The following is a student presentation from the Summer 2012 "Media Psychology and Influence" course taught as part of the SPICE Study Abroad program at Universitat Erfurt. In this course, students were asked to propose a theoretically- and practically-relevant research model about one facet of media psychology and communication. Read more about SPICE: http://www.uni-erfurt.de/kommunikationswissenschaft/studium/bachelor-kommunikationswissenschaft/spice/
ABSTRACT: Digital technology has become a common channel for communication. This paper proposes the need to further study the long-term effects of digital technology on digital natives. Research suggests that digital technology has a direct effect on digital natives’ nonverbal communication skill. Two theories that explain the proposed direct effect between digital natives and poor nonverbal skills are the displacement hypothesis and brain development in digital natives. We propose two factors which explain why digital natives are showing a lack of nonverbal capabilities: the usage of text messaging and personality type could influence digital natives’ nonverbal communication skills.
Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting
1. By:
NOTHING TO LOL ABOUT: Christine
Devlin (WVU)
DIGITAL NATIVES AND THE
EFFECTS OF TEXTING Enya
Messersmith
(WVU)
Caitlin Rose
(Texas)
Meredith
Donaldson
(OU)
2. WHY STUDY DIGITAL NATIVES AND THE
EFFECTS OF TEXTING?
Cellphones are the primary source of
communication especially among digital
natives
Cellphones limit the amount of nonverbal
communication
Diminishing nonverbal skills
Difficulty maintaining personal and
professional relationships
3. IT’S NOT THAT SIMPLE
Nonverbal skills are affected by more
than just texting
Personality
Usage
4. DIGITAL NATIVES & NONVERBAL
COMMUNICATION
Who are digital natives?
People who are born into the digital world (Prensky, 2011).
native speakers
Nonverbal Communication
The various ways people communicate without language
i.e. eye behavior, touch, body movement, facial expressions.
Nonverbal communication is a learned skill (Riggio, 2006).
5. DIMINISHED NONVERBAL ABILITIES
Why are digital natives showing a lack of nonverbal skills?
2 theories
1. Displacement hypothesis
2. Brain Development
6. DISPLACEMENT HYPOTHESIS
Definition
Schramm studied children and television
More time spent w? activity A = less time spent w/ activity B
Displacing FtF communication w/ digital comm.
Nonverbal communication is a skill
Practice=perfect
7. DEVELOPMENT
Mullen
neural pathways necessary in the development of interpersonal skills
= unstimulated and underdeveloped
Small & Vorgan: Ibrain
digital technology is rewiring our brain and altering how we behave
Altered behavior- learning differently
Focus on technological skills NOT fundamental social skills
Iacoboni: Mirror neurons
Neural network
Nonverbal cues
Developed w/ FtF experience
8. HYPOTHESIS
H1: Digital natives have deficient nonverbal
communication skills.
What’s the problem?
Not every digital native lacks nonverbal
communication. Why are some digital natives able to
pick up on nonverbal cues better than others?
Personality
Access to mobile phone usage
9. MODERATING EFFECT OF PERSONALIT Y
Personality predicts nonverbal ability
Extroversion
Enjoy human interaction
Talkative, enthusiastic, assertive, outgoing
Introversion
keep to themselves, less outspoken
10. EXTROVERTS
Extroverts are better communicators
Extroverts display less communication apprehension
Communication Apprehension (CA)
Defined (Introverts)
“Broadly based anxiety related to oral
communication” (McCroskey, 1970)
Level of fear associated with real or anticipated
communication with another person
Leads to avoidance behaviors, social isolation
11. EXTROVERTS VS INTROVERTS AND THEIR
BEHAVIORS
Extroverts tend to have more friends
Extroverts spend more time in face-to-face
communication
Therefore extroverts practice nonverbal skills more
often than introverts
12. HYPOTHESIS
H2: Digital natives who are more extroverted have
better nonverbal communication skills.
People who have extroverted personalities are likely
to have more friends which allows them more
opportunity to practice their nonverbal
communication skills.
13. USAGE OF TEXTING
The amount of texts influence NV
communication
Digital Natives who text more frequently lose
time that could be spent on face to face
communication
14. SMS
Defined
Cue Lean
Texts lack nonverbal signals
History
Designed for task, used as social
One does not need NV for task based communication (it
actually gets in the way) however, texting is now used as a
social communication
“I was a young engineer working on new communications
technologies. We thought texting was a clever way for a
company's staff to send simple messages to one another. I'd
never have predicted that it would spread into the consumer
world and become what it is today. At the time it didn't seem
like a big deal” (Silver, 2011).
15. MORE TEXTING LESS FACE TO FACE
Digital Natives prefer texting
The number of texts being sent is on the rise, especially
among teenagers age 13 to 17. According to Nielsen, the
average teenager now sends 3,339 texts per month. (Parr,
2010)
"I think that's pretty bad because I think when these kids
grow up and it's time to form their permanent
relationships, they're not going have any idea how to
communicate with another person. No idea. They're going
be texting their spouses from different rooms," said a
worried Virginia mom
Cost efficient and more convenient
16. HYPOTHESIS
H3: Digital Natives who text more will have decreased ability
for NV skills
Even Psychiatrist Dr. Lise Van Susteren agrees that texting is
an emotionless thing . (The Money Times, 2012)
The more a digital native texts predicts a decrease in the
amount of face to face communication which will then
decrease the suf ficiency of their NV skills
17. UNLIMITED TEXT MESSAGING PLAN
Use of text messaging is a function of how
accessible it is
Different phone plans offer varying degrees of
accessibility
Unlimited plans see more texting