O documento discute os benefícios do uso de mainframes versus ambientes distribuídos, incluindo reduções significativas nos custos totais de propriedade de até 55%. Estudos mostram que o mainframe oferece o menor custo por unidade de trabalho e simplificação operacional em comparação com configurações distribuídas complexas.
18. MAINFRAMES FATOS E xistem 10.000 mainframes em operação no mundo inteiro, com uma capacidade instalada de mais de 15 milhões de MIPS. Para se ter uma comparação em 2000 haviam 3,5 milhões de MIPS instalados e cerca de 9 milhões em fins de 2005. Entre os anos de 2005 a 2007, mais de 2 milhões de MIPS foram instalados ! multiplicou-se por mais de três a base instalada de MIPS em apenas 7 anos ... 2 razões para este crescimento; 1 . Compatibilidade dos novos sistemas com o software legado. Existem cerca de 200 bilhões de linhas de código Cobol em uso hoje e cerca de cinco bilhões são adicionadas à esta base a cada ano! 2 . Novas cargas rodando em mainframe Linux (Java, PHP, OpenSource aps)
19. 500 Intel Nehalem Servers (8 cores each, non-virtualized) 228 Intel Nehalem Servers using VMware (8 cores each) 875 Intel Xeon Servers using VMware (8 cores each) 1,603 servers 10,000 workloads Quanto custaria colocar 10,000 Workloads em plataforma Intel ( VMWARE) IBM analysis of a customer scenario with 10,000 distributed workloads. Deployment configuration is based on consolidation ratios derived from IBM internal studies. 500 heavy workloads 2,500 heavy I/O Workloads 7,000 light workloads
20. 1,603 Intel 21 Frames 445 blades 334 IFLs 56% less $314M TCA (3 anos) $138M TCA (3 years) Best fit on zEnterprise Comparando apenas o custo de aquisição 500 heavy workloads 2,500 heavy I/O Workloads 7,000 light workloads
21. 95% less 13,763 total network parts $3.8M TCA Additional network parts 223 total network parts $197K TCA 7 switches 142 cables 74 adapters Additional network parts 313 switches 7,038 cables 6,412 adapters Compare Network Cost Of Acquisition Best fit on zEnterprise As deployed on Intel Network configuration is based on IBM internal studies. Prices are in US currency, prices will vary by country. 500 heavy workloads 2,500 heavy I/O Workloads 7,000 light workloads
22. 80% less 1,603 Servers 2,131 kW $5.6M 3 years @ $0.10 per kWh 21 frames 419 kW $1.1M 3 years @ $0.10 per kWh Comparando Consumo de energia Best fit on zEnterprise Server configuration based on IBM internal studies. Calculations for Intel servers based on published power ratings and industry standard rates. Prices are in US currency, prices will vary by country. As deployed on Intel 500 heavy workloads 2,500 heavy I/O Workloads 7,000 light workloads
23. 62% less 411,296 labor hours/yr 198 administrators $94.8M 3 years @ $159,600/yr 156,606 labor hours/yr 76 administrators $36.4M 3 years @ $159,600/yr Comparando custos de Pessoal Configuration based on IBM internal studies. Labor model based on customer provided data from IBM studies Labor rates will vary by country Best fit on zEnterprise As deployed on Intel 500 heavy workloads 2,500 heavy I/O Workloads 7,000 light workloads
24. 49% less 7.7 PB embedded storage 31% utilization 1,603 points of admin 4.5 PB provisioned storage 53% utilization 10 points of admin $211M TCO (3 years) $108M TCO (3 years) 240GB active storage required per workload (2.4PB total) 1 SONAS 6 XIV via SAN 3 DS8700 Comparando custos de Storage Storage configuration is based on IBM internal studies. Prices are in US currency, prices will vary by country. Best fit on zEnterprise As deployed on Intel 500 heavy workloads 2,500 heavy I/O Workloads 7,000 light workloads
25. Simplificação : Menos partes para montar e gerenciar Best fit on zEnterprise As deployed on Intel 1,603 Servers 21 frames 13,763 Network (parts) 223 2,131 Power (kW) 419 198 Administrators 76 1,603 Storage admin points 10 500 heavy workloads 2,500 heavy I/O Workloads 7,000 light workloads
26. A economia é cumulativa 55% MENOS Results may vary based on customer workload profiles/characteristics. Prices based on publicly available US list prices. Prices may vary by country Three Year Cost of … Deploy on Intel Best fit on zEnterprise Servers $ 314M $ 138M Network $ 3.8M $ 0.2M Power $ 5.6M $ 1.1M Labor $ 94.8M $ 36.4M Storage $ 211M $ 108M Total $ 629M $ 284M Total cost per workload $ 63K $ 28K 500 heavy workloads 2,500 heavy I/O Workloads 7,000 light workloads
27.
