1. A Presentation by Zainab Zahra
2 nd Year MBBS
Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan
Medical And Dental College Lahore.
2. The effect of peer feedback on small
group learning in case scenario
based tutorials
Participants: A group of 25 first year
medical students
3. What is peer feedback?
• It is an important tool in promoting learning.
Its goal is to improve the performance of the
receiver by closing the gap between current
performance of a student and a more positive
and desired state ( Archer 2010).
4. What are Case Scenario Based
Tutorials
• Case scenario based tutorials unlike
“conventional” tutorials, in which questioning
of the students on the given subject occurs,
involves solving actual clinical scenarios in a
given amount of time. This not only makes the
student’s theoretical knowledge stronger but
allows them to apply their knowledge in a
clinical setting while greatly enhancing their
critical learning.
5. METHODLOLGY
• It is a six week study in which the participants
meet each week for their 2-hour physiology
tutorial.
• In the first two weeks we gave them training
sessions on how to give the feedback and its
significance
• In the third week we conducted the pre test (
their first feedback).
6. • In the next two weeks the students reflected
on their received feedback and set their goals
for improvement.
• They were taught non verbal communication
and different motivational and collaborative
exercises were conducted.
• In the sixth week the post test ( their second
feedback) will be conducted followed by a
questionnaire about the peer feedback and
focus group.
7. Group: 1 2 3 4 5
Completely Disagree neutral Agree Completely
Evaluator disagree agree
Name:
Student IDnumber:
3. This student asked critical questions OOOOO
Student to be evaluated 4 . This student corrected misconceptions OOOOO
Name: about the subject matter
5. This student contributed to a better OOOOO
Student IDnumber:
understanding of the subject matter
6. This student had a positive influence on OOOOO
Explanation: the group
With this rating scale the performance of your fellow student in the 7. This student felt responsible for the group OOOOO
tutorial group can be evaluated. For each fellow student a separate 8. This student promoted collaboration OOOOO
rating scale has to be filled in. The name of the person you have to between group members
evaluate is written above. With regard to the results, no feedback will 9. This student was willing to share his/her OOOOO
be given to the student you are going to evaluate. Instead they will be information
analyzed anonymously. When an item does not apply you can skip 10. This student was committed to the group OOOOO
it.Thank you beforehand for your cooperation. 11. This student demonstrated motivation OOOOO
12. This student participated well OOOOO
13. This student actively participated during OOOOO
the brainstorm sessions
1 2 3 4 5 14. This student contributed more than other OOOOO
Completely Disagree neutral Agree Completely group members
disagree agree
1. This student was able to make adequate OOOOO
Summaries
2. This student was able to make a OOOOO
distinction between the main and lateral
issues in the subject matter
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14. Why conduct Peer Feedback?
• It provides the students with an unbiased
reflection of their role in their group.
• Allows each student to reflect and improve the
quality of their contribution towards the group.
•It improves group functioning while improving the
overall learning of the group.
•It provides a way for students to themselves
improve their individual contributions and tutorial
learning.
