2. Basic Stakeholder Framework
IMPACTS
COMPANY
Customers
(current, future)
(Community)
Owners/Banks
Government
NGOs
Workers
2
3. Environmental Value Drivers
Process efficiency
Buyer preferences
Access to more “ecological” international markets
Official business relationships
Environmental performance and competition in the
domestic market
Incentive for innovation
Lower-risk profiles for funding and investment
3
4. Driver # 1: Process Efficiency
Ecoefficiency
material used/in product material
new concept:
energy and material quantity per
“service unit” ==> “dematerialization”
Thousands of well-known examples
4
5. Driver # 2:
Buyer preferences
Trend toward customers looking for better
performance
for customers and other stakeholders (both current
and future)
due to requirements from markets
by philosophy and conviction
Good and bad news
Challenges for those not seeing them
Exciting opportunities
5
6. Driver # 3: Access to more “ecological”
international markets
Fairly new trend
“Market rules” set the guidelines
Non-official
No GMOs, organic
recycled content
ISO 14001
more sustainable tourism
More official
“product take-back” requirements
6
7. Driver # 4: Official
business relationships
The most complex
Particularly important in relation to product
content
traces of carcinogenic substances
Also process issues
WTO role? UNFCC?
Obviously, governments can protect the
population
7
8. Driver # 5: Environmental competition in the
domestic market
Local companies are already worried
Multinational companies in industrial countries
have up to 30-year experience in creating and
using environmental development as a market
position.
They are not afraid to use it against local
rivals.
8
9. Driver # 6: Incentive for Innovation
Less evidence than other areas
Companies under environmental pressure
innovate faster (“Porter Hypothesis”)
cases: Bacardi, de-icing, paper and pulp
Rate of change is accelerating
few companies have experience in this area
9
10. Driver # 7: Lower-risk profiles for funding
International banks acknowledge risk
Evidence for serious problems due to a lack of
in-depth evaluation
Up to 50 basis points premium with ISO 14001
(10% of leading banks?)
Relation with IFC and The World Bank,
multinationals
10
11. Opportunities in “Products for the Future”
Good and bad news
Favored versus un-favored sectors
However, performance is important in all
Alternative energy
willing to pay up to 15% extra for non-fossil energy
Agriculture -- organic has 20% annual increase
Tourism -- fastest growing segments?
11
12. Are companies creating value
from their environmental performance?
Solid supporting evidence
Case studies
Solid theory
Evidence in research on historical performance
at market level
Emergence of “Ecoefficient” or “Sustainable”
Funds
12
13. Company Valuation
Costs
Strategic
And
Earnings
Cash
Policy
Change
Flow
Decisions
In
Value
Risks
Cost of Capital
Source: Adapted from Rappaport1976
13
14. Valuation: Environmental Elements
• Energy Efficiency
• Material Efficiency
• “Dematerialization”
• Reduction of Toxicity
Costs
Strategic
And
Earnings
Cash
Change
Policy
Flow
In
Decisions
Value
Risks
Cost of Capital
14
15. Valuation: Environmental Elements
• New products
• New markets
• New clients
• Price premium
Costs
Strategic
And
Earnings
Cash
Change
Policy
Flow
In
Decisions
Value
Risks
Cost of Capital
15
16. Valuation: Environmental Elements
• Regulatory Risk
• Risk of Direct action
• ”Social license”
• Site contamination
Costs
Strategic
And
Earnings
Cash
Change
Policy
Flow
In
Decisions
Value
Risks
Cost of Capital
16
17. Valuation: Environmental Elements
• Special credit lines
• Company image
• Lower risk profile
• Venture Capital (high growth
companies)
Costs
Strategic
And
Earnings
Cash
Change
Policy
Flow
In
Decisions
Value
Riskis
Cost of Capital
17