Lec 14 Authorship Issues

•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•

1 gefällt mir•1,105 views

Janet Stemwedel

Bildung

Authorship issues. Phil 133 – Ethics in Science San José State University

Lecture overview: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Why does the author line matter? ,[object Object],[object Object]

How do you read the author line? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

How do you read the author line? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

How do you read the author line? ,[object Object],[object Object]

Problematic situations: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Problematic situations: ,[object Object]

ICMJE authorship standards: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

ICMJE authorship standards: ,[object Object],[object Object]

Explicit authorship: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Peer review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Peer review ,[object Object],[object Object]

Peer review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

What Is Peer Review?

Jerry Stovall

Evaluating Science Literature

kjurecki

Review of related literature

Davao Institute for Educational Research Development & Consultancy

Lesson 13 synthesizing information from relavant literature

mjlobetos

Plagiarism lesson

Jimnaira Abanto

Ethics of Scientific publication

Aboul Ella Hassanien

Literaturereviewinresearch 130507225729-phpapp01

KizitoLubano2

POL SOC 360 Process Problems Social Research

atrantham

In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.

The pitfalls of “salami slicing” focus on quality and not quantity of publica...

Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)

3.rm the literature review

SURENDRABABU BOYELLA

Literature Reviews and APA style

phdserena

PhD Assistance gives you tips to Identify Research Gaps in the Literature Review for writing a PhD dissertation. A Research Gap is a Topic or field for which insufficient data restrict the ability to conclude a research question. If we are looking for a research issue, what is the healthiest beverage for humans? You can discover multiple studies and potential answers to the questions. Research gap identification eventually makes way for new and exciting research. PhD Assistance offers UK Dissertation Research Topics Services. When you Order Dissertation Services at PhD Assistance, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, Always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts. Learn More:http://bit.ly/3aomOF3 Contact Us: For Any Queries : Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/ UK NO: +44–1143520021 India No: +91–4448137070 WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446 Email: info@phdassistance.com

How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a PhD Dissertation Literature ...

PhD Assistance

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

nethisip13

Lecture 32: Open Peer Review

Jessica Laccetti

Composed of discussions of facts and principles to which the present study is related They may be classified as: Local, if the inquiry was conducted in the Philippines; and Foreign, if conducted in foreign lands RELATED STUDIES Importance, Purposes, and Functions of Related Literature and Studies A survey or review of related literature and studies is very important because such reviewed literature and studies serve as a foundation of the proposed study. This is because related literature and studies guide the researcher in pursuing his research venture. Importance, Purposes, and Functions of Related Literature and Studies

Review of related literature

Jan Ine

Theory and the review of related literature

Jesullyna Manuel

Locating & Reviewing Literature

Dyah chan

Introduction to Peer review, updated 2015-03-05

Wouter Gerritsma

Locating and reviewing the literature

Lance Gerard G. Abalos LPT, MA

Presentació realitzada per Remedios Melero en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).

How to get peer reviewed

Universitat de Barcelona - Facultat d’Informació i Mitjans Audiovisuals

Was ist angesagt? (20)

What Is Peer Review?

Evaluating Science Literature

Review of related literature

Lesson 13 synthesizing information from relavant literature

Plagiarism lesson

Ethics of Scientific publication

Literaturereviewinresearch 130507225729-phpapp01

POL SOC 360 Process Problems Social Research

The pitfalls of “salami slicing” focus on quality and not quantity of publica...

3.rm the literature review

Literature Reviews and APA style

How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a PhD Dissertation Literature ...

