SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 26
ONE COUNTRY
 TWO ECONOMIES

  Bill Dunkelberg, Chief Economist – NFIB
William J. Dennis, Jr., Pinch Hitter – NFIB
Richmond Fed Credit Markets Symposium
                                April, 2013
                             Charlotte, NC
A Bifurcated Economy

     GDP Growth Tepid while
  Stock Market near Record High

Corporate Profits near Record High
   Unemployment Rate at 7.6%

   [ 0% + 4%] / 2 = 2% Growth
Small Business Optimism Index
              (Quarterly, 1986 = 100)
                                 Source: NFIB Research Foundation

110

105

100

95

90

85
                                        Seasonally Adjusted
80
Small Business Economic Trends
Outlook for Business Expansion
                                            (Pct. “Now Is a Good Time”)



                   30                                                       “NO” for 20 Quarters

                   25
Percent of Firms




                   20
                   15
                   10
                   5
                   0
                             79




                                            88
                                                  91
                                                         94
                                                               97




                                                                                   6
                        76


                                  82
                                       85




                                                                     '0 0
                                                                            '03


                                                                                       '0 9
                                                                                              '1 2
                                                                                  '0
“Not a Good” Time to Expand
                                                      DUE TO ________
                                                             Political   Economic   Costs
                    90
                    80
                    70
Percent of Firms




                    60
                    50     As Pct. Saying “Not a Good Time”
                    40
                    30
                    20
                    10
                     0

                    '01                     '04             '0 7            '10             '1 3
                   Source: NFIB Research Foundation
Reported Change in Past Sales
                                 (Last Three Months vs. Prior Three)
                    30
                    20
                                                                                   Recession Ends
                    10
Percent of Firms




                      0
                    -10
                    -20
                    -30
                                                      [Pct. "Higher" - Pct. "Lower", Seas. Adj.]
                    -40
                                              85
                                                        88


                                                                       94
                                                                               97
                          76
                               79
                                      82




                                                               91




                                                                                      '00
                                                                                              '03
                                                                                                    '06
                                                                                                          '09
                                                                                                                '12
                   Source: NFIB Research Foundation
Earnings Trends -
                                   Pct. “Higher” – Pct. “Lower”

                    0

                   -10
Percent of Firms




                   -20

                   -30

                   -40

                   -50
                                                                    0

                                                                           3

                                                                                  6

                                                                                         9

                                                                                                2
                         76

                              79

                                   82

                                        85

                                             88

                                                  91

                                                       94

                                                            97

                                                                 '0

                                                                        '0

                                                                               '0

                                                                                      '0

                                                                                             '1
Planned Capital Outlays
                                 (Next Three to Six Months)
                   45
                                                                 Source: NFIB Research Foundation
                   40
Percent of Firms




                   35

                   30

                   25

                   20

                   15


                                                                  1

                                                                        4




                                                                                              3
                                                                              7

                                                                                      0
                        77



                                  83

                                       86

                                            89

                                                 92

                                                      95
                             80




                                                           98
                                                                '0

                                                                      '0

                                                                            '0

                                                                                    '1

                                                                                            '1
INVENTORY INVESTMENT PLANS
                               [% PLAN INCREASE – % PLAN DECREASE]

                   15
                                                                   Source: NFIB Research Foundation
                   10
Percent of Firms




                    5

                    0

                    -5

                   -10

                   -15

                                                                    0

                                                                           3
                                                                                  6

                                                                                         9

                                                                                                2
                         76
                              79

                                   82

                                        85
                                             88



                                                       94
                                                  91


                                                            97




                                                                                             '1
                                                                 '0

                                                                        '0
                                                                               '0

                                                                                      '0
Job Openings -
     (Pct. with at Least One Unfilled Opening)
40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5                                           0
                                                   3
                                                          6
                                                                 9
                                                                        2
 76
      79
           82
                85




                               94
                     88
                          91


                                    97
                                         '0
                                                '0
                                                       '0
                                                              '0
                                                                     '1
Net Percent Raising Prices
                  80

                  60
                                         Pct. Increase Minus
                                          Percent Decrease
Percent ofFirms




