA. LUISA DC. ANGELES 2 CARAMOAN HON. CONSTANTINO H. CORDIAL, JR. 12 CAMALIGAN HON.EMMANUEL T. PRADO 3 PRESENTACION HON. JOEY DELEÑA 13 CANAMAN HON. EMMANUEL S. REQUEJO 4 SAGÑAY HON. EVELYN B. FUENTEBELLA 2ND DISTRICT 5 SIRUMA HON. KAREN POLINGA 14 GAINZA HON. WILLIAM ABILAY 6 TIGAON HON. ARNULF BRIAN B. FUENTEBELLA 15 LIBMANAN HON. MARILYN A. JIMENEZ 7 TINAMBAC HON. RUEL T. VELARDE 16 SAN FERNANDO HON. EUGENIO LAGASCA JR. 17 PAMPLONA HON. GEMINO IMPERIAL 5TH DISTRICT 18 MINALABAC HON. LEOVEGILDO BASMAYOR JR. 8 IRIGA CITY HON. MADELAINE Y. ALFELOR-GAZMEN 19 PASACAO HON. ASUNCION ARCEO 9 BAAO HON. MELQUIADES I. GAITE 20 MILAOR HON. ROGELIO A. FLORES 6
  • 7. BICOL REGION COMPARATIVE STATISTICAL DATA PROVINCE LAND AREA POPULATION (Km2) 2007 ALBAY 2,565.80 1,187,185 CAMARINES NORTE 2,320.10 513,785 * CAMARINES SUR 5,502.00 1,693,821 CATANDUANES 1,492.20 232,757 MASBATE 4,151.80 768,939 SORSOGON 2,119.00 709,673 *CamarinesSur is the largest province in the Bicol Region in terms of Land Area (30.23%) and Population (33.17%) Sources: LMB, NSCB &NSO 7
  • 8. PROFILE OF 1 4 CAMARINES 2 3 SUR 5 PARTICULARS CY 2010 NO. OF TOWNS 35 NO. OF CITIES (Iriga-component, Naga- chartered) 2 NO. OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 5 NO. OF BARANGAYS 1,036 POPULATION 1,693,821 8
  • 9. LEGAL BASIS OF HB NO. 4820 1. Article X, Section 10 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. 2. Section 461 of R.A. 7160 - 1991 Local Government Code
  • 10. Article X, Section 10 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution No province xxx may be xxxDIVIDEDxxx or its boundary substantially altered, EXCEPT in accordance with the CRITERIA established in the LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE and subject to approval by a majority of the votes cast in a PLEBISCITE in the political units DIRECTLY AFFECTED.
  • 11. SECTION 461 OF R.A. 7160 1991 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE 1. Average income for the last two years of not less than P20M, based on 1991 CPI (present value = P65M); -and either- 2. Population of not less than 250,000; -or- 3. Land area of not less tha 2,000 sq. km. PROVIDED: 1. The division does not reduce the income population, or land area of the LGU to less than the minimum requirements of this Code; and 2. The income classification of the original LGU shall not fall below its current classification prior to such division.
