1. A Growing Australian Gold Producer
CORPORATE PRESENTATION TSX: CRK
FEBRUARY 2013 OTCQX: CROCF
2. Forward Looking Information
This presentation contains forward-looking information under Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the development
potential and timetable of the projects; the Company’s ability to raise additional funds as necessary or on commercially reasonable terms; the future price of gold; the estimation of mineral
resources and mineral reserves; conclusions of economic evaluation (including scoping studies); the realization of mineral resource and reserve estimates; the timing and amount of estimated
future production, development and exploration; costs of future activities; capital and operating expenditures; success of exploration activities; mining or processing issues; currency exchange
rates; government regulation of mining operations; and environmental risks. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”,
“expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or
statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of
management as of the date such statements are made. Estimates regarding the anticipated timing, amount and cost of mining at the projects are based on assumptions underlying mineral
resource estimates and the realization of such estimates; results of previous mining activities at the projects, and detailed research and analysis completed by independent of the Company;
research and estimates regarding the timing of delivery for long-lead items; knowledge regarding the factors consultants and management involved in building a mine and other factors described
in the technical reports and Annual Information Form filed under the profile of the Company on SEDAR. Capital and operating cost estimates are based on results of previous mining activities,
research of the Company and independent consultants, recent estimates of construction and mining costs and other factors that are set out in the scoping study. Production estimates are based
on mine plans and production schedules, which have been developed by the Company’s personnel and independent consultants. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking information, including but not limited to risks related to: timing and availability of external financing on acceptable terms; unexpected events and delays during construction,
expansion and start-up; variations in ore grade and recovery rates; receipt and revocation of government approvals; actual results of exploration and mining activities; changes in project parameters
as plans continue to be refined; future prices of gold; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry. Although
management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other
factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-
looking information except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Investors are advised that National Instrument NI 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators requires that each category of mineral reserves and mineral resources be reported
separately. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Due to the uncertainty of measured, indicated or inferred mineral resources, these mineral
resources may never be upgraded to proven and probable mineral reserves.
Certain information contained herein may be considered to be future-oriented financial information, which was designed and approved by management of Crocodile Gold for the purposes of
assessing the value of the acquisition. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for their use, and readers should consult their financial advisors as appropriate.
Bill Nielsen P.Geo.,Vice President of Exploration at Crocodile Gold, is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical
information and data included in this presentation
This presentation is being made available on a confidential basis only to persons in the United States reasonably believed to be “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 501(a) under the U.S.
Securities Act (“Accredited Investors”) and specifically authorized to view this presentation. This information does not constitute an offer to any other person or, a general offer to the public of, or the
general solicitation from the public of, offers to subscribe or purchase any of securities of Crocodile Gold Corp. . Any unauthorized use of the presentation is strictly prohibited. Distribution of this
information to any person is unauthorized, and any disclosure of any of such information without the prior written consent of Crocodile Gold is prohibited. Except as specifically provided herein, this
presentation may not be copied or otherwise distributed, in whole or in part, by or to any person or in any medium whatsoever.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated or Inferred Resources
The information presented uses the terms “measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” mineral resources. United States investors are advised that while such terms are recognized and required by
Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these terms. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their
existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules,
estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or
indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is
economically or legally mineable.
2
3. Cautionary Notes
Non-IFRS Measures
Crocodile Gold believes that investors use certain indicators to assess gold mining companies. The indicators are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards.
“Cash Cost per Ounce” is a non-IFRS performance measure which could provide an indication of the mining and processing efficiency at the operations. It is determined by dividing the operating
expenses, excluding stock-based compensation allocated to the operating expense and next of silver revenue, by the number of ounces of gold sold. There are variations in the method of
computation of “cash cost per ounce” as determined by the Company compared with other mining companies. For more detail on Cash Cost per Ounce determination for Crocodile Gold, please
visit www.sedar.com or www.crocgold.com and review the latest Annual Financial Statements issued on March 19, 2012.
