SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 9
Incremental Wins – Exponential Impact
                 How Employee Progress Drives Employee Engagement


Executive Summary
In a Harvard Business Review article, “The Power of Small Wins,” Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer
(2011) highlight how important it is for workers to feel as though they are making ‘progress’ on a
frequent basis, noting that progress in meaningful work is a key driver of organizational performance 1.
Using Amabile’s and Kramer’s work as a foundation, HumanR sought to explore two questions:

    1. What is the link between employee progress and employee engagement?
    2. How should managers target their efforts to promote employee progress?

In 2011, HumanR conducted an engagement survey of sixteen organizations to better understand
employee engagement. In addition to asking typical engagement questions on compensation,
supervision, and recognition, we asked questions both on how often the employee makes progress and
how often the employee encounters obstacles to better understand the link between engagement and
progress.

Based on the data from 6000 respondents, we found a strong link between employee perceptions of
their daily progress at work and their level of engagement. The data also revealed key drivers of
workplace progress as well as barriers inhibiting employees from making greater progress.

Finally, the data also provided clear insights on actions that managers can take to better facilitate
employee progress and ultimately improve engagement and performance.


Introduction
The impact of employee engagement on an organization is both well documented and striking. From
less unplanned leave to greater profitability2, a highly-engaged cadre of employees delivers quantifiably
better results to organizations of all types. Conversely, a disengaged workforce yields the opposite
results.

While compensation, buy-in to the organization’s mission, and other organization-level drivers are often
the result of high-level organization-wide actions, the individual manager is pivotal to the level of
engagement of his or her employees.

As a result of their research, Amabile and Kramer (2011) were able to ferret out the difference between
a “good day” and a “bad day” at work. “Good days” are days in which people “feel happy, are

1
 Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer, “The Power of Small Wins,” Harvard Business Review May 2011: 71-80.
2
 “Motivating Employees to Go the Extra Mile: The Manager’s Role in Engagement,” Tom Davenport and Steven
Harding, Towers Watson, 2010.

© 2012, HumanR               1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170                             Page 1
intrinsically motivated by the work itself, and have positive perceptions of their colleagues and the
organization.” “Bad days” are those days when they experience “frustration, fear, and sadness.” Not
surprisingly, Amabile and Kramer found that people are more likely to be creative and productive on
“good days” than “bad days.”

Amabile and Kramer also found the single largest predictor of a “good day” is whether or not employees
made progress in their work – that is, they took steps forward in either their own work or in their team’s
work. In fact, in 76% of days in which workers report leaving work in a good mood, they report that
progress was made. However, on 67% of bad days, employees reported experiencing setbacks or
obstacles. They further argue that “knowing what serves to catalyze and nourish progress – and what
does the opposite – turns out to be the key to effectively managing people and their work.”

In our research we found a strong link between the employee’s perceived level of progress and the
employee’s level of engagement. Additionally, we identified key drivers and barriers to employee
progress. Based on our findings, we make suggestions for managers to facilitate an engaging
environment by enabling and supporting employee progress.


Methodology
As a part of HumanR’s ongoing engagement research, we surveyed sixteen organizations with over
6,000 respondents to further understand factors that influence employees’ engagement levels.
HumanR asked employees to respond to items in several categories, including My Job, My Immediate
Supervisor, Organization-Wide Leadership and Direction, Compensation and Benefits, etc. To examine
how the contribution ‘progress’ plays in employee engagement, the survey asked employees to respond
to items on barriers to productivity, and two questions related to progress and obstacles. Those
questions were:

       In a typical two-week period, I leave work feeling I have made progress on the following number
        of days (Employees could select any number from 0 through 10).
       In a typical two-week period, I encounter obstacles to making progress on the following number
        of days (Employees could select any number from 0 through 10).

The HumanR Engagement Index

HumanR has studied employee engagement throughout the last decade, resulting in a proprietary
Employee Engagement Index. The index yields an engagement score for each survey participant and
allows us to group respondents as Highly Engaged, Engaged, or Disengaged:

       Highly Engaged - Employees demonstrate an emotional commitment to the organization - they
        tend to be self-starters, to take on work that is not necessarily a part of their job, and to be
        loyal.
       Engaged - Employees demonstrate a rational approach to the value of their job, continuing to
        commit for so long as it appears to be in their best interest.


© 2012, HumanR              1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170                         Page 2
   Disengaged - Employees are neither happy nor productive – but find it harder to leave their job
        than to stay – they tend to be cynical and to be harmful to morale.

This survey sample resulted in the following engagement distribution, which fit within our existing
normative data3:

       45 percent (n=2,758) were Highly Engaged,
       39 percent (n=2,375) were Engaged, and
       17 percent (n=1,022) were Disengaged.


Findings
Linking Progress and Engagement

As expected, the results indicate a strong relationship between engagement level and progress. The
more days out of ten an individual reports making progress, the more likely he or she is to be highly
engaged. Conversely, the more days out of ten an individual reports encountering obstacles, the more
likely s/he is to score lower on engagement.

We also combined progress and obstacles into a single measure, referred to hereafter as “Net Progress.”
Net Progress is the difference between the number of days the survey respondent reports making
progress and the number of days the survey respondent reports encountering obstacles. Figure 1
demonstrates the relationship between net progress and level of engagement.

                                                             Figure 1

                                          Net Progress and Engagement Level
                               1800
                               1600
                               1400
            # of Respondents




                               1200
                               1000
                                800                                                       Disengaged
                                600                                                       Engaged
                                400
                                200                                                       Highly Engaged
                                  0
                                      -5 and Less        -4 to +4        +5 and Greater
                                        (n=246)         (n=2909)            (n=2774)
                                                    Net Progress Range




3
 HumanR’s historical normative ranges for engagement levels are: Disengaged: 6%-22%; Engaged: 32%-53%;
Highly Engaged: 32%-61%.

© 2012, HumanR                          1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170                     Page 3
At the high end of Net Progress, i.e. +5 days or more, the number of employees who are highly engaged
overtakes and passes the number of employees who are engaged. Managers, therefore, may wish to
consider +5 Net Progress as a target.

Approximately half of the survey population reports +5 Net Progress or greater, which indicates that in
addition to being quantifiable and meaningful, this target is also attainable.

Driving Net Progress

As seen above, a relationship between net progress and engagement clearly exists. Delving deeper into
the survey data, we found relationships between individual items and net progress. The five items most
highly correlated to net progress are listed below:

    1. At work my ideas and views seem to count.
    2. The organization does a good job of setting customer expectations at the outset of an
       assignment.
    3. I am able to maintain an effective balance between my personal life and my work life.
    4. I am satisfied with the level of teamwork provided by others in the organization outside of my
       immediate workgroup/department.
    5. Within the scope of my job I have the appropriate level of freedom to use my own judgment and
       take action.