  • 12. LEGAL COMPLIANCE OF HB NO. 4820 TO SECTION 461 OF RA 7160 (1991 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE)
  • 13. COMPLIANCE OF H.B. 4820 TO SECTION 461 OF R.A. 7160 BLGF CERTIFICATION – MARCH 10, 2011 NSO CERTIFICATION - MARCH 07, 2011 LMB CERTIFICATION - APRIL 07, 2011 PARTICULARS REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE CAMARINES SUR NUEVA (MOTHER PROVINCE) CAMARINES DISTS. 1,2&3 (NEW PROVINCE) DISTS 4 & 5 AVE. INCOME (1991 CPI) P20.0 M P283.48 M P223.4 M AND EITHER (2010=P65M) POPULATION OR 250,000 892,203 801,618 LAND AREA (sq. km.) 2,000 2,531.60 2,970.4013
  • 14. BLGF COMPUTATION OF THE AVERAGE ANNUAL INCOME TO COMPUTE FOR THE AVE. ANNUAL INCOME FOR 2009 & 2010, THE 2009 & 2010 INCOME SHOULD BE DEFLATED BASED ON 1991 CPI THE DEFLATORS WERE ARRIVED AS FOLLOWS: 1991 CPI(2000 as base year) = 53.60 2009 CPI(2000 as base year) = 160.00 2010 CPI(2000 as base year) = 166.10 2009 DEFLATOR = 160.00/53.60 = 2.985 2010 DEFLATOR = 166.10/53.60 = 3.099 14
  • 15. INCOME CLASSIFICATION To compute income classification: Get actual income last 4 years (2007-2010) Get the average then compare with income brackets INCOME CLASSIFICATION BRACKET OF PROVINCES 1ST CLASS – P450.0 M OR MORE 2ND CLASS – P360.0 M TO P 450.0 M 3RD CLASS – P270.0 M TO P360.0 M 4TH CLASS – P180.0 M TO P270.0 M 5TH CLASS – P90.0 M TO P180.0 M 6TH CLASS – BELOW P90.0 15
  • 16. MOTHER PROVINCE REMAINS AS A FIRST CLASS PROVINCE SECTION 461 OF R.A. 7160 MANDATES THAT THE INCOME CLASSIFICATION OF MOTHER PROVINCE IS NOT REDUCED YEAR INCOME 2007 P 567,475,416.64 2008 P 671,207,205.49 2009 P 848,188,234.55 1ST CLASS 2010 P 848,088,883.09 PER DOF DO TOTALS P 2,934,959,739.09 NO. 23-08 DTD 7/29/09 DIVIDED BY 4 YEARS AVE. INCOME P 733,739,934.94 P450M Average BLGF Certification dated March 10, 2011 Income for 4 yrs 16
  • 17. NUEVA CAMARINES AS A SEPARATE PROVINCE MAY ALSO BECOME A FIRST CLASS PROVINCE YEAR COMPUTED INCOME 2007 P 478,288,701.38 2008 P 548,315,572.68 2009 P 648,611,023.38 2010 P 689,675,196.63 1ST CLASS PER DOF DO TOTALS P 2,364,890,494.07 NO. 23-08 DIVIDED BY 4 YEARS DTD 7/29/09 AVE. INCOME P 591,222,623.52 P450M Average BLGF Certification dated March 10, 2011 Income for 4 17 yrs
  • 18. COMPARATIVE DATA ON NEW & ORIGINAL (MOTHER) PROVINCE PARTICULARS MOTHER PROVINCE NUEVA CAMARINES DISTS 1,2&3 DISTS. 4 & 5 NO. TOWNS 19 + NAGA CITY 16 + IRIGA CITY POPULATION 892,203 801,618 LAND AREA (sq. km.) 2,531.60 2,970.40 AVE. INCOME (1991 CPI) P283.5 M P223.4 M INCOME CLASSIFICATION P733.7 M-1ST CLASS P591.2 M-1ST CLASS COMPUTED RESULTING INCOME (AVERAGE FOUR YEARS INCOME) CLASSIFICATION 2010 REGULAR INCOME P 848.1 M P 689.7 M BLGF CERTIFICATION – MARCH 10, 2011 NSO CERTIFICATION - MARCH 07, 2011 1 LMB CERTIFICATION - APRIL 07, 2011 3 4 2 MOTHER NUEVA PROVINCE 5 CAMARINES Dists. 1,2, & 3 Dists. 4 & 5 18
  • 19. RATIONALE FOR PROPOSING TO CREATE A NEW PROVINCE 1 3 4 2 MOTHER NUEVA PROVINCE 5 CAMARINES Dists. 1,2, & 3 Dists. 4 & 5 1. GOOD GOVERNANCE 2. POVERTY INCIDENCE 19
  • 20. INDICATORS IN DETERMINING GOOD GOVERNANCE • ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE INDEX • POLITICAL GOVERNANCE INDEX • ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE INDEX A. EDUCATION INDEX B. HEALTH INDEX C. POWER AND ICT INDEX 20