Note for Pages 7, 8, and 19 : For information regarding mineral resource and reserve estimates, including parameters used to generate the estimates and depletion, please see the technical
reports titled: REPORT ON THE MINERAL RESOURCES & MINERAL RESERVES OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY GOLD AND BASE METALS PROPERTIES FOR CROCODILE GOLD
CORP. dated April 4th, 2011; NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT FOSTERVILLE GOLD MINE, VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA PREPARED FOR CROCODILE GOLD CORP dated April 29 th, 2012; NI43-
101 TECHNICAL REPORT STAWELL GOLD MINE, VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA PREPARED FOR CROCODILE GOLD CORP dated April 9 th, 2012. These documents are available on the company
website and at www.sedar.com.
The 2012 financial results presented herein have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
The Company’s independent auditor has not performed a review of these results in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. The company
expect to release its audited financial results on or before April 2, 2013.
Non-GAAP Measures
Crocodile Gold believes that investors use certain indicators to assess gold mining companies. The indicators are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.
“Cash cost per ounce” is a non-GAAP performance measure that could provide an indication of the mining and processing efficiency and effectiveness at the operations. It is determined by dividing
the operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation allocated to operating expenses and net of silver revenue, by the number of ounces of gold sold. There are variations in the method
of computation of “cash cost per ounce” as determined by the Company compared with other mining companies. The following is a reconciliation of the cash cost per ounce of gold sold, to the
reported operating expenses for the three months ended December 31, September 30, June 30 and March 31, 2012:
Dec 30 Sept 30 June 30 March 31
Operating expenses per consolidated statement of operations
and comprehensive income (loss) 59,645,459 55,557,277 41,720,288 22,405,959
By-product silver sales credit (203,303) (126,723) (105,871) (64,137)
Non-cash stock option expense charged to operating - - - (240,861)
expenses
Operating cash costs 59,442,156 55,430,554 41,614,417 22,100,961
Divided by ounces of gold sold 59,541 47,121 35,665 10,900
Cash cost per ounce ($ per ounce) 998 1,176 1,167 2,028
3
4. Investment Highlights
Production increased from 77,000 oz in 2011
GROWING GOLD to 155,000 oz in 2012
PRODUCTION 2013 production expected to be 175,000 oz
Cash flow from operation in Q4 2012: ~$39 All within
GROWING CASH million Australia – a
FLOW Expect free cash flow of ~ $200 million over first world
next five years country with
one of the
Extensive exploration and development most mining
EXPLORATION pipeline friendly
UPSIDE Outstanding potential to discover additional jurisdictions
resources
Undervalued compared to peers at 0.3x P/NAV
COMPELLING with a peer group median of 0.7x
VALUATION EV/oz of $25 compared to peer group median
of $52
4
5. Crocodile Gold Exceeds Gold Production
Targets with 155,523 ounces in 2012
Average Cash Costs of $1,167 in line with 2012 Guidance
2012 Ounce Production 2012 Cash Costs
70,000 $2,500
60,000 2012 Cost Guidance
Ounces Per Quarter
50,000 $2,000 $1,100 - $1300
40,000
$2,028 Average for 2012: $1,167
$1,500
30,000
20,000
$1,000
10,000 $1,167 $1,176
$998
0 $500
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
CRK Total CRK Total Annualized $0
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2013 Growing Production From :
Ramp-up and optimization at Cosmo Mine – improving mine design, increasing extraction
rate, lowering mining cost.
Optimization of Fosterville operation with expansion of resources and reserve base.
Advancement of Big Hill Project – proceeding with permitting and final design with
potential for production in 2014.
