SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 6
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 1 of 6



                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
                           THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                          CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON

  TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU,

         Plaintiff,

  vs.

  DISMAS CHARITIES, INC., ANA GISPERT,
  DEREK THOMAS and ADAMS LESHOTA

        Defendants.
  _________________________________________/

                   DEFENDANTS RESPONSE BRIEF TO PLAINTIFF’S
                  MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
                   AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

         Defendants Dismas Charities, Inc., Ana Gispert, Derek Thomas and Lashanda Adams,

  incorrectly identified as Adams Leshota, (collectively “Defendants”) by and through their

  undersigned counsel, file their Response Brief to Plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu (“Plaintiff”)

  Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information as follows:

         1.      Plaintiff, a former Federal Inmate, filed a lawsuit against his residential reentry

  center, Dismas, and three of its employees, Gispert, Thomas, and Adams. The lawsuit arises

  from the Plaintiff’s own actions including his violations of a Bureau of Prison’s conditions for

  community corrections release prohibiting him from driving an automobile or possessing a cell

  phone. Upon being caught driving and possessing a cell phone, the Plaintiff transferred from

  Dismas back to a Federal Prison to complete the remaining 81 days of his Federal Prison

  sentence.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 2 of 6


                                            CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON

         2.     The Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel production of documents from third

  parties including CCM Miami, the United States Marshall Service, the Federal Bureau of

  Prisons, Washington, D.C., Federal Bureau of Prisons, Atlanta Regional Office, the Federal

  Detention Center Miami and the United States Probation Office.

         3.     The Plaintiff’s motion must be denied for a number of reasons.

         4.     First, the Court has ordered that no additional discovery is allowed. Judge Seitz

  entered an Order on March 16, 2012 specifically stating that “no additional discovery will be

  permitted.” (Docket 98, page 8 of 10.) Accordingly, the Plaintiff should not be attempting to

  obtain documents from third parties.

         5.     Second, the Plaintiff has no standing to file a motion to compel against the CCM

  Miami, the United States Marshall Service, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, D.C.,

  Federal Bureau of Prisons, Atlanta Regional Office, the Federal Detention Center Miami and the

  United States Probation Office. The Plaintiff never provided any subpoenas to Defendants or

  Defendants’ counsel. Defense counsel never saw or received any subpoenas prior to seeing

  them as attachments to Plaintiff’s motion on June 29, 2012.

         6.     Further, the Plaintiff has not provided any subpoenas or requests for production

  upon these third parties. Accordingly, these entities are not required to produce documents as

  they are not under any Court Order or subpoena to produce documents. The subpoenas attached

  as exhibits to Plaintiff’s motion to compel are of questionable value as they are dated June 20,

  2012 and request the production of documents on June 15, 2012. Absent a time machine, the

  third parties could not comply with a subpoena allegedly issued on June 20, 2012 requesting




                                                 2
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 3 of 6


                                             CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON

  production of documents five days earlier on June 15, 2012. Lastly, the Plaintiff has not

  provided proof that the third parties were even served with the subpoenas.

         7.      As the Plaintiff has not properly requested documents, pursuant to the Federal

  Rules of Civil Procedure, the CCM Miami, the United States Marshall Service, the Federal

  Bureau of Prisons, Washington, D.C., Federal Bureau of Prisons, Atlanta Regional Office, the

  Federal Detention Center Miami and the United States Probation Office are under no obligation

  to produce any documents to the Plaintiff. Stated differently, the Plaintiff cannot compel them to

  produce something they are not compelled to produce.

         8.      While the Motion is not directed to the Defendants, the Defendants take issue

  with Plaintiff’s statement that Defendants have not produced documents from the CCM Director

  Carlos Rodriquez, the Federal Bureau of Prisons or the Department of Justice, including

  documents regarding the Plaintiff’s return to prison following a Federal Bureau of Prisons

  hearing. These documents were not only produced but filed with the Court. Plaintiff only need

  look at Docket Number 83-2, pages 50-62. Apparently, Plaintiff, who signed many of the forms,

  is now claiming he was unaware of such proceedings; likely because the documents produced

  and filed by Defendant’s do not help his case.