                  40

                  20

                   0




                                                                             3


                                                                                         9
                                                                         0


                                                                                     6


                                                                                                 2
                    76
                         79
                              82
                                     85
                                            88
                                                   91
                                                            94
                  -20                                            97


                                                                             '0


                                                                                         '0
                                                                      '0


                                                                                  '0


                                                                                              '1
                         Source: NFIB Research Foundation
                  -40
Tepid Small Business Recovery
           A Function of: ?
      1.Credit Supply
      2.Credit Demand
      3.Both
      4.Neither
Single Most Important Problem
                                                                      Source: NFIB Research Foundation
                   45
                   40
                   35
                                                  Inflation       Credit/Interest
Percent of Firms




                   30
                   25
                   20
                   15
                   10
                   5
                   0
                        76

                             79

                                  82

                                       85

                                            88

                                                 91

                                                      94

                                                           97

                                                                '00

                                                                       '03

                                                                               '06

                                                                                       '09

                                                                                               '12
Single Most Important Small Business Problem:

                             2000 – 2013 (monthly)




Source: NFIB Research Foundation
Most Important Problems
Prob.
Rank    Problem – Aug. 2012
1.      Rising Health Care Costs
2.      Uncertainty Over Economic Conditions
3.      Energy Costs
4.      Uncertainty Over Government Actions
5.      Cost of Regulations and Red Tape
6.      Taxes on Business Income
14.     Poor Earnings
26.     Poor Sales
32.     Locating Qualified Employees
56.     Securing Long Term Financing
Regular Borrowing Activity
      (At Least Once a Quarter)


                                  Source: NFIB Research Foundation
Loan Demand Weakens Through
                    the Recession                Source: NFIB Research Foundation
    55
                              Recession Starts


    50

            Pct. – Not Wanting a Loan
    45
m
o
n
P
e
F
c
s
r
t
f
i




    40


    35
Business Loans (Origination) under $1 Million
     from Commercial Banks: 1996 – 2011*




*Represents approximately 80 percent of such loans.
 Source: Community Reinvestment Act data, Federal Financial Examination Council
Outstanding Small C&I and RE Loans by
           Number and Dollar Volume: 1995-2012(p)




Source: Call Reports, FDIC
More/Less in Competition for
               Small Businesses Banking Business




Source: NFIB Research Foundation   Selected Year
Logistic Regression Results Contrasting Credit
     Applicants and Non-Applicants; 2009 – 2011
 Variables                           B             S.E.          Wald          df          Sig.         Exp(B)
  
 New Bus.  (< 4 yrs.)              -.514          .146          12.425          1         .000           .598
 Employees (log)                   -.399          .056          50.441          1         .000           .671
 Construction                      -.308          .155           3.957          1         .047           .735
 Professional Services              .148          .116           1.616          1         .204          1.160
 Owner Sex - Male                   .383          .101          14.362          1         .000          1.467

 Unencumbered RE                    .387          .058          43.736          1         .000          1.472
 Second Mortgage(s)                -.186          .116           2.567          1         .109           .830
 “Under Water” RE                  -.439          .129          11.513          1         .001           .645
 Credit Score                       .007          .002          17.105          1         .000          1.007

 Big Bank Customer                  .020          .094             .046         1         .830          1.020
   
 State RE Economy                   -.060         .049            1.512         1         .219            .942
    
 Constant                           -.417         .153            7.457         1         .006            .659

Applicant = 0, Non = 1; n = 2107; -2 Log likelihood = 2701.967; Cox &Snell R 2 = .084; Nagelkerke R2 = .115
Logistic Regression Results Contrasting Accepted
      and Rejected Borrowers; 2009 – 2011
 Variables                          B            S.E.          Wald           df         Sig.         Exp(B)

 New Bus. (< 4 yrs.)              -.095          .178           .287          1          .592           .909
 Employees (log)                   .066          .068           .945          1          .331          1.069
 Construction                      .372          .210           .287          1          .076          1.451
 Professional Services            -.257          .169          2.311          1          .128           .773
 Owner Sex - Male                  .107          .155            .477         1          .490          1.113

