Presentation given by Anglee Leviner at the 2012 Carolina Sleep Society Fall Meeting.
Page 26 note:
"I have heard countless times the point driven home that the RST isn’t ‘real’ or isn’t ‘legitimate’ or other similar phrasings because it’s not NCCA accredited. I’m going to go ahead and remind you guys that the BRPT exam gained NCCA accreditation in 2002, and many, many technologists were credentialed by the BRPT 2 years prior to that and the years they were still within the APT, and to continue insisting the passing of an unaccredited examination is somehow less or unacceptable is to say that a large number of very qualified and experienced sleep professionals have an RPSGT credential that is somehow less than everyone credentialed after 2002. As the time table it took the BRPT to gain NCCA accreditation hasn’t passed yet, it’s only fair to give the ABSM an equal amount of time to accomplish this task."
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
New Developments for the RST Credentialing Exam
1. New Developments For
the RST Credentialing
Exam
Information for the Sleep
Technologist, and answers to
pressing questions.
Presented by: Anglee Leviner, RPSGT, RST
September 6th, 2012
2. AAST Mission & Vision
Mission
To promote and advance the sleep technology profession through the continued
development of educational, technical and clinical excellence in sleep disorders
Vision
To preserve the autonomy and future of the sleep technology profession by
providing educational and professional pathways with innovative
approaches that promote professional growth and development
Values
Make a difference in the quality of care provided by our members
Respond to our members needs with service programs founded with integrity
Provide quality products and services
Conduct business in an ethical and professional manner
Be accessible and accountable to our members
Treat individuals with compassion, respect, dignity and fairness
Value individual contribution in an atmosphere of teamwork and collaboration
Encourage open communication and welcome diversity of opinions
3. History of the American Board of
Sleep Medicine
Began in 1978 as a committee of the American Academy of Sleep
Medicine. (Just like the BRPT was once an APT committee)
First examination for sleep medicine specialists given under the
direction of Mary Carskadon, Ph.D., Christian Guilleminault, M.D.,
Peter Hauri, Ph.D., Milton Kramer, M.D. and Tom Roth, Ph.D.
(Pioneers of the industry and field we have the pleasure of working
in)
Twenty one sleep medicine specialists sat for the first examination
window.
4. History of the American Board of
Sleep Medicine
ABSM was established as an independent entity in 1991.
As a self-designated board the ABSM was unable to attain
Medicare and private insurer recognition of sleep medicine in
many states.
There was a designed effort to transition fellowship training
programs to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical
Education and certification to the American Board of Medical
Specialties.
The ABMS (American Board of Medical Specialties) examination
in sleep medicine reflects maturation of the field and has led to
enhanced recognition of sleep specialists by insurers and the
public as well as financial support from the medical
establishment.
6. Executive Board
The 10-member Executive Board
of the ABSM consists of
distinguished sleep medicine
physicians in education, research
and clinical practice; behavioral
sleep medicine specialists in
research and clinical practice; and
sleep technologists active in the
profession.
7. Board of Directors
Nathaniel F.Watson, MD Sam A. Fleishman, MD
(President) (Member-at-Large)
Timothy I. Morgenthaler, MD Susan Redline, MD
(Secretary-Treasurer) (Member-at-Large)
Amy Aronsky, DO Ilene Rosen, MD
(Member-at-Large) (Member-at-Large)
M. Safwan Badr, MD Steven A. Shea, PhD
(Member-at-Large) (Member-at-Large)
Ronald Chervin, MD Patrick J, Strollo Jr., MD
(Member-at-Large) (Member-at-Large)
Nancy A. Collop, MD Merrill Wise, MD
(Member-at-Large) (Member-at-Large)
**Per 2011 990 IRS form
8. RST Exam Committee
The American Board of
Sleep Medicine’s
(ABSM) Sleep
Technologist Registry
Examination was
developed by a Sleep
Technologist
Examination
Committee comprised
of senior members of
the sleep technology
profession and the
sleep medicine field.
9. Examination Development
Labs hire technologists based on a set of specific criteria
and competencies. These may vary from organization to
organization. Ultimately, those doing the hiring decide
what competencies they expect from their potential staff
choices.
CAAHEP programs and other educational sources devise
programs which instruct students on these required
competencies.
