SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 28
EC2204- Business Economics
5: Industry Structure and Competition Analysis
Learning Outcomes

Upon completing this section, the student should be able to:

 Distinguish between the various market structures.
 Calculate concentration ratios.
 Interpret Herfindahl index values.
 Describe and illustrate Porters Five Forces.
 Distinguish between long and short-run conditions in perfect
  competition.
 Calculate equilibrium conditions and profit maximizing levels of
  output.
 Distinguish between long and short-run conditions in
  monopolistic competition.
Market Structures
    The convention is to divide industries into categories according to the degree of
     competition that exists between the firms within the industry. There are 4 such
     categories:

1.   At one extreme is perfect competition, where there are very many firms
     competing. Each firm is so small relative to the whole industry that it has no
     power to influence price. It is a price taker.

2.   At the other extreme is monopoly, where there is just one firm in the industry,
     and hence no competition from within the industry.

3.   In the middle comes monopolistic competition, where there are quite a lot of
     firms competing and where there is freedom for new firms to enter and exit the
     industry, and

4.   Oligopoly, where there are only a few firms and where entry of new firms is
     restricted.
Categories of Market Structure

To distinguish more precisely between the four categories, the following must be
    considered:

   How freely can firms enter the industry: is entry free or restricted? If it is
    restricted, just how great are the barriers to the entry of new firms?
 The nature of the product. Do all firms produce an identical product, or do
    firms produce their own particular brand or model or variety?
 The degree of control the firm has over price. Is the firm a price taker or can it
    choose its price, and if it can, how will changing its price affect its profits?
 What we are talking about here is the nature of the demand curve it faces.
    How elastic is it? If it puts up its price, will it lose
(a) all its sales (a horizontal demand curve), or
(b) a large proportion of its sales (a relatively elastic demand curve), or
(c) just a small proportion of its sales (a relatively inelastic demand curve)?
How do we distinguish the market structure?

•In Economics, the concentration ratio of an industry is used as an indicator of the
relative size of firms in relation to the industry as a whole.
•This may also assist in determining the market form of the industry.


•One commonly used concentration ratio is the four-firm concentration ratio, which
consists of the market share, as a percentage, of the four largest firms in the
industry.


•In general, the N-firm concentration ratio is the percentage of market output
generated by the N largest firms in the industry.


•The concentration ratio has a fair amount of correlation to the Herfindahl Index,
another indicator of firm size.
Concentration Ratios
Microprocessor (Pentium Chips)                           Major US Airlines

Company                                 % Market Share   Company                           % Market Share


Intel                                        86%         Amercan                                  20.6%

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)                  9          United                                    20.4


Others                                        5          Delta                                     15.8

                                                         North-west                                14.0


                        US Beer Sales                    Continental                               10.5

Anheuser-Busch (Bud)                        44.9%        US-Airways                                 9.5

Miller                                       22.5        TWA                                        9.3

Coors                                        9.9                             US Gasoline Market

Strobs                                       8.3         Shell                                     8.9%

Heilman                                      6.4         Chevron                                    8.3

Pabst                                        3.3         Texaco                                     7.8

Genessee                                     1.1         Exxon                                      7.8

Others                                       3.7         Amoco                                      7.5

                                                         Mobil                                      7.5
Concentration Ratios
Company                              % Market Share   Company                       % Market Share


                Read-to-Eat Cereal                    BP America                         5.9
Kellog                                    35%         Citgo                              5.4
General Mills                              25         Marathon                           5.2
Post                                       12         Sun                                4.2
Ralston                                    7          Phillips                           3.5
Quaker                                     6          Unocol                             3.5
Nabisco                                    4          Arco                               3.1
Private Label                              10         Conoco                             2.6
Others                                     1          Others                             19.5
                                                                   Music (albums)


                   Soft Drinks                        Sony                               23%
Coca-Cola                                 42%         Warner                              16
Pepsi                                      31         BMG                                 14
Dr Pepper                                  8          EMI                                 13
Seven-Up                                   4          Universal                           11
Schweppes                                  3          Polygram                            10
Others                                     12         Others                              13
Calculating Concentration Ratios
         You are asked to determine whether the                                                Computer Industry
            computer industry or the mobile phone              Firm Dell         HP      Toshiba Freecom PNY Sony Apple IBM
            industry is more competitive using a 4-            Sales 337         384     696      321       769    358   521   880
            firm concentration ratio.                                                        Mobile Phone Industry
                                                               Firm Vodafone        02   Samsung Nokia Motorola Meteor Erikson Eircom
                                                               Sales 556           899     565       782       463   477   846   911
         Step 1: Order the firms in order of sales.
                                                     C omputer Industr y
             IBM        PNY         Toshiba       A pple     HP         Sony                        Dell     Freecom
              880        769          696          521       384         358                        337        321
                                                    Mobile Phone Industr y
            Eircom        02        Erik son      N ok ia  Samsung   Vodafone                   Meteor      Motorola
              911        899          846          782       565         556                     477          463

         Step 2: calculate the total sales for both industries
                                                     Computer Industry
 IBM           PNY        Toshiba         Apple          HP                Sony              Dell          Freecom


 880           769          696            521           384               358                337             321           4,266
                                                   Mobile Phone Industry
Eircom          02        Erikson         Nokia       Samsung          Vodafone             Meteor         Motorola


 911           899          846            782           565               556                477             463           5,499
Calculating Concentration Ratios
      You are asked to determine whether the computer industry or the mobile phone
        industry is more competitive using a 4-firm concentration ratio.
      Step 3: calculate the total sales for the top 4 firms in each industry.
          IBM             PNY              Toshiba           Apple        Computer
           880             769               696              521                    2,866
         Eircom            02              Erikson           Nokia        Mobile Phone

           911             899               846              782                    3,438

     Step 4: calculate 4-firm concentration ratio for both firms
       Computer
                                  2,866/4,266 = 67.2% (4-firm c- ratio)
       Mobile Phone
                                  3,438/5,499 = 62.5% (4-firm c- ratio)
Interpretation
The computer industry (67%) is more concentrated than the mobile phone industry (63%). As there
is an inverse relationship between concentration and competition, the mobile phone industry is more
competitive in this case. However, you should interpret the results with caution and your evidence
should be supported by case studies and further research.
Herfindahl Index
       It is a measure of the size of firms in relationship to the industry and an indicator
          of the amount of competition among them.
         Named after economists Orris C. Herfindahl and Albert O. Hirschman, it is an
          economic concept but widely applied in competition law and antitrust.
         It is defined as the sum of the squares of the market shares of each individual
          firm: ie the average market share, weighted by market share.
         As such, it can range from 0 to 10,000 moving from a very large amount of very
          small firms to a single monopolistic producer.
         Decreases in the Herfindahl index generally indicate a loss of market power and
          an increase in competition, whereas increases imply the opposite.




 where si is the market share of firm i in the market, and n is the number of firms. Thus, in a market
with two firms that each have 50 percent market share, the Herfindahl index equals 0.502 + 0.502 =
Herfindahl Index
 A small index indicates a competitive industry with no dominant players. I
 f all firms have an equal share the reciprocal of the index shows the number of
  firms in the industry.
 When firms have unequal shares, the reciprocal of the index indicates the
  "equivalent" number of firms in the industry.

