SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 36
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Journal of American Society of Nephrology
20:1103-1112,2009

        SPEAKER              MODERATOR
DR. ANKUR NANDAN VARSHNEY   PROF. N. K. SINGH
   Most serious manifestations of SLE
    It present as microscopic hematuria and
    proteinuria (>500 mg /24 hrs)
   Approx half patients develop nephrotic
    syndrome
   Hypertension is common
   If left untreated , virtually all patient of DPGN
    develops ESRD within 2 years of diagnosis

Al Arfaraj AS et al. Rheumatol Int2009 Jul;29(9):1057-67
Class I: Minimal Mesangial Lupus Nephritis
Class II:Mesangial Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
Class III: Focal Lupus Nephritis
         Class III (A): Active lesions—focal proliferative lupus nephritis
         Class III (A/C): Active and chronic lesions—focal proliferative and sclerosing lupus
      nephritis
         Class III (C): Chronic inactive lesions with glomerular scars—focal sclerosing lupus
      nephritis

Class IV: Diffuse Lupus Nephritis
      class IV-S (A): Active lesions-diffuse segmental proliferative lupus nephritis
      class IV-G (A): Active lesions-diffuse global proliferative lupus nephritis
       class IV-S(A/C): Active and chronic lesions-diffuse segmental proliferative and sclerosing
      lupus nephritis
        class IV-G(A/C): Active and chronic lesions-diffuse global proliferative and sclerosing
      lupus nephritis
      class IV-S(C): Chronic inactive lesions with scars-diffuse segmental sclerosing lupus
      nephritis
      class IV-G(C): diffuse global sclerosing lupus nephritis

ClassV: Membranous Lupus Nephritis
Class VI:Advanced Sclerotic Lupus Nephritis                          90% of glomeruli
    globally sclerosed without residual activity.
   Weening JJ et al. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol2004. 15 (2): 241–50.
 High dose immunosuppression is required
 Cytotoxic agents are given along with high
  dose steroids
 Treatment consists of
1. Induction phase
2. Maintenance phase
Induction
        CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
         Dose = 500- 750 mg/m2 iv monthly for 6 months ( NIH)
               500 mg iv 2 weekly for 6 cycles (European)
         MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL 2 – 3 gm/daily until remission
         occur
        High dose steroids are used along
        Therapeutic responses begin after 3-16 weeks of therapy


    Maintenance :-
    1.     MYCOPHENOLATE 1.5- 2 gm /daily
    2.     AZATHIOPRINE 2mg/kg/DAY


        Impovement in 80% of individuals occur in a span of 1-2
         years

         (Chan TM. The American Journal of Medicine2012;125:642-648)
   A nitrogen mustard alkylating agent from the
    oxazophorines group

   Mechanism : a metabolite called phosphoramide
    mustard which forms cross links both between and
    within DNA strands at guanine N-7 position leading
    to cell death

   Side effects- infections ,bone marrow suppression,
    ovarian and testicular failure*, alopecia, hemorrhagic
    cystitis, bladder carcinoma, teratogenic, malignancy,
    nausea, diahorrea
*54% by McDermott et al. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55: 224-229
*26% by Mok CC et al. Arthritis and rheumatism 1998;41:831-837
   A prodrug of mycophenolic acid

   Mechanism : inhibitor of inosine
    monophosphate dehydrogenase which helps
    in purine synthesis needed for growth of B
    cells and T cells

   Side effects – infections, bone marrow
    suppression, lymphoproliferative disorders,
    alopecia, GI symptoms, hypokalemia,
    hypercholesterolemia, teratogenic
Journal of American Society of
Nephrology 20:1103-
1112,2009
   Chan TM , Li FK , Tang CSO, et al. Efficacy of mycophenolate
    mofetil in diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. N Engl J
    Med.2000;343;1156-1162 showed that prednisolone + MMF and
    prednislone + cyclophosphamide are equally effective (n=42)

   Ong LM , Hooi LS , Lim TO, et al .randomized controlled trial of
    pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate
    mofetil in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis .
    Nephrology,2005; 10; 504-510 showed that prednisolone +
    MMF and prednisolone + pulse cyclophosphamide are equally
    effective (n=44)

   Ginzler EM , Dooley MA , Aranow C , et al. Mycophenolate mofetil
    or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis. N Engl J
    Med. 2005; 353 ;2219-2228 showed that prednisolone + MMF is
    more effective than prednisolone + pulse cyclophosphamide
    (n=140 )
   A prospective, randomized, open label,
    parallel – group, multicentre study

   Hypothesis was stated that more patient with
    lupus nephritis would respond to MMF than
    to Cyclophosphamide during 24 weeks
   Patients aged between 12 yrs and 75 yrs

   Diagnosis of SLE by ACR criteria (Hochberg MC.
    Arthritis Rheum 40:1725,1997)

   Lupus nephritis( active, active/chronic) as
    confirmed by renal biopsy as ISN class III , IV-S,
    IV-G, V, III+V ,IV+V within 6 months before
    randomization

   Must have clinically significant level of proteinuria
    ( atleast 2g/day)
   Treatment with either MMF or cyclophosphamide within
    the previous year
   Continuous dialysis for > 2 weeks before randomization
    or anticipated duration longer than 8 weeks
   Pancreatitis
   Gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 6 months or active
    peptic ulcer within 3 months
   Severe viral infection
   Severe cardiovascular disease
   Bone marrow insufficiency with cytopenias not
    attributable to SLE
   Current infection requiring iv antibiotics
   Stratified by race and biopsy class, patients were
    randomly assigned to treatment with MMF and
    cyclophosphamide in a ratio of 1:1

   Cyclophosphamide was given in monthly pulses of 0.5-
    1 g/m2 as per NIH protocol

   Oral MMF was given twice daily as 0.5 g in first week,
    1.0 g in 2nd week, 1.5 g in 3rd week. Dose were
    decreased to 2 g /day in response to adverse effect

   Both groups received oral prednisone
    Induction period was defined as 24 weeks based on
     prior studies to predict outcome and minimizing
     adverse effect.(conteras et al;NEJM350:971-980,2004. Houssiau et
     al;arthritis rheu 50:3934-3940,2004)

    Patients were assessed at 2nd week , 4th week and then every
     4 weekly

    Patients were withdrawn if
1.     At week 12 there serum creatinine was >30% above
       baseline on two successive measurements separated by at
       least 12 weeks
2.     When they required other immunosuppressive therapy
3.     If MMF dosage fell below 2 g/day for >14 days or was
       stopped for >7 days
Patient disposition. *Hepatitis/cytomegalovirus infection (n = 16) or other illness (n = 4).




