Weitere Ă€hnliche Inhalte Ăhnlich wie Sap Insider Webinar With Deloitte 10dec09 Final (20) KĂŒrzlich hochgeladen (20) Sap Insider Webinar With Deloitte 10dec09 Final1. XBRL is coming
Is your company ready?
Scott Rosenfelder
Director - AERS Technology & Knowledge Management, Deloitte & Touche LLP
Philip Mugglestone
Director - Solution Marketing, SAP
Jennifer Maddox
Director - Solution Marketing, SAP
December 10, 2009
2. Agenda
1. The impact of XBRL on group financial reporting
2. Overview of SAPÂź BusinessObjectsâą XBRL Publishing by UBmatrix
3. Demonstration
4. Summary and next steps
© SAP 2009 / Page 2
3. Agenda
1. The impact of XBRL on group financial reporting
2. Overview of SAPÂź BusinessObjectsâą XBRL Publishing by UBmatrix
3. Demonstration
4. Summary and next steps
© SAP 2009 / Page 3
4. XBRL Basics
XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) is a
language for electronically communicating business and
financial data
âą Based on XML, a widely-used Internet standard
âą Uses standardized âtagsâ that correspond to concepts and
information included in financial reports
âą Facilitates automated retrieval and analysis of financial data
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
5. The Benefits of XBRL in a data world
Improves efficiency and reduces cost of data collection and analysis
âą Move from static, text-based data to âinteractive dataâ that can be
dynamically searched and analyzed
âą Reduces or eliminates error-prone manual data entry
âą Enables high value analysis of data vs. low value compilation of
data
Simplifies comparison of financial and business performance across
companies, reporting periods and industries
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
6. Benefits of XBRL in business reporting
Common goals of many corporate finance functions map directly to the potential
benefits of XBRL which companies may consider leveraging for their business
reporting processes
Common goals for a corporate
finance function:
âą Reduced costs Potential XBRL benefits
âą Cost savings, efficiency, and
âą Stronger internal controls
improved accuracy and reliability
âą Timely and accurate data âą Transparency
âą Standardized systems, business âą Enhanced business reporting
processes and data elements and standardization
âą Seamless data exchange âą Paperless environment
between business units âą SOA architecture for
interoperability
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
7. The SEC Mandate
The SEC published rules requiring the use interactive data to
improve financial reporting on April 13th, 2009
Highlights of the ruling:
âą Require most registrants to submit XBRL-formatted financial reports and
schedules as an exhibit
âą Requirement is phased-in over three years, with largest registrants
having to provide interactive data in filings for periods ending on or after
June 15, 2009
âą 30-day grace period for each initial filing of interactive data
âą For most registrants, the first XBRL filing will be 10-Q, 20-F or 40-F
â Registrants do not have to start with the 10-K
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
8. Then SEC Phase in Timeline
Registrant Category Effective Date
Large accelerated filers
âą Domestic and foreign
YEAR 1 âą Filing using U.S. GAAP, and Periods ending on or after
âą Having a public float> June 15, 2009
$5 billion
Large accelerated filers
âą Domestic and foreign
âą Filing using U.S. GAAP, and Periods ending on or after
YEAR 2 âą Having a public float between June 15, 2010
$700 million and $5 billion
Most other registrants including
âą Smaller companies filing using Periods ending on or after
YEAR 3 U.S. GAAP
June 15, 2011
âą Foreign private issuers
reporting using IFRS
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
9. Some Filing results so far and challenges aheadâŠ
âą FY ending 6/15/2009
â Mandated Participants - Public companies using US-GAAP ("accelerated filers") with >$5B
market capitalization
â Result - 427 companies - 871 10-Q filings so far
âą FY ending 6/15/2010
â Mandated Participants - All other "large accelerated filersâ using US-GAAP
â Expected Result â an additional 1500-2000 companies
âą FY ending 6/15/2011 and thereafter
â Mandated Participants - All public companies, including âforeign private issuersâ using
either IFRS or US-GAAP
â Expected Result â an additional 10,000 companies
âą Mandate on Tagging Detail
â FS footnotes and schedules initially tagged individually as a block of text
â After a year of this, filers also required to tag the detailed quantitative disclosures
â Estimated impact â 15X to 20X increase on the number of tagged data elements
(and size of filing)
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
10. Challenges seen today
âą Accounting is the most critical skill even though XBRL is a computer
language
â Identifying the appropriate tag is the most critical step which can be
challenging due to the voluminous nature of the US GAAP taxonomies
â There is a lack of guidance on tagging decisions and whether or not to create
an extension
â The SEC has also included over 200 technical rules in the EDGAR Filer
Manual (EFM) on XBRL filings
âą Experience and lessons learned from first round of filers indicated the
significant needs for registrants to perform their due diligence on XBRL
filings instead of completely relying on filing agents for tagging decisions
and accuracy
â Potential lack of reviews and validations resulted in errors in XBRL filings
â Companies working with certain service providers are only reviewing Excel
deliverables not the XBRL submissions
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
11. Challenges seen in the process so far
Process Errors noted and/or feedback Key lessons learned
Mapping âą There is a lack of guidance around the mapping process for âą Mapping requires the most judgment
element selection and element extensions
âą Element selection
âą Expected challenges with year two detailed footnotes mapping
âą Extension creation - EDGAR Filer
Manual requirements, Leading
practices
âą Use of correct version of taxonomy
Extending âą Custom element created âą Custom extensions limit comparability
âą When a core element exists
âą When a customized label would suffice âą The creation of an incorrect linkbase
can have serious ripple effect
âą Lack of customized label on correctly mapped core element consequences through the XBRL
documents
âą Incorrect presentation/calculation information in extension
linkbases
Tagging âą Incorrect data entry âą Errors in tagging result in incorrect
âą Tagging incorrect amounts, duplicate tagging, omission of data flowing to financial data
data from the tagging, etc. consumers
âą Data attribute errors
âą Decimals â rounding errors âą Some tagging issues may be attributed
âą Signs - Data entered with improper sign to the software tools used
âą Context errors
âą Duplicate/unused contexts âą Reviewed and updated methodology to
âą Complexity of detailed footnote tagging and rendering adapt to the year two challenge
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
12. XBRL - The Bigger Picture
XBRL can be leveraged to add value beyond financial reporting
âą Enhancing data quality and transparency
âą Facilitating more effective and timely business decisions
âą Streamlining business reporting processes and resources
The SEC is seeking to leverage XBRL in a range of additional areas in
addition to corporate financial reporting, including:
âą The disclosure of key mutual fund information
âą Certain reporting by credit rating agencies to be migrated to an XBRL format
âą XBRL as an enabling component of the SEC new IDEA reporting platform
âą Application of XBRL for reporting related to asset backed securities and the credit
market
XBRL is being leveraged more in qualitative reporting, such as ecological
impact reporting
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
13. XBRL - The Bigger Picture
XBRL is part of a larger trend towards convergence and
globalization of reporting standards
âą International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
â The IASB has released an expanded IFRS XBRL Taxonomy
âą It is expected to support the broad adoption of XBRL for IFRS based reporting
âą International Coordination
â The SEC, IASB, and JFSA are taking steps to align their XBRL initiatives and taxonomy
development efforts
âą National e-Government XBRL Initiatives
â Momentum is building around large scale ânationalâ XBRL projects
âą Australiaâs Standard Business Reporting (SBR) project
âą The Netherlands National Taxonomy Project (NTP)
âą These projects aim to improve efficiency and reduce costs borne by companies and governments
â Exchanges, regulators, and government agency activities
âą Canada, Korea, the UK and China
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
14. XBRL - Moving Forward on XBRL
Start taking steps to move forward on XBRL now
âą Obtain understanding of XBRL and the new US GAAP Taxonomy
âą Understand where your company falls in the SECâs phase-in plan for
XBRL-based financial reporting
âą Get connected to the decisions being made around the implementation of
XBRL reporting tools and processes
âą Establish a plan for financial reporting teams and IT groups involvement in
defining a sustainable process for converting and furnishing XBRL
financials
© 2009 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
15. Agenda
1. The impact of XBRL on group financial reporting
2. Overview of SAPÂź BusinessObjectsâą XBRL Publishing by UBmatrix
3. Demonstration
4. Summary and next steps
© SAP 2009 / Page 15
16. SAP BusinessObjects XBRL Publishing by UBmatrix
Streamlining XBRL publishing for business users
Speed
Quickly navigate taxonomies and map data
Easy to use drag-and-drop mapping environment
Fast, thorough validation of generated XBRL
documents
Simplicity
Works with EPM solutions and SAP Business Suite
Link to and import disclosures stored in Microsoft Word
Insulates users from dealing with complex XBRL syntax
Flexibility
Easily extend published XBRL taxonomies
Complies with the XBRL 2.1 specification
Supports basic and blockâtext footnotes, dimensions,
and business rules
© SAP 2009 / Page 16
17. Speed
Quickly navigate taxonomies and map data
Taxonomies can be large and complex
containing thousands of elements
During mapping, search and filter dialogs A
allow business users to quickly navigate variety
of
the selected taxonomy useful
search
Browse the hierarchy
options
Full and partial search of taxonomy
concepts and labels with smart filtering
Separate views to display presentation,
calculations, and definition
Element detail view helps confirm match
Synchronized views help users locate
financial elements
Search results automatically interact
with the hierarchy tree
© SAP 2009 / Page 17
18. Speed
Easy to use drag-and-drop mapping environment
Rapid and re-usable mapping
of financial statements and
other Excel-based reports
Drag-and-drop to map:
Concepts
Contexts
Units (monetary, shares, etc.)
Reports can be refreshed
SalesRevenueNetGoods
without having to re-map
Map once
Re-use often
© SAP 2009 / Page 18
19. Speed
Fast, thorough validation of generated XBRL documents
Validation encompasses both syntax
and semantics
Appropriate numeric values
Does the Balance Sheet balance?
Reports ensure the mapping process
is complete, highlight inconsistencies,
and ensure compliance
Incomplete Mappings Report identifies
partially mapped cells
Calculation Trace Report helps diagnose
errors and inconsistencies by viewing
what was found versus what was
expected
Full Mappings Report provides a
comprehensive list of mappings
© SAP 2009 / Page 19
20. Simplicity
Works with EPM solutions and SAP Business Suite software
SAP-approved XBRL reporting tool
thatâs integrated with our financial
consolidation applications and SAP
Business Suite
SAP BusinessObjects Planning
and Consolidation
SAP BusinessObjects Financial
Consolidation
SAP Business Suite (including
SEM-BCS)
Via a common user interface
Microsoft Excel
© SAP 2009 / Page 20
21. Simplicity
Link to and import disclosures stored in Microsoft Word documents
Disclosures are a key part of financial
and compliance reporting
Financial table footnotes
Management discussion & analysis
Required by the U.S. SEC
Many organizations author this content
in Microsoft Word
Ability to attach Word documents and
reference content from each document
This approach offers the best of both
worlds
Leaves financial report authoring in a
friendly Excel environment
Narrative can be authored using Word
© SAP 2009 / Page 21
22. Simplicity
Insulates business users from having to deal with complex XBRL syntax
XBRL syntax is complex and
not business user-friendly
Comprehensive user interface
avoids the need for business
users to work directly with
XBRL syntax
XBRL instance documents are
created by the application
© SAP 2009 / Page 22
23. Flexibility
Easily extend published XBRL taxonomies
Many organizations wish to extend their
XBRL reporting beyond the standard
taxonomies
Provide extra information to investors to
help differentiate from competitors
Design and extend XBRL taxonomies
using simple drag-and-drop editing
functions
Business rules editor
Define relationships across extended links
and link base types
Many of the world's XBRL taxonomies
have been modeled with the application
IFRS, US GAAP, UK GAAP, FINREP
Belgium, KOSDAQ, CRAS etc.
© SAP 2009 / Page 23
24. Flexibility
Complies with the XBRL 2.1 specification
Full compliance with the latest XBRL
standards
XBRL 2.1
Dimensions 1.0 (XBRL.org candidate
recommendation)
Dimensions Aggregation 1.0 (XBRL.org
public working draft)
XBRL Formulas 1.0 (working draft)
Financial Reporting Taxonomy
Architecture (FRTA) 1.0
Financial Reporting Instance Standards
(FRIS) 1.0 (XBRL.org public working
draft)
Supports any taxonomy in use today
© SAP 2009 / Page 24
25. Flexibility
Supports basic and blockâtext footnotes, dimensions, and business rules
Basic and blockâtext footnotes
Userâfriendly method of capturing both
plain text and blockâtext/HTML (or
formatted) XBRL footnotes
Footnotes can be reused multiple times
Multiple footnotes can be associated
to a given reporting element
Dimensional taxonomies, instance
documents, and aggregation
Business Rules
Supports XBRL Formula 1.0 and
Function 1.0 specifications
Can specify formula expressions either
in Excel-styled syntax or in the 2005
Draft XBRL Formula 1.0 syntax
© SAP 2009 / Page 25
26. Agenda
1. The impact of XBRL on group financial reporting
2. Overview of SAPÂź BusinessObjectsâą XBRL Publishing by UBmatrix
3. Demonstration
4. Summary and next steps
© SAP 2009 / Page 26
82. Agenda
1. The impact of XBRL on group financial reporting
2. Overview of SAPÂź BusinessObjectsâą XBRL Publishing by UBmatrix
3. Demonstration
4. Summary and next steps
© SAP 2009 / Page 82
83. Summary
Benefits
Saves time and money
Speed
Quickly navigate taxonomies and map data Faster and easier to create
Easy to use drag-and-drop mapping environment financial statements suitable for
Fast, thorough validation of generated XBRL documents electronic submission to
regulators
Confidence and compliance
Simplicity
Works with EPM solutions and SAP Business Suite Ensures filings are accurate,
complete, and meet all current
Link to and import disclosures stored in Microsoft Word
regulatory requirements.
Insulates users from dealing with complex XBRL syntax Enables faster and more
accurate audits at lower cost
Supports the âlast mileâ of
Flexibility finance
Easily extend published XBRL taxonomies
Complies with the XBRL 2.1 specification Streamlines consolidation,
Supports basic and blockâtext footnotes, dimensions, and reporting, and publishing
business rules processes without sacrificing
data quality
© SAP 2009 / Page 83
84. Next steps
See www.sap.com/epm for:
Solution briefs
Streamlining XBRL publishing for business users
Accelerating the financial closing process
Optimizing the Transition to IFRS
Efficient Business Planning and Consolidation
Financial consolidation and reporting
Financial information management
Peer-to-peer intercompany reconciliation
White papers
The Financial Close - Optimizing Performance and
Driving Financial Excellence
Improving Intercompany Reconciliation for a
Faster Close
Streamlining Your Conversion to IFRS
Recorded demos
Streamlining XBRL Publishing for Business Users
Accelerated Group Financial Close
© SAP 2009 / Page 84
85. Questions
Questions
How to contact us
Scott Rosenfelder Philip Mugglestone Jennifer Maddox
srosenfelder@deloitte.com philip.mugglestone@sap.com Jennifer.maddox@sap.com
© SAP 2009 / Page 85