SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 54
Download to read offline
Brand Engagement Index
                  2012
                DECEMBER 2012
– Management & research objectives

           – Methodology

 Report    – Executive summary

Overview   – Meaning of brands

           – Measuring eNgagement

           – The four I’s

           – TOP 10

           – Media exposure

           – Category results
Management &
Research Objectives
Management & Research Objectives

                         Develop a research tool to measure Brand eNgagement and the related I’s.

                         Rank 116 brands based on their Brand eNgagement score amongst Belgian
                         consumers.



    To support this mission, NBBDO is looking to operationalize the eNgagement concept in a
     quantitative survey that can be used…
      –   … to rank a set of 116 brands based on their eNgagement performance
      –   … to offer to its clients as a customized research tool in future projects
    The outcome of this project will be threefold:
      –   Master survey that measures Brand eNgagement
      –   Model that shows the relationship between the four I’s, Brand eNgagement and business KPI’s
      –   Ranking of 116 brands based on their eNgagement performance




                                                             5
Methodology
Methodology

    Research method
     –   Online survey
     –   Recruitment via InSites’ Talktochange consumer panel
     –   Field: 11/10/2012 – 23/10/2012
     –   Survey length: 18 minutes
     –   Sample:
          •   N(Respondents) = 2.331
          •   N(Brand evaluations) = 11.100
    Screening & quota
    Screening:
     – Age between 18-45
     – Not active in danger occupations
    Quota:
       – Language: Dutch (60%) – French(40%)
              •   Gender: Male (50%) – Female (50%)
                     –   Age: 18-24 years (24%) – 25-34 years (36%) – 35-45 years (40%)




                                                         7
Meaning of brands
Associations
     Q: To what extent do you agree with the following statements?.




                                                                                                                                                                 2012 2011 2010
    I expect brands to have a high value for money                                54%                                          29%                 14%     2%    84%   86%   94%

         Brands need the input of their consumers                     26%                                48%                                23%           2%     74%   74%   79%

        Brands should be close to their consumers                18%                               50%                                     27%            3%
                                                                                                                                                           1%    69%   70%   74%
      Brands should involve their consumers in the
                                                                 19%                              46%                                 29%                5%2%    65%   65%   71%
       development of new products and services

                                Brands are attractive        13%                            48%                                      31%                 6% 3%   61%   61%   63%
    Brands should involve their consumers in their
        communication efforts (campaigns...)
                                                            11%                       42%                                       38%                     7% 2%    53%   51%   51%

                        Brands can make us dream              15%                       37%                                    34%                 10%     4%    52%   51%   48%

                Branded products are more reliable          9%                      39%                                   35%                     13%      4%    49%   48%   55%

   Brands bring products closer to their consumers         8%                     39%                                      42%                         8% 3%     47%   48%   42%
I find branded products more attractive than private
                       labels
                                                            11%                    35%                               34%                         15%      6%     46%   48%   50%

     Brands have to actively communicate with me            9%                  33%                                      45%                       11%     3%    41%   42%   39%

        Brands are a means to feel more confident          7%               28%                              36%                       19%               9%      35%   37%   33%

      Brands make people interact with each other          7%               29%                                    47%                            14%      3%    35%   34%   27%
                                                     Totally agree          Rather agree           Neutral         Rather disagree           Totally disagree

        N =2331
                                                                            Sign. difference (95%)




                                                                                                   9
Brand Engagement
The model
Influence on KPI’s
        There are very strong correlations between brand engagement and all KPI’s.
        Brand engagement can predict 37% to 48% of the KPI’s.
        Likeability and loyalty can be best predicted by engagement, uniqueness is
        somewhat less predictable by engagement towards the brand

                                                                                      Likeability    r² = 0,42

    Intimacy
                                                                        r = 0,65
                                                                                        Loyalty      r² = 0,48


                                                                        r = 0,70
  Involvement
                                  Brand                                              Consideration
                                                                        r = 0,65                     r² = 0,42
                                eNgagement
                                   Index
                                                                        r = 0,65
   Interaction
                                                                                       Purchase
                                                                                                     r² = 0,42
                                                                                       intention

                            The BEI (Brand                              r = 0,61
                            eNgagement Index) is a
   Influence                score on 100, consisting of
                            the scores on the four                                   Uniqueness      r² = 0,37
                            dimensions of engagement




                                                          11
Recommendation
    Reasons
  Q: You said you would recommend this brand to others. Please indicate why you would recommend this brand to others?
  Q: Can you think of other things that would trigger you to recommend this brand to others?




My personal experience with this brand triggers me to
                                                                                                        46%
         recommend this brand to others

             My price/quality perception of this brand                                              44%


              The products and services of this brand                                             40%


                                   I just love the brand                                    35%


                       The promotions from the brand                              24%


      This brand puts a lot of efforts in its consumers                    17%

 The buzz (campaigns, events, etc.) about this brand
                                                                     9%
               triggers me to do so

                             The mission of this brand               9%


    The activities from the company behind the brand                 8%


                                         None of these          5%




     N =4458 / F= Only if they would recommend the brand




                                                                                         12
No recommendation
  Reasons
Q: You said you would not recommend this brand to others. Please indicate why you would not recommend this brand to others?
Q: Can you think of other things that prevents you from recommending this brand to others?




                           I just don’t love the brand                               28%


           My price/quality perception of this brand                      17%

My personal experience with this brand triggers me
                                                                          16%
     to not recommend this brand to others

           The products and services of this brand                      13%

       This brand does not put a lot of efforts in its
                                                                   8%
                      consumers

           The (lack of) promotions from the brand                 7%

The lack of activities from the company behind the
                                                               6%
                         brand

                           The mission of this brand           5%

     The buzz (campaigns, events, etc.) about this
                                                              4%
          brand does not trigger me to do so

                                       None of these                                        35%




   N =2548 / F= Only if they would not recommend the brand




                                                                                       13
The 4 I’s




            14
Sectors with lower & higher
               engagement
                     DECEMBER 2012
▸ low engagement categories (52 – 53,9)
  - Energy – Dairy – Margarines - Beer
▸ Medium engagement categories (54 – 56,5)
  - Water - Automotive – Magazines – Juices – Banks – CSD
    – Coffee – Chocolate snacks
▸ High engagement categories (57 – 61,4)
  - Salty snacks – cellphones – telecom – retail
Low engagement
         DECEMBER 2012
The 4 I’s
Energy