                                 Appel G B et al. JASN 2009;20:1103-1112



©2009 by American Society of Nephrology
Characteristic      MMF(n=185)     Cyclophosphami Total(n=370)
                                   de
Gender (n [%])
         male          28 (15.1)      29 (15.7)       57 (15.4)
         female       157 (84.9)     156 (84.3)      313 (84.6)
Race (n [%])
         white         75 (40.5)      72 (38.9)      147 (39.7)
         Asian         62 (33.5)      61 (33.0)      123 (33.2)
         other         48 (25.9)      52 (28.1)      100 (27.0)
Ethnicity (n [%])
         Hispanic      64 (34.6)      67 (36.2)      131 (35.4)
        non-          121 (65.4)     118 (63.8)      239 (64.6)
Hispanic
Characteristic        MMF             Cyclophosphamide     Total

Region (n [%])
        Asia            57 (30.8)         60 (32.4)         117 (31.6)
    Latin America       56 (30.3)         50 (27.0)         106 (28.6)
        United          37 (20.0)         38 (20.5)          75 (20.3)
States/Canada
      rest of world     35 (18.9)         37 (20.0)          72 (19.5)
Renal biopsy class
(n [%])
        III/III + V     32 (17.3)         26 (14.1)          58 (15.7)
        IV/IV + V      124 (67.0)         128 (69.2)        252 (68.1)
        V only          29 (15.7)         31 (16.8)          60 (16.2)
Scarring on renal       66 (35.7)         56 (30.3)         122 (33.0)
biopsy (n [%])
Serum creatinine       108.6 ± 1.2    92.7 ± 1.0 (56.9 ±   100.6 ± 1.1
(μmol/L [mg/dl];       (97.2 ± 1.1)          0.6)          (80.0 ± 0.9)
mean ± SD)
Urine                   4.1 ± 4.2         4.1 ± 3.2          4.1 ± 3.7
protein/creatinine
ratio (mean ± SD)
Characteristic               MMF                Cyclophosphamide   Total


Range of GFR (ml/min per
1.73 m2; n [%])
        ≥90                        80 (43.2)           86 (46.7)           166 (45.0)

        ≥60 to <90                 53 (28.6)           52 (28.3)           105 (28.5)

        ≥30 to <60                 32 (17.3)           34 (18.5)           66 (17.9)

        <30                        20 (10.8)           12 (6.5)             32 (8.7)

Range of anti-dsDNA
antibody titer (IU/ml; n
[%])
        <30 (negative)             32 (18.4)           23 (13.5)           55 (15.9)

         30 to 60 (low             25 (14.4)           24 (14.0)           49 (14.2)
positive)
         >60 to 200                52 (29.9)           40 (23.4)           92 (26.7)
(positive)
         >200 (strong              65 (37.4)           84 (49.1)           149 (43.2)
positive)
Range of C3
concentration (g/L; n [%])
        >1.8                        1 (0.6)             1 (0.6)             2 (0.6)

        0.9 to 1.8                 50 (28.4)           34 (19.5)           84 (24.0)
(normal)
        <0.9 (low)                 125 (71.0)         139 (79.9)           264 (75.4)
Characteristic     MMF(n=185)       Cyclophosphami Total
                                    de(n=185)      ( n=370)
Range of C4
concentration
(g/L; n [%])
        >0.47          2 (1.1)          1 (0.6)         3 (0.9)

        0.16 to       70 (39.8)        47 (27.2)      117 (33.5)
0.47 (normal)
        <0.16        104 (59.1)       125 (72.3)      229 (65.6)

Age at              32.4 ± 11.2       31.3 ± 10.3    31.9 ± 10.7
enrollment (yr;
mean ± SD)
Age at diagnosis    30.2 ± 11.0       28.8 ± 10.2    29.5 ± 10.6
of lupus
nephritis (yr;
mean ± SD)
Time since          1.0 (1 to 21)    1.0 (1 to 23)   1.0 (1 to 23)
diagnosis of
lupus nephritis
(yr; median
[range])
    RESPONSE : defined as
1.    Decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio to < 3 in patients
      with baseline range >3
2.    By > 50% decrease in patients with subnephrotic baseline
      protein/creatinine ratio (<3)
3.    Stabilization or improvement in serum creatinine

     NON RESPONDER : defined as
1.    Received pulse methylprednisolone for any renal or extra
      renal flare
2.    Who did not complete 24 week induction therapy
   Key secondary end points included
    ◦ the proportion of patients who achieved complete
      remission, defined as return to normal serum creatinine,
      urine protein <0.5 g/d, and inactive urinary sediment (<5
      white blood cells per high-power field and <5 red blood
      cells per high-power field, and a reading of lower than 2 on
      dipstick and absence of red cell casts);


    ◦ proportion of patients who achieved any one of these renal
      outcomes; combined renal and extrarenal remission,
      defined as absence of A and B scores on the British Isles
      Lupus Assessment Group system;

    ◦ mean change on the Safety of Exogenous Estrogens in
      Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment/Systemic Lupus
      Erythematosus Disease Activity Index
Response rates of study population and by racial group.




                                 Appel G B et al. JASN 2009;20:1103-1112



©2009 by American Society of Nephrology
Parameter         MMF ( n= 185)   Cyclophosphami Odd’s Ratio
                                  de ( n= 185 )  (95% CI)
Responders with 88 (56.4)         83 (53.9)      1.1(0.7 to 1.8)
renal biopsy
class III or IV
Patients with     16 (55.2)       15(48.4)
class V
Renal remission
criteria
Serum creatinine 130 (70.3)       125 (67.6)     2.7(-6.7 to
                                                 12.1)
Urine protein     44 (23.8)       50 (27)        -3.2(-12.1to
                                                 5.6)
Urine sediments   58 (31.4)       44 (23.8)      7.6(-1.5to16.6)
All three         16 (8.6)        15 (8.1)       0.5(-5.1to6.2)
parameter          MMF             Cyclophosphami Total
                                   de
Renal and extra    54(29.7)        45(24.9)       4.8(4.3 to 14)
renal remission
Absence of
BILAG score
SELENA-SLEDAI      -6.2 +/- 10.1   -6.6 +/-8
change in score
from baseline to
endpoint
Anti-DsDNA         117(67.2)       124(72.5)
>60 at baseline
Anti-DsDNA>60 72(41.4)             91(53.2)
at end point
Low C3 at          125(71)         139(79.9)
baseline
Low C3 at end      70(39.8)        90(51.7)
point
Low C4 at          104(59.1)       125(72.3)
baseline
Low C4 at end      51(29)          72(41.6)
point
Parameter                                MMF (n= 185)   Cyclophosphamide ( n= 185)


Completed 24 week open label induction   150 (81.1)     156 (84.3)
phase
Withdrawn prematurely                    35 (18.9)      29 (15.7)

Reasons for withdrawl

Adverse event                            21 (60)        12(41.4)

