Marco’s presentation will shift the focus from health workers to the potential recipients of mobile-phone-based health services. Focusing on upstream elements of mHealth, Marco will explore patterns of mobile phone use and healthcare-seeking behaviour, drawing on fieldwork insights from rural India (Rajasthan) and China (Gansu). The evidence suggests that common assumptions of mHealth proponents are easily violated; that is, mobile phone ownership is not ubiquitous and does not necessarily reflect mobile phone use, people do not necessarily share mobile phones freely amongst each other, they are not necessarily keen and excited technological learners, and they do develop mobile phone-aided coping strategies that may compete with mhealth. While both contexts offer, at least in theory, the potential for mobile technology to break boundaries, the presentation will emphasise the importance of understanding upstream factors of mHealth before deploying technological solutions in order to provide effective solutions and to avoid the potential exacerbation of healthcare inequities.
Persistent Boundaries (Or why we should be aware of our assumptions in ICT4D)
1. OXFORD DEPARTMENT OF
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Persistent Boundaries
(Or why we should
be aware of our
assumptions in ICT4D)
Breaking Boundaries: ICT for Development
Department of Education
Marco Haenssgen
Oxford Department of Int„l Development
13 March 2014
3. Background
Common Assumptions About End-User Oriented mHealth
Academics and professionals hope to revolutionise healthcare access
through mobile health technology.
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 3
“Text messaging demonstrates
strong potential as a tool for health
care improvement.” (Cole-Lewis &
Kershaw, 2010:3)
4. Background
Common Assumptions About End-User Oriented mHealth
mHelath proponents’ narratives often (over-)emphasises the potential
of technology to revolutionise healthcare.
Technology excites (as it excites us)
(Almost) universal phone ownership
Sharing and lending where there are no phones
The underlying technological platform is neutral
People have a demand for mobile health services
They will have a positive effect on people‟s access to healthcare
Inequities between urban and rural areas will decrease
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 4
Euromonitor International
(2012, 2013)
6. Evidence
Sample characteristics
Qualitative data has been gathered from a high-
variance sample in rural Rajasthan and Gansu.
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 6
Adapted from Google Inc.
(2014)
7. Evidence
Ownership
Phone ownership is widespread, but penetration is larger in
China, especially among older population. Smartphones are rare.
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 7
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
18-24 25-39 40-54 55+ Male Female
No.ofRespondents(VillageResidents)
Phone Ownership Among Respondents, by Age Group and Gender
Phone No Phone Age Group Gender
India(n=89)China(n=89)
8. Evidence
Use
Mobile phone use is highly variable in rural Rajasthan and Gansu.
Dominant use of voice communication
Usability limitations especially from middle-aged upwards
Active vs. passive use
Lending restricted to important purposes
Learning (teaching) restricted to fundamental functions
Phone use can be beneficial as well as detrimental
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 8
9. Evidence
Use
Illustrations from the field: Use of phone features
Which mobile phone functions do you use?
I don’t know any. I just press the “OK” button to receive calls, but I can’t dial
numbers. So whenever I want to a make call, my son helps me. Whatever text
messages I receive, they are all invisible for me because I don’t know about them and
I never see them.
(woman aged 45, phone owner, in Rajasthani village)
[Woman] Generally, I take and make calls, and SMS sometimes. The people whom
I contact are relatives and children, to convey holidays greetings or to say hello
sometimes. I can’t use other functions of the phone. I do use the phonebook, but not
the pictures, I can’t use that. I also can’t use the camera.
[Man] I can’t use phones with more functions – the fewer functions, the better.
(married couple, woman aged 42 and man aged 45, phone owners, in Gansu village)
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 9
10. Evidence
Use
Illustrations from the field: Sharing, but limited use of phone features
Have you ever used the phone of your sons?
[…] We don’t know how to use the mobile, we only know that when someone calls, we
put phone near the ear so the sound comes from other side. We can listen to it and
when we say something, the other side can listen as well to the sound [of our voice].
We all know how to receive phone calls, this has been taught to us by our sons.
They said to receive phone calls, there is a green button on the right side [of the
phone keyboard], so when phone rings, we have to press it.
Do you feel comfortable when using the phone?
[…] I am afraid to use the phone, so I only take it when it’s needed, and
[afterwards] immediately hand it over to my son – if I accidentally press the wrong
button, I will cause money loss.
(focus group, older men aged 55 and 60, non-owners, in Rajasthani village)
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 10
11. Evidence
Use
Illustrations from the field: Limits to teaching
Have you ever taught your parents how to use the mobile phone?
Yes, we taught them how to make and receive calls, how to send text messages.
Do your parents understand these basic feature at the first attempt?
No, we have to teach them 5-6 times.
Are they were confident after they learned these features, or do they still feel hesitant
to operate their phones?
No, they are usually scared of wasted balance, which is why they don't use the
phone unnecessarily.
(3 young male respondents aged 18, 20, 22 in Rajasthani village, owners)
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 11
12. Evidence
Healthcare seeking
If people are able to access and use the mobile phone, it can become
part of their strategies to navigate the healthcare system.
Phones enter healthcare seeking where feasible and deemed necessary
Access
Assistance
Appointments
Assurance
Advice
But facilitation does not follow automatically
Elderly people
Restricted social networks
Savvy vs. basic use
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 12
13. Evidence
Healthcare seeking
Illustrations from the field: Facilitating healthcare access
Which kind of emergency happened did you encounter and how did you use the
mobile phone?
Recently my father and I had an accident but we couldn’t make a call because our
phone didn’t have reception. So we received help from another person to call the
ambulance and finally we could reach the hospital. There we could call to our home
and inform our family about the accident.
When you go to the hospital, do you call there first?
First I give a call to the doctor and ask whether he is available or not.
(man aged 22, owner, in Rajasthani village close to town)
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 13
14. Evidence
Healthcare seeking
Illustrations from the field: Facilitating healthcare access (non-owner)
How do you make calls in emergencies?
I call from my neighbours’ mobile phone.
[…] Did you get ill recently, and what did you do then?
Last Diwali, I suffered from a very bad fever. I called my mother so that she would
take me to the hospital.
Did the mobile phone play role in this process?
Yes, it made this easy. If I didn’t have the phone, then definitely I would have had to
take help from my neighbours.
How far do your parents live from here?
2-3 hours from here by bus.
(woman aged 28, non-owner, in Rajasthani village)
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 14
15. Evidence
Healthcare seeking
Illustrations from the field: No facilitating role of the phone
Who takes care of you when you are ill?
Myself. And I wouldn’t go to hospital. I have some common medicines at home
or I get some from the pharmacy in [the district capital of] Huining. We have 2 buses
to Huining in the morning, going back in the afternoon. It takes 1 hour to Huining and
costs 12 yuan [GBP 1.30]. If it’s a common cold, I take some drugs that help, I do not
go to the hospital.
(woman aged 51, phone owner, in Gansu village)
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 15
16. Evidence
Healthcare seeking
Illustrations from the field: Summoning assistance
How long does it normally take you to go to village hospital?
40 minutes if you walk there. Or you can call the village doctor to come here, he can
come here by motorcycle in 20 minutes. […] He comes here almost everyday, and
he comes to whoever calls him […]. Almost all people have the village doctor's
phone number.
Are there people who do not have the number, who would go to the neighbours and
ask for the number or borrow their phones?
Yes, our neighbour who caught by cold came over to borrow mine. They did not have
the number of village doctor, and I dialled the number for them on my phone, and
the doctor came here after calling. These visits generally does not raise the
fees, they wouldn’t ask for the visiting fee, and only charge for the drugs and
diagnosis.
(man aged 50, phone owner, in Gansu village)
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 16
18. Conclusion
Revisiting the assumptions
Assumptions of common mHealth narratives are easily violated.
Ownership not a good proxy for use
Use not determined by devices – reliance on voice
People not necessarily keen learners / teachers
Sharing only for important purposes and within limited networks
People are creative and active problem solvers
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 18
19. Conclusion
Implications for the design of mhealth applications
The violation of common mHealth assumptions (ubiquity, easy
sharing, enthusiastic and curious users, passive recipients, inevitable
positive impacts) can have implications for design and deployment.
Mhealth may:
be rendered ineffective by digital exclusion and passive use
compete with local coping strategies
potentially aggravate inequitable healthcare access
suffer from insufficient demand and technological learning
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 19
20. Conclusion
Implications for the design of mhealth applications
But there is a case for mhealth in rural, resource constrained areas.
This can involve, for example,
India
Snake bite responses
“Household health activists”
China
Medication information and order-placement
Elderly as target recipients
Both
Real-time information about health staff availability
One-button emergency call-back
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 20
21. Conclusion
Summary
Need to understand technology users and their coping strategies
before developing mHealth solutions
mHealth can break boundaries, but not every problem should be
solved with ICT first
Under flawed assumptions, mHealth may add little or even increase
inequities
Deployment of services requires (intensive and continuing) training of
users
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 21
22. Conclusion
Emerging questions
Besides the research questions posed here, promising avenues of
future research are emerging.
Who will be the winners of the upcoming “upscale battle”?
Who gains most from the mHealth hype?
How can we integrate new solutions into existing systems while avoiding
patchwork?
Are similar trends likely for other sectors of mobile service delivery, e.g.
mobile education and mobile money?
3 February 2014Phone use and
rural health in
India and China
Page 22
According to my latest count, there have been 950 active mhealth projects worldwide, some countries having more than 30 initiatives. There is a lot of excitement around mhealth, and here are just some examples of the common narrative. According to the various authors and organisations here, mhealth is basically going to revolutionise global healthcare, and all we need to do is to harness the technology that is already at our fingertips, because the infrastructure for mobile-phone-based service delivery is already there. Compelling argument, or is it not?
So let me just tell you very briefly how I have been trying to tackle these research questions.
In total I visited 15 sites for my interviews within Udaipur and Rajsamand district. Among the interviewees, the majority were phone users, which reflects larger trends of phone ownership in this state. Overall, 70% of the respondents owned a phone, but I think there were only one or two who didn’t have a single phone in their households.
Ownership – clearly not ubiquitous, so some blind spots, but generally high (all that shouldn’t surprise us, but this isn’t the indicator we rely on, anyway)Implications of acquisition patterns – some gifted, some bought for work, some handed over because no use, some because liking phonesPopulation groups remain excluded from phone useElderly’s use in Rajasthan more limited than in GansuPhone design can mitigate (though not overcome) exclusionLandline users in China
All of these 5 As have slightly different determinants (e.g. the channels of communication, the ability to be used within lending arrangements) and come in as a function of technological
My point here is not that the nobody uses phones or that mhealth is worthless, but I mean to stress the diversity of people and to stimulate thinking about those that should be the main target group of mhealth, namely people in poor health and poor health access conditions
So I would advise to first look at these elements and only then decide whether and how an mhealth intervention can add value