SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 6
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION ON RESEARCH THEMES IN FP7

DG Research, European Commission, 16 March 2005

1.

INTRODUCTION

An open consultation was undertaken by the Commission during November and December 2004 to
allow interested individuals and organisations to submit contributions regarding thematic domains
for transnational collaborative research to be supported in the 7 th Framework Programme for
research and technological development. This consultation followed a more general consultation on
the Commission’s guidelines for future EU policy to support research1 and complemented a number
of more specific consultations on thematic domains in fields such as Information and
Communication Technologies, Social Science and Humanities, Foresight and Nanotechnology.2
Over 1800 contributions were received and this note provides some information about the types and
level of response. The contents of the contributions are being used to help prepare the
Commission’s proposals for the 7th Framework Programme. In many cases the detailed nature of the
contributions means that they will be considered in the preparation of the proposals for the Specific
Programmes under the 7th Framework Programme.

2.

TYPES OF RESPONSES

A total of 1824 contributions were received 3 of which approximately half came from individuals
and half from organisations. The highest number of organisational responses came from
associations, closely followed by universities/higher education and then research institutes. The
highest number of individual responses came from universities/higher education. Around 10 percent
of organisational responses came from commercial bodies and from government bodies.
Type of organisation:
Governmental body
University/higher education
Commercial (more than 250 employees)
Commercial (less than 250 employees)
Research institute
Association
Other
Total

All responses
Number
Percentage
163
8,9%
618
33,9%
65
3,6%
49
2,7%
403
22,1%
311
17,1%
215
11,8%
1824
100,0%

1

Of which organisational
responses
Number
Percentage
98
10,6%
234
25,4%
51
5,5%
43
4,7%
182
19,7%
246
26,7%
68
7,4%
922
100,0%

A report on the results is available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/index_en.cfm
Links to these consultations are available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/themes/index_en.cfm
3
This total excludes duplicate responses.
2

1
Contributions came from a wide spread of countries, including all EU Member States except
Luxembourg. The highest numbers came from the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, France and
Spain. Collectively, over 100 responses (6.4 % of the total) came from the 10 new Member States.

Country of response
AT – Austria
BE – Belgium
CY – Cyprus
CZ - Czech Republic
DE – Germany
DK – Denmark
EE – Estonia
EL – Greece
ES – Spain
FI – Finland
FR – France
HU – Hungary
IE – Ireland
IT – Italy
LT – Lithuania
LU - Luxembourg
LV – Látvia

Number
41
85
4
6
239
33
15
33
151
65
154
9
22
97
22
0
4

Percentage
2,2%
4,7%
0,2%
0,3%
13,1%
1,8%
0,8%
1,8%
8,3%
3,6%
8,4%
0,5%
1,2%
5,3%
1,2%
0,0%
0,2%

Country of response
MT – Malta
NL – Netherlands
PL – Poland
PT – Portugal
SK - Slovak Republic
SL – Slovenia
SV – Sweden
UK - United Kingdom
BG – Bulgaria
CH – Switzerland
IL – Israel
IS – Iceland
NO – Norway
RO – Romania
TR – Turkey
Other country
International organisation
TOTAL

3.

Number
10
209
35
44
4
8
72
276
6
28
13
0
37
3
11
22
66
1824

Percentage
0,5%
11,5%
1,9%
2,4%
0,2%
0,4%
3,9%
15,1%
0,3%
1,5%
0,7%
0,0%
2,0%
0,2%
0,6%
1,2%
3,6%
100,0%

RESEARCH AREAS WHICH CONTRIBUTIONS RELATE TO.

Participants were asked to indicate which area(s) of research in the 6th Framework Programme their
contribution related to. A significant number of contributions related to each of the areas under the
6th Framework Programme as well as to security research. The highest number related to global
change and ecosystems and to combating major diseases, and a large number to food quality and
safety, to advanced genomics and its applications to health and to sustainable energy systems. It
should be pointed out that the number of contributions received is not considered to be an indicator
of the relevant importance of the thematic priorities, given that this depends on the justification of
topics proposed against the three defined criteria and also that respondents to the consultation were
“self selecting”.
Most of the topics suggested by participants fit within the scope of the thematic priorities of the 6 th
Framework Programme, although in some cases they relate to specific topics which are not covered
by the work programmes. Many of the contributions therefore contained topics which were
indicated to be “not covered in the 6th Framework Programme”. In addition, for a significant
number of such responses the topics of “marine research” or “complementary and alternative
medicine” were proposed, and some of these responses may have been the result of a coordinated
campaign.

2
Area(s) of research under the 6 th Framework Programme to
which contributions relate to:
Advanced genomics and its applications to health
Combating major diseases
Information society technologies
Nanotechnologies and nanosciences, knowledge based
multifunctional materials and new production
Aeronautics
Space
Food quality and safety
Sustainable energy systems
Nuclear fusion and/or fission
Sustainable surface transport
Global change and ecosystems
Citizens and governance in a knowledge based society
Research to support policy
Security (not covered in the 6th Framework Programme)
Other areas not covered in the 6th Framework Programme

4.