Exam writing committee drafts questions which verify the
successful understanding and application of these required
competencies.
(You’ve all seen the dog diagram?)
10. More than one way to skin a cat?
BRPT Samples technologists ABSM surveys management to
via a job task analysis, which determine what competencies
is used to determine the they expect technologists to
most relevant topics to test possess in order to be
the competency of employed. Then ensure these
examination applicants. competencies are being
covered in course curriculums,
and draft examination
(This may have an inherent hindrance
of stagnating change and preventing
questions to test those
the evolution of the field.) competencies.
(Some are concerned with the efficacy
behind contacting an appropriate
cross-section of employers in this
method.)
11. Subjectivity
Opinions
are
not
always
mutually
exclusive!
12. What’s different about the
RST exam?
“The blueprint of the ABSM exam will reflect the skills that
are taught by CAAHEP-accredited sleep technology
programs, focusing uniquely on the day-to-day professional
responsibilities of sleep technologists in the sleep center
setting. Written by an expert examination committee, the
exam questions will place a strong emphasis on practical
clinical relevance, which will make the exam an effective
gauge of a candidate's immediate readiness to assist in
the education, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of
sleep disorders patients.”
--Nathaniel F. Watson, MD, MSc
(Full article found on
http://www.sleepreviewmag.com/issues/articles/2011-06_07.asp)
13. What’s different about the
RST exam?
“The Sleep Technologist Certification Examination was created
because the ABSM had a desire to align the educational offerings
of CAAHEP-accredited sleep technologist training programs with
the material that's tested, and have those two things dovetail with
the real world job description of a sleep technologist. We're trying
to marry these three things: the technologist's job, the sleep
technologist's education that is currently being offered to
train these individuals to perform the job, and to have the
test be on material that's consistent with those two
entities.
We're astutely interested in making sure that our test is
consistent with the job that the technologists do and with the
training that they get. For a technologist who is interested in
getting a credential that is just representative of those aspects of
their career, then our credential would be the one for them.
We're not interested in testing things that are outside the
scope of work of a technologist. We don't have
expectations for technologists to understand aspects of
sleep medicine that are outside the scope of their job.”
-Nathaniel Watson, MD
14. Practical VS Theory
Examples of Practical Examples of Theory
Electrode placement CO2 retention in OHS patients
Correct filter settings Use of dead space to improve
Titration protocols gas exchange
Patient education Normal ranges of blood gases
Trouble-shooting low-quality Hypercapnic/Hypocapnic
signals Optimal tidal volumes
Stage identification Thalamic functions
Scoring per AASM guidelines Effects of Bi-polar disorder on
Application of O2 per doctor’s sleep
orders. Pharmaceutical effects on
sleep
15. I failed the NC DMV practice theory
test…
I can’t pass the written,
but I can nail a K-turn
and parallel park (barely)
on the road test, so HA!
16. Why should we have two
exams?
“When we reflect, we are guided by our knowledge
of truths about the world. By contrast, when we
act, we are guided by our knowledge of how to
perform various actions. If these are distinct
cognitive capacities, then knowing how to do
something is not knowledge of a fact — that is,
there is a distinction between practical and
theoretical knowledge.” -Jason Stanley, “The Practical and the
Theoretical”
“I can’t explain to you how or why it works, but I
can perform the task correctly every time.” Says
the employee.
17. RST Pathways
Graduates of CAAHEP or CoARC programs.
A-STEP introductory program and modules with on-the-job
training.
Minimum experience in an AASM-accredited sleep center includes:
1. Independent performance of 50 overnight sleep studies
2. Of the 50 overnight sleep studies, a minimum of 20 must include CPAP titration
3. Performance of one Multiple Sleep Latency Test
(The experience must be obtained over a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 3 years.)