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Lecture 32: Open Peer Review

Review of related literature

Theory and the review of related literature

Locating & Reviewing Literature

Introduction to Peer review, updated 2015-03-05

Locating and reviewing the literature

How to get peer reviewed

Ähnlich wie Lec 14 Authorship Issues

Link v1.ethics in-research-and-publication-brochure

eder paul ayala llacsahuanga

Scientific Papers and Communications

Janet Stemwedel

Apa manual presentation

Dr. Hina Kaynat

APA manual PPT Chapter - 1

Authorship

ethics.pdf

publication.pptx

As a system for advancing knowledge, science requires that investigators share their findings with the rest of the scientific community. Only if one’s findings are made public can knowledge accumulate as researchers build on, extend, and refine one another’s work. As we discussed in Chapter 1, a defining characteristic of science is that, over the long haul, it is self-correcting; and self-correction can occur only if research findings are widely disseminated. To this end, informing others of the outcome of one’s work is a critical part of the research process. In this chapter we will examine how researchers distribute their work to other scientists, students, and the general public. Because the effective communication of one’s research nearly always involves writing, much of this chapter will be devoted to scientific writing. We will discuss criteria for good scientific writing and help you improve your own writing skills. We will also examine the guidelines that behavioral researchers use to prepare their research reports, a system of rules known as APA style. To begin, however, we’ll take a look at the three main routes by which behavioral scientists disseminate their research to others. HOW SCIENTIFIC FINDINGS ARE DISSEMINATED Researchers disseminate the results of their investigations among themselves in three ways: journal publications, presentations at professional meetings, and personal contact. Journal Publication Journal publication is the primary route by which research findings are disseminated to the scientific community. Scientific journals serve not only as a means of communication among researchers (most researchers subscribe to one or more journals in their fields) but also as the basis for the permanent storage of research findings in library collections. Traditionally, journals were published only in printed form, but today many journals are published in digital format as PDF files and on the Internet. Before most journals will publish a research paper, it must undergo the process of peer review. In peer review, a paper is evaluated by other scientists who have expertise in the topic under investigation. Although various journals use slightly different systems of peer review, the general process is as follows. 1. The author submits copies of his or her paper to the editor of a relevant journal. (The editor’s name and address typically appear on the inside front cover of the journal and on the journal’s Web site.) Although a few journals still ask authors to submit paper copies of their manuscripts, most journals have on-line systems by which authors submit their work by sending word processing files. Authors are permitted to submit a particular piece of work to only one journal at a time. 2. The editor (or an associate editor designated by the editor) then sends a copy of the paper to two or more peer reviewers who are known to be experts in the area of research covered in the paper. ...

As a system for advancing knowledge, science requires that investi.docx

fredharris32

Writ 340 natural sciences dr. muniz

SALU18

Contributorship credit 23_august2019

Alex Holcombe

Authorship dispute, Medical journalism, and Research ethics

Amir R. Kachooei, MD

Publication Ethics

Ayurveda Network, BHU

Ethics & Review of the Literature in Research .

