In a Seminar on Women Participation in Mahatma Gandhi NREGA organized by the Department of Panchayats & Rural Development on 20th March, 2013 at Jorasanko Thakurbari, Shri S. M. Vijayanand, Additional Secretary in the Ministry of rural Development, Government of India made this presentation based on the Kerala experience in women participation in MGNREGA.
1. MGNREGA AND WOMEN
S.M. VIJAYANAND
ADDITIONAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
2. INTRODUCTION
A well structured Act
An Act of the activists
Pro-people, pro-poor, pro-women
Only developmental legislation giving central place
to Panchayats especially at the village level
Only programme where the content actually has to
emanate from the grassroots
The core objective of the Act is “enhancement of
livelihood security”.
3. GENDER SENSITIVE FEATURES
OF THE ACT AND THE SCHEME
One-third of employment to women
Equality of wages
Mandate to provide facilities at worksite
including crèche and carer for children
Planning mainly by Gram Sabha and Gram
Panchayat which are more people friendly
Work to be provided within 5 km. distance
4. GENDER SENSITIVE FEATURES
OF THE ACT AND THE SCHEME
(contd…..)
Focus on works which are doable by women
Absence of contractors
One-third of non-official members of the
Employment Guarantee Council at State and
Central level to be women
Importance given to transparency and Social
Audit
Provision for gender sensitive schedule of
rates
5. THE KERALA EXPERIENCE
A. BACKGROUND
Asset focus in wage employment programmes
from days of NREP
Works organized by middle-men – “benami”
contractors
Need to break the system and make it rooted in
people
Need to eliminate patronage and corruption
Statesman like political decision to implement
the Act in letter and spirit
6. THE KERALA EXPERIENCE
B. INVOLVEMENT OF KUDUMBASHREE
Awareness generation
Mobilization people for job cards
Identification of works
Organizing works
Getting the workers
Providing the mate
Providing facilities
Follow up on payments
7. THE KERALA EXPERIENCE
C. POSITIVE FEATURES
Zero corruption
Dignity of public work
Never-ever-worked women joining the
work force
Succour to the needy
High level of personal savings
Real financial inclusion
8. THE KERALA EXPERIENCE
Positive spending of savings for
health, education of children, for assets
with value, etc.
Increase in intra-household status
Enhanced feeling of fraternity
Few instances of public action
Convergence with livelihood activities of
SHGs
Land development for vegetable/paddy
cultivation
9. THE KERALA EXPERIENCE
D. CHALLENGES
Not yet rights-based
Perverse incentives affecting quality of
work
Issues regarding choice of mate
Co-option by Panchayats
Co-option by political parties
Threat of greedy middle-men
Negative perceptions
10. THE KERALA EXPERIENCE
E. NEXT STEPS
Norms for selecting mate
Organizing labour groups and enhancing their
skills
Upgrading mates to barefoot engineers
Linking works to Natural Resource Management
Community-based Social Audit
Moving on to Anti-Poverty Sub-Plan through the
SHG network
11. LESSONS
Need to engender
To reduce corruption
To make it really demand-based
For poverty/livelihood impact
How to engender
Link with NRLM ab initio
Reach out proactively
Formally incorporate it into processes and procedures
Make work standards gender-sensitive
Structure labour groups as sub-system of SHGs
Improve skills in a phased manner
Link up with the ICDs system especially for looking after small
children
Identify tools for making them easier for women to use
12. LESSONS
How to increase women participation
Combat Cultural Factors
Sensitive use of Community Resource Persons
Images and lessons from other States
Spread the concept of “public work”
Sensitize PRIs – especially, elected women representatives
Try Action Research on the lines of UP experiments of UN
Women
13. CONCLUSION
For deeper processes
For cleaner practices
For larger social and economic benefits
For all these, consciously engender MGNREGS