Early results from Bristol's Quality of Life Survey 2010 showing improvement in residents' satisfaction with the council and some upward movement of quality of life indicators. Also, other community cohesion indicators remain stable.
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
Early findings from the Quality of Life Survey
1. Quality of Life Survey 2010 – key findings Consultation, Research and Intelligence Team, Communications and Marketing, Deputy Chief Executive Department Bristol City Council March 2011
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Editor's Notes
Mike and Sarah both work in new central R,C &I team. This brief presentation combines findings from both surveys.
Both these surveys compliment LAA performance indicators. Surveys are different, with different users and both add value. Measure only resident perceptions and few perception indicators are in our LAA. Synergy between indicators sets/questions (e.g. Audit Commission source) QoL - booster sampling to improve representative sample – more confidence with results from the larger survey. Place – has a greater focus on residents view compared to the old BV surveys.
List of topics/slides is related to your performance indicators and results from both surveys - on key concerns and where we feel citizens insights are giving us strong messages = added value.
Each slides combines the results from both surveys, to give a rich picture of how neighbourhoods are changing and how we compare. This is an umbrella indicator covering many issues. Need to drill down and unpick – which issues are causing most and least concern or satisfaction.
Each slides combines the results from both surveys, to give a rich picture of how neighbourhoods are changing and how we compare. This is an umbrella indicator covering many issues. Need to drill down and unpick – which issues are causing most and least concern or satisfaction.
Key place questions have been included in QoL survey 2009. Focus group results available in next few weeks. Also available: neighbourhoods showing most deterioration (Hillfields Avonmouth), and most improvement (Hartcliffe, Knowle).
Each slides combines the results from both surveys, to give a rich picture of how neighbourhoods are changing and how we compare. This is an umbrella indicator covering many issues. Need to drill down and unpick – which issues are causing most and least concern or satisfaction.
This indicator was asked in both surveys and shows no trend. But QoL survey shows big spatial variation across the city.
Satisfaction with parks and open spaces is one of the service areas where Bristol is doing doing well/compares well, but still room for improvement (as in 2006).
Not a top priority for residents, but some opposing views: Declining satisfaction with museums, theatres etc Improving satisfaction for libraries. Map show how often people visit such facilities and large variation across the city. Declining visits picks up declining satisfaction. New Colston Hall, Banksy Exhibition should have an impact on this indicator.
Not a top priority for residents, but declining satisfaction. Both surveys tell a similar story.
Key place questions have been included in QoL survey 2009. Focus group results available in next few weeks. Also available: neighbourhoods showing most deterioration (Hillfields Avonmouth), and most improvement (Hartcliffe, Knowle).
Key place questions have been included in QoL survey 2009. Focus group results available in next few weeks. Also available: neighbourhoods showing most deterioration (Hillfields Avonmouth), and most improvement (Hartcliffe, Knowle).
Key place questions have been included in QoL survey 2009. Focus group results available in next few weeks. Also available: neighbourhoods showing most deterioration (Hillfields Avonmouth), and most improvement (Hartcliffe, Knowle).
Key place questions have been included in QoL survey 2009. Focus group results available in next few weeks. Also available: neighbourhoods showing most deterioration (Hillfields Avonmouth), and most improvement (Hartcliffe, Knowle).
Not a top priority for residents, but declining satisfaction. Both surveys tell a similar story.