Deteoriation with respect to serum       0              2 (6.9)
creatinine after 12 and 16 week
Dosage reduction of MMF <2g/d for >14    1(2.9)         0
day
Lost to follow up                        1(2.9)         2(6.9)

Patient died                             3 (8.6)        1(3.4)

Withdrew consent                         6 (17.1)       5 (17.2)

Physician decision                       1 (2.9)        3 (10.3)

Sponsor decision                         2 (5.7)        1 (3.4)

Non compliance                           0              1 (3.4)

Reason not noted                         0              2 (6.9)
Parameter                MMF (n=184)   Cyclophosphamide
                                       (n=180)
Deaths                   9 (4.9)       5 (2.8)
Withdrawals as a result 24 (13.0)      13 (7.2)
of AEs
All AEs                  177 (96.2)    171 (95.0)
          diarrhea       52 (28.3)     23 (12.8)
          headache       38 (20.7)     47 (26.1)
  peripheral edema       35 (19.0)     30 (16.7)

          arthralgia     29 (15.8)     43 (23.9)
          nausea         27 (14.7)     82 (45.6)
          hypertension   26 (14.1)     25 (13.9)
Parameter                 MMF         Cyclophosphamide


                          25 (13.6)   29 (16.1)
nasopharyngitis

        vomiting          25 (13.6)   68 (37.8)
        cough             24 (13.0)   16 (8.9)
        anemia            23 (12.5)   12 (6.7)
        alopecia          20 (10.9)   64 (35.6)
      abdominal pain      19 (10.3)   13 (7.2)


        back pain         19 (10.3)   16 (8.9)
      muscle spasms       19 (10.3)   17 (9.4)


        rash              19 (10.3)   21 (11.7)
urinary tract infection   19 (10.3)   17 (9.4)
   MMF did not show any superiority over
    cyclophosphamide for induction therapy for lupus
    nephritis

   However, there were important racial differences as
    the Blacks and Hispanics who are at increased risk
    of aggressive disease, responded more to MMF
    than cyclophosphamide

   Though the most common side effects were
    infections and GI side effects that occur
    comparatively in both groups, alopecia an
    undesirable side effect occur mainly in
    cyclophosphamide group
   Convenience of twice daily oral medication versus
    hospitalization for monthly infusion for
    cyclophosphamide was not addressed

   Impact of cyclophosphamide to cause ovarian
    dysfunction on women of child bearing age was
    not discussed

   24 weeks may be too short to differentiate
    between treatments as disease may continue to
    improve and side effects may continue to emerge
    later with cyclophosphamide (Ioannidis et al. Kidney Int
    57:258-264,2000)
   Conteras et al. N Engl J Med.2004;350:971-980
Showed in a randomized trial (n=59) that 72 month
 survival rate free of renal failure higher in MMF and
 AZA group than quarterly cyclophosphamide group

   Houssiau et al. Ann Rheum Dis.2010;69:2083-
    2089 showed in a randomized trial (n=105) that
    MMF not more effective than AZA in prolonging
    time to renal flare
Dooley et al.N Eng J med
2011;365:1886-95
   Mycophenolate was superior to azathioprine
    in maintaining a renal response to treatment
    and preventing relapse in patients with lupus
    nephritis who had a response to induction
    therapy
   LUNAR study: a trial on stage III and IV lupus
    nephritis showed that add on rituximab had no
    clinical impact in patients treated with
    corticosteroid and MMF.(Furie et al.Ann Rheum
    Dis.2010;69(suppl 3):549a

   EXPLORER study : Rituximab(anti CD20
    monoclonal antibody) showed an impact on
    serological parameters but not on clinical efficacy
    in patients with active nonrenal lupus.(Merrill et
    al.Lupus.2011;20:709-716)
   A phase III trial with Belimumab (a monoclonal
    antibody against the ligand of BlyS/BAFF receptor
    on B cells that promotes B cell survival and
    differentiation to plasmablasts) showed efficacy
    with extrarenal lupus but there is insufficient data
    in lupus nephritis.(Navarra et al.Lancet.2011;377:721-
    731)
 On the basis of above studies, physicians may
  consider MMF as an alternative to
  Cyclophosphamide in induction treatment of
  lupus nephritis depending upon:
1. Adverse effects
2. Socioeconomic factors
3. Racial factors


(Chan TM. The American Journal of Medicine2012;125:642-
    648)
Lupus nephritis

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

A Detailed study on Lupus Nephritis
A Detailed study on Lupus NephritisA Detailed study on Lupus Nephritis
A Detailed study on Lupus NephritisShaswat Nayak
 
Renal amyloidosis
Renal amyloidosisRenal amyloidosis
Renal amyloidosismukkukiran
 
Lupus nephritis 2016
Lupus nephritis 2016Lupus nephritis 2016
Lupus nephritis 2016drsamianik
 
Tubulointerstitial Nephritis
Tubulointerstitial NephritisTubulointerstitial Nephritis
Tubulointerstitial Nephritisautumnpianist
 
Hiv associated nephropathy (hivan)
Hiv associated nephropathy (hivan)Hiv associated nephropathy (hivan)
Hiv associated nephropathy (hivan)carol dzorani
 
Diabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathyDiabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathyPrateek Singh
 
Membranoproliferative GN - Road to Diagnosis & Management - What is the evide...
Membranoproliferative GN - Road to Diagnosis & Management - What is the evide...Membranoproliferative GN - Road to Diagnosis & Management - What is the evide...
Membranoproliferative GN - Road to Diagnosis & Management - What is the evide...NephroTube - Dr.Gawad
 
Nephrotic syndrome
Nephrotic syndrome Nephrotic syndrome
Nephrotic syndrome maliha shah
 
Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone DiseaseChronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone DiseaseWaleed El-Refaey
 
Autoimmune hepatitis rajesh
Autoimmune hepatitis rajeshAutoimmune hepatitis rajesh
Autoimmune hepatitis rajeshMohit Aggarwal
 
Tubulointerstitial nephritis
Tubulointerstitial nephritisTubulointerstitial nephritis
Tubulointerstitial nephritisSwati Wadhai
 
Hiv associated nephropathy(Dr. sood)
Hiv associated nephropathy(Dr. sood)Hiv associated nephropathy(Dr. sood)
Hiv associated nephropathy(Dr. sood)polobismuth
 
Focal & segmental glomerulosclerosis
Focal & segmental glomerulosclerosisFocal & segmental glomerulosclerosis
Focal & segmental glomerulosclerosisMohammad Manzoor
 
Approach to Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis RPGN
Approach to Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis RPGNApproach to Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis RPGN
Approach to Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis RPGNGarima Aggarwal
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

A Detailed study on Lupus Nephritis
A Detailed study on Lupus NephritisA Detailed study on Lupus Nephritis
A Detailed study on Lupus Nephritis
 
