SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 13
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra          IMPoME 2012


                                                 2.4
                           The Principle of Mathematical Induction
                                        Assignment from:
                                           Sri Rejeki
                                      Ahmad Wachidul Kohar



2.4.1 The standard PMI

Suppose we consider a set S, which is assumed to be a subset of the natural numbers N, and
suppose S is known to have the following properties:
(I1) 1 ∈ S
(I2) If n ≥ 1 and n ∈ S, then n + 1 ∈ S


Theorem 2.4.1 (PMI). Suppose S ⊆ N has the properties that
(I1) 1 ∈ S
(I2) If n ≥ 1 and n ∈ S, then n + 1 ∈ S. Then S = N.
Proof:
Suppose S ⊆ N satisfies properties I1–I2. Suppose also that S = N. Then either S ⊆ N or N ⊆ S.
But S ⊆ N is assumed, so N ⊆ S. Thus there exists n ∈ N such that n ∈/ S. If we define T = NS
= N ∩ S , then T ⊆ N and n ∈ T . Thus T is a nonempty subset of the natural numbers, which, by
the WOP, contains a smallest element a. Now it is impossible that a = 1 because 1 ∈ S. Thus a >
1, so that a −1 ∈ N. Furthermore, since a is the smallest element of T , it must be that a −1 ∈/ T .
Thus a − 1 ∈ S. But by I2, since a − 1 ∈ S, it follows that a = (a − 1) + 1 ∈ S. But if a ∈ S, then
a ∈/ T . This is a contradiction. Thus there is no smallest element of T , which means that T = ∅.
Therefore, N ⊆ S, from which S = N.


Theorem 2.4.2 (Sample). For all n ∈ N, P (n).
Proof:
We use induction on n ≥ 1.
(I1) P (1).
(I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and P (n). Then . . . . Thus, P (n + 1).
Therefore, by induction, P (n) is true for all n ∈ N.



Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                          Page 1
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra      IMPoME 2012


Theorem 2.4.3. For all n ∈ N,
             …………………………………………………………………………(2.54)
Proof:
We use induction on n ≥ 1.
(I1) For the case n = 1, we have               and 1(1 + 1)/2 = 1,
      so that Eq. (2.54) holds true for n = 1.
(I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and                          . Then




      Thus, Eq. (2.54) holds for n +1.
By the PMI, it follows that Eq. (2.54) holds for all n ∈ N.

Theorem 2.4.4. Suppose A, B1 , B2 ,..., Bn are sets. Then
A ∪ ( B1 ∩ B2 ∩ ··· ∩ Bn ) = ( A ∪ B1 ) ∩ ( A ∪ B2 ) ∩ ··· ∩ ( A ∪ Bn )……………………(2.56)
Proof:
To clean up the notation, we write Eq. (2.56) as
                                ……………………………………………………(2.57)
(I1) If n = 1, then ∩k=1 Bk = B1 , so that both sides of Eq. (2.57) are simply A ∪ B1 .
(I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and Eq. (2.57) holds for n. Then




                                                =
                                                =
      Thus, Eq. (2.57) holds for n + 1.
By the PMI, Eq. (2.57) holds for all n ∈ N.

2.4.2 Variation of the PMI
Supposed that j is any whole number and that S ⊆ W has the following properties.
(J1) j ∈ S
(J2) If n ≥ j and n ∈ S, then n + 1 ∈ S.
By mimicking almost word for word the proof of Theorem 2.4.1, we would have a similar PMI
rooted, if you will, at j ∈ W.

Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                       Page 2
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra           IMPoME 2012




Theorem 2.4.6. Suppose a ∈ R{0} and m, n ∈ W. Then am · an = am+n .
Proof:
We prove by induction on n ≥ 0 (thinking of m as fixed).

(J1) For the case n = 0, we have am · a0 = am · 1 = am = am+0 . Thus the result is true for
    n = 0.

(J2) Suppose n ≥ 0 and am · an = am+n . We show that am · an+1 = am+(n+1) .

                     am · an+1 = am · (an · a) = (am · an ) · a

                                  = am+n · a = a(m+n)+1 = am+(n+1) .

   Thus by induction, am · an = am+n for all a ∈ R{0} and m, n ∈ W.
Another example of a recursive definition is the factorial.
                                                0! = 1,
                               (n + 1)! = (n + 1) · n! for n ≥ 0.

2.4.3 Strong Induction
Suppose         has the following properties.
      K1.
      K2.     If        and                       , then       .

Theorem 2.4.7 Suppose            has the properties K1 and K2 above. Then

Theorem 2.4.8 (Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic). Every natural number n ≥ 2 can be
written as the product of primes, and this factorization is unique, except perhaps for the order in
which the factors are written.
Proof:
We’ll prove only the existence part now, and save uniqueness for Section 2.7. Since 2 is prime,
the result is true for n = 2. Thus let n ≥ 3 be given, and suppose all of 2, 3,..., n − 1 can be
written as the product of primes. Now if n is itself prime, then its prime factorization is trivial,
and the result is true. On the other hand, if n is composite, then there exist a, b ∈ N such that 1
< a, b < n and n = ab. By the inductive assumption, since 2 ≤ a, b ≤ n − 1, both a and b can
be written as the product of primes. That is,
                                                 a = p1 p2 ··· ps
                                                  b = q1 q2 ··· qt
                                                           ,

Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                          Page 3
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra                     IMPoME 2012


where all pk and qk are prime. Thus n = p1 ··· ps q1 ··· qt , and we have found a prime
factorization for n.