  • 21. PER NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD (NSCB) ANALYSIS, THE FOLLOWING ARE INDICATORS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE • ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE INDEX • Total Financial Resources Generated Per Capita • Per Capita Tax and Non-Tax • Per Capita Total Deposits • Per Capita Expenditure on Social Services • Unemployment Rate • Underemployment Rate • Inflation Rate • Poverty Gap • Poverty Incidence
  • 22. INDICATORS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE (C0NTINUED) • POLITICAL GOVERNANCE INDEX •Crime Solution Efficiency Rate •Voter’s Turnout Rate • ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE INDEX A. EDUCATION INDEX • Elementary Teacher to Pupil Ratio • High School Teacher to student Ratio • No. of Public Elem. Sch. per 1000 School Age population • No. of Public High Sch. per 1000 School Age pop’n
  • 23. INDICATORS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE (C0NTINUED) A. EDUCATION INDEX (continued) • Enrolment in Gov’t. Elem Sch per 1000 Sch. Age Pop’n • Enrolment in Gov’t. HS Sch per 1000 Sch. Age Pop’n • Elementary Pupil-Classroom Ratio • High School Pupil-Classroom Ratio B. HEALTH INDEX – Total Health Personnel per 1000 Population – % Birth less than 2500 grams – % Of Household with access to safe water – Barangay Health Station per 100,000 Population C. POWER AND ICT INDEX – Power Index/Electrification – ICT Index (Telephone Density per 1000 Population)
  • 24. IN DETERMINING POVERTY LEVEL 1. AN ANNUAL FAMILY INCOME OF PhP16,000 and below is classified as “poor” 24
  • 25. PRESENT OUTLOOK OF CAMARINES SUR  CAMARINES SUR IS AMONG THE BIGGEST PROVINCES IN THE COUNTRY. IT’S LAND AREA IS 5,502 SQUARE KM WHICH IS ALMOST AS BIG AS THE PROVINCES OF ILOCOS NORTE AND ILOCOS SUR COMBINED (6,100 SQUARE KM)  RANKS SECOND TO THE LOWEST IN GOOD GOVERNANCE (78TH OUT OF 79 PROVINCES) MAGUINDANAO BEING THE 79TH.  2ND TO THE HIGHEST POVERTY INCIDENCE IN BICOL REGION AND THIRD OVER ALL IN THE MAGNITUDE OF POOR FAMILIES IN THE PHILIPPINES 25
  • 26. MAGNITUDE OF THE AREA OF THE PROVINCE • Camarines Sur has 1,036 Barangays • There is only 365 DAYS in a year • It will take more than 3 years to visit all barangays 26
  • 27. SMALL AND BIG PROVINCES COMPARED NSCB, 2011 GGI Provinces POVERTY SMALLER Area Pop’n, (79 - which have CLUSTER/ PROVINCES FROM (km2) 2007 INCIDENCE worst) decided to IlocosNorte Ilocos 3,504 547,284 5/12.4% 24 divide in the Ilocos Sur Ilocos 2,596 632,255 4/ 17.0% 12 past have done QUIRINO N.Viscaya 2,323 397,837 4/ 12.3% 14 much better in SIQUIJOR Negros Or. 337 87,695 2/ 38.0% 2 terms of good AURORA Quezon 3,147 187,802 3/ 24.2% 17 governance, BILIRAN Leyte 536 150,031 2/ 34.9% 15 poverty GUIMARAS Iloilo 604 151,238 4/ 20.5% 38 alleviation, and KALINGA Kalinga A. 3,231 103,633 3/ 25.9% 3 in governing CAMIGUIN Misamis Or. 237 81,293 2/ 44.6% 1 their economic, BIG PROV. MASBATE Sorsogon 4,151 768,939 1/54.2% 76 political and Ambos administrative CAM SUR Cam 5,502 1,693,821 1/ 47.0% 78 affairs. QUEZON 9,069 1,646,510 3/ 32.5% 74 LEYTE 6,515 1,722,036 3/ 34.3% 77 The state of poverty in divided provinces was much 27 better than in Cam Sur.
