Presentation on Creative Commons licences by Professor Anne Fitzgerald to the Australasian Medical Writers Association (AMWA( Webinar, 26 September 2013
5. Generic 2.0 ‘take the old machine’ by Angelo González, http://www.flickr.com/photos/21251150@N04/5291456294
Photographs, paintings,
images, sculptures…(artistic works)
6. Generic 2.0 ‘I Giovani e la Musica’ by Super UbO, http://www.flickr.com/photos/14443853@N07/5362778675
Music, sound recordings,
radio broadcasts…
7. Generic 2.0 ‘Apollo 11 Video Restoration Press Conference / Newseum’ by NASA Goddard Space Flight Centre, http://www.flickr.com/photos/24662369@N07/3726614425
Films, Videos, Theatre,
TV broadcasts…(cinematograph films, dramatical works, television broadcasts)
8. Blogs, books, articles, essays…
(literary works, published editions of works)
Generic 2.0 ‘_MG_0318’ by Zitona, http://www.flickr.com/photos/zitona/5021203226/
9. Compilations of data…
("literary work" includes: … a table, or compilation , expressed in words, figures or symbols – s 10, Copyright Act 1968)
)
Generic 2.0 ‘_MG_0318’ by Zitona, http://www.flickr.com/photos/zitona/5021203226/
13. Generic 2.0 That time of year again… by Etwood, http://flickr.com/photos/etwood/231364920
legal advice (s43)
research or study (s40)
criticism or review (s41)
parody or satire (s41A)
reporting of news (s42)
Fair dealing
Unless the law provides otherwise…
30. Attribution (BY)
Copyright notice - Keep notices that refer to the
Licence or Disclaimers
Name of author and other Attribution parties
Source and Title of the work
Licence URL/hyperlink
In a Derivative Work, identify the changes made to the
original
No suggestion of endorsement
Attribution is to be done “In a manner reasonable to the
medium you are using”
32. Non Commercial (NC)
“Commercial” defined as meaning “primarily intended
for or directed towards commercial advantage or
private monetary compensation”
34. No Derivative Works (ND)
“Derivative Work" means material in any form that is
created by editing, modifying or adapting the Work, a
substantial part of the Work, or the Work and other
pre-existing works.
Derivative Works may, for example, include a
translation, adaptation, musical
arrangement, dramatisation, motion picture
version, sound recording, art
reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other
form in which the Work may be transformed or
adapted…
36. Share Alike (SA)
Clause 4B(a) Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Australia:
You may only Distribute or publicly perform a
Derivative Work if You apply one of the following
licences to it:
i) this Licence;
ii) a later version of this Licence with the same Licence
Elements (such as Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Australia); or
iii) a Creative Commons Unported licence or a licence from
another jurisdiction (either this or a later version) that has the
same Licence Elements; or
iv) a Creative Commons Compatible Licence. (* note this last
option is not available in CC BY NC SA 3.0 Australia)
37. How do people use CC?
Licensing out: use CC licences on copyright materials you
create
enable others to find your material online through using the standard
search engines; give permission to others to lawfully use your material
(eg copy, on-distribute, post to a website, value add, mashup
e.g.
Repositories – Wikipedia, Flickr, YouTube
Institutions/Organisations – ABC, Al Jazeera
Licensing in: use copyright materials created by others that
are distributed under CC licences
enable you to find their material online through using the standard
search engines; give permission to you to lawfully use their material eg
copy, on-distribute, post to a website, value add, mashup e.g.
students using CC material from Wikipedia in their projects
teachers using Open Educational Resources (OER) licensed under CC
In either case, the scope of re-use will depend on which CC licence
selected
38. Creative Commons, The Power of Open, available at http://thepowerofopen.org/,
licensed under CC BY, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
CC licensed material
39. CC BY SA
Most of Wikipedia's text and many of its images are dual-
licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-
Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU
Free Documentation License (GFDL)
The small print:
“ Text is available under the Creative Commons
Attribution-Share Alike License; additional terms
may apply. See Terms of Use for details ....”