256
590
187

% of responses
indicating the area
14,0%
32,3%
10,3%

138
63
66
272
216
54
134
755
130
338
102
843

7,6%
3,5%
3,6%
14,9%
11,8%
3,0%
7,3%
41,4%
7,1%
18,5%
5,6%
46,2%

Number

CONCLUSIONS

The Commission is using the results of this consultation in the preparation of its proposal for the 7th
Framework Programme. For this exercise, the contributions from this consultation are considered
along side the views expressed by European Institutions, other written contributions and position
papers submitted to the Commission, as well as the outcomes of other relevant consultations,
workshops and events relating to specific fields of research.
The results suggest that the thematic priorities of the 6th Framework Programme, together with the
new areas of Space and Security, cover the vast majority of the topics which stakeholders would
like to see supported in the 7th Framework Programme, although in many cases a wider range of
topics would need to be supported under each priority. In addition, many of the contributions relate
to topics which are of a too detailed nature for the Framework Programme proposal, and so will be
considered in the context of preparing the proposals for the Specific Programmes.

3
ANNEX: TEXT FROM WEBSITE AND COMMENTS FORM.
Introduction
The European Commission is undertaking a process to identify thematic domains for future
European support under the 7th Framework Programme. It is essential to identify those domains
where support at European level is most needed and will have the greatest impact, as set out in the
Communication Science and Technology, the key to Europe’s future – Guidelines for future
European Union policy to support research. This concerns support where thematic domains will be
predetermined at the start of the Framework Programmes. This is particularly important for future
support to transnational collaborative research.
The thematic domains to be identified will cover an area of research in which a range of research
projects and networks should be supported in the medium term and allow sufficient flexibility to
take into account scientific, industrial and policy developments during the period of the 7th
Framework Programme. The Commission wishes to identify thematic domains which should
continue from the Sixth Framework Programme as well as new and emerging ones
(including those in the two new areas of space and security which are described in the Commission
Communication). A full list of thematic domains under the current priorities can be found in the
Annex I to the Decisions on the Sixth Framework of the European Commission and of Euratom.
The Commission will present a list of thematic domains for future European Union support to
research when it presents the proposal for the 7th Framework Programme, due in 2005.
Criteria to identify thematic domains
The Commission is using the following three criteria in order to identify which thematic domains will
be included in the proposal for the 7th Framework Programme.
1. Contribution to EU policy objectives
The research in the thematic domain must generate new knowledge to meet societal needs and
catalyse the delivery of a European policy objective(s), including the objective to transform
Europe into a dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy, capable of sustainable
economic growth. Relevant policy objectives include those in the areas of health, consumer
protection, energy, the environment, development aid, agriculture and fisheries, biotechnology,
information and communication technologies, transport, education and training, employment, social
affairs, economic cohesion, justice and home affairs. The thematic domain may be one of current
importance or likely to become important in the medium to long term.
To be assessed through: research needs stemming from EU Treaties and policy commitments;
analysis of market prospects and competitive position of EU industries; future needs identified in
Foresight and similar exercises; views from the research community and industry.
2. European research potential
The thematic domain must be one where there is a strong potential for excellent research and
technological development and for disseminating and converting the results into social
and economic benefits. For example future support should, wherever possible, build on past and
current investments and successes in relevant areas of research and its application.
To be assessed through: analysis of past investments, experience and successes in the Framework
Programme; international comparisons of European research performance; views from the research
community and industry.
3. European added value
There must be a strong need for additional public funding and for such intervention to be at a
European level.

•

Additional public funding to be justified by the externalities and wider benefits from the
research and by the need to attract increased public and private investments.

4
•

European level intervention to be justified by the need for European centres of
excellence through collaborative research: to create the necessary multi-disciplinarity
and critical mass of scale and scope; to overcome fragmentation and unnecessary
duplication, lack of connections and of interoperability; to complement other
intergovernmental, national and private actions; to address shared or European
level problems; or to enhance visibility of European research excellence.

To be assessed through: analysis of levels and impact of current public support available in the
Europe Union and its Member States and in comparison with other countries; views from the
research community and industry.
How to contribute to the debate
The Commission welcomes contributions to the debate on identifying future thematic domains from
the research community and users of research, including: research organisations and associations;
industrial and sector associations; individual universities, enterprises and research institutes; and
all individuals and groups with an interest in research.
Contributions can be made in two ways:

•

A range of activities, fora, and documents are available which relate to the identification of
future European research priorities in defined thematic areas of research. Interested
parties are invited to make their contributions through these fora. (See sidebar for
links to relevant fora.)These thematic activities follow on from the general consultation on
the guidelines for future European Union policy to support research which was undertaken
from July to October 2004.

•

For organisations and individuals who wish to make a contribution in addition to any
contribution to the general consultation or which does not relate to the existing thematic
fora or is a consolidated contribution across a number of thematic areas, the comments
form can be used to send contributions.