Renal amyloidosis
Renal amyloidosisRenal amyloidosis
Renal amyloidosis
 
Lupus nephritis 2016
Lupus nephritis 2016Lupus nephritis 2016
Lupus nephritis 2016
 
Tubulointerstitial Nephritis
Tubulointerstitial NephritisTubulointerstitial Nephritis
Tubulointerstitial Nephritis
 
Hiv associated nephropathy (hivan)
Hiv associated nephropathy (hivan)Hiv associated nephropathy (hivan)
Hiv associated nephropathy (hivan)
 
Diabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathyDiabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathy
 
Diabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathyDiabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathy
 
Henoch Schönlein Purpura
Henoch Schönlein PurpuraHenoch Schönlein Purpura
Henoch Schönlein Purpura
 
Lupus nephritis nids
Lupus nephritis nidsLupus nephritis nids
Lupus nephritis nids
 
Renal amyloidosis
Renal amyloidosisRenal amyloidosis
Renal amyloidosis
 
Membranoproliferative GN - Road to Diagnosis & Management - What is the evide...
Membranoproliferative GN - Road to Diagnosis & Management - What is the evide...Membranoproliferative GN - Road to Diagnosis & Management - What is the evide...
Membranoproliferative GN - Road to Diagnosis & Management - What is the evide...
 
Nephrotic syndrome
Nephrotic syndrome Nephrotic syndrome
Nephrotic syndrome
 
Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone DiseaseChronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disease
 
IgA nephropathy
IgA nephropathyIgA nephropathy
IgA nephropathy
 
Renal amyloidosis
Renal amyloidosisRenal amyloidosis
Renal amyloidosis
 
Autoimmune hepatitis rajesh
Autoimmune hepatitis rajeshAutoimmune hepatitis rajesh
Autoimmune hepatitis rajesh
 
Tubulointerstitial nephritis
Tubulointerstitial nephritisTubulointerstitial nephritis
Tubulointerstitial nephritis
 
Hiv associated nephropathy(Dr. sood)
Hiv associated nephropathy(Dr. sood)Hiv associated nephropathy(Dr. sood)
Hiv associated nephropathy(Dr. sood)
 
Focal & segmental glomerulosclerosis
Focal & segmental glomerulosclerosisFocal & segmental glomerulosclerosis
Focal & segmental glomerulosclerosis
 
Approach to Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis RPGN
Approach to Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis RPGNApproach to Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis RPGN
Approach to Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis RPGN
 

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (20)

Lupus nephritis 2012
Lupus nephritis 2012Lupus nephritis 2012
Lupus nephritis 2012
 
lupus nephritis
lupus nephritislupus nephritis
lupus nephritis
 
new therapeutic drugs in lupus nephritis
new therapeutic drugs in lupus nephritisnew therapeutic drugs in lupus nephritis
new therapeutic drugs in lupus nephritis
 
Febrile neutropenia ankur
Febrile neutropenia ankurFebrile neutropenia ankur
Febrile neutropenia ankur
 
7 shock
7 shock7 shock
7 shock
 
New Treatments for Lupus by Daniel J. Wallace, MD
New Treatments for Lupus by Daniel J. Wallace, MDNew Treatments for Lupus by Daniel J. Wallace, MD
New Treatments for Lupus by Daniel J. Wallace, MD
 
Management of Lupus Nephritis
Management of Lupus NephritisManagement of Lupus Nephritis
Management of Lupus Nephritis
 
Lupus nephritis peals
Lupus nephritis peals Lupus nephritis peals
Lupus nephritis peals
 
Lupus nephritis post fff
Lupus nephritis  post fffLupus nephritis  post fff
Lupus nephritis post fff
 
Aml
AmlAml
Aml
 
Diabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathyDiabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathy
 
Pathophysiology of lupus nephritis
Pathophysiology of lupus nephritisPathophysiology of lupus nephritis
Pathophysiology of lupus nephritis
 
HbA1c : glycosylated hemoglobin
HbA1c : glycosylated hemoglobin HbA1c : glycosylated hemoglobin
HbA1c : glycosylated hemoglobin
 
Glomerular diseases
Glomerular diseases Glomerular diseases
Glomerular diseases
 
Lupus Nephritis
Lupus NephritisLupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis
 
Renal calculi
Renal calculiRenal calculi
Renal calculi
 
Urinary tract infections
Urinary tract infectionsUrinary tract infections
Urinary tract infections
 
Urinary Tract Infection
Urinary Tract InfectionUrinary Tract Infection
Urinary Tract Infection
 
Urinary tract infections
Urinary tract infectionsUrinary tract infections
Urinary tract infections
 
19 Acute Glomerulonephritis
19 Acute Glomerulonephritis19 Acute Glomerulonephritis
19 Acute Glomerulonephritis
 

Ähnlich wie Lupus nephritis

Afatinib for slidesshare
Afatinib for slidesshareAfatinib for slidesshare
Afatinib for slidesshareMarco Wu
 
Triple negative breast cancer-new developments
Triple negative breast cancer-new developmentsTriple negative breast cancer-new developments
Triple negative breast cancer-new developmentsNikolaosDiamantopoul1
 
Palumbo auto hsct in multiple myeloma n engl j med 2014
Palumbo auto hsct in multiple myeloma n engl j med 2014Palumbo auto hsct in multiple myeloma n engl j med 2014
Palumbo auto hsct in multiple myeloma n engl j med 2014Chandan K Das
 
Treatment of Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis ...
Treatment of Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis ...Treatment of Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis ...
Treatment of Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis ...WAidid
 
Newly approved agents in multiple myeloma: 2015 and beyond
Newly approved agents in multiple myeloma: 2015 and beyondNewly approved agents in multiple myeloma: 2015 and beyond
Newly approved agents in multiple myeloma: 2015 and beyondflasco_org
 
Changing Landscape of Treatment for Multiple Myeloma
Changing Landscape of Treatment for Multiple MyelomaChanging Landscape of Treatment for Multiple Myeloma
Changing Landscape of Treatment for Multiple Myelomaspa718
 
New perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Profe...
New perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Profe...New perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Profe...
New perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Profe...WAidid
 
Hepatobiliary tumor board (1)
Hepatobiliary tumor board (1)Hepatobiliary tumor board (1)
Hepatobiliary tumor board (1)madurai
 
Ohio State's 2016 ASH Review - BEST OF ASH 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PLASMA C...
Ohio State's 2016 ASH Review - BEST OF ASH 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PLASMA C...Ohio State's 2016 ASH Review - BEST OF ASH 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PLASMA C...
Ohio State's 2016 ASH Review - BEST OF ASH 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PLASMA C...OSUCCC - James
 