 Unencumbered RE                   .328          .099         10.839          1          .001          1.388
 Second Mortgage(s)               -.597          .149         16.015          1          .000           .550
 “Under Water” RE                 -.560          .157         12.714          1          .000           .571
 Credit Score                      .014          .002         38.568          1          .000          1.014
  
 Big Bank Customer                -.517          .134          15.011         1          .000            .596
   
 State RE Economy                  .204          .070           8.480         1          .004          1.227
  
 Constant                         -.347          .211           2.715         1          .099            .707

 Accept = 1, Reject = 0; n = 1231; - 2 Log likelihood = 1344.014; Cox &Snell R 2 = .144; Nagelkerke R2 = .193
Credit Approval and Discouraged Borrowers
     in States Grouped by Residential Mortgages
                 with Negative Equity
Credit Approval      High Negative Eq.   Med. Negative    Low Negative Eq.   All States
                                              Eq.
Accepted                     43%              59%               63%             56%
Rejected                     57               41                37              44
N                           321               840               249            1410

Not Borrowing        High Negative Eq.   Med. Negative    Low Negative Eq.   All States
                                              Eq.
Non-Borrower                 84%              84%               89%             85%
Discouraged
     Borrower                16               16                11              15
N                           229               544               170             943


Source: NFIB Research Foundation
Small-Employer-Owned Real Estate by Selected
      Real Estate Finance Characteristics – 2010
                             Residential         Business1         Investment       All Real Estate
Characteristic           Total2 Own3 Mort.4 Total2 Own3 Mort.4 Total2 Own3 Mort.4 Total2 Own3 Mort.4
 
Own                       94%                   36%                   37%                95%
1st Mortgage              61     65%            19      63%           18     49%         68    71%
2nd Mortgage              16     17  26%         1       4     7%      2      5     9%   17    18    25%
Upside-Down                6      7  10          1       4     6       3      8    15     8     9    12
Mort. For
   Bus. Purposes          15     16     24       2      9     20        2      5    9    17    18     21
Used as Collateral         7      7     11       4     19     30        2      6   12    11    11     16

 
N                        734    693   457      734     324    198    734     310   166   734   708   537

Source : “Small Business and Credit Access,” NFIB Research Foundation, January 2011.

1
  Businesses operating primarily from the home are included in residential only.
2
  As a percentage of the small employer population.
3
  As a percentage of small employers owning that type of real estate.
4
  As a percentage of small employers with that type of real estate mortgaged.
Summary
• Small business is recovering hesitantly.
• Great uncertainty exists.
• Small business problems associated most often
  with uncertainty, taxes, and regulation.
• Sales problem remains, but is declining.
• Credit has been primarily a demand issue.
• Real estate has played an enormous and under-
  appreciated role in small business problems.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Cosx regression with alternative concepts of waiting time
Cosx regression with alternative concepts of waiting timeCosx regression with alternative concepts of waiting time
Cosx regression with alternative concepts of waiting timeCamilo Pechâ Garz
 
Tips and Strategies for the Parks and Recreation Professional
Tips and Strategies for the Parks and Recreation ProfessionalTips and Strategies for the Parks and Recreation Professional
Tips and Strategies for the Parks and Recreation ProfessionalLutricia Eberly
 
Examen fyq1 2ª ev
Examen fyq1 2ª evExamen fyq1 2ª ev
Examen fyq1 2ª evrojgutant
 
Free media 4 fair malaysia slidesharepresentation 4-15-13
Free media 4 fair malaysia slidesharepresentation 4-15-13Free media 4 fair malaysia slidesharepresentation 4-15-13
Free media 4 fair malaysia slidesharepresentation 4-15-13free2fairmalaysia
 
презентация
презентацияпрезентация
презентацияfilinart
 
Non fiction reading - filippa fritz
Non fiction reading - filippa fritzNon fiction reading - filippa fritz
Non fiction reading - filippa fritzFilippaFritz
 
Bhopal Gas Tragedy case study
Bhopal Gas Tragedy case studyBhopal Gas Tragedy case study
Bhopal Gas Tragedy case studyPrashant Joon
 

