SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 4
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
WOMACTM Questionnaire
Objectives : The WOMAC™ Index is a disease-specific, tri-dimensional self-
administered questionnaire, for assessing health status and health outcomes in osteoarthritis
of the knee and/or hip.
Target population : Patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.
Method of use :
The questionnaire contains 24 questions, targeting areas of pain, stiffness and physical
function, and can be completed in less than 5 minutes. Usually patient self-administered, the
Index is amenable to electronic data capture (EDC) formats using mouse-driven curser, touch
screen, and to interview administration by telephone. Available in over 60 alternative
language forms, there are several different forms of the WOMAC™ Index suitable for
different clinical practical and clinical research applications. Available in 5-point adjectival,
100 mm visual analogue and 11-point numerical rating scale format.
Validated languages : Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium (French), Belgium
(Flemish), Brazil (Portuguese), Brazil (Japanese), Bulgaria, Canada (English), Canada
(French), Chile, China (Mandarin) Columbia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic,
Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt (Arabic), Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala,
Hong Kong (Cantonese), Hungary, Iceland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lebanon,
Lithuania, Malaysia (Cantonese), Malaysia (English), Malaysia (Malay), Mexico, The
Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Peru (Japanese), Philippines (English),
Philippines (Tagalog), Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore
(Mandarin), Singapore (English), Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa (English), South Africa
(Afrikaans), Spain, Sweden, Switzerland (German), Switzerland (Italian), Switzerland
(French), Taiwan (Mandarin), Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, Ukraine, USA (English),
USA (Spanish), Venezuela.
References :
•   Bellamy N. Osteoarthritis - An evaluative index for clinical trials. MSc Thesis. McMaster
    University, Hamilton, Canada. 1982.
•   Bellamy N and Buchanan WW. Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials:
    the case for standardisation. Clinical Rheumatology. 1984;3(3):293-303.
•   Bellamy N and Buchanan WW. A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and
    clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clinical
    Rheumatology. 1986;5(2):231-241.
•   Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J and Stitt L. Validation study of
    WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant
    outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Journal of
    Orthopaedic Rheumatology. 1988;1:95-108.
•   Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J and Stitt LW. Validation study
    of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient
    relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip
    or knee. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1988;15:1833-1840.
•   Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC
    osteoarthritis index. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1989;18(4 Suppl 2):14-17.
•   Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J and Duku E. Signal
measurement strategies: Are they feasible and do they offer any advantage in outcome
    measurement in osteoarthritis? Arthritis and Rheumatism.1990;33(5): 739-745.
•   Bellamy N, Goldsmith CH, Buchanan WW, Campbell J and Duku E. Prior score
    availability: Observations using the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. British Journal of
    Rheumatology. 1991;30:150-151.
•   Bellamy N, Wells G and Campbell J. Relationship between severity and clinical
    importance of symptoms in osteoarthritis. Clinical Rheumatology. 1991;10(2): 138-143.
•   Bellamy N, Kean WF, Buchanan WW, Gerecz-Simon E and Campbell J. Double blind
    randomized controlled trial of sodium meclofenamate (Meclomen) and diclofenac
    sodium (Voltaren): Post validation reapplication of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index.
    The Journal of Rheumatology. 1992;19:153-159.
•   Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Chalmers A, Ford PM, Kean WF, Kraag GR, Gerecz-Simon
    E and Campbell J. A multicenter study of tenoxicam and diclofenac in patients with
    osteoarthritis of the knee. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1993;20:
•   999-1004.