To better understand how these items might positively affect progress, consider these responses from
five separate survey respondents who rated these items high. Note their verbatim responses and how
they positively might affect one’s perception of progress.

                          Table 1: Key Drivers and Representative Positive Comments
                      Item            Item Rating    Net Progress    Verbatim Comment: What can be done to
                                         (1 to 5)     (-10 to 10)       make the organization an even better
                                                                                     place to work?
               At work my ideas                                     Willingness to listen to new ideas and a culture
Individual A   and views seem to            5              6        that promotes innovation in processes 'working
               count.                                               smarter, not harder.’
                                                                       The work is challenging and enjoyable. My
               The organization                                        supervisor is excellent to work for and ensures I
               does a good job of                                      have the tools I need to succeed. My customer
               setting customer                                        has placed a high priority on getting the job
Individual B                                5                9         done, but is reasonable in their expectations. At
               expectations at the
               outset of an                                            this point, I am enjoying my job tremendously
               assignment.                                             and don't expect anything to change in terms of
                                                                       my feelings with regard to this situation.
                                                                       I had a work-life balance issue emerge this year
               I am able to                                            that required me to adjust my schedule and
               maintain an                                             responsibilities and I have been fully supported
                                                                       in this. I have never had a hint of worry that if I
               effective balance
Individual C                                5                6         ask for more flexibility I would put my
               between my                                              employment in jeopardy. This has motivated me
               personal life and my                                    to make sure I work extra hard so that the
               work life.                                              company knows that this decision to support me
                                                                       was a good one.



© 2012, HumanR                1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170                                      Page 4
Item            Item Rating   Net Progress   Verbatim Comment: What can be done to
                                         (1 to 5)    (-10 to 10)     make the organization an even better
                                                                               place to work?
               I am satisfied with
               the level of
               teamwork provided                                   I enjoy the collaboration between the project
                                                                   managers, instructional designers, artists,
               by others in the
Individual D                              5              6         programmers, and QA specialists. I also like the
               organization outside                                relaxed work environment and how we pitch in
               of my immediate                                     when other artists are swamped with work.
               workgroup/
               department.
                                                                   The autonomy to do my job and the support I
               Within the scope of                                 receive to provide excellent service to our client
               my job I have the                                   units. I feel my supervisor's beliefs are in line
                                                                   with mine in regards to providing assistance
               appropriate level of
Individual E                              5              9         beyond our sample data collection mission. For
               freedom to use my                                   instance, I am free and encouraged to provide
               own judgment and                                    expertise to clients that not only makes our
               take action.                                        services more valuable but also improves the
                                                                   unit.


Now, consider the negative effect these items can have on progress. Note how these individuals’
negative responses related to these items might negatively affect their perception of their progress.

                          Table 2: Key Drivers and Representative Negative Comments
                      Item            Item Rating   Net Progress   Verbatim Comment: What can be done to
                                         (1 to 5)    (-10 to 10)     make the organization an even better
                                                                               place to work?
                                                                   Address concerns and desires that are identified
               At work my ideas                                    by the employee . . . overall, this organization
Individual V   and views seem to          2              -4        has become the single most dissatisfying,
               count.                                              disheartening, and demotivating workplace that
                                                                   I have ever experienced.
               The organization                                    In my experience the management of my
               does a good job of                                  organization promises many things to the client
                                                                   and then does not provide the resources or
               setting customer
Individual W                              2              -2        managerial support to get them done, which
               expectations at the                                 means that we are always behind schedule and
               outset of an                                        under budget and cutting corners. This leads to
               assignment.                                         a high stress work environment.
               I am able to                                        People do not take ownership of their
               maintain an                                         responsibilities, thus making others take on
                                                                   more than they should. Some people get to go
               effective balance
Individual X                              2              -6        home on time, the rest struggle to keep the boat
               between my                                          afloat for the good of all. Management's role in
               personal life and my                                trying to get everything done well at once
               work life.                                          results in nothing done well.




© 2012, HumanR                1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170                                  Page 5
Item            Item Rating    Net Progress     Verbatim Comment: What can be done to
                                          (1 to 5)     (-10 to 10)       make the organization an even better
                                                                                   place to work?
                                                                      This year . . . has brought disrespect to our
               I am satisfied with                                    business unit as well as outright inflammatory
               the level of                                           language and frustration/defensiveness on
               teamwork provided                                      collective conference calls etc. Corporate
               by others in the                                       finance office has lack of knowledge of their
Individual Y                                1               -9
               organization outside                                   accounting software and doesn't take advice
               of my immediate                                        from my 8 years of experience. Customer
               workgroup/                                             requests are being ignored, showing lack of
                                                                      responsiveness as well as outright disrespect for
               department.
                                                                      deadlines.
               Within the scope of                                    The bureaucracy is a constant obstacle to
               my job I have the                                      meeting customer needs - the workers are made
               appropriate level of                                   to support the bureaucrats rather than the other
Individual Z                                1               -8
               freedom to use my                                      way around. Among other things, this results in
               own judgment and                                       us having a ridiculously high overhead
               take action.                                           multiplier, which makes us cost-uncompetitive.


Barriers to Making Progress

We noted earlier the importance of +5 days of net progress, the point at which high engagement
becomes most prevalent among the engagement levels. We asked respondents to select five barriers
from a list of 25 that have the largest impact on their productivity. We then compared the results of
individuals with less than 5 days of net progress with individuals with greater than 5 days of net
progress. The following table shows those barriers that present the largest gap between each set of
individuals.

                                  Table 3: Key Barriers Preventing +5 Net Progress
                             % of Respondents Mentioning Barrier as an Issue
                                    Net Progress = +5 Days or More      Net Progress = Less Than +5 Days         Gap
                                                (n=2778)                           (n=3161)
Responding to crises                              9.5%                               20.2%                      10.7%
Lack of clear priorities/goals                    5.9%                               16.5%                      10.6%
Miscommunication among
                                                  9.2%                               18.1%                       8.9%
work groups/departments
Continual need to seek
decisions or approval from                        6.3%                               15.0%                       8.7%
higher authority
Lack of information                               11.7%                              20.3%                       8.6%

Consider the impact that these barriers impose on employees as they attempt to make progress in their
work and the high frequency in which they occur for individuals in our survey who make less than +5
days of Net Progress. To move employees into a net progress range where they are most likely to be
highly engaged, managers can focus on these barriers which impede desired levels of progress.




© 2012, HumanR                1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170                                   Page 6
The Disengaged

As stated previously, disengaged employees are difficult to motivate and can be harmful to morale. An
additional item of interest from the data shows the effect of increased perception of progress on the
disengaged population. Our findings show that regardless of their level of progress, the disengaged
population remains disengaged.