Please note that the Commission is not seeking views on detailed research topics for calls for
proposals. Consolidated contributions that represent the views of a number of institutions and/or
individuals would be particularly welcome.
The Commission will ensure that all contributions received are transmitted to the competent
persons within the Commission to inform the analysis of thematic domains to be included in the 7th
Framework Programme proposal.
To ensure that they can be properly included in the analysis, the Commission would
welcome contributions as early as possible and by no later than the end of the 2004.
A report on the contributions received will be made available in due course at:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/index_en.html

5
Comments Form
What will happen to the data you submit? Read our Specific Privacy Statement
[http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/sps-eform_en.html]
*Are you responding on a personal basis

or on behalf of your organisation

*Name of your organisation (write “none” if you have no affiliation)
Department:
Position:
*Type of organisation: [governmental body; university/higher education; commercial organisation
(more than 250 employees); commercial organisation (less than 250 employees); association (e.g.
trade association, research association, civil society organisation); other]
*Contact name:
*Contact email:
*Country (EU countries listed first):
[AT – Austria; BE – Belgium; CY – Cyprus; CZ - Czech
Republic; DE – Germany; DK – Denmark; EE – Estonia; EL – Greece;ES – Spain; FI – Finland; FR –
France; HU – Hungary; E – Ireland; IT – Italy; LT – Lithuania; LU - Luxembourg ;LV – Látvia; MT –
Malta; NL – Netherlands; PL – Poland; PT – Portugal; SK - Slovak Republic; SL – Slovenia; SV –
Sweden; UK - United Kingdom; BG – Bulgaria; CH – Switzerland; IL – Israel ;IS – Iceland; NO –
Norway; RO – Romania; TR – Turkey; Other country; International organisation]

*Area(s) of research from the 6th Framework Programme that your contribution relates to:
Advanced genomics and its applications to health
Combating major diseases
Information society technologies
Nanotechnologies and nanosciences, knowledge based multifunctional materials, new production
Aeronautics
Space
Food quality and safety
Sustainable energy systems
Nuclear fusion, nuclear fission and radiation protection
Sustainable surface transport
Global change and ecosystems
Citizens and governance in a knowledge based society
Research to support policy
Science and society
Security (not covered in the 6th Framework Programme)
Other areas not covered in the 6th Framework Programme
Please specify

*Please attach your contribution here (plain text, MS-WORD, RTF, WordPerfect PDF formats; only
one attachment):
Documents should be no longer than 5 pages and should provide a short description of the thematic
domain and relevant information to support the thematic domain using the three criteria. Longer
documents are appropriate for consolidated contributions that cover a number of different thematic
domains.
Any additional comments:

6

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Isaxan teqdimat xezer 14 fevral
Isaxan teqdimat xezer 14 fevralIsaxan teqdimat xezer 14 fevral
Isaxan teqdimat xezer 14 fevralIlkAddimlar
 
Ap05 phys objectives_45859-1
Ap05 phys objectives_45859-1Ap05 phys objectives_45859-1
Ap05 phys objectives_45859-1Steph Cliche
 
Jadwal remed-urut-dosen
Jadwal remed-urut-dosenJadwal remed-urut-dosen
Jadwal remed-urut-dosendailyconcerts
 
13. la redención
13. la redención13. la redención
13. la redenciónA L
 
Oficio n° 011 2012
Oficio n° 011 2012Oficio n° 011 2012
Oficio n° 011 2012rubencoa
 
4906604 banking-project
4906604 banking-project4906604 banking-project
4906604 banking-projectGurpreet Brar
 
2. comienza el ministerio
2. comienza el ministerio2. comienza el ministerio
2. comienza el ministerioA L
 
tutorial de insertar un video a powerpoint
tutorial de insertar un video a powerpointtutorial de insertar un video a powerpoint
tutorial de insertar un video a powerpointArturo Hernandez
 
1530korterink 101107225906-phpapp02
1530korterink 101107225906-phpapp021530korterink 101107225906-phpapp02
1530korterink 101107225906-phpapp02Steph Cliche
 
Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security th...
Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security th...Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security th...
Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security th...Steph Cliche
 
I si technicalleaflet
I si technicalleafletI si technicalleaflet
I si technicalleafletSteph Cliche
 
2. crisis en el edén
2. crisis en el edén2. crisis en el edén
2. crisis en el edénA L
 
2009 10-28-peeking-into-pandoras-bochs red-team-pentesting
2009 10-28-peeking-into-pandoras-bochs red-team-pentesting2009 10-28-peeking-into-pandoras-bochs red-team-pentesting
2009 10-28-peeking-into-pandoras-bochs red-team-pentestingSteph Cliche
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

085 n008
085 n008085 n008
085 n008
 
Isaxan teqdimat xezer 14 fevral
Isaxan teqdimat xezer 14 fevralIsaxan teqdimat xezer 14 fevral
Isaxan teqdimat xezer 14 fevral
 
Ap05 phys objectives_45859-1
Ap05 phys objectives_45859-1Ap05 phys objectives_45859-1
Ap05 phys objectives_45859-1
 
Jadwal remed-urut-dosen
Jadwal remed-urut-dosenJadwal remed-urut-dosen
Jadwal remed-urut-dosen
 
Jadwal pend mat
Jadwal pend matJadwal pend mat
Jadwal pend mat
 
13. la redención
13. la redención13. la redención
13. la redención
 
Soomma.com
Soomma.comSoomma.com
Soomma.com
 
Oficio n° 011 2012
Oficio n° 011 2012Oficio n° 011 2012
Oficio n° 011 2012
 
4906604 banking-project
4906604 banking-project4906604 banking-project
4906604 banking-project
 
2. comienza el ministerio
2. comienza el ministerio2. comienza el ministerio
2. comienza el ministerio
 
tutorial de insertar un video a powerpoint
tutorial de insertar un video a powerpointtutorial de insertar un video a powerpoint
tutorial de insertar un video a powerpoint
 
1530korterink 101107225906-phpapp02
1530korterink 101107225906-phpapp021530korterink 101107225906-phpapp02
1530korterink 101107225906-phpapp02
 
6709
67096709
6709
 
Motoa
MotoaMotoa
Motoa
 
Public wifi
Public wifiPublic wifi
Public wifi
 
Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security th...
Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security th...Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security th...
Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security th...
 