 H index below 0.1 (or 1,000) indicates an un-concentrated index.

 H index between 0.1 to 0.18 (or 1,000 to 1,800) indicates moderate
   concentration.

 H index above 0.18 (above 1,800) indicates high concentration.
Market Structures

                   Monopolistic Competition                   Oligopoly                       Duopoly
         Many buyers/sellers                  A few firms                           Pepsi/Coca-Cola
         Differentiated product               Air travel, Lager Industry
         Free entry and exit                  Interdependence between firms
                                              Barriers to Entry




                                                                              Monopoly
Perfect Competition
                                                                              Firm = Industry
Market stalls
                                                                              Intel, ESB
Many firms
                                                                              Downward sloping demand curve
Homogeneous Product
                                                                              Barriers to Entry
Price taker
                                                                              Supernormal profits earned in long-run
Perfectly Elastic Curve
Free entry and exit
Porter’s Five Forces

 If the goal in business is to maximise shareholder wealth, the managers will
    seek a pricing and output strategy that maximises the present value of the
    future profits of the firm.
   The determination of wealth-maximising strategy depends on the
    production capacity, cost levels, demand characteristics, and the potential
    for immediate and longer term competition.
   Michael Porter of Harvard Business School in 1979 developed a conceptual
    framework for identifying the threats from competition in a relevant market.
   Incumbent firms attempt to secure competitive advantage through their
    choice of management strategy.
   Porter’s Five Force framework conceptualises the forces that
    determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of a
    market.
   Attractiveness in this context refers to the overall industry profitability.
   An "unattractive" industry is one where the combination of forces acts to
    drive down overall profitability.
   A very unattractive industry would be one approaching "pure competition".
Porter’s Five Forces
       The threat of substitute products: The existence of close substitute products increases the
The threat of the entry of new competitors: Profitable markets that yield high returns will draw
       propensity of customers to switch to alternatives in response to price increases (high
firms. The results is many new entrants, which will effectively decrease profitability. Unless the entry
The elasticity of demand). Threat of substitutes/ most industries, this is the major determinant of the
       intensity of competitive complements For
                                         rivalry:
of new firms can be blocked by incumbents, the profit rate will fall towards a competitive level
       •buyer propensity to substitute
competitiveness of the industry. Sometimes rivals compete aggressively new entrants
                                                                            Threat of and sometimes rivals
(perfect competition).
       •relative price performance of substitutes                              Barriers to entry
compete in non-price dimensions such as innovation, marketing, etc.
•existence of barriers to entry (patents, rights, etc.)
       •buyer switching costs
•number of competitors
•economies of product differences
The bargaining power of suppliers: Suppliers of raw materials, components, and services (such as
       •perceived growth
•rate of industry level of product differentiation
•brand equitythe firm can be a source of power over the firm. Suppliers may refuse to work with the
expertise) to
•intermittent industry overcapacity
•switching costs or excessively high prices for unique resources.
firm, or e.g. charge sunk costs
•exit barriers      Level of competition
•capital requirements industry
supplier switching costs relative to firm switching costs
                        in
•diversity of competitorsrivalry                               Sustain
•access to distribution of customers: The ability of customers to put the firm under pressure and
  degree of differentiation of inputs
                     Intensity of
The bargaining power and asymmetry                            Industry
•informational complexity                                    Profitability
•absolute costthe customer's sensitivity to price changes.
  presence of substitute inputs
                 advantages
itfixed cost allocation per value added
• also affects
•learning curve advantages firm concentration ratio
•supplieradvertising expense concentration ratio
            concentration to
•buyerof
  level concentration to firm by suppliers relative to threat of backward integration by firms
•expected forward integration in industries with high fixed costs
•threat of retaliation by incumbents
•bargaining leverage, particularly
•Economies of relative to selling price of the product
  cost of inputs scale
  government policies
•buyer volume
•Sustainable competitive advantage through improvisation
•buyer switching costs relative to firm switching costs                       Bargaining power of
                                                                                      buyers
•buyer information availability                                                        Buyer
                                                                                   concentration
•ability to backward integrate Bargaining power of suppliers
                                         Number of Suppliers
•availability of existing substitute products
•buyer price sensitivity
•differential advantage (uniqueness) of industry products
Perfect Competition
 The main characteristics of Perfect Competition are:

 1. There are a very large number of sellers competing with each other. Each
  seller contributes only a very small fraction of total supply. Therefore an individual
  seller cannot significantly affect market price by altering his output.
 2. There are a very large number of buyers. The number of buyers is so large
  that no individual buyer can significantly influence the market price by altering his
  volume of purchases.
 3. The product is homogeneous i.e. there is no difference between the product
  of one firm in the industry and the product of any other firm in that industry.
  Therefore to consumers, the products of the different producers are identical.
 4. There is freedom of entry to, and exit from the industry i.e. there are no
  restrictions preventing firms moving easily into, or out of a particular industry.
Perfect Competition
   The main characteristics of Perfect Competition are:

5. Perfect Knowledge - producers and sellers are fully aware of the rate of profit being made
    by the other producers in the industry. All the buyers are assumed to have widespread
    knowledge of the price being asked for the product in every section of the market.
6. Each producer has a perfectly elastic supply of the factors of production i.e. the producer
    can employ more factors to increase his output without forcing up the level of factor
    payments (rents, wages, interest) which currently prevail throughout the industry. This is a
    reasonable assumption (following assumption 1) because each producer or seller forms a
    very small element of total output or supply.
7. Each firm aims to maximise its profits. Profit maximization implies that each firm
    produces an output where Price = Marginal Cost (P = MC). To produce more than this
    quantity implies that P < MC, which is not the most profitable decision. To produce less
    than where P = MC, implies that P > MC, and the firm could increase profits by expanding
    output. In the short-run, a competitive firm may earn economic profits. In the long-run,
    entry pushes price down to the minimum point of the average cost curve, so that economic
    profits are zero.
8. Competitive firms cannot charge more than the market price of others, since their product is
    identical to all others. Hence, competitive firms are price takers.
Perfect Competition                                 (industry versus firm)



                Firm                                        Industry

                                      MC                                 S




     P = D = MR = AR

 P                                              P

                                       D




                                  MR = MC


                                                                         D


                                            Q                                Q
                       q (firm)                           Q (industry)
Perfect Competition                               (Short-Run)




            Firm                               ATC > AR, MR

                                MC             ATC




Costs
                                     AVC
        P
                                                                    D

                                           P = D = MR = AR



                                                             Shut down Rule
                   MR = MC                           If P < AVC the firm shuts down




                                                                          Q
                     q (firm)
Perfect Competition                                   (Short-Run)




              Firm                                  ATC < P, AR, MR

                                  MC
                                                  Firm making super-normal profits
                                                        (Shaded grey area)




                                          ATC
        P
                                                                         D
Costs
                                                P = D = MR = AR




                                MR = MC




                                                                               Q
                     q (firm)
Perfect Competition                                               (Long-Run)

The existence of supernormal profits (shaded grey area in previous slide) is a short-run
condition. Because of the assumption of perfect information potential entrants to the market
are attracted by the super-normal profits as there are no barriers to entry. The industry
supply curve expands to S1 and the market price falls to P1. When the market price falls, the
horizontal demand curve facing each existing firm, as well as each new entrant, also falls.
Each firm adjusts its output to it new profit maximising position where MR = MC. So in the
long-run MR = MC = AR = ATC in perfect competition.

