SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 5
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35            Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 1 of 5



                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
                           THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                          CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON

  TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU,

         Plaintiff,

  vs.

  DISMAS CHARITIES, INC., ANA GISPERT,
  DEREK THOMAS and ADAMS LESHOTA

        Defendants.
  _________________________________________/

    DEFENDANTS DISMAS CHARTIES, INC., ANA GISPERT, DEREK THOMAS AND
   ADAMS LESHOTA’S BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
                     DOCUMENT FROM THE DOCKET

         Defendants Dismas Charities, Inc., Ana Gispert, Derek Thomas and Adams Lashanda,

  incorrectly identified as Adams Leshota (collectively “Defendants”) by and through their

  undersigned counsel, file their Brief in Response to Plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu’s (“Plaintiff”)

  Motion to Strike Documents from the Docket and alleges as follows:

         1.      Pursuant to Order of the Court, the parties were required to submit a Joint

  Scheduling Report on or before Friday May 20, 2011.

         2.      After substantial time, energy and effort by Defendants’ counsel, Defendants

  presented a proposed Joint Scheduling Report that followed the format recommended by the

  District Court. However, Plaintiff initially refused to accept this form. Plaintiff wanted to

  submit a Joint Scheduling Report having a section that basically contained an almost complete

  recitation of the Complaint.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35              Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 2 of 5


                                              CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON

         3.       After numerous conversations and email communications, Plaintiff agreed to the

  form of the Joint Scheduling Report. However, Plaintiff, despite numerous requests, failed to

  sign and return the Joint Scheduling Report to Defendant’s counsel so that the Report could be

  timely filed.

         4.       As the deadline to file the Report was approaching, in the abundance of caution,

  Defendants’ counsel electronically filed the Joint Scheduling Report during the evening of May

  19, 2011, without Plaintiff’s signature. (Docket number 29)

         5.       The following day the Plaintiff filed his own Joint Scheduling Report. (Docket

  number 30)

         6.       Subsequently, the Plaintiff then signed and filed the Joint Scheduling Report

  (Docket Number 31) originally agreed upon and filed by Defendants’ counsel on May 19, 2011.

         7.       While the Defendants do not agree with the commentary contained in the first

  three paragraphs of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Document from the Docket, Defendants

  concur with the statements contained in paragraph 4 of Plaintiff’s Motion, specifically that

  Defendants agree that Document 31, is the valid and correct Joint Scheduling Report, which is

  identical to the one filed by Defendants on May 19, 2011.

         8.       Accordingly, Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Document 30,

  which is the Joint Scheduling Report unilaterally filed by the Plaintiff.




                                                   2
Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35    Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 3 of 5


                                     CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON




                                      EISINGER, BROWN, LEWIS, FRANKEL,
                                      & CHAIET, P.A.
                                      Attorneys for Defendants
                                      4000 Hollywood Boulevard
                                      Suite 265-South
                                      Hollywood, FL 33021
                                      (954) 894-8000
                                      (954) 894-8015 Fax

                                      BY:   /S/ David S. Chaiet____________
                                            DAVID S. CHAIET, ESQUIRE
                                            FBN: 963798




                                        3
Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35           Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 4 of 5


                                           CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON



                                 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

         I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 25th day of May, 2011, I electronically filed the
  foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing
  document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the
  attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic
  Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties
  who are authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

                               __/s/ David S. Chaiet_______________
                               DAVID S. CHAIET, ESQUIRE
                               Florida Bar No. 963798




                                                4
Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35        Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 5 of 5


                                        CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON


                                     SERVICE LIST

                   Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc., et al.
                      Case No..: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON
                 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida


  Traian Bujduveanu
  Pro Se Plaintiff
  5601 W. Broward Blvd.
  Plantation, FL 33317

  Tel: (954) 316-3828
  Email: orionav@msn.com




                                             5

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch (9)

Doc 39
Doc 39Doc 39
Doc 39
 
Doc. 112
Doc. 112Doc. 112
Doc. 112
 
Doc.73
Doc.73Doc.73
Doc.73
 
Doc.64
Doc.64Doc.64
Doc.64
 
Doc 45
Doc 45Doc 45
Doc 45
 
Doc.93
Doc.93Doc.93
Doc.93
 
Doc.78
Doc.78Doc.78
Doc.78
 
Exhibit k
Exhibit kExhibit k
Exhibit k
 
Doc 31
Doc 31Doc 31
Doc 31
 

Ähnlich wie Doc.35

Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 

Ähnlich wie Doc.35 (20)

Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
 
Doc.39
Doc.39Doc.39
Doc.39
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
 
Doc.39
Doc.39Doc.39
Doc.39
 
Doc. 112
Doc. 112Doc. 112
Doc. 112
 
Doc. 112
Doc. 112Doc. 112
Doc. 112
 
Doc. 112
Doc. 112Doc. 112
Doc. 112
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Doc 37
Doc 37Doc 37
Doc 37
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Doc 37
Doc 37Doc 37
Doc 37
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Doc.67
Doc.67Doc.67
Doc.67
 
Doc.67
Doc.67Doc.67
Doc.67
 
Doc. 67
Doc. 67Doc. 67
Doc. 67
 

Mehr von Cocoselul Inaripat (20)

Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8
 
Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8
 
Spyology / vizualizare subiect agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
Spyology / vizualizare subiect   agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi ciaSpyology / vizualizare subiect   agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
Spyology / vizualizare subiect agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2
 
Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7
 
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 
Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7
 
Traian bujduveanu 6
Traian bujduveanu 6Traian bujduveanu 6
Traian bujduveanu 6
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 

Doc.35

  • 1. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU, Plaintiff, vs. DISMAS CHARITIES, INC., ANA GISPERT, DEREK THOMAS and ADAMS LESHOTA Defendants. _________________________________________/ DEFENDANTS DISMAS CHARTIES, INC., ANA GISPERT, DEREK THOMAS AND ADAMS LESHOTA’S BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DOCUMENT FROM THE DOCKET Defendants Dismas Charities, Inc., Ana Gispert, Derek Thomas and Adams Lashanda, incorrectly identified as Adams Leshota (collectively “Defendants”) by and through their undersigned counsel, file their Brief in Response to Plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Strike Documents from the Docket and alleges as follows: 1. Pursuant to Order of the Court, the parties were required to submit a Joint Scheduling Report on or before Friday May 20, 2011. 2. After substantial time, energy and effort by Defendants’ counsel, Defendants presented a proposed Joint Scheduling Report that followed the format recommended by the District Court. However, Plaintiff initially refused to accept this form. Plaintiff wanted to submit a Joint Scheduling Report having a section that basically contained an almost complete recitation of the Complaint.
  • 2. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 2 of 5 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON 3. After numerous conversations and email communications, Plaintiff agreed to the form of the Joint Scheduling Report. However, Plaintiff, despite numerous requests, failed to sign and return the Joint Scheduling Report to Defendant’s counsel so that the Report could be timely filed. 4. As the deadline to file the Report was approaching, in the abundance of caution, Defendants’ counsel electronically filed the Joint Scheduling Report during the evening of May 19, 2011, without Plaintiff’s signature. (Docket number 29) 5. The following day the Plaintiff filed his own Joint Scheduling Report. (Docket number 30) 6. Subsequently, the Plaintiff then signed and filed the Joint Scheduling Report (Docket Number 31) originally agreed upon and filed by Defendants’ counsel on May 19, 2011. 7. While the Defendants do not agree with the commentary contained in the first three paragraphs of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Document from the Docket, Defendants concur with the statements contained in paragraph 4 of Plaintiff’s Motion, specifically that Defendants agree that Document 31, is the valid and correct Joint Scheduling Report, which is identical to the one filed by Defendants on May 19, 2011. 8. Accordingly, Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Document 30, which is the Joint Scheduling Report unilaterally filed by the Plaintiff. 2
  • 3. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 3 of 5 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON EISINGER, BROWN, LEWIS, FRANKEL, & CHAIET, P.A. Attorneys for Defendants 4000 Hollywood Boulevard Suite 265-South Hollywood, FL 33021 (954) 894-8000 (954) 894-8015 Fax BY: /S/ David S. Chaiet____________ DAVID S. CHAIET, ESQUIRE FBN: 963798 3
  • 4. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 4 of 5 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 25th day of May, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. __/s/ David S. Chaiet_______________ DAVID S. CHAIET, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 963798 4
  • 5. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2011 Page 5 of 5 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON SERVICE LIST Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc., et al. Case No..: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Traian Bujduveanu Pro Se Plaintiff 5601 W. Broward Blvd. Plantation, FL 33317 Tel: (954) 316-3828 Email: orionav@msn.com 5