SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Huddersfield ,[object Object]
Huddersfield borrowing suggestions
Huddersfield personalised suggestions
Huddersfield course level new book feed
Huddersfield journal suggestions
Huddersfield ,[object Object]
Measuring the impact range of stock circulating number of unique titles (bib#) borrowed per calendar year (2009 figure is predicted) borrowing suggestions added to catalogue at end of 2005
Measuring the impact  number of books borrowed average number of books borrowed per active borrower per calendar year (2009 predicted)
Usage data release December 2008

More Related Content

More from daveyp

Uksg2012 dave pattern_final
Uksg2012 dave pattern_finalUksg2012 dave pattern_final
Uksg2012 dave pattern_final
daveyp
 
Library 2.0 and the JISC MOSAIC Project
Library 2.0 and the JISC MOSAIC ProjectLibrary 2.0 and the JISC MOSAIC Project
Library 2.0 and the JISC MOSAIC Project
daveyp
 
Did someone say "Free Beer"?
Did someone say "Free Beer"?Did someone say "Free Beer"?
Did someone say "Free Beer"?
daveyp
 
Sheffield
SheffieldSheffield
Sheffield
daveyp
 
Cardiff - Web 2.0 & Library 2.0
Cardiff - Web 2.0 & Library 2.0Cardiff - Web 2.0 & Library 2.0
Cardiff - Web 2.0 & Library 2.0
daveyp
 

More from daveyp (20)

Library Impact Data Project
Library Impact Data ProjectLibrary Impact Data Project
Library Impact Data Project
 
(H)appiness is a warm API!
(H)appiness is a warm API!(H)appiness is a warm API!
(H)appiness is a warm API!
 
Summon: The Path of Least Resistance
Summon: The Path of Least ResistanceSummon: The Path of Least Resistance
Summon: The Path of Least Resistance
 
Uksg2012 dave pattern_final
Uksg2012 dave pattern_finalUksg2012 dave pattern_final
Uksg2012 dave pattern_final
 
Summon Launch
Summon LaunchSummon Launch
Summon Launch
 
Mosaic Wolverhampton
Mosaic WolverhamptonMosaic Wolverhampton
Mosaic Wolverhampton
 
Web 2.0 at Huddersfield
Web 2.0 at HuddersfieldWeb 2.0 at Huddersfield
Web 2.0 at Huddersfield
 
Library 2.0 and the JISC MOSAIC Project
Library 2.0 and the JISC MOSAIC ProjectLibrary 2.0 and the JISC MOSAIC Project
Library 2.0 and the JISC MOSAIC Project
 
ILI2009: Exploiting Usage Data
ILI2009: Exploiting Usage DataILI2009: Exploiting Usage Data
ILI2009: Exploiting Usage Data
 
Cosi Usage Data
Cosi   Usage DataCosi   Usage Data
Cosi Usage Data
 
Cosi V Mware
Cosi   V MwareCosi   V Mware
Cosi V Mware
 
Cosi Opac Tweaks
Cosi   Opac TweaksCosi   Opac Tweaks
Cosi Opac Tweaks
 
Did someone say "Free Beer"?
Did someone say "Free Beer"?Did someone say "Free Beer"?
Did someone say "Free Beer"?
 
Web 2.0 and You Too
Web 2.0 and You TooWeb 2.0 and You Too
Web 2.0 and You Too
 
Sheffield
SheffieldSheffield
Sheffield
 
OPAC 2.0 and Beyond
OPAC 2.0 and BeyondOPAC 2.0 and Beyond
OPAC 2.0 and Beyond
 
Can You Dig It
Can You Dig ItCan You Dig It
Can You Dig It
 
Edinburgh Dave Pattern
Edinburgh Dave PatternEdinburgh Dave Pattern
Edinburgh Dave Pattern
 
Cardiff - Web 2.0 & Library 2.0
Cardiff - Web 2.0 & Library 2.0Cardiff - Web 2.0 & Library 2.0
Cardiff - Web 2.0 & Library 2.0
 
ARCLib - Web 2.0 and Library 2.0
ARCLib - Web 2.0 and Library 2.0ARCLib - Web 2.0 and Library 2.0
ARCLib - Web 2.0 and Library 2.0
 

Jisc10

Editor's Notes

  1. 1) Using the historical circulation data, stored by the Library Management System, we were able to generate Amazon style “people who borrowed this, also borrowed” recommendations 2) As most borrowing is driven by reading lists, the suggestions tend to be relevant and on-topic
  2. 1) Once a user has logged into the library catalogue, we’re able to generate personalised suggestions based on their recent borrowing history
  3. 1) By analysing what students on individual courses borrow, and cross-referencing it with the Dewey classifications of those items, we’re able to create a “new book” list that (hopefully) only contains new items that are on interest to the students on that course
  4. 1) In a similar way to the book suggestions, we’re able to use data collected from our Link Resolver to generate journal title suggestions 2) This is a really useful way to letting students know that the library subscribes to a wide range of electronic journals and hopefully they’ll explore the collection
  5. 1) Many of the features we’ve added to the library catalogue have been in place since late 2005, so we’ve been able to monitor the impact those features have had on the long-term borrowing trend
  6. 1) Since introducing borrowing suggestions to the library catalogue, we’ve seen a dramatic year-on-year increase in the range of library stock circulating each year 2) In 2005, approximately one-quarter of the library stock was being borrowed each year – this had now increased to over one-third of the stock in 2009
  7. 1) We’ve also seen a similar trend in the average number of library books borrowed by students each year – increasing from around 14 books prior to 2005, to 16 books in 2009
  8. 1) In December 2008, Huddersfield released aggregated and anonymised usage data for around 2 million borrowing transactions, along with recommendation data for 37,000 book titles 2) To try and promote use, the data was released under an Open Data Commons Licence, which places the data into the Public Domain