                             Firm                                Industry
                                                                                S
                                                   MC
                                                                                    S1
                    MR = MC = AR = ATC                  ATC


                                                             P
                                                     D
              P                                             P1




                                                MR = MC
                                                                                    D

                                                        Q                               Q
                                    q1 (firm)                    Q (industry)
Supply in Perfect Competition



                    Short-Run                                              Long-Run
    The Supply Curve is that portion of MC Curve           The Supply Curve is that portion of MC Curve
                  above the AVC                                          above the ATC


                                          MC                                                  MC

                                               ATC          ATC

                                                     AVC
                                               AVC
P

                                               D                                                   D




                                     MR = MC
                                                                                               D


                                               Q                                                       Q
                          q (firm)                                        q (firm)
Monopolistic Competition
The main characteristics are:
• many buyers and sellers.

• differentiated product.

• free entry and exit.

• no collusion among the firms.

• Each firm will view its demand curve as declining in its own price.

• A monopolistically competitive firm will have to have a pricing strategy,
  unlike a purely competitive firm.
• Differentiation occurs when consumers perceive that a product differs
  from its competition on any physical or non-physical characteristic,
  including price. Examples: restaurants, dealer-owned gas stations, Video
  rental stores, book & convenience stores, etc.
Monopolistic Competition (short-run)
In the Short-Run firms produce where MR = MC, price (P) on the demand curve, P > MC,
economic profits exist (shaded) as P > AC, there exists incentives for entry into this
industry. Entry in this industry steals customers, demand shifts inwards.
                                      Super-normal profits
                                       earned in short-run
                 Price                                                  MR = MC
                                            (Shaded)
       (monopolistic competition)                                      But AR > AC


                                                             MC
                                                                  AC

                              P




        Average Costs (AC) not
              minimised


                                                   MR = MC




                                                                            D = AR


                                     q                  MR
Monopolistic Competition (long-run)
The profit maximising level of output is where MR = MC, like monopoly. P= AC,
like perfect competition. Super-normal profits are zero as in perfect competition.
However, at the profit maximising level of output average costs are not minimised,
output is not at the least cost point on the average cost curve as in perfect
competition.

                 Price                                             MR = MC
             (monopolistic                                         AR = AC
              competition)                                          P = AC
                                            MC
                                                      AC

                             P



                                                    No super-normal profits earned
                                                      in long-run, because of the
                                                     assumption of no barriers to
           Average Costs (AC)
                                                                 entry
             not minimised


                                        MR = MC



                                                                      D = AR

                                  q       MR
Sample Questions
Q1: For the industry: QS = 3000 + 200P and QD = 13500 - 500P. For the perfectly competitive firm:
 FC = 50, MC = 15 - 4Q + 3Q2/10 and AVC = 15 - 2Q + Q2/10. Calculate (a) The optimal output
for this firm? (b) The total revenue of the firm at the profit maximising level of output. (c) The total
costs of the firm. (d) The profit of the firm,
Solution: Find equilibrium price. Set QS = QD
                                 3000 + 200P = 13500 - 500P.
                                   10500 / 700 = P so P = 15.
At this price, the firm produces where P = MC, (perfect competition)
                              so 15 = 15 - 4Q + 3Q2/10
                                4Q = 0.3Q2 so 4 = 0.3Q
                          (a) so Q = 4/0.3 = 13.33 (Optimal output)
                              Profit = TR - TC at this output. Profit = TR[P*Q] - [FC + VC]
                            (b) TR = 15*13.33 = 199.95

                               TC = 50 + VC
                             AVC = 15 - 2Q + Q2/10
                               VC = AVC*Q = 15 - 2Q + Q2/10 * Q = 15Q – 2Q2 + Q3/10
                               VC = 15(13.33) – 2(13.33)2 + (13.33)3/10 = 81.43
                            (c) TC = 50 + 81.43 = 131.43 (i.e. FC + VC)

                      (d) Profit = [TR – TC] = [199.95 – 131.43] = 68.52
Sample Questions
Q2: Determine the optimal output, Q, for the following firm where TR = 14Q, and TC =
48+Q+0.5Q2. Does the data show whether the firm is perfectly competitive, monopolistically
competitive, oligopoly or monopoly?

                                    Solution: TR = 14Q,
                                               TC = 48+Q+0.5Q2.
                                                π = TR -TC
                                                 π = 14Q – [48+Q+0.5Q2]
                                                π = -48 + 13Q -0.5Q2
                                               ∆π
                                                  = 13 − Q = 0
                                               ∆Q
                                               ∆π
                                                  =0
                                               ∆Q
so Q = 13 (optimal level of output where where π is maximised)

The firm is perfectly competitive because Price is a constant €14
                                      As TR = P * Q,

                                          TR =14Q
MCQ Questions
3.`Which is NOT a characteristic of an industry that displays perfect competition?
a. free entry
b. heterogeneous product
c. many sellers
d. free exit.


4. For a competitive firm, if MC is below price:
a. raise output to raise profit,
b. reduce output to raise profit,
c. raise price to raise profit,
d. reduce price to raise profit.


5. In a competitive industry, if costs of production rise, we anticipate that:
a. price will rise and quantity will stay about the same,
b. price will rise and quantity will rise.
c. price will rise and quantity will fall,
d. price will decline to make up for the fact that costs
Recall Our Learning Outcomes

You should now be able to:

 Distinguish between the various market structures.
 Calculate concentration ratios.
 Interpret Herfindahl index values.
 Describe and illustrate Porters Five Forces.
 Distinguish between long and short-run conditions in perfect
  competition.
 Calculate equilibrium conditions and profit maximizing levels of
  output.
 Distinguish between long and short-run conditions in
  monopolistic competition.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

GLOBALIZATION CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES BBA 5TH UOG
GLOBALIZATION CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES BBA 5TH UOGGLOBALIZATION CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES BBA 5TH UOG
GLOBALIZATION CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES BBA 5TH UOGRashid Gorsi
 
International Marketing The International Legal Environment
International Marketing The International Legal EnvironmentInternational Marketing The International Legal Environment
International Marketing The International Legal EnvironmentDr. John V. Padua
 
Global trading environment ppt
Global trading environment pptGlobal trading environment ppt
Global trading environment pptMonisha Devi
 
GBS CH 1 FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL STRATEGY
GBS CH 1 FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL STRATEGYGBS CH 1 FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL STRATEGY
GBS CH 1 FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL STRATEGYShadina Shah
 
Chapter 8 strategic evaluation and control
Chapter 8 strategic evaluation and controlChapter 8 strategic evaluation and control
Chapter 8 strategic evaluation and controlRoshan Pant
 