Integrating icosapent ethyl in clinical practice: which patients will benefits?
Integrating icosapent ethyl in clinical practice: which patients will benefits?Integrating icosapent ethyl in clinical practice: which patients will benefits?
Integrating icosapent ethyl in clinical practice: which patients will benefits?Sociedad Española de Cardiología
 
&lt;마더리스크> biomarkers of methylation
&lt;마더리스크> biomarkers of methylation &lt;마더리스크> biomarkers of methylation
&lt;마더리스크> biomarkers of methylation mothersafe
 
barrett's esophagus in SOT patients [1440].pptx
barrett's esophagus in SOT patients [1440].pptxbarrett's esophagus in SOT patients [1440].pptx
barrett's esophagus in SOT patients [1440].pptxdrpatel5794
 
Prostate cancer nemrock 2015 sanofi
Prostate cancer nemrock 2015   sanofiProstate cancer nemrock 2015   sanofi
Prostate cancer nemrock 2015 sanofiMohamed Abdulla
 
Treatment Of HCV in CKD Patients - Prof. Hussein El-Fishawy
Treatment Of HCV in CKD Patients - Prof. Hussein El-FishawyTreatment Of HCV in CKD Patients - Prof. Hussein El-Fishawy
Treatment Of HCV in CKD Patients - Prof. Hussein El-FishawyMNDU net
 
Hypofractionation in carcinoma prostate
Hypofractionation in carcinoma prostateHypofractionation in carcinoma prostate
Hypofractionation in carcinoma prostateNarayan Adhikari
 
Insulin resistance in adults with Type 1 Diabetes is associated with lower wi...
Insulin resistance in adults with Type 1 Diabetes is associated with lower wi...Insulin resistance in adults with Type 1 Diabetes is associated with lower wi...
Insulin resistance in adults with Type 1 Diabetes is associated with lower wi...Mikołaj Kamiński
 
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Can we refine the approach
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Can we refine the approachSoft Tissue Sarcoma, Can we refine the approach
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Can we refine the approachMohamed Abdulla
 

Ähnlich wie Lupus nephritis (20)

Update from CROI 2018: Focus on TB and Other Opportunistic Infections
Update from CROI 2018: Focus on TB and Other Opportunistic InfectionsUpdate from CROI 2018: Focus on TB and Other Opportunistic Infections
Update from CROI 2018: Focus on TB and Other Opportunistic Infections
 
Afatinib for slidesshare
Afatinib for slidesshareAfatinib for slidesshare
Afatinib for slidesshare
 
Radiologieinterventionnellechctdebaere
RadiologieinterventionnellechctdebaereRadiologieinterventionnellechctdebaere
Radiologieinterventionnellechctdebaere
 
Triple negative breast cancer-new developments
Triple negative breast cancer-new developmentsTriple negative breast cancer-new developments
Triple negative breast cancer-new developments
 
Palumbo auto hsct in multiple myeloma n engl j med 2014
Palumbo auto hsct in multiple myeloma n engl j med 2014Palumbo auto hsct in multiple myeloma n engl j med 2014
Palumbo auto hsct in multiple myeloma n engl j med 2014
 
Treatment of Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis ...
Treatment of Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis ...Treatment of Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis ...
Treatment of Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis ...
 
Newly approved agents in multiple myeloma: 2015 and beyond
Newly approved agents in multiple myeloma: 2015 and beyondNewly approved agents in multiple myeloma: 2015 and beyond
Newly approved agents in multiple myeloma: 2015 and beyond
 
Changing Landscape of Treatment for Multiple Myeloma
Changing Landscape of Treatment for Multiple MyelomaChanging Landscape of Treatment for Multiple Myeloma
Changing Landscape of Treatment for Multiple Myeloma
 
New perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Profe...
New perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Profe...New perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Profe...
New perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Profe...
 
Hepatobiliary tumor board (1)
Hepatobiliary tumor board (1)Hepatobiliary tumor board (1)
Hepatobiliary tumor board (1)
 
Ohio State's 2016 ASH Review - BEST OF ASH 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PLASMA C...
Ohio State's 2016 ASH Review - BEST OF ASH 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PLASMA C...Ohio State's 2016 ASH Review - BEST OF ASH 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PLASMA C...
Ohio State's 2016 ASH Review - BEST OF ASH 2015 MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND PLASMA C...
 
Integrating icosapent ethyl in clinical practice: which patients will benefits?
Integrating icosapent ethyl in clinical practice: which patients will benefits?Integrating icosapent ethyl in clinical practice: which patients will benefits?
Integrating icosapent ethyl in clinical practice: which patients will benefits?
 
&lt;마더리스크> biomarkers of methylation
&lt;마더리스크> biomarkers of methylation &lt;마더리스크> biomarkers of methylation
&lt;마더리스크> biomarkers of methylation
 
barrett's esophagus in SOT patients [1440].pptx
barrett's esophagus in SOT patients [1440].pptxbarrett's esophagus in SOT patients [1440].pptx
barrett's esophagus in SOT patients [1440].pptx
 
Prostate cancer nemrock 2015 sanofi
Prostate cancer nemrock 2015   sanofiProstate cancer nemrock 2015   sanofi
Prostate cancer nemrock 2015 sanofi
 
Treatment Of HCV in CKD Patients - Prof. Hussein El-Fishawy
Treatment Of HCV in CKD Patients - Prof. Hussein El-FishawyTreatment Of HCV in CKD Patients - Prof. Hussein El-Fishawy
Treatment Of HCV in CKD Patients - Prof. Hussein El-Fishawy
 
Neonatal Meningitis
Neonatal MeningitisNeonatal Meningitis
Neonatal Meningitis
 
Hypofractionation in carcinoma prostate
Hypofractionation in carcinoma prostateHypofractionation in carcinoma prostate
Hypofractionation in carcinoma prostate
 
Insulin resistance in adults with Type 1 Diabetes is associated with lower wi...
Insulin resistance in adults with Type 1 Diabetes is associated with lower wi...Insulin resistance in adults with Type 1 Diabetes is associated with lower wi...
Insulin resistance in adults with Type 1 Diabetes is associated with lower wi...
 