                                          CONCLUSION

         For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants would move this Court for an Order

  denying Plaintiff’s Motion and any further relief the Court deems just and proper.

                                               Respectfully submitted,

                                               EISINGER, BROWN, LEWIS, FRANKEL,
                                               & CHAIET, P.A.
                                               Attorneys for Defendants
                                               4000 Hollywood Boulevard




                                                   3
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 4 of 6


                                    CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON

                                     Suite 265-South
                                     Hollywood, FL 33021
                                     (954) 894-8000
                                     (954) 894-8015 Fax

                                     BY:    /S/ David S. Chaiet____________
                                            DAVID S. CHAIET, ESQUIRE
                                            FBN: 963798




                                        4
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 5 of 6


                                           CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON


                                 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

         I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 5th day of July, 2012, I electronically filed the
  foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing
  document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the
  attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic
  Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties
  who are authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

                               __/s/ David S. Chaiet_______________
                               DAVID S. CHAIET, ESQUIRE
                               Florida Bar No. 963798




                                                5
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 6 of 6


                                        CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON

                                     SERVICE LIST

                   Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc., et al.
                      Case No..: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON
                 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida


  Traian Bujduveanu
  Pro Se Plaintiff
  5601 W. Broward Blvd.
  Plantation, FL 33317

  Tel: (954) 316-3828
  Email: orionav@msn.com




                                             6

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch (9)

Doc.73
Doc.73Doc.73
Doc.73
 
Doc 39
Doc 39Doc 39
Doc 39
 
Doc 45
Doc 45Doc 45
Doc 45
 
Doc.64
Doc.64Doc.64
Doc.64
 
Doc 31
Doc 31Doc 31
Doc 31
 
Doc.78
Doc.78Doc.78
Doc.78
 
Exhibit k
Exhibit kExhibit k
Exhibit k
 
Doc.93
Doc.93Doc.93
Doc.93
 
Doc.35
Doc.35Doc.35
Doc.35
 

Ähnlich wie Doc. 112

Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Cocoselul Inaripat
 

Ähnlich wie Doc. 112 (20)

Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charities,inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Doc. 57
Doc. 57Doc. 57
Doc. 57
 
Doc.67
Doc.67Doc.67
Doc.67
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...
 
Doc.39
Doc.39Doc.39
Doc.39
 
Doc 39
Doc 39Doc 39
Doc 39
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
 
Doc.39
Doc.39Doc.39
Doc.39
 
Pdf 11
Pdf 11Pdf 11
Pdf 11
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
 
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
 

Mehr von Cocoselul Inaripat (20)

Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8
 
Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8
 
Spyology / vizualizare subiect agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
Spyology / vizualizare subiect   agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi ciaSpyology / vizualizare subiect   agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
Spyology / vizualizare subiect agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2
 
Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7
 
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 
Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7
 
Traian bujduveanu 6
Traian bujduveanu 6Traian bujduveanu 6
Traian bujduveanu 6
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 