  • 28. Negative consequences of “BIGNESS” - Public Finance Institute of the Philippines, Headed byAIM President and former Sec. of Finance Hon. Roberto De Ocampo  Difficulty of establishing accountability.  Too many people involved  Residents are at a loss on who is doing what and how redress can be sought when public service is badly delivered.  The absence of accountability induces under- performance, abuse of powers, and inefficiencies, and corruption. 28
  • 29. BIGGER LGUsDON’T NECESSARILY MEAN BETTER The Province of Rizal which was broken into smaller local government units and was not merely fragmented into 2 or 3 separate and independent LGUs, but 15 LGUs, namely: 1. Las Pińas 6. Malabon 11. Makati 2. Parańaque 7. Navotas 12. Pasay 3. Muntinglupa 8. Pasig 13. Mandaluyong 4. Taguig 9. Marikina 14. Quezon City 5. Pateros 10.Caloocan 15. San Juan The Province of Rizal did not lose its financial viability and its socio-economic growth stunted. 29
  • 30. LOGODEF STUDY • The primordial concern of the Local Government Code in establishing the minimum standards for creating a new province is to establish a local government system that is capable of local governance and local development. Said minimum standards should not be ignored because that would be anathema to the long-term foundation of robust central-local government relations for development. • The provisions of the Local Government Code establishing criteria or requisites for creation of a new province “CANNOT BE INTERPRETED TO MEAN THAT BIGGER LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE BETTER AND MORE VIABLE MECHANISM FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE”. 30
  • 31. Camarines Sur is poorly governed -- compared to its regional peers and the entire country • Compared to the 79 provinces in the Philippines, Camarines Sur is ranked 78 in good governance in 2008, down by two ranks compared to 2006 (NSCB, 2011) • “Compared to its regional peers,Cam Sur is the worst- run province in the entire Bicol region.”(Prof. Ben Diokno, UP School of Economics, former DBM Secretary) 31
  • 32. Poverty incidence and the number of poor people increase in CamarinesSur at rates higher than the national average In 2009, poverty Poverty Magnitude of Poor Change incidence in Incidence People Cam Sur was 2006 2009 2006 2009 % No. 47.0, higher than the national Philippines 26.4 26.5 22,173,190 23,142,481 4.4 969,291 average of 26.5 Region V 45.2 45.1 2,335,684 2,422,267 3.7 86,583 and regional Albay 42.8 43.6 512,762 512,079 -0.1 -683 average of 45.1. Cam Norte 41.5 42.3 215,911 232,685 7.8 16,774 Except for Masbate, its Cam Sur 44.9 47.0 760,730 794,832 4.5 34,102 other provincial Catanduanes 44.3 28.5 99,457 66,801 -32.8 -32,656 peers in the Masbate 52 54.2 425,966 441,688 3.7 15,722 Bicol region had Sorsogon 44.9 41.3 320,858 374,183 16.6 53,325 addressed poverty much From 2006 to 2009, the number of poor people better. in Cam Sur increased by 2% or by 34,102. 32
  • 33. Cebu, Negros Occidental and Camarines Sur continue to have the biggest share in the total number of poor families 33