Andere mochten auch (9)

Cosx regression with alternative concepts of waiting time
Cosx regression with alternative concepts of waiting timeCosx regression with alternative concepts of waiting time
Cosx regression with alternative concepts of waiting time
 
Tips and Strategies for the Parks and Recreation Professional
Tips and Strategies for the Parks and Recreation ProfessionalTips and Strategies for the Parks and Recreation Professional
Tips and Strategies for the Parks and Recreation Professional
 
Goals And Actions
Goals And ActionsGoals And Actions
Goals And Actions
 
Examen fyq1 2ª ev
Examen fyq1 2ª evExamen fyq1 2ª ev
Examen fyq1 2ª ev
 
Free media 4 fair malaysia slidesharepresentation 4-15-13
Free media 4 fair malaysia slidesharepresentation 4-15-13Free media 4 fair malaysia slidesharepresentation 4-15-13
Free media 4 fair malaysia slidesharepresentation 4-15-13
 
Cpap uso y causas
Cpap uso y causasCpap uso y causas
Cpap uso y causas
 
презентация
презентацияпрезентация
презентация
 
Non fiction reading - filippa fritz
Non fiction reading - filippa fritzNon fiction reading - filippa fritz
Non fiction reading - filippa fritz
 
Bhopal Gas Tragedy case study
Bhopal Gas Tragedy case studyBhopal Gas Tragedy case study
Bhopal Gas Tragedy case study
 

Ähnlich wie One country two economies bill dunkelberg and william dennis

LinkedIn's Q1 2012 Earnings
LinkedIn's Q1 2012 EarningsLinkedIn's Q1 2012 Earnings
LinkedIn's Q1 2012 EarningsLinkedIn
 
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings CallLinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings CallLinkedIn
 
LinkedIn’s Q4 2011 Earnings Announcement
LinkedIn’s Q4 2011 Earnings AnnouncementLinkedIn’s Q4 2011 Earnings Announcement
LinkedIn’s Q4 2011 Earnings AnnouncementLinkedIn
 
The BER's business tendency surveys in South Africa: method and results
The BER's business tendency surveys in South Africa: method and resultsThe BER's business tendency surveys in South Africa: method and results
The BER's business tendency surveys in South Africa: method and resultsGeorge Kershoff
 
LinkedIn Q2 2012 Earnings
LinkedIn Q2 2012 Earnings LinkedIn Q2 2012 Earnings
LinkedIn Q2 2012 Earnings LinkedIn
 
Business Valuation Myths
Business Valuation MythsBusiness Valuation Myths
Business Valuation MythsSpectracom
 

Ähnlich wie One country two economies bill dunkelberg and william dennis (7)

Linked In Q1 2012
Linked In Q1 2012Linked In Q1 2012
Linked In Q1 2012
 
LinkedIn's Q1 2012 Earnings
LinkedIn's Q1 2012 EarningsLinkedIn's Q1 2012 Earnings
LinkedIn's Q1 2012 Earnings
 
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings CallLinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
LinkedIn's Q3 Earnings Call
 
LinkedIn’s Q4 2011 Earnings Announcement
LinkedIn’s Q4 2011 Earnings AnnouncementLinkedIn’s Q4 2011 Earnings Announcement
LinkedIn’s Q4 2011 Earnings Announcement
 
The BER's business tendency surveys in South Africa: method and results
The BER's business tendency surveys in South Africa: method and resultsThe BER's business tendency surveys in South Africa: method and results
The BER's business tendency surveys in South Africa: method and results
 
LinkedIn Q2 2012 Earnings
LinkedIn Q2 2012 Earnings LinkedIn Q2 2012 Earnings
LinkedIn Q2 2012 Earnings
 
Business Valuation Myths
Business Valuation MythsBusiness Valuation Myths
Business Valuation Myths
 

