1. Our Mob An system for appropriate social networking in the Indigenous Community PhD Candidate: Chris RauchleSupervisor: Dr Steve Cassidy MCDC10 Friday, 11 June 2010 URL: http://sites.google.com/site/crauchlethesis/documents/Seminar_2010%5B2%5D.pptx?attredirects=0&d=1

2. Coming up Current modes of media use in Indigenous Communities Requirements related to media use in the Indigenous Community Ideas on how to support these requirements using technology My project plan for a system to test these ideas

3. Existing communications Voice - a lot of issues with phone plans SMS - affinity with indigenous expression PANs (Bluetooth, DVD, VHS, filesharing) Email - free hotmail You Tube Paper from IngeKral at CAEPR @ ANU

4. Indigenous IT – Krall’s example SMSs

5. Indigenous IT – Public computer use

6. Indigenous IT – Making music

7. Facebook - the awful truth Requires Literacy Requires expensive equipment Requires a data plan (broadband or mobile) Requires a private area (most equipment public) Does not have Rights Management over individual pieces of media Does not have Asset Management - can’t find media by a searching or protect it by local backup Unsupported by current network infrastructure – may be no network so idea of being always connected doesn’t work

8. Rights Management for: Class and Gender restrictions Location +Temporality Secret/Sacred Mortuary restrictions Bullying Privacy Intend to extend social norms into the IT system that currently doesn’t support them…not replace ‘good manners’ with a machine

9. Class and Gender Men’s business Women’s business Lawman’s business Questions on these issues may result in silence or misdirection as discussion of them is impolite/rude/forbidden

10. Location Geotagging- some things may only be discussed in/out of Country or a region Indigenous Spirituality believes People continue to inhabit Country after they have been there Remote experience of country Augmented reality experience of country BingMapslive mashups of 3D Google/Bing Maps Earth/Sky overlays of historical Country

11. Temporality Media may need embargo or to expire after a certain date Other restrictions may be relaxable after a period of time - non Indigenous equivalents: official secrets act, declassification Copyright may never be allowed (NI = 75 years) Some secrets must never be divulged

12. Mortuary restrictions No media showing a person for a period after they die No speaking the name of a person who has died No display of objects related to person/event No group talk about death of a person (subject demands a one on one conversation) Selective removal/pixelation of person

13. Jock McKeon

14. Bullying Small connected communities mean that existing facebook style ‘defriend’ is irrelevant/inappropriate Cyberbullyingneeds moderation Frictionless nature of social media Betrayal of trust, what can you do to expire your own media if it falls into the wrong hands?

15. 3rd party betrayal of trust

16. 3rd party betrayal of trust

17. 3rd party betrayal of trust

18. 3rd party betrayal of trust

19. 3rd party betrayal of trust

20. 3rd party betrayal of trust

21. 3rd party betrayal of trust

22. How do we accomplish this? MPEG1, 2 and 4 are file standards for audio/video MPEG 7 is an annotation standard producing information about content and describing the creation of the media MPEG 21 is a mechanism to enforce viewer control, monetisation and location/temporal restrictions on media expression

23. Asset Management A prototype using these technologies will test whether media protection is enforceable Personal ownership of data - PANs, Bonjour Retaining rights in the file - MXF Encryption Long life storage

24. Product Breakdown

25. Future Research Customer base seems to exist Requires easy to administer rights management Personal storage under personal control Next Steps - is this something that should be prototyped with a community?

26. References Chose what happens next, American Ad Council, USA 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGkaw44-Ql4&playnext_from=TL&videos=cXdpSokXRy4 The Manahattana Project http://themannahattaproject.org/explore/mannahatta-map/ Deger, Jennifer, Shimmering Screens: Making Media in an Aboriginal Community, University of Minnesota Press, USA, 2006 Kral, Inge, Plugged in: Remote Australian Indigenous youth and Digital Culture, CAEPR WORKING PAPER No. 69/2010, http://www.anu.edu.au/caepr/Publications/WP/2010WP69.php Benchmark policies: Kinship Placements, http://www.kidsguardian.nsw.gov.au/accreditation/benchmark-policies/Section%201.5b Michaels, Eric, Bad Aboriginal Art: Tradition, Media and Technological Horizons, University of Minnesota Press, USA, 1994 Norris, Ray, Aboriginal Astronomy, CSIRO, 2007, http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/AboriginalAstronomy/index.html