EXERCISES

1.   Show that the smallest element of a nonempty subset of W is unique.
     Answer:
     Suppose that U⊂W and U≠Ø. Let a, b are smallest elements in U, where a                  b so
        c U , c a and c b , Since a b , c > b and c > a , there are possibilities a < b or a > b.
     It is impossible if a > b because a is smallest element in U.
     It is impossible if b > a because b is also smallest element in U.
     Therefore a = b. Thus, the smallest number in U is unique

2.   Prove the following sum formulas:
             n
     a.      k 1
                   k2        n n 1 2n 1 / 6
          Proof:
          We use induction on n ≥ 1.
                                                                      1
          (I1) For the case n = 1, we have                            k 1
                                                                            k2     1 and 1 1 1 2 1 1 / 6 1 2 3 / 6 1 , so that
                       n
                       k 1
                             k2           n n 1 2n 1 / 6 holds true for n = 1.
                                                     n
          (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and                     k 1
                                                           k2     n n 1 2n 1 / 6 . Then
                 n 1                  n
                                                            n n 1 2n 1
                       k2                 k2     n 12                                  n 12
                 k 1              k 1                            6
                                  n n 1 2n 1 6 n 1 2  n 1 n 2n 1                                 6n 1
                                            6                 6
                                   n 1 2n 2 7 n 6 n 1 n 2 2n 3
                                         6              6
                                  n
                 Thus             k 1
                                          k2    n n 1 2n 1 / 6 holds for n + 1.
                                                           n
          By the PMI, It follows that                      k 1
                                                                 k2       n n 1 2n 1 / 6 holds for all n ∈ N.
             n
     b.      k 1
                       1 k k2                  1 nn n 1 /2
          Proof:
          We use induction on n ≥ 1.
                                                                             1
          (I1) For the case n = 1, we have                                   k 1
                                                                                    1 k k2    1 and   1 11 1 1 / 2   1, so that
                    n
                    k 1
                              1 k k2              1 n n n 1 / 2 holds true for n = 1.



Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                                                     Page 4
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra                                                     IMPoME 2012

                                                           n
         (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and                            k 1
                                                                       1 k k2                 1 n n n 1 / 2 . Then

                   n 1                             n                                                                                     1 nn n 1
                   k 1
                           1 k k2                  k 1
                                                               1 k k2              1n             1n    1
                                                                                                             n 12                                           1n   1
                                                                                                                                                                         n 12
                                                                                                                                            2
                                                   1 nn n 1                    2 1n           1
                                                                                                  n 12                     1n        1
                                                                                                                                          n n 1           2 1n       1
                                                                                                                                                                         n 12
                                                                               2                                                                  2
                                                       n 1                                                                 n 1
                                                   1           n 1                 n      2n 1                        1          n 1 n 2
                                                                               2                                                  2

                               n
                  Thus         k 1
                                             1 k k2                1 n n n 1 / 2 holds for n + 1.
                                                                       n
          By the PMI, It follows that                                  k 1
                                                                                   1 k k2               1 n n n 1 / 2 holds for all n ∈ N.


            n                  n         2
    c.      k   1
                  k3           k   1
                                     k
         Proof:
         We use induction on n ≥ 1.
                                                                               1                                 1         2
         (I1) For the case n = 1, we have                                      k   1
                                                                                     k3       1 and              k   1
                                                                                                                       k         1,
                               n                       n           2
                so that        k 1
                                     k3                k 1
                                                               k       holds true for n = 1.
                                                           n                        n         2
         (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and                            k   1
                                                                 k3                 k   1
                                                                                          k . Then
                                                                                                                                                      2
                   n 1 3                 n         2
                                                                           3                                 2                   3         nn 1
                   k 1
                       k                 k 1
                                               k               n 1                 1 2 ... n                          n 1                                   n 13
                                                                                                                                             2
                                                                                                                                                            2
                                                   n2                                                   n2           4n 1                           n 2
                                   n 12                            n 1                  n 12                                              n 12
                                                   4                                                                 4                                4
                                                                                                             2
                                     n 12 n 2                      2
                                                                                   n 1 n 2
                                         4                                            2
                           n                       n           2
                Thus       k   1
                                 k3                k    1
                                                          k        holds for n + 1.
                                                                   n                      n         2
         By the PMI, It follows that                               k   1
                                                                         k3               k   1
                                                                                                k       holds for all n ∈ N.
            n
    d.      k 1
                  2k 1             n2
         Proof:
         We use induction on n ≥ 1.
                                                                                   1                                                                  n
         (I3) For the case n = 1, we have                                           k 1
                                                                                          2k 1               1 and 12            1 , so that          k 1
                                                                                                                                                            2k 1            n2
                holds true for n = 1.

Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                                                                                                      Page 5
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra                                     IMPoME 2012

                                                              n
         (I4) Suppose n ≥ 1 and                               k 1
                                                                       2k 1               n 2 . Then
                n 1                           n
                          2k 1                    2k 1                     2(n 1) 1              n2     2n 1
                k 1                        k 1