               Energy
                 Intimacy
                70%

                60%

                50%

                40%

                30%

                20%

                10%

   Influence     0%                Involvment




                                                Electrabel

                                                Luminus

                                                Eneco

                                                Essent

                                                Lampiris

                Interaction                     Nuon

                                                Belpower




                              18
The 4 I’s
Dairy products

                 Dairy products
                       Intimacy
                      70%

                      60%

                      50%

                      40%

                      30%

                      20%

                      10%

    Influence          0%                Involvment

                                                      Campina

                                                      Joyvalle

                                                      Inex

                                                      Inza

                                                      Danone

                                                      Nestlé

                                                      Lactel
                      Interaction
                                                      Kraft




                                    19
The 4 I’s
Butter

                Butter
                  Intimacy
                 70%

                 60%

                 50%

                 40%

                 30%

                 20%

                 10%

    Influence     0%                Involvment


                                                 Solo

                                                 Planta

                                                 Bertolli

                                                 Becel

                                                 Alpro

                 Interaction




                               20
The 4 I’s
Beers

               Beers
                Intimacy
               70%

               60%

               50%

               40%

               30%

               20%

               10%

   Influence    0%                Involvment
                                               Stella Artois
                                               Jupiler
                                               Maes
                                               Duvel
                                               Palm
                                               Vedett
                                               Hoegaarden
                                               Leffe

               Interaction




                             21
Medium engagement
            DECEMBER 2012
The 4 I’s
Water

               Water
                Intimacy
               70%

               60%

               50%

               40%

               30%

               20%

               10%

   Influence    0%                Involvment

                                               Spa

                                               Perrier

                                               Vittel

                                               BRU

                                               Contrex

                                               Chaudfontaine
               Interaction                     Evian




                             23
The 4 I’s
Cars

               Cars
                Intimacy
               70%

               60%

               50%

               40%

               30%

               20%

               10%

   Influence    0%                Involvment



                                               Volvo

                                               Mercedes

                                               BMW

                                               Audi

                                               Volkswagen

               Interaction                     MINI

                                               Toyota




                             24
The 4 I’s
Magazines

               Magazines
                  Intimacy
                 70%

                 60%

                 50%

                 40%

                 30%

                 20%

                 10%

   Influence      0%                Involvment


                                                 Dag Allemaal
                                                 Humo
                                                 Libelle
                                                 Story
                                                 Flair
                                                 P-magazine
                                                 Feeling
                 Interaction                     Goed Gevoel
                                                 Knack
                                                 TV Familie
                                                 Vitaya

                               25
The 4 I’s
Fruit juices

                Fruit juices
                    Intimacy
                   70%

                   60%

                   50%

                   40%

                   30%

                   20%

                   10%

    Influence       0%                Involvment




                                                   Minute Maid

                                                   Appelsientje

                                                   Looza

                                                   Materne

                                                   Sunland

                   Interaction                     Capri Sun

                                                   Tropicana




                                 26
The 4 I’s
Banks

               Banks
                Intimacy
                70%

                60%

                50%

                40%

                30%

                20%

                10%

   Influence    0%                Involvment
                                               KBC

                                               Belfius

                                               ING

                                               BNP Paribas
                                               Fortis
                                               Argenta

                                               AXA



               Interaction




                             27
The 4 I’s
Cola

               Cola
                Intimacy
               70%

               60%

               50%

               40%

               30%

               20%

               10%

   Influence    0%                Involvment




                                               Coca-Cola

                                               Coca-Cola
                                               light
                                               Pepsi

                                               Pepsi Max

                                               River
               Interaction
                                               Lidl Cola




                             28
The 4 I’s
Coffee

                Coffee
                  Intimacy
                 70%

                 60%

                 50%

                 40%

                 30%

                 20%

                 10%

    Influence     0%                Involvment




                                                 Douwe
                                                 Egberts
                                                 Illy

                                                 Nespresso

                                                 Dolce Gusto

                                                 Jacqmotte
                 Interaction
                                                 Nescafé




                               29
The 4 I’s
Chocolate

                Chocolate
                   Intimacy
                  70%

                  60%

                  50%

                  40%

                  30%

                  20%

                  10%

    Influence      0%                Involvment




                                                  Mars
                                                  Snickers
                                                  M&Ms
                                                  Leo
                                                  KitKat
                  Interaction                     Twix
                                                  Maltesers
                                                  Côte dOr
                                                  KinderBueno
                                                  Milka
                                30
High engagement
          DECEMBER 2012
The 4 I’s
Retail

                Retail
                 Intimacy
                70%

                60%

                50%

                40%

                30%

                20%

                10%

    Influence    0%                Involvment




                                                Delhaize

                                                Carrefour

                                                Colruyt

                                                Lidl

                                                Aldi
                Interaction
                                                Makro




                              32
The 4 I’s
Telco

                Telco
                 Intimacy
                70%

                60%

                50%

                40%

                30%

                20%

                10%

    Influence    0%                Involvment

                                                Belgacom

                                                Proximus

                                                Mobistar

                                                Base

                                                Telenet

                                                Mobile Vikings
                Interaction                     VOO




                              33
The 4 I’s
Cellphones

               Cellphones
                   Intimacy
                  70%

                  60%

                  50%

                  40%

                  30%

                  20%

                  10%

   Influence       0%                Involvment
                                                  Nokia
                                                  Sony
                                                  Samsung
                                                  Apple
                                                  HTC
                                                  BlackBerry
                                                  LG


                  Interaction




                                34
The 4 I’s
Salty snacks

                Salty snacks
                     Intimacy
                    70%

                    60%

                    50%

                    40%

                    30%

                    20%

                    10%

    Influence        0%                Involvment


                                                    Lays

                                                    Smiths

                                                    Croky

                                                    TUC

                                                    Pringles

                    Interaction




                                  35
The 4 I’s
     Salty snacks
                                                             2012             2011             2010

                                                                                                                    52%
                 This brand is present in places that I frequently visit                                           50%
                                                                                                            43%

                                                                                                                                  ntimacy
                                                                                                   30%
                      This brand is very much present in my daily life                               34%
                                                                                                   31%
This brand succeeds in reaching me as it is present at the right place                                    40%
                                                                                                            44%
                     and at the right moment                                                           36%



