This document contains several passages about different topics: 1) The first passage discusses conspiracy theories about Barack Obama's identity and calls for him to provide proof of details about his life. 2) The second warns against discussing confidential personnel or legal issues in open meetings and recommends having legal counsel present when topics could violate privacy laws. 3) The third discusses the 1944 Education Act in the UK that made uneducable children the responsibility of health and social services instead of providing them statutory education. Funding limitations affected services. 4) The fourth outlines Section 7 of an Act requiring educational establishments to provide admission and access to all courses and facilities for people with disabilities, with exceptions if a student's disability severely impacts

1. UFO Sightings
Noticed the subject performed ya? Just who's Harrison? One will likely can't say for sure unless
Barry Obama, Barry Soretoro, Barak Soretoro, Barry Dunham, Barack Dunham or one of is own
several other alias in the life will step forward and answer that 64K dollar concern.
This kind of stuff happens under our noses everyday and we just put up with it, or never care to
know it's happening. And then I'm called a conspiracy theorist for pointing it out? Everything I said
above is backed with resources. No one gets the benefit of the doubt from me. Everything they do is
to benefit coorporations and screw us, unless they can prove otherwise. I suggest you read this
Article Link I atttach for you to get yourself more informed about what the TRUTH and the FACTS
are.
Introduce no topics that will violate the Right to Privacy Act or breach confidentiality in the open
board meeting. Subjects regarding personnel matters or legal issues should not be addressed during
an open meeting. Legal counsel should attend meetings when the subject matter may require
members to speak on issues that skirt the Open Meeting Act or the Right to Privacy Act. Subsec.
(a)(4)(F). Pub. L. 110-175 , § 5, designated existing provisions as cl. (i) and added cls. (ii) and (iii).
In 1944 local education authorities were given the responsibility to decide whether a child needed
special educational treatment by the Education Act. If a child were to be considered uneducable”
that child then became the responsibility of the Department of Health and Social Services and was
not entitled to statutory education. The major limitation with this Act however, is that all the
services included in the Act are only accessible if sufficient funds are in place.
Section 7 of Part 2 of the Act deals with the providing of admission and access to all courses and

2. facilities for people with disabilities in all educational establishments. With the exception of if the
student's disability and their presence has severe consequences on the learning of other students.
This Act covers the rights of children and the criminal justice system, the word child” has been
defined by section 3 of the Act to mean any person under the age of 18.