•   Griffiths G, Bellamy N, Kean WF, Campbell J and Gerecz-Simon E. A study of the time
    frame dependency of responses to the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index.
    Inflammopharmacology. 1993;2:85-87.
•   Barr S, Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Chalmers A, Ford PM, Kean WF, Kraag GR,
    Gerecz-Simon E and Campbell J. A comparative study of signal versus aggregate
    methods of outcome measurement based on the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. The
    Journal of Rheumatology. 1994;21:2106-2112.
•   Griffiths G, Bellamy N, Bailey WH, Bailey SI, McLaren AC and Campbell J. A
    comparative study of the relative efficiency of the WOMAC, AIMS and HAQ
    instruments in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.
    Inflammopharmacology. 1995;3:1-6.
•   Bellamy N, Campbell J, Stevens J, Pilch L, Stewart C and Mahmood Z. Validation study
    of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA 3.0
    Osteoarthritis Index. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1997;24:2413-2415.
•   Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vondechend M, Bellamy N and Theiler R. Validation and patient
    acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index.
    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):80-84.
•   Theiler R, Spielberger J, Bischoff HA, Bellamy N, Huber J, Kroesen S. Clinical
    evaluation of the WOMAC 3.0 OA Index in numeric rating scale format using a
    computerized touch screen version. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2002;10:479-481.
•   Theiler R, Kroesen S, Spielberger J and Bellamy N. Validation of the WOMAC 3.0 TS,
    an audiovisual computerized version of the WOMAC 3.0. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.
    2000;8(2):152-153.
•   Theiler R, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Good M and Bellamy N. Responsiveness of the
    electronic touch screen WOMAC 3.1 OA Index in a short term clinical trial with
    rofecoxib. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2004;12(11):912-916.
•   Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC and Bellamy N.
    Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster
    Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with
    osteoarthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2000;27(11):2635-2641.
•   Bellamy N, Campbell J, Hill J and Band P. A comparative study of telephone versus
    onsite completion of the WOMAC 3.0 Osteoarthritis Index. The Journal of
    Rheumatology. 2002;29(4):783-786.
•   Bellamy N. WOMAC: A 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported
health status questionnaire. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2002;29 (12):2473-2476.
•   Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson
    D, Hochberg M, van der Heijde D and Dougados M. Evaluation of clinically relevant
    changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal
    clinically important improvement. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):29-33.
    [Also see leader by Bijlsma JWJ. Patient centred outcomes in osteoarthritis. Annals of the
    Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):1-2.]
•   Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson
    D, Hochberg M, van der Heijde D and Dougados M. Evaluation of clinically relevant
    states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable
    symptom state. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):34-37. [Also see leader by
    Bijlsma JWJ. Patient centred outcomes in osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic
    Diseases. 2005;64(1):1-2.]
•   Bellamy N, Bell MJ, Goldsmith CH, Pericak D, Walker V, Raynauld JP, Torrance GW,
    Tugwell P and Polisson R. Evaluation of WOMAC 20, 50, 70 response criteria in patients
    treated with hylan G-F 20 for knee osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
    2005;64:881-885 (doi:10.1136/ard.2004.026443).
•   Bellamy N, Bell MJ, Goldsmith CH, Pericak D, Walker V, Raynauld J-P, Torrance GW,
    Tugwell P and Polisson R. The effectiveness of hylan G-F 20 in patients with knee
    osteoarthritis: an application of two sets of response criteria developed by the OARSI and
    one set developed by OMERACT-OARSI. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2005;13(2):104-
    110.
•   Bellamy N, Bell MJ, Pericak D, Goldsmith CH, Torrance GW, Raynauld J-P, Walker P,
    Tugwell P and Polisson R. BLISS index for analyzing knee osteoarthritis trials data.
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60:124-132.