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Can we refine the approach
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Can we refine the approachSoft Tissue Sarcoma, Can we refine the approach
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Can we refine the approach
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Plant Fibres used as Surgical Dressings PDF.pdf
Plant Fibres used as Surgical Dressings PDF.pdfPlant Fibres used as Surgical Dressings PDF.pdf
Plant Fibres used as Surgical Dressings PDF.pdfDivya Kanojiya
 
Valproic Acid. (VPA). Antiseizure medication
Valproic Acid.  (VPA). Antiseizure medicationValproic Acid.  (VPA). Antiseizure medication
Valproic Acid. (VPA). Antiseizure medicationMohamadAlhes
 
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsHematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsMedicoseAcademics
 
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiGoogle
 
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdfPNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous SystemPresentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous SystemPrerana Jadhav
 
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!ibtesaam huma
 
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfLUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
systemic bacteriology (7)............pptx
systemic bacteriology (7)............pptxsystemic bacteriology (7)............pptx
systemic bacteriology (7)............pptxEyobAlemu11
 
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdfSGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdfHongBiThi1
 
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxPERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxdrashraf369
 
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxSYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxdrashraf369
 
epilepsy and status epilepticus for undergraduate.pptx
epilepsy and status epilepticus  for undergraduate.pptxepilepsy and status epilepticus  for undergraduate.pptx
epilepsy and status epilepticus for undergraduate.pptxMohamed Rizk Khodair
 
L1.INTRODUCTION to ENDOCRINOLOGY MEDICINE.pptx
L1.INTRODUCTION to ENDOCRINOLOGY MEDICINE.pptxL1.INTRODUCTION to ENDOCRINOLOGY MEDICINE.pptx
L1.INTRODUCTION to ENDOCRINOLOGY MEDICINE.pptxDr Bilal Natiq
 
medico legal aspects of wound - forensic medicine
medico legal aspects of wound - forensic medicinemedico legal aspects of wound - forensic medicine
medico legal aspects of wound - forensic medicinethanaram patel
 
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfPULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
ANTI-DIABETICS DRUGS - PTEROCARPUS AND GYMNEMA
ANTI-DIABETICS DRUGS - PTEROCARPUS AND GYMNEMAANTI-DIABETICS DRUGS - PTEROCARPUS AND GYMNEMA
ANTI-DIABETICS DRUGS - PTEROCARPUS AND GYMNEMADivya Kanojiya
 
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners
 
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxRadiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxDr. Dheeraj Kumar
 
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityCEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityHarshChauhan475104
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Plant Fibres used as Surgical Dressings PDF.pdf
Plant Fibres used as Surgical Dressings PDF.pdfPlant Fibres used as Surgical Dressings PDF.pdf
Plant Fibres used as Surgical Dressings PDF.pdf
 
Valproic Acid. (VPA). Antiseizure medication
Valproic Acid.  (VPA). Antiseizure medicationValproic Acid.  (VPA). Antiseizure medication
Valproic Acid. (VPA). Antiseizure medication
 
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsHematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
 
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
 
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdfPNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
 
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous SystemPresentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
Presentation on Parasympathetic Nervous System
 
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfLUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
 
systemic bacteriology (7)............pptx
systemic bacteriology (7)............pptxsystemic bacteriology (7)............pptx
systemic bacteriology (7)............pptx
 
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdfSGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
 
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxPERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
 
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxSYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
 
epilepsy and status epilepticus for undergraduate.pptx
epilepsy and status epilepticus  for undergraduate.pptxepilepsy and status epilepticus  for undergraduate.pptx
epilepsy and status epilepticus for undergraduate.pptx
 
L1.INTRODUCTION to ENDOCRINOLOGY MEDICINE.pptx
L1.INTRODUCTION to ENDOCRINOLOGY MEDICINE.pptxL1.INTRODUCTION to ENDOCRINOLOGY MEDICINE.pptx
L1.INTRODUCTION to ENDOCRINOLOGY MEDICINE.pptx
 
medico legal aspects of wound - forensic medicine
medico legal aspects of wound - forensic medicinemedico legal aspects of wound - forensic medicine
medico legal aspects of wound - forensic medicine
 
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfPULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
 
ANTI-DIABETICS DRUGS - PTEROCARPUS AND GYMNEMA
ANTI-DIABETICS DRUGS - PTEROCARPUS AND GYMNEMAANTI-DIABETICS DRUGS - PTEROCARPUS AND GYMNEMA
ANTI-DIABETICS DRUGS - PTEROCARPUS AND GYMNEMA
 
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
 
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxRadiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
 
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityCEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
 