Government intervention in Markets
Government intervention in MarketsGovernment intervention in Markets
Government intervention in Marketstutor2u
 
Pestle analysis
Pestle analysisPestle analysis
Pestle analysisSelman Ay
 
Monopolistic And Oligopoly
Monopolistic And OligopolyMonopolistic And Oligopoly
Monopolistic And Oligopolymandalina landy
 
International Marketing Management - Introduction
International Marketing Management - IntroductionInternational Marketing Management - Introduction
International Marketing Management - IntroductionSOMASUNDARAM T
 
Multi business strategy
Multi business strategyMulti business strategy
Multi business strategyEka Darmadi
 
Merger and acquisition-The basic concept
Merger and acquisition-The basic conceptMerger and acquisition-The basic concept
Merger and acquisition-The basic conceptMaitrayee Pathak
 
The Marketing Environment
The Marketing EnvironmentThe Marketing Environment
The Marketing EnvironmentMehmet Cihangir
 
International Marketing: An Introduction
International Marketing: An IntroductionInternational Marketing: An Introduction
International Marketing: An Introductionarciagarj
 
Mergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitionsMergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitionsAnurag Savarnya
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

GLOBALIZATION CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES BBA 5TH UOG
GLOBALIZATION CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES BBA 5TH UOGGLOBALIZATION CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES BBA 5TH UOG
GLOBALIZATION CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSSINES BBA 5TH UOG
 
Ibm unit - i
Ibm   unit - iIbm   unit - i
Ibm unit - i
 
International Marketing The International Legal Environment
International Marketing The International Legal EnvironmentInternational Marketing The International Legal Environment
International Marketing The International Legal Environment
 
Global trading environment ppt
Global trading environment pptGlobal trading environment ppt
Global trading environment ppt
 
GBS CH 1 FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL STRATEGY
GBS CH 1 FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL STRATEGYGBS CH 1 FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL STRATEGY
GBS CH 1 FOUNDATIONS OF GLOBAL STRATEGY
 
Ge9 final ppt
Ge9 final pptGe9 final ppt
Ge9 final ppt
 
MBA 8480 - Industry Analysis
MBA 8480 - Industry AnalysisMBA 8480 - Industry Analysis
MBA 8480 - Industry Analysis
 
Chapter 8 strategic evaluation and control
Chapter 8 strategic evaluation and controlChapter 8 strategic evaluation and control
Chapter 8 strategic evaluation and control
 
Government intervention in Markets
Government intervention in MarketsGovernment intervention in Markets
Government intervention in Markets
 
Pestle analysis
Pestle analysisPestle analysis
Pestle analysis
 
Monopolistic And Oligopoly
Monopolistic And OligopolyMonopolistic And Oligopoly
Monopolistic And Oligopoly
 
International Marketing Management - Introduction
International Marketing Management - IntroductionInternational Marketing Management - Introduction
International Marketing Management - Introduction
 
Strategic management model process
Strategic management model processStrategic management model process
Strategic management model process
 
Multi business strategy
Multi business strategyMulti business strategy
Multi business strategy
 
Merger and acquisition-The basic concept
Merger and acquisition-The basic conceptMerger and acquisition-The basic concept
Merger and acquisition-The basic concept
 
The Marketing Environment
The Marketing EnvironmentThe Marketing Environment
The Marketing Environment
 
International Marketing: An Introduction
International Marketing: An IntroductionInternational Marketing: An Introduction
International Marketing: An Introduction
 
Global Marketing
Global  Marketing Global  Marketing
Global Marketing
 
Mergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitionsMergers and acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitions
 
Forecasting and demand measurement
Forecasting and demand measurementForecasting and demand measurement
Forecasting and demand measurement
 

Andere mochten auch

Competitive structure of industries
Competitive structure of industriesCompetitive structure of industries
Competitive structure of industriesawantika diwan
 
Structure of industries PPT MBA INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT
Structure of industries PPT MBA INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT Structure of industries PPT MBA INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT
Structure of industries PPT MBA INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT Babasab Patil
 
VRIO Honda and general motors
VRIO Honda and general motorsVRIO Honda and general motors
VRIO Honda and general motorsParameswar Rao
 
9. life cycle strategies
9. life cycle strategies9. life cycle strategies
9. life cycle strategiesJigar Lakhani
 
Defensive Strategies in Strategic Management - Karim Virani
Defensive Strategies in Strategic Management - Karim ViraniDefensive Strategies in Strategic Management - Karim Virani
Defensive Strategies in Strategic Management - Karim ViraniKarim Virani
 
Offensive attack strategy
Offensive attack strategyOffensive attack strategy
Offensive attack strategyAvinash Avi
 
Establishing the strategic control ppt (Stratergic Management)
Establishing the strategic control ppt (Stratergic Management)Establishing the strategic control ppt (Stratergic Management)
Establishing the strategic control ppt (Stratergic Management)Babasab Patil
 
Offensive & deffense strategies
Offensive & deffense strategiesOffensive & deffense strategies
Offensive & deffense strategiesendangered26k
 
Market Structure and Types of Market Structure
Market Structure and Types of Market StructureMarket Structure and Types of Market Structure
Market Structure and Types of Market StructureMithilesh Trivedi
 
Marketing warfare
Marketing warfareMarketing warfare
Marketing warfareSantosh JK
 
Chapter 7 strategic management
Chapter 7 strategic management Chapter 7 strategic management
Chapter 7 strategic management Kalsoom Fatima
 
Defensive and offensive strategies
Defensive and offensive strategiesDefensive and offensive strategies
Defensive and offensive strategiesNouman Rafique
 
Offensive & defensive strategies
Offensive & defensive strategiesOffensive & defensive strategies
Offensive & defensive strategiesNagarjuna Adiga
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Functional strategies
Functional strategiesFunctional strategies
Functional strategies
 
Marketing Warfare
Marketing WarfareMarketing Warfare
Marketing Warfare
 
Competitive structure of industries
Competitive structure of industriesCompetitive structure of industries
Competitive structure of industries
 
Structure of industries PPT MBA INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT
Structure of industries PPT MBA INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT Structure of industries PPT MBA INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT
Structure of industries PPT MBA INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT
 
VRIO Honda and general motors
VRIO Honda and general motorsVRIO Honda and general motors
VRIO Honda and general motors
 
9. life cycle strategies
9. life cycle strategies9. life cycle strategies
9. life cycle strategies
 
strategic
strategicstrategic
strategic
 
Defensive Strategies in Strategic Management - Karim Virani
Defensive Strategies in Strategic Management - Karim ViraniDefensive Strategies in Strategic Management - Karim Virani
Defensive Strategies in Strategic Management - Karim Virani
 
Offensive attack strategy
Offensive attack strategyOffensive attack strategy
Offensive attack strategy
 
Chapter 3 grand strategy
Chapter 3 grand strategyChapter 3 grand strategy
Chapter 3 grand strategy
 
Establishing the strategic control ppt (Stratergic Management)
Establishing the strategic control ppt (Stratergic Management)Establishing the strategic control ppt (Stratergic Management)
Establishing the strategic control ppt (Stratergic Management)
 