Links :     www.womac.org

WOMAC™ Questionnaire Content

Pain Subscale:

    1.     Walking on flat surface
    2.     Going up/down stairs
    3.     At night
    4.     Sitting/lying
    5.     Standing upright


Physical Function Subscale:

    8.     Descending stairs
    9.     Ascending stairs
    10.    Getting out of chair
    11.    Remaining in standing position
    12.    Bending
    13.    Walking on flat surface
    14.    In/out of car
    15.    Shopping
16.   Socks/stockings on
17.   Getting out of bed
18.   Socks/stockings off
19.   Lying in bed
20.   In/out bath
21.   Sitting
22.   Toileting
23.   Heavy domestic duties
24.   Light domestic duties

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Gait normal & abnormal
Gait normal & abnormalGait normal & abnormal
Gait normal & abnormal
Ratan Khuman
 
Tests for shoulder joint
Tests for shoulder jointTests for shoulder joint
Tests for shoulder joint
Aarti Sareen
 
approach a patient with low back pain
approach a patient with low back painapproach a patient with low back pain
approach a patient with low back pain
alyaqdhan
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Gait normal & abnormal
Gait normal & abnormalGait normal & abnormal
Gait normal & abnormal
 
Low BACK PAIN
Low BACK PAINLow BACK PAIN
Low BACK PAIN
 
Osteoarthritis Diagnosis and Treatment
Osteoarthritis Diagnosis and TreatmentOsteoarthritis Diagnosis and Treatment
Osteoarthritis Diagnosis and Treatment
 
ACL tear
ACL tearACL tear
ACL tear
 
Sacroiliac(SI) Joint Dysfunction,Evaluation and Treatment
Sacroiliac(SI) Joint Dysfunction,Evaluation and Treatment Sacroiliac(SI) Joint Dysfunction,Evaluation and Treatment
Sacroiliac(SI) Joint Dysfunction,Evaluation and Treatment
 
Supraspinatus Tendinitis Case Presentation of Musculoskeletal Module
Supraspinatus Tendinitis Case Presentation of Musculoskeletal ModuleSupraspinatus Tendinitis Case Presentation of Musculoskeletal Module
Supraspinatus Tendinitis Case Presentation of Musculoskeletal Module
 
Tests for shoulder joint
Tests for shoulder jointTests for shoulder joint
Tests for shoulder joint
 
4 knee assessment - History
4 knee assessment - History4 knee assessment - History
4 knee assessment - History
 
approach a patient with low back pain
approach a patient with low back painapproach a patient with low back pain
approach a patient with low back pain
 
Osteoarthritis knee
Osteoarthritis  kneeOsteoarthritis  knee
Osteoarthritis knee
 
Bicep Femoris Tendinitis
Bicep Femoris TendinitisBicep Femoris Tendinitis
Bicep Femoris Tendinitis
 
Rashi crps recent advances slideshare
Rashi crps recent advances slideshareRashi crps recent advances slideshare
Rashi crps recent advances slideshare
 
Case presentation
Case presentationCase presentation
Case presentation
 
Hand deformity in rheumatoid arthritis
Hand deformity in rheumatoid arthritisHand deformity in rheumatoid arthritis
Hand deformity in rheumatoid arthritis
 
ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS physiotherapy ppt
ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS  physiotherapy pptANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS  physiotherapy ppt
ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS physiotherapy ppt
 
Patellar fractures & Physiotherapy
Patellar fractures & PhysiotherapyPatellar fractures & Physiotherapy
Patellar fractures & Physiotherapy
 
Case Presentation
Case Presentation Case Presentation
Case Presentation
 
PCP AC 2021 - Back Pain Basics
PCP AC 2021 - Back Pain BasicsPCP AC 2021 - Back Pain Basics
PCP AC 2021 - Back Pain Basics
 
Biceps Rupture
Biceps Rupture Biceps Rupture
Biceps Rupture
 
Case
CaseCase
Case
 

Ähnlich wie Womac questionnaire information

Surgical Treatment of Haglund Triad by Using Complete Detachment and Reattach...
Surgical Treatment of Haglund Triad by Using Complete Detachment and Reattach...Surgical Treatment of Haglund Triad by Using Complete Detachment and Reattach...
Surgical Treatment of Haglund Triad by Using Complete Detachment and Reattach...
skisnfeet
 