Lupus nephritis

  • 1. Journal of American Society of Nephrology 20:1103-1112,2009 SPEAKER MODERATOR DR. ANKUR NANDAN VARSHNEY PROF. N. K. SINGH
  • 2. Most serious manifestations of SLE  It present as microscopic hematuria and proteinuria (>500 mg /24 hrs)  Approx half patients develop nephrotic syndrome  Hypertension is common  If left untreated , virtually all patient of DPGN develops ESRD within 2 years of diagnosis Al Arfaraj AS et al. Rheumatol Int2009 Jul;29(9):1057-67
  • 3. Class I: Minimal Mesangial Lupus Nephritis Class II:Mesangial Proliferative Lupus Nephritis Class III: Focal Lupus Nephritis Class III (A): Active lesions—focal proliferative lupus nephritis Class III (A/C): Active and chronic lesions—focal proliferative and sclerosing lupus nephritis Class III (C): Chronic inactive lesions with glomerular scars—focal sclerosing lupus nephritis Class IV: Diffuse Lupus Nephritis class IV-S (A): Active lesions-diffuse segmental proliferative lupus nephritis class IV-G (A): Active lesions-diffuse global proliferative lupus nephritis class IV-S(A/C): Active and chronic lesions-diffuse segmental proliferative and sclerosing lupus nephritis class IV-G(A/C): Active and chronic lesions-diffuse global proliferative and sclerosing lupus nephritis class IV-S(C): Chronic inactive lesions with scars-diffuse segmental sclerosing lupus nephritis class IV-G(C): diffuse global sclerosing lupus nephritis ClassV: Membranous Lupus Nephritis Class VI:Advanced Sclerotic Lupus Nephritis 90% of glomeruli globally sclerosed without residual activity.  Weening JJ et al. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol2004. 15 (2): 241–50.
  • 4.  High dose immunosuppression is required  Cytotoxic agents are given along with high dose steroids  Treatment consists of 1. Induction phase 2. Maintenance phase
  • 5. Induction  CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE Dose = 500- 750 mg/m2 iv monthly for 6 months ( NIH) 500 mg iv 2 weekly for 6 cycles (European)  MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL 2 – 3 gm/daily until remission occur  High dose steroids are used along  Therapeutic responses begin after 3-16 weeks of therapy Maintenance :- 1. MYCOPHENOLATE 1.5- 2 gm /daily 2. AZATHIOPRINE 2mg/kg/DAY  Impovement in 80% of individuals occur in a span of 1-2 years (Chan TM. The American Journal of Medicine2012;125:642-648)
  • 6. A nitrogen mustard alkylating agent from the oxazophorines group  Mechanism : a metabolite called phosphoramide mustard which forms cross links both between and within DNA strands at guanine N-7 position leading to cell death  Side effects- infections ,bone marrow suppression, ovarian and testicular failure*, alopecia, hemorrhagic cystitis, bladder carcinoma, teratogenic, malignancy, nausea, diahorrea *54% by McDermott et al. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55: 224-229 *26% by Mok CC et al. Arthritis and rheumatism 1998;41:831-837
  • 7. A prodrug of mycophenolic acid  Mechanism : inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase which helps in purine synthesis needed for growth of B cells and T cells  Side effects – infections, bone marrow suppression, lymphoproliferative disorders, alopecia, GI symptoms, hypokalemia, hypercholesterolemia, teratogenic
  • 8. Journal of American Society of Nephrology 20:1103- 1112,2009
  • 9. Chan TM , Li FK , Tang CSO, et al. Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med.2000;343;1156-1162 showed that prednisolone + MMF and prednislone + cyclophosphamide are equally effective (n=42)  Ong LM , Hooi LS , Lim TO, et al .randomized controlled trial of pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis . Nephrology,2005; 10; 504-510 showed that prednisolone + MMF and prednisolone + pulse cyclophosphamide are equally effective (n=44)  Ginzler EM , Dooley MA , Aranow C , et al. Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353 ;2219-2228 showed that prednisolone + MMF is more effective than prednisolone + pulse cyclophosphamide (n=140 )
  • 10. A prospective, randomized, open label, parallel – group, multicentre study  Hypothesis was stated that more patient with lupus nephritis would respond to MMF than to Cyclophosphamide during 24 weeks
  • 11. Patients aged between 12 yrs and 75 yrs  Diagnosis of SLE by ACR criteria (Hochberg MC. Arthritis Rheum 40:1725,1997)  Lupus nephritis( active, active/chronic) as confirmed by renal biopsy as ISN class III , IV-S, IV-G, V, III+V ,IV+V within 6 months before randomization  Must have clinically significant level of proteinuria ( atleast 2g/day)
  • 12. Treatment with either MMF or cyclophosphamide within the previous year  Continuous dialysis for > 2 weeks before randomization or anticipated duration longer than 8 weeks  Pancreatitis  Gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 6 months or active peptic ulcer within 3 months  Severe viral infection  Severe cardiovascular disease  Bone marrow insufficiency with cytopenias not attributable to SLE  Current infection requiring iv antibiotics
  • 13. Stratified by race and biopsy class, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with MMF and cyclophosphamide in a ratio of 1:1  Cyclophosphamide was given in monthly pulses of 0.5- 1 g/m2 as per NIH protocol  Oral MMF was given twice daily as 0.5 g in first week, 1.0 g in 2nd week, 1.5 g in 3rd week. Dose were decreased to 2 g /day in response to adverse effect  Both groups received oral prednisone
  • 14. Induction period was defined as 24 weeks based on prior studies to predict outcome and minimizing adverse effect.(conteras et al;NEJM350:971-980,2004. Houssiau et al;arthritis rheu 50:3934-3940,2004)  Patients were assessed at 2nd week , 4th week and then every 4 weekly  Patients were withdrawn if 1. At week 12 there serum creatinine was >30% above baseline on two successive measurements separated by at least 12 weeks 2. When they required other immunosuppressive therapy 3. If MMF dosage fell below 2 g/day for >14 days or was stopped for >7 days
  • 15. Patient disposition. *Hepatitis/cytomegalovirus infection (n = 16) or other illness (n = 4). Appel G B et al. JASN 2009;20:1103-1112 ©2009 by American Society of Nephrology
  • 16. Characteristic MMF(n=185) Cyclophosphami Total(n=370) de Gender (n [%]) male 28 (15.1) 29 (15.7) 57 (15.4) female 157 (84.9) 156 (84.3) 313 (84.6) Race (n [%]) white 75 (40.5) 72 (38.9) 147 (39.7) Asian 62 (33.5) 61 (33.0) 123 (33.2) other 48 (25.9) 52 (28.1) 100 (27.0) Ethnicity (n [%]) Hispanic 64 (34.6) 67 (36.2) 131 (35.4) non- 121 (65.4) 118 (63.8) 239 (64.6) Hispanic
  • 17. Characteristic MMF Cyclophosphamide Total Region (n [%]) Asia 57 (30.8) 60 (32.4) 117 (31.6) Latin America 56 (30.3) 50 (27.0) 106 (28.6) United 37 (20.0) 38 (20.5) 75 (20.3) States/Canada rest of world 35 (18.9) 37 (20.0) 72 (19.5) Renal biopsy class (n [%]) III/III + V 32 (17.3) 26 (14.1) 58 (15.7) IV/IV + V 124 (67.0) 128 (69.2) 252 (68.1) V only 29 (15.7) 31 (16.8) 60 (16.2) Scarring on renal 66 (35.7) 56 (30.3) 122 (33.0) biopsy (n [%]) Serum creatinine 108.6 ± 1.2 92.7 ± 1.0 (56.9 ± 100.6 ± 1.1 (μmol/L [mg/dl]; (97.2 ± 1.1) 0.6) (80.0 ± 0.9) mean ± SD) Urine 4.1 ± 4.2 4.1 ± 3.2 4.1 ± 3.7 protein/creatinine ratio (mean ± SD)