                                                                                            23%
                                        I feel involved with this brand                      25%
                                                                                         18%
                                                                                         18%
                   I feel involved in the actions this brand undertakes
                                                                                    11%
                                                                                         18%
                                                                                                                                  nvolvement
                                                                                        17%
                 This brand involves me in its communication efforts                  14%
                                                                                  8%



                                                                                             24%
                     This brand stimulates conversations about itself                         25%
                                                                                           19%
 This brand stimulates interaction with its users by organizing things                        25%
                 that fit to their consumers lifestyles
                                                                                           20%
                                                                                         17%                                      nteraction
     By evoking buzz (campaigns, events, etc) this brand induces a                             26%
                                                                                               26%
                       dialogue between consumers                                         18%



                                                                                                                          61%
                              I would recommend the brand to others                                                         66%
                                                                                            23%
                                                                                            23%
                 I have recently spoken about this brand to someone                        22%
                                                                                          20%
                                                                                         18%
                                                                                                                                  nfluence
           The brand has triggered me to join conversations about it                     18%
                                                                                       15%


                                                                     Sign. difference compared to last year 95%)




                                                                                         36
4 I’s score for Lays (2010-2011-2012)




                              Intimacy
                            80

                            60                   2010
                                                 2011
                            40
                                                 2012
                            20

     Influence                0            Involvement




                             Interaction
Top 10
DECEMBER 2012
Top 10 2011
                       Overall
© InSites Consulting




                                     Brand eNgagement Index   39
Top 10 2011
                       Overall - Users
© InSites Consulting




                                     Counts below 30   Sign. difference (95%)   . = Not tested in 2010   Brand eNgagement Index   40
Top 10 2012
Overall

                                       In TOP10 2011                       Not in TOP 10
                                                                           (colruyt, delhaize
                                                                           en zero are new
                                                                           brands)




              No significance difference   41   . = Not tested this year
Top 10 2012
Overall users

                                         In TOP10 2011                       Not in TOP 10
                                                                             (eneco & colruyt
                                                                             are new brands)




                Sign. difference (95%)       42   . = Not tested this year
Media exposure
        DECEMBER 2012
Media exposure
  Above the line exposure
Q: On which of the following occoasions did you encounter the brands that are listed below?




                                                                  In printed media:
                                                              newspapers, magazines
                                     Radio spots                             On another website
                                                    On the website of the brand
         VARIANCE)




                                                                                                       On other social media
                                                   I have encountered the brand                        TV advertisements
                                                      in a conversation with a        Other           On Twitter                                             I have seen this brand in a
                                                        friend/family member                                                                                           store
                                                                                           On Pinterest
        DIMENSION 1 (11% EXPLAINED




                                                                  In the street: abri, billboard, etc.                         I have seen this brand at a
                                                                                                 In public places: flyers, street
                                                                                                                                      friend’s place
                                                                                                  animation, sampling, tasting,
                                                                                          On Facebook          etc

                                         Athletes that are sponsored by
                                                    the brand




                                                                 At sponsored
                                                                events/festivals                                                              Significant on dimension 1
                                                                                                                                              Significant on dimension 2
                                                                                                                                              Significant on both dimensions


                                                                                     DIMENSION 1 (65% EXPLAINED                 VARIANCE)




                                                                                                    44
Media exposure
 Q: On which of the following occoasions did you encounter the brands that are listed below?

                                                                            Choco-
                                       Auto-                      Cell-                               Distri-                   Maga-   Marga- Salty                       Dairy
                                              Banks      Beer                late  Coffee Coke                  Energy Juices                           Telco   Waters
                                       motive                    phones                               butie                     zines    rines snacks                    products
                                                                            snacks
TV advertisements                      66%      44%      41%       42%       63%      55%       49%   20%       42%     39%     38%     52%     52%     64%     59%       42%
In the street: abri, billboard, etc.   49%      38%      25%       25%       24%      26%       30%   26%       20%     18%     21%     13%     23%     44%     25%       14%
In printed media: newspapers,
                                     47%        43%      27%       32%       19%      28%       25%   39%       36%     20%     37%     23%     22%     44%     24%       20%
magazines
I have seen this brand at a friend’s
                                     39%        14%      45%       44%       35%      33%       47%   28%       11%     31%     40%     30%     48%     34%     31%       28%
place
I have seen this brand in a store      33%      10%      69%       55%       68%      61%       70%   51%        8%     70%     57%     72%     71%     35%     68%       69%
In a conversation with a
                                       31%      25%      22%       29%       13%      18%       23%   28%       20%     10%     19%     13%     13%     33%     15%        8%
friend/family member
On the website of the brand            25%      23%      10%       25%        9%      13%       12%   24%       18%     8%      14%      9%     14%     31%     10%        7%

Radio spots                            22%      31%      16%       7%        10%      11%       12%   17%       31%     8%      25%      7%     9%      39%      8%        8%

At sponsored events/festivals          20%      23%      27%       13%        7%       8%       26%    5%       10%     7%      11%      3%     11%     29%     13%        5%

In public places: flyers, street
                                       20%      17%      23%       14%       17%      19%       29%   20%       14%     16%     11%     13%     23%     29%     13%       15%
animation, sampling, tasting, etc.
Athletes that are sponsored
                                        9%      15%      5%        6%         3%       4%       11%    5%        7%     2%       3%      2%     4%      14%      7%        5%
by the brand
On Facebook                             9%      6%       7%        12%        7%       7%       10%    6%        5%     4%       7%      4%     8%      14%      5%        3%

On another website                      2%      3%       2%        3%         2%       2%       2%     2%        4%     1%       3%      2%     3%      4%       2%        2%

On Pinterest                            2%      2%       2%        3%         2%       1%       2%     2%        2%     1%       2%      1%     2%      2%       1%        1%
On Twitter                              2%      2%       2%        4%         2%      2%        3%     1%       2%      2%      3%      2%      3%      5%       2%        2%
On other social media                   2%      2%       2%        2%         2%      2%        2%     1%       2%      1%      2%      2%      3%      2%       1%        2%
Other                                   2%      4%       2%        1%         1%      3%        3%     2%       3%      1%      2%      2%      3%      3%       1%        3%
None of the above                      10%      14%      8%        13%        7%      10%       10%   12%       16%     10%     11%     10%     7%      7%       9%       11%