Analytical Study of Clinicopathological Data of Saudi Patients with Osteoarth...
Analytical Study of Clinicopathological Data of Saudi Patients with Osteoarth...Analytical Study of Clinicopathological Data of Saudi Patients with Osteoarth...
Analytical Study of Clinicopathological Data of Saudi Patients with Osteoarth...
Prof. Hesham N. Mustafa
 
Kyphoplasty
KyphoplastyKyphoplasty
Kyphoplasty
yury
 
ABC1 - L. Fallowfield - Differencies in side effects assessment among doctors...
ABC1 - L. Fallowfield - Differencies in side effects assessment among doctors...ABC1 - L. Fallowfield - Differencies in side effects assessment among doctors...
ABC1 - L. Fallowfield - Differencies in side effects assessment among doctors...
European School of Oncology
 

Ähnlich wie Womac questionnaire information (20)

Rotator Cuff Evidence Update
Rotator Cuff Evidence Update  Rotator Cuff Evidence Update
Rotator Cuff Evidence Update
 
An MRI Based Double Blinded Obseravational Study of Posterior Tibial Slope in...
An MRI Based Double Blinded Obseravational Study of Posterior Tibial Slope in...An MRI Based Double Blinded Obseravational Study of Posterior Tibial Slope in...
An MRI Based Double Blinded Obseravational Study of Posterior Tibial Slope in...
 
Surgical Treatment of Haglund Triad by Using Complete Detachment and Reattach...
Surgical Treatment of Haglund Triad by Using Complete Detachment and Reattach...Surgical Treatment of Haglund Triad by Using Complete Detachment and Reattach...
Surgical Treatment of Haglund Triad by Using Complete Detachment and Reattach...
 
Validity of Clinical Attachment Loss for Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Postmen...
Validity of Clinical Attachment Loss for Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Postmen...Validity of Clinical Attachment Loss for Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Postmen...
Validity of Clinical Attachment Loss for Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Postmen...
 
Rotator cuff evidence update
Rotator cuff evidence updateRotator cuff evidence update
Rotator cuff evidence update
 
Analytical Study of Clinicopathological Data of Saudi Patients with Osteoarth...
Analytical Study of Clinicopathological Data of Saudi Patients with Osteoarth...Analytical Study of Clinicopathological Data of Saudi Patients with Osteoarth...
Analytical Study of Clinicopathological Data of Saudi Patients with Osteoarth...
 
Evidence based radial shock wave therapy
Evidence based radial shock wave therapyEvidence based radial shock wave therapy
Evidence based radial shock wave therapy
 
Kyphoplasty
KyphoplastyKyphoplasty
Kyphoplasty
 
Tibial tubercle transposition for patellofemoral malalignment
Tibial tubercle transposition for patellofemoral malalignmentTibial tubercle transposition for patellofemoral malalignment
Tibial tubercle transposition for patellofemoral malalignment
 
Anatomic Plantar Plate Repair
Anatomic Plantar Plate RepairAnatomic Plantar Plate Repair
Anatomic Plantar Plate Repair
 
Hip oa + itbs
Hip oa + itbsHip oa + itbs
Hip oa + itbs
 
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery its relevance - Evidence Based
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery its relevance - Evidence BasedEnhanced Recovery after Surgery its relevance - Evidence Based
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery its relevance - Evidence Based
 
Bastin.ppt
Bastin.pptBastin.ppt
Bastin.ppt
 
BMAC in cuff repairs
BMAC in cuff repairsBMAC in cuff repairs
BMAC in cuff repairs
 
Taddio Isokinetic London 2012: Football Medicine Strategies for Knee Injuries
Taddio Isokinetic London 2012: Football Medicine Strategies for Knee InjuriesTaddio Isokinetic London 2012: Football Medicine Strategies for Knee Injuries
Taddio Isokinetic London 2012: Football Medicine Strategies for Knee Injuries
 
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care
Examination of Common Orthopedic Conditions Encountered in Acute Care
 
Osteoporosis 2016 | Fracture Risk Assessment: Vertebral fractures: Dr Emma Cl...
Osteoporosis 2016 | Fracture Risk Assessment: Vertebral fractures: Dr Emma Cl...Osteoporosis 2016 | Fracture Risk Assessment: Vertebral fractures: Dr Emma Cl...
Osteoporosis 2016 | Fracture Risk Assessment: Vertebral fractures: Dr Emma Cl...
 