                                         n2         2n 1
                                           n 12
                                 n
                Thus             k 1
                                         2k 1                n 2 holds for n + 1.
                                                                       n
         By the PMI, It follows that                                   k 1
                                                                             2k 1               n 2 holds for all n ∈ N.
            n
    e.      k 0
                  2k        2n       1
                                           1
         Proof:
         We use induction on n ≥ 0.
                                                                              0
         (I1) For the case n = 0, we have                                     k 0
                                                                                      2k        1and 2 0   1
                                                                                                               1 2 1 1,
                                     n
                so that              k 0
                                           2k        2n      1
                                                                     1 holds true for n = 0.
                                                                 n
         (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and                                  k 0
                                                                       2k     2n      1
                                                                                            1 . Then
                      n 1                     n
                      k 0
                            2k                k 0
                                                    2k        2n       1
                                                                             2n   1
                                                                                          1 2n     1
                                                                                                       2 2n     1
                                                                                                                     1
                                     2n       2
                                                    1
                                 n
                Thus             k 0
                                         2k         2n   1
                                                                 1 holds for n + 1.
                                                                       n
         By the PMI, It follows that                                   k 0
                                                                             2k       2n    1
                                                                                                  1 holds for all n ∈ N.
            n
    f.      k 1
                 1/ k k 1                  n/ n 1
         Proof:
         We use induction on n ≥ 1.
                                                                                             1
         (I1) For the case n = 1, we have                                                    k 1
                                                                                                  1/ k k 1          1 / 2 and 1 / 1 1   1 / 2 , so that
                      n
                      k 1
                           1/ k k 1                 n / n 1 holds true for n = 1.
                                                                 n
         (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and                                  k 1
                                                                     1/ k k 1               n / n 1 . Then
                      n 1                                n                                                           n         1
                      k 1
                           1/ k k 1                      k 1
                                                                 1/ k k 1                 1/ n 1 n 2
                                                                                                                    n 1     n 1 n 2
                                                        nn 2 1                        n 2 2n 1                   n 12           n 1
                                                        n 1 n 2                       n 1 n 2                  n 1 n 2          n 2
                                     n
                  Thus               k 1
                                           1/ k k 1                    n / n 1 holds for n + 1.
                                                                       n
         By the PMI, It follows that                                   k 1
                                                                            1/ k k 1               n / n 1 holds for all n ∈ N.

Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                                                                             Page 6
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra                                                    IMPoME 2012



3.   Suppose n ∈ N and a, b1, b2, …,bn ∈ R. Show that
         n                 n
     a      b
         k 1 k             k 1
                                 abk
     Answer:
         n
     a      b
         k 1 k
                       a b1         b2     ... bn
                       ab1       ab2       .... abn
                           n
                           k 1
                                 abk


4.   Suppose m, n ∈ N and a1, a2, …, am, b1, b2, …,bn ∈ R. Show that
         m             n                   m                 n
         j 1
               aj         b
                       k 1 k                   j 1           k 1
                                                                     a j bk
     Answer:
         m             n                                                                   n
         j 1
               aj         b
                       k 1 k
                                          a1         a2          ... a m                      b
                                                                                           k 1 k
                                                        n                              n                                    n
                                          a1               b
                                                        k 1 k
                                                                         a2               b
                                                                                       k 1 k
                                                                                                      ... a m                  b
                                                                                                                            k 1 k
                                                n                              n                                   n
                                                   ab
                                                k 1 1 1
                                                                                  a b
                                                                               k 1 2 k
                                                                                                     ...              a b
                                                                                                                   k 1 m k
                                                m                n
                                                j 1              k 1
                                                                       a j bk


                                                                                         n                     n
5.   Suppose a1, a2, …, an ∈ R. Show that                                                k
                                                                                                a
                                                                                               1 k             k 1
                                                                                                                       ak
     Proof:
     We use induction on n ≥ 1.
                                                                           1                                   a1 , if a1       0
     (I1) For the case n = 1, we have                                         a
                                                                           k 1 k
                                                                                                a1                                      and
                                                                                                                a1 , if a1          0
               1                               a1 , if a1              0
                k 1
                      ak       a1
                                                a1 , if a1               0
                           n                        n
         so that              a
                           k 1 k                    k 1
                                                            ak holds true for n = 1.
                                                        n                          n
     (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and                                a
                                                        k 1 k                      k 1
                                                                                           ak . Then
                n 1                 n
                   a
                k 1 k
                                       a
                                    k 1 k
                                                        a k 1 , by theorem2.3.22
                                    n                                          n
                                       a
                                    k 1 k
                                                        ak       1             k 1
                                                                                       ak            ak    1

                                    n 1
                                    k 1
                                          ak



Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                                                                                         Page 7
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra                                                  IMPoME 2012

                   n                   n
      Thus            a
                   k 1 k               k 1
                                             ak holds for n + 1.
6.   Prove Eqs. (2.61) and (2.62) for a, b, ∈ R{0} and m, n ∈ W.
     Proof:
             n
         am     a mn
        Proof:
        We use induction on n ≥ 0 (thinking of m as fixed).
                                                                                  n                   0                                                         n
        (I1) For the case n = 0, we have a m                                                     am        1 and a m.0          1 , so that a m                       a mn
             holds true for n = 0.
                                                        n                                                                 n 1
        (I2) Suppose n ≥ 0 and a m                              a mn . We have show that a m                                         a m( n        1)
                                                                                                                                                        .
                       n 1             n
             am                  am          am         a mn a m             a mn            m
                                                                                                  a m( n   1)

                                 n
             Thus a m                  a mn holds for n + 1.
                                                                n
        By the PMI, It follows that a m                                 a mn holds for all n ∈ N.
             n
         ab    a nb n
        Proof:
        We use induction on n ≥ 0 (thinking of m as fixed).
                                                                         0                                                                              n
        (I1) For the case n = 0, we have ab                                       1 and a 0b 0              1 1 1 , so that ab                               a nb n holds
             true for n = 0.
                                                        n                                                                     n 1
        (I2) Suppose n ≥ 0 and ab                               a nb n . We have show that ab                                            a n 1b n 1 .
                       n 1            n
                 ab              ab        ab       a n b n ab            a n a bn b                       a n 1b n   1

                                 n
             Thus ab                  a nb n holds for n + 1.
                                                                    a nb n holds for all n ∈ N.
                                                            n
        By the PMI, It follows that ab
                                                                                 n
7.   For x ∈ R{0} and n ∈ N, define x        x1                n

     This exercise will show that the rules for exponents in Eqs. (2.60) – (2.62) hold for all a, b ∈
     R{0} and m,n ∈ Z.
                             n               1
     a. Show that a                   an         for all n W .
        Answer:
                                                                    1                    1                                                 1
        (I1) For the case n = 1, we have a                                   a1                  a 1 , so that a          n
                                                                                                                                    an             holds true
             for n = 1.
                                                    n               1                                                                               1
        (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and a                            an          . We have show that a                         ( n 1)
                                                                                                                                     an        1
                                                                                                                                                        ..
                  ( n 1)             1 n 1                                           1
             a                   a                an    1   1
                                                                        an   1

                             n               1
             Thus a                  an          holds for n + 1.

Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                                                                                                 Page 8
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra                IMPoME 2012

                                                                                           1
        By the PMI, It follows that a                                            n
                                                                                      an       holds for all n ∈ N.
    b. Show that a                    m
                                          a       n
                                                           a      m n
                                                                              for all m,n ∈ W.
       Answer:
             m           n            m ( n)                      m n
        a        a               a                            a
    c. Show that a m a                        n
                                                          am      n
                                                                        for all m,n ∈ W.
       Answer:
        ama          n
                                 am   ( n)
                                                          am      n

                                                  n
    d. Show that a                    m
                                                           a mn for all m,n ∈ W.
        Answer:
                                          m           n
        Using 2.61 a                                          a(       m)( n )
                                                                                  , based on the second point of theorem 2.3.6
                                                              a mn
                                              n
    e. Show that a m                                      a    mn
                                                                        for all m,n ∈ W.
        Answer:
                                                  n
        Using 2.61 a m                                     a ( m)(        n)
                                                                                , based on the theorem 2.3.7
                                                           a ( m)        1 (n)
                                                                                 , using A11 (commutative property of multiplication)
                                                                  1 mn
                                                          a                     , based on the theorem 2.3.7
                                      m n
    f. Show that a                                        a    mn
                                                                        for all m,n ∈ W.
        Answer:
                                          m n
        Using 2.61 a                                       a(         m)( n )
                                                                                , based on the first point of theorem 2.3.6
                                                                  mn
                                                           a                , based on the theorem 2.3.7
                                                           a(     1) mn

                                                                  mn
                                                           a
                                           n
    g. Show that ab                                       a nb          n
                                                                              for all m,n ∈ W.
        Answer:
                                               n
        Using 2.62 ab                                      a nb           n



8. Suppose                                        and                       . Prove the following.
  a)
       Answer:
       For                   ,                                                         . This result is true for
       Suppose                         and                                             . We show that



Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                                                                     Page 9
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra               IMPoME 2012




                                             , Thus by induction for         , the equation is true
   b)
                   :
           For            ,                                          . This result is true for          , and


           Suppose                and                     . We show that                                  .




                                                   ,
           Thus by induction for            , the equation is true
9. Prove the following for              .
              If         , then
        Answer:
        For            , we have        (It is true based on the given)
        For            , suppose
        Then,
        it gives              . Thus by induction for        , the inequality is true
10. Polynomial multiplication will reveal that


         If            ., we may divide both sides through by          to have


Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                                   Page 10
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra        IMPoME 2012




       This algebraic observation suggest a general formula for the sum of powers of a real
       number       . If        , then




       Prove the equation above with induction argument rooted at
       Answer:

      For        we obtain

                                   , his result is true for        ,

       Suppose        and                         , then we have




                                                                   ,

        Thus by induction for            , the equation is true
   11. Use exercise no 10 to prove the following factorization formula:


      Answer:
       Using the result no. 10 we have,




       Then,




Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                     Page 11
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra     IMPoME 2012

       Thus, we obtain




   12. If        , then                                        . Use this and induction to prove
                 for all         .
       Answer:
       For        , we obtain
       Suppose             and          , then


       The last inequality holds since                                      which holds
        for
   13. Prove the following for

        1.

        2.


Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                       Page 12
The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra            IMPoME 2012



       Answer:
      Proofs
      1) For       , we have

         For       , and suppose                          , then




           Thus, by induction for     , the equation is true.
      2) For        we have
         For        and suppose                            , then we have




          Thus, by induction for      , the equation is true.




Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar                                                       Page 13

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 2
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 2CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 2
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 2David Wood
 
CMSC 56 | Lecture 11: Mathematical Induction
CMSC 56 | Lecture 11: Mathematical InductionCMSC 56 | Lecture 11: Mathematical Induction
CMSC 56 | Lecture 11: Mathematical Inductionallyn joy calcaben
 
Maksim Zhukovskii – Zero-one k-laws for G(n,n−α)
Maksim Zhukovskii – Zero-one k-laws for G(n,n−α)Maksim Zhukovskii – Zero-one k-laws for G(n,n−α)
Maksim Zhukovskii – Zero-one k-laws for G(n,n−α)Yandex
 
Mean variance
Mean varianceMean variance
Mean varianceodkoo
 
Mathematical induction
Mathematical inductionMathematical induction
Mathematical inductionrey castro
 
Math induction principle (slides)
Math induction principle (slides)Math induction principle (slides)
Math induction principle (slides)IIUM
 
Principle of mathematical induction
Principle of mathematical inductionPrinciple of mathematical induction
Principle of mathematical inductionKriti Varshney
 
Mathematical induction
Mathematical inductionMathematical induction
Mathematical inductionSman Abbasi
 
Proofs by contraposition
Proofs by contrapositionProofs by contraposition
Proofs by contrapositionAbdur Rehman
 
alexbeloi_thesis_082715_final
alexbeloi_thesis_082715_finalalexbeloi_thesis_082715_final
alexbeloi_thesis_082715_finalAlex Beloi
 