Doc. 112

  • 1. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU, Plaintiff, vs. DISMAS CHARITIES, INC., ANA GISPERT, DEREK THOMAS and ADAMS LESHOTA Defendants. _________________________________________/ DEFENDANTS RESPONSE BRIEF TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION Defendants Dismas Charities, Inc., Ana Gispert, Derek Thomas and Lashanda Adams, incorrectly identified as Adams Leshota, (collectively “Defendants”) by and through their undersigned counsel, file their Response Brief to Plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information as follows: 1. Plaintiff, a former Federal Inmate, filed a lawsuit against his residential reentry center, Dismas, and three of its employees, Gispert, Thomas, and Adams. The lawsuit arises from the Plaintiff’s own actions including his violations of a Bureau of Prison’s conditions for community corrections release prohibiting him from driving an automobile or possessing a cell phone. Upon being caught driving and possessing a cell phone, the Plaintiff transferred from Dismas back to a Federal Prison to complete the remaining 81 days of his Federal Prison sentence.
  • 2. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 2 of 6 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON 2. The Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel production of documents from third parties including CCM Miami, the United States Marshall Service, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, D.C., Federal Bureau of Prisons, Atlanta Regional Office, the Federal Detention Center Miami and the United States Probation Office. 3. The Plaintiff’s motion must be denied for a number of reasons. 4. First, the Court has ordered that no additional discovery is allowed. Judge Seitz entered an Order on March 16, 2012 specifically stating that “no additional discovery will be permitted.” (Docket 98, page 8 of 10.) Accordingly, the Plaintiff should not be attempting to obtain documents from third parties. 5. Second, the Plaintiff has no standing to file a motion to compel against the CCM Miami, the United States Marshall Service, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, D.C., Federal Bureau of Prisons, Atlanta Regional Office, the Federal Detention Center Miami and the United States Probation Office. The Plaintiff never provided any subpoenas to Defendants or Defendants’ counsel. Defense counsel never saw or received any subpoenas prior to seeing them as attachments to Plaintiff’s motion on June 29, 2012. 6. Further, the Plaintiff has not provided any subpoenas or requests for production upon these third parties. Accordingly, these entities are not required to produce documents as they are not under any Court Order or subpoena to produce documents. The subpoenas attached as exhibits to Plaintiff’s motion to compel are of questionable value as they are dated June 20, 2012 and request the production of documents on June 15, 2012. Absent a time machine, the third parties could not comply with a subpoena allegedly issued on June 20, 2012 requesting 2
  • 3. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 3 of 6 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON production of documents five days earlier on June 15, 2012. Lastly, the Plaintiff has not provided proof that the third parties were even served with the subpoenas. 7. As the Plaintiff has not properly requested documents, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the CCM Miami, the United States Marshall Service, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, D.C., Federal Bureau of Prisons, Atlanta Regional Office, the Federal Detention Center Miami and the United States Probation Office are under no obligation to produce any documents to the Plaintiff. Stated differently, the Plaintiff cannot compel them to produce something they are not compelled to produce. 8. While the Motion is not directed to the Defendants, the Defendants take issue with Plaintiff’s statement that Defendants have not produced documents from the CCM Director Carlos Rodriquez, the Federal Bureau of Prisons or the Department of Justice, including documents regarding the Plaintiff’s return to prison following a Federal Bureau of Prisons hearing. These documents were not only produced but filed with the Court. Plaintiff only need look at Docket Number 83-2, pages 50-62. Apparently, Plaintiff, who signed many of the forms, is now claiming he was unaware of such proceedings; likely because the documents produced and filed by Defendant’s do not help his case. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants would move this Court for an Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion and any further relief the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, EISINGER, BROWN, LEWIS, FRANKEL, & CHAIET, P.A. Attorneys for Defendants 4000 Hollywood Boulevard 3
  • 4. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 4 of 6 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON Suite 265-South Hollywood, FL 33021 (954) 894-8000 (954) 894-8015 Fax BY: /S/ David S. Chaiet____________ DAVID S. CHAIET, ESQUIRE FBN: 963798 4
  • 5. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 5 of 6 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 5th day of July, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. __/s/ David S. Chaiet_______________ DAVID S. CHAIET, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 963798 5
  • 6. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 6 of 6 CASE NO.: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON SERVICE LIST Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc., et al. Case No..: 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Traian Bujduveanu Pro Se Plaintiff 5601 W. Broward Blvd. Plantation, FL 33317 Tel: (954) 316-3828 Email: orionav@msn.com 6