The six minute walk test for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
The six minute walk test for patients with lumbar spinal stenosisThe six minute walk test for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
The six minute walk test for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
 
EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF BISPHOSPHONATES IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOPORO...
EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF BISPHOSPHONATES IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOPORO...EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF BISPHOSPHONATES IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOPORO...
EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF BISPHOSPHONATES IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOPORO...
 
ABC1 - L. Fallowfield - Differencies in side effects assessment among doctors...
ABC1 - L. Fallowfield - Differencies in side effects assessment among doctors...ABC1 - L. Fallowfield - Differencies in side effects assessment among doctors...
ABC1 - L. Fallowfield - Differencies in side effects assessment among doctors...
 

Womac questionnaire information

  • 1. WOMACTM Questionnaire Objectives : The WOMAC™ Index is a disease-specific, tri-dimensional self- administered questionnaire, for assessing health status and health outcomes in osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip. Target population : Patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. Method of use : The questionnaire contains 24 questions, targeting areas of pain, stiffness and physical function, and can be completed in less than 5 minutes. Usually patient self-administered, the Index is amenable to electronic data capture (EDC) formats using mouse-driven curser, touch screen, and to interview administration by telephone. Available in over 60 alternative language forms, there are several different forms of the WOMAC™ Index suitable for different clinical practical and clinical research applications. Available in 5-point adjectival, 100 mm visual analogue and 11-point numerical rating scale format. Validated languages : Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium (French), Belgium (Flemish), Brazil (Portuguese), Brazil (Japanese), Bulgaria, Canada (English), Canada (French), Chile, China (Mandarin) Columbia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt (Arabic), Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong (Cantonese), Hungary, Iceland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Malaysia (Cantonese), Malaysia (English), Malaysia (Malay), Mexico, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Peru (Japanese), Philippines (English), Philippines (Tagalog), Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore (Mandarin), Singapore (English), Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa (English), South Africa (Afrikaans), Spain, Sweden, Switzerland (German), Switzerland (Italian), Switzerland (French), Taiwan (Mandarin), Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, Ukraine, USA (English), USA (Spanish), Venezuela. References : • Bellamy N. Osteoarthritis - An evaluative index for clinical trials. MSc Thesis. McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. 1982. • Bellamy N and Buchanan WW. Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials: the case for standardisation. Clinical Rheumatology. 1984;3(3):293-303. • Bellamy N and Buchanan WW. A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clinical Rheumatology. 1986;5(2):231-241. • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J and Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology. 1988;1:95-108. • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J and Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1988;15:1833-1840. • Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1989;18(4 Suppl 2):14-17. • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J and Duku E. Signal
  • 2. measurement strategies: Are they feasible and do they offer any advantage in outcome measurement in osteoarthritis? Arthritis and Rheumatism.1990;33(5): 739-745. • Bellamy N, Goldsmith CH, Buchanan WW, Campbell J and Duku E. Prior score availability: Observations using the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. British Journal of Rheumatology. 1991;30:150-151. • Bellamy N, Wells G and Campbell J. Relationship between severity and clinical importance of symptoms in osteoarthritis. Clinical Rheumatology. 