                                                                                           45
Categorie results
           DECEMBER 2012
Category results




                   47
Category results
Coke



                                                                                     TOP 3 among total
                       TOTAL                    USERS                 NON-USERS
                                                                                       1
                  2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012
                                                                                       2
     Average      52,7 53,8 56,5 54,5 55,3 57,7 35,6 38,7 44,2

                                                                                       3
    Coca Cola     66,2 68,1 70,1 66,2 68,8 70,2 60,0 26,7 63,3
    Cola Light    59,6 63,6 61,4 60,8 64,6 62,5 42,7 46,3 48,7
        Pepsi     50,2 53,8 54,7 51,0 54,5 55,1 40,4 46,8 49,8                       TOP 3 among users
    Pepsi Max     53,8 53,6 54,3 55,4 54,7 55,2 38,8 41,7 44,8
      Lidl cola   45,9 44,9 48,2 50,2 47,7 49,6 29,9 30,9 41,7                         1
    River cola    38,6 39,0 44,1 39,3 38,9 45,3 33,1 39,5 34,9
Coca-cola Zero     .     .     62,7        .          .        64,0   .   .   50,1     2

                                                                                       3


                                      Sign. difference (95%)




                                                               48
Executive summary
            DECEMBER 2012
Executive
Summary
Executive Summary
Conclusions



 • The overall feeling towards brands is consumers need to receive high value for
  money. In addition brands need to listen to their consumers. They should be
  close to their consumers and listen to their needs and even involve them in the
  development of new products and services.

 • These two characteristics are key for brand recommendation. A good
  price/quality perception and the personal experience are the main drivers of
  brand recommendation. There is no willingness to recommend when either
  these two characteristics are not present or there is no ‘love’ between the
  consumer and the brand (or its services/products).

 • This points out the importance to engage with consumers as a brand. The
  brand eNgagement index is a model to measure brand engagement. This model
  focuses on 4 dimensions: Involvement, Influence, Intimacy and Interaction.
  These dimensions explain the majority of the variance in the brand
  engagement index. The brand engagement index influences the brand KPIs
  such as likeability, loyalty, consideration, purchase intention and uniqueness.
Executive Summary
Conclusions



 • The brand eNgagement index (BEI) integrates the scores on each of the four
     dimensions and can reach a maximum score of 100.
 •   On a brand level Coca Cola, Colruyt, Apple, Samsung, Douwe Egberts, Cote
     D’or, Proximus, Telenet, Delhaize & Coke Zero are the best scoring brands out
     of the 116 evaluated brands. Four new brands came in the Top10, whereof two
     retailers : Colruyt and Delhaize. Coke Zero took the place of Coke Light. Unlike
     Telenet, last year n°2, just remained in the top 10. Among users only, Coca Cola
     and Apple perform well but smaller brands such as Mobile Vikings, Argenta and
     Eneco that are in the top.

 • On category level, the 3 best scoring categories are retail, telecom and
     cellphones.

 • Media exposure remains a driver of brand engagement. There is a direct
     positive effect on brands which have more exposure on their BEI score.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Sample Of Work (Brand, Communications & Research
Sample Of Work (Brand, Communications & ResearchSample Of Work (Brand, Communications & Research
Sample Of Work (Brand, Communications & Researchsumit76
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
[foresight research] Introduction to Brand Health Tracking
[foresight research] Introduction to Brand Health Tracking[foresight research] Introduction to Brand Health Tracking
[foresight research] Introduction to Brand Health TrackingDuy, Vo Hoang
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust BarometerEdelman APACMEA
 
brandshare China Results 2014
brandshare China Results 2014brandshare China Results 2014
brandshare China Results 2014Edelman APACMEA
 
brandshare Japan 2014
brandshare Japan 2014brandshare Japan 2014
brandshare Japan 2014Edelman Japan
 
brandshare: Financial Services Sector Results
brandshare: Financial Services Sector Resultsbrandshare: Financial Services Sector Results
brandshare: Financial Services Sector ResultsEdelman
 
Innovations in marketing effectiveness measurement v.2
Innovations in marketing effectiveness measurement v.2Innovations in marketing effectiveness measurement v.2
Innovations in marketing effectiveness measurement v.2Michael Wolfe
 
2008 Powered Roi Report Final
2008 Powered Roi Report Final2008 Powered Roi Report Final
2008 Powered Roi Report FinalRalph Paglia
 
Deriving measurable content drivers for effective Content Marketing
Deriving measurable content drivers for effective Content MarketingDeriving measurable content drivers for effective Content Marketing
Deriving measurable content drivers for effective Content MarketingMichael Wolfe
 
Studying the Link Between Volume of Media Coverage and Business Outcomes. 
Studying the Link Between Volume of Media Coverage and Business Outcomes.  Studying the Link Between Volume of Media Coverage and Business Outcomes. 
Studying the Link Between Volume of Media Coverage and Business Outcomes.  Udit Joshi
 
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social media
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social mediaMeasuring Customer-Experience ROI with social media
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social mediaMichael Wolfe
 
brandshareTM 2014 - Brazil
brandshareTM 2014 - BrazilbrandshareTM 2014 - Brazil
brandshareTM 2014 - BrazilEdelman
 
Achieving Personalization at Scale
Achieving Personalization at Scale Achieving Personalization at Scale
Achieving Personalization at Scale dunnhumby
 
An evaluation of the role of marketing strategies in developing brand equity ...
An evaluation of the role of marketing strategies in developing brand equity ...An evaluation of the role of marketing strategies in developing brand equity ...
An evaluation of the role of marketing strategies in developing brand equity ...Nevin Pillay
 
AdRoll-State-of-the-Industry-UK
AdRoll-State-of-the-Industry-UKAdRoll-State-of-the-Industry-UK
AdRoll-State-of-the-Industry-UKAishling Maguire
 
Store in-store models for retail expansion of local brands
Store in-store models for retail expansion of local brandsStore in-store models for retail expansion of local brands
Store in-store models for retail expansion of local brandsBrowne & Mohan
 
How B2B companies talk past their customers
How B2B companies talk past their customersHow B2B companies talk past their customers
How B2B companies talk past their customersAdfactors B2B
 
Member case study: Kantar Millward Brown - Delivering cost-effective incremen...
Member case study: Kantar Millward Brown - Delivering cost-effective incremen...Member case study: Kantar Millward Brown - Delivering cost-effective incremen...
Member case study: Kantar Millward Brown - Delivering cost-effective incremen...IAB Europe
 