Mathematical induction and divisibility rules
Mathematical induction and divisibility rulesMathematical induction and divisibility rules
Mathematical induction and divisibility rulesDawood Faheem Abbasi
 
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last versionSMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last versionLilyana Vankova
 
Math induction
Math inductionMath induction
Math inductionasel_d
 
Selected ch25
Selected ch25Selected ch25
Selected ch25xajo2013
 
EXPECTED NUMBER OF LEVEL CROSSINGS OF A RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIAL
EXPECTED NUMBER OF LEVEL CROSSINGS OF A RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIALEXPECTED NUMBER OF LEVEL CROSSINGS OF A RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIAL
EXPECTED NUMBER OF LEVEL CROSSINGS OF A RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIALJournal For Research
 
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)IJERD Editor
 
5.2 Strong Induction
5.2 Strong Induction5.2 Strong Induction
5.2 Strong Inductionshowslidedump
 
CMSC 56 | Lecture 5: Proofs Methods and Strategy
CMSC 56 | Lecture 5: Proofs Methods and StrategyCMSC 56 | Lecture 5: Proofs Methods and Strategy
CMSC 56 | Lecture 5: Proofs Methods and Strategyallyn joy calcaben
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 2
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 2CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 2
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 2
 
CMSC 56 | Lecture 11: Mathematical Induction
CMSC 56 | Lecture 11: Mathematical InductionCMSC 56 | Lecture 11: Mathematical Induction
CMSC 56 | Lecture 11: Mathematical Induction
 
Maksim Zhukovskii – Zero-one k-laws for G(n,n−α)
Maksim Zhukovskii – Zero-one k-laws for G(n,n−α)Maksim Zhukovskii – Zero-one k-laws for G(n,n−α)
Maksim Zhukovskii – Zero-one k-laws for G(n,n−α)
 
Mean variance
Mean varianceMean variance
Mean variance
 
5.1 Induction
5.1 Induction5.1 Induction
5.1 Induction
 
Mathematical induction
Mathematical inductionMathematical induction
Mathematical induction
 
Math induction principle (slides)
Math induction principle (slides)Math induction principle (slides)
Math induction principle (slides)
 
Principle of mathematical induction
Principle of mathematical inductionPrinciple of mathematical induction
Principle of mathematical induction
 
Mathematical induction
Mathematical inductionMathematical induction
Mathematical induction
 
Proofs by contraposition
Proofs by contrapositionProofs by contraposition
Proofs by contraposition
 
alexbeloi_thesis_082715_final
alexbeloi_thesis_082715_finalalexbeloi_thesis_082715_final
alexbeloi_thesis_082715_final
 
Mathematical induction and divisibility rules
Mathematical induction and divisibility rulesMathematical induction and divisibility rules
Mathematical induction and divisibility rules
 
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last versionSMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
 
Math induction
Math inductionMath induction
Math induction
 
Mathematical Induction DM
Mathematical Induction DMMathematical Induction DM
Mathematical Induction DM
 
Selected ch25
Selected ch25Selected ch25
Selected ch25
 
EXPECTED NUMBER OF LEVEL CROSSINGS OF A RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIAL
EXPECTED NUMBER OF LEVEL CROSSINGS OF A RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIALEXPECTED NUMBER OF LEVEL CROSSINGS OF A RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIAL
EXPECTED NUMBER OF LEVEL CROSSINGS OF A RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIAL
 
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
 
5.2 Strong Induction
5.2 Strong Induction5.2 Strong Induction
5.2 Strong Induction
 
CMSC 56 | Lecture 5: Proofs Methods and Strategy
CMSC 56 | Lecture 5: Proofs Methods and StrategyCMSC 56 | Lecture 5: Proofs Methods and Strategy
CMSC 56 | Lecture 5: Proofs Methods and Strategy
 

Ähnlich wie 2.4 edited1

5.4 mathematical induction t
5.4 mathematical induction t5.4 mathematical induction t
5.4 mathematical induction tmath260
 
Inmo 2013 test_paper_solution
Inmo 2013 test_paper_solutionInmo 2013 test_paper_solution
Inmo 2013 test_paper_solutionSuresh Kumar
 
About testing the hypothesis of equality of two bernoulli
About testing the hypothesis of equality of two bernoulliAbout testing the hypothesis of equality of two bernoulli
About testing the hypothesis of equality of two bernoulliAlexander Decker
 
Mathematical Induction
Mathematical InductionMathematical Induction
Mathematical InductionEdelyn Cagas
 
The 2 Goldbach's Conjectures with Proof
The 2 Goldbach's Conjectures with Proof The 2 Goldbach's Conjectures with Proof
The 2 Goldbach's Conjectures with Proof nikos mantzakouras
 
11X1 T10 09 mathematical induction 2
11X1 T10 09 mathematical induction 211X1 T10 09 mathematical induction 2
11X1 T10 09 mathematical induction 2Nigel Simmons
 
mathematical induction
mathematical inductionmathematical induction
mathematical inductionankush_kumar
 
11X1 T14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2011)
11X1 T14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2011)11X1 T14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2011)
11X1 T14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2011)Nigel Simmons
 
mathematical induction
mathematical inductionmathematical induction
mathematical inductionankush_kumar
 
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2012)
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2012)11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2012)
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2012)Nigel Simmons
 
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2013)
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2013)11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2013)
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2013)Nigel Simmons
 
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 1
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 1CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 1
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 1David Wood
 

Ähnlich wie 2.4 edited1 (20)

5.4 mathematical induction t
5.4 mathematical induction t5.4 mathematical induction t
5.4 mathematical induction t
 
Factorials as sums
Factorials as sumsFactorials as sums
Factorials as sums
 
Inmo 2013 test_paper_solution
Inmo 2013 test_paper_solutionInmo 2013 test_paper_solution
Inmo 2013 test_paper_solution
 
About testing the hypothesis of equality of two bernoulli
About testing the hypothesis of equality of two bernoulliAbout testing the hypothesis of equality of two bernoulli
About testing the hypothesis of equality of two bernoulli
 
Sol80
Sol80Sol80
Sol80
 
Sol80
Sol80Sol80
Sol80
 
Induction.pdf
Induction.pdfInduction.pdf
Induction.pdf
 
Chapter5.pptx
Chapter5.pptxChapter5.pptx
Chapter5.pptx
 
Cu36574580
Cu36574580Cu36574580
Cu36574580
 
Mathematical Induction
Mathematical InductionMathematical Induction
Mathematical Induction
 
The 2 Goldbach's Conjectures with Proof
The 2 Goldbach's Conjectures with Proof The 2 Goldbach's Conjectures with Proof
The 2 Goldbach's Conjectures with Proof
 
11X1 T10 09 mathematical induction 2
11X1 T10 09 mathematical induction 211X1 T10 09 mathematical induction 2
11X1 T10 09 mathematical induction 2
 
mathematical induction
mathematical inductionmathematical induction
mathematical induction
 
11X1 T14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2011)
11X1 T14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2011)11X1 T14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2011)
11X1 T14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2011)
 
mathematical induction
mathematical inductionmathematical induction
mathematical induction
 
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2012)
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2012)11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2012)
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2012)
 
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2013)
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2013)11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2013)
11 x1 t14 09 mathematical induction 2 (2013)
 
Imc2016 day1-solutions
Imc2016 day1-solutionsImc2016 day1-solutions
Imc2016 day1-solutions
 
LDP.pdf
LDP.pdfLDP.pdf
LDP.pdf
 
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 1
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 1CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 1
CPSC 125 Ch 2 Sec 1
 

2.4 edited1

  • 1. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 2.4 The Principle of Mathematical Induction Assignment from: Sri Rejeki Ahmad Wachidul Kohar 2.4.1 The standard PMI Suppose we consider a set S, which is assumed to be a subset of the natural numbers N, and suppose S is known to have the following properties: (I1) 1 ∈ S (I2) If n ≥ 1 and n ∈ S, then n + 1 ∈ S Theorem 2.4.1 (PMI). Suppose S ⊆ N has the properties that (I1) 1 ∈ S (I2) If n ≥ 1 and n ∈ S, then n + 1 ∈ S. Then S = N. Proof: Suppose S ⊆ N satisfies properties I1–I2. Suppose also that S = N. Then either S ⊆ N or N ⊆ S. But S ⊆ N is assumed, so N ⊆ S. Thus there exists n ∈ N such that n ∈/ S. If we define T = NS = N ∩ S , then T ⊆ N and n ∈ T . Thus T is a nonempty subset of the natural numbers, which, by the WOP, contains a smallest element a. Now it is impossible that a = 1 because 1 ∈ S. Thus a > 1, so that a −1 ∈ N. Furthermore, since a is the smallest element of T , it must be that a −1 ∈/ T . Thus a − 1 ∈ S. But by I2, since a − 1 ∈ S, it follows that a = (a − 1) + 1 ∈ S. But if a ∈ S, then a ∈/ T . This is a contradiction. Thus there is no smallest element of T , which means that T = ∅. Therefore, N ⊆ S, from which S = N. Theorem 2.4.2 (Sample). For all n ∈ N, P (n). Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 1. (I1) P (1). (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and P (n). Then . . . . Thus, P (n + 1). Therefore, by induction, P (n) is true for all n ∈ N. Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 1
  • 2. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 Theorem 2.4.3. For all n ∈ N, …………………………………………………………………………(2.54) Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 1. (I1) For the case n = 1, we have and 1(1 + 1)/2 = 1, so that Eq. (2.54) holds true for n = 1. (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and . Then Thus, Eq. (2.54) holds for n +1. By the PMI, it follows that Eq. (2.54) holds for all n ∈ N. Theorem 2.4.4. Suppose A, B1 , B2 ,..., Bn are sets. Then A ∪ ( B1 ∩ B2 ∩ ··· ∩ Bn ) = ( A ∪ B1 ) ∩ ( A ∪ B2 ) ∩ ··· ∩ ( A ∪ Bn )……………………(2.56) Proof: To clean up the notation, we write Eq. (2.56) as ……………………………………………………(2.57) (I1) If n = 1, then ∩k=1 Bk = B1 , so that both sides of Eq. (2.57) are simply A ∪ B1 . (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and Eq. (2.57) holds for n. Then = = Thus, Eq. (2.57) holds for n + 1. By the PMI, Eq. (2.57) holds for all n ∈ N. 2.4.2 Variation of the PMI Supposed that j is any whole number and that S ⊆ W has the following properties. (J1) j ∈ S (J2) If n ≥ j and n ∈ S, then n + 1 ∈ S. By mimicking almost word for word the proof of Theorem 2.4.1, we would have a similar PMI rooted, if you will, at j ∈ W. Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 2
  • 3. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 Theorem 2.4.6. Suppose a ∈ R{0} and m, n ∈ W. Then am · an = am+n . Proof: We prove by induction on n ≥ 0 (thinking of m as fixed). (J1) For the case n = 0, we have am · a0 = am · 1 = am = am+0 . Thus the result is true for n = 0. (J2) Suppose n ≥ 0 and am · an = am+n . We show that am · an+1 = am+(n+1) . am · an+1 = am · (an · a) = (am · an ) · a = am+n · a = a(m+n)+1 = am+(n+1) . Thus by induction, am · an = am+n for all a ∈ R{0} and m, n ∈ W. Another example of a recursive definition is the factorial. 0! = 1, (n + 1)! = (n + 1) · n! for n ≥ 0. 2.4.3 Strong Induction Suppose has the following properties. K1. K2. If and , then . Theorem 2.4.7 Suppose has the properties K1 and K2 above. Then Theorem 2.4.8 (Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic). Every natural number n ≥ 2 can be written as the product of primes, and this factorization is unique, except perhaps for the order in which the factors are written. Proof: We’ll prove only the existence part now, and save uniqueness for Section 2.7. Since 2 is prime, the result is true for n = 2. Thus let n ≥ 3 be given, and suppose all of 2, 3,..., n − 1 can be written as the product of primes. Now if n is itself prime, then its prime factorization is trivial, and the result is true. On the other hand, if n is composite, then there exist a, b ∈ N such that 1 < a, b < n and n = ab. By the inductive assumption, since 2 ≤ a, b ≤ n − 1, both a and b can be written as the product of primes. That is, a = p1 p2 ··· ps b = q1 q2 ··· qt , Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 3
  • 4. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 where all pk and qk are prime. Thus n = p1 ··· ps q1 ··· qt , and we have found a prime factorization for n. EXERCISES 1. Show that the smallest element of a nonempty subset of W is unique. Answer: Suppose that U⊂W and U≠Ø. Let a, b are smallest elements in U, where a b so c U , c a and c b , Since a b , c > b and c > a , there are possibilities a < b or a > b. It is impossible if a > b because a is smallest element in U. It is impossible if b > a because b is also smallest element in U. Therefore a = b. Thus, the smallest number in U is unique 2. Prove the following sum formulas: n a. k 1 k2 n n 1 2n 1 / 6 Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 1. 1 (I1) For the case n = 1, we have k 1 k2 1 and 1 1 1 2 1 1 / 6 1 2 3 / 6 1 , so that n k 1 k2 n n 1 2n 1 / 6 holds true for n = 1. n (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and k 1 k2 n n 1 2n 1 / 6 . Then n 1 n n n 1 2n 1 k2 k2 n 12 n 12 k 1 k 1 6 n n 1 2n 1 6 n 1 2 n 1 n 2n 1 6n 1 6 6 n 1 2n 2 7 n 6 n 1 n 2 2n 3 6 6 n Thus k 1 k2 n n 1 2n 1 / 6 holds for n + 1. n By the PMI, It follows that k 1 k2 n n 1 2n 1 / 6 holds for all n ∈ N. n b. k 1 1 k k2 1 nn n 1 /2 Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 1. 1 (I1) For the case n = 1, we have k 1 1 k k2 1 and 1 11 1 1 / 2 1, so that n k 1 1 k k2 1 n n n 1 / 2 holds true for n = 1. Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 4
  • 5. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 n (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and k 1 1 k k2 1 n n n 1 / 2 . Then n 1 n 1 nn n 1 k 1 1 k k2 k 1 1 k k2 1n 1n 1 n 12 1n 1 n 12 2 1 nn n 1 2 1n 1 n 12 1n 1 n n 1 2 1n 1 n 12 2 2 n 1 n 1 1 n 1 n 2n 1 1 n 1 n 2 2 2 n Thus k 1 1 k k2 1 n n n 1 / 2 holds for n + 1. n By the PMI, It follows that k 1 1 k k2 1 n n n 1 / 2 holds for all n ∈ N. n n 2 c. k 1 k3 k 1 k Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 1. 1 1 2 (I1) For the case n = 1, we have k 1 k3 1 and k 1 k 1, n n 2 so that k 1 k3 k 1 k holds true for n = 1. n n 2 (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and k 1 k3 k 1 k . Then 2 n 1 3 n 2 3 2 3 nn 1 k 1 k k 1 k n 1 1 2 ... n n 1 n 13 2 2 n2 n2 4n 1 n 2 n 12 n 1 n 12 n 12 4 4 4 2 n 12 n 2 2 n 1 n 2 4 2 n n 2 Thus k 1 k3 k 1 k holds for n + 1. n n 2 By the PMI, It follows that k 1 k3 k 1 k holds for all n ∈ N. n d. k 1 2k 1 n2 Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 1. 1 n (I3) For the case n = 1, we have k 1 2k 1 1 and 12 1 , so that k 1 2k 1 n2 holds true for n = 1. Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 5
  • 6. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 n (I4) Suppose n ≥ 1 and k 1 2k 1 n 2 . Then n 1 n 2k 1 2k 1 2(n 1) 1 n2 2n 1 k 1 k 1 n2 2n 1 n 12 n Thus k 1 2k 1 n 2 holds for n + 1. n By the PMI, It follows that k 1 2k 1 n 2 holds for all n ∈ N. n e. k 0 2k 2n 1 1 Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 0. 0 (I1) For the case n = 0, we have k 0 2k 1and 2 0 1 1 2 1 1, n so that k 0 2k 2n 1 1 holds true for n = 0. n (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and k 0 2k 2n 1 1 . Then n 1 n k 0 2k k 0 2k 2n 1 2n 1 1 2n 1 2 2n 1 1 2n 2 1 n Thus k 0 2k 2n 1 1 holds for n + 1. n By the PMI, It follows that k 0 2k 2n 1 1 holds for all n ∈ N. n f. k 1 1/ k k 1 n/ n 1 Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 1. 1 (I1) For the case n = 1, we have k 1 1/ k k 1 1 / 2 and 1 / 1 1 1 / 2 , so that n k 1 1/ k k 1 n / n 1 holds true for n = 1. n (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and k 1 1/ k k 1 n / n 1 . Then n 1 n n 1 k 1 1/ k k 1 k 1 1/ k k 1 1/ n 1 n 2 n 1 n 1 n 2 nn 2 1 n 2 2n 1 n 12 n 1 n 1 n 2 n 1 n 2 n 1 n 2 n 2 n Thus k 1 1/ k k 1 n / n 1 holds for n + 1. n By the PMI, It follows that k 1 1/ k k 1 n / n 1 holds for all n ∈ N. Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 6
  • 7. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 3. Suppose n ∈ N and a, b1, b2, …,bn ∈ R. Show that n n a b k 1 k k 1 abk Answer: n a b k 1 k a b1 b2 ... bn ab1 ab2 .... abn n k 1 abk 4. Suppose m, n ∈ N and a1, a2, …, am, b1, b2, …,bn ∈ R. Show that m n m n j 1 aj b k 1 k j 1 k 1 a j bk Answer: m n n j 1 aj b k 1 k a1 a2 ... a m b k 1 k n n n a1 b k 1 k a2 b k 1 k ... a m b k 1 k n n n ab k 1 1 1 a b k 1 2 k ... a b k 1 m k m n j 1 k 1 a j bk n n 5. Suppose a1, a2, …, an ∈ R. Show that k a 1 k k 1 ak Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 1. 1 a1 , if a1 0 (I1) For the case n = 1, we have a k 1 k a1 and a1 , if a1 0 1 a1 , if a1 0 k 1 ak a1 a1 , if a1 0 n n so that a k 1 k k 1 ak holds true for n = 1. n n (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and a k 1 k k 1 ak . Then n 1 n a k 1 k a k 1 k a k 1 , by theorem2.3.22 n n a k 1 k ak 1 k 1 ak ak 1 n 1 k 1 ak Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 7
  • 8. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 n n Thus a k 1 k k 1 ak holds for n + 1. 6. Prove Eqs. (2.61) and (2.62) for a, b, ∈ R{0} and m, n ∈ W. Proof: n am a mn Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 0 (thinking of m as fixed). n 0 n (I1) For the case n = 0, we have a m am 1 and a m.0 1 , so that a m a mn holds true for n = 0. n n 1 (I2) Suppose n ≥ 0 and a m a mn . We have show that a m a m( n 1) . n 1 n am am am a mn a m a mn m a m( n 1) n Thus a m a mn holds for n + 1. n By the PMI, It follows that a m a mn holds for all n ∈ N. n ab a nb n Proof: We use induction on n ≥ 0 (thinking of m as fixed). 0 n (I1) For the case n = 0, we have ab 1 and a 0b 0 1 1 1 , so that ab a nb n holds true for n = 0. n n 1 (I2) Suppose n ≥ 0 and ab a nb n . We have show that ab a n 1b n 1 . n 1 n ab ab ab a n b n ab a n a bn b a n 1b n 1 n Thus ab a nb n holds for n + 1. a nb n holds for all n ∈ N. n By the PMI, It follows that ab n 7. For x ∈ R{0} and n ∈ N, define x x1 n This exercise will show that the rules for exponents in Eqs. (2.60) – (2.62) hold for all a, b ∈ R{0} and m,n ∈ Z. n 1 a. Show that a an for all n W . Answer: 1 1 1 (I1) For the case n = 1, we have a a1 a 1 , so that a n an holds true for n = 1. n 1 1 (I2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and a an . We have show that a ( n 1) an 1 .. ( n 1) 1 n 1 1 a a an 1 1 an 1 n 1 Thus a an holds for n + 1. Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 8
  • 9. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 1 By the PMI, It follows that a n an holds for all n ∈ N. b. Show that a m a n a m n for all m,n ∈ W. Answer: m n m ( n) m n a a a a c. Show that a m a n am n for all m,n ∈ W. Answer: ama n am ( n) am n n d. Show that a m a mn for all m,n ∈ W. Answer: m n Using 2.61 a a( m)( n ) , based on the second point of theorem 2.3.6 a mn n e. Show that a m a mn for all m,n ∈ W. Answer: n Using 2.61 a m a ( m)( n) , based on the theorem 2.3.7 a ( m) 1 (n) , using A11 (commutative property of multiplication) 1 mn a , based on the theorem 2.3.7 m n f. Show that a a mn for all m,n ∈ W. Answer: m n Using 2.61 a a( m)( n ) , based on the first point of theorem 2.3.6 mn a , based on the theorem 2.3.7 a( 1) mn mn a n g. Show that ab a nb n for all m,n ∈ W. Answer: n Using 2.62 ab a nb n 8. Suppose and . Prove the following. a) Answer: For , . This result is true for Suppose and . We show that Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 9
  • 10. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 , Thus by induction for , the equation is true b) : For , . This result is true for , and Suppose and . We show that . , Thus by induction for , the equation is true 9. Prove the following for . If , then Answer: For , we have (It is true based on the given) For , suppose Then, it gives . Thus by induction for , the inequality is true 10. Polynomial multiplication will reveal that If ., we may divide both sides through by to have Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 10
  • 11. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 This algebraic observation suggest a general formula for the sum of powers of a real number . If , then Prove the equation above with induction argument rooted at Answer: For we obtain , his result is true for , Suppose and , then we have , Thus by induction for , the equation is true 11. Use exercise no 10 to prove the following factorization formula: Answer: Using the result no. 10 we have, Then, Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 11
  • 12. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 Thus, we obtain 12. If , then . Use this and induction to prove for all . Answer: For , we obtain Suppose and , then The last inequality holds since which holds for 13. Prove the following for 1. 2. Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 12
  • 13. The 3rd Report of Abstract Agebra IMPoME 2012 Answer: Proofs 1) For , we have For , and suppose , then Thus, by induction for , the equation is true. 2) For we have For and suppose , then we have Thus, by induction for , the equation is true. Sri Rejeki and Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Page 13