5
6. Growing Gold Production:
Double Digit Annual Growth
5 YEAR PLAN
Growing Production Profile
Existing Operations: Cosmo & Fosterville
Mines
Near-term project: Big Hill*
Longer term: UR-Prospect & Maud Creek
Potential for 14MM tonnes milled and in
excess of 1.2Moz recovered over 5 years
Key Financial Indicators (cumulative-US$)
Revenue: $2.018 Billion
EBITDA: $765 Million
Free Cash Flow: $205 Million
Average cash cost: ~ $875/ounce
*Please refer to cautionary notes on page 12 for PEA disclosures
6
7. Growing Gold Production:
Cosmo Mine
Steady development rate reached in 2012
Commercial production by end of Q1/13
Ramping-up to produce an average of
75,000 to 90,000oz gold per year
Delineation program in progress with 4
underground drills targeting expansion of
Mineral Resources
Proven and Probable Reserves* of 3.1Mt at
4.2 g/t Au for 420,000oz
Measured and Indicated Resources* of Northern Territory 2012 Performance
5.3Mt at 4.6 g/t Au for 776,000 oz Ore Milled (Tonnes) 917,202
Average Grade (g/t Au) 1.51
Cosmo Mine is part of Crocodile Gold’s Northern Territory
Complex which also includes a number of small open pits Recovery(%) 91.6
that are currently not being mined. Cosmo is an all–season 40,731
underground operation located approximately 60km Gold Produced (Ounces)
northwest of Union Reefs Mill . Gold Sold (Ounces) 39,459
*Please refer to cautionary notes on page 3 of this presentation
7
8. Growing Gold Production:
Fosterville Gold Mine
Produced 90,000 oz gold in 2012
Fosterville Processing Facility
Expect to produce similar level in 2013
Announced high-grade gold intersections from drill
holes on strike extending the Phoenix ore body at
Fosterville. Drill results include*:
23.36 g/t Au over 5.70m in hole UDE084
6.21 g/t Au over 6.10m in hole UDE084A
Current mine life of 3 years based on Measured
and Indicated Resources of 13.9Mt at 2.9 g/t Au
for 1,289,000 oz
Drilling programs underway with potential to
extend the mine life Fosterville 2012 Performance
Ore Milled (Tonnes) 786,571
Fosterville Gold Mine is an underground operation located
Average Grade (g/t Au) 4.36
150 km north of Melbourne and 20 km from Bendigo;
accessible by all weather roads. The mine has been Recovery (%) 81.8
producing since 1992 with its own processing facility
Gold Produced (Ounces) 90,439
(capacity of 800 Ktpa) with a bacterial oxidation process
using BIOX technology Gold Sold (Ounces) 90,861
*Please refer to press release dated August 30, 2012 for full technical disclosures
8
9. Growing Gold Production
Stawell Gold Mine
Produced 73,000 oz Au in 2012
Confirmed opportunity to economically treat
historical surface stockpile until mid 2014
Decision to ramp-down underground mining
activities by mid 2013
Next Steps
Exploring opportunities within the existing Stawell Processing Facility
mining lease
Engagement with local stakeholders and
community Stawell 2012 Performance
Ore Milled (Tonnes) 850,017
Average Grade (g/t Au) 3.06
Stawell Gold mine is an underground operation located
alongside the town of Stawell, in central Victoria, Recovery(%) 86.1
approximately 250 km west of Melbourne. Processing 72,602
facilities use standard CIL gold recover and have a capacity Gold Produced (Ounces)
of 1.0MM TPA Gold Sold (Ounces) 74,552
9
11. Exploration and Projects
Increase reserves from 1.1MM oz to 1.5MM oz
Consolidate land position in the Northern Territory
2013 through divestment of non-core assets
OBJECTIVES Advance the Big Hill Project in the State of Victoria
Advance Maud Creek, Union Reefs and Pine Creek Projects
in the Northern Territory Complex
11
12. Exploration and Projects:
State of Victoria
Big Hill Project Description Unit Open Pit
The Big Hill Deposit is the surface expression of the Strip ratio 3.4 to 1
Stawell deposit. It currently has Indicated Resources of
2.83 million tonnes at 1.84 g/t Au for 167,000 oz*. Ore production Mt 2.3