One country two economies bill dunkelberg and william dennis

  • 1. ONE COUNTRY TWO ECONOMIES Bill Dunkelberg, Chief Economist – NFIB William J. Dennis, Jr., Pinch Hitter – NFIB Richmond Fed Credit Markets Symposium April, 2013 Charlotte, NC
  • 2. A Bifurcated Economy GDP Growth Tepid while Stock Market near Record High Corporate Profits near Record High Unemployment Rate at 7.6% [ 0% + 4%] / 2 = 2% Growth
  • 3. Small Business Optimism Index (Quarterly, 1986 = 100) Source: NFIB Research Foundation 110 105 100 95 90 85 Seasonally Adjusted 80
  • 5. Outlook for Business Expansion (Pct. “Now Is a Good Time”) 30 “NO” for 20 Quarters 25 Percent of Firms 20 15 10 5 0 79 88 91 94 97 6 76 82 85 '0 0 '03 '0 9 '1 2 '0
  • 6. “Not a Good” Time to Expand DUE TO ________ Political Economic Costs 90 80 70 Percent of Firms 60 50 As Pct. Saying “Not a Good Time” 40 30 20 10 0 '01 '04 '0 7 '10 '1 3 Source: NFIB Research Foundation
  • 7. Reported Change in Past Sales (Last Three Months vs. Prior Three) 30 20 Recession Ends 10 Percent of Firms 0 -10 -20 -30 [Pct. "Higher" - Pct. "Lower", Seas. Adj.] -40 85 88 94 97 76 79 82 91 '00 '03 '06 '09 '12 Source: NFIB Research Foundation
  • 8. Earnings Trends - Pct. “Higher” – Pct. “Lower” 0 -10 Percent of Firms -20 -30 -40 -50 0 3 6 9 2 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 '0 '0 '0 '0 '1
  • 9. Planned Capital Outlays (Next Three to Six Months) 45 Source: NFIB Research Foundation 40 Percent of Firms 35 30 25 20 15 1 4 3 7 0 77 83 86 89 92 95 80 98 '0 '0 '0 '1 '1
  • 10. INVENTORY INVESTMENT PLANS [% PLAN INCREASE – % PLAN DECREASE] 15 Source: NFIB Research Foundation 10 Percent of Firms 5 0 -5 -10 -15 0 3 6 9 2 76 79 82 85 88 94 91 97 '1 '0 '0 '0 '0
  • 11. Job Openings - (Pct. with at Least One Unfilled Opening) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 3 6 9 2 76 79 82 85 94 88 91 97 '0 '0 '0 '0 '1
  • 12. Net Percent Raising Prices 80 60 Pct. Increase Minus Percent Decrease Percent ofFirms 40 20 0 3 9 0 6 2 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 -20 97 '0 '0 '0 '0 '1 Source: NFIB Research Foundation -40
  • 13. Tepid Small Business Recovery A Function of: ? 1.Credit Supply 2.Credit Demand 3.Both 4.Neither
  • 14. Single Most Important Problem Source: NFIB Research Foundation 45 40 35 Inflation Credit/Interest Percent of Firms 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 '00 '03 '06 '09 '12
  • 15. Single Most Important Small Business Problem: 2000 – 2013 (monthly) Source: NFIB Research Foundation
  • 16. Most Important Problems Prob. Rank Problem – Aug. 2012 1. Rising Health Care Costs 2. Uncertainty Over Economic Conditions 3. Energy Costs 4. Uncertainty Over Government Actions 5. Cost of Regulations and Red Tape 6. Taxes on Business Income 14. Poor Earnings 26. Poor Sales 32. Locating Qualified Employees 56. Securing Long Term Financing
  • 17. Regular Borrowing Activity (At Least Once a Quarter) Source: NFIB Research Foundation
  • 18. Loan Demand Weakens Through the Recession Source: NFIB Research Foundation 55 Recession Starts 50 Pct. – Not Wanting a Loan 45 m o n P e F c s r t f i 40 35
  • 19. Business Loans (Origination) under $1 Million from Commercial Banks: 1996 – 2011* *Represents approximately 80 percent of such loans. Source: Community Reinvestment Act data, Federal Financial Examination Council
  • 20. Outstanding Small C&I and RE Loans by Number and Dollar Volume: 1995-2012(p) Source: Call Reports, FDIC