Ct-1055 5 band handheld jammer user manual by http://www.jammers4u.com
Ct-1055 5 band handheld jammer user manual by http://www.jammers4u.comCt-1055 5 band handheld jammer user manual by http://www.jammers4u.com
Ct-1055 5 band handheld jammer user manual by http://www.jammers4u.com
 
I si technicalleaflet
I si technicalleafletI si technicalleaflet
I si technicalleaflet
 
2. crisis en el edén
2. crisis en el edén2. crisis en el edén
2. crisis en el edén
 
2009 10-28-peeking-into-pandoras-bochs red-team-pentesting
2009 10-28-peeking-into-pandoras-bochs red-team-pentesting2009 10-28-peeking-into-pandoras-bochs red-team-pentesting
2009 10-28-peeking-into-pandoras-bochs red-team-pentesting
 

Ähnlich wie Fp7themesconsultation en

Partnership as the driver of R&D and innovation
Partnership as the driver of R&D and innovationPartnership as the driver of R&D and innovation
Partnership as the driver of R&D and innovationSteve Rogers
 
2008 Key Figures Report Comision 2008 2009 En
2008  Key Figures Report Comision 2008 2009 En2008  Key Figures Report Comision 2008 2009 En
2008 Key Figures Report Comision 2008 2009 EnMadrid Network
 
cooperation_final
cooperation_finalcooperation_final
cooperation_finalViola Peter
 
Scientific information literacy and European Open Access policies
Scientific information literacy and European Open Access policiesScientific information literacy and European Open Access policies
Scientific information literacy and European Open Access policiesInformAll
 
Graham Hughes - Beta Technology - FP 7 Call Presentation
Graham Hughes - Beta Technology - FP 7 Call PresentationGraham Hughes - Beta Technology - FP 7 Call Presentation
Graham Hughes - Beta Technology - FP 7 Call PresentationCK Group
 
Horizon 2020 - Oportunidades entre UE y LAC. Octubre 2017
Horizon 2020 - Oportunidades entre UE y LAC. Octubre 2017Horizon 2020 - Oportunidades entre UE y LAC. Octubre 2017
Horizon 2020 - Oportunidades entre UE y LAC. Octubre 2017Elan Network
 
2018 burgelman tsoukala athens may 31_final
2018 burgelman tsoukala athens may 31_final2018 burgelman tsoukala athens may 31_final
2018 burgelman tsoukala athens may 31_finalVictoria Tsoukala
 
Informe final: "Mapeo y análisis de las tecnologías posibles para el aprendiz...
Informe final: "Mapeo y análisis de las tecnologías posibles para el aprendiz...Informe final: "Mapeo y análisis de las tecnologías posibles para el aprendiz...
Informe final: "Mapeo y análisis de las tecnologías posibles para el aprendiz...Juan Jesús Baño Egea
 
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU. Agenda 2016
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU. Agenda 2016Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU. Agenda 2016
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU. Agenda 2016eraser Juan José Calderón
 
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU, Agenda 2016.
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU, Agenda 2016.Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU, Agenda 2016.
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU, Agenda 2016.xrbiotech
 
FISTERA - a personal view
FISTERA - a personal viewFISTERA - a personal view
FISTERA - a personal viewIan Miles
 
Pcp final-ramboll-report-js2 en
Pcp final-ramboll-report-js2 enPcp final-ramboll-report-js2 en
Pcp final-ramboll-report-js2 enDr Lendy Spires
 
International collaboration in a research institute: a bibliometric study
International collaboration in a research institute: a bibliometric studyInternational collaboration in a research institute: a bibliometric study
International collaboration in a research institute: a bibliometric studyIAALD Community
 

Ähnlich wie Fp7themesconsultation en (20)

Partnership as the driver of R&D and innovation
Partnership as the driver of R&D and innovationPartnership as the driver of R&D and innovation
Partnership as the driver of R&D and innovation
 
2008 Key Figures Report Comision 2008 2009 En
2008  Key Figures Report Comision 2008 2009 En2008  Key Figures Report Comision 2008 2009 En
2008 Key Figures Report Comision 2008 2009 En
 
cooperation_final
cooperation_finalcooperation_final
cooperation_final
 
20070115 FP7 Info
20070115 FP7 Info20070115 FP7 Info
20070115 FP7 Info
 
Workshop 4 - "EURORDIS Research Policy recommendation"
Workshop 4 - "EURORDIS Research Policy recommendation"Workshop 4 - "EURORDIS Research Policy recommendation"
Workshop 4 - "EURORDIS Research Policy recommendation"
 