Information for text contributors to Wikimedia
projects
To grow the commons of free knowledge and free culture,
all users contributing to Wikimedia projects are required
to grant broad permissions to the general public to re-
distribute and re-use their contributions freely, as long as
the use is attributed and the same freedom to re-use and
re-distribute applies to any derivative works. Therefore,
for any text you hold the copyright to, by
submitting it, you agree to license it under the
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0
Unported License. For compatibility reasons, you are
also required to license it under the GNU Free
Documentation License. Re-users can choose the license(s)
they wish to comply with. Please note that these licenses
do allow commercial uses of your contributions,
as long as such uses are compliant with the
terms.
As an author, you agree to be attributed in any of the
following fashions: a) through a hyperlink (where possible)
or URL to the article or articles you contributed to, b)
through a hyperlink (where possible) or URL to an
alternative, stable online copy which is freely accessible,
which conforms with the license, and which provides credit
to the authors in a manner equivalent to the credit given
on this website, or c) through a list of all authors. (Any list
of authors may be filtered to exclude very small or
irrelevant contributions.)
40. “Visitors to this website
agree to grant a non-
exclusive, irrevocable, royal
ty-free license to the rest of
the world for their
submissions to
Whitehouse.gov under the
Creative Commons
Attribution 3.0 License.”
51. Australian Research Council (ARC)
Open Access policy
Effective 1 January 2013
Any publications arising from an ARC supported
research project must be deposited into an open access
institutional repository within a twelve (12) month
period from the date of publication
Requirement subject to legal or contractual obligations
(i.e. restrictive publishing contracts which prohibit/do
not allow for open access)
http://www.arc.gov.au/applicants/open_access.htm
56. The PLOS Gold OA model
To provide open access, PLOS journals use a business model in which our expenses — including those of peer
review, journal production, and online hosting and archiving — are recovered in part by charging a
publication fee to the authors or research sponsors for each article they publish.
Our prices, which have not been raised since August 2009, are as follows:
PLOS Biology US$2900
PLOS Medicine US$2900
PLOS Computational Biology
US$2250
PLOS Genetics US$2250
PLOS Pathogens US$2250
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
US$2250
PLOS ONE US$1350
PLOS is committed to the widest possible global participation in open access publishing. To determine the
appropriate fee, we use a country-based pricing model, which is based on the country that provides 50% or
more of the primary funding for the research that is being submitted. Research articles funded by Upper
Middle and High Income Countries incur our standard publication fees. Corresponding authors who are
affiliated with one of our Institutional Members are eligible for a discount on this fee. Such authors will be
informed of the discount applicable after submission of their manuscript.
Fees for Low and Lower Middle Income Countries are calculated according to the PLOS Global Participation
Initiative for manuscripts submitted after 9am Pacific Time on September 4, 2012 (this program is not
retroactive).
Group One: Countries from this list will not be charged for publishing
Group Two: Countries from this list will be charged a flat $500
57. The BioMed Central Gold OA model
http://www.biomedcentral.com/about
BioMed Central is an STM (Science, Technology and Medicine)
publisher of 257 peer-reviewed open access journals. The
portfolio of journals spans all areas of biology, biomedicine and
medicine and includes broad interest titles, such as BMC Biology
and BMC Medicine alongside specialist journals, such as
Retrovirology and BMC Genomics. All original research articles
published by BioMed Central are made freely accessible online
immediately upon publication.
BioMed Central levies an article-processing charge to cover
the cost of the publication process. Authors publishing
with BioMed Central retain the copyright to their
work, licensing it under the Creative Commons Attribution
License which allows articles to be re-used and re-distributed
without restriction, as long as the original work is correctly cited.
BioMed Central is owned by Springer Science+ Business
Media, and also hosts the SpringerOpen platform.
58. Directory of Open Access Journals
The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) lists 3,648 (36.7 of the total 9,938) (as at 26 September 2013) as using
some kind of Creative Commons licence – see http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=byLicense
CC-by Attribution (by) (1814 journals)
CC-by-sa Attribution Share Alike (by-sa) (48 journals)
CC-by-nd Attribution No Derivatives (by-nd) (46 journals)
CC-by-nc Attribution Non-commercial (by-nc) (795 journals)
CC-by-nc-sa Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike (by-nc-sa) (247 journals)
CC-by-nc-nd Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) (698 journals)
The DOAJ also categories OA journals according to publication (“article processing”) fees payable – see
http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=byPublicationFee&uiLanguage=en
No Article Processing Charge (6517 journals)
With Article Processing Charge (2709 journals)
Conditional Article Processing Charge (499 journals)
No information re Article Processing Charge (200 journals)
59. Guidelines for OA (UNESCO)
The Creative Commons organisation has developed a set of licences from which authors or publishers can choose.