                                                                 Figure 2

                                                      Disengaged Population
                                      250
                Number of Employees




                                      200
                                      150
                                      100
                                      50
                                       0
                                            -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
                                                                   Net Progress




As seen in the chart above, no clear link exists between progress and disengagement. We actually see
more disengaged employees at +9 days of net progress than at -9 days of net progress. Disengaged
employees report dissatisfaction across a variety of factors, and our research has shown that this is
often due to poor person/job fit. Because progress likely has little effect on disengaged employees,
managers should instead focus on facilitating the progress of individuals who are already engaged.


Implications for Managers
Amabile and Kramer state that a positive inner work life drives performance, that performance is
dependent on making progress in meaningful work, which in turn, yields a positive inner work life. They
refer to this as the progress loop. According to Amabile and Kramer, one of the goals of managers in
creating a high performance work environment is to facilitate the progress loop.

Implications From Our Research

Our findings lead to some practical implications for managers to help them facilitate progress.

       Ask employees about progress and obstacles. But, as Amabile and Kramer note, check “in” on
        them, do not check “up” on them. Be seen as a facilitator of success, not a micromanager.
       Manage customer expectations. As noted in the findings, setting customer expectations
        correlates with net progress. A poorly written set of requirements, an underwhelming service

© 2012, HumanR                                1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170        Page 7
level agreement, or an inability to hold customers to what was agreed to at the outset of a
       project can result in rework, overwork, and a seemingly infinite cycle of frustration.
      Make work meaningful and rewarding to the employee. Work to match employee career and
       role expectations to work they are performing. Most people accept job offers based on their
       expectations of what the job will entail. When people find themselves in roles other than they
       expect, they may find the work less meaningful than that which they originally intended to
       pursue. This disconnect between expectations and roles can lead employees toward the
       perception that they are not making meaningful progress.
      Maximize autonomy whenever possible. Ensure employees feel they can make decisions that
       allow them to move forward without a burdensome approval process. Amabile and Kramer
       note that their model manager “checks in with,” and does not “check up on” his or her team.
       Our survey findings reveal, in both barriers and item ratings, the importance of empowerment
       as it relates to progress. From an employee perceiving that he or she must waste time while
       awaiting approval to an employee feeling demotivated by a perceived lack of responsibility, a
       lack of employee empowerment can stall progress.
      Promote teamwork among departments. Particularly in large, complex projects, teamwork
       among departments is crucial for moving forward effectively. Missed deadlines, overburdened
       team members, and a perception of inequitable workload are consequences of poor teamwork.
       Managers should advocate for their team and work with other departments’ management to
       ensure accountability and an equitable distribution of workload.
      Focus on what has been achieved. Engaging managers focus on positive outcomes rather than
       negatives. Focus on what has been done more than what has not been done to create an
       atmosphere conducive to rewarding progress.
      Set short term goals that are achievable. Think in terms of ten day increments. Long term
       projects can seem interminable, and progress can seem nonexistent. Ensure employees can
       identify when they have made progress by setting frequent, reachable targets.
      Ensure adequate resources to achieve goals. It is the manager’s responsibility to ensure that
       the time, money, equipment, and social and political capital are appropriately managed in a way
       that facilitates progress.
      Remember that some people will remain unsatisfied, regardless of progress. The disengaged
       will generally remain disengaged, regardless of a manager’s efforts to facilitate progress.
       Instead of spending resources to facilitate their progress, concentrate on those individuals who
       are already engaged.


Conclusion
HumanR’s research establishes a strong link between progress and engagement. To improve employee
engagement, managers should focus on creating an environment where each employee has the
opportunity to make progress in the work he or she finds meaningful. The goal is to build a progress-
oriented environment which results in higher levels of engagement, and ultimately, higher levels of
performance.


© 2012, HumanR             1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170                       Page 8
About HumanR
Founded in 1975, HumanR is a management consulting firm with a focus on organizational
development. Our goal is to help organizational leaders connect their people to their results – to
connect the dots between data and people, and between people and organizational performance.

Since 1996 we have had a presence on the web, performing employee engagement surveys and
providing customized 360s for leadership development. Over this period we have enhanced our services
by developing a variety of unique value adds, including our proprietary engagement index, our
normative databases, and our extensive selection of leadership and management trainings.

In 2009 HumanR was named the Woman Owned Small Business of the Year by the USDA’s Food and
Nutrition Service for our work in conducting 360 feedback and coaching.




If you have any questions about this white paper, please contact either:



Burgess Levin                        Mike McDermott, PhD                        Matt Evans
Senior Executive Consultant          Managing Principal, Talent Development     Senior Consultant
Blevin@humanr.com                    mmcdermott@humanr.com                      mevans@humanr.com
(703) 435-5911 x102                  (703)435-5911 x118                         (703) 435-5911 x114



© 2012, HumanR                1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170                         Page 9

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Engaged in what? So what? A role-based perspective for the future of employ...
Engaged in what?  So what?  A role-based perspective for the future of employ...Engaged in what?  So what?  A role-based perspective for the future of employ...
Engaged in what? So what? A role-based perspective for the future of employ...The University of Alabama
 
Employee Engagement - How to Achieve it
Employee Engagement - How to Achieve itEmployee Engagement - How to Achieve it
Employee Engagement - How to Achieve itKim Parker, CMA
 
Why you hate work ny times.com
Why you hate work   ny times.comWhy you hate work   ny times.com
Why you hate work ny times.comTed Gorczyca
 
Amplifying Employee Voice: Better Connect to the Pulse of your Workforce
Amplifying Employee Voice: Better Connect to the Pulse of your WorkforceAmplifying Employee Voice: Better Connect to the Pulse of your Workforce
Amplifying Employee Voice: Better Connect to the Pulse of your WorkforceCasey Lucas
 
OK_Engaging_the_Nonprofit_Workforce_Report
OK_Engaging_the_Nonprofit_Workforce_ReportOK_Engaging_the_Nonprofit_Workforce_Report
OK_Engaging_the_Nonprofit_Workforce_ReportPatricia Womack
 
How great leaders drive results through employee engagement
How great leaders drive results through employee engagementHow great leaders drive results through employee engagement
How great leaders drive results through employee engagementPetra Smith
 
Want to Kill Your Performance Rankings? Here’s How to Ensure Success
Want to Kill Your Performance Rankings? Here’s How to Ensure SuccessWant to Kill Your Performance Rankings? Here’s How to Ensure Success
Want to Kill Your Performance Rankings? Here’s How to Ensure SuccessStrategy&, a member of the PwC network
 
Employee Engagement 060512 Sbane Presentation
Employee Engagement 060512 Sbane PresentationEmployee Engagement 060512 Sbane Presentation
Employee Engagement 060512 Sbane PresentationKaryn White, PHR
 
Hudson IT Salary Survey 2013
Hudson IT Salary Survey 2013Hudson IT Salary Survey 2013
Hudson IT Salary Survey 2013Garyfay
 