What's hot (20)

Sample Of Work (Brand, Communications & Research
Sample Of Work (Brand, Communications & ResearchSample Of Work (Brand, Communications & Research
Sample Of Work (Brand, Communications & Research
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia
 
[foresight research] Introduction to Brand Health Tracking
[foresight research] Introduction to Brand Health Tracking[foresight research] Introduction to Brand Health Tracking
[foresight research] Introduction to Brand Health Tracking
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
 
brandshare China Results 2014
brandshare China Results 2014brandshare China Results 2014
brandshare China Results 2014
 
brandshare Japan 2014
brandshare Japan 2014brandshare Japan 2014
brandshare Japan 2014
 
17 Social Media Metrics For Better ROI
17 Social Media Metrics For Better ROI17 Social Media Metrics For Better ROI
17 Social Media Metrics For Better ROI
 
brandshare: Financial Services Sector Results
brandshare: Financial Services Sector Resultsbrandshare: Financial Services Sector Results
brandshare: Financial Services Sector Results
 
Innovations in marketing effectiveness measurement v.2
Innovations in marketing effectiveness measurement v.2Innovations in marketing effectiveness measurement v.2
Innovations in marketing effectiveness measurement v.2
 
2008 Powered Roi Report Final
2008 Powered Roi Report Final2008 Powered Roi Report Final
2008 Powered Roi Report Final
 
Deriving measurable content drivers for effective Content Marketing
Deriving measurable content drivers for effective Content MarketingDeriving measurable content drivers for effective Content Marketing
Deriving measurable content drivers for effective Content Marketing
 
Studying the Link Between Volume of Media Coverage and Business Outcomes. 
Studying the Link Between Volume of Media Coverage and Business Outcomes.  Studying the Link Between Volume of Media Coverage and Business Outcomes. 
Studying the Link Between Volume of Media Coverage and Business Outcomes. 
 
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social media
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social mediaMeasuring Customer-Experience ROI with social media
Measuring Customer-Experience ROI with social media
 
brandshareTM 2014 - Brazil
brandshareTM 2014 - BrazilbrandshareTM 2014 - Brazil
brandshareTM 2014 - Brazil
 
Achieving Personalization at Scale
Achieving Personalization at Scale Achieving Personalization at Scale
Achieving Personalization at Scale
 
An evaluation of the role of marketing strategies in developing brand equity ...
An evaluation of the role of marketing strategies in developing brand equity ...An evaluation of the role of marketing strategies in developing brand equity ...
An evaluation of the role of marketing strategies in developing brand equity ...
 
AdRoll-State-of-the-Industry-UK
AdRoll-State-of-the-Industry-UKAdRoll-State-of-the-Industry-UK
AdRoll-State-of-the-Industry-UK
 
Store in-store models for retail expansion of local brands
Store in-store models for retail expansion of local brandsStore in-store models for retail expansion of local brands
Store in-store models for retail expansion of local brands
 
How B2B companies talk past their customers
How B2B companies talk past their customersHow B2B companies talk past their customers
How B2B companies talk past their customers
 
Member case study: Kantar Millward Brown - Delivering cost-effective incremen...
Member case study: Kantar Millward Brown - Delivering cost-effective incremen...Member case study: Kantar Millward Brown - Delivering cost-effective incremen...
Member case study: Kantar Millward Brown - Delivering cost-effective incremen...
 

Similar to Brand Engagement Model & Study 2012

Michael Benson - Pazarlama Zirvesi 2012
Michael Benson - Pazarlama Zirvesi 2012Michael Benson - Pazarlama Zirvesi 2012
Michael Benson - Pazarlama Zirvesi 2012Pazarlama Zirvesi
 
Take Your Brand From Good To Great
Take Your Brand From Good To GreatTake Your Brand From Good To Great
Take Your Brand From Good To GreatKantar
 
MEC Meeting #4 - Summer Edition
MEC Meeting #4 - Summer EditionMEC Meeting #4 - Summer Edition
MEC Meeting #4 - Summer EditionRonald Velten
 
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc 2012
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc 2012Membership performance improvement seminar nyc 2012
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc 2012ASI
 
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc oct 2012
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc oct 2012Membership performance improvement seminar nyc oct 2012
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc oct 2012ASI
 
The State of Marketing 2012
The State of Marketing 2012The State of Marketing 2012
The State of Marketing 2012Allie Kelly
 
Marketreport 100809100201-phpapp01
Marketreport 100809100201-phpapp01Marketreport 100809100201-phpapp01
Marketreport 100809100201-phpapp01apymuamua
 
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report by Tony Rossell_Marketing_Gener...
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report by Tony Rossell_Marketing_Gener...2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report by Tony Rossell_Marketing_Gener...
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report by Tony Rossell_Marketing_Gener...Marketing General Incorporated (MGI)
 
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking ReportTony Rossell
 
Conquering The Omnichannel Arena
Conquering The Omnichannel ArenaConquering The Omnichannel Arena
Conquering The Omnichannel ArenaG3 Communications
 
Marketers’ and consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of branded content
Marketers’ and consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of branded contentMarketers’ and consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of branded content
Marketers’ and consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of branded contentNino Di Cara
 
Mobile is the glue of SoLoMo and ATAWAD
Mobile is the glue of SoLoMo and ATAWADMobile is the glue of SoLoMo and ATAWAD
Mobile is the glue of SoLoMo and ATAWADMobilosoft
 
Diagnosing And Solving Membership Marketing Challenges - Tony Rossell-mgi
Diagnosing And Solving Membership Marketing Challenges - Tony Rossell-mgiDiagnosing And Solving Membership Marketing Challenges - Tony Rossell-mgi
Diagnosing And Solving Membership Marketing Challenges - Tony Rossell-mgiMarketing General Incorporated (MGI)
 
Best practice in sales and marketing alignment
Best practice in sales and marketing alignment Best practice in sales and marketing alignment
Best practice in sales and marketing alignment B2B Marketing
 
Measuring Social ROI: The CIO's Role
Measuring Social ROI: The CIO's RoleMeasuring Social ROI: The CIO's Role
Measuring Social ROI: The CIO's RolePaul Gillin
 
The Challenge of todays CMO
The Challenge of todays CMOThe Challenge of todays CMO
The Challenge of todays CMORonald Velten
 