Health Professionals
Medical degree, Doctoral level degree, Physician Assistants (Pas), Nursing degree (RN or LPN);
Allied health credential including Respiratory Care (RRT, CRT), Electroneurodiagnostics (R.EEG.T.,
R. EP.T, CNIM); Paramedic (EMT-P); or Radiology (RT, RT(R), RT(CT), RT(BD))
Minimum experience in an AASM-accredited sleep center includes:
1. Independent performance of 25 overnight sleep studies
2. Of the 25 overnight sleep studies, a minimum of 10 must include CPAP titration
3. Performance of one Multiple Sleep Latency Test
4. Participation in one quarter (3 months) of the center’s inter-scorer reliability meeting
the center’s minimal standards for concordance with the gold standard scorer
18. Why Grandfathering?
Grandfather Clause:
“Any policy or rule that exempts a group of
individuals, organizations, or drugs from
meeting new standards or regulations—
e.g., when a new subspecialty board in
internal medicine is created, the physicians
practicing in that area may be
‘grandfathered’ into the subspecialty and
not required to meet residency or other
educational requirements.”
(‘Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine’ by Joseph Segen)
19. Why AASM-accredited sleep
centers?
Quality control!
How else can the proper
application of AASM
standards be proven?
Requiring experience from
labs already monitored by
the AASM prevents
continued spread of
improper practices and
incorrect training.
Are panda bears part of the recommended
Standards and Guidelines?!
20. Examination Statistics
The first RST examination was offered on
November 11, 2011
Nineteen applicants met the eligibility
criteria and sat for the examination
Sixteen candidates passed the
examination and earned the RST
credential
21. The Testing Science
The ABSM is utilizing an independent statistician from
the University of Illinois at Chicago to review
examinations for data integrity and to determine the
cut point (passing score) for exams and question
reliability.
A point by serial formula to determine questions with
poor reliability is being used. Questions where exam
takers are either correct or wrong 90% of the time are
removed from the exam question bank.
The ABSM discarded 7 questions from the 2011 RST
examination due to this formula. This will keep
questions which are both too easy and too difficult out
of the examination permanently, providing perpetual
improvement of the exam content.
22. Who is involved?
A broad representation of stakeholders is included in the
examination process.
The Sleep Technologist Examination Committee is
composed of senior members in the fields of Sleep
Technology and Sleep Medicine.
An Advisory Committee reviews the content of the
examination and the statistical analyses used to determine
cut points and retention of questions.
The Advisory Committee includes trainees, active Sleep
Technologists, Sleep Technology educators, employers of
Sleep Technologists, Sleep Medicine specialists and patient
representation. The examination process is constantly
under review in order to insure a fair and balanced
outcome.
(ABSM Candidate Handbook)
24. Future Planning
In 2011 the ABSM convened the Sleep Technologist
Examination Committee to develop examinations that
certify:
That successful candidates are prepared to begin training for a
career in Sleep Technology and;
At the conclusion of the training are qualified to serve as Sleep
Technologists.
These examinations are the Certified Sleep Technologist
Trainee Examination and the Sleep Technologist Registry
Examination.
25. Test Planning
Question writing session this summer to evaluate
examination and write new questions.
The next RST examination window will be offered
August 11 – September 7, 2012.
Examination will be 150 questions over 4 hours.
The examination will be web-based and offered at
a host site of their testing partner, Kryterion.
26. Will the RST be a real boy?
NCCA Accreditation!
The ABSM is a member of the Institute for
Credentialing Excellence (ICE).
The ABSM has stated their plans to apply
to ICE for NCCA certification.
The ABSM states they will submit a letter
of intention.
***
27. RST Replacing the RPSGT?
How does the development of the new exam
impact my RPSGT credential?
-It does not. The RPSGT credential is held by over 17,000
technologists in 32 countries. It is recognized in state
legislative and regulatory language in a number of states; it
is incorporated into a range of CMS reimbursement
guidelines. It is widely recognized and respected in the
broader sleep community, accredited by NCCA, and fully
supported by BRPT. -(BRPT FAQ)
We need a practical-oriented exam beside a theory-oriented
exam, this allows those who are abnormally weak on one or
the other a second option to gain their credential.
So, let us credential people who know how to do their job,
and let us promote people who know why they do their job.
28. Who’s right, or who’s wrong?
Is the wrong question.
This isn’t a competition.
Let go of a natural fear of change; block out
your predispositions; and assess the actions,
quality and efficiency of the ABSM
examination on it’s own merit.
Hinweis der Redaktion
I do not work for the ABSM or AASM and cannot answer all questions.
Reminder that our technologist organization has always supported multiple credentialing pathways – RRT-SDS wasn’t boycotted by the AAST.
