(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 09521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON D...
Ethics and the family medicine resident
1. Ethics and the
Family Medicine Resident
From the beginning of life to the end and everything in between
2. Ethics and the Family
Medicine Resident
•BriefHistory of Bioethics as a field
•Framework for Ethics
•Tools and Processes for Decision
Making
•Review of topics in Bioethics
•Case examples
•Small Group Exercise
3. Frameworks for Ethics
Principle Based Framework for
Ethical Decision Making
Beauchamp & Childress:
Autonomy
Beneficence
Non-maleficence
Justice
4. Frameworks for Ethics
Values & Virtues Based Framework for
Ethical Decision Making
Nel Noddings: Ethics of caring
John Rawls: Veil of ignorance
Martha Nussbaum: Capabilities approach
Reciprocity
Religious Directives for decision making are often based on
the values held highest within that community
5. Frameworks for Ethics
Cultural and Religious Norms
Social Contracts, Laws
Professional Codes of Ethic
Religious Traditions & Scriptures
Personal experiences
6. Framework for Ethics
Causistry
Case – based approach to ethical decision making
Most common way for Hospital ethics committees to
work through cases and consultations
Potter‟s Boxes
Facts Values
Principles Loyalties
7. Framework for Ethics
Deontology
Duties
Ex: Immanuel Kant‟s Categorical Imperative
Teleology
Consequences
Ex: John Stuart Mill, “Greatest Good for the
Greatest Number”- Utilitarianism
Both: Worth of persons
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
plato.stanford.edu
8. • Autonomy • Reciprocity
• Beneficence • Honesty
• Nonmaleficence • Integrity
• Justice • Worth of persons
Principles Values
Cases
Cultural Teleology
and vs.
Religious Deontology
• Traditions • Categorical
• Beliefs Imperative
• Experiences • Utilitarianism
• Social Contracts & • Worth of Persons
Laws
9. Principles Values
Decision
Making
Cultural Teleology
and vs.
Religious Deontology
10. Topics
Consent Institutional Ethics
Capacity Conflicts of Interest in
education and in patient care
Disclosure
Just distribution of scarce
Voluntariness/Autonomy resources
Truth Telling Infectious disease ethics
Confidentiality Transplantation ethics
Surrogate decision making Differences in Cultural
Norms
Genetics
Research & IRBs
11. Topics
Before birth End of Life Every Age In-between
Personhood Advanced Directives Allocation of Scarce
Contraception Futility Resources
Donation and storing of Brain Death vs. Cardiac Money/Insurance
Eggs and sperm Death Access to care
Care of Embryos Organ Donation Urban vs. Rural
Mother vs. Fetus Physician Assisted Organ
Assisted reproduction Death Transplantation
Population issues Palliative Sedation Infectious Disease –
Withoding HIV & STIs
Genetic Screening and
Counseling vs.Withdrawaling Elective Procedures
Prenatal Screening Artificial Hydration and Psychiatric Care
Nutrition Opioid Prescribing
Sex Selection
Ventilation Research & trials
Cloning
Surrogate Decision Informed consent
Eugenics making
Blood transfusions
12. Famous Landmark Cases
Baby M- anencephaly
Helga Wanglie- When families disagree
Terri Shiavo, Nancy Cruzan- Withdrawling vs.
Witholding Life Support: Artificial Nutrition and
Hydration & Ventilator
Tuskeegee Syphillis Study
13. Local Cases
Mr. K
21 yo near drowning in 2009, with brain damage and
recurrent sepsis. Mr. K was an exchange student from
Ghana, planning to study and play soccer at Whitworth
Mr. C
Conscientious objection of Medtronic technologist to
turn off dual ICD and Pacer in a gentleman who has
chosen to allow natural death
Ms. N
Bipolar clinic patient in active mania who refuses to go to
SMH for Psychiatric evaluation. Due to her insurance, this
is currently her only option for Psychiatric care.
14. Things we encounter in
FMS Daily
In the Clinic
Opioid prescribing
Care of the Difficult patient
Reproductive topics:
Contraception- daily OCPs and emergency contraception
IUDs, Tubals, Vasectomies
Discussing Advanced Directives & POLST forms
What to Do When Families Disagree
In the hospital:
Withholding and Withdrawaling life support
15. The Role of Conscience in
Medical Decisions
Daniel Sulmasy, OFM, MD, PhD
University of Chicago
Does conscience ever clash with professional duties? What do we
mean by terms such as „conscience‟ and „conscientious objection‟?
How should one approach a request from a patient that conflicts with
one‟s individual conscience? Exploring how medical professionals can
strive to preserve their moral integrity while also respecting and
serving patients with whom they might have deep moral
disagreements.
Hinweis der Redaktion
Categorical Imperative: act only in ways that you are willing to make it a law/duty for all others to act in the same wayThe first premise is that a person acts morally if his or her conduct would, without condition, be the "right" conduct for any person in similar circumstancesThe second premise is that conduct is "right" if it treats others as ends in themselves and not as means to an end.The conclusion is that a person acts morally when he or she acts as if his or her conduct was establishing a universal law governing others in similar circumstances