SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 25
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Case Study:
RBI and its Application to
Inspection of
DHTU Flare Knockout Drums
AS3788 Pressure equipment – In-service inspection

n   Mandatory under NSW Occupational Health & Safety Regulation 2001
n   Mandates maximum periods between internal inspections (Table 4.1)
    eg.
Notional risk increase with extended inspection date
                                                                                                 100
                                   Risk @ 2008
                                   Risk @ 2006
                                                                                          High
                                   Acceptable Risk Level (ALARP)

                                                                                                 75

                                                                              Medium-High
      Risk Ranking




                                                                                                 50

                                                                                       Medium



                                                                                                 25
                                                                                          Low



                                                                                                 0
                     1C-1

                            1C-2

                                    1D-1

                                           1D-2

                                                  1D-3

                                                         1D-4

                                                                1D-5

                                                                       1D-6

                                                                                1D-7

                                                                                         1D-8
Statutory inspection v. Risk based inspection
                       100

                                                         Relative Risk

                                                         Statutory Inspection Level

                                                         Optimum (Risk Based) Inspection Level
                       75
       Relative Risk




                       50




                       25




                        0
                             1C-1



                                    1C-2



                                           1D-1



                                                  1D-2



                                                              1D-3



                                                                     1D-4



                                                                            1D-5



                                                                                      1D-6



                                                                                             1D-7



                                                                                                    1D-8
Statutory inspection v. Risk based inspection

n   AS3788 advocates regular visual inspection, which may not
    adequately address all deterioration modes. It does not quantify
    the value of inspection techniques for mitigating risks other than
    thickness loss.
    eg. for Inspection Periods & Remaining Life Assessment, AS3788
        is quantitative with regard to “Wastage” (para. 4.4.4.4,
        Appendix N), but qualitative with regard to environmental
        cracking & other deterioration modes (Appendix O concerns
        Fitness for Service, not Remaining Life)

n   API581 quantifies most available inspection techniques in
    terms of their effectiveness at reducing a range of
    deterioration modes
Risk Based Inspection


  “RBI may … be validly
   used … to modify some
   of [the AS3788]
   prescriptive
   requirements…”
                        (AS3788 App.B)
What is Risk Based Inspection (RBI)?
n   “A way to extend runlengths/save maintenance $$$”

n   A method of using equipment history and the likely consequences
    of equipment failure to determine Inspection regimes focused on
    actual risks, so as to prevent unsafe incidents occurring

n   The RBI method is based on the API 581 base resource document
     – 23 major oil & petrochemical companies
     – massive statistical analysis of petrochem facilities over a number of years
     – “complex and … best suited for use in a computerized form”

n   Each piece of equipment is assigned a risk ranking based on the
    Probability and Consequence of a failure (loss of containment)
RBI principles – API 581

n Consequence            (loss of containment)
n   Flammability
                              Not influenced by inspection!
n   Toxicity
n   Production loss


n Probability         – deterioration modes
n   Internal corrosion
n   External corrosion        Can reduce by effective inspection
n   Environmental cracking (eg. stress corrosion, hydrogen induced)
Typical risk matrix
Uninspectable risk
n Cannot   reduce risk to zero!
   – Human error
   – Natural disasters
   – External events (eg. falling objects)
   – Secondary effects from other nearby failures
   – Deliberate acts, sabotage
   – Fundamental limitations of inspection methods
   – Design errors
   – Previously unknown mechanisms of deterioration
Can inspection extend the life of an asset?
n Can’tinspect good condition back into equipment at
  end of life! (API581 9.3.3.3d)
n However…we      don’t arbitrarily retire equipment at the
  end of its design life
n Inspection and recertification are crucial to maximising
  the service life of equipment
45C-612 & 45C-612A – inspection history
n   C-612                             n   C-612A
    – in service Oct 1978                 – Feb 1980: visual
    – Feb 1980: visual                    – Aug 1982: visual
    – May 1983: visual                    – Jun 1985: visual
    – Sep 1987: visual (internally        – Jan 1989: visual (internally
      coated)                               coated)
    – Sep 1991: visual                    – Jan 1992: visual, MPI
    – Sep 1995: visual                    – Apr 1996: visual, MPI
    – Feb 2002: visual

          45C-612A is the vessel due for inspection based on time
45C-612A – history of incidents

H2S release on attempting to open for inspection
n   Mar 2002
n   Sep 2003

Inspection requested to assess possibility of extending run via
external inspection techniques
45C-612 & 45C-612A – base data

n   Process: flare gas – water + ~2% H2S, ie. sour service
n   Post Weld Heat Treated (stress relieved)
n   Design: 350kPa & 450oC
n   Operating: 55kPa & ~75oC
n   Uninsulated
n   Internally coated from ~10 years into service life
n   Measured average general Corrosion Rate ~0.05mm/yr
n   Remaining Life from general corrosion (“wastage”) >>20yrs
n   Pitting Corrosion Rate ~0.5mm/yr prior to internal coating, now largely
    mitigated
45C-612 & 45C-612A – application of RBI

Via use of Capstone RBMI program:
n   External corrosion risk low – uninsulated, external coating good
n   Internal corrosion risk low – reflects in CR & RL calculation
n   For water + 20,000ppm H2S & PWHT, API 581 App.H assigns Low
    susceptibility to Wet H2S cracking è entered into Capstone RBMI
n   “Low” is not zero! Capstone RBMI calculates:
     – Medium risk of cracking for C-612A, because of MPI testing in April
       1996
     – Medium-High risk of cracking for C-612, because it had never been
       inspected for cracking
Aside – effectiveness of stress relief (PWHT)


US experience (large statistical sample):
n   History of cracking in SR/PWHT vessels
n   Loosely specified
n   Inadequate QA
45C-612 & 45C-612A – application of RBI

n 45C-612   is the vessel due for inspection based
 on risk
n 45C-612A    is the vessel due for inspection based
 on time
n Cracking, rather than corrosion, is the highest
 risk for both vessels
n Visualinspection does not effectively address
 cracking
45C-612 & 45C-612A – calculated risk levels @ 2003

        45C-612                      45C-612A
45C-612 & 45C-612A – 2003 inspection regime

n   45C-612:
    Ø external shearwave UT of 100% of welds
    è Highly Effective inspection for Wet H2S cracking per API 581 Table H-4C
    è no defects
n   45C-612A:
    Ø spot external thickness gauging
    è Fairly Effective inspection for Thinning per API 581 Table G-6A
    è confirms low corrosion rate
    Ø credit claimed for representative cracking inspection
    è AS3788 4.4.4.6 allows representative inspection of parallel equipment
    è Usually Effective inspection for Wet H2S cracking per API 581 Table G-6A (one
      level lower than for vessel inspected)
45C-612 & 45C-612A - results

n   Reduction in OH&S risk (H2S       45C-612 & C-612A risk @ 2011
    exposure)
n   Saving & deferral of
    estimated $60K expenditure
n   Inspection period for both
    vessels extended to 2011
    with no significant increase in
    risk
    (Capstone RBMI “What if?”
    analysis - lookahead)
45C-612 & 45C-612A - lessons

n Corrosion is not the only, or even the most important,
 deterioration mechanism – this leads to some (initially)
 surprising results
n Visualinspection may not be the best way to mitigate all
 deterioration risks – can do an “effective” inspection
 without entry
n PWHT  may not eliminate the risk of environmental
 cracking!
n API 581 allows quantification & comparison of cracking
 risk with other risks
45C-612 & 45C-612A - postscript

n Internalinspection of 45C-612 & 45C-612A as part of
  Kurnell Clean Fuels upgrade
n Found   cracking in 45C-612
   – Fabrication defects?
   – Missed by shearwave, or appeared since 2003?
n Justifies   requirement for crack testing
n Capstone   RBMI has an Inspection Planning tool (Last
  Date, Frequency, calculated Next Date) & reporting
  functions to ensure appropriate testing is done at
  suitable intervals
Benefits of Risk Based Inspection

n5   year plant T&I schedule for 2004 on based on RBI
n Various   plant runlength extensions granted
n Estimated   saving…

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Caltex Rbi

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisFailure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect Analysistulasiva
 
NEN_SIL Platform_Risk matrix guide
NEN_SIL Platform_Risk matrix guideNEN_SIL Platform_Risk matrix guide
NEN_SIL Platform_Risk matrix guideRianne Boek
 
1. safety instrumented systems
1. safety instrumented systems1. safety instrumented systems
1. safety instrumented systemsSaiful Chowdhury
 
Risk assessment in Oil and gas retail outlets: strategy for DPR Nigeria
Risk assessment in Oil and gas retail outlets: strategy for DPR NigeriaRisk assessment in Oil and gas retail outlets: strategy for DPR Nigeria
Risk assessment in Oil and gas retail outlets: strategy for DPR NigeriaYusuf Rigasa
 
Safety — Key to the Machine Solution
Safety — Key to the Machine SolutionSafety — Key to the Machine Solution
Safety — Key to the Machine SolutionSchneider Electric
 
Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts
Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts
Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts Mike Boudreaux
 
Rbi masterclass fleming summit_ss
Rbi masterclass fleming summit_ssRbi masterclass fleming summit_ss
Rbi masterclass fleming summit_ssGaneshraju
 

Ähnlich wie Caltex Rbi (8)

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisFailure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
 
NEN_SIL Platform_Risk matrix guide
NEN_SIL Platform_Risk matrix guideNEN_SIL Platform_Risk matrix guide
NEN_SIL Platform_Risk matrix guide
 
1. safety instrumented systems
1. safety instrumented systems1. safety instrumented systems
1. safety instrumented systems
 
Risk assessment in Oil and gas retail outlets: strategy for DPR Nigeria
Risk assessment in Oil and gas retail outlets: strategy for DPR NigeriaRisk assessment in Oil and gas retail outlets: strategy for DPR Nigeria
Risk assessment in Oil and gas retail outlets: strategy for DPR Nigeria
 
Safety — Key to the Machine Solution
Safety — Key to the Machine SolutionSafety — Key to the Machine Solution
Safety — Key to the Machine Solution
 
Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts
Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts
Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts
 
FMEA.pptx
FMEA.pptxFMEA.pptx
FMEA.pptx
 
Rbi masterclass fleming summit_ss
Rbi masterclass fleming summit_ssRbi masterclass fleming summit_ss
Rbi masterclass fleming summit_ss
 

Mehr von arindam_baral

Mehr von arindam_baral (6)

90 10 Principle
90 10 Principle90 10 Principle
90 10 Principle
 
Indias Future Gurcharan Das
Indias Future   Gurcharan DasIndias Future   Gurcharan Das
Indias Future Gurcharan Das
 
Quit Smoking
Quit SmokingQuit Smoking
Quit Smoking
 
Chest Pain
Chest PainChest Pain
Chest Pain
 
Eye Protection
Eye ProtectionEye Protection
Eye Protection
 
Corrosion Circuits
Corrosion CircuitsCorrosion Circuits
Corrosion Circuits
 

Caltex Rbi

  • 1. Case Study: RBI and its Application to Inspection of DHTU Flare Knockout Drums
  • 2. AS3788 Pressure equipment – In-service inspection n Mandatory under NSW Occupational Health & Safety Regulation 2001 n Mandates maximum periods between internal inspections (Table 4.1) eg.
  • 3. Notional risk increase with extended inspection date 100 Risk @ 2008 Risk @ 2006 High Acceptable Risk Level (ALARP) 75 Medium-High Risk Ranking 50 Medium 25 Low 0 1C-1 1C-2 1D-1 1D-2 1D-3 1D-4 1D-5 1D-6 1D-7 1D-8
  • 4. Statutory inspection v. Risk based inspection 100 Relative Risk Statutory Inspection Level Optimum (Risk Based) Inspection Level 75 Relative Risk 50 25 0 1C-1 1C-2 1D-1 1D-2 1D-3 1D-4 1D-5 1D-6 1D-7 1D-8
  • 5. Statutory inspection v. Risk based inspection n AS3788 advocates regular visual inspection, which may not adequately address all deterioration modes. It does not quantify the value of inspection techniques for mitigating risks other than thickness loss. eg. for Inspection Periods & Remaining Life Assessment, AS3788 is quantitative with regard to “Wastage” (para. 4.4.4.4, Appendix N), but qualitative with regard to environmental cracking & other deterioration modes (Appendix O concerns Fitness for Service, not Remaining Life) n API581 quantifies most available inspection techniques in terms of their effectiveness at reducing a range of deterioration modes
  • 6. Risk Based Inspection “RBI may … be validly used … to modify some of [the AS3788] prescriptive requirements…” (AS3788 App.B)
  • 7. What is Risk Based Inspection (RBI)? n “A way to extend runlengths/save maintenance $$$” n A method of using equipment history and the likely consequences of equipment failure to determine Inspection regimes focused on actual risks, so as to prevent unsafe incidents occurring n The RBI method is based on the API 581 base resource document – 23 major oil & petrochemical companies – massive statistical analysis of petrochem facilities over a number of years – “complex and … best suited for use in a computerized form” n Each piece of equipment is assigned a risk ranking based on the Probability and Consequence of a failure (loss of containment)
  • 8. RBI principles – API 581 n Consequence (loss of containment) n Flammability Not influenced by inspection! n Toxicity n Production loss n Probability – deterioration modes n Internal corrosion n External corrosion Can reduce by effective inspection n Environmental cracking (eg. stress corrosion, hydrogen induced)
  • 10. Uninspectable risk n Cannot reduce risk to zero! – Human error – Natural disasters – External events (eg. falling objects) – Secondary effects from other nearby failures – Deliberate acts, sabotage – Fundamental limitations of inspection methods – Design errors – Previously unknown mechanisms of deterioration
  • 11. Can inspection extend the life of an asset? n Can’tinspect good condition back into equipment at end of life! (API581 9.3.3.3d) n However…we don’t arbitrarily retire equipment at the end of its design life n Inspection and recertification are crucial to maximising the service life of equipment
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14. 45C-612 & 45C-612A – inspection history n C-612 n C-612A – in service Oct 1978 – Feb 1980: visual – Feb 1980: visual – Aug 1982: visual – May 1983: visual – Jun 1985: visual – Sep 1987: visual (internally – Jan 1989: visual (internally coated) coated) – Sep 1991: visual – Jan 1992: visual, MPI – Sep 1995: visual – Apr 1996: visual, MPI – Feb 2002: visual 45C-612A is the vessel due for inspection based on time
  • 15. 45C-612A – history of incidents H2S release on attempting to open for inspection n Mar 2002 n Sep 2003 Inspection requested to assess possibility of extending run via external inspection techniques
  • 16. 45C-612 & 45C-612A – base data n Process: flare gas – water + ~2% H2S, ie. sour service n Post Weld Heat Treated (stress relieved) n Design: 350kPa & 450oC n Operating: 55kPa & ~75oC n Uninsulated n Internally coated from ~10 years into service life n Measured average general Corrosion Rate ~0.05mm/yr n Remaining Life from general corrosion (“wastage”) >>20yrs n Pitting Corrosion Rate ~0.5mm/yr prior to internal coating, now largely mitigated
  • 17. 45C-612 & 45C-612A – application of RBI Via use of Capstone RBMI program: n External corrosion risk low – uninsulated, external coating good n Internal corrosion risk low – reflects in CR & RL calculation n For water + 20,000ppm H2S & PWHT, API 581 App.H assigns Low susceptibility to Wet H2S cracking è entered into Capstone RBMI n “Low” is not zero! Capstone RBMI calculates: – Medium risk of cracking for C-612A, because of MPI testing in April 1996 – Medium-High risk of cracking for C-612, because it had never been inspected for cracking
  • 18. Aside – effectiveness of stress relief (PWHT) US experience (large statistical sample): n History of cracking in SR/PWHT vessels n Loosely specified n Inadequate QA
  • 19. 45C-612 & 45C-612A – application of RBI n 45C-612 is the vessel due for inspection based on risk n 45C-612A is the vessel due for inspection based on time n Cracking, rather than corrosion, is the highest risk for both vessels n Visualinspection does not effectively address cracking
  • 20. 45C-612 & 45C-612A – calculated risk levels @ 2003 45C-612 45C-612A
  • 21. 45C-612 & 45C-612A – 2003 inspection regime n 45C-612: Ø external shearwave UT of 100% of welds è Highly Effective inspection for Wet H2S cracking per API 581 Table H-4C è no defects n 45C-612A: Ø spot external thickness gauging è Fairly Effective inspection for Thinning per API 581 Table G-6A è confirms low corrosion rate Ø credit claimed for representative cracking inspection è AS3788 4.4.4.6 allows representative inspection of parallel equipment è Usually Effective inspection for Wet H2S cracking per API 581 Table G-6A (one level lower than for vessel inspected)
  • 22. 45C-612 & 45C-612A - results n Reduction in OH&S risk (H2S 45C-612 & C-612A risk @ 2011 exposure) n Saving & deferral of estimated $60K expenditure n Inspection period for both vessels extended to 2011 with no significant increase in risk (Capstone RBMI “What if?” analysis - lookahead)
  • 23. 45C-612 & 45C-612A - lessons n Corrosion is not the only, or even the most important, deterioration mechanism – this leads to some (initially) surprising results n Visualinspection may not be the best way to mitigate all deterioration risks – can do an “effective” inspection without entry n PWHT may not eliminate the risk of environmental cracking! n API 581 allows quantification & comparison of cracking risk with other risks
  • 24. 45C-612 & 45C-612A - postscript n Internalinspection of 45C-612 & 45C-612A as part of Kurnell Clean Fuels upgrade n Found cracking in 45C-612 – Fabrication defects? – Missed by shearwave, or appeared since 2003? n Justifies requirement for crack testing n Capstone RBMI has an Inspection Planning tool (Last Date, Frequency, calculated Next Date) & reporting functions to ensure appropriate testing is done at suitable intervals
  • 25. Benefits of Risk Based Inspection n5 year plant T&I schedule for 2004 on based on RBI n Various plant runlength extensions granted n Estimated saving…