Offensive & deffense strategies
Offensive & deffense strategiesOffensive & deffense strategies
Offensive & deffense strategies
 
Market Structure and Types of Market Structure
Market Structure and Types of Market StructureMarket Structure and Types of Market Structure
Market Structure and Types of Market Structure
 
Marketing warfare
Marketing warfareMarketing warfare
Marketing warfare
 
BCG vs GE Matrix
BCG vs GE MatrixBCG vs GE Matrix
BCG vs GE Matrix
 
Chapter 7 strategic management
Chapter 7 strategic management Chapter 7 strategic management
Chapter 7 strategic management
 
Blue Ocean Strategy
Blue Ocean Strategy  Blue Ocean Strategy
Blue Ocean Strategy
 
Defensive and offensive strategies
Defensive and offensive strategiesDefensive and offensive strategies
Defensive and offensive strategies
 
Different levels of strategy
Different levels of strategyDifferent levels of strategy
Different levels of strategy
 
Offensive & defensive strategies
Offensive & defensive strategiesOffensive & defensive strategies
Offensive & defensive strategies
 

Ähnlich wie 5 industry structure and competition analysis

Slide presentation 1 q09
Slide presentation 1 q09Slide presentation 1 q09
Slide presentation 1 q09Cia Hering RI
 
Slide presentation 4 q07
Slide presentation 4 q07Slide presentation 4 q07
Slide presentation 4 q07Cia Hering RI
 
Slide presentation 2 q08
Slide presentation 2 q08Slide presentation 2 q08
Slide presentation 2 q08Cia Hering RI
 
Prediction case on competitor orientation
Prediction case on competitor orientation Prediction case on competitor orientation
Prediction case on competitor orientation Scott Armstrong
 
Slide presentation 3 q09
Slide presentation 3 q09Slide presentation 3 q09
Slide presentation 3 q09Cia Hering RI
 
LEAR 2005 sholders meet
 LEAR  2005 sholders meet LEAR  2005 sholders meet
LEAR 2005 sholders meetfinance16
 
Slide presentation 3 q07
Slide presentation 3 q07Slide presentation 3 q07
Slide presentation 3 q07Cia Hering RI
 
Financial analysis total sa - total sa explores for, produces, refines, tra...
Financial analysis   total sa - total sa explores for, produces, refines, tra...Financial analysis   total sa - total sa explores for, produces, refines, tra...
Financial analysis total sa - total sa explores for, produces, refines, tra...BCV
 
Slide presentation 4 q08
Slide presentation 4 q08Slide presentation 4 q08
Slide presentation 4 q08Cia Hering RI
 
LEARmorganstanley
LEARmorganstanleyLEARmorganstanley
LEARmorganstanleyfinance16
 
Slide presentation 2 q09
Slide presentation 2 q09Slide presentation 2 q09
Slide presentation 2 q09Cia Hering RI
 
Gca shell group 2
Gca shell group 2Gca shell group 2
Gca shell group 2seeday
 
LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
 LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meetfinance16
 
LEAR 2005_msglobalautoconf
 LEAR 2005_msglobalautoconf LEAR 2005_msglobalautoconf
LEAR 2005_msglobalautoconffinance16
 
Siemens acquisition of Dade Behring
Siemens acquisition of Dade BehringSiemens acquisition of Dade Behring
Siemens acquisition of Dade BehringDheeman Vaidya
 
Una mirada a la situación tecnológica a través del caso Intel Norberto Mateos...
Una mirada a la situación tecnológica a través del caso Intel Norberto Mateos...Una mirada a la situación tecnológica a través del caso Intel Norberto Mateos...
Una mirada a la situación tecnológica a través del caso Intel Norberto Mateos...EOI Escuela de Organización Industrial
 
NPK Investment Report - 9.23.10
NPK Investment Report - 9.23.10NPK Investment Report - 9.23.10
NPK Investment Report - 9.23.10KevinSami
 
Slide presentation 3 q08
Slide presentation 3 q08Slide presentation 3 q08
Slide presentation 3 q08Cia Hering RI
 

Ähnlich wie 5 industry structure and competition analysis (20)

Slide presentation 1 q09
Slide presentation 1 q09Slide presentation 1 q09
Slide presentation 1 q09
 
Slide presentation 4 q07
Slide presentation 4 q07Slide presentation 4 q07
Slide presentation 4 q07
 
Slide presentation 2 q08
Slide presentation 2 q08Slide presentation 2 q08
Slide presentation 2 q08
 
Prediction case on competitor orientation
Prediction case on competitor orientation Prediction case on competitor orientation
Prediction case on competitor orientation
 
Slide presentation 3 q09
Slide presentation 3 q09Slide presentation 3 q09
Slide presentation 3 q09
 
LEAR 2005 sholders meet
 LEAR  2005 sholders meet LEAR  2005 sholders meet
LEAR 2005 sholders meet
 
Slide presentation 3 q07
Slide presentation 3 q07Slide presentation 3 q07
Slide presentation 3 q07
 
Financial analysis total sa - total sa explores for, produces, refines, tra...
Financial analysis   total sa - total sa explores for, produces, refines, tra...Financial analysis   total sa - total sa explores for, produces, refines, tra...
Financial analysis total sa - total sa explores for, produces, refines, tra...
 
Slide presentation 4 q08
Slide presentation 4 q08Slide presentation 4 q08
Slide presentation 4 q08
 
LEARmorganstanley
LEARmorganstanleyLEARmorganstanley
LEARmorganstanley
 
Slide presentation 2 q09
Slide presentation 2 q09Slide presentation 2 q09
Slide presentation 2 q09
 
itw 04 AR
itw 04 ARitw 04 AR
itw 04 AR
 
itw 04AR
itw 04ARitw 04AR
itw 04AR
 
Gca shell group 2
Gca shell group 2Gca shell group 2
Gca shell group 2
 
LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
 LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
LEAR ip 2004_sholders_meet
 
LEAR 2005_msglobalautoconf
 LEAR 2005_msglobalautoconf LEAR 2005_msglobalautoconf
LEAR 2005_msglobalautoconf
 
Siemens acquisition of Dade Behring
Siemens acquisition of Dade BehringSiemens acquisition of Dade Behring
Siemens acquisition of Dade Behring
 
Una mirada a la situación tecnológica a través del caso Intel Norberto Mateos...
Una mirada a la situación tecnológica a través del caso Intel Norberto Mateos...Una mirada a la situación tecnológica a través del caso Intel Norberto Mateos...
Una mirada a la situación tecnológica a través del caso Intel Norberto Mateos...
 