  • 34. Economic Arguments by: Prof. Benjamin Diokno, UP School of Economics, former DBM Secretary The body of evidence is that Camarines Sur is not governed well and it has not addressed the welfare of its constituents. The dissatisfaction with the present state of affairs explains the clamor for an alternative province (Nueva Camarines). This bill will give those who are against the present state of affairs the right to ‘vote with their feet’ [a phrase coined by Charles M. Tiebout in his seminal article “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy 64(October 1956), pp. 416-4240] 34
  • 35. 35
  • 36. 36
  • 37. 37
  • 38. 38
  • 39. HOW DID CAMSUR PROVINCIAL GOV’T SPEND TAXPAYERS MONEY IN 2010? PARTICULARS TOTALS Casuals P 33,571,232.93 Consultancy 22,304,821.10 General Services 120,385,877.69 Other Professional Services 10,460,241.46 Gas, Oil & Lubricants 35,625,319.03 Donations 90,815,330.71 Confidential Expense 40,000,000.00 Food Supplies 97,775,981.28 Security 22,304,821.10 Other Supplies 30,068,549.91 Advertising 4,390,957.64 Drugs and Medicine Expense 133,547.13 Medical, Dental & Laboratory Supplies 97,664.15 39
  • 40. DISCRETIONARY FUNDS OF THE GOVERNOR GOVERNOR’S OTHER PARTICULARS OFFICE PROVINCIAL TOTALS OFFICES Casuals P 6,000,000.00 P P 33,476,000.00 27,476,000.00 Consultancy 5,000,000.00 21,570,000.00 16,570,000.00 General Services 10,676,201.30 41,190,308.00 51,866,509.30 Other Prof. Services 2,000,000.00 6,619,500.00 8,619,500.00 Other MOOE 6,049,500.00 174,003,913.96 180,053,413.96 Donations 6,967,032.32 65,897,515.52 72,864,547.84 Confidential Expense 30,000,000.00 2,368,932.00 32,368,932.00 Intelligence Expenses 25,685,697.00 2,000,000.00 27,685,697.00 TOTAL DICRETIONARY P92,378,430.62 P336,126,169.48 P428,504,600.10 FUNDS OF THE GOV 40
  • 41. BREAKDOWN OF SPECIAL PURPOSE APPROPRIATION (PROVINCIAL ENGINEER’S OFFICE) Particulars Amount % R&M-Office Buildings, School Buildings, Hospitals & 205,000.00 0.10% Health Centers, Other Structures, Office Equipment, Motor Vehicles, Highways and Bridges R&M-Other Public Infrastructure 18,000,000.00 8.43% Construction-School Buildings 10,000,000.00 4.68% Construction-Other Infrastructure 130,900,000.00 61.31% Construction-Other Public Infra 30,000,000.00 14.05% Gasoline, Oil and Lubricants 10,000,000.00 4.68% Land Improvements 1,000,000.00 0.47% Procurement-Motor Vehicle,IT Equipment & Software, 3,100,000.00 1.45% Technical & Scientific Machinery &Eqpt, & Other PPE Others 10,302,515.57 4.83% Total Special Purpose Appropriation (PEO) 213,507,515.57 OUT OF 213 M SPECIAL PURPOSE APPROPRIATION, 188 M OR 88% WAS USED ON OTHER PURPOSES WHICH PRACTICALLY AMOUNTS TO AN ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUND
  • 42. NEGLECT OF BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE THE CY 2011 SPECIAL PURPOSE APPROPRIATION OF P213.5 MILLION UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL ENGINEER ALLOTED A MEASLY P205 THOUSAND FOR REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE OF:  OFFICE BUILDING P 1,000.00  SCHOOL BUILDINGS P 1,000.00  HOSPITALS & HEALTH CTR P 1,000.00  OTHER STRUCTURES P 1,000.00  OFFICE EQUIPMENT P 500.00  MOTOR VEHICLES P 500.00  HIGHWAYS & BRIDGES P 200,000.00
  • 43. NEGLECT OF AGRICULTURE THE CY 2011 BUDGET OF P41.4 MILLION OF THE OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL AGRICULTURIST ALLOTED A MEASLY P1.24 MILLION FOR THE FOLLOWING:  AGRICULTURAL MACHINERIES P 30,000.00  AGRI, FISHERY & FORESTRY EQPT P 50,000.00  OTHER MACHINERIES & EQPT P 10,000.00  OTHER PROPERTY, PLANT & EQPT P 50,000.00  ANIMAL/ZOOLOGICAL SUPPLIES P 1,000,000.00  AGRICULTURE & MARINE SUPPLIES P 100,000.00