RaedMusili1

Presentation to ethics workshop-104137 (1).ppt

MaheshKalyanshetti2

Intro to research

Sherfil Kate Jandog

Publication ethics

SameerKhasbage

محاضرة (أخلاقيات البحث العلمي) د.فضيلة العنزي

مركز البحوث الأقسام العلمية

The Ethics of Scientific Paper Writing

Cognibrain Healthcare

Literature Review © 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 1 Literature Review Program Transcript [MUSIC PLAYING] NARRATOR: Have you ever thought about a literature review as representing your intellectual heritage or intellectual genealogy? In his exploration of the purpose of a literature review, Dr. Patton explains this interesting perspective. He also points out common errors to avoid when undertaking a literature review. MICHAEL QUINN PATTON: One of the things that we do as scholar practitioners is look at the knowledge created by other people. And we draw on that knowledge as a way of positioning our own work and understanding where our contribution to knowledge, our own research, fits in that larger tradition. This is often referred to as the literature review. And the way that you go about knowing the knowledge that others have generated, that you're going to build on and contribute to, is to conduct a literature review. I tend not to like that terminology, because it sounds like the purpose is to review the literature. Literature review is actually a means to another end. And it's that end, it's that purpose of conducting the literature review that I want to focus on. The purpose is for you to understand your intellectual heritage, your intellectual genealogy. Anytime we undertake an inquiry into a particular issue, we are building on the knowledge of others. And we need to know what that knowledge is. It's part of our obligation as scholars, is to understand what work has come before us, what concepts we've inherited, what methods we've inherited, what measures we've inherited. Some of which we've adopted, some of which we've parted from. But we need to know that. Because at the end of a program of study, a master's degree, a program of doctoral inquiry, you're going to be expected to be able to locate your work within that tradition. And so it means that you need to be able to establish the people who formulated the basic distinctions that you're drawing on. Let me share with you some of the mistakes that I, from my point of view, find students engaging in when they undertake the literature review. One of these is to simply do an internet search to see how many articles they can find on a topic. Where they think that the game is how many citations you can come up with to show that you've done the literature review. This isn't a quantitative game. It's not something where the number of sources is important. It's the quality of those sources and your engagement with them, that you are able to engage with what other people have done and understand what's relevant, what's not relevant to your own area of inquiry. So that you're positioning yourself out of those traditions that others have engaged in. Literature Review © 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 2 A second error is to think that the game is to position your work as unique. It is to try to find something that nobod ...

Literature Review © 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. .docx

croysierkathey

Article writing mid

Eryansyah Nasir

Ähnlich wie Lec 14 Authorship Issues (20)

Link v1.ethics in-research-and-publication-brochure

Scientific Papers and Communications

Apa manual presentation

APA manual PPT Chapter - 1

Authorship

ethics.pdf

publication.pptx

As a system for advancing knowledge, science requires that investi.docx

Writ 340 natural sciences dr. muniz

Contributorship credit 23_august2019

Authorship dispute, Medical journalism, and Research ethics

Publication Ethics

Ethics & Review of the Literature in Research .

Presentation to ethics workshop-104137 (1).ppt

Intro to research

Publication ethics

محاضرة (أخلاقيات البحث العلمي) د.فضيلة العنزي

The Ethics of Scientific Paper Writing

Article writing mid

Mehr von Janet Stemwedel

Climategate and scientific methodology

Janet Stemwedel

P160 Kuhn and his Critics

Janet Stemwedel

P160 Duhem and Quine

Janet Stemwedel

P160 Hempel, Hume, Deduction, and Induction

Janet Stemwedel

Lect10 Human Subjects: History

Janet Stemwedel

Lect11 Human Subjects: Regulations

Janet Stemwedel

Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues

Janet Stemwedel

Lec15 Patents and Intellectual Property

Janet Stemwedel

Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue

Janet Stemwedel

Explanation classroomversion

Janet Stemwedel

P160 antirealismclassroomversion

Janet Stemwedel

P160 naturalismclassroomlect

Janet Stemwedel

Feminist Critiques of Science

Janet Stemwedel

Indirect-table Analysis

Janet Stemwedel

Truth table analysis

Janet Stemwedel

Translating English to Propositional Logic

Janet Stemwedel

P160 Kuhn classroom Lecture 2

Janet Stemwedel

Propositional logic

Janet Stemwedel

Kuhn: Paradigms and Normal Science

Janet Stemwedel

Syntax and semantics of propositional logic

Janet Stemwedel

Mehr von Janet Stemwedel (20)

Climategate and scientific methodology

P160 Kuhn and his Critics

P160 Duhem and Quine

P160 Hempel, Hume, Deduction, and Induction

Lect10 Human Subjects: History

Lect11 Human Subjects: Regulations

Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues

Lec15 Patents and Intellectual Property

Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue

Explanation classroomversion

P160 antirealismclassroomversion

P160 naturalismclassroomlect

Feminist Critiques of Science

Indirect-table Analysis

Truth table analysis

Translating English to Propositional Logic

P160 Kuhn classroom Lecture 2

Propositional logic

Kuhn: Paradigms and Normal Science

Syntax and semantics of propositional logic

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf

Jayanti Pande

psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx

PoojaSen20

1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf

QucHHunhnh

Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..

