Many institutions see technology as a strategy to increase revenues and decrease campus-bases classrooms and resources. However, as emerging technologies shift the course from teaching-centered to learning-centered, historically effective strategies may no longer provide the same return on investment. This session examines how we can maximize the return on value of technology to increase learner engagement, add instructional options, and improve faculty efficacy.

1. The future looks digital Patricia McGee Leading from the Middle

3. Who you are 3 Instructional Designer 6 Instructor 6 VP 8 Deans,Academic (+ Asst) 9 Deans, Admin 16 Admin. (Dir., Co-ord, Man.) 27 Chairs (+ Asst) # Role

4. Roles, roles, roles

8. Why should we attend to what other “stakeholders” think, do, believe ?

11. 1995 Strategies

14. What does this suggest for the future?

16. Shifts in learning environments Not just in class Not just via the Internet Not just on a computer LSU Alexandria

17. The “new” academy? Environments . e-mail, WebCT, VLEs, Blogs, IM, SMS, Wikis, discussion forums, gaming, shopping… Strategies . Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), publishing, activism… Activities. Practice, inquiry, observation, debate, projects… Assessments . Digital papers, Power Point™ Presentations, ePortfolios, Communities of Practice…

19. What has changed for the learner?

20. What has changed for the learner?

21. Think back 10 years…

22. Think about today…

25. What about faculty?

27. What has changed for faculty?

28. What has changed for faculty?

32. Technology as a solution Or a new challenge

45. Thinking about how programs and courses work

49. Silo Approach Web-enhanced Blended/hybrid 100% Online Expense Support Time Learner/Instructor Expertise Need for other online institutional resources

50. Incremental Approach Phase 1 -Web-enhanced Establish infrastructure, services Phase 2 - Blended/Hybrid for appropriate courses Expand infrastructure, services, seek partners Phase 3 - 100% for appropriate courses Establish partnerships

55. New systems

56. Pros? Cons?

58. New tools - Hardware -clickers, tablets, smart phones Software - convergent systems Web 2.0 Applications

59. What value does this add?

63. MIT OpenCourse

64. But the users determine How the technology is used

65. Kotaku

67. Healthcare Simulation

71. Go2Web2.0

73. Reuse

74. Work with Vendors! Publishers Hardware Software