  • 44. NEGLECT OF HEALTH SERVICES Budget Allocation Per Person for CY 2011 Total Budget MDL Food Drugs MDL Cooking Population /Pax Eqpt Supplies &Meds Supplies Gas Camarines Sur 1,435,322 2.45 0.06 0.56 0.90 0.88 0.07 HOSPITALS Provincial Health Office 62,024 5.16 0.32 - 1.61 3.22 - LibmananDistrict 92,839 4.10 0.05 1.35 1.45 1.08 0.17 PartidoDistrict 35,768 12.76 0.14 4.75 4.19 3.40 0.28 Ragay District 47,743 10.03 0.21 3.35 3.14 3.14 0.19 SipocotDistrict 57,861 5.76 0.09 1.73 2.07 1.73 0.14 CaramoanMunicipal 39,642 8.00 0.13 2.52 2.65 2.52 0.18 OcampoDistrict 36,316 8.31 0.06 1.10 3.30 3.44 0.41 San Ramon Community 97,983 0.97 0.02 0.05 0.51 0.36 0.03 SirumaCommunity 17,035 11.45 0.29 0.88 4.70 4.70 0.88 Garchitorena Medicare 24,825 10.84 0.20 2.42 4.03 4.03 0.16 TinambacMunicipal 59,125 3.97 0.17 0.34 1.69 1.69 0.08 BuhiCommunity 70,765 1.98 0.07 0.07 1.13 0.64 0.07 PresentacionMunicipal 20,266 - - - - - -
  • 45. CONCLUSION 1. THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; 2. THE PROCESS OF CONSULTATION WAS FULLY OBSERVED; 45
  • 46. CONCLUSION 3. THE OLD CAMARINES SUR HAS BEEN TRYING UNSUCCESSFULLY TO COPE WITH THE PROBLEMS AND NEEDS OF A LARGE AREA (5,502 SQ. KM), AND A BIG NUMBER OF POPULATION (1,693,821), TOWNS (35), CITY (1) AND BARANGAYS (1,036) (EXCLUDING NAGA CITY); 46
  • 47. CONCLUSION 4. THE TWO EMERGING PROVINCES WILL DEVELOP AN AREA ROUGHLY 50% OF THE OLD PROVINCE AND SEE TO THE NEEDS OF ALSO ROUGHLY 50% OF ITS POPULATION; 47
  • 48. CONCLUSION 5. THE FUNDS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO BOTH EMERGING PROVINCES WILL BE MORE THAN THAT OF THE OLD (WHOLE) PROVINCE IN TERMS OF PER CAPITA AND PER SQUARE KM. 48
  • 49. CONCLUSION 6. IT IS NOT TRUE THAT DIVIDING A PROVINCE WEAKENS BOTH NEW PROVINCES AS CAN BE SEEN IN THE FIGURES BELOW: REGULAR INCOME INCOME CLASS MOTHER PROVINCE FIRST CLASS – CAMARINES SUR P848.1 M (DIST 1,2&3) NUEVA CAMARINES MAY BECOME (DIST 4&5) P689.7 M BLGF:RESULTING FIRST CLASS COMPUTED INCOME 49
  • 50. CONCLUSION 7. DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS WILL BE FOCUSED ON SMALLER AREA AND FEWER LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS; SERVICES WILL BE DELIVERED TO FEWER POPULATION. 50
  • 51. CONCLUSION 8. THE CREATION OF THE PROVINCE OF NUEVA CAMARINES WILL ACCELERATE THE POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL GREATLY BENEFIT NOT ONLY THE PEOPLE IN THE PROPOSED PROVINCE, BUT ALSO THOSE IN THE MOTHER PROVINCE OF CAMARINES SUR, NOT TO MENTION THE ENTIRE COUNTRY. 51
  • 52. IN SUMMARY THE CREATION OF NUEVA CAMARINES SHALL BRING ABOUT BETTER GOVERNANCE AND IMPROVED ECONOMIC PROSPECTS WHICH COULD LEAD TO REDUCTION IN POVERTY INCIDENCE. ERGO ACCELERATED ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE TWO CAMARINES PROVINCES (CAMARINES SUR AND NUEVA CAMARINES) 52
  • 53. THANK YOU 53

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Insert National and Bicol Map to show location of Camsur
  2. Grp small and big provinces in this slide. Inludeilocos provinces in grp of small, area and population
  3. Headed by AIM Pres and former Sec of Finance Hon. Roberto De Ocampo