South
Grade Gandy’s g/t 1,65
Project Plan
Recovered ounces oz 108,531
NI 43-101 compliant Preliminary Economic
Revenue AUD$(mm) 153
Assessment (PEA) completed
LOM Capital AUD$(mm) 21.7
Ore would be treated at the existing
NPV ($1,400/oz, 10% DR) AUD$(mm) 39.6
Stawell Gold Mine mill
Big Hill Project
Estimated 4 ½ years of operation Big Hill Pit
2013 Milestones
Start Permitting process
Production to commence second half of
2014 Stawell Mill
*Please refer to cautionary language on page 3 of this presentation
The PEA is preliminary in nature and is based on a number of assumptions that may be changed in the
future as additional information becomes available. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do
not have demonstrated economic viability. The PEA includes inferred mineral resources that are
considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would
enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized 12
13. Exploration and Projects:
Northern Territory Complex
Maud Creek Project
Located near the town of Katherine, Maud Creek is a partial
refractory ore deposit
Desktop Scoping Study completed in Q4 2012
Applicability of Fosterville BIOX® technology confirmed
Open pit to be followed by underground operation
Ore would be treated at existing Union Reefs mill in
separate circuit
Prospect
Preliminary mine design identified the opportunity of Union
producing approximately 300,000 ounces over 6 years Reefs Mill Moline
International
2013 Milestones
Proceed with Prefeasibility Study including:
additional drilling to capture detailed metallurgical and
Maud Creek
geotechnical information
Initial community engagement and existing Environmental
Impact Study update
2014 Development Decision
13
14. Exploration and Projects:
Northern Territory Complex
Union Reefs, Prospect
Union Reefs – Prospect Deposit and Crosscourse
Union North
The Prospect Deposit is located within 1 km of existing Lady Alice
infrastructure with historical production treated at the Prospect
Union Reefs mill
Completed a 11,500 m drilling program; key Crosscourse
exploration results include*:
Union
Prospect: 4.2 m@27g/t Au, 2.5 m@240g/t Au Reefs Mill
Complex
Crosscourse: 181.2 m@1.8 g/t Au, 12.3 m@8.9 g/t Au
Desktop study completed in 2012 identified the
opportunity of producing approximately 60,000
ounces over 3 years from Prospect
2013 Milestones
Proceed with Phase II – Underground exploration
decline for Prospect with Bulk Sampling
2014 Production Decision
* Refer to Oct 13, 2011, Jan 20, 2012 and May 9, 2012 press releases for detailed results
14
15. Capital Structure
Share Structure (At February 1, 2013) Major Shareholder – Luxor Capital
Basic: 406.4 Million In February 2012, Luxor Capital completed a bid to
take up a majority ownership of Crocodile Gold.
Warrants: 46.75 Million
Since that time, Luxor has assisted the Company
Options: 029.8 Million in many ways including:
Fully Diluted: 483.35 Million Participation on a pro-rata basis in the last
private placement financing
Market Capitalization: $142.2 Million
Facilitation of the Victorian assets acquisition as
52 Week Trading Range $0.29 – $0.60
well as aiding in arrangement of the Credit
Cash Position $23 Million Suisse facility
52 Week Share Price Performance Luxor is very active in the management and
$0.70 oversight of the Company with 2 current board
$0.60 members. Luxor has also indicated interest for any
$0.50
future financings – It currently owns 65% of
$0.40
$0.30 Crocodile Gold.
$0.20
$0.10
$0.00
15
16. Company Valuation
Gold Producers Economic Value/Oz Gold Producer P/NAV Multiples
$200.00
1.0x
$150.00 0.8x 0.8x 0.8x 0.7x 0.7x
0.6x
0.6x
$100.00
$52.70 0.3x 0.3x
$50.00
$25.61
$0.00
TGZ OGC EDV RSG BAA Median GSC JAG SBM ORA CRK RSG TGZ OGC SBM GSC JAG EDV BAA ORA CRK
Source: Bloomberg and company disclosure. Source: Consensus Estimates, Bloomberg.