  • 18. Characteristic MMF Cyclophosphamide Total Range of GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2; n [%]) ≥90 80 (43.2) 86 (46.7) 166 (45.0) ≥60 to <90 53 (28.6) 52 (28.3) 105 (28.5) ≥30 to <60 32 (17.3) 34 (18.5) 66 (17.9) <30 20 (10.8) 12 (6.5) 32 (8.7) Range of anti-dsDNA antibody titer (IU/ml; n [%]) <30 (negative) 32 (18.4) 23 (13.5) 55 (15.9) 30 to 60 (low 25 (14.4) 24 (14.0) 49 (14.2) positive) >60 to 200 52 (29.9) 40 (23.4) 92 (26.7) (positive) >200 (strong 65 (37.4) 84 (49.1) 149 (43.2) positive) Range of C3 concentration (g/L; n [%]) >1.8 1 (0.6) 1 (0.6) 2 (0.6) 0.9 to 1.8 50 (28.4) 34 (19.5) 84 (24.0) (normal) <0.9 (low) 125 (71.0) 139 (79.9) 264 (75.4)
  • 19. Characteristic MMF(n=185) Cyclophosphami Total de(n=185) ( n=370) Range of C4 concentration (g/L; n [%]) >0.47 2 (1.1) 1 (0.6) 3 (0.9) 0.16 to 70 (39.8) 47 (27.2) 117 (33.5) 0.47 (normal) <0.16 104 (59.1) 125 (72.3) 229 (65.6) Age at 32.4 ± 11.2 31.3 ± 10.3 31.9 ± 10.7 enrollment (yr; mean ± SD) Age at diagnosis 30.2 ± 11.0 28.8 ± 10.2 29.5 ± 10.6 of lupus nephritis (yr; mean ± SD) Time since 1.0 (1 to 21) 1.0 (1 to 23) 1.0 (1 to 23) diagnosis of lupus nephritis (yr; median [range])
  • 20. RESPONSE : defined as 1. Decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio to < 3 in patients with baseline range >3 2. By > 50% decrease in patients with subnephrotic baseline protein/creatinine ratio (<3) 3. Stabilization or improvement in serum creatinine  NON RESPONDER : defined as 1. Received pulse methylprednisolone for any renal or extra renal flare 2. Who did not complete 24 week induction therapy
  • 21. Key secondary end points included ◦ the proportion of patients who achieved complete remission, defined as return to normal serum creatinine, urine protein <0.5 g/d, and inactive urinary sediment (<5 white blood cells per high-power field and <5 red blood cells per high-power field, and a reading of lower than 2 on dipstick and absence of red cell casts); ◦ proportion of patients who achieved any one of these renal outcomes; combined renal and extrarenal remission, defined as absence of A and B scores on the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group system; ◦ mean change on the Safety of Exogenous Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment/Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index
  • 22. Response rates of study population and by racial group. Appel G B et al. JASN 2009;20:1103-1112 ©2009 by American Society of Nephrology
  • 23. Parameter MMF ( n= 185) Cyclophosphami Odd’s Ratio de ( n= 185 ) (95% CI) Responders with 88 (56.4) 83 (53.9) 1.1(0.7 to 1.8) renal biopsy class III or IV Patients with 16 (55.2) 15(48.4) class V Renal remission criteria Serum creatinine 130 (70.3) 125 (67.6) 2.7(-6.7 to 12.1) Urine protein 44 (23.8) 50 (27) -3.2(-12.1to 5.6) Urine sediments 58 (31.4) 44 (23.8) 7.6(-1.5to16.6) All three 16 (8.6) 15 (8.1) 0.5(-5.1to6.2)
  • 24. parameter MMF Cyclophosphami Total de Renal and extra 54(29.7) 45(24.9) 4.8(4.3 to 14) renal remission Absence of BILAG score SELENA-SLEDAI -6.2 +/- 10.1 -6.6 +/-8 change in score from baseline to endpoint Anti-DsDNA 117(67.2) 124(72.5) >60 at baseline Anti-DsDNA>60 72(41.4) 91(53.2) at end point Low C3 at 125(71) 139(79.9) baseline Low C3 at end 70(39.8) 90(51.7) point Low C4 at 104(59.1) 125(72.3) baseline Low C4 at end 51(29) 72(41.6) point
  • 25. Parameter MMF (n= 185) Cyclophosphamide ( n= 185) Completed 24 week open label induction 150 (81.1) 156 (84.3) phase Withdrawn prematurely 35 (18.9) 29 (15.7) Reasons for withdrawl Adverse event 21 (60) 12(41.4) Deteoriation with respect to serum 0 2 (6.9) creatinine after 12 and 16 week Dosage reduction of MMF <2g/d for >14 1(2.9) 0 day Lost to follow up 1(2.9) 2(6.9) Patient died 3 (8.6) 1(3.4) Withdrew consent 6 (17.1) 5 (17.2) Physician decision 1 (2.9) 3 (10.3) Sponsor decision 2 (5.7) 1 (3.4) Non compliance 0 1 (3.4) Reason not noted 0 2 (6.9)
  • 26. Parameter MMF (n=184) Cyclophosphamide (n=180) Deaths 9 (4.9) 5 (2.8) Withdrawals as a result 24 (13.0) 13 (7.2) of AEs All AEs 177 (96.2) 171 (95.0) diarrhea 52 (28.3) 23 (12.8) headache 38 (20.7) 47 (26.1) peripheral edema 35 (19.0) 30 (16.7) arthralgia 29 (15.8) 43 (23.9) nausea 27 (14.7) 82 (45.6) hypertension 26 (14.1) 25 (13.9)
  • 27. Parameter MMF Cyclophosphamide 25 (13.6) 29 (16.1) nasopharyngitis vomiting 25 (13.6) 68 (37.8) cough 24 (13.0) 16 (8.9) anemia 23 (12.5) 12 (6.7) alopecia 20 (10.9) 64 (35.6) abdominal pain 19 (10.3) 13 (7.2) back pain 19 (10.3) 16 (8.9) muscle spasms 19 (10.3) 17 (9.4) rash 19 (10.3) 21 (11.7) urinary tract infection 19 (10.3) 17 (9.4)
  • 28. MMF did not show any superiority over cyclophosphamide for induction therapy for lupus nephritis  However, there were important racial differences as the Blacks and Hispanics who are at increased risk of aggressive disease, responded more to MMF than cyclophosphamide  Though the most common side effects were infections and GI side effects that occur comparatively in both groups, alopecia an undesirable side effect occur mainly in cyclophosphamide group
  • 29. Convenience of twice daily oral medication versus hospitalization for monthly infusion for cyclophosphamide was not addressed  Impact of cyclophosphamide to cause ovarian dysfunction on women of child bearing age was not discussed  24 weeks may be too short to differentiate between treatments as disease may continue to improve and side effects may continue to emerge later with cyclophosphamide (Ioannidis et al. Kidney Int 57:258-264,2000)
  • 30. Conteras et al. N Engl J Med.2004;350:971-980 Showed in a randomized trial (n=59) that 72 month survival rate free of renal failure higher in MMF and AZA group than quarterly cyclophosphamide group  Houssiau et al. Ann Rheum Dis.2010;69:2083- 2089 showed in a randomized trial (n=105) that MMF not more effective than AZA in prolonging time to renal flare
  • 31. Dooley et al.N Eng J med 2011;365:1886-95
  • 32. Mycophenolate was superior to azathioprine in maintaining a renal response to treatment and preventing relapse in patients with lupus nephritis who had a response to induction therapy
  • 33. LUNAR study: a trial on stage III and IV lupus nephritis showed that add on rituximab had no clinical impact in patients treated with corticosteroid and MMF.(Furie et al.Ann Rheum Dis.2010;69(suppl 3):549a  EXPLORER study : Rituximab(anti CD20 monoclonal antibody) showed an impact on serological parameters but not on clinical efficacy in patients with active nonrenal lupus.(Merrill et al.Lupus.2011;20:709-716)
  • 34. A phase III trial with Belimumab (a monoclonal antibody against the ligand of BlyS/BAFF receptor on B cells that promotes B cell survival and differentiation to plasmablasts) showed efficacy with extrarenal lupus but there is insufficient data in lupus nephritis.(Navarra et al.Lancet.2011;377:721- 731)
  • 35.  On the basis of above studies, physicians may consider MMF as an alternative to Cyclophosphamide in induction treatment of lupus nephritis depending upon: 1. Adverse effects 2. Socioeconomic factors 3. Racial factors (Chan TM. The American Journal of Medicine2012;125:642- 648)