1991;10(2): 138-143. • Bellamy N, Kean WF, Buchanan WW, Gerecz-Simon E and Campbell J. Double blind randomized controlled trial of sodium meclofenamate (Meclomen) and diclofenac sodium (Voltaren): Post validation reapplication of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1992;19:153-159. • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Chalmers A, Ford PM, Kean WF, Kraag GR, Gerecz-Simon E and Campbell J. A multicenter study of tenoxicam and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1993;20: • 999-1004. • Griffiths G, Bellamy N, Kean WF, Campbell J and Gerecz-Simon E. A study of the time frame dependency of responses to the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Inflammopharmacology. 1993;2:85-87. • Barr S, Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Chalmers A, Ford PM, Kean WF, Kraag GR, Gerecz-Simon E and Campbell J. A comparative study of signal versus aggregate methods of outcome measurement based on the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1994;21:2106-2112. • Griffiths G, Bellamy N, Bailey WH, Bailey SI, McLaren AC and Campbell J. A comparative study of the relative efficiency of the WOMAC, AIMS and HAQ instruments in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Inflammopharmacology. 1995;3:1-6. • Bellamy N, Campbell J, Stevens J, Pilch L, Stewart C and Mahmood Z. Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA 3.0 Osteoarthritis Index. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1997;24:2413-2415. • Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vondechend M, Bellamy N and Theiler R. Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):80-84. • Theiler R, Spielberger J, Bischoff HA, Bellamy N, Huber J, Kroesen S. Clinical evaluation of the WOMAC 3.0 OA Index in numeric rating scale format using a computerized touch screen version. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2002;10:479-481. • Theiler R, Kroesen S, Spielberger J and Bellamy N. Validation of the WOMAC 3.0 TS, an audiovisual computerized version of the WOMAC 3.0. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2000;8(2):152-153. • Theiler R, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Good M and Bellamy N. Responsiveness of the electronic touch screen WOMAC 3.1 OA Index in a short term clinical trial with rofecoxib. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2004;12(11):912-916. • Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC and Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2000;27(11):2635-2641. • Bellamy N, Campbell J, Hill J and Band P. A comparative study of telephone versus onsite completion of the WOMAC 3.0 Osteoarthritis Index. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2002;29(4):783-786. • Bellamy N. WOMAC: A 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported
  • 3. health status questionnaire. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2002;29 (12):2473-2476. • Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson D, Hochberg M, van der Heijde D and Dougados M. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):29-33. [Also see leader by Bijlsma JWJ. Patient centred outcomes in osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):1-2.] • Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson D, Hochberg M, van der Heijde D and Dougados M. Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):34-37. [Also see leader by Bijlsma JWJ. Patient centred outcomes in osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(1):1-2.] • Bellamy N, Bell MJ, Goldsmith CH, Pericak D, Walker V, Raynauld JP, Torrance GW, Tugwell P and Polisson R. Evaluation of WOMAC 20, 50, 70 response criteria in patients treated with hylan G-F 20 for knee osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2005;64:881-885 (doi:10.1136/ard.2004.026443). • Bellamy N, Bell MJ, Goldsmith CH, Pericak D, Walker V, Raynauld J-P, Torrance GW, Tugwell P and Polisson R. The effectiveness of hylan G-F 20 in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an application of two sets of response criteria developed by the OARSI and one set developed by OMERACT-OARSI. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2005;13(2):104- 110. • Bellamy N, Bell MJ, Pericak D, Goldsmith CH, Torrance GW, Raynauld J-P, Walker P, Tugwell P and Polisson R. BLISS index for analyzing knee osteoarthritis trials data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60:124-132. Links : www.womac.org WOMAC™ Questionnaire Content Pain Subscale: 1. Walking on flat surface 2. Going up/down stairs 3. At night 4. Sitting/lying 5. Standing upright Physical Function Subscale: 8. Descending stairs 9. Ascending stairs 10. Getting out of chair 11. Remaining in standing position 12. Bending 13. Walking on flat surface 14. In/out of car 15. Shopping
  • 4. 16. Socks/stockings on 17. Getting out of bed 18. Socks/stockings off 19. Lying in bed 20. In/out bath 21. Sitting 22. Toileting 23. Heavy domestic duties 24. Light domestic duties