Economic Value is equal to market cap less cash plus debt plus minority interest
Add bullets
and preferred equity
Per ounce, Crocodile Gold is valued at $25.61 – significantly less than the peer median of
$52.70 per ounce, yet production profiles of the peer group are similar.
Crocodile Gold is trading at 0.3x its Net Asset Value which suggests that the full value of
the Company’s projects are not being attributed to in the current share price. The median
P/NAV of the peer group is 0.7x
16
17. Growth Strategy
Stakeholder Engagement
Debt Facility - $75 million
Growth strategy supported by Credit Suisse and agreement in principle
reached to amend the present debt facility as follow:
Proceeds from “cash out” of call options to be applied against the
capital repayment
Deferral of principal payment
Continue with gold swap payment
Key Shareholder
Support and engagement of Luxor in developing growth strategy
Active participation on Board
17
18. Mineral Resources
and Reserves *
Tonnes Au Grade Au
(MM) (g/t) (Koz)
Proven & Probable Reserves
Cosmo 3.1 4.2 420
Fosterville 2.4 4.7 365
Pine Creek 3.0 1.7 162
Stawell 1.0 3.4 107 Crocodile Gold maintains
Burnside 1.6 1.5 80
Reserves 11.1 3.2 1,134 significant Measured and
Measured and Indicated Resources (incl. of Reserves)
Indicated Resources of
Fosterville 13.9 2.9 1,289 over 4 million ounces
Maud Creek 9.3 3.1 935
Cosmo 5.3 4.6 776 and Inferred Resources of
Mt Bundy 20.2 1.0 665
Burnside 11.3 1.4 493 2.7 million ounces.
Stawell 4.7 2.6 399
Pine Creek 5.5 1.6 289
Union Reefs 0.2 2.4 18
M&I Resources 70.5 2.1 4,863 Reserves for Crocodile
Inferred Resources
Gold’s projects total
Cosmo
Burnside
5.7
13.0
3.7
1.5
676
647
approximately
Fosterville 5.0 2.9 477 1.1 million ounces.
Mt Bundy 10.5 1.0 351
Union Reefs 3.7 1.7 204
Pine Creek 2.3 2.4 183
Stawell 1.0 4.7 145
Maud Creek 1.1 2.4 82
Inferred Resources 42.4 2.0 2,765
*Please refer to cautionary language on page 3 of this presentation 18
19. Why Invest in Crocodile Gold
Crocodile Gold has Growing Production
Doubled production over 2011, with 155,523 oz produced
2012 production targets were exceeded
Production is expected to increase 10-15% in 2013, putting the company in an
exclusive group of producers
Crocodile Gold has Cash Flow
Mine operations generated Net Cash Flow of ~ $60mm in 2012.
Expect EBITDA of $765mm; Free Cash Flow of $200mm over the next 5 years
Crocodile Gold has a Significant Exploration & Project Pipeline
Clear project pipeline over 5 years that includes:
• Big Hill
• Union Reefs Prospect Deposit
• Maud Creek
Crocodile Gold is one of the cheapest mid-tier Gold Producers
Making this an excellent entry point. If CRK increased to peer median P/NAV of 0.7x,
shares would appreciate over 100%
19
20. Management
Chantal Lavoie, P. Eng., Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Lavoie is a Professional Mining Engineer with extensive experience in mining operations and projects. Previously, Mr. Lavoie spent eight years at De
Beers Canada Inc. ("De Beers") where he was responsible for the Canadian operations of De Beers including Snap Lake and Victor Mines, the Gahcho Kue
Project and was acting CEO of De Beers. Mr. Lavoie has also worked for Barrick Gold Corporation at Goldstrike in Nevada and Aur Resources Inc. at the
former Louvicourt mine.
Robert Dufour, CPA, CA, Director of Finance, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Dufour is a Chartered Accountant with over 10 years of finance and accounting experience. He started his career with the Toronto office of
PriceWaterhouseCoopers and later joined Northgate Minerals Corporation as Corporate Controller and subsequently was promoted to Group Financial
Controller for Northgate Australian Venture Corporation (NAVCO), which was more recently acquired by Crocodile Gold Corporation.