  • 21. More/Less in Competition for Small Businesses Banking Business Source: NFIB Research Foundation Selected Year
  • 22. Logistic Regression Results Contrasting Credit Applicants and Non-Applicants; 2009 – 2011 Variables B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)   New Bus.  (< 4 yrs.) -.514 .146 12.425 1 .000 .598 Employees (log) -.399 .056 50.441 1 .000 .671 Construction  -.308 .155 3.957 1 .047 .735 Professional Services .148 .116 1.616 1 .204 1.160 Owner Sex - Male .383 .101 14.362 1 .000 1.467 Unencumbered RE .387 .058 43.736 1 .000 1.472 Second Mortgage(s) -.186 .116 2.567 1 .109 .830 “Under Water” RE -.439 .129 11.513 1 .001 .645 Credit Score .007 .002 17.105 1 .000 1.007 Big Bank Customer .020 .094 .046 1 .830 1.020    State RE Economy -.060 .049 1.512 1 .219 .942     Constant -.417 .153 7.457 1 .006 .659 Applicant = 0, Non = 1; n = 2107; -2 Log likelihood = 2701.967; Cox &Snell R 2 = .084; Nagelkerke R2 = .115
  • 23. Logistic Regression Results Contrasting Accepted and Rejected Borrowers; 2009 – 2011 Variables B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) New Bus. (< 4 yrs.) -.095 .178 .287 1 .592 .909 Employees (log) .066 .068 .945 1 .331 1.069 Construction .372 .210 .287 1 .076 1.451 Professional Services -.257 .169 2.311 1 .128 .773 Owner Sex - Male .107 .155 .477 1 .490 1.113 Unencumbered RE .328 .099 10.839 1 .001 1.388 Second Mortgage(s) -.597 .149 16.015 1 .000 .550 “Under Water” RE -.560 .157 12.714 1 .000 .571 Credit Score .014 .002 38.568 1 .000 1.014   Big Bank Customer -.517 .134 15.011 1 .000 .596    State RE Economy .204 .070 8.480 1 .004 1.227   Constant -.347 .211 2.715 1 .099 .707 Accept = 1, Reject = 0; n = 1231; - 2 Log likelihood = 1344.014; Cox &Snell R 2 = .144; Nagelkerke R2 = .193
  • 24. Credit Approval and Discouraged Borrowers in States Grouped by Residential Mortgages with Negative Equity Credit Approval High Negative Eq. Med. Negative  Low Negative Eq. All States Eq. Accepted 43% 59% 63% 56% Rejected 57 41 37 44 N 321 840 249 1410 Not Borrowing High Negative Eq. Med. Negative  Low Negative Eq. All States Eq. Non-Borrower 84% 84% 89% 85% Discouraged      Borrower 16 16 11 15 N 229 544 170 943 Source: NFIB Research Foundation
  • 25. Small-Employer-Owned Real Estate by Selected Real Estate Finance Characteristics – 2010   Residential Business1 Investment All Real Estate Characteristic Total2 Own3 Mort.4 Total2 Own3 Mort.4 Total2 Own3 Mort.4 Total2 Own3 Mort.4   Own 94% 36% 37% 95% 1st Mortgage 61 65% 19 63% 18 49% 68 71% 2nd Mortgage 16 17 26% 1 4 7% 2 5 9% 17 18 25% Upside-Down 6 7 10 1 4 6 3 8 15 8 9 12 Mort. For    Bus. Purposes 15 16 24 2 9 20 2 5 9 17 18 21 Used as Collateral 7 7 11 4 19 30 2 6 12 11 11 16   N 734 693 457 734 324 198 734 310 166 734 708 537 Source : “Small Business and Credit Access,” NFIB Research Foundation, January 2011. 1 Businesses operating primarily from the home are included in residential only. 2 As a percentage of the small employer population. 3 As a percentage of small employers owning that type of real estate. 4 As a percentage of small employers with that type of real estate mortgaged.
  • 26. Summary • Small business is recovering hesitantly. • Great uncertainty exists. • Small business problems associated most often with uncertainty, taxes, and regulation. • Sales problem remains, but is declining. • Credit has been primarily a demand issue. • Real estate has played an enormous and under- appreciated role in small business problems.