Customer Loyalty In The Oilfield Reputation
Customer Loyalty In The Oilfield ReputationCustomer Loyalty In The Oilfield Reputation
Customer Loyalty In The Oilfield ReputationEndeavor Management
 
7 effective strategies to use social media for your business
7 effective strategies to use social media for your business7 effective strategies to use social media for your business
7 effective strategies to use social media for your businessMilena Regos
 

Similar to Brand Engagement Model & Study 2012 (20)

Media Market Overview
Media Market OverviewMedia Market Overview
Media Market Overview
 
Michael Benson - Pazarlama Zirvesi 2012
Michael Benson - Pazarlama Zirvesi 2012Michael Benson - Pazarlama Zirvesi 2012
Michael Benson - Pazarlama Zirvesi 2012
 
Take Your Brand From Good To Great
Take Your Brand From Good To GreatTake Your Brand From Good To Great
Take Your Brand From Good To Great
 
MEC Meeting #4 - Summer Edition
MEC Meeting #4 - Summer EditionMEC Meeting #4 - Summer Edition
MEC Meeting #4 - Summer Edition
 
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc 2012
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc 2012Membership performance improvement seminar nyc 2012
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc 2012
 
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc oct 2012
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc oct 2012Membership performance improvement seminar nyc oct 2012
Membership performance improvement seminar nyc oct 2012
 
The State of Marketing 2012
The State of Marketing 2012The State of Marketing 2012
The State of Marketing 2012
 
Marketreport 100809100201-phpapp01
Marketreport 100809100201-phpapp01Marketreport 100809100201-phpapp01
Marketreport 100809100201-phpapp01
 
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report by Tony Rossell_Marketing_Gener...
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report by Tony Rossell_Marketing_Gener...2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report by Tony Rossell_Marketing_Gener...
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report by Tony Rossell_Marketing_Gener...
 
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report
2012 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report
 
Conquering The Omnichannel Arena
Conquering The Omnichannel ArenaConquering The Omnichannel Arena
Conquering The Omnichannel Arena
 
Marketers’ and consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of branded content
Marketers’ and consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of branded contentMarketers’ and consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of branded content
Marketers’ and consumers’ attitudes and perceptions of branded content
 
Maximizando las capacidades de autoservicio en la sucursal
Maximizando las capacidades de autoservicio en la sucursalMaximizando las capacidades de autoservicio en la sucursal
Maximizando las capacidades de autoservicio en la sucursal
 
Mobile is the glue of SoLoMo and ATAWAD
Mobile is the glue of SoLoMo and ATAWADMobile is the glue of SoLoMo and ATAWAD
Mobile is the glue of SoLoMo and ATAWAD
 
Diagnosing And Solving Membership Marketing Challenges - Tony Rossell-mgi
Diagnosing And Solving Membership Marketing Challenges - Tony Rossell-mgiDiagnosing And Solving Membership Marketing Challenges - Tony Rossell-mgi
Diagnosing And Solving Membership Marketing Challenges - Tony Rossell-mgi
 
Best practice in sales and marketing alignment
Best practice in sales and marketing alignment Best practice in sales and marketing alignment
Best practice in sales and marketing alignment
 
Measuring Social ROI: The CIO's Role
Measuring Social ROI: The CIO's RoleMeasuring Social ROI: The CIO's Role
Measuring Social ROI: The CIO's Role
 
The Challenge of todays CMO
The Challenge of todays CMOThe Challenge of todays CMO
The Challenge of todays CMO
 
Customer Loyalty In The Oilfield Reputation
Customer Loyalty In The Oilfield ReputationCustomer Loyalty In The Oilfield Reputation
Customer Loyalty In The Oilfield Reputation
 
7 effective strategies to use social media for your business
7 effective strategies to use social media for your business7 effective strategies to use social media for your business
7 effective strategies to use social media for your business
 