Bill Nielsen, P. Geo, Vice President Exploration
Mr. Nielsen is an accredited geologist with over 35 years of worldwide mineral exploration and development experience. Most recently, he has been
working as a senior industry consultant to mining exploration companies working with a variety of commodities in various countries and geological
environments. From 2003 to 2008, Mr. Nielsen was the V.P. Exploration of Nevsun Resources Ltd., where he played a significant role in the discovery of
the Bisha gold-VMS deposit in Eritrea. He has worked for various companies within the Forbes & Manhattan Group since early 2010.
Colinda Parent, Vice President Corporate Development
Ms. Parent has extensive capital markets experience having spent over 15 years in institutional equity sales and 5 years in investment banking in
Toronto. Previously, Ms. Parent was one of the founders of Sandfire Securities, a Toronto-based institutional equity boutique focused on raising funds
for and trading stocks in small and mid-cap Canadian-listed resource companies. She also served on the Board and Executive Committee at Sandfire. Ms.
Parent is a CFA charter holder and has an MBA from the Ivey School of Business.
Operations Team : Ian Holland, General Manager, Stawell Gold Mine
Troy Cole, General Manager, Fosterville Gold Mine
Peter Crooks, General Manager, Northern Territory
20
21. Board Of Directors
Kevin Conboy, Director
Mr. Conboy was previously President and Chief Executive Officer of Acordia, Inc., a subsidiary of Wells Fargo based in Chicago. As well, he
served as Chief Executive Officer for the NIA Group of Paramus, New Jersey. Mr. Conboy possesses a wealth of experience in the financial
markets and has considerable exposure to financial instruments and business transactions. He sits on a number of corporate and charitable
boards. Mr. Conboy completed a B.A. from Colorado State University in 1973.
George Faught, CA, Lead Director
Mr. Faught is a Chartered Accountant with over 25 years of senior management experience and is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Aberdeen
International Inc. He has served as the Chief Financial Officer of publicly traded companies in the natural resources, financial services and
pharmaceutical industries. Mr. Faught has broad financial management, corporate development and operating experience and from 1999 to 2005
served as the Chief Financial Officer for North American Palladium Ltd., a mid-tier platinum group metal producer. Prior to that, he served as Chief
Financial Officer for Hudson Bay Mining & Smelting Co. Ltd., an integrated base metals producer, and William Resources Inc., an international gold
producer. He also serves as a director of several public companies in the resource sector.
Robert Getz, MBA, Director
Mr. Getz is a managing director and a co-founder of Cornerstone Equity Investors, LLC. Mr. Getz has strong experience in public and private debt and
equity financings and domestic and international mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Getz has served as a director of several public and private metals and
mining companies. He completed a B.A., cum laude, International Relations at Boston University in May 1985, and obtained his MBA, Finance in
February 1990 from The Stern School of Business at New York University.
Peter Tagliamonte, P. Eng., Director
Mr. Tagliamonte is a professional mining engineer and also holds an MBA from the Richard Ivey School of Business, at the University of Western Ontario.
He is currently the President and CEO of Sulliden Gold, the former President and CEO of Central Sun Mining Inc. and former Chief Operating Officer of
Desert Sun Mining Corp. where he was responsible for the development of the Jacobina Mine in Brazil into a 4,200-tonne-per-day mining operation. Mr.
Tagliamonte has over 25 years of progressive managerial experience building and operating mines worldwide, notably in Central and South America. In
2005, he received the Mining Journal's "Mine Manager of the Year" award in recognition for his work in the mining sector.
21
22. Investor Contact Information
Crocodile Gold Corporation
Chantal Lavoie Investor Relations
Chairman, President and CEO Rob Hopkins
416-861-2964 416-861-5899
clavoie@crocgold.com info@crocgold.com
TSX: CRK www.crocgold.com
OTCQX: CROCF Find us on:
FRANKFURT: XGC
A Member of the Forbes & Manhattan Group of Companies
22