28.
29. Concurso Mainframe 2010: 4.000 estudantes ( rank-4 WW ) Mais de 11.000 estudantes nas 4 edicoes ( 2007-2010 ) + de 1500 estudantes treinados em mainframe em 2010, nas diversas parcerias que temos ( SP utiliza a infra de Hortolandia / Unicamp ) 2.250 clientes treinados no programa zFuture (19 turmas em 2010) 51 professores treinados em 2010 em 14 estados do Brasil TARGET 2011 300 professores. System z Mastery Test: GRÁTIS até dezembro de 2011 Comunidade
30. Como saber qual infraestrutura de TI é mais adequada em termos de custos ? Há mais de 20 anos os conceitos de TCO (Total Cost of OwnerShip), foram apresentados ao mercado por Bill Kirwin do Gartner Group, como um meio de entender de forma clara e racional os custos reais da infra-estrutura de TI relacionadas ao negócio. Nas palavras de seu criador: TCO é uma maneira holística de avaliar os custos de TI ao longo do tempo. Vamos analisar um exemplo ... O que é TCO e quando usar ?
31.
32.
33. Objetivo do estudo Ajudar nossos clientes a esclarecer de forma clara e racional os custos reais da infra-estrutura de TI relacionadas ao negócio num período de 5 anos.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Hinweis der Redaktion
This might be a typical deployed environment. What did the customer spend to deploy these workloads? 8 light workloads to each Xeon (older) Intel server with VMware 1 heavy workload to each (newer) Hehalem Intel server 11 heavy I/O workloads to each (newer) Nehalem Intel server
Best Fit Deployment All Intel Blades Xeon+Nehalem All p7 Blades All on the CEC $ 131,586,500 $ 210,577,500 $ 314,639,000 $ 145,812,000 $ 193,399,500 Based on currently available pricing info
Power savings (including DC option)?? Cooling savings (including chilled water option)??
Storage for the heavy I/O workloads allocated on DS8700 to take advantage of storage cache and controllers high bandwidth Storage for other workloads allocated to a mix of SONAS for filers and XIV for block storage. XIVs are connected via a SAN. Storage labor savings???
Consider the cost of assembling thousands of parts in the Intel case. Much fewer parts in zEnterprise which is already integrated.
This compares what the customer spent and is spending to run the Intel environment to what the customer could spend to run the same workloads on zEnterprise.
Steve Mills 07/22/10 100722 MILLS zLaunch NYC.ppt
Main message – This is a systems discussion to simplify and drive down costs in the data center Discuss with data center manager, CIO, or CFO zEnterprise can consolidate the broadest set of workloads The platform with the ability to do that will be the lowest cost platform Lowest processor acquisition costs Simplified networks Lowest labor costs Lowest power consumption IBM can also deliver similar cost savings with fit for purpose storage Lowest storage costs zEnterprise enables you to go after workloads previously untouchable Any distributed workload, not just hybrids Achieve better qualities of service No competitor can match it Push Sun, HP, and Dell out of the data center