So in 2006 the ABSM ceased being the sole provider of the physician’s sleep certification examination. This freed up time and resources to begin working on new projects, such as the RST.
According to IRS 990 forms, the members of this board are completely uncompensated and averaged no more than an hour of work per week in 2011. Do you really think they could single-handedly design an exam, an all physician written exam in that little of time spent doing board obligations? Obviously the board of directors sticks to the paper pushing and procedures that all nonprofits have to keep up with – not test writing. (RE: the conspiracy of identical board members) The current active members of the AASM BoD ran the skeleton operation that was the ABSM from 2007 through 2010 because they were offering no exams after giving the physician certification over to the ABMS. They had little upkeep and no reason to employ or throw away money on what amounted to less than an hour a week of effort. Now that the ABSM is offering exams once again - they have a new board, who can provide the time and efforts required that folks spending terms on the AASM board cannot spare. Current list of BoD for ABSM - Bradley Vaughn, Carol Rosen, Madeleine Grigg-Damberger, Andrew Jamieson, Susan Harding, Thomas Hurwitz, Nancy Collop, David White, Sigrid Veasey, A. Clete Kushida RPSGT
So the exam is written by technologists and doctors. Yes physicians are involved, by proxy, and you could even say they’re supervising the exam development, but they are not in any technical or figurative way – solely writing the exam.
We’re going to touch on inspiration for the exam, as well as goals in mind during it’s development. And perhaps touch on some of the core differences between it an the RPSGT exam – though I’d like to avoid comparing the two for any continued length of time -Hiring managers decide what they expect their technologists to know and be capable of. Some more skeptical organizations may even quiz their candidates to ensure they retain the knowledge required to perform the job well. If you cannot get hired, what good is the credential? -Our education programs design curriculums based on what we have claimed and carved out as our scope of practice within polysomnography. We have defined our jobs, our jobs do not define themselves. So the exam was designed to test applicants on the knowledge instructed to them in our educational programs. However the field evolves from here: We define it, we teach it, and we test understanding of it.
This is a decidedly very different way of determining test composition. BRPT – We’re going to test on topics that you might not be learning about in school at all, but since surveyed techs out there are doing it, we think you should know it. This inherently offers the problem of an exam being based on the actions and work habits of techs who’ve had years of continued education and advanced training. Everything should start with education, and I believe that exams should be based on that education, and not education be based on exams.
I’m not hear to say which test is better, just to inform those that are confused, frustrated, or curious about the details of the new exam.
Practical: this is a word and concept that is at the core of everything that brought about the RST exam.
It’s important to note – the BRPT has made it very clear that they do NOT and will NOT test based on sleep technologist program curriculums. They are explicitly of a different mind on this subject, and from this derives the biggest difference between the RPSGT and the RST. I asked Dr. Watson a question along these lines in Boston, and what he means to say is – exam takers are not expected to have the in depth theoretical sleep medicine knowledge a physician is expected to have. While that knowledge is great, and a fantastic addition for continued education which improves the skills and knowledge of all technologists, should it really be expected to pass the exam? For those on Binarysleep, do we really need to be Somnonaut to perform night-time study acquisition?
Two words that describe a person's competence are, knowledge and skills. Knowledge refers to learning concepts, principles and information regarding a particular subject through books, media, encyclopedias, academic institutions and other sources. -A skill refers to the ability to use that information and apply it in a context. But, which is more important, Theoretical Knowledge or Practical Skills? It is a question that has lead to the subjective need for a second credentialing style. -Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome -It is great to know that if your patient has consumed alcohol that they may have increased N3, but is that necessary to know to perform the task of polysomnography acquisition?
A real-world example of theory vs. practical that we can all relate to…who had to take the written driving test more than one time? This is their online practice exam, I failed on the first try. And yet – I have a license!
Should someone be required to understand extraneous theory to be employed? Some people are better at answering questions on theory than proving practical functions. And others are better at showing how something is done rather than explaining the theory behind it. And some here took an exam that had both! –Dinosaurs. Unfortunately, no one seems interested in moving back towards that model.
So who’s allowed to sit for this new exam? The BRPT recently changed from paid experience requirements to this style of completion requirements for exam eligibility.