Brand Engagement Model & Study 2012

  • 1.
  • 2. Brand Engagement Index 2012 DECEMBER 2012
  • 3. – Management & research objectives – Methodology Report – Executive summary Overview – Meaning of brands – Measuring eNgagement – The four I’s – TOP 10 – Media exposure – Category results
  • 5. Management & Research Objectives Develop a research tool to measure Brand eNgagement and the related I’s. Rank 116 brands based on their Brand eNgagement score amongst Belgian consumers.  To support this mission, NBBDO is looking to operationalize the eNgagement concept in a quantitative survey that can be used… – … to rank a set of 116 brands based on their eNgagement performance – … to offer to its clients as a customized research tool in future projects  The outcome of this project will be threefold: – Master survey that measures Brand eNgagement – Model that shows the relationship between the four I’s, Brand eNgagement and business KPI’s – Ranking of 116 brands based on their eNgagement performance 5
  • 7. Methodology  Research method – Online survey – Recruitment via InSites’ Talktochange consumer panel – Field: 11/10/2012 – 23/10/2012 – Survey length: 18 minutes – Sample: • N(Respondents) = 2.331 • N(Brand evaluations) = 11.100  Screening & quota  Screening: – Age between 18-45 – Not active in danger occupations  Quota: – Language: Dutch (60%) – French(40%) • Gender: Male (50%) – Female (50%) – Age: 18-24 years (24%) – 25-34 years (36%) – 35-45 years (40%) 7
  • 9. Associations Q: To what extent do you agree with the following statements?. 2012 2011 2010 I expect brands to have a high value for money 54% 29% 14% 2% 84% 86% 94% Brands need the input of their consumers 26% 48% 23% 2% 74% 74% 79% Brands should be close to their consumers 18% 50% 27% 3% 1% 69% 70% 74% Brands should involve their consumers in the 19% 46% 29% 5%2% 65% 65% 71% development of new products and services Brands are attractive 13% 48% 31% 6% 3% 61% 61% 63% Brands should involve their consumers in their communication efforts (campaigns...) 11% 42% 38% 7% 2% 53% 51% 51% Brands can make us dream 15% 37% 34% 10% 4% 52% 51% 48% Branded products are more reliable 9% 39% 35% 13% 4% 49% 48% 55% Brands bring products closer to their consumers 8% 39% 42% 8% 3% 47% 48% 42% I find branded products more attractive than private labels 11% 35% 34% 15% 6% 46% 48% 50% Brands have to actively communicate with me 9% 33% 45% 11% 3% 41% 42% 39% Brands are a means to feel more confident 7% 28% 36% 19% 9% 35% 37% 33% Brands make people interact with each other 7% 29% 47% 14% 3% 35% 34% 27% Totally agree Rather agree Neutral Rather disagree Totally disagree N =2331 Sign. difference (95%) 9
  • 11. The model Influence on KPI’s There are very strong correlations between brand engagement and all KPI’s. Brand engagement can predict 37% to 48% of the KPI’s. Likeability and loyalty can be best predicted by engagement, uniqueness is somewhat less predictable by engagement towards the brand Likeability r² = 0,42 Intimacy r = 0,65 Loyalty r² = 0,48 r = 0,70 Involvement Brand Consideration r = 0,65 r² = 0,42 eNgagement Index r = 0,65 Interaction Purchase r² = 0,42 intention The BEI (Brand r = 0,61 eNgagement Index) is a Influence score on 100, consisting of the scores on the four Uniqueness r² = 0,37 dimensions of engagement 11
  • 12. Recommendation Reasons Q: You said you would recommend this brand to others. Please indicate why you would recommend this brand to others? Q: Can you think of other things that would trigger you to recommend this brand to others? My personal experience with this brand triggers me to 46% recommend this brand to others My price/quality perception of this brand 44% The products and services of this brand 40% I just love the brand 35% The promotions from the brand 24% This brand puts a lot of efforts in its consumers 17% The buzz (campaigns, events, etc.) about this brand 9% triggers me to do so The mission of this brand 9% The activities from the company behind the brand 8% None of these 5% N =4458 / F= Only if they would recommend the brand 12
  • 13. No recommendation Reasons Q: You said you would not recommend this brand to others. Please indicate why you would not recommend this brand to others? Q: Can you think of other things that prevents you from recommending this brand to others? I just don’t love the brand 28% My price/quality perception of this brand 17% My personal experience with this brand triggers me 16% to not recommend this brand to others The products and services of this brand 13% This brand does not put a lot of efforts in its 8% consumers The (lack of) promotions from the brand 7% The lack of activities from the company behind the 6% brand The mission of this brand 5% The buzz (campaigns, events, etc.) about this 4% brand does not trigger me to do so None of these 35% N =2548 / F= Only if they would not recommend the brand 13
  • 15. Sectors with lower & higher engagement DECEMBER 2012
  • 16. ▸ low engagement categories (52 – 53,9) - Energy – Dairy – Margarines - Beer ▸ Medium engagement categories (54 – 56,5) - Water - Automotive – Magazines – Juices – Banks – CSD – Coffee – Chocolate snacks ▸ High engagement categories (57 – 61,4) - Salty snacks – cellphones – telecom – retail
  • 17. Low engagement DECEMBER 2012
  • 18. The 4 I’s Energy Energy Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Electrabel Luminus Eneco Essent Lampiris Interaction Nuon Belpower 18
  • 19. The 4 I’s Dairy products Dairy products Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Campina Joyvalle Inex Inza Danone Nestlé Lactel Interaction Kraft 19
  • 20. The 4 I’s Butter Butter Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Solo Planta Bertolli Becel Alpro Interaction 20
  • 21. The 4 I’s Beers Beers Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Stella Artois Jupiler Maes Duvel Palm Vedett Hoegaarden Leffe Interaction 21
  • 22. Medium engagement DECEMBER 2012
  • 23. The 4 I’s Water Water Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Spa Perrier Vittel BRU Contrex Chaudfontaine Interaction Evian 23
  • 24. The 4 I’s Cars Cars Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Volvo Mercedes BMW Audi Volkswagen Interaction MINI Toyota 24
  • 25. The 4 I’s Magazines Magazines Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Dag Allemaal Humo Libelle Story Flair P-magazine Feeling Interaction Goed Gevoel Knack TV Familie Vitaya 25
  • 26. The 4 I’s Fruit juices Fruit juices Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Minute Maid Appelsientje Looza Materne Sunland Interaction Capri Sun Tropicana 26
  • 27. The 4 I’s Banks Banks Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment KBC Belfius ING BNP Paribas Fortis Argenta AXA Interaction 27
  • 28. The 4 I’s Cola Cola Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Coca-Cola Coca-Cola light Pepsi Pepsi Max River Interaction Lidl Cola 28
  • 29. The 4 I’s Coffee Coffee Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Douwe Egberts Illy Nespresso Dolce Gusto Jacqmotte Interaction Nescafé 29
  • 30. The 4 I’s Chocolate Chocolate Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Mars Snickers M&Ms Leo KitKat Interaction Twix Maltesers Côte dOr KinderBueno Milka 30
  • 31. High engagement DECEMBER 2012
  • 32. The 4 I’s Retail Retail Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Delhaize Carrefour Colruyt Lidl Aldi Interaction Makro 32