NPK Investment Report - 9.23.10
NPK Investment Report - 9.23.10NPK Investment Report - 9.23.10
NPK Investment Report - 9.23.10
 
Slide presentation 3 q08
Slide presentation 3 q08Slide presentation 3 q08
Slide presentation 3 q08
 

Mehr von dannygriff1

Stocks&bonds2214 1
Stocks&bonds2214 1Stocks&bonds2214 1
Stocks&bonds2214 1dannygriff1
 
Profitability&npv
Profitability&npvProfitability&npv
Profitability&npvdannygriff1
 
Ec2204 tutorial 8(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 8(2)Ec2204 tutorial 8(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 8(2)dannygriff1
 
Ec2204 tutorial 4(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 4(1)Ec2204 tutorial 4(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 4(1)dannygriff1
 
Ec2204 tutorial 3(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 3(1)Ec2204 tutorial 3(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 3(1)dannygriff1
 
Ec2204 tutorial 2(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 2(2)Ec2204 tutorial 2(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 2(2)dannygriff1
 
Ec2204 tutorial 1(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 1(2)Ec2204 tutorial 1(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 1(2)dannygriff1
 
6 price and output determination- monopoly
6 price and output determination- monopoly6 price and output determination- monopoly
6 price and output determination- monopolydannygriff1
 
4 production and cost
4  production and cost4  production and cost
4 production and costdannygriff1
 
3 consumer choice
3 consumer choice3 consumer choice
3 consumer choicedannygriff1
 
2 demand-supply and elasticity
2  demand-supply and elasticity2  demand-supply and elasticity
2 demand-supply and elasticitydannygriff1
 
1 goals of the firm
1  goals of the firm1  goals of the firm
1 goals of the firmdannygriff1
 
Ec2204 tutorial 6(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 6(1)Ec2204 tutorial 6(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 6(1)dannygriff1
 
Is2215 lecture7 lecturer_ado_intro
Is2215 lecture7 lecturer_ado_introIs2215 lecture7 lecturer_ado_intro
Is2215 lecture7 lecturer_ado_introdannygriff1
 

Mehr von dannygriff1 (20)

Stocks&bonds2214 1
Stocks&bonds2214 1Stocks&bonds2214 1
Stocks&bonds2214 1
 
Risk08a
Risk08aRisk08a
Risk08a
 
Profitability&npv
Profitability&npvProfitability&npv
Profitability&npv
 
Npvrisk
NpvriskNpvrisk
Npvrisk
 
Npv2214(1)
Npv2214(1)Npv2214(1)
Npv2214(1)
 
Irr(1)
Irr(1)Irr(1)
Irr(1)
 
Npv rule
Npv ruleNpv rule
Npv rule
 
Ec2204 tutorial 8(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 8(2)Ec2204 tutorial 8(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 8(2)
 
Ec2204 tutorial 4(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 4(1)Ec2204 tutorial 4(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 4(1)
 
Ec2204 tutorial 3(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 3(1)Ec2204 tutorial 3(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 3(1)
 
Ec2204 tutorial 2(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 2(2)Ec2204 tutorial 2(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 2(2)
 
Ec2204 tutorial 1(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 1(2)Ec2204 tutorial 1(2)
Ec2204 tutorial 1(2)
 
6 price and output determination- monopoly
6 price and output determination- monopoly6 price and output determination- monopoly
6 price and output determination- monopoly
 
4 production and cost
4  production and cost4  production and cost
4 production and cost
 
3 consumer choice
3 consumer choice3 consumer choice
3 consumer choice
 
2 demand-supply and elasticity
2  demand-supply and elasticity2  demand-supply and elasticity
2 demand-supply and elasticity
 
1 goals of the firm
1  goals of the firm1  goals of the firm
1 goals of the firm
 
Ec2204 tutorial 6(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 6(1)Ec2204 tutorial 6(1)
Ec2204 tutorial 6(1)
 
Mcq sample
Mcq sampleMcq sample
Mcq sample
 
Is2215 lecture7 lecturer_ado_intro
Is2215 lecture7 lecturer_ado_introIs2215 lecture7 lecturer_ado_intro
Is2215 lecture7 lecturer_ado_intro
 

5 industry structure and competition analysis

  • 1. EC2204- Business Economics 5: Industry Structure and Competition Analysis
  • 2. Learning Outcomes Upon completing this section, the student should be able to:  Distinguish between the various market structures.  Calculate concentration ratios.  Interpret Herfindahl index values.  Describe and illustrate Porters Five Forces.  Distinguish between long and short-run conditions in perfect competition.  Calculate equilibrium conditions and profit maximizing levels of output.  Distinguish between long and short-run conditions in monopolistic competition.
  • 3. Market Structures  The convention is to divide industries into categories according to the degree of competition that exists between the firms within the industry. There are 4 such categories: 1. At one extreme is perfect competition, where there are very many firms competing. Each firm is so small relative to the whole industry that it has no power to influence price. It is a price taker. 2. At the other extreme is monopoly, where there is just one firm in the industry, and hence no competition from within the industry. 3. In the middle comes monopolistic competition, where there are quite a lot of firms competing and where there is freedom for new firms to enter and exit the industry, and 4. Oligopoly, where there are only a few firms and where entry of new firms is restricted.
  • 4. Categories of Market Structure To distinguish more precisely between the four categories, the following must be considered:  How freely can firms enter the industry: is entry free or restricted? If it is restricted, just how great are the barriers to the entry of new firms?  The nature of the product. Do all firms produce an identical product, or do firms produce their own particular brand or model or variety?  The degree of control the firm has over price. Is the firm a price taker or can it choose its price, and if it can, how will changing its price affect its profits?  What we are talking about here is the nature of the demand curve it faces. How elastic is it? If it puts up its price, will it lose (a) all its sales (a horizontal demand curve), or (b) a large proportion of its sales (a relatively elastic demand curve), or (c) just a small proportion of its sales (a relatively inelastic demand curve)?
  • 5. How do we distinguish the market structure? •In Economics, the concentration ratio of an industry is used as an indicator of the relative size of firms in relation to the industry as a whole. •This may also assist in determining the market form of the industry. •One commonly used concentration ratio is the four-firm concentration ratio, which consists of the market share, as a percentage, of the four largest firms in the industry. •In general, the N-firm concentration ratio is the percentage of market output generated by the N largest firms in the industry. •The concentration ratio has a fair amount of correlation to the Herfindahl Index, another indicator of firm size.
  • 6. Concentration Ratios Microprocessor (Pentium Chips) Major US Airlines Company % Market Share Company % Market Share Intel 86% Amercan 20.6% Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) 9 United 20.4 Others 5 Delta 15.8 North-west 14.0 US Beer Sales Continental 10.5 Anheuser-Busch (Bud) 44.9% US-Airways 9.5 Miller 22.5 TWA 9.3 Coors 9.9 US Gasoline Market Strobs 8.3 Shell 8.9% Heilman 6.4 Chevron 8.3 Pabst 3.3 Texaco 7.8 Genessee 1.1 Exxon 7.8 Others 3.7 Amoco 7.5 Mobil 7.5
  • 7. Concentration Ratios Company % Market Share Company % Market Share Read-to-Eat Cereal BP America 5.9 Kellog 35% Citgo 5.4 General Mills 25 Marathon 5.2 Post 12 Sun 4.2 Ralston 7 Phillips 3.5 Quaker 6 Unocol 3.5 Nabisco 4 Arco 3.1 Private Label 10 Conoco 2.6 Others 1 Others 19.5 Music (albums) Soft Drinks Sony 23% Coca-Cola 42% Warner 16 Pepsi 31 BMG 14 Dr Pepper 8 EMI 13 Seven-Up 4 Universal 11 Schweppes 3 Polygram 10 Others 12 Others 13
  • 8. Calculating Concentration Ratios You are asked to determine whether the Computer Industry computer industry or the mobile phone Firm Dell HP Toshiba Freecom PNY Sony Apple IBM industry is more competitive using a 4- Sales 337 384 696 321 769 358 521 880 firm concentration ratio. Mobile Phone Industry Firm Vodafone 02 Samsung Nokia Motorola Meteor Erikson Eircom Sales 556 899 565 782 463 477 846 911 Step 1: Order the firms in order of sales. C omputer Industr y IBM PNY Toshiba A pple HP Sony Dell Freecom 880 769 696 521 384 358 337 321 Mobile Phone Industr y Eircom 02 Erik son N ok ia Samsung Vodafone Meteor Motorola 911 899 846 782 565 556 477 463 Step 2: calculate the total sales for both industries Computer Industry IBM PNY Toshiba Apple HP Sony Dell Freecom 880 769 696 521 384 358 337 321 4,266 Mobile Phone Industry Eircom 02 Erikson Nokia Samsung Vodafone Meteor Motorola 911 899 846 782 565 556 477 463 5,499
  • 9. Calculating Concentration Ratios You are asked to determine whether the computer industry or the mobile phone industry is more competitive using a 4-firm concentration ratio. Step 3: calculate the total sales for the top 4 firms in each industry. IBM PNY Toshiba Apple Computer 880 769 696 521 2,866 Eircom 02 Erikson Nokia Mobile Phone 911 899 846 782 3,438 Step 4: calculate 4-firm concentration ratio for both firms Computer 2,866/4,266 = 67.2% (4-firm c- ratio) Mobile Phone 3,438/5,499 = 62.5% (4-firm c- ratio) Interpretation The computer industry (67%) is more concentrated than the mobile phone industry (63%). As there is an inverse relationship between concentration and competition, the mobile phone industry is more competitive in this case. However, you should interpret the results with caution and your evidence should be supported by case studies and further research.
  • 10. Herfindahl Index  It is a measure of the size of firms in relationship to the industry and an indicator of the amount of competition among them.  Named after economists Orris C. Herfindahl and Albert O. Hirschman, it is an economic concept but widely applied in competition law and antitrust.  It is defined as the sum of the squares of the market shares of each individual firm: ie the average market share, weighted by market share.  As such, it can range from 0 to 10,000 moving from a very large amount of very small firms to a single monopolistic producer.  Decreases in the Herfindahl index generally indicate a loss of market power and an increase in competition, whereas increases imply the opposite. where si is the market share of firm i in the market, and n is the number of firms. Thus, in a market with two firms that each have 50 percent market share, the Herfindahl index equals 0.502 + 0.502 =
  • 11. Herfindahl Index  A small index indicates a competitive industry with no dominant players. I  f all firms have an equal share the reciprocal of the index shows the number of firms in the industry.  When firms have unequal shares, the reciprocal of the index indicates the "equivalent" number of firms in the industry.  H index below 0.1 (or 1,000) indicates an un-concentrated index.  H index between 0.1 to 0.18 (or 1,000 to 1,800) indicates moderate concentration.  H index above 0.18 (above 1,800) indicates high concentration.
  • 12. Market Structures Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly Duopoly Many buyers/sellers A few firms Pepsi/Coca-Cola Differentiated product Air travel, Lager Industry Free entry and exit Interdependence between firms Barriers to Entry Monopoly Perfect Competition Firm = Industry Market stalls Intel, ESB Many firms Downward sloping demand curve Homogeneous Product Barriers to Entry Price taker Supernormal profits earned in long-run Perfectly Elastic Curve Free entry and exit
  • 13. Porter’s Five Forces  If the goal in business is to maximise shareholder wealth, the managers will seek a pricing and output strategy that maximises the present value of the future profits of the firm.  The determination of wealth-maximising strategy depends on the production capacity, cost levels, demand characteristics, and the potential for immediate and longer term competition.  Michael Porter of Harvard Business School in 1979 developed a conceptual framework for identifying the threats from competition in a relevant market.  Incumbent firms attempt to secure competitive advantage through their choice of management strategy.  Porter’s Five Force framework conceptualises the forces that determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of a market.  Attractiveness in this context refers to the overall industry profitability.  An "unattractive" industry is one where the combination of forces acts to drive down overall profitability.  A very unattractive industry would be one approaching "pure competition".