Grandfathering is a concept used all over the medical field. In fact, some of you currently see doctors who may have a lifetime credential. Very scary that they were grandfathered into their specialty’s credentialing, and never have to prove CME’s to retain their licensing. But people of the world can rest easy with the knowledge that every sleep technologist in the world has to prove their CEC’s to remain credentialed, *whew*.
This requirement has been used as a means to insinuate that the AASM is using the new exam as a means to take over the field, and squash all other competition on all fronts that they control. Unsubstantiated conspiracy theories aside, this is why they have the good sense to require their completions be done in a lab that can be monitored for correct procedures. And I don’t know if Pandas would necessarily fail an accreditation visit, but it does serve to prove that we can’t really know what’s going on inside labs where the AASM isn’t checking in regularly – there really could be pandas for all we know! We know that other accrediting organizations do not focus as much on study procedure so much as patient safety and sanitation. It’s important to make sure the studies are being adhered to according to AASM guidelines to confirm the experience expected to sit for the exam.
Now on to the long awaited results of the first exam window! (That’s an 84% pass rate, though a small sampling isn’t accurate enough to give any real merit or meaning to that statistic yet) The first nation-wide offering of the exam is going on right now, and I can’t wait to see the full results from the first widely available testing window.
Now this 90% thing is super interesting and exciting to me, I was blown away while hearing about it in Boston. I find it to be genius, and a great way to keep the test objectively the appropriate difficulty, rather than comparing it’s difficulty to exterior objects. In the space vacuum that is the RST exam, statistically difficult or easy questions (regardless of why they’re too hard or too easy) will be thrown out. So with every testing window the test becomes more and more targeted, narrowed to the line of perfect balance in which students who have studied and learned the information can answer the questions appropriately and pass.
We touched on this earlier when discussing the structure of the ABSM, this is an elaboration and reminder that there isn’t a room full of just doctors somewhere writing out a test for technologists to take. It’s just not that simple.
That’s right, the ABSM is going to launch it’s own version of the CPSGT, an entry-level training exam. I have heard the question asked “Why bother with the CPSGT already in existence?” Well, as we’ve gone over already – the testing style and pathway of the RST is a bit different than the RPSGT, so it stands to reason that they would need an entry exam tailored to the RST’s specific testing/education requirements.
This was in the future when I wrote it, obviously this has already come to pass, and some folks are taking the RST as we speak. Of note is the test questions count, which is also different from the RPSGT. This testing window will be the first wide-spread offer of the RST exam, the results of which will be exciting to see.
Now this is a hot topic, we are hearing about it everywhere. All our BRPT legislation updates focus on preventing states who are working on their practice acts from making the grave mistake of allowing a registry exam which is not certified by the NCCA count for state licensing. So will the RST get NCCA accreditation? I have heard countless times the point driven home that the RST isn’t ‘real’ or isn’t ‘legitimate’ or other similar phrasings because it’s not NCCA accredited. I’m going to go ahead and remind you guys that the BRPT exam gained NCCA accreditation in 2002, and many, many technologists were credentialed by them 2 years prior to that and the years they were still within the APT, and to continue insisting the passing of an unaccredited examination is somehow less or unacceptable is to say that a large number of very qualified and experienced sleep professionals have an RPSGT credential that is somehow less than everyone credentialed after 2002. As the time table it took the BRPT to gain NCCA accreditation hasn’t passed yet, it’s only fair to give the ABSM an equal amount of time to accomplish this feat. I don’t see any reason how or why the ABSM would fail to get accredited. This isn’t their first exam rodeo.
This is another question I’ve heard, someone asked Dr. Watson this in Boston. It’s kind of funny, because if the accusation were true, as unlikely as that is – would he really say yes anyways? An entry level technologist should be able to follow a policy and procedure to successfully complete NPSGs, titrations, etc… they know how to do their job, not always why. Management, educators, those who spend time in extensive continued education, training, or even our 4 year degree over at UNC chapel hill, should know the WHY’S of the job. We cannot expect entry-level night-time technologists to pass an extensive test on theory that they do not need to perform their initial job tasks.
It seems to me a lot of people are still focusing on the RST only as it pertains to the RPSGT, instead of just taking the RST at face value and forming opinions about just it.