2. Gumberg Library’s status
• Our subscription to RefWorks will expire on June 30, 2014.
• Variety of citation management tools available, both free and at
cost.
• We will offer assistance with transitioning to several in the coming
months.
• Which one should you use?
3. RefWorks (Institutional Subscription)
• The current citation management system supported by Gumberg Library
• Web-based
• Stores references
• Formats them in hundreds of different styles
• Generate bibliographies
• Need to download and install the Write-N-Cite feature
• Format a paper with in-text citations and bibliography
4. Transitioning to Other Citation Management
Tools from Current RefWorks Account
• You CAN export your RefWorks database to other Citation Management
Software.
• You CANNOT export your Attachments; you will have to do that
manually.
• If exporting to a non-RefWorks alternative, you must take extra steps to
maintain your folder structure.
6. RefWorks (Individual Subscription)
• Costs $100/year
• Same features as RefWorks (Institutional Subscription) EXCEPT:
• Attachments is NOT a feature for Individual Subscriptions
• The Find It link to full text in Duquesne databases will NOT appear
7. RefWorks (Individual Subscription)
Pros
• Most of the same features and
strengths of RefWorks
(Institutional)
Cons
• Cost = $100/year
• No Attachments feature available
• No Find It link available
• Same weaknesses as RefWorks
(Institutional)
8. Zotero
• Web-based with stand alone desktop download
• Free
• Download “connector” to your browser
• Works with Firefox, Chrome, and Safari
9. Zotero
• Easy to add online sources with browser icon.
• Features
• Stores sources
• Formats them in a variety of styles
• Generates a bibliography
• With a free account, can sync with your other devices
10. Zotero Pros/Cons
Pros
•
•
•
•
•
Free
Web-based
Easy to add sources
Plug-ins for Word/Open Office
Syncs with Zotero cloud and
other devices
Cons
• Must install browser connector to
capture database/DuCat citations
• Not user-friendly with IE, which
is the DU default browser
• Must install Zotero Stand Alone
software on personal computer
11. Mendeley
•
•
•
•
•
•
Free and web-based
Focused on community, research sharing
“Crowd sourced literature discovery”
Tools for annotation
“Find relevant papers based on what you are reading”
Great for collaboration
12. Mendeley Pros/Cons
Pros
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Free
Web-based w/ Desktop Version
Web Import, Drag & Drop
Ease of adding PDFs
Social Media for Research
Plug-ins for Word/OpenOffice
Made to interface with Google Scholar
Mobile access
Cons
•
•
•
•
•
Syncing
Exporting (catalogs & databases)
Less intuitive than Zotero, RefWorks
Renders citations poorly
Cannot generate bibliographies
independently
13. EndNote
•
•
•
•
•
•
Installed on desktop, but can access and manage from EndNote online
Stores large number of sources
Creates bibliographies in over 5,000 styles
Can format paper with Cite While You Write (like Write-N-Cite)
Opens, annotates, and searches PDF files
Can share references
14. EndNote
Pros
• Good option for storing large
numbers of references
• Formats papers and bibliographies
in thousands of styles
• Allows storage and annotation of
PDFs
Cons
• Not web-based; has to be installed
on computer
• Cost
• Some issues with how well citations
render
15. Comparison of Features
• Comparison Chart handout
• RefWorks and EndNote are citation tools
• Zotero and Mendeley are research tools that include a citation manager as
one of their features
17. Further Exploration
•
•
•
•
RefWorks
• Choosing a Citation Manager, University of Washington
Zotero
• Citation Managers: Comparison of Features, UWM
Mendeley
EndNote
• Tool Comparisons, Harvard Library
• Comparison of Reference Management Software, Wikipedia
Check out Gumberg
Library’s:
Citation Management Guide
18. The Right Tool for You
• Review the different options available
• Select the software that meets YOUR needs
• Gumberg Library will be providing resources and training to help you make
the transition