Disha Kariya

Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes

Celine George

Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx

negromaestrong

fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing

TeacherCyreneCayanan

In BC’s nearly-decade-old “new” curriculum, the curricular competencies describe the processes that students are expected to develop in areas of learning such as mathematics. They reflect the “Do” in the “Know-Do-Understand” model. Under the “Communicating” header falls the curricular competency “Explain and justify mathematical ideas and decisions.” Note that it contains two processes: “Explain mathematical ideas” and “Justify mathematical decisions.” I have broken it down into its separate parts in order to understand--or reveal--its meaning. The first part is commonplace in classrooms. By now, BC math teachers—and students—understand that “Explain mathematical ideas” means more than “Show your work.” Teachers consistently ask “What did you do?” and “How do you know?” This process is about retelling, not just of steps but of thinking. The second part happens less frequently. Think back to the last time that you observed a student make—a necessary precursor to justify—a mathematical decision. “Justify” is about defending. Like “explain,” it involves reasoning; unlike “explain,” it also involves opinion and debate. In order to reinterpret the curricular competency “Explain and justify mathematical ideas and decisions,” I will continue to take apart its constituent part “Justify mathematical decisions” and carefully examine the term “mathematical decisions.” What, exactly, is a “mathematical decision”? Below, I will categorize answers to this question. These categories, and the provided examples, may help to suggest new opportunities for students to justify.

Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf

Chris Hunter

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17

Celine George

Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting

TechSoup

Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17

Celine George

Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics

TechSoup

Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity

GeoBlogs

Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104

misteraugie

Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf

AyushMahapatra5

The global implications of DORA and NIS 2 Directive are significant, extending beyond the European Union. Amongst others, the webinar covers: • DORA and its Implications • Nis 2 Directive and its Implications • How to leverage directive and regulation as a marketing tool and competitive advantage • How to use new compliance framework to request additional budget Presenters: Christophe Mazzola - Senior Cyber Governance Consultant Armed with endless Excel files, a meme catalog worthy of the best X'os (formerly twittos), and a risk register to make your favorite risk manager jealous, I swapped my computer scientist cape a few years ago for that of a (cyber) threat hunter with the honorary title of CISO. Ah, and I am also a quadruple senior certified ISO27001/2/5, Pas mal non ? C'est francais. Malcolm Xavier Malcolm Xavier has been working in the Digital Industry for over 18 Years now. He has worked with Global Clients in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom. He has achieved Many Professional Certifications Like CISSP, Google Cloud Practitioner, TOGAF, Azure Cloud, ITIL v3 etc. His core competencies include IT strategy, cybersecurity, IT infrastructure management, data center migration and consolidation, data protection and compliance, risk management and governance, and IS program development and management. Date: April 25, 2024 Tags: Information Security, Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Find out more about ISO training and certification services Training: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) - EN | PECB NIS 2 Directive - EN | PECB Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars Article: https://pecb.com/article Whitepaper: https://pecb.com/whitepaper ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information about PECB: Website: https://pecb.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/ Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact

PECB

Basic Civil Engineering notes first year Notes Building notes Selection of site for Building Layout of a Building What is Burjis, Mutam Building Bye laws Basic Concept of sunlight ventilation in building National Building Code of India Set back or building line Types of Buildings Floor Space Index (F.S.I) Institutional Vs Educational Building Components & function Sills, Lintels, Cantilever Doors, Windows and Ventilators Types of Foundation AND THEIR USES Plinth Area Shallow and Deep Foundation Super Built-up & carpet area Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R) RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete RCC VS PCC

Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx

Denish Jangid

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx

VishalSingh1417

Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.

MateoGardella

Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf

agholdier

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf

psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx

1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf

Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..

Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes

Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx

fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing

Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17

Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting

Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17

Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics

Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity

Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104

Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact

Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx

Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.

Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf