SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 22
HEADER / FOOTER INFORMATION (SUCH AS PRIVATE / CONFIDENTIAL)




          Process Failure
            Mode Effect
             Analysis
            CA/PA-RCA : Advanced Tool


           Northrop Grumman Corporation
           Integrated Systems
Overview Objective
     Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) – Provide a Basic
      familiarization with a tool that aids in quantifying
      severity, occurrences and detection of failures, and
      guides the creation of corrective action, process
      improvement and risk mitigation plans.




2
Agenda
          FMEA History
          What IS FMEA
             Definitions
             What it Can Do For You
          Types of FMEA
          Team Members Roles
          FMEA Terminology
          Getting Started with an FMEA
          The Worksheet
          FMEA Scoring



3
Agenda      Why does it always
              seem we have plenty
                 of time to fix our
               problems, but never
             enough time to prevent
             the problems by doing
              it right the first time?




4
FMEA History
    This “type” of thinking has been around for
    hundreds of years. It was first formalized in the
    aerospace industry during the Apollo program
    in the 1960’s.
      Initial automotive adoption in the 1970’s.
         Potential serious & frequent safety issues.


     Required by QS-9000 & Advanced Product Quality Planning Process
    in 1994.
         For all automotive suppliers.



     Now adopted by many other industries.
         Potential serious & frequent safety issues or loyalty issues.


5
What is FMEA ?

                    Cause & effect, Root Cause Analysis,
                    Fishbone Diagram Etc




    Failure Mode Effect Analysis



6
What is FMEA ?
    Definition: FMEA is an Engineering “Reliability Tool” That:
     Helps define, identify, prioritize, and eliminate known and/or potential
    failures of the system, design, or manufacturing process before they
    reach the customer. The goal is to eliminate the Failure Modes and
    reduce their risks.
     Provides structure for a Cross Functional Critique of a design or a
    Process

     Facilitates inter-departmental dialog.
     Is a mental discipline “great” engineering teams go through, when
    critiquing what might go wrong with the product or process.

     Is a living document which ultimately helps prevent, and not react
    to problems.


7
What is FMEA ?
     What it can do for you!
    1.) Identifies Design or process related Failure Modes before
    they happen.

    2.) Determines the Effect & Severity of these failure modes.

    3.) Identifies the Causes and probability of Occurrence of the
    Failure Modes.
    4.) Identifies the Controls and their Effectiveness.

    5.) Quantifies and prioritizes the Risks associated with
    the Failure Modes.
    6.) Develops & documents Action Plans that will occur
    to reduce risk.


8
Types of FMEAs ?
    System/Concept “S/CFMEA”- (Driven by System functions) A
    system is a organized set of parts or subsystems to accomplish one
    or more functions. System FMEAs are typically very early, before
    specific hardware has been determined.

    Design “DFMEA”- (Driven by part or component functions) A
    Design / Part is a unit of physical hardware that is considered a
    single replaceable part with respect to repair. Design FMEAs are
    typically done later in the development process when specific
    hardware has been determined.

    Process “PFMEA”- (Driven by process functions & part
    characteristics) A Process is a sequence of tasks that is
    organized to produce a product or provide a service. A
    Process FMEA can involve fabrication, assembly,
    transactions or services.

9
Types of FMEAs ?
     System/Concept “S/CFMEA”- (Driven by System functions) A
     system is a organized set of parts or subsystems to accomplish one
     or more functions. System FMEAs are typically very early, before
     specific hardware has been determined.

     Design “DFMEA”- (Driven by part or component functions) A
     Design / Part is a unit of physical hardware that is considered a
     single replaceable part with respect to repair. Design FMEAs are
     typically done later in the development process when specific
     hardware has been determined.

     Process “PFMEA”- (Driven by process functions & part
     characteristics) A Process is a sequence of tasks that is
     organized to produce a product or provide a service. A
     Process FMEA can involve fabrication, assembly,
     transactions or services.

10
The FMEA Team Roles
                                     Champion // Sponsor
                                     Champion & support   Sponsor
                                       Provides resources
                                          Provides resources & support
                                            Attends some meetings
                                             Attends some meetings
                                             Promotes team efforts
                                              Promotes team efforts
                                       Shares authority / / power with team
                                        Shares authority power with team
                                                 Kicks off team
                                                  Kicks off team
                                         Implements recommendations
                                          Implements recommendations


                                        FMEA Core Team
                                        FMEA Core Team
     Team Leader                               44––66Members                          Facilitator
                                                     Members                       “Watchdog“ of the process
   “Watchdog” of the project
     Good leadership skills             Expertise in Product / /Process               Keeps team on track
                                         Expertise in Product Process
      Respected & relaxed                      Cross functional                     FMEA Process expertise
                                                Cross functional
  Leads but doesn’t dominate               Honest Communication               Encourages / develops team dynamics
                                             Honest Communication
 Maintains full team participation            Active participation                 Communicates assertively
                                               Active participation
     Typically lead engineer                   Positive attitude                 Ensures everyone participates
                                                Positive attitude
                                           Respects other opinions
                                            Respects other opinions
                                        Participates in team decisions
                                         Participates in team decisions


                                              Recorder
                                               Recorder
                                      Keeps documentation of teams efforts
                                       Keeps documentation of teams efforts
                                                FMEA chart keeper
                                                 FMEA chart keeper
                                        Coordinates meeting rooms/time
                                          Coordinates meeting rooms/time
                                      Distributes meeting rooms && agendas
                                       Distributes meeting rooms agendas

11
FMEA Terminology

     1.) Failure Modes: (Specific loss of a function) is a concise
     description of how a part , system, or manufacturing process may
     potentially fail to perform its functions.
      2.) Failure Mode “Effect”: A description of the consequence or
      Ramification of a system or part failure. A typical failure mode may
      have several “effects” depending on which customer you consider.

     3.) Severity Rating: (Seriousness of the Effect) Severity is the
     numerical rating of the impact on customers.
            When multiple effects exist for a given failure mode, enter the worst
           case severity on the worksheet to calculate risk.
     4.) Failure Mode “Causes”: A description of the design or process
     deficiency (global cause or root level cause) that results
     in the failure mode .
           You must look at the causes not the symptoms of the failure. Most failure
           Modes have more than one Cause.
12
FMEA Terminology (continued)

     5.) Occurrence Rating: Is an estimate number of frequencies or
     cumulative number of failures (based on experience) that will
     occur (in our design concept) for a given cause over the intended
     “life of the design”.
     6.) Failure Mode “Controls”: The mechanisms, methods, tests,
     procedures, or controls that we have in place to PREVENT the
     Cause of the Failure Mode or DETECT the Failure Mode or Cause
     should it occur .
        Design Controls prevent or detect the Failure Mode prior to engineering
        release
     7.) Detection Rating: A numerical rating of the probability that a given
     set of controls WILL DISCOVER a specific Cause of Failure Mode to
     prevent bad parts leaving the facility or getting to the ultimate customer.
        Assuming that the cause of the failure did occur, assess the capabilities of the
        controls to find the design flaw..

13
FMEA Terminology (continued)

     8.) Risk Priority Number (RPN): Is the product of Severity,
     Occurrence, & Detection. Risk= RPN= S x O x D
     Often the RPN’s are sorted from high to low for consideration in the action planning
     step (Caution, RPN’s can be misleading- you must look for patterns).


     9.) Action Planning: A thoroughly thought out and well developed
     FMEA With High Risk Patterns that is not followed with corrective
     actions has little or no value, other than having a chart for an audit
     Action plans should be taken very seriously.
     If ignored, you have probably wasted much of your valuable time.
     Based on the FMEA analysis, strategies to reduce risk are focused on:

         Reducing the Severity Rating.
         Reducing the Occurrence Rating.
         Reducing the detection Rating.


14
Getting Started on FMEA
      What Must be done before FMEA
      Begins! your
        Understand
                            =QFD

                                                 Ready?
           Customer
            Needs


       Develop & Evaluate
        Product/Process     =Brain Storming
           Concepts


           Create           =4 to 6 Consensus Based Multi                    Develop and
         an Effective
                            Level Experts                                       Drive    7
         FMEA Team                             Determine
                                              “ Effects” of3                 Action Plan
                       = What we              The Failure
       Define the FMEA are and are
            Scope                                 Mode
                       not working           Severity Rating


                                               Determine 4        Determine5                6
                             Determine2
          Determine1                                                                         6
          Product or                          “ Causes” of        “ Controls”      Calculate &
                            Failure Modes     The Failure
           Process                                                                 Assess Risk
                             of Function          Mode
          Functions                                             Detection Rating
                                            Occurrence Rating


15
The FMEA Worksheet

                                                                                                Resp. &      p   p   p p
     Pr odu ct                                S         O                  D R
                  Fai l u r e   Fai l u r e                                    Act i on s       Tar get      S   O   D R
         or                                   E Cau ses C Con t r ol s     E P
                   Mode         Ef f ect s                                     / Pl an s       Com pl et e   E   C   E P
     Pr ocess                                 V         C                  T N
                                                                                                 Dat e       V   C   T N


        1            2             3               4             5           6         7
                                                                                        Develop
     Determine                 Determine                      Determine
                                                                                           and
     Product or               “Effects” of                    “Controls”
                                                                                          Drive
      Process                 The Failure                     Detection
                                                                                       Action Plan
     Functions                   Mode            Determine      Rating
                               Severity         “Causes” of
                  Determine     Rating          The Failure                Calculate
                    Failure                        Mode                        &
                     Modes                      Occurrence                  Assess
                  of Function                     Rating                     Risk




         If an FMEA was created during the Design Phase of the Program, USE IT!
                     Create an Action Plan for YOUR ROOT CAUSE
                         and Re-Evaluate the RPN Accordingly


16
FMEA Scoring
     Severity
                                                      Severity of Effect                                           Rating
     Extreme




                                   May endanger machine or operator. Hazardous without warning                      10

                                    May endanger machine or operator. Hazardous with warning                         9
                Major disruption to production line. Loss of primary function, 100% scrap. Possible jig lock and
                                                                                                                     8
     High




                                                   Major loss of Takt Time
                Reduced primary function performance. Product requires repair or Major Variance.
                                            Noticeable loss of Takt Time                                             7
                       Medium disruption of production. Possible scrap. Noticeable loss of takt time.
     Moderate




                       Loss of secondary function performance. Requires repair or Minor Variance                     6
                                  Minor disruption to production. Product must be repaired.
                                  Reduced secondary function performance.                                            5
                                     Minor defect, product repaired or "Use-As-Is" disposition.                      4
                                    Fit & Finish item. Minor defect, may be reprocessed on-line.                     3
     Low




                                        Minor Nonconformance, may be reprocessed on-line.                            2
     None




                                                           No effect                                                 1


17
FMEA Scoring
     Occurrence
                                                                                  Failure Capability
                                    Likelihood of Occurrence                       Rate    (Cpk) Rating
      Very High




                                                                                   1 in 2     < .33    10
                              Failure is almost inevitable
                                                                                   1 in 3     > .33    9
                                                                                   1 in 8     > .51    8
      High




                         Process is not in statistical control.
                     Similar processes have experienced problems.
                                                                                  1 in 20     > .67    7
                                                                                  1 in 80     > .83    6
      Moderate




                  Process is in statistical control but with isolated failures.
                    Previous processes have experienced occasional                1 in 400    > 1.00   5
                         failures or out-of-control conditions.
                                                                                  1 in 2000   > 1.17   4
                            Process is in statistical control.                    1 in 15k    > 1.33   3
      Low




                    Process is in statistical control. Only isolated                                   2
                  failures associated with almost identical processes. 1 in 150k              > 1.50
      Remote




                     Failure is unlikely. No known failures associated 1 in 1.5M                       1
                           with almost identical processes.                                   > 1.67


18
FMEA Scoring
     Detection
        Very Low              Likelihood that control will detect failure      Rating



                      No known control(s) available to detect failure mode.     10

                                                                                9
        Low




                     Controls have a remote chance of detecting the failure.
                                                                                8
                                                                                7
        Moderate




                         Controls may detect the existence of a failure         6
                                                                                5
                    Controls have a good chance of detecting the existence      4
        High




                    of a failure
                                                                                3
        Very High




                      The process automatically detects failure.                2
                      Controls will almost certainly detect the existence of
                      a failure.                                                1

19
FMEA Scoring
      RPN or Risk Priority Number

     The Calculation !

        S everity x O ccurrence x D etection=
        RPN



20
Failure Modes & Effect Analysis
      (FMEA) Part or Process Improvement
      FMEA is a technique utilized to define, identify, and eliminate known or
       potential failures or errors from a product or a process.
         Identify each candidate Part or Process, list likely failure mode,
           causes, and current controls
         Prioritize risk by using a ranking scale for severity, occurrence, and
           detection
         Mitigate risk – Can controls be added to reduce risk? Recalculate
           RPN.
         Characteristics with high Risk Priority Numbers should be selected for
           Improvement and Action Plans Created
         Recalculate RPN After Completion of Action Plans to Validate
           Improvements                                             Resp. &  p p p                                     p
     Pr odu ct                               S         O                  D R
                 Fai l u r e   Fai l u r e                                          Act i on s    Tar get      S O D   R
         or                                  E Cau ses C Con t r ols      E P
                  Mode         Ef f ect s                                           / Pl an s    Com pl et e   E C E   P
     Pr ocess                                V         C                  T N
                                                                                                   Dat e       V C T   N


                                                                              120
                                                                              120
      Hole    Oversize Unable to                Wrong         Ball Gage             Kit Drill
     Drilling   Hole Install BP 5               Drill Bit   8 Visual Insp 3          Bits
                                                                                                  010103       51 1 5
                       Fastener                  Used



21
Failure Modes & Effect Analysis




       Questions?
          Call or e-mail:

          Kevin M. Treanor        Bob Ollerton
          310-863-4182            310-332-1972/310-350-9121
          kevin.treanor@ngc.com   robert.ollerton@ngc.com




22

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Advancedpfmea 12667692707392-phpapp01

How to implement an effective fmea process
How to implement an effective fmea processHow to implement an effective fmea process
How to implement an effective fmea processASQ Reliability Division
 
NG BB 32 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
NG BB 32 Failure Modes and Effects AnalysisNG BB 32 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
NG BB 32 Failure Modes and Effects AnalysisLeanleaders.org
 
Failure mode and effects analysis
Failure mode and effects analysisFailure mode and effects analysis
Failure mode and effects analysisDeep parmar
 
Reducing Product Development Risk with Reliability Engineering Methods
Reducing Product Development Risk with Reliability Engineering MethodsReducing Product Development Risk with Reliability Engineering Methods
Reducing Product Development Risk with Reliability Engineering MethodsWilde Analysis Ltd.
 
IT 381_Chap_7.ppt
IT 381_Chap_7.pptIT 381_Chap_7.ppt
IT 381_Chap_7.pptRajendran C
 
Failure mode effects analysis, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Quality fun...
Failure mode effects analysis, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Quality fun...Failure mode effects analysis, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Quality fun...
Failure mode effects analysis, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Quality fun...SUNDHARAVADIVELR1
 
FMEA presentation for research and development
FMEA presentation for research and developmentFMEA presentation for research and development
FMEA presentation for research and developmentbasant11731
 
FMEA análise e odos de falhas e seus efeitos.ppt
FMEA análise e odos de falhas e seus efeitos.pptFMEA análise e odos de falhas e seus efeitos.ppt
FMEA análise e odos de falhas e seus efeitos.pptGleibsonHenrique
 
IT 381_Chap hubybybybybybybytggyguh7h7_7.ppt
IT 381_Chap hubybybybybybybytggyguh7h7_7.pptIT 381_Chap hubybybybybybybytggyguh7h7_7.ppt
IT 381_Chap hubybybybybybybytggyguh7h7_7.pptksujith0034
 
FMEA failure-mode-and-effect-analysis_Occupational safety and health
FMEA failure-mode-and-effect-analysis_Occupational safety and healthFMEA failure-mode-and-effect-analysis_Occupational safety and health
FMEA failure-mode-and-effect-analysis_Occupational safety and healthJing Jing Cheng
 
Bob (ababs) Youssef FMEA Workshop Training at Hughes rev3
Bob (ababs) Youssef FMEA Workshop Training at Hughes rev3Bob (ababs) Youssef FMEA Workshop Training at Hughes rev3
Bob (ababs) Youssef FMEA Workshop Training at Hughes rev3Abbas (Bob) Youssef MBA, PhD
 
Sean carter dan_deans
Sean carter dan_deansSean carter dan_deans
Sean carter dan_deansNASAPMC
 

Ähnlich wie Advancedpfmea 12667692707392-phpapp01 (20)

How to implement an effective fmea process
How to implement an effective fmea processHow to implement an effective fmea process
How to implement an effective fmea process
 
NG BB 32 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
NG BB 32 Failure Modes and Effects AnalysisNG BB 32 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
NG BB 32 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
 
The 10 most common fmea mistakes
The 10 most common fmea mistakes The 10 most common fmea mistakes
The 10 most common fmea mistakes
 
Failure mode and effects analysis
Failure mode and effects analysisFailure mode and effects analysis
Failure mode and effects analysis
 
Reducing Product Development Risk with Reliability Engineering Methods
Reducing Product Development Risk with Reliability Engineering MethodsReducing Product Development Risk with Reliability Engineering Methods
Reducing Product Development Risk with Reliability Engineering Methods
 
Quality & Reliability in Software Engineering
Quality & Reliability in Software EngineeringQuality & Reliability in Software Engineering
Quality & Reliability in Software Engineering
 
FMEA
FMEAFMEA
FMEA
 
IT 381_Chap_7.ppt
IT 381_Chap_7.pptIT 381_Chap_7.ppt
IT 381_Chap_7.ppt
 
Failure mode effects analysis, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Quality fun...
Failure mode effects analysis, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Quality fun...Failure mode effects analysis, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Quality fun...
Failure mode effects analysis, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Quality fun...
 
FMEA presentation for research and development
FMEA presentation for research and developmentFMEA presentation for research and development
FMEA presentation for research and development
 
FMEA análise e odos de falhas e seus efeitos.ppt
FMEA análise e odos de falhas e seus efeitos.pptFMEA análise e odos de falhas e seus efeitos.ppt
FMEA análise e odos de falhas e seus efeitos.ppt
 
IT 381_Chap hubybybybybybybytggyguh7h7_7.ppt
IT 381_Chap hubybybybybybybytggyguh7h7_7.pptIT 381_Chap hubybybybybybybytggyguh7h7_7.ppt
IT 381_Chap hubybybybybybybytggyguh7h7_7.ppt
 
FMEA failure-mode-and-effect-analysis_Occupational safety and health
FMEA failure-mode-and-effect-analysis_Occupational safety and healthFMEA failure-mode-and-effect-analysis_Occupational safety and health
FMEA failure-mode-and-effect-analysis_Occupational safety and health
 
Bob (ababs) Youssef FMEA Workshop Training at Hughes rev3
Bob (ababs) Youssef FMEA Workshop Training at Hughes rev3Bob (ababs) Youssef FMEA Workshop Training at Hughes rev3
Bob (ababs) Youssef FMEA Workshop Training at Hughes rev3
 
Fmea handout
Fmea handoutFmea handout
Fmea handout
 
It 381 chap 7
It 381 chap 7It 381 chap 7
It 381 chap 7
 
Fmea
FmeaFmea
Fmea
 
Systems overview sdlc
Systems overview sdlcSystems overview sdlc
Systems overview sdlc
 
Sean carter dan_deans
Sean carter dan_deansSean carter dan_deans
Sean carter dan_deans
 
Fmea
FmeaFmea
Fmea
 

Advancedpfmea 12667692707392-phpapp01

  • 1. HEADER / FOOTER INFORMATION (SUCH AS PRIVATE / CONFIDENTIAL) Process Failure Mode Effect Analysis CA/PA-RCA : Advanced Tool Northrop Grumman Corporation Integrated Systems
  • 2. Overview Objective  Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) – Provide a Basic familiarization with a tool that aids in quantifying severity, occurrences and detection of failures, and guides the creation of corrective action, process improvement and risk mitigation plans. 2
  • 3. Agenda  FMEA History  What IS FMEA  Definitions  What it Can Do For You  Types of FMEA  Team Members Roles  FMEA Terminology  Getting Started with an FMEA  The Worksheet  FMEA Scoring 3
  • 4. Agenda Why does it always seem we have plenty of time to fix our problems, but never enough time to prevent the problems by doing it right the first time? 4
  • 5. FMEA History This “type” of thinking has been around for hundreds of years. It was first formalized in the aerospace industry during the Apollo program in the 1960’s.  Initial automotive adoption in the 1970’s.  Potential serious & frequent safety issues.  Required by QS-9000 & Advanced Product Quality Planning Process in 1994.  For all automotive suppliers.  Now adopted by many other industries.  Potential serious & frequent safety issues or loyalty issues. 5
  • 6. What is FMEA ? Cause & effect, Root Cause Analysis, Fishbone Diagram Etc Failure Mode Effect Analysis 6
  • 7. What is FMEA ? Definition: FMEA is an Engineering “Reliability Tool” That:  Helps define, identify, prioritize, and eliminate known and/or potential failures of the system, design, or manufacturing process before they reach the customer. The goal is to eliminate the Failure Modes and reduce their risks.  Provides structure for a Cross Functional Critique of a design or a Process  Facilitates inter-departmental dialog.  Is a mental discipline “great” engineering teams go through, when critiquing what might go wrong with the product or process.  Is a living document which ultimately helps prevent, and not react to problems. 7
  • 8. What is FMEA ? What it can do for you! 1.) Identifies Design or process related Failure Modes before they happen. 2.) Determines the Effect & Severity of these failure modes. 3.) Identifies the Causes and probability of Occurrence of the Failure Modes. 4.) Identifies the Controls and their Effectiveness. 5.) Quantifies and prioritizes the Risks associated with the Failure Modes. 6.) Develops & documents Action Plans that will occur to reduce risk. 8
  • 9. Types of FMEAs ? System/Concept “S/CFMEA”- (Driven by System functions) A system is a organized set of parts or subsystems to accomplish one or more functions. System FMEAs are typically very early, before specific hardware has been determined. Design “DFMEA”- (Driven by part or component functions) A Design / Part is a unit of physical hardware that is considered a single replaceable part with respect to repair. Design FMEAs are typically done later in the development process when specific hardware has been determined. Process “PFMEA”- (Driven by process functions & part characteristics) A Process is a sequence of tasks that is organized to produce a product or provide a service. A Process FMEA can involve fabrication, assembly, transactions or services. 9
  • 10. Types of FMEAs ? System/Concept “S/CFMEA”- (Driven by System functions) A system is a organized set of parts or subsystems to accomplish one or more functions. System FMEAs are typically very early, before specific hardware has been determined. Design “DFMEA”- (Driven by part or component functions) A Design / Part is a unit of physical hardware that is considered a single replaceable part with respect to repair. Design FMEAs are typically done later in the development process when specific hardware has been determined. Process “PFMEA”- (Driven by process functions & part characteristics) A Process is a sequence of tasks that is organized to produce a product or provide a service. A Process FMEA can involve fabrication, assembly, transactions or services. 10
  • 11. The FMEA Team Roles Champion // Sponsor Champion & support Sponsor Provides resources Provides resources & support Attends some meetings Attends some meetings Promotes team efforts Promotes team efforts Shares authority / / power with team Shares authority power with team Kicks off team Kicks off team Implements recommendations Implements recommendations FMEA Core Team FMEA Core Team Team Leader 44––66Members Facilitator Members “Watchdog“ of the process “Watchdog” of the project Good leadership skills Expertise in Product / /Process Keeps team on track Expertise in Product Process Respected & relaxed Cross functional FMEA Process expertise Cross functional Leads but doesn’t dominate Honest Communication Encourages / develops team dynamics Honest Communication Maintains full team participation Active participation Communicates assertively Active participation Typically lead engineer Positive attitude Ensures everyone participates Positive attitude Respects other opinions Respects other opinions Participates in team decisions Participates in team decisions Recorder Recorder Keeps documentation of teams efforts Keeps documentation of teams efforts FMEA chart keeper FMEA chart keeper Coordinates meeting rooms/time Coordinates meeting rooms/time Distributes meeting rooms && agendas Distributes meeting rooms agendas 11
  • 12. FMEA Terminology 1.) Failure Modes: (Specific loss of a function) is a concise description of how a part , system, or manufacturing process may potentially fail to perform its functions. 2.) Failure Mode “Effect”: A description of the consequence or Ramification of a system or part failure. A typical failure mode may have several “effects” depending on which customer you consider. 3.) Severity Rating: (Seriousness of the Effect) Severity is the numerical rating of the impact on customers.  When multiple effects exist for a given failure mode, enter the worst case severity on the worksheet to calculate risk. 4.) Failure Mode “Causes”: A description of the design or process deficiency (global cause or root level cause) that results in the failure mode . You must look at the causes not the symptoms of the failure. Most failure Modes have more than one Cause. 12
  • 13. FMEA Terminology (continued) 5.) Occurrence Rating: Is an estimate number of frequencies or cumulative number of failures (based on experience) that will occur (in our design concept) for a given cause over the intended “life of the design”. 6.) Failure Mode “Controls”: The mechanisms, methods, tests, procedures, or controls that we have in place to PREVENT the Cause of the Failure Mode or DETECT the Failure Mode or Cause should it occur . Design Controls prevent or detect the Failure Mode prior to engineering release 7.) Detection Rating: A numerical rating of the probability that a given set of controls WILL DISCOVER a specific Cause of Failure Mode to prevent bad parts leaving the facility or getting to the ultimate customer. Assuming that the cause of the failure did occur, assess the capabilities of the controls to find the design flaw.. 13
  • 14. FMEA Terminology (continued) 8.) Risk Priority Number (RPN): Is the product of Severity, Occurrence, & Detection. Risk= RPN= S x O x D Often the RPN’s are sorted from high to low for consideration in the action planning step (Caution, RPN’s can be misleading- you must look for patterns). 9.) Action Planning: A thoroughly thought out and well developed FMEA With High Risk Patterns that is not followed with corrective actions has little or no value, other than having a chart for an audit Action plans should be taken very seriously. If ignored, you have probably wasted much of your valuable time. Based on the FMEA analysis, strategies to reduce risk are focused on: Reducing the Severity Rating. Reducing the Occurrence Rating. Reducing the detection Rating. 14
  • 15. Getting Started on FMEA What Must be done before FMEA Begins! your Understand =QFD Ready? Customer Needs Develop & Evaluate Product/Process =Brain Storming Concepts Create =4 to 6 Consensus Based Multi Develop and an Effective Level Experts Drive 7 FMEA Team Determine “ Effects” of3 Action Plan = What we The Failure Define the FMEA are and are Scope Mode not working Severity Rating Determine 4 Determine5 6 Determine2 Determine1 6 Product or “ Causes” of “ Controls” Calculate & Failure Modes The Failure Process Assess Risk of Function Mode Functions Detection Rating Occurrence Rating 15
  • 16. The FMEA Worksheet Resp. & p p p p Pr odu ct S O D R Fai l u r e Fai l u r e Act i on s Tar get S O D R or E Cau ses C Con t r ol s E P Mode Ef f ect s / Pl an s Com pl et e E C E P Pr ocess V C T N Dat e V C T N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Develop Determine Determine Determine and Product or “Effects” of “Controls” Drive Process The Failure Detection Action Plan Functions Mode Determine Rating Severity “Causes” of Determine Rating The Failure Calculate Failure Mode & Modes Occurrence Assess of Function Rating Risk If an FMEA was created during the Design Phase of the Program, USE IT! Create an Action Plan for YOUR ROOT CAUSE and Re-Evaluate the RPN Accordingly 16
  • 17. FMEA Scoring Severity Severity of Effect Rating Extreme May endanger machine or operator. Hazardous without warning 10 May endanger machine or operator. Hazardous with warning 9 Major disruption to production line. Loss of primary function, 100% scrap. Possible jig lock and 8 High Major loss of Takt Time Reduced primary function performance. Product requires repair or Major Variance. Noticeable loss of Takt Time 7 Medium disruption of production. Possible scrap. Noticeable loss of takt time. Moderate Loss of secondary function performance. Requires repair or Minor Variance 6 Minor disruption to production. Product must be repaired. Reduced secondary function performance. 5 Minor defect, product repaired or "Use-As-Is" disposition. 4 Fit & Finish item. Minor defect, may be reprocessed on-line. 3 Low Minor Nonconformance, may be reprocessed on-line. 2 None No effect 1 17
  • 18. FMEA Scoring Occurrence Failure Capability Likelihood of Occurrence Rate (Cpk) Rating Very High 1 in 2 < .33 10 Failure is almost inevitable 1 in 3 > .33 9 1 in 8 > .51 8 High Process is not in statistical control. Similar processes have experienced problems. 1 in 20 > .67 7 1 in 80 > .83 6 Moderate Process is in statistical control but with isolated failures. Previous processes have experienced occasional 1 in 400 > 1.00 5 failures or out-of-control conditions. 1 in 2000 > 1.17 4 Process is in statistical control. 1 in 15k > 1.33 3 Low Process is in statistical control. Only isolated 2 failures associated with almost identical processes. 1 in 150k > 1.50 Remote Failure is unlikely. No known failures associated 1 in 1.5M 1 with almost identical processes. > 1.67 18
  • 19. FMEA Scoring Detection Very Low Likelihood that control will detect failure Rating No known control(s) available to detect failure mode. 10 9 Low Controls have a remote chance of detecting the failure. 8 7 Moderate Controls may detect the existence of a failure 6 5 Controls have a good chance of detecting the existence 4 High of a failure 3 Very High The process automatically detects failure. 2 Controls will almost certainly detect the existence of a failure. 1 19
  • 20. FMEA Scoring RPN or Risk Priority Number The Calculation ! S everity x O ccurrence x D etection= RPN 20
  • 21. Failure Modes & Effect Analysis (FMEA) Part or Process Improvement  FMEA is a technique utilized to define, identify, and eliminate known or potential failures or errors from a product or a process.  Identify each candidate Part or Process, list likely failure mode, causes, and current controls  Prioritize risk by using a ranking scale for severity, occurrence, and detection  Mitigate risk – Can controls be added to reduce risk? Recalculate RPN.  Characteristics with high Risk Priority Numbers should be selected for Improvement and Action Plans Created  Recalculate RPN After Completion of Action Plans to Validate Improvements Resp. & p p p p Pr odu ct S O D R Fai l u r e Fai l u r e Act i on s Tar get S O D R or E Cau ses C Con t r ols E P Mode Ef f ect s / Pl an s Com pl et e E C E P Pr ocess V C T N Dat e V C T N 120 120 Hole Oversize Unable to Wrong Ball Gage Kit Drill Drilling Hole Install BP 5 Drill Bit 8 Visual Insp 3 Bits 010103 51 1 5 Fastener Used 21
  • 22. Failure Modes & Effect Analysis Questions? Call or e-mail: Kevin M. Treanor Bob Ollerton 310-863-4182 310-332-1972/310-350-9121 kevin.treanor@ngc.com robert.ollerton@ngc.com 22