Scientific information literacy and European Open Access policies
Scientific information literacy and European Open Access policiesScientific information literacy and European Open Access policies
Scientific information literacy and European Open Access policies
 
Open Access in Europe
Open Access in EuropeOpen Access in Europe
Open Access in Europe
 
Graham Hughes - Beta Technology - FP 7 Call Presentation
Graham Hughes - Beta Technology - FP 7 Call PresentationGraham Hughes - Beta Technology - FP 7 Call Presentation
Graham Hughes - Beta Technology - FP 7 Call Presentation
 
Celina Ramjoué: Open Access in the European Research Area (ERA)
Celina Ramjoué: Open Access in the European Research Area (ERA)Celina Ramjoué: Open Access in the European Research Area (ERA)
Celina Ramjoué: Open Access in the European Research Area (ERA)
 
Horizon 2020 - Oportunidades entre UE y LAC. Octubre 2017
Horizon 2020 - Oportunidades entre UE y LAC. Octubre 2017Horizon 2020 - Oportunidades entre UE y LAC. Octubre 2017
Horizon 2020 - Oportunidades entre UE y LAC. Octubre 2017
 
Com2005 0118en01
Com2005 0118en01Com2005 0118en01
Com2005 0118en01
 
Trends in European research projects focused on technological ecosystems in t...
Trends in European research projects focused on technological ecosystems in t...Trends in European research projects focused on technological ecosystems in t...
Trends in European research projects focused on technological ecosystems in t...
 
2018 burgelman tsoukala athens may 31_final
2018 burgelman tsoukala athens may 31_final2018 burgelman tsoukala athens may 31_final
2018 burgelman tsoukala athens may 31_final
 
Informe final: "Mapeo y análisis de las tecnologías posibles para el aprendiz...
Informe final: "Mapeo y análisis de las tecnologías posibles para el aprendiz...Informe final: "Mapeo y análisis de las tecnologías posibles para el aprendiz...
Informe final: "Mapeo y análisis de las tecnologías posibles para el aprendiz...
 
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU. Agenda 2016
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU. Agenda 2016Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU. Agenda 2016
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU. Agenda 2016
 
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU, Agenda 2016.
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU, Agenda 2016.Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU, Agenda 2016.
Science, Research and Innovation performance of the EU, Agenda 2016.
 
FISTERA - a personal view
FISTERA - a personal viewFISTERA - a personal view
FISTERA - a personal view
 
Pcp final-ramboll-report-js2 en
Pcp final-ramboll-report-js2 enPcp final-ramboll-report-js2 en
Pcp final-ramboll-report-js2 en
 
201201 19 gold oa (dechamp)
201201 19 gold oa (dechamp)201201 19 gold oa (dechamp)
201201 19 gold oa (dechamp)
 
International collaboration in a research institute: a bibliometric study
International collaboration in a research institute: a bibliometric studyInternational collaboration in a research institute: a bibliometric study
International collaboration in a research institute: a bibliometric study
 

Mehr von Steph Cliche

Sc2014 proceedings
Sc2014 proceedingsSc2014 proceedings
Sc2014 proceedingsSteph Cliche
 
Safes locking device-_mechanical_locks_versus_electronic_locks
Safes locking device-_mechanical_locks_versus_electronic_locksSafes locking device-_mechanical_locks_versus_electronic_locks
Safes locking device-_mechanical_locks_versus_electronic_locksSteph Cliche
 
Ieee project-2014-2015-context-based-access-control-systems
Ieee project-2014-2015-context-based-access-control-systemsIeee project-2014-2015-context-based-access-control-systems
Ieee project-2014-2015-context-based-access-control-systemsSteph Cliche
 
Ieee interference-measurements-802.11n
Ieee interference-measurements-802.11nIeee interference-measurements-802.11n
Ieee interference-measurements-802.11nSteph Cliche
 
Guardi final report
Guardi final reportGuardi final report
Guardi final reportSteph Cliche
 
2010 12-03 a-lawyers_guidetodata
2010 12-03 a-lawyers_guidetodata2010 12-03 a-lawyers_guidetodata
2010 12-03 a-lawyers_guidetodataSteph Cliche
 
Tmplab hostile wrt-5-hacklu
Tmplab hostile wrt-5-hackluTmplab hostile wrt-5-hacklu
Tmplab hostile wrt-5-hackluSteph Cliche
 
Penetration document format slides
Penetration document format slidesPenetration document format slides
Penetration document format slidesSteph Cliche
 
Le petit livre_du_hacker_2013
Le petit livre_du_hacker_2013Le petit livre_du_hacker_2013
Le petit livre_du_hacker_2013Steph Cliche
 
013 50001-001 spy-elite_operators_manual_rev_e
013 50001-001 spy-elite_operators_manual_rev_e013 50001-001 spy-elite_operators_manual_rev_e
013 50001-001 spy-elite_operators_manual_rev_eSteph Cliche
 
Hack.lu 09 ip-morph
Hack.lu 09 ip-morphHack.lu 09 ip-morph
Hack.lu 09 ip-morphSteph Cliche
 
7 1-system plus-evolution_spares_eng_6.0
7 1-system plus-evolution_spares_eng_6.07 1-system plus-evolution_spares_eng_6.0
7 1-system plus-evolution_spares_eng_6.0Steph Cliche
 
Global maritime-security
Global maritime-securityGlobal maritime-security
Global maritime-securitySteph Cliche
 

Mehr von Steph Cliche (20)

Spy pack
Spy packSpy pack
Spy pack
 
Spyddr
SpyddrSpyddr
Spyddr
 
Sc2014 proceedings
Sc2014 proceedingsSc2014 proceedings
Sc2014 proceedings
 
Sat howto
Sat howtoSat howto
Sat howto
 
Satellite hacking
Satellite hackingSatellite hacking
Satellite hacking
 
Safes locking device-_mechanical_locks_versus_electronic_locks
Safes locking device-_mechanical_locks_versus_electronic_locksSafes locking device-_mechanical_locks_versus_electronic_locks
Safes locking device-_mechanical_locks_versus_electronic_locks
 
Ieee project-2014-2015-context-based-access-control-systems
Ieee project-2014-2015-context-based-access-control-systemsIeee project-2014-2015-context-based-access-control-systems
Ieee project-2014-2015-context-based-access-control-systems
 
Ieee interference-measurements-802.11n
Ieee interference-measurements-802.11nIeee interference-measurements-802.11n
Ieee interference-measurements-802.11n
 
Guardi final report
Guardi final reportGuardi final report
Guardi final report
 
718001 000 en
718001 000 en718001 000 en
718001 000 en
 
2010 12-03 a-lawyers_guidetodata
2010 12-03 a-lawyers_guidetodata2010 12-03 a-lawyers_guidetodata
2010 12-03 a-lawyers_guidetodata
 
Tmplab hostile wrt-5-hacklu
Tmplab hostile wrt-5-hackluTmplab hostile wrt-5-hacklu
Tmplab hostile wrt-5-hacklu
 
Penetration document format slides
Penetration document format slidesPenetration document format slides
Penetration document format slides
 
Le petit livre_du_hacker_2013
Le petit livre_du_hacker_2013Le petit livre_du_hacker_2013
Le petit livre_du_hacker_2013
 
013 50001-001 spy-elite_operators_manual_rev_e
013 50001-001 spy-elite_operators_manual_rev_e013 50001-001 spy-elite_operators_manual_rev_e
013 50001-001 spy-elite_operators_manual_rev_e
 
Hack.lu 09 ip-morph
Hack.lu 09 ip-morphHack.lu 09 ip-morph
Hack.lu 09 ip-morph
 
12
1212
12
 
09 09 2014
09 09 201409 09 2014
09 09 2014
 
7 1-system plus-evolution_spares_eng_6.0
7 1-system plus-evolution_spares_eng_6.07 1-system plus-evolution_spares_eng_6.0
7 1-system plus-evolution_spares_eng_6.0
 
Global maritime-security
Global maritime-securityGlobal maritime-security
Global maritime-security
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Manik S Magar
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionDilum Bandara
 
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software DevelopersA Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software DevelopersNicole Novielli
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningLars Bell
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfMounikaPolabathina
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfLoriGlavin3
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsSergiu Bodiu
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanDatabarracks
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteTake control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteDianaGray10
 
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directionsTime Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directionsNathaniel Shimoni
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersRaghuram Pandurangan
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
 
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software DevelopersA Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
A Journey Into the Emotions of Software Developers
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteTake control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
 
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directionsTime Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 

Fp7themesconsultation en

  • 1. RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION ON RESEARCH THEMES IN FP7 DG Research, European Commission, 16 March 2005 1. INTRODUCTION An open consultation was undertaken by the Commission during November and December 2004 to allow interested individuals and organisations to submit contributions regarding thematic domains for transnational collaborative research to be supported in the 7 th Framework Programme for research and technological development. This consultation followed a more general consultation on the Commission’s guidelines for future EU policy to support research1 and complemented a number of more specific consultations on thematic domains in fields such as Information and Communication Technologies, Social Science and Humanities, Foresight and Nanotechnology.2 Over 1800 contributions were received and this note provides some information about the types and level of response. The contents of the contributions are being used to help prepare the Commission’s proposals for the 7th Framework Programme. In many cases the detailed nature of the contributions means that they will be considered in the preparation of the proposals for the Specific Programmes under the 7th Framework Programme. 2. TYPES OF RESPONSES A total of 1824 contributions were received 3 of which approximately half came from individuals and half from organisations. The highest number of organisational responses came from associations, closely followed by universities/higher education and then research institutes. The highest number of individual responses came from universities/higher education. Around 10 percent of organisational responses came from commercial bodies and from government bodies. Type of organisation: Governmental body University/higher education Commercial (more than 250 employees) Commercial (less than 250 employees) Research institute Association Other Total All responses Number Percentage 163 8,9% 618 33,9% 65 3,6% 49 2,7% 403 22,1% 311 17,1% 215 11,8% 1824 100,0% 1 Of which organisational responses Number Percentage 98 10,6% 234 25,4% 51 5,5% 43 4,7% 182 19,7% 246 26,7% 68 7,4% 922 100,0% A report on the results is available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/index_en.cfm Links to these consultations are available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/themes/index_en.cfm 3 This total excludes duplicate responses. 2 1
  • 2. Contributions came from a wide spread of countries, including all EU Member States except Luxembourg. The highest numbers came from the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, France and Spain. Collectively, over 100 responses (6.4 % of the total) came from the 10 new Member States. Country of response AT – Austria BE – Belgium CY – Cyprus CZ - Czech Republic DE – Germany DK – Denmark EE – Estonia EL – Greece ES – Spain FI – Finland FR – France HU – Hungary IE – Ireland IT – Italy LT – Lithuania LU - Luxembourg LV – Látvia Number 41 85 4 6 239 33 15 33 151 65 154 9 22 97 22 0 4 Percentage 2,2% 4,7% 0,2% 0,3% 13,1% 1,8% 0,8% 1,8% 8,3% 3,6% 8,4% 0,5% 1,2% 5,3% 1,2% 0,0% 0,2% Country of response MT – Malta NL – Netherlands PL – Poland PT – Portugal SK - Slovak Republic SL – Slovenia SV – Sweden UK - United Kingdom BG – Bulgaria CH – Switzerland IL – Israel IS – Iceland NO – Norway RO – Romania TR – Turkey Other country International organisation TOTAL 3. Number 10 209 35 44 4 8 72 276 6 28 13 0 37 3 11 22 66 1824 Percentage 0,5% 11,5% 1,9% 2,4% 0,2% 0,4% 3,9% 15,1% 0,3% 1,5% 0,7% 0,0% 2,0% 0,2% 0,6% 1,2% 3,6% 100,0% RESEARCH AREAS WHICH CONTRIBUTIONS RELATE TO. Participants were asked to indicate which area(s) of research in the 6th Framework Programme their contribution related to. A significant number of contributions related to each of the areas under the 6th Framework Programme as well as to security research. The highest number related to global change and ecosystems and to combating major diseases, and a large number to food quality and safety, to advanced genomics and its applications to health and to sustainable energy systems. It should be pointed out that the number of contributions received is not considered to be an indicator of the relevant importance of the thematic priorities, given that this depends on the justification of topics proposed against the three defined criteria and also that respondents to the consultation were “self selecting”. Most of the topics suggested by participants fit within the scope of the thematic priorities of the 6 th Framework Programme, although in some cases they relate to specific topics which are not covered by the work programmes. Many of the contributions therefore contained topics which were indicated to be “not covered in the 6th Framework Programme”. In addition, for a significant number of such responses the topics of “marine research” or “complementary and alternative medicine” were proposed, and some of these responses may have been the result of a coordinated campaign. 2
  • 3. Area(s) of research under the 6 th Framework Programme to which contributions relate to: Advanced genomics and its applications to health Combating major diseases Information society technologies Nanotechnologies and nanosciences, knowledge based multifunctional materials and new production Aeronautics Space Food quality and safety Sustainable energy systems Nuclear fusion and/or fission Sustainable surface transport Global change and ecosystems Citizens and governance in a knowledge based society Research to support policy Security (not covered in the 6th Framework Programme) Other areas not covered in the 6th Framework Programme 4. 256 590 187 % of responses indicating the area 14,0% 32,3% 10,3% 138 63 66 272 216 54 134 755 130 338 102 843 7,6% 3,5% 3,6% 14,9% 11,8% 3,0% 7,3% 41,4% 7,1% 18,5% 5,6% 46,2% Number CONCLUSIONS The Commission is using the results of this consultation in the preparation of its proposal for the 7th Framework Programme. For this exercise, the contributions from this consultation are considered along side the views expressed by European Institutions, other written contributions and position papers submitted to the Commission, as well as the outcomes of other relevant consultations, workshops and events relating to specific fields of research. The results suggest that the thematic priorities of the 6th Framework Programme, together with the new areas of Space and Security, cover the vast majority of the topics which stakeholders would like to see supported in the 7th Framework Programme, although in many cases a wider range of topics would need to be supported under each priority. In addition, many of the contributions relate to topics which are of a too detailed nature for the Framework Programme proposal, and so will be considered in the context of preparing the proposals for the Specific Programmes. 3
  • 4. ANNEX: TEXT FROM WEBSITE AND COMMENTS FORM. Introduction The European Commission is undertaking a process to identify thematic domains for future European support under the 7th Framework Programme. It is essential to identify those domains where support at European level is most needed and will have the greatest impact, as set out in the Communication Science and Technology, the key to Europe’s future – Guidelines for future European Union policy to support research. This concerns support where thematic domains will be predetermined at the start of the Framework Programmes. This is particularly important for future support to transnational collaborative research. The thematic domains to be identified will cover an area of research in which a range of research projects and networks should be supported in the medium term and allow sufficient flexibility to take into account scientific, industrial and policy developments during the period of the 7th Framework Programme. The Commission wishes to identify thematic domains which should continue from the Sixth Framework Programme as well as new and emerging ones (including those in the two new areas of space and security which are described in the Commission Communication). A full list of thematic domains under the current priorities can be found in the Annex I to the Decisions on the Sixth Framework of the European Commission and of Euratom. The Commission will present a list of thematic domains for future European Union support to research when it presents the proposal for the 7th Framework Programme, due in 2005. Criteria to identify thematic domains The Commission is using the following three criteria in order to identify which thematic domains will be included in the proposal for the 7th Framework Programme. 1. Contribution to EU policy objectives The research in the thematic domain must generate new knowledge to meet societal needs and catalyse the delivery of a European policy objective(s), including the objective to transform Europe into a dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy, capable of sustainable economic growth. Relevant policy objectives include those in the areas of health, consumer protection, energy, the environment, development aid, agriculture and fisheries, biotechnology, information and communication technologies, transport, education and training, employment, social affairs, economic cohesion, justice and home affairs. The thematic domain may be one of current importance or likely to become important in the medium to long term. To be assessed through: research needs stemming from EU Treaties and policy commitments; analysis of market prospects and competitive position of EU industries; future needs identified in Foresight and similar exercises; views from the research community and industry. 2. European research potential The thematic domain must be one where there is a strong potential for excellent research and technological development and for disseminating and converting the results into social and economic benefits. For example future support should, wherever possible, build on past and current investments and successes in relevant areas of research and its application. To be assessed through: analysis of past investments, experience and successes in the Framework Programme; international comparisons of European research performance; views from the research community and industry. 3. European added value There must be a strong need for additional public funding and for such intervention to be at a European level. • Additional public funding to be justified by the externalities and wider benefits from the research and by the need to attract increased public and private investments. 4
  • 5. • European level intervention to be justified by the need for European centres of excellence through collaborative research: to create the necessary multi-disciplinarity and critical mass of scale and scope; to overcome fragmentation and unnecessary duplication, lack of connections and of interoperability; to complement other intergovernmental, national and private actions; to address shared or European level problems; or to enhance visibility of European research excellence. To be assessed through: analysis of levels and impact of current public support available in the Europe Union and its Member States and in comparison with other countries; views from the research community and industry. How to contribute to the debate The Commission welcomes contributions to the debate on identifying future thematic domains from the research community and users of research, including: research organisations and associations; industrial and sector associations; individual universities, enterprises and research institutes; and all individuals and groups with an interest in research. Contributions can be made in two ways: • A range of activities, fora, and documents are available which relate to the identification of future European research priorities in defined thematic areas of research. Interested parties are invited to make their contributions through these fora. (See sidebar for links to relevant fora.)These thematic activities follow on from the general consultation on the guidelines for future European Union policy to support research which was undertaken from July to October 2004. • For organisations and individuals who wish to make a contribution in addition to any contribution to the general consultation or which does not relate to the existing thematic fora or is a consolidated contribution across a number of thematic areas, the comments form can be used to send contributions. Please note that the Commission is not seeking views on detailed research topics for calls for proposals. Consolidated contributions that represent the views of a number of institutions and/or individuals would be particularly welcome. The Commission will ensure that all contributions received are transmitted to the competent persons within the Commission to inform the analysis of thematic domains to be included in the 7th Framework Programme proposal. To ensure that they can be properly included in the analysis, the Commission would welcome contributions as early as possible and by no later than the end of the 2004. A report on the contributions received will be made available in due course at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/index_en.html 5
  • 6. Comments Form What will happen to the data you submit? Read our Specific Privacy Statement [http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/sps-eform_en.html] *Are you responding on a personal basis or on behalf of your organisation *Name of your organisation (write “none” if you have no affiliation) Department: Position: *Type of organisation: [governmental body; university/higher education; commercial organisation (more than 250 employees); commercial organisation (less than 250 employees); association (e.g. trade association, research association, civil society organisation); other] *Contact name: *Contact email: *Country (EU countries listed first): [AT – Austria; BE – Belgium; CY – Cyprus; CZ - Czech Republic; DE – Germany; DK – Denmark; EE – Estonia; EL – Greece;ES – Spain; FI – Finland; FR – France; HU – Hungary; E – Ireland; IT – Italy; LT – Lithuania; LU - Luxembourg ;LV – Látvia; MT – Malta; NL – Netherlands; PL – Poland; PT – Portugal; SK - Slovak Republic; SL – Slovenia; SV – Sweden; UK - United Kingdom; BG – Bulgaria; CH – Switzerland; IL – Israel ;IS – Iceland; NO – Norway; RO – Romania; TR – Turkey; Other country; International organisation] *Area(s) of research from the 6th Framework Programme that your contribution relates to: Advanced genomics and its applications to health Combating major diseases Information society technologies Nanotechnologies and nanosciences, knowledge based multifunctional materials, new production Aeronautics Space Food quality and safety Sustainable energy systems Nuclear fusion, nuclear fission and radiation protection Sustainable surface transport Global change and ecosystems Citizens and governance in a knowledge based society Research to support policy Science and society Security (not covered in the 6th Framework Programme) Other areas not covered in the 6th Framework Programme Please specify *Please attach your contribution here (plain text, MS-WORD, RTF, WordPerfect PDF formats; only one attachment): Documents should be no longer than 5 pages and should provide a short description of the thematic domain and relevant information to support the thematic domain using the three criteria. Longer documents are appropriate for consolidated contributions that cover a number of different thematic domains. Any additional comments: 6