  • 14. Porter’s Five Forces The threat of substitute products: The existence of close substitute products increases the The threat of the entry of new competitors: Profitable markets that yield high returns will draw propensity of customers to switch to alternatives in response to price increases (high firms. The results is many new entrants, which will effectively decrease profitability. Unless the entry The elasticity of demand). Threat of substitutes/ most industries, this is the major determinant of the intensity of competitive complements For rivalry: of new firms can be blocked by incumbents, the profit rate will fall towards a competitive level •buyer propensity to substitute competitiveness of the industry. Sometimes rivals compete aggressively new entrants Threat of and sometimes rivals (perfect competition). •relative price performance of substitutes Barriers to entry compete in non-price dimensions such as innovation, marketing, etc. •existence of barriers to entry (patents, rights, etc.) •buyer switching costs •number of competitors •economies of product differences The bargaining power of suppliers: Suppliers of raw materials, components, and services (such as •perceived growth •rate of industry level of product differentiation •brand equitythe firm can be a source of power over the firm. Suppliers may refuse to work with the expertise) to •intermittent industry overcapacity •switching costs or excessively high prices for unique resources. firm, or e.g. charge sunk costs •exit barriers Level of competition •capital requirements industry supplier switching costs relative to firm switching costs in •diversity of competitorsrivalry Sustain •access to distribution of customers: The ability of customers to put the firm under pressure and degree of differentiation of inputs Intensity of The bargaining power and asymmetry Industry •informational complexity Profitability •absolute costthe customer's sensitivity to price changes. presence of substitute inputs advantages itfixed cost allocation per value added • also affects •learning curve advantages firm concentration ratio •supplieradvertising expense concentration ratio concentration to •buyerof level concentration to firm by suppliers relative to threat of backward integration by firms •expected forward integration in industries with high fixed costs •threat of retaliation by incumbents •bargaining leverage, particularly •Economies of relative to selling price of the product cost of inputs scale government policies •buyer volume •Sustainable competitive advantage through improvisation •buyer switching costs relative to firm switching costs Bargaining power of buyers •buyer information availability Buyer concentration •ability to backward integrate Bargaining power of suppliers Number of Suppliers •availability of existing substitute products •buyer price sensitivity •differential advantage (uniqueness) of industry products
  • 15. Perfect Competition  The main characteristics of Perfect Competition are:  1. There are a very large number of sellers competing with each other. Each seller contributes only a very small fraction of total supply. Therefore an individual seller cannot significantly affect market price by altering his output.  2. There are a very large number of buyers. The number of buyers is so large that no individual buyer can significantly influence the market price by altering his volume of purchases.  3. The product is homogeneous i.e. there is no difference between the product of one firm in the industry and the product of any other firm in that industry. Therefore to consumers, the products of the different producers are identical.  4. There is freedom of entry to, and exit from the industry i.e. there are no restrictions preventing firms moving easily into, or out of a particular industry.
  • 16. Perfect Competition  The main characteristics of Perfect Competition are: 5. Perfect Knowledge - producers and sellers are fully aware of the rate of profit being made by the other producers in the industry. All the buyers are assumed to have widespread knowledge of the price being asked for the product in every section of the market. 6. Each producer has a perfectly elastic supply of the factors of production i.e. the producer can employ more factors to increase his output without forcing up the level of factor payments (rents, wages, interest) which currently prevail throughout the industry. This is a reasonable assumption (following assumption 1) because each producer or seller forms a very small element of total output or supply. 7. Each firm aims to maximise its profits. Profit maximization implies that each firm produces an output where Price = Marginal Cost (P = MC). To produce more than this quantity implies that P < MC, which is not the most profitable decision. To produce less than where P = MC, implies that P > MC, and the firm could increase profits by expanding output. In the short-run, a competitive firm may earn economic profits. In the long-run, entry pushes price down to the minimum point of the average cost curve, so that economic profits are zero. 8. Competitive firms cannot charge more than the market price of others, since their product is identical to all others. Hence, competitive firms are price takers.
  • 17. Perfect Competition (industry versus firm) Firm Industry MC S P = D = MR = AR P P D MR = MC D Q Q q (firm) Q (industry)
  • 18. Perfect Competition (Short-Run) Firm ATC > AR, MR MC ATC Costs AVC P D P = D = MR = AR Shut down Rule MR = MC If P < AVC the firm shuts down Q q (firm)
  • 19. Perfect Competition (Short-Run) Firm ATC < P, AR, MR MC Firm making super-normal profits (Shaded grey area) ATC P D Costs P = D = MR = AR MR = MC Q q (firm)
  • 20. Perfect Competition (Long-Run) The existence of supernormal profits (shaded grey area in previous slide) is a short-run condition. Because of the assumption of perfect information potential entrants to the market are attracted by the super-normal profits as there are no barriers to entry. The industry supply curve expands to S1 and the market price falls to P1. When the market price falls, the horizontal demand curve facing each existing firm, as well as each new entrant, also falls. Each firm adjusts its output to it new profit maximising position where MR = MC. So in the long-run MR = MC = AR = ATC in perfect competition. Firm Industry S MC S1 MR = MC = AR = ATC ATC P D P P1 MR = MC D Q Q q1 (firm) Q (industry)
  • 21. Supply in Perfect Competition Short-Run Long-Run The Supply Curve is that portion of MC Curve The Supply Curve is that portion of MC Curve above the AVC above the ATC MC MC ATC ATC AVC AVC P D D MR = MC D Q Q q (firm) q (firm)
  • 22. Monopolistic Competition The main characteristics are: • many buyers and sellers. • differentiated product. • free entry and exit. • no collusion among the firms. • Each firm will view its demand curve as declining in its own price. • A monopolistically competitive firm will have to have a pricing strategy, unlike a purely competitive firm. • Differentiation occurs when consumers perceive that a product differs from its competition on any physical or non-physical characteristic, including price. Examples: restaurants, dealer-owned gas stations, Video rental stores, book & convenience stores, etc.
  • 23. Monopolistic Competition (short-run) In the Short-Run firms produce where MR = MC, price (P) on the demand curve, P > MC, economic profits exist (shaded) as P > AC, there exists incentives for entry into this industry. Entry in this industry steals customers, demand shifts inwards. Super-normal profits earned in short-run Price MR = MC (Shaded) (monopolistic competition) But AR > AC MC AC P Average Costs (AC) not minimised MR = MC D = AR q MR
  • 24. Monopolistic Competition (long-run) The profit maximising level of output is where MR = MC, like monopoly. P= AC, like perfect competition. Super-normal profits are zero as in perfect competition. However, at the profit maximising level of output average costs are not minimised, output is not at the least cost point on the average cost curve as in perfect competition. Price MR = MC (monopolistic AR = AC competition) P = AC MC AC P No super-normal profits earned in long-run, because of the assumption of no barriers to Average Costs (AC) entry not minimised MR = MC D = AR q MR
  • 25. Sample Questions Q1: For the industry: QS = 3000 + 200P and QD = 13500 - 500P. For the perfectly competitive firm: FC = 50, MC = 15 - 4Q + 3Q2/10 and AVC = 15 - 2Q + Q2/10. Calculate (a) The optimal output for this firm? (b) The total revenue of the firm at the profit maximising level of output. (c) The total costs of the firm. (d) The profit of the firm, Solution: Find equilibrium price. Set QS = QD 3000 + 200P = 13500 - 500P. 10500 / 700 = P so P = 15. At this price, the firm produces where P = MC, (perfect competition) so 15 = 15 - 4Q + 3Q2/10 4Q = 0.3Q2 so 4 = 0.3Q (a) so Q = 4/0.3 = 13.33 (Optimal output) Profit = TR - TC at this output. Profit = TR[P*Q] - [FC + VC] (b) TR = 15*13.33 = 199.95 TC = 50 + VC AVC = 15 - 2Q + Q2/10 VC = AVC*Q = 15 - 2Q + Q2/10 * Q = 15Q – 2Q2 + Q3/10 VC = 15(13.33) – 2(13.33)2 + (13.33)3/10 = 81.43 (c) TC = 50 + 81.43 = 131.43 (i.e. FC + VC) (d) Profit = [TR – TC] = [199.95 – 131.43] = 68.52
  • 26. Sample Questions Q2: Determine the optimal output, Q, for the following firm where TR = 14Q, and TC = 48+Q+0.5Q2. Does the data show whether the firm is perfectly competitive, monopolistically competitive, oligopoly or monopoly? Solution: TR = 14Q, TC = 48+Q+0.5Q2. π = TR -TC π = 14Q – [48+Q+0.5Q2] π = -48 + 13Q -0.5Q2 ∆π = 13 − Q = 0 ∆Q ∆π =0 ∆Q so Q = 13 (optimal level of output where where π is maximised) The firm is perfectly competitive because Price is a constant €14 As TR = P * Q, TR =14Q
  • 27. MCQ Questions 3.`Which is NOT a characteristic of an industry that displays perfect competition? a. free entry b. heterogeneous product c. many sellers d. free exit. 4. For a competitive firm, if MC is below price: a. raise output to raise profit, b. reduce output to raise profit, c. raise price to raise profit, d. reduce price to raise profit. 5. In a competitive industry, if costs of production rise, we anticipate that: a. price will rise and quantity will stay about the same, b. price will rise and quantity will rise. c. price will rise and quantity will fall, d. price will decline to make up for the fact that costs
  • 28. Recall Our Learning Outcomes You should now be able to:  Distinguish between the various market structures.  Calculate concentration ratios.  Interpret Herfindahl index values.  Describe and illustrate Porters Five Forces.  Distinguish between long and short-run conditions in perfect competition.  Calculate equilibrium conditions and profit maximizing levels of output.  Distinguish between long and short-run conditions in monopolistic competition.