Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Andere mochten auch
Ähnlich wie Price Decline By States
Ähnlich wie Price Decline By States (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Price Decline By States
- 1. California: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 280 260 240 Excluding REOs 220 Including REOs 200 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Florida: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 280 260 240 Excluding REOs 220 Including REOs 200 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 2. Ohio: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 130 125 120 Excluding REOs 115 110 Including REOs 105 100 95 90 85 80 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics New York: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 220 200 Excluding REOs 180 Including REOs 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 3. Michigan: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 140 130 120 Excluding REOs 110 Including REOs 100 90 80 70 60 50 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Illinois: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 170 160 150 Excluding REOs Including REOs 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 4. North Carolina: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 140 135 130 Excluding REOs 125 Including REOs 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics New Jersey: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 240 220 200 Excluding REOs Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 5. Massachusetts: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 200 190 180 Excluding REOs 170 160 Including REOs 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Pennsylvania: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 200 190 180 Excluding REOs 170 160 Including REOs 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Georgia: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 135 130 Excluding REOs 125 Including REOs 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 6. Virginia: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 270 250 Excluding REOs 230 Including REOs 210 190 170 150 130 110 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Tennessee: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 150 140 Excluding REOs Including REOs 130 120 110 100 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Wisconsin: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 170 160 Excluding REOs 150 Including REOs 140 130 120 110 100 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 7. Washington: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 210 190 Excluding REOs Including REOs 170 150 130 110 90 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Minnesota: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 180 170 Excluding REOs 160 Including REOs 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Alabam a: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 160 150 Excluding REOs Including REOs 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 8. Arizona: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 240 220 Excluding REOs 200 Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Kentucky: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 140 135 Excluding REOs 130 Including REOs 125 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 9. Colorado: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 145 140 Excluding REOs 135 Including REOs 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Maryland: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 240 220 Excluding REOs 200 Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Source: LPS Applied Analytics 2009 Oklahom a: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 150 145 Excluding REOs 140 135 Including REOs 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 10. South Carolina: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 160 150 Excluding REOs Including REOs 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Iow a: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 135 130 Excluding REOs 125 Including REOs 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Oregon: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 200 190 Excluding REOs 180 170 Including REOs 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 11. Connecticut: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 220 200 Excluding REOs Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Arkansas: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 150 145 Excluding REOs 140 135 Including REOs 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 12. Nebraska: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 135 130 Excluding REOs 125 Including REOs 120 115 110 105 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Nevada: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 240 220 Excluding REOs 200 Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 80 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics New Ham pshire: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 220 200 Excluding REOs Including REOs 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 13. Rhode Island: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 260 240 Excluding REOs 220 Including REOs 200 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Haw aii: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 300 280 Excluding REOs 260 240 Including REOs 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics
- 14. Delaw are: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 200 190 Excluding REOs 180 170 Including REOs 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Source: LPS Applied Analytics District of Colum bia: Changes in Hom e Prices Based on a Repeat Sales Model (Jan 2000=100) 350 Excluding REOs 300 Including REOs 250 200 150 100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: LPS Applied Analytics Note: In some states, the data represents market activity in major metropolitan areas only.