  • 33. The 4 I’s Telco Telco Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Belgacom Proximus Mobistar Base Telenet Mobile Vikings Interaction VOO 33
  • 34. The 4 I’s Cellphones Cellphones Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Nokia Sony Samsung Apple HTC BlackBerry LG Interaction 34
  • 35. The 4 I’s Salty snacks Salty snacks Intimacy 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Influence 0% Involvment Lays Smiths Croky TUC Pringles Interaction 35
  • 36. The 4 I’s Salty snacks 2012 2011 2010 52% This brand is present in places that I frequently visit 50% 43% ntimacy 30% This brand is very much present in my daily life 34% 31% This brand succeeds in reaching me as it is present at the right place 40% 44% and at the right moment 36% 23% I feel involved with this brand 25% 18% 18% I feel involved in the actions this brand undertakes 11% 18% nvolvement 17% This brand involves me in its communication efforts 14% 8% 24% This brand stimulates conversations about itself 25% 19% This brand stimulates interaction with its users by organizing things 25% that fit to their consumers lifestyles 20% 17% nteraction By evoking buzz (campaigns, events, etc) this brand induces a 26% 26% dialogue between consumers 18% 61% I would recommend the brand to others 66% 23% 23% I have recently spoken about this brand to someone 22% 20% 18% nfluence The brand has triggered me to join conversations about it 18% 15% Sign. difference compared to last year 95%) 36
  • 37. 4 I’s score for Lays (2010-2011-2012) Intimacy 80 60 2010 2011 40 2012 20 Influence 0 Involvement Interaction
  • 39. Top 10 2011 Overall © InSites Consulting Brand eNgagement Index 39
  • 40. Top 10 2011 Overall - Users © InSites Consulting Counts below 30 Sign. difference (95%) . = Not tested in 2010 Brand eNgagement Index 40
  • 41. Top 10 2012 Overall In TOP10 2011 Not in TOP 10 (colruyt, delhaize en zero are new brands) No significance difference 41 . = Not tested this year
  • 42. Top 10 2012 Overall users In TOP10 2011 Not in TOP 10 (eneco & colruyt are new brands) Sign. difference (95%) 42 . = Not tested this year
  • 43. Media exposure DECEMBER 2012
  • 44. Media exposure Above the line exposure Q: On which of the following occoasions did you encounter the brands that are listed below? In printed media: newspapers, magazines Radio spots On another website On the website of the brand VARIANCE) On other social media I have encountered the brand TV advertisements in a conversation with a Other On Twitter I have seen this brand in a friend/family member store On Pinterest DIMENSION 1 (11% EXPLAINED In the street: abri, billboard, etc. I have seen this brand at a In public places: flyers, street friend’s place animation, sampling, tasting, On Facebook etc Athletes that are sponsored by the brand At sponsored events/festivals Significant on dimension 1 Significant on dimension 2 Significant on both dimensions DIMENSION 1 (65% EXPLAINED VARIANCE) 44
  • 45. Media exposure Q: On which of the following occoasions did you encounter the brands that are listed below? Choco- Auto- Cell- Distri- Maga- Marga- Salty Dairy Banks Beer late Coffee Coke Energy Juices Telco Waters motive phones butie zines rines snacks products snacks TV advertisements 66% 44% 41% 42% 63% 55% 49% 20% 42% 39% 38% 52% 52% 64% 59% 42% In the street: abri, billboard, etc. 49% 38% 25% 25% 24% 26% 30% 26% 20% 18% 21% 13% 23% 44% 25% 14% In printed media: newspapers, 47% 43% 27% 32% 19% 28% 25% 39% 36% 20% 37% 23% 22% 44% 24% 20% magazines I have seen this brand at a friend’s 39% 14% 45% 44% 35% 33% 47% 28% 11% 31% 40% 30% 48% 34% 31% 28% place I have seen this brand in a store 33% 10% 69% 55% 68% 61% 70% 51% 8% 70% 57% 72% 71% 35% 68% 69% In a conversation with a 31% 25% 22% 29% 13% 18% 23% 28% 20% 10% 19% 13% 13% 33% 15% 8% friend/family member On the website of the brand 25% 23% 10% 25% 9% 13% 12% 24% 18% 8% 14% 9% 14% 31% 10% 7% Radio spots 22% 31% 16% 7% 10% 11% 12% 17% 31% 8% 25% 7% 9% 39% 8% 8% At sponsored events/festivals 20% 23% 27% 13% 7% 8% 26% 5% 10% 7% 11% 3% 11% 29% 13% 5% In public places: flyers, street 20% 17% 23% 14% 17% 19% 29% 20% 14% 16% 11% 13% 23% 29% 13% 15% animation, sampling, tasting, etc. Athletes that are sponsored 9% 15% 5% 6% 3% 4% 11% 5% 7% 2% 3% 2% 4% 14% 7% 5% by the brand On Facebook 9% 6% 7% 12% 7% 7% 10% 6% 5% 4% 7% 4% 8% 14% 5% 3% On another website 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 1% 3% 2% 3% 4% 2% 2% On Pinterest 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% On Twitter 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 5% 2% 2% On other social media 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% Other 2% 4% 2% 1% 1% 3% 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% None of the above 10% 14% 8% 13% 7% 10% 10% 12% 16% 10% 11% 10% 7% 7% 9% 11% 45
  • 46. Categorie results DECEMBER 2012
  • 48. Category results Coke TOP 3 among total TOTAL USERS NON-USERS 1 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2 Average 52,7 53,8 56,5 54,5 55,3 57,7 35,6 38,7 44,2 3 Coca Cola 66,2 68,1 70,1 66,2 68,8 70,2 60,0 26,7 63,3 Cola Light 59,6 63,6 61,4 60,8 64,6 62,5 42,7 46,3 48,7 Pepsi 50,2 53,8 54,7 51,0 54,5 55,1 40,4 46,8 49,8 TOP 3 among users Pepsi Max 53,8 53,6 54,3 55,4 54,7 55,2 38,8 41,7 44,8 Lidl cola 45,9 44,9 48,2 50,2 47,7 49,6 29,9 30,9 41,7 1 River cola 38,6 39,0 44,1 39,3 38,9 45,3 33,1 39,5 34,9 Coca-cola Zero . . 62,7 . . 64,0 . . 50,1 2 3 Sign. difference (95%) 48
  • 49. Executive summary DECEMBER 2012
  • 51. Executive Summary Conclusions • The overall feeling towards brands is consumers need to receive high value for money. In addition brands need to listen to their consumers. They should be close to their consumers and listen to their needs and even involve them in the development of new products and services. • These two characteristics are key for brand recommendation. A good price/quality perception and the personal experience are the main drivers of brand recommendation. There is no willingness to recommend when either these two characteristics are not present or there is no ‘love’ between the consumer and the brand (or its services/products). • This points out the importance to engage with consumers as a brand. The brand eNgagement index is a model to measure brand engagement. This model focuses on 4 dimensions: Involvement, Influence, Intimacy and Interaction. These dimensions explain the majority of the variance in the brand engagement index. The brand engagement index influences the brand KPIs such as likeability, loyalty, consideration, purchase intention and uniqueness.
  • 52. Executive Summary Conclusions • The brand eNgagement index (BEI) integrates the scores on each of the four dimensions and can reach a maximum score of 100. • On a brand level Coca Cola, Colruyt, Apple, Samsung, Douwe Egberts, Cote D’or, Proximus, Telenet, Delhaize & Coke Zero are the best scoring brands out of the 116 evaluated brands. Four new brands came in the Top10, whereof two retailers : Colruyt and Delhaize. Coke Zero took the place of Coke Light. Unlike Telenet, last year n°2, just remained in the top 10. Among users only, Coca Cola and Apple perform well but smaller brands such as Mobile Vikings, Argenta and Eneco that are in the top. • On category level, the 3 best scoring categories are retail, telecom and cellphones. • Media exposure remains a driver of brand engagement. There is a direct positive effect on brands which have more exposure on their BEI score.
  • 53.