Hudson 2013 IT Employee Insight & Salary guide
Hudson 2013 IT Employee Insight & Salary guideHudson 2013 IT Employee Insight & Salary guide
Hudson 2013 IT Employee Insight & Salary guideSteven Jagger
 
It salary guide 2013
It salary guide   2013It salary guide   2013
It salary guide 2013Garyfay
 
Hudson Salary Survey and Employment Insights 2013
Hudson Salary Survey and Employment Insights 2013Hudson Salary Survey and Employment Insights 2013
Hudson Salary Survey and Employment Insights 2013Mat Knutton
 
Talent Management Today - Jesus Guerro
Talent Management Today - Jesus GuerroTalent Management Today - Jesus Guerro
Talent Management Today - Jesus GuerroJesusGuerro
 
Best Companies Brochure
Best Companies BrochureBest Companies Brochure
Best Companies BrochureOllie Stokes
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

Engaged in what? So what? A role-based perspective for the future of employ...
Engaged in what?  So what?  A role-based perspective for the future of employ...Engaged in what?  So what?  A role-based perspective for the future of employ...
Engaged in what? So what? A role-based perspective for the future of employ...
 
WP EnablingEmployeeEngagement 160607
WP EnablingEmployeeEngagement 160607WP EnablingEmployeeEngagement 160607
WP EnablingEmployeeEngagement 160607
 
Employee Engagement - How to Achieve it
Employee Engagement - How to Achieve itEmployee Engagement - How to Achieve it
Employee Engagement - How to Achieve it
 
Why you hate work ny times.com
Why you hate work   ny times.comWhy you hate work   ny times.com
Why you hate work ny times.com
 
Amplifying Employee Voice: Better Connect to the Pulse of your Workforce
Amplifying Employee Voice: Better Connect to the Pulse of your WorkforceAmplifying Employee Voice: Better Connect to the Pulse of your Workforce
Amplifying Employee Voice: Better Connect to the Pulse of your Workforce
 
OK_Engaging_the_Nonprofit_Workforce_Report
OK_Engaging_the_Nonprofit_Workforce_ReportOK_Engaging_the_Nonprofit_Workforce_Report
OK_Engaging_the_Nonprofit_Workforce_Report
 
How great leaders drive results through employee engagement
How great leaders drive results through employee engagementHow great leaders drive results through employee engagement
How great leaders drive results through employee engagement
 
Want to Kill Your Performance Rankings? Here’s How to Ensure Success
Want to Kill Your Performance Rankings? Here’s How to Ensure SuccessWant to Kill Your Performance Rankings? Here’s How to Ensure Success
Want to Kill Your Performance Rankings? Here’s How to Ensure Success
 
2. PROJECT
2. PROJECT2. PROJECT
2. PROJECT
 
Employee Engagement 060512 Sbane Presentation
Employee Engagement 060512 Sbane PresentationEmployee Engagement 060512 Sbane Presentation
Employee Engagement 060512 Sbane Presentation
 
Hudson IT Salary Survey 2013
Hudson IT Salary Survey 2013Hudson IT Salary Survey 2013
Hudson IT Salary Survey 2013
 
It hudson-ol-f3
It hudson-ol-f3It hudson-ol-f3
It hudson-ol-f3
 
It salary guide 2013
It salary guide   2013It salary guide   2013
It salary guide 2013
 
Hudson 2013 IT Employee Insight & Salary guide
Hudson 2013 IT Employee Insight & Salary guideHudson 2013 IT Employee Insight & Salary guide
Hudson 2013 IT Employee Insight & Salary guide
 
It salary guide 2013
It salary guide   2013It salary guide   2013
It salary guide 2013
 
Hudson Salary Survey and Employment Insights 2013
Hudson Salary Survey and Employment Insights 2013Hudson Salary Survey and Employment Insights 2013
Hudson Salary Survey and Employment Insights 2013
 
Talent Management Today - Jesus Guerro
Talent Management Today - Jesus GuerroTalent Management Today - Jesus Guerro
Talent Management Today - Jesus Guerro
 
Solving business problems
Solving business problemsSolving business problems
Solving business problems
 
Best Companies Brochure
Best Companies BrochureBest Companies Brochure
Best Companies Brochure
 

Andere mochten auch

Hoveniersbedrijf Alexander Westland; bedrijfsbrochure
Hoveniersbedrijf Alexander Westland;  bedrijfsbrochureHoveniersbedrijf Alexander Westland;  bedrijfsbrochure
Hoveniersbedrijf Alexander Westland; bedrijfsbrochurevorstelijk
 
Offerfest concept
Offerfest conceptOfferfest concept
Offerfest conceptOfferFest
 
7 Steps to Warming Up a Cold List
7 Steps to Warming Up a Cold List7 Steps to Warming Up a Cold List
7 Steps to Warming Up a Cold ListEmail Delivered
 
Micaela scarcelli
Micaela scarcelliMicaela scarcelli
Micaela scarcellimicaelascar
 
Chapter4.5
Chapter4.5Chapter4.5
Chapter4.5nglaze10
 
Facebook advertising permissions explained - April 2013
Facebook advertising permissions explained - April 2013Facebook advertising permissions explained - April 2013
Facebook advertising permissions explained - April 2013Sven Hamberg
 
The life of famous people
The life of famous peopleThe life of famous people
The life of famous peopleBetplanas
 
ProfCat 2011:two - The Alternative Board
ProfCat 2011:two - The Alternative BoardProfCat 2011:two - The Alternative Board
ProfCat 2011:two - The Alternative BoardProfitability Catalyst
 
Customer Segmentation: How to ‘Profile’ Your Subscribers and Boost Email Camp...
Customer Segmentation: How to ‘Profile’ Your Subscribers and Boost Email Camp...Customer Segmentation: How to ‘Profile’ Your Subscribers and Boost Email Camp...
Customer Segmentation: How to ‘Profile’ Your Subscribers and Boost Email Camp...Email Delivered
 
Chapter 2.6
Chapter 2.6Chapter 2.6
Chapter 2.6nglaze10
 
Automated Deployment
Automated DeploymentAutomated Deployment
Automated Deploymentphpne
 
Pension pots and how to survive them
Pension pots and how to survive themPension pots and how to survive them
Pension pots and how to survive themILC- UK
 
Chapter4.4
Chapter4.4Chapter4.4
Chapter4.4nglaze10
 
Sca Financial Planner Benchmark Study 2010
Sca   Financial Planner Benchmark Study 2010Sca   Financial Planner Benchmark Study 2010
Sca Financial Planner Benchmark Study 2010Jason Pond
 
Επιπτώσεις των καταναλωτικών μας συνηθειών στην υγεία και το περιβάλλον
Επιπτώσεις των καταναλωτικών μας συνηθειών στην υγεία και το περιβάλλονΕπιπτώσεις των καταναλωτικών μας συνηθειών στην υγεία και το περιβάλλον
Επιπτώσεις των καταναλωτικών μας συνηθειών στην υγεία και το περιβάλλονepalkatoch
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Hoveniersbedrijf Alexander Westland; bedrijfsbrochure
Hoveniersbedrijf Alexander Westland;  bedrijfsbrochureHoveniersbedrijf Alexander Westland;  bedrijfsbrochure
Hoveniersbedrijf Alexander Westland; bedrijfsbrochure
 
Offerfest concept
Offerfest conceptOfferfest concept
Offerfest concept
 
listandtell
listandtelllistandtell
listandtell
 
7 Steps to Warming Up a Cold List
7 Steps to Warming Up a Cold List7 Steps to Warming Up a Cold List
7 Steps to Warming Up a Cold List
 
Micaela scarcelli
Micaela scarcelliMicaela scarcelli
Micaela scarcelli
 
Pizza
PizzaPizza
Pizza
 
Chapter4.5
Chapter4.5Chapter4.5
Chapter4.5
 
Facebook advertising permissions explained - April 2013
Facebook advertising permissions explained - April 2013Facebook advertising permissions explained - April 2013
Facebook advertising permissions explained - April 2013
 
Plan
PlanPlan
Plan
 
Flanders is a festival
Flanders is a festivalFlanders is a festival
Flanders is a festival
 
The life of famous people
The life of famous peopleThe life of famous people
The life of famous people
 
ProfCat 2011:two - The Alternative Board
ProfCat 2011:two - The Alternative BoardProfCat 2011:two - The Alternative Board
ProfCat 2011:two - The Alternative Board
 
Customer Segmentation: How to ‘Profile’ Your Subscribers and Boost Email Camp...
Customer Segmentation: How to ‘Profile’ Your Subscribers and Boost Email Camp...Customer Segmentation: How to ‘Profile’ Your Subscribers and Boost Email Camp...
Customer Segmentation: How to ‘Profile’ Your Subscribers and Boost Email Camp...
 
Meysemek
MeysemekMeysemek
Meysemek
 
Chapter 2.6
Chapter 2.6Chapter 2.6
Chapter 2.6
 
Automated Deployment
Automated DeploymentAutomated Deployment
Automated Deployment
 
Pension pots and how to survive them
Pension pots and how to survive themPension pots and how to survive them
Pension pots and how to survive them
 
Chapter4.4
Chapter4.4Chapter4.4
Chapter4.4
 
Sca Financial Planner Benchmark Study 2010
Sca   Financial Planner Benchmark Study 2010Sca   Financial Planner Benchmark Study 2010
Sca Financial Planner Benchmark Study 2010
 
Επιπτώσεις των καταναλωτικών μας συνηθειών στην υγεία και το περιβάλλον
Επιπτώσεις των καταναλωτικών μας συνηθειών στην υγεία και το περιβάλλονΕπιπτώσεις των καταναλωτικών μας συνηθειών στην υγεία και το περιβάλλον
Επιπτώσεις των καταναλωτικών μας συνηθειών στην υγεία και το περιβάλλον
 

Ähnlich wie Incremental Wins Exponential Impact

Employee Engagement
Employee EngagementEmployee Engagement
Employee Engagementguestbb5a23c
 
Workplace Accountability Study
Workplace Accountability StudyWorkplace Accountability Study
Workplace Accountability StudyMika Nurmesniemi
 
A Study Of The Effect Of Organization, Employees Opinion, Experience And Comm...
A Study Of The Effect Of Organization, Employees Opinion, Experience And Comm...A Study Of The Effect Of Organization, Employees Opinion, Experience And Comm...
A Study Of The Effect Of Organization, Employees Opinion, Experience And Comm...IOSR Journals
 
Relationship_between_job_satisfaction_and_organisational_performance.pdf
Relationship_between_job_satisfaction_and_organisational_performance.pdfRelationship_between_job_satisfaction_and_organisational_performance.pdf
Relationship_between_job_satisfaction_and_organisational_performance.pdfJawadAli902985
 
Theme 1 Job Performance What is it and what is considered good job.docx
Theme 1 Job Performance What is it and what is considered good job.docxTheme 1 Job Performance What is it and what is considered good job.docx
Theme 1 Job Performance What is it and what is considered good job.docxsusannr
 
The ROI of Effective Recognition
The ROI of Effective RecognitionThe ROI of Effective Recognition
The ROI of Effective RecognitionO.C. Tanner
 
DeNeve_Wellbeing at Work_OECD.pdf
DeNeve_Wellbeing at Work_OECD.pdfDeNeve_Wellbeing at Work_OECD.pdf
DeNeve_Wellbeing at Work_OECD.pdfStatsCommunications
 
Roi effectiverecognition-140423145812-phpapp01 (1)
Roi effectiverecognition-140423145812-phpapp01 (1)Roi effectiverecognition-140423145812-phpapp01 (1)
Roi effectiverecognition-140423145812-phpapp01 (1)Nitish Bhardwaj
 
Mercer: What's Working Research on Employee Engagement
Mercer: What's Working Research on Employee EngagementMercer: What's Working Research on Employee Engagement
Mercer: What's Working Research on Employee EngagementElizabeth Lupfer
 
Mercer: What's Working Research
Mercer: What's Working ResearchMercer: What's Working Research
Mercer: What's Working ResearchElizabeth Lupfer
 
Employee Engagement
Employee EngagementEmployee Engagement
Employee EngagementJay Kumar
 
Growth Innovation and High Performance: Employee Energy Story
Growth Innovation and High Performance:  Employee Energy StoryGrowth Innovation and High Performance:  Employee Energy Story
Growth Innovation and High Performance: Employee Energy StoryThe University of Alabama
 
Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold
Employee Engagement - Ryan GunholdEmployee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold
Employee Engagement - Ryan GunholdRyan Gunhold
 
Behaviors that Fuel Performance
Behaviors that Fuel PerformanceBehaviors that Fuel Performance
Behaviors that Fuel PerformancePlamen Petrov
 
Focusing on Employee Engagement: How to Measure and Improve It
Focusing on Employee Engagement: How to Measure and Improve ItFocusing on Employee Engagement: How to Measure and Improve It
Focusing on Employee Engagement: How to Measure and Improve ItKip Michael Kelly
 
Employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nigeria manufactur...
Employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nigeria manufactur...Employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nigeria manufactur...
Employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nigeria manufactur...Alexander Decker
 
A NEW ERA OF Employee Engagement (tham khao)
A NEW ERA OF Employee Engagement (tham khao)A NEW ERA OF Employee Engagement (tham khao)
A NEW ERA OF Employee Engagement (tham khao)nguyenanvuong2007
 
THE RISE OF THE ENGAGED EMPLOYEE
THE RISE OF THE ENGAGED EMPLOYEETHE RISE OF THE ENGAGED EMPLOYEE
THE RISE OF THE ENGAGED EMPLOYEEEngagement Hub
 
All Pro Disaster Cleaning, Road to Rejuvination
All Pro Disaster Cleaning, Road to RejuvinationAll Pro Disaster Cleaning, Road to Rejuvination
All Pro Disaster Cleaning, Road to RejuvinationJessalyn Rasmussen
 

Ähnlich wie Incremental Wins Exponential Impact (20)

Employee Engagement
Employee EngagementEmployee Engagement
Employee Engagement
 
Workplace Accountability Study
Workplace Accountability StudyWorkplace Accountability Study
Workplace Accountability Study
 
Employee engagement, involvmemnt and empowerment (keterlibatan dan pemberdaya...
Employee engagement, involvmemnt and empowerment (keterlibatan dan pemberdaya...Employee engagement, involvmemnt and empowerment (keterlibatan dan pemberdaya...
Employee engagement, involvmemnt and empowerment (keterlibatan dan pemberdaya...
 
A Study Of The Effect Of Organization, Employees Opinion, Experience And Comm...
A Study Of The Effect Of Organization, Employees Opinion, Experience And Comm...A Study Of The Effect Of Organization, Employees Opinion, Experience And Comm...
A Study Of The Effect Of Organization, Employees Opinion, Experience And Comm...
 
Relationship_between_job_satisfaction_and_organisational_performance.pdf
Relationship_between_job_satisfaction_and_organisational_performance.pdfRelationship_between_job_satisfaction_and_organisational_performance.pdf
Relationship_between_job_satisfaction_and_organisational_performance.pdf
 
Theme 1 Job Performance What is it and what is considered good job.docx
Theme 1 Job Performance What is it and what is considered good job.docxTheme 1 Job Performance What is it and what is considered good job.docx
Theme 1 Job Performance What is it and what is considered good job.docx
 
The ROI of Effective Recognition
The ROI of Effective RecognitionThe ROI of Effective Recognition
The ROI of Effective Recognition
 
DeNeve_Wellbeing at Work_OECD.pdf
DeNeve_Wellbeing at Work_OECD.pdfDeNeve_Wellbeing at Work_OECD.pdf
DeNeve_Wellbeing at Work_OECD.pdf
 
Roi effectiverecognition-140423145812-phpapp01 (1)
Roi effectiverecognition-140423145812-phpapp01 (1)Roi effectiverecognition-140423145812-phpapp01 (1)
Roi effectiverecognition-140423145812-phpapp01 (1)
 
Mercer: What's Working Research on Employee Engagement
Mercer: What's Working Research on Employee EngagementMercer: What's Working Research on Employee Engagement
Mercer: What's Working Research on Employee Engagement
 
Mercer: What's Working Research
Mercer: What's Working ResearchMercer: What's Working Research
Mercer: What's Working Research
 
Employee Engagement
Employee EngagementEmployee Engagement
Employee Engagement
 
Growth Innovation and High Performance: Employee Energy Story
Growth Innovation and High Performance:  Employee Energy StoryGrowth Innovation and High Performance:  Employee Energy Story
Growth Innovation and High Performance: Employee Energy Story
 
Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold
Employee Engagement - Ryan GunholdEmployee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold
Employee Engagement - Ryan Gunhold
 
Behaviors that Fuel Performance
Behaviors that Fuel PerformanceBehaviors that Fuel Performance
Behaviors that Fuel Performance
 
Focusing on Employee Engagement: How to Measure and Improve It
Focusing on Employee Engagement: How to Measure and Improve ItFocusing on Employee Engagement: How to Measure and Improve It
Focusing on Employee Engagement: How to Measure and Improve It
 
Employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nigeria manufactur...
Employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nigeria manufactur...Employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nigeria manufactur...
Employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment in nigeria manufactur...
 
A NEW ERA OF Employee Engagement (tham khao)
A NEW ERA OF Employee Engagement (tham khao)A NEW ERA OF Employee Engagement (tham khao)
A NEW ERA OF Employee Engagement (tham khao)
 
THE RISE OF THE ENGAGED EMPLOYEE
THE RISE OF THE ENGAGED EMPLOYEETHE RISE OF THE ENGAGED EMPLOYEE
THE RISE OF THE ENGAGED EMPLOYEE
 
All Pro Disaster Cleaning, Road to Rejuvination
All Pro Disaster Cleaning, Road to RejuvinationAll Pro Disaster Cleaning, Road to Rejuvination
All Pro Disaster Cleaning, Road to Rejuvination
 

Incremental Wins Exponential Impact

  • 1. Incremental Wins – Exponential Impact How Employee Progress Drives Employee Engagement Executive Summary In a Harvard Business Review article, “The Power of Small Wins,” Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer (2011) highlight how important it is for workers to feel as though they are making ‘progress’ on a frequent basis, noting that progress in meaningful work is a key driver of organizational performance 1. Using Amabile’s and Kramer’s work as a foundation, HumanR sought to explore two questions: 1. What is the link between employee progress and employee engagement? 2. How should managers target their efforts to promote employee progress? In 2011, HumanR conducted an engagement survey of sixteen organizations to better understand employee engagement. In addition to asking typical engagement questions on compensation, supervision, and recognition, we asked questions both on how often the employee makes progress and how often the employee encounters obstacles to better understand the link between engagement and progress. Based on the data from 6000 respondents, we found a strong link between employee perceptions of their daily progress at work and their level of engagement. The data also revealed key drivers of workplace progress as well as barriers inhibiting employees from making greater progress. Finally, the data also provided clear insights on actions that managers can take to better facilitate employee progress and ultimately improve engagement and performance. Introduction The impact of employee engagement on an organization is both well documented and striking. From less unplanned leave to greater profitability2, a highly-engaged cadre of employees delivers quantifiably better results to organizations of all types. Conversely, a disengaged workforce yields the opposite results. While compensation, buy-in to the organization’s mission, and other organization-level drivers are often the result of high-level organization-wide actions, the individual manager is pivotal to the level of engagement of his or her employees. As a result of their research, Amabile and Kramer (2011) were able to ferret out the difference between a “good day” and a “bad day” at work. “Good days” are days in which people “feel happy, are 1 Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer, “The Power of Small Wins,” Harvard Business Review May 2011: 71-80. 2 “Motivating Employees to Go the Extra Mile: The Manager’s Role in Engagement,” Tom Davenport and Steven Harding, Towers Watson, 2010. © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 1
  • 2. intrinsically motivated by the work itself, and have positive perceptions of their colleagues and the organization.” “Bad days” are those days when they experience “frustration, fear, and sadness.” Not surprisingly, Amabile and Kramer found that people are more likely to be creative and productive on “good days” than “bad days.” Amabile and Kramer also found the single largest predictor of a “good day” is whether or not employees made progress in their work – that is, they took steps forward in either their own work or in their team’s work. In fact, in 76% of days in which workers report leaving work in a good mood, they report that progress was made. However, on 67% of bad days, employees reported experiencing setbacks or obstacles. They further argue that “knowing what serves to catalyze and nourish progress – and what does the opposite – turns out to be the key to effectively managing people and their work.” In our research we found a strong link between the employee’s perceived level of progress and the employee’s level of engagement. Additionally, we identified key drivers and barriers to employee progress. Based on our findings, we make suggestions for managers to facilitate an engaging environment by enabling and supporting employee progress. Methodology As a part of HumanR’s ongoing engagement research, we surveyed sixteen organizations with over 6,000 respondents to further understand factors that influence employees’ engagement levels. HumanR asked employees to respond to items in several categories, including My Job, My Immediate Supervisor, Organization-Wide Leadership and Direction, Compensation and Benefits, etc. To examine how the contribution ‘progress’ plays in employee engagement, the survey asked employees to respond to items on barriers to productivity, and two questions related to progress and obstacles. Those questions were:  In a typical two-week period, I leave work feeling I have made progress on the following number of days (Employees could select any number from 0 through 10).  In a typical two-week period, I encounter obstacles to making progress on the following number of days (Employees could select any number from 0 through 10). The HumanR Engagement Index HumanR has studied employee engagement throughout the last decade, resulting in a proprietary Employee Engagement Index. The index yields an engagement score for each survey participant and allows us to group respondents as Highly Engaged, Engaged, or Disengaged:  Highly Engaged - Employees demonstrate an emotional commitment to the organization - they tend to be self-starters, to take on work that is not necessarily a part of their job, and to be loyal.  Engaged - Employees demonstrate a rational approach to the value of their job, continuing to commit for so long as it appears to be in their best interest. © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 2
  • 3. Disengaged - Employees are neither happy nor productive – but find it harder to leave their job than to stay – they tend to be cynical and to be harmful to morale. This survey sample resulted in the following engagement distribution, which fit within our existing normative data3:  45 percent (n=2,758) were Highly Engaged,  39 percent (n=2,375) were Engaged, and  17 percent (n=1,022) were Disengaged. Findings Linking Progress and Engagement As expected, the results indicate a strong relationship between engagement level and progress. The more days out of ten an individual reports making progress, the more likely he or she is to be highly engaged. Conversely, the more days out of ten an individual reports encountering obstacles, the more likely s/he is to score lower on engagement. We also combined progress and obstacles into a single measure, referred to hereafter as “Net Progress.” Net Progress is the difference between the number of days the survey respondent reports making progress and the number of days the survey respondent reports encountering obstacles. Figure 1 demonstrates the relationship between net progress and level of engagement. Figure 1 Net Progress and Engagement Level 1800 1600 1400 # of Respondents 1200 1000 800 Disengaged 600 Engaged 400 200 Highly Engaged 0 -5 and Less -4 to +4 +5 and Greater (n=246) (n=2909) (n=2774) Net Progress Range 3 HumanR’s historical normative ranges for engagement levels are: Disengaged: 6%-22%; Engaged: 32%-53%; Highly Engaged: 32%-61%. © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 3
  • 4. At the high end of Net Progress, i.e. +5 days or more, the number of employees who are highly engaged overtakes and passes the number of employees who are engaged. Managers, therefore, may wish to consider +5 Net Progress as a target. Approximately half of the survey population reports +5 Net Progress or greater, which indicates that in addition to being quantifiable and meaningful, this target is also attainable. Driving Net Progress As seen above, a relationship between net progress and engagement clearly exists. Delving deeper into the survey data, we found relationships between individual items and net progress. The five items most highly correlated to net progress are listed below: 1. At work my ideas and views seem to count. 2. The organization does a good job of setting customer expectations at the outset of an assignment. 3. I am able to maintain an effective balance between my personal life and my work life. 4. I am satisfied with the level of teamwork provided by others in the organization outside of my immediate workgroup/department. 5. Within the scope of my job I have the appropriate level of freedom to use my own judgment and take action. To better understand how these items might positively affect progress, consider these responses from five separate survey respondents who rated these items high. Note their verbatim responses and how they positively might affect one’s perception of progress. Table 1: Key Drivers and Representative Positive Comments Item Item Rating Net Progress Verbatim Comment: What can be done to (1 to 5) (-10 to 10) make the organization an even better place to work? At work my ideas Willingness to listen to new ideas and a culture Individual A and views seem to 5 6 that promotes innovation in processes 'working count. smarter, not harder.’ The work is challenging and enjoyable. My The organization supervisor is excellent to work for and ensures I does a good job of have the tools I need to succeed. My customer setting customer has placed a high priority on getting the job Individual B 5 9 done, but is reasonable in their expectations. At expectations at the outset of an this point, I am enjoying my job tremendously assignment. and don't expect anything to change in terms of my feelings with regard to this situation. I had a work-life balance issue emerge this year I am able to that required me to adjust my schedule and maintain an responsibilities and I have been fully supported in this. I have never had a hint of worry that if I effective balance Individual C 5 6 ask for more flexibility I would put my between my employment in jeopardy. This has motivated me personal life and my to make sure I work extra hard so that the work life. company knows that this decision to support me was a good one. © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 4
  • 5. Item Item Rating Net Progress Verbatim Comment: What can be done to (1 to 5) (-10 to 10) make the organization an even better place to work? I am satisfied with the level of teamwork provided I enjoy the collaboration between the project managers, instructional designers, artists, by others in the Individual D 5 6 programmers, and QA specialists. I also like the organization outside relaxed work environment and how we pitch in of my immediate when other artists are swamped with work. workgroup/ department. The autonomy to do my job and the support I Within the scope of receive to provide excellent service to our client my job I have the units. I feel my supervisor's beliefs are in line with mine in regards to providing assistance appropriate level of Individual E 5 9 beyond our sample data collection mission. For freedom to use my instance, I am free and encouraged to provide own judgment and expertise to clients that not only makes our take action. services more valuable but also improves the unit. Now, consider the negative effect these items can have on progress. Note how these individuals’ negative responses related to these items might negatively affect their perception of their progress. Table 2: Key Drivers and Representative Negative Comments Item Item Rating Net Progress Verbatim Comment: What can be done to (1 to 5) (-10 to 10) make the organization an even better place to work? Address concerns and desires that are identified At work my ideas by the employee . . . overall, this organization Individual V and views seem to 2 -4 has become the single most dissatisfying, count. disheartening, and demotivating workplace that I have ever experienced. The organization In my experience the management of my does a good job of organization promises many things to the client and then does not provide the resources or setting customer Individual W 2 -2 managerial support to get them done, which expectations at the means that we are always behind schedule and outset of an under budget and cutting corners. This leads to assignment. a high stress work environment. I am able to People do not take ownership of their maintain an responsibilities, thus making others take on more than they should. Some people get to go effective balance Individual X 2 -6 home on time, the rest struggle to keep the boat between my afloat for the good of all. Management's role in personal life and my trying to get everything done well at once work life. results in nothing done well. © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 5
  • 6. Item Item Rating Net Progress Verbatim Comment: What can be done to (1 to 5) (-10 to 10) make the organization an even better place to work? This year . . . has brought disrespect to our I am satisfied with business unit as well as outright inflammatory the level of language and frustration/defensiveness on teamwork provided collective conference calls etc. Corporate by others in the finance office has lack of knowledge of their Individual Y 1 -9 organization outside accounting software and doesn't take advice of my immediate from my 8 years of experience. Customer workgroup/ requests are being ignored, showing lack of responsiveness as well as outright disrespect for department. deadlines. Within the scope of The bureaucracy is a constant obstacle to my job I have the meeting customer needs - the workers are made appropriate level of to support the bureaucrats rather than the other Individual Z 1 -8 freedom to use my way around. Among other things, this results in own judgment and us having a ridiculously high overhead take action. multiplier, which makes us cost-uncompetitive. Barriers to Making Progress We noted earlier the importance of +5 days of net progress, the point at which high engagement becomes most prevalent among the engagement levels. We asked respondents to select five barriers from a list of 25 that have the largest impact on their productivity. We then compared the results of individuals with less than 5 days of net progress with individuals with greater than 5 days of net progress. The following table shows those barriers that present the largest gap between each set of individuals. Table 3: Key Barriers Preventing +5 Net Progress % of Respondents Mentioning Barrier as an Issue Net Progress = +5 Days or More Net Progress = Less Than +5 Days Gap (n=2778) (n=3161) Responding to crises 9.5% 20.2% 10.7% Lack of clear priorities/goals 5.9% 16.5% 10.6% Miscommunication among 9.2% 18.1% 8.9% work groups/departments Continual need to seek decisions or approval from 6.3% 15.0% 8.7% higher authority Lack of information 11.7% 20.3% 8.6% Consider the impact that these barriers impose on employees as they attempt to make progress in their work and the high frequency in which they occur for individuals in our survey who make less than +5 days of Net Progress. To move employees into a net progress range where they are most likely to be highly engaged, managers can focus on these barriers which impede desired levels of progress. © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 6
  • 7. The Disengaged As stated previously, disengaged employees are difficult to motivate and can be harmful to morale. An additional item of interest from the data shows the effect of increased perception of progress on the disengaged population. Our findings show that regardless of their level of progress, the disengaged population remains disengaged. Figure 2 Disengaged Population 250 Number of Employees 200 150 100 50 0 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Net Progress As seen in the chart above, no clear link exists between progress and disengagement. We actually see more disengaged employees at +9 days of net progress than at -9 days of net progress. Disengaged employees report dissatisfaction across a variety of factors, and our research has shown that this is often due to poor person/job fit. Because progress likely has little effect on disengaged employees, managers should instead focus on facilitating the progress of individuals who are already engaged. Implications for Managers Amabile and Kramer state that a positive inner work life drives performance, that performance is dependent on making progress in meaningful work, which in turn, yields a positive inner work life. They refer to this as the progress loop. According to Amabile and Kramer, one of the goals of managers in creating a high performance work environment is to facilitate the progress loop. Implications From Our Research Our findings lead to some practical implications for managers to help them facilitate progress.  Ask employees about progress and obstacles. But, as Amabile and Kramer note, check “in” on them, do not check “up” on them. Be seen as a facilitator of success, not a micromanager.  Manage customer expectations. As noted in the findings, setting customer expectations correlates with net progress. A poorly written set of requirements, an underwhelming service © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 7
  • 8. level agreement, or an inability to hold customers to what was agreed to at the outset of a project can result in rework, overwork, and a seemingly infinite cycle of frustration.  Make work meaningful and rewarding to the employee. Work to match employee career and role expectations to work they are performing. Most people accept job offers based on their expectations of what the job will entail. When people find themselves in roles other than they expect, they may find the work less meaningful than that which they originally intended to pursue. This disconnect between expectations and roles can lead employees toward the perception that they are not making meaningful progress.  Maximize autonomy whenever possible. Ensure employees feel they can make decisions that allow them to move forward without a burdensome approval process. Amabile and Kramer note that their model manager “checks in with,” and does not “check up on” his or her team. Our survey findings reveal, in both barriers and item ratings, the importance of empowerment as it relates to progress. From an employee perceiving that he or she must waste time while awaiting approval to an employee feeling demotivated by a perceived lack of responsibility, a lack of employee empowerment can stall progress.  Promote teamwork among departments. Particularly in large, complex projects, teamwork among departments is crucial for moving forward effectively. Missed deadlines, overburdened team members, and a perception of inequitable workload are consequences of poor teamwork. Managers should advocate for their team and work with other departments’ management to ensure accountability and an equitable distribution of workload.  Focus on what has been achieved. Engaging managers focus on positive outcomes rather than negatives. Focus on what has been done more than what has not been done to create an atmosphere conducive to rewarding progress.  Set short term goals that are achievable. Think in terms of ten day increments. Long term projects can seem interminable, and progress can seem nonexistent. Ensure employees can identify when they have made progress by setting frequent, reachable targets.  Ensure adequate resources to achieve goals. It is the manager’s responsibility to ensure that the time, money, equipment, and social and political capital are appropriately managed in a way that facilitates progress.  Remember that some people will remain unsatisfied, regardless of progress. The disengaged will generally remain disengaged, regardless of a manager’s efforts to facilitate progress. Instead of spending resources to facilitate their progress, concentrate on those individuals who are already engaged. Conclusion HumanR’s research establishes a strong link between progress and engagement. To improve employee engagement, managers should focus on creating an environment where each employee has the opportunity to make progress in the work he or she finds meaningful. The goal is to build a progress- oriented environment which results in higher levels of engagement, and ultimately, higher levels of performance. © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 8
  • 9. About HumanR Founded in 1975, HumanR is a management consulting firm with a focus on organizational development. Our goal is to help organizational leaders connect their people to their results – to connect the dots between data and people, and between people and organizational performance. Since 1996 we have had a presence on the web, performing employee engagement surveys and providing customized 360s for leadership development. Over this period we have enhanced our services by developing a variety of unique value adds, including our proprietary engagement index, our normative databases, and our extensive selection of leadership and management trainings. In 2009 HumanR was named the Woman Owned Small Business of the Year by the USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service for our work in conducting 360 feedback and coaching. If you have any questions about this white paper, please contact either: Burgess Levin Mike McDermott, PhD Matt Evans Senior Executive Consultant Managing Principal, Talent Development Senior Consultant Blevin@humanr.com mmcdermott@humanr.com mevans@humanr.com (703) 435-5911 x102 (703)435-5911 x118 (703) 435-5911 x114 © 2012, HumanR 1031 Sterling Road, STE 203, Herndon, VA 20170 Page 9