Some Open Access publishers use Creative Commons licences to ensure that the content of the articles published in
their journals are reusable in the widest (libre Open Access) sense: that is, they can be reproduced, abstracted, ‘mashed
up’ with other material to produce new information, crawled by text-mining and data-mining tools and so on.
▶ Open Access requires the copyright holder’s consent
▶ The norm is to sign the whole bundle of rights over to the journal publisher, though it is not necessary to do this in
most cases: publishers can go about their work so long as the author signs over to them the right to publish the work
▶ Authors and other copyright holders (employers and funders) can retain the rights they need to make the work Open
Access
▶ Licensing scientific works is good practice because it makes clear to the user what can be done with the work and by
that can encourage use
▶ Creative Commons licensing is best practice because the system is well-understood, provides a suite of
licences that cover all needs, and the licences are machine-readable
From “Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Open Access” by Alma Swan (2012)
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002158/215863e.pdf - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO) Communication and Information Sector
64. Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College
and Career Training Grant Program (TAACCCT):
US $2 billion in funding provided under federal education
fund to create OER resources for use in community colleges
P062311PS-0339 by The White House (US Government Work) http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/5937200216
88. Vimeo
http://vimeo.com/search
YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/editor
Generic 2.0 ‘Afghan Air Force and Afghan National Army Combine Combat Training Exercises’ by isafmedia , http://www.flickr.com/photos/29456680@N06/5413482056
Video
128. • More examples of how CC is being used:
• http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Case_Studies
• Other resources (fact sheets etc.):
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Documentation
• On business models, see further Cheryl Foong, “Sharing with
Creative Commons: a business model for content creators” (2010)
Platform: Journal of Media and Communication 64, available at
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/40800/
• My publications are available at
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/view/person/Foong,_Cheryl.html)
130. CC Australia
More information at creativecommons.org.au and
creativecommons.org
Twitter: @ccAustralia @eduCCau @govCCau
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ccAustralia
Professor Anne Fitzgerald
Publications:
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/view/person/Fitzgerald,_Anne.html
Twitter: @AnneMFitzgerald
CC & Government Guide: Using Creative Commons 3.0 Australia
Licences on Government Copyright Materials
Anne Fitzgerald, Neale Hooper & Cheryl Foong (2011)
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/38364/
http://creativecommons.org.au/sectors/government
Hinweis der Redaktion
Vast pool of CC licensed material available
SourcesHeather Morrison, ‘PLoS ONE: now the world’s largest journal?’, The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics (blog), 5 January 2011, available at http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com.au/2011/01/plos-one-now-worlds-largest-journal.html. Glenn Otis Brown, ‘Public Library of Science’ (interview with Michael Eisen, co-founder of PLoS), CC News, 1 September 2005, available at http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7038.PLoS License, http://www.plos.org/about/open-access/license/ (accessed on 1 February 2012). Jane Park, ‘An Interview with Frances Pinter of Bloomsbury Academic’, CC News, 20 October 2008, available at http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/10100.
OpenCourseWare Consortium Toolkit: Maintaining Intellectual Property at http://www.ocwconsortium.org/en/community/toolkit/maintainingip
BY NC SA 3.0 US http://ocw.mit.edu/terms/#cc
See http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/eta20101436.htm and http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/26100
http://www.khanacademy.org/
http://www.khanacademy.org/about/tos#7
http://search.creativecommons.org/
http://www.google.ca/advanced_search
http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/
“Search on Flickr with some magic"
Licences and conditions are machine-readable and searchable More and more innovative search tools emerging
See Kay Kremerskothen, ‘6,000,000,000’, Flickr Blog, 4 August 2011, available at http://blog.flickr.net/en/2011/08/04/6000000000/. See Kay Kremerskothen, ‘200 million Creative Commons photos and counting!’, Flickr Blog, 5 October 2011, available at http://blog.flickr.net/en/2011/10/